[On the causes and pathogenesis of so-called late epilepsy]

Ruxolitinib in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD): findings from a compassionate use program

The ruxolitinib compassionate use (CU) program offered ruxolitinib to patients ≥2 years of age with confirmed steroid-resistant acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively). Data from 1180 patients (n = 775, 370 and 35 with cGvHD, aGvHD, and non-specified GvHD, respectively) were analyzed. Most patients had severe cGvHD (56%) or stage III/IV aGvHD (70%) disease and had previously received corticosteroids ( > 80%); ruxolitinib was requested primarily as a second-/third-line option. Patients <12 and ≥12 years old most often received the recommended ruxolitinib doses (5 mg twice daily [BID] and 10 mg BID, respectively); however, 23% and 30% of ≥12 year olds with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, received the lower dose of 5 mg BID. Notably, corticosteroid usage decreased with ruxolitinib treatment; at the initial ruxolitinib request, 81% and 91% of patients with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids whereas at resupply, 62% and 64%, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids. Eighty two percent of evaluable patients with cGvHD had a complete or partial response to treatment and 56% of evaluable patients with aGvHD had a best response of grade 0/I. These findings demonstrate the rapid and positive effects of ruxolitinib in patients with GvHD in a real-world setting.

Ruxolitinib Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib has been increasingly used in the treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients. However, there are limited data on the use of ruxolitinib in children.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of ruxolitinib in the treatment of SR-GVHD in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of patients who suffered from SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib treatment between June 2018 and December 2020 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The characteristics of patients, the dosage of ruxolitinib, the response, toxicity, and the survival data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 14 pediatric patients were diagnosed with SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib. The age of the patients ranged from 3 months to 12 years old. The dosage of ruxolitinib ranged from 2.5 mg twice daily to 7.5 mg twice daily, mainly according to patient weight. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 64.3% (9/14), with 63.6% (7/11) in aGVHD and 67% (2/3) in cGVHD. Of the 14 patients, adverse effects were observed in 9 patients (64.3%), including cytopenia, infection, and elevated alanine aminotransferase. In addition, seven reports on the treatment of SR-GVHD in children with ruxolitinib were included for systematic analysis, with the ORR ranging from 45 to 87% in aGVHD and 70-91% in cGVHD.

CONCLUSION

Given its effectiveness and safety, ruxolitinib could be used to treat SR-GVHD in children after HSCT.

FDA Approval Summary: Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Failure of One or Two Lines of Systemic Therapy

On September 22, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved ruxolitinib for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Approval was based on Study INCB 18424-365 (REACH-3; CINC424D2301; NCT03112603), a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of ruxolitinib in comparison to best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD occurring after the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 329 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily (n = 165) or BAT (n = 164). BAT was selected by the investigator prior to randomization. The overall response rate through Cycle 7 Day 1 was 70% (95% CI, 63-77) in the ruxolitinib arm, and 57% (95% CI, 49-65) in the BAT arm. The median duration of response, calculated from first response to progression, death, or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD, was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.7) for the ruxolitinib arm and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6-3.2) for the BAT arm; and the median time from first response to death or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD was 25 months (95% CI, 16.8-not estimable) for the ruxolitinib arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.8) for the BAT arm. Common adverse reactions included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Given the observed response rate with durability, the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib appears to outweigh the risks of treatment for cGVHD after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy.

A Comprehensive Overview of Globally Approved JAK Inhibitors

Janus kinase (JAK) is a family of cytoplasmic non-receptor tyrosine kinases that includes four members, namely JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2. The JAKs transduce cytokine signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway, which regulates the transcription of several genes involved in inflammatory, immune, and cancer conditions. Targeting the JAK family kinases with small-molecule inhibitors has proved to be effective in the treatment of different types of diseases. In the current review, eleven of the JAK inhibitors that received approval for clinical use have been discussed. These drugs are abrocitinib, baricitinib, delgocitinib, fedratinib, filgotinib, oclacitinib, pacritinib, peficitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. The aim of the current review was to provide an integrated overview of the chemical and pharmacological data of the globally approved JAK inhibitors. The synthetic routes of the eleven drugs were described. In addition, their inhibitory activities against different kinases and their pharmacological uses have also been explained. Moreover, their crystal structures with different kinases were summarized, with a primary focus on their binding modes and interactions. The proposed metabolic pathways and metabolites of these drugs were also illustrated. To sum up, the data in the current review could help in the design of new JAK inhibitors with potential therapeutic benefits in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Effect of ruxolitinib on the oral mucosa of patients with steroid-refractory chronic Graft-versus-Host disease and oral involvement

BACKGROUND

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) can impact quality of life, especially in patients with oral involvement. Half of the patients with cGVHD do not respond to first-line therapy with corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Ruxolitinib is effective in steroid-refractory (SR)-cGVHD cases, but the long-term effects of ruxolitinib on the oral mucosa are unknown.

