1
|
Secaira-Morocho H, Chede A, Gonzalez-de-Salceda L, Garcia-Pichel F, Zhu Q. An evolutionary optimum amid moderate heritability in prokaryotic cell size. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114268. [PMID: 38776226 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
We investigate the distribution and evolution of prokaryotic cell size based on a compilation of 5,380 species. Size spans four orders of magnitude, from 100 nm (Mycoplasma) to more than 1 cm (Thiomargarita); however, most species congregate heavily around the mean. The distribution approximates but is distinct from log normality. Comparative phylogenetics suggests that size is heritable, yet the phylogenetic signal is moderate, and the degree of heritability is independent of taxonomic scale (i.e., fractal). Evolutionary modeling indicates the presence of an optimal cell size to which most species gravitate. The size is equivalent to a coccus of 0.70 μm in diameter. Analyses of 1,361 species with sequenced genomes show that genomic traits contribute to size evolution moderately and synergistically. Given our results, scaling theory, and empirical evidence, we discuss potential drivers that may expand or shrink cells around the optimum and propose a stability landscape model for prokaryotic cell size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Secaira-Morocho
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Abhinav Chede
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Luis Gonzalez-de-Salceda
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Ferran Garcia-Pichel
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
| | - Qiyun Zhu
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kut P, Garcia-Pichel F. Nimble vs. torpid responders to hydration pulse duration among soil microbes. Commun Biol 2024; 7:455. [PMID: 38609432 PMCID: PMC11015016 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06141-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Environmental parameters vary in time, and variability is inherent in soils, where microbial activity follows precipitation pulses. The expanded pulse-reserve paradigm (EPRP) contends that arid soil microorganisms have adaptively diversified in response to pulse regimes differing in frequency and duration. To test this, we incubate Chihuahuan Desert soil microbiomes under separate treatments in which 60 h of hydration was reached with pulses of different pulse duration (PD), punctuated by intervening periods of desiccation. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon data, we measure treatment effects on microbiome net growth, growth efficiency, diversity, and species composition, tracking the fate of 370 phylotypes (23% of those detected). Consistent with predictions, microbial diversity is a direct, saturating function of PD. Increasingly larger shifts in community composition are detected with decreasing PD, as specialist phylotypes become more prominent. One in five phylotypes whose fate was tracked responds consistently to PD, some preferring short pulses (nimble responders; NIRs) and some longer pulses (torpid responders; TORs). For pulses shorter than a day, microbiome growth efficiency is an inverse function of PD, as predicted. We conclude that PD in pulsed soil environments constitutes a major driver of microbial community assembly and function, largely consistent with the EPRP predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Kut
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Ferran Garcia-Pichel
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Biological soil crusts are thin, inconspicuous communities along the soil atmosphere ecotone that, until recently, were unrecognized by ecologists and even more so by microbiologists. In its broadest meaning, the term biological soil crust (or biocrust) encompasses a variety of communities that develop on soil surfaces and are powered by photosynthetic primary producers other than higher plants: cyanobacteria, microalgae, and cryptogams like lichens and mosses. Arid land biocrusts are the most studied, but biocrusts also exist in other settings where plant development is constrained. The minimal requirement is that light impinge directly on the soil; this is impeded by the accumulation of plant litter where plants abound. Since scientists started paying attention, much has been learned about their microbial communities, their composition, ecological extent, and biogeochemical roles, about how they alter the physical behavior of soils, and even how they inform an understanding of early life on land. This has opened new avenues for ecological restoration and agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferran Garcia-Pichel
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruvindy R, Barua A, Bolch CJS, Sarowar C, Savela H, Murray SA. Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms. ISME COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:70. [PMID: 37422553 PMCID: PMC10329664 DOI: 10.1038/s43705-023-00274-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
