1
|
Kotsis F, Bächle H, Altenbuchinger M, Dönitz J, Njipouombe Nsangou YA, Meiselbach H, Kosch R, Salloch S, Bratan T, Zacharias HU, Schultheiss UT. Expectation of clinical decision support systems: a survey study among nephrologist end-users. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:239. [PMID: 37884906 PMCID: PMC10605935 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02317-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a major public health problem with differing disease etiologies, leads to complications, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and mortality. Monitoring disease progression and personalized treatment efforts are crucial for long-term patient outcomes. Physicians need to integrate different data levels, e.g., clinical parameters, biomarkers, and drug information, with medical knowledge. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can tackle these issues and improve patient management. Knowledge about the awareness and implementation of CDSS in Germany within the field of nephrology is scarce. PURPOSE Nephrologists' attitude towards any CDSS and potential CDSS features of interest, like adverse event prediction algorithms, is important for a successful implementation. This survey investigates nephrologists' experiences with and expectations towards a useful CDSS for daily medical routine in the outpatient setting. METHODS The 38-item questionnaire survey was conducted either by telephone or as a do-it-yourself online interview amongst nephrologists across all of Germany. Answers were collected and analysed using the Electronic Data Capture System REDCap, as well as Stata SE 15.1, and Excel. The survey consisted of four modules: experiences with CDSS (M1), expectations towards a helpful CDSS (M2), evaluation of adverse event prediction algorithms (M3), and ethical aspects of CDSS (M4). Descriptive statistical analyses of all questions were conducted. RESULTS The study population comprised 54 physicians, with a response rate of about 80-100% per question. Most participants were aged between 51-60 years (45.1%), 64% were male, and most participants had been working in nephrology out-patient clinics for a median of 10.5 years. Overall, CDSS use was poor (81.2%), often due to lack of knowledge about existing CDSS. Most participants (79%) believed CDSS to be helpful in the management of CKD patients with a high willingness to try out a CDSS. Of all adverse event prediction algorithms, prediction of CKD progression (97.8%) and in-silico simulations of disease progression when changing, e. g., lifestyle or medication (97.7%) were rated most important. The spectrum of answers on ethical aspects of CDSS was diverse. CONCLUSION This survey provides insights into experience with and expectations of out-patient nephrologists on CDSS. Despite the current lack of knowledge on CDSS, the willingness to integrate CDSS into daily patient care, and the need for adverse event prediction algorithms was high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fruzsina Kotsis
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Medicine IV - Nephrology and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Helena Bächle
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Altenbuchinger
- Department of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dönitz
- Department of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Heike Meiselbach
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robin Kosch
- Department of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Tanja Bratan
- Competence Center Emerging Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Helena U Zacharias
- Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Ulla T Schultheiss
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- Department of Medicine IV - Nephrology and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nateghi Haredasht F, Viaene L, Pottel H, De Corte W, Vens C. Predicting outcomes of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients using machine learning. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9864. [PMID: 37331979 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36782-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a sudden episode of kidney failure that is frequently seen in critically ill patients. AKI has been linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality. We developed machine learning-based prediction models to predict outcomes following AKI stage 3 events in the intensive care unit. We conducted a prospective observational study that used the medical records of ICU patients diagnosed with AKI stage 3. A random forest algorithm was used to develop two models that can predict patients who will progress to CKD after three and six months of experiencing AKI stage 3. To predict mortality, two survival prediction models have been presented using random survival forests and survival XGBoost. We evaluated established CKD prediction models using AUCROC, and AUPR curves and compared them with the baseline logistic regression models. The mortality prediction models were evaluated with an external test set, and the C-indices were compared to baseline COXPH. We included 101 critically ill patients who experienced AKI stage 3. To increase the training set for the mortality prediction task, an unlabeled dataset has been added. The RF (AUPR: 0.895 and 0.848) and XGBoost (c-index: 0.8248) models have a better performance than the baseline models in predicting CKD and mortality, respectively Machine learning-based models can assist clinicians in making clinical decisions regarding critically ill patients with severe AKI who are likely to develop CKD following discharge. Additionally, we have shown better performance when unlabeled data are incorporated into the survival analysis task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fateme Nateghi Haredasht
- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
- ITEC - imec and KU Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 51, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| | - Liesbeth Viaene
- Department of Nephrology, AZ Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hans Pottel
- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Wouter De Corte
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, AZ Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine Vens
- KU Leuven, Campus KULAK - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
- ITEC - imec and KU Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 51, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jamme M, Legrand M, Geri G. Outcome of acute kidney injury: how to make a difference? Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:60. [PMID: 33856581 PMCID: PMC8050180 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00849-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent organ failure encountered among intensive care unit patients. In addition to the well-known immediate complications (hydroelectrolytic disorders, hypervolemia, drug overdose), the occurrence of long-term complications and/or chronic comorbidities related to AKI has long been underestimated. The aim of this manuscript is to briefly review the short- and long-term consequences of AKI and discuss strategies likely to improve outcome of AKI. Main body We reviewed the literature, focusing on the consequences of AKI in all its aspects and the management of AKI. We addressed the importance of clinical management for improving outcomes AKI. Finally, we have also proposed candidate future strategies and management perspectives. Conclusion AKI must be considered as a systemic disease. Due to its short- and long-term impact, measures to prevent AKI and limit the consequences of AKI are expected to improve global outcomes of patients suffering from critical illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Jamme
- Service de Réanimation, Hôpital de Poissy, CHI Poissy Saint Germain, 10 rue du champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France. .,INSERM UMR 1018, Equipe Epidémiologie clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France. .,Université Paris Saclay, UFR Simone Veil - Santé, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France.