OBJECTIVE(S)

This study aims to assess the effect of ruxolitinib on the oral mucosa of SR-cGVHD patients with oral involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational longitudinal patient study was conducted in 53 patients with SR-cGVHD and oral involvement who were treated with ruxolitinib. The baseline condition of the oral mucosa was compared to its condition at 4 and 12 weeks after starting ruxolitinib.

RESULTS

The overall response was 81% (43/53), with a complete response in 53% (28/53) and partial response in 28% (15/53) after 12 weeks (p < 0.001). Men and patients concurrently using immunosuppressive therapy responded better than women (p = 0.005) and patients with ruxolitinib monotherapy (p = 0.02), respectively. At a longer follow-up (median 20 months), oral symptoms were comparable to the 12-week symptoms (p = 0.78), regardless of ruxolitinib use (p = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib treatment of SR-cGVHD patients with oral involvement was associated with a significant response of the oral manifestations at 12 weeks.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The oral mucosa of SR-cGVHD patients is likely to improve after 4 and 12 weeks of ruxolitinib treatment. Symptom severity at baseline does not affect the response of the oral mucosa.

Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors

BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are burdened by a reduced life expectancy mostly due to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events, fibrotic progression/leukemic evolution, and infectious complications. In these clonal myeloid malignancies, JAK2V617F is the main driver mutation, leading to an aberrant activation of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway. Therefore, its inhibition represents an attractive therapeutic strategy for these disorders. Several JAK inhibitors have entered clinical trials, including ruxolitinib, the first JAK1/2 inhibitor to become commercially available for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. Due to interference with the JAK-STAT pathway, JAK inhibitors affect several components of the innate and adaptive immune systems such as dendritic cells, natural killer cells, T helper cells, and regulatory T cells. Therefore, even though the clinical use of these drugs in MPN patients has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control, organ involvement, and quality of life, JAK inhibitors–related loss of function in JAK-STAT signaling pathway can be a cause of different adverse events, including those related to a condition of immune suppression or deficiency. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on JAK inhibitors’ effects on immune cells as well as their clinical consequences, particularly with regards to infectious complications.

Ruxolitinib in the management of steroid-resistant/-dependent acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: results of routine practice in an academic centre

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an important complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment. Steroid-resistant/-dependent (SR/D) acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD) lead to significant morbidity/mortality. The JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has recently been shown in clinical trials to be effective in SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD. We retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in a cohort of SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD patients treated in a non-trial setting. In the aGVHD cohort, there were 14 men and 12 women, median age at 38 (19-63) years. At day 28 post-ruxolitinib, the overall response rate (ORR) was 86% (complete response, CR, 36%; partial response, PR, 50%). Continued ruxolitinib beyond day 28 resulted in a final CR of 68%. However, 3/15 (20%) of CR patients developed cGVHD. In the cGVHD cohort, there were 16 men and 15 women, median age at 33 (21-64) years. The ORR, CR and PR rates changed with continued ruxolitinib treatment, being 86%, 17% and 69% at 1 month; 79%, 38% and 41% at 3 months; and 83%, 52% and 31% at 6 months. Five patients had overlap GVHD, four of whom achieved CR. Multivariate analysis showed that superior overall survival and failure-free survival were associated with CR at day 28 for aGVHD, and CR at 1 year for cGVHD. Ruxolitinib treatment was efficacious for SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD, and continued treatment for at least 6 months was needed to maximize benefit.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Cell Therapy

Cellular therapies such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immune-effector cell therapy (IECT) continue to have a critical role in the treatment of patients with high risk malignancies and hematologic conditions. These therapies are also associated with inflammatory conditions such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) which contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality associated with these therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of the immunological mechanisms that underly GVHD and CRS highlight an important role for Janus kinases (JAK). JAK pathways are important for the signaling of several cytokines and are involved in the activation and proliferation of several immune cell subsets. In this review, we provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of JAK inhibitors for acute and chronic GVHD and CRS.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Dermatology: Part 2: Applications in Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Other Dermatoses