The application of meta-barcoding, qPCR, and metagenomics to aquatic eukaryotic microbial communities requires knowledge of genomic copy number variability (CNV). CNV may be particularly relevant to functional genes, impacting dosage and expression, yet little is known of the scale and role of CNV in microbial eukaryotes. Here, we quantify CNV of rRNA and a gene involved in Paralytic Shellfish Toxin (PST) synthesis (sxtA4), in 51 strains of 4 Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) species. Genomes varied up to threefold within species and ~7-fold amongst species, with the largest (A. pacificum, 130 ± 1.3 pg cell-1 /~127 Gbp) in the largest size category of any eukaryote. Genomic copy numbers (GCN) of rRNA varied by 6 orders of magnitude amongst Alexandrium (102- 108 copies cell-1) and were significantly related to genome size. Within the population CNV of rRNA was 2 orders of magnitude (105 - 107 cell-1) in 15 isolates from one population, demonstrating that quantitative data based on rRNA genes needs considerable caution in interpretation, even if validated against locally isolated strains. Despite up to 30 years in laboratory culture, rRNA CNV and genome size variability were not correlated with time in culture. Cell volume was only weakly associated with rRNA GCN (20-22% variance explained across dinoflagellates, 4% in Gonyaulacales). GCN of sxtA4 varied from 0-102 copies cell-1, was significantly related to PSTs (ng cell-1), displaying a gene dosage effect modulating PST production. Our data indicate that in dinoflagellates, a major marine eukaryotic group, low-copy functional genes are more reliable and informative targets for quantification of ecological processes than unstable rRNA genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rendy Ruvindy
- University of Technology Sydney, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Abanti Barua
- University of Technology Sydney, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Christopher J S Bolch
- Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Launceston, 7248, TAS, Australia
| | - Chowdhury Sarowar
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Chowder Bay Rd, Mosman, NSW, Australia
| | - Henna Savela
- University of Technology Sydney, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia
- Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Shauna A Murray
- University of Technology Sydney, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lara E, Singer D, Geisen S. Discrepancies between prokaryotes and eukaryotes need to be considered in soil DNA-based studies. Environ Microbiol 2022; 24:3829-3839. [PMID: 35437903 PMCID: PMC9790305 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.16019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Metabarcoding approaches are exponentially increasing our understanding of soil biodiversity, with a major focus on the bacterial part of the microbiome. Part of the soil diversity are also eukaryotes that include fungi, algae, protists and Metazoa. Nowadays, soil eukaryotes are targeted with the same approaches developed for bacteria and archaea (prokaryotes). However, fundamental differences exist between domains. After providing a short historical overview of the developments of metabarcoding applied to environmental microbiology, we compile the most important differences between domains that prevent direct method transfers between prokaryotic and eukaryotic soil metabarcoding approaches, currently dominated by short-read sequencing. These include the existence of divergent diversity concepts and the variations in eukaryotic morphology that affect sampling and DNA extraction. Furthermore, eukaryotes experienced much more variable evolutionary rates than prokaryotes, which prevent capturing the entire eukaryotic diversity in a soil with a single amplification protocol fit for short-read sequencing. In the final part we focus on future potentials for optimization of eukaryotic metabarcoding that include superior possibility of functionally characterizing eukaryotes and to extend the current information obtained, such as by adding a real quantitative component. This review should optimize future metabarcoding approaches targeting soil eukaryotes and kickstart this promising research direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Lara
- Real Jardín Botánico‐CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2Madrid28014Spain
| | - David Singer
- UMR CNRS 6112 LPG‐BIAFAngers University, 2 Boulevard LavoisierAngers49045France
| | - Stefan Geisen
- Laboratory of NematologyWageningen UniversityWageningen6700 AAThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin JL, Santi I, Pitta P, John U, Gypens N. Towards quantitative metabarcoding of eukaryotic plankton: an approach to improve 18S rRNA gene copy number bias. METABARCODING AND METAGENOMICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3897/mbmg.6.85794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Plankton metabarcoding is increasingly implemented in marine ecosystem assessments and is more cost-efficient and less time-consuming than monitoring based on microscopy (morphological). 