| | - Matthieu Legrand
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Guillaume Geri
- INSERM UMR 1018, Equipe Epidémiologie clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Saclay, UFR Simone Veil - Santé, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sohaney R, Heung M. Care of the Survivor of Critical Illness and Acute Kidney Injury: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:105-113. [PMID: 34389131 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with adverse short- and long-term health consequences. Survivors of critical illness and AKI experience poor kidney, cardiovascular and quality of life outcomes, along with increased mortality. Yet, many patients surviving AKI are unaware that there is a problem with their kidney health, and post-AKI nephrology follow-up occurs at very low rates. Although there is a paucity of evidence-based studies to guide post-AKI care, attention to risk factors such as hypertension and albuminuria are requisite. There are several ongoing or planned studies which are expected to help inform specific management in the future. Until then, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to address areas such as quality of life, physical rehabilitation, dietary modifications, and medication reconciliation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Massy ZA, Caskey FJ, Finne P, Harambat J, Jager KJ, Nagler E, Stengel B, Sever MS, Vanholder R, Blankestijn PJ, Bruchfeld A, Capasso G, Fliser D, Fouque D, Goumenos D, Soler MJ, Rychlík I, Spasovski G, Stevens K, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Nephrology and Public Policy Committee propositions to stimulate research collaboration in adults and children in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 34:1469-1480. [PMID: 31197325 PMCID: PMC6736134 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The strengths and the limitations of research activities currently present in Europe are explored in order to outline how to proceed in the near future. Epidemiological and clinical research and public policy in Europe are generally considered to be comprehensive and successful, and the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) is playing a key role in the field of nephrology research. The Nephrology and Public Policy Committee (NPPC) aims to improve the current situation and translation into public policy by planning eight research topics to be supported in the coming 5 years by ERA-EDTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad A Massy
- Division of Nephrology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Paris-Ile-de-France-West University (UVSQ), Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, France.,INSERM U1018 Team5, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Fergus J Caskey
- Consultant Senior Lecturer, Population Health Sciences University of Bristol, UK
| | - Patrik Finne
- Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases, Helsinki, Finland.,Abdominal Center Nephrology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jerome Harambat
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Pellegrin-Enfants Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, and University of Bordeaux, INSERM, Team LEHA, Bordeaux, France
| | - Kitty J Jager
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evi Nagler
- European Renal Best Practice, London, UK
| | | | - Mehmet Sukru Sever
- Department of Nephrology/Internal Medicine, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Millet Caddesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Raymond Vanholder
- Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter J Blankestijn
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annette Bruchfeld
- Department of Renal Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovambattista Capasso
- Department of Medical Translational Sciences, University of "Luigi Vanvitelli" Naples and Biogem, Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Danilo Fliser
- Department of Internal Medicine IV-Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Denis Fouque
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Nutrition, Université de Lyon, CARMEN, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite Cedex, France
| | | | - Maria Jose Soler
- Department of Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Rychlík
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Goce Spasovski
- Department of Nephrology, Medical Faculty, University of Skopje, Skopje, Former Yugoslav, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Kathryn Stevens
- Glasgow Renal and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christoph Wanner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|