Dermatologists' interest in the Janus-associated kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway has been growing as evidence builds to support its key role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin diseases. Because certain proinflammatory cytokines use the JAK/STAT pathway for signal transduction, it has become a promising therapeutic target in diseases where selective modulation of the immune system can be useful. We aim to review current knowledge of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its role in immune-mediated skin diseases. In the second part of the review we cover the efficacy and safety of oral and topical JAK inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and other skin diseases.

Ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory graft versus host disease in pediatric HSCT: high response rate and manageable toxicity

Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is a promising treatment for the steroid-refractory graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Most studies have been performed in the adult population showing efficacy against GvHD. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of 19 children who received ruxolitinib for refractory acute or chronic GvHD (cGvHD) after HSCT from two Pediatric Hemato-Oncology Departments in Spain between March 2017 and December 2018. Patients received a median number of 4 (IQR 2) previous lines of treatment before starting ruxolitinib. The overall response rate in acute GvHD (aGvHD) and cGvHD was 87% and 91%, respectively. Complete response (CR) was observed in 37% of aGvHD and 8.3% of cGvHD. Remarkably, 43% and 40% of patients with steroid-refractory gastrointestinal aGvHD and lung cGvHD achieved CR. During ruxolitinib treatment, there were 36%, 31%, and 10% infections caused by viruses, bacteria, and fungi, respectively. Overall, four patients interrupted ruxolitinib due to infectious complications, hematological, and liver toxicity. The 2-year overall survival was 71.9% (CI 95% 58.6-85.2). Our experience supports the use of ruxolitinib as an effective treatment for steroid-refractory acute and cGvHD in children with a moderate toxicity profile.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Dermatology: Part 2: Applications in Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Other Dermatoses

Dermatologists' interest in the Janus-associated kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway has been growing as evidence builds to support its key role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin diseases. Because certain proinflammatory cytokines use the JAK/STAT pathway for signal transduction, it has become a promising therapeutic target in diseases where selective modulation of the immune system can be useful. We aim to review current knowledge of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its role in immune-mediated skin diseases. In the second part of the review we cover the efficacy and safety of oral and topical JAK inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and other skin diseases.

Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for multidrug-resistant graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without posttransplant cyclophosphamide

The purpose of our study is to identify the efficacy of ruxolitinib in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, n = 34). MDR-GVHD was defined as GVHD showing no improvement after at least 3 types of treatments. The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 4 for both MDR-acute GVHD (aGVHD) and MDR-chronic GVHD (cGVHD). For MDR-aGVHD (n = 15), the median time to response was 10 days (range 2 to 65), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 60.0% (9/15), including 40.0% (6/15) complete response (CR) and 20.0% (3/15) partial response (PR). The 1-year probability of overall survival after ruxolitinib was 66.7%. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 73.3% and 46.7% after ruxolitinib treatment. For MDR-cGVHD (n = 19), the median time to response was 29 days (range 6 to 175), and the ORR was 89.5% (17/19), including 26.3% (5/19) CR and 63.2% (12/19) PR. All patients remained alive until our last follow-up. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 36.8% and 47.4% after ruxolitinib treatment. Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for MDR-GVHD in haplo-HSCT recipients.

Ruxolitinib combined with etanercept induce a rapid response to corticosteroid-refractory severe acute graft vs host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Results of a multi-center prospective study

About half of patients with severe acute graft vs host disease (aGVHD) show resistance to treatment with first-line steroids. We enrolled 64 patients with grades III-IV SR-aGVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of ruxolitinib and etanercept. The overall response rate was 87.5% (95% CI, 79.7%-95.3%) at day 28 of the combination treatment, from which 73.4% reached complete response (CR). A marked reduction ≥75% in daily corticosteroid dosing was documented in 75.4% of patients at day 28. Delayed time from aGVHD to ruxolitinib (OR = 4.88, 95% CI, 0.98-23.56), stages 3-4 liver aGVHD (OR = 8.57, 95% CI, 0.96-46.59) and gut Enterobacteriaceae colonization (OR = 12.39, 95% CI, 1.71-59.77) were related to incomplete response. Grades 3/4 anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia and CMV-reactivation were found in 29.7%, 26.6%, 39.1%, and 50.0% of patients, respectively. So, 25 (39.1%) experienced complications of severe infection ≥3 grade, in which pulmonary infections were most frequent (15/64, 23.4%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) after the combination therapy was 61.2%. The 2-year incidence of non-relapse mortality and relapse of the underlying malignancy was 26.7% and 15.7%, respectively. Combined treatment with ruxolitinib and etanercept was very effective and relatively safe for severe aGVHD patients, while the various infection complications deserve more attention. This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900024408).

