1
|
Oliosi E, Júlio AC, Silva L, Probst P, Vilas-Boas JP, Pinheiro AR, Gamboa H. Correlation Between Pain Intensity and Trunk Sway in Seated Posture Among Office Workers with Chronic Spinal Pain: A Pilot Field-Based Study. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025; 25:1583. [PMID: 40096484 PMCID: PMC11902825 DOI: 10.3390/s25051583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2025] [Revised: 02/22/2025] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
This pilot study examines the relationship between pain intensity and trunk sitting postural control in 10 office workers with chronic spinal pain, using field-based real-time inertial sensors. Pain intensity was assessed with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) before and after work across three non-consecutive workdays, while postural control was evaluated through estimated center of pressure (COP) displacements. Linear and nonlinear metrics, including sway range, velocity, the Hurst exponent, and sample entropy, were derived from the estimated COP time series. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and corresponding p-values were used to analyze the relationship between pain intensity and postural control. Significant correlations, though limited to specific metrics, were found (r = -0.860 to 0.855; p < 0.05), suggesting that higher pain intensity may be correlated with reduced postural variability. These findings provide preliminary insights into the potential link between pain intensity and postural control. Understanding trunk posture dynamics could inform the development of targeted ergonomic interventions to reduce musculoskeletal stress and improve sitting comfort in office environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduarda Oliosi
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys), NOVA School of Science & Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (A.C.J.); (L.S.); (P.P.); (H.G.)
- Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health, and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
| | - Afonso Caetano Júlio
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys), NOVA School of Science & Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (A.C.J.); (L.S.); (P.P.); (H.G.)
| | - Luís Silva
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys), NOVA School of Science & Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (A.C.J.); (L.S.); (P.P.); (H.G.)
| | - Phillip Probst
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys), NOVA School of Science & Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (A.C.J.); (L.S.); (P.P.); (H.G.)
| | - João Paulo Vilas-Boas
- Centre for Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Ana Rita Pinheiro
- Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;
| | - Hugo Gamboa
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys), NOVA School of Science & Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (A.C.J.); (L.S.); (P.P.); (H.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oliosi E, Júlio A, Probst P, Silva L, Vilas-Boas JP, Pinheiro AR, Gamboa H. Exploring the Real-Time Variability and Complexity of Sitting Patterns in Office Workers with Non-Specific Chronic Spinal Pain and Pain-Free Individuals. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:4750. [PMID: 39066146 PMCID: PMC11281106 DOI: 10.3390/s24144750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Chronic spinal pain (CSP) is a prevalent condition, and prolonged sitting at work can contribute to it. Ergonomic factors like this can cause changes in motor variability. Variability analysis is a useful method to measure changes in motor performance over time. When performing the same task multiple times, different performance patterns can be observed. This variability is intrinsic to all biological systems and is noticeable in human movement. This study aims to examine whether changes in movement variability and complexity during real-time office work are influenced by CSP. The hypothesis is that individuals with and without pain will have different responses to office work tasks. Six office workers without pain and ten with CSP participated in this study. Participant's trunk movements were recorded during work for an entire week. Linear and nonlinear measures of trunk kinematic displacement were used to assess movement variability and complexity. A mixed ANOVA was utilized to compare changes in movement variability and complexity between the two groups. The effects indicate that pain-free participants showed more complex and less predictable trunk movements with a lower degree of structure and variability when compared to the participants suffering from CSP. The differences were particularly noticeable in fine movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduarda Oliosi
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal; (A.J.); (P.P.); (L.S.); (H.G.)
- Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL-FADEUP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4000-000 Porto, Portugal
| | - Afonso Júlio
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal; (A.J.); (P.P.); (L.S.); (H.G.)
| | - Phillip Probst
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal; (A.J.); (P.P.); (L.S.); (H.G.)
| | - Luís Silva
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal; (A.J.); (P.P.); (L.S.); (H.G.)
| | - João Paulo Vilas-Boas
- Centre for Research, Training, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4000-000 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Ana Rita Pinheiro
- Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3800-000 Aveiro, Portugal;
| | - Hugo Gamboa
- Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal; (A.J.); (P.P.); (L.S.); (H.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Variability of Postural Stability and Plantar Pressure Parameters in Healthy Subjects Evaluated by a Novel Pressure Plate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052913. [PMID: 35270606 PMCID: PMC8910512 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: Postural stability and plantar pressure parameters can be assessed by baropodometry; nevertheless, they are often affected by low repeatability. The aim of the study was to test the accuracy and repeatability of a novel resistive sensor pressure plate and to establish the most reliable baropodometric parameters. Methods: Accuracy and repeatability of the FM12050 BTS-Bioengineering plate measurements were assessed by using different weights in static conditions across three sessions. Subsequently, 20 healthy subjects were assessed by 30-s stabilometric analysis in bipedal standing with open eyes across four trials in two sessions, morning and afternoon. Results: Pressure plate repeatability in measuring the static weights was very high, and plate measurements were correlated to the scale measurements (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.99). Percentage of load distribution between left and right foot and in rearfoot and forefoot regions showed the largest repeatability (coefficient of variation < 5%) across trials. Eventually, median and percentiles (25−75%) were reported for each parameter. Conclusions: This study helped to assess the accuracy and repeatability of a novel pressure plate in static conditions and to define the most reliable parameters for the assessment of postural stability and foot morphology. The present healthy-subject stabilometric dataset may be used as reference data in the evaluation of pathological populations.
Collapse
|