18S rRNA gene is the most widely used marker for groups’ and species’ detection and classification within marine eukaryotic microorganisms. These datasets have commonly relied on the acquisition of organismal abundances directly from the number of DNA sequences (i.e. reads). Besides the inherent technical biases in metabarcoding, the largely varying 18S rRNA gene copy numbers (GCN) among marine protists (ranging from tens to thousands) is one of the most important biological biases for species quantification. In this work, we present a gene copy number correction factor (CF) for four marine planktonic groups: Bacillariophyta, Dinoflagellata, Ciliophora miscellaneous and flagellated cells. On the basis of the theoretical assumption that ‘1 read’ is equivalent to ‘1 GCN’, we used the GCN median values per plankton group to calculate the corrected cell number and biomass relative abundances. The species-specific absolute GCN per cell were obtained from various studies published in the literature. We contributed to the development of a species-specific 18S rRNA GCN database proposed by previous authors. To assess the efficiency of the correction factor we compared the metabarcoding, morphological and corrected relative abundances (in cell number and biomass) of 15 surface water samples collected in the Belgian Coastal Zone. Results showed that the application of the correction factor over metabarcoding results enables us to significantly improve the estimates of cell abundances for Dinoflagellata, Ciliophora and flagellated cells, but not for Bacillariophyta. This is likely to due to large biovolume plasticity in diatoms not corresponding to genome size and gene copy numbers. C-biomass relative abundance estimations directly from amplicon reads were only improved for Dinoflagellata and Ciliophora. The method is still facing biases related to the low number of species GCN assessed. Nevertheless, the increase of species in the GCN database may lead to the refinement of the proposed correction factor.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vasseur F, Westgeest AJ, Vile D, Violle C. Solving the grand challenge of phenotypic integration: allometry across scales. Genetica 2022; 150:161-169. [PMID: 35857239 PMCID: PMC9355930 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-022-00158-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Phenotypic integration is a concept related to the cascade of trait relationships from the lowest organizational levels, i.e. genes, to the highest, i.e. whole-organism traits. However, the cause-and-effect linkages between traits are notoriously difficult to determine. In particular, we still lack a mathematical framework to model the relationships involved in the integration of phenotypic traits. Here, we argue that allometric models developed in ecology offer testable mathematical equations of trait relationships across scales. We first show that allometric relationships are pervasive in biology at different organizational scales and in different taxa. We then present mechanistic models that explain the origin of allometric relationships. In addition, we emphasized that recent studies showed that natural variation does exist for allometric parameters, suggesting a role for genetic variability, selection and evolution. Consequently, we advocate that it is time to examine the genetic determinism of allometries, as well as to question in more detail the role of genome size in subsequent scaling relationships. More broadly, a possible-but so far neglected-solution to understand phenotypic integration is to examine allometric relationships at different organizational levels (cell, tissue, organ, organism) and in contrasted species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Vasseur
- CEFE, University Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
| | | | - Denis Vile
- LEPSE, University Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | - Cyrille Violle
- CEFE, University Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandes VMC, Rudgers JA, Collins SL, Garcia-Pichel F. Rainfall pulse regime drives biomass and community composition in biological soil crusts. Ecology 2022; 103:e3744. [PMID: 35522227 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Future climates will alter the frequency and size of rain events in drylands, potentially affecting soil microbes that generate carbon feedbacks to climate, but field tests are rare. Topsoils in drylands are commonly colonized by biological soil crusts (biocrusts), photosynthesis-based communities that provide services ranging from soil fertilization to stabilization against erosion. We quantified responses of biocrust microbial communities to twelve years of altered rainfall regimes, with 60 mm of additional rain per year delivered either as small (5 mm) weekly rains or large (20 mm) monthly rains during the summer monsoon season. Rain addition promoted microbial diversity, suppressed the dominant cyanobacterium, Microcoleus vaginatus, and enhanced nitrogen-fixing taxa, but did not consistently increase microbial biomass. The addition of many small rain events increased microbial biomass, whereas few, large events did not. These results alter the physiological paradigm that biocrusts are most limited by the amount of rainfall and instead predict that regimes enriched in small rain events will boost cyanobacterial biocrusts and enhance their beneficial services to drylands. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M C Fernandes
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, AZ, USA.,Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | - Scott L Collins
- Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Ferran Garcia-Pichel
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|