A real life use of ruxolitinib in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease refractory to corticosteroid treatment in Latin American patients

Introduction

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication in allogeneic transplantation. The first-line treatment is high doses of corticosteroids. In the absence of response to corticosteroids, several immunosuppressive drugs can be used, but they entail an elevated risk of severe infections. Added to this, there are patients who do not improve on any immunosuppressive treatment, with subsequent deteriorated quality of life and high mortality. Ruxolitinib has been shown to induce responses in refractory patients. In this study we have presented our real-life experience.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with severe GVHD refractory to corticosteroids. Demographic, previous treatment, response and mortality data were collected.

Results

Since 2014, seventeen patients with GVHD were treated with ruxolitinib due to refractoriness to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a few to extracorporeal photopheresis, 8 with acute GVHD (1 pulmonary, 4 cutaneous grade IV and 3 digestive grade IV) and 9 with chronic GHVD (5 cutaneous sclerodermiform, 2 pulmonary and 1 multisystemic). The overall response to ruxolitinib treatment for acute GVHD was 80%, 40% with partial response and 40% with complete remission. Global response in chronic GVHD was 79%. The GVHD mortality was only seen in acute disease and was 40%. Causes of mortality in those patients were severe viral pneumonia, post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome and meningeal GVHD refractory to ruxolitinib.

Conclusions

In our series, the use of ruxolitinib as a rescue strategy in acute or chronic GVHD was satisfactory. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with a very poor prognosis showed encouraging results. However, the GVHD mortality remains high in refractory patients, showing that better therapeutic strategies are needed.

JAK/STAT Pathway Inhibition May Be a Promising Therapy for COVID-19-Related Hyperinflammation in Hematologic Patients

COVID-19 has rapidly become a major concern for the health systems worldwide. Its high contagiousness and associated mortality demand the discovery of helpful interventions with promising safety profile. Here, we report 3 severe COVID-19 cases, which achieved rapid and sustained improvement in outcome with the use of ruxolitinib, a JAK/STAT pathway inhibitor.

Ruxolitinib add-on in corticosteroid-refractory graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Results from a retrospective study on 38 Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Some patients have steroid-refractory (SR) GVHD.

AIM

To evaluate the effect and safety of ruxolitinib add-on in the treatment of patients with SR acute (a) and chronic (c) GVHD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients administered ruxolitinib add-on to standard immunosuppressive therapy for SR-aGVHD or SR-cGVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib was administered 5-10 mg/d depending on disease severity, patient status, and the use of anti-fungal drugs. Overall response rate, time to best response, malignancy relapse rate, infection rate, and treatment-related adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 10 patients with SR-aGVHD (grade III/IV, n = 9) and 28 patients with SR-cGVHD (moderate/severe, n = 24). For the SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD groups, respectively: Median number of previous GVHD therapies was 2 (range: 1-3) and 2 (1-4); median follow-up was 2.5 (1.5-4) and 5 (1.5-10) mo; median time to best response was 1 (0.5-2.5) and 3 (1-9.5) mo; and overall response rate was 100% (complete response: 80%) and 82.1% (complete response: 10.7%) with a response observed in all GVHD-affected organs. The malignancy relapse rates for the SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD groups were 10.0% and 10.7%, respectively. Reactivation rates for cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and varicella-zoster virus, respectively, were 30.0%, 10.0%, and 0% for the SR-aGVHD group and 0%, 14.3%, and 7.1% for the SR-cGVHD group.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib add-on was effective and safe as salvage therapy for SR-GVHD.

Janus Kinase Inhibition for Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment for many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases. A major complication of the procedure is the donor T-cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). GvHD accounts for about 10% of early mortality after transplantation. GVHD is also the major cause of morbidity and disability in the late follow-up phase of transplanted patients, mainly because of the low response to first-line steroids, and the lack of efficient second-line standard treatments. The increasing knowledge regarding GVHD pathogenesis provides new pharmacological targets, potentially exploitable in clinical practice, in order to prevent and treat this complication. This review provides a description of GVHD pathogenesis, with a focus on the central role of the Janus kinase-related mechanisms. The first inflammatory innate-immunity response is triggered by a JAK/STAT dependent pathway, and JAK inhibition impairs antigen-presenting cell differentiation and activation and downregulates the expression of signals for T-cell triggering. The chronic evolution of alloreactivity, characterized by the long-term maintenance of inflammation and fibrosis, is also dependent on JAK/STAT activation. Based on preclinical data, we reviewed the rationale behind the clinical use of JAK-inhibitors in GVHD, presenting available results of clinical trials and reports, and looked at future implementation of this new promising treatment approach.

Calcineurin Inhibitors Replacement by Ruxolitinib as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) that carries a high mortality. Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been widely used in GVHD prophylaxis, the incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains at roughly 30% to 50%. Moreover, some allo-SCT recipients cannot tolerate CNI. Thus, improved GVHD prevention methods are needed. Our study aimed to determine the prophylactic value of ruxolitinib for GVHD in CNI-intolerant patients after allo-SCT. Between September 2017 and March 2019, 10 patients with hematopoietic malignancies after allo-SCT who were intolerant to CNI at our center were enrolled in this study. The regimens were based on a myeloablative busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen. Antithymocyte globulin was administered to patients with an HLA-haploidentical related donor (HRD) at a dosage of 6 mg/kg. All received ruxolitinib to replace CNI as GVHD prophylaxis. Ruxolitinib was initiated at 5 to 10 mg twice daily until 2 to 3 months post-transplantation and then tapered gradually, and in the absence of GVHD, discontinued by day +180. Eight patients had acute leukemia, 1 patient had myeloproliferative neoplasm, and 1 patient had natural killer T cell (NK/T) lymphoma. The donor type was a matched sibling donor in 3 patients and an HLA-haploidentical related donor (HRD) in 7 patients. All patients received CNI plus short-course of methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis, but showed intolerance to CNI within 45 days post-transplantation. After ruxolitinib replacement, only 1 patient (10%) developed grade II skin aGVHD within 100 days, and only 1 patient developed severe aGVHD after 100 days. Two patients developed moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) after tapering or stopping ruxolitinib, resulting in a 1-year cumulative incidence of moderate/severe cGVHD of 21.4%. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurred in 4 patients (40%), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in 3 patients (30%). None of the patients developed CMV disease or EBV post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. After a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 2 to 15.5 months), 2 patients (20%) relapsed and 7 (70%) were alive, of whom 6 (60%) were negative for minimal residual disease and 4 were off immunosuppressant therapy. The prophylactic application of ruxolitinib for CNI-intolerant patients after allo-SCT appears to be safe and effective in preventing GVHD, but this awaits further study in larger cohorts.

Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib

The JAK-STAT signaling pathway plays a central role in signal transduction in hematopoietic cells, as well as in cells of the immune system. The occurrence in most patients affected by myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) of driver mutations resulting in the constitutive activation of JAK2-dependent signaling identified the deregulated JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway as the major pathogenic mechanism of MPNs. It also prompted the development of targeted drugs for MPNs. Ruxolitinib is a potent and selective oral inhibitor of both JAK2 and JAK1 protein kinases. Its use in patients with myelofibrosis is associated with a substantial reduction in spleen volume, attenuation of symptoms and decreased mortality. With growing clinical experience, concerns about infectious complications, and increased risk of B-cell lymphoma, presumably caused by the effects of JAK1/2 inhibition on immune response and immunosurveillance, have been raised. Evidence shows that ruxolitinib exerts potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Cellular targets of ruxolitinib include various components of both the innate and adaptive immune system, such as natural killer cells, dendritic cells, T helper, and regulatory T cells. On the other hand, immunomodulatory properties have proven beneficial in some instances, as highlighted by the successful use of ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-resistant graft vs. host disease. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of published evidence addressing the key question of the mechanisms underlying ruxolitinib-induced immunosuppression.

FDA Approval Summary: Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

On May 24, 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Approval was based on Study INCB 18424-271 (REACH-1; NCT02953678), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial that included 49 patients with grades 2-4 SR-aGVHD occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib was administered at 5 mg twice daily, with dose increases to 10 mg twice daily permitted after 3 days in the absence of toxicity. The Day-28 overall response rate was 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.2-71.2). The median duration of response was 0.5 months (95% CI: 0.3-2.7), and the median time from Day-28 response to either death or need for new therapy for acute GVHD was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.2 to not estimable). Common adverse reactions included anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, infections, edema, bleeding, and elevated transaminases. Ruxolitinib is the first drug approved for treatment of SR-aGVHD. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ruxolitinib is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Its approval provides a treatment option for the 60% of those patients who do not respond to steroid therapy.

Mast Cells Are Mediators of Fibrosis and Effector Cell Recruitment in Dermal Chronic Graft-vs.-Host Disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is often used to treat acute leukemia or defects of hematopoiesis. Its widespread use is hampered by graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), which has high morbidity and mortality in both acute and chronic subtypes. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurs most frequently in skin and often is characterized by pathogenic fibrosis. Mast cells (MCs) are known to be involved in the pathogenesis of other fibrotic diseases. In a murine model of cGVHD after allo-HSCT, C57BL/6J recipients of allogeneic LP/J donor cells develop sclerodermatous dermal cGVHD which is significantly decreased in mast cell-deficient B6.Cg-Kit^W-sh/HNihrJaeBsmGlliJ recipients. The presence of MCs is associated with fibrosis, chemokine production, and recruitment of GVHD effector cells to the skin. Chemokine production by MCs is blocked by drugs used to treat cGVHD. The importance of MCs in skin cGVHD is mirrored by increased MCs in the skin of patients with dermal cGVHD. We show for the first time a role for MCs in skin cGVHD that may be targetable for preventive and therapeutic intervention in this disease.

Ruxolitinib for Therapy of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Objective

Steroid-resistant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major challenge after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is no therapeutic standard defined beyond calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids. Furthermore, some patients may have contraindications against CNI or high-dose steroids. Efficacy of ruxolitinib against GvHD has been described recently.

Methods

Ruxolitinib was used for treatment of acute or chronic GvHD in eight patients. The patients either needed intensification of therapy or had contraindications against use of CNI or high-dose steroids.

Results

Supplementation of therapy in acute GvHD with severe diarrhea with ruxolitinib was unsuccessful. All these patients died from acute GvHD. Introduction of ruxolitinib into therapy and relapse prophylaxis in other patients was successful in 4/4 cases (CR=3, PR=1). Indications for ruxolitinib were contraindications against CNI due to aHUS in two cases and the need for steroid sparing in two other cases. None of these patients suffered from diarrhea at the initiation of ruxolitinib.

Conclusion

Ruxolitinib was effective for therapy of acute and chronic GvHD in higher lines in patients without severe diarrhea. Ruxolitinib could replace successfully CNI and high-dose steroids. Further investigations are necessary to define the position of ruxolitinib in GvHD-therapy.

Life-Threatening Hypertriglyceridemia in a Patient on Ruxolitinib and Sirolimus for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Ruxolitinib is an oral selective Janus-associated kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor that was initially approved by the FDA in 2014 for treatment of myelofibrosis. In preclinical and retrospective clinical studies, use of ruxolitinib was shown to reduce graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) in allograft recipients with moderate/severe corticosteroid-dependent or refractory chronic GVHD. While the exact mechanism for action in GVHD is not yet fully understood, prospective studies are ongoing and some patients are receiving ruxolitinib in the setting of steroid refractory GVHD. Although ruxolitinib is generally well tolerated, here we describe a case involving a 50-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia and chronic GVHD who experienced life-threatening hypertriglyceridemia associated with concomitant use of sirolimus and ruxolitinib for GVHD. This case report highlights the importance of vigilance for severe side effects in novel immunosuppressive drug combinations.

"Phage Transplantation in Allotransplantation": Possible Treatment in Graft-Versus-Host Disease?

Graft-versus-host disease, both acute and chronic (aGvHD, cGvHD) remains a major complication in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and a significant therapeutic challenge, as many patients do not respond adequately to presently available therapy. Increasing antimicrobial resistance has greatly revived interest in using bacterial viruses (phages) to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In recent years, evidence has accumulated indicating that phages also have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. This article suggests how these anti-bacterial and immunomodulatory activities of phages may be translated into a novel treatment of acute GvHD.