Interpersonal reactivity index adaptation among expectant seroconcordant couples with HIV in Zambézia Province, Mozambique

Is pain empathy associated with pain indices and trauma history? A comparison between patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment and healthy controls

BACKGROUND

To study whether pain empathy and theory of mind (ToM) are related to pain indices and trauma experience, we studied opioid users receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), a population with a history of traumas and a high prevalence of chronic pain.

METHODS

MMT patients (n = 53), substance abuse-free, with no impaired cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≥24), were compared to healthy controls (HC) matched by age and gender (n = 66). All participants were assessed using Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RMET) for ToM, empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index [IRI], Empathy Quotient Scale for Adults [EQ60]), and Pain Empathy [PE task]). An algometer was used for pain pressure threshold, and supra-pain threshold was rated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Catastrophizing, McGill pain, Negative life events (NLE), and MoCA questionnaires were administered. Substance abuse was tested in the urine of MMT patients and self-reported by HC.

RESULTS

MMT, compared to HC, were less educated with more NLE and a lower RMET (logistic regression). Groups had comparable empathy and pain indices, except for higher supra-threshold VAS rating and catastrophizing in univariate analyses. Pain empathy (PE) correlated with NLE in HC, and in MMT, with catastrophizing, which correlated with NLE, perceived stress, and pain intensity. Higher empathy was observed in 18 participants with a history of sexual abuse (83.3 % belong to the MMT group).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain Empathy was found to be associated with personal suffering experience in both groups, as reflected by correlations with NLE in HC and with catastrophizing, which correlates with NLE, stress, and pain intensity, in MMT.

Impact of student-run clinic participation on empathy and interprofessional skills development in medical and pharmacy students

Background

Students participating in student-run clinics (SRCs) have opportunities to develop and practice beneficial skill sets, including empathy and interprofessional collaboration.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess whether participation in an underserved SRC impacts the development of empathy and interprofessional skills in pharmacy and medical students.

Methods

This study assessed empathy and interprofessional skills development through a self-assessment survey. The survey included the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess empathy, the Attitudes Towards Health Care Teams/Team Skills Scale (ATHCTS/TSS) to assess interprofessional team dynamics, and a free-text response section. Participants were grouped based on whether they participated in the SRC (intervention group) or did not participate in the SRC (control group). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the participants' discipline (medicine vs. pharmacy). To compare differences in IRI, ATHCTS, and TSS scores between study groups, independent samples t-tests were performed. A thematic analysis was used for qualitative data.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups in IRI, ATHCTS, or TSS scores. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in scores of student pharmacists or medical students. For both disciplines, the thematic analysis revealed the most common positive themes identified were "real-world patient interaction and care," "impact on practice/career development." Alternatively, it revealed the highest reported negative themes identified as "time management and operational difficulties" and "concerns about the quality of/access to care".

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that involvement in an SRC neither improves nor hinders a learner's development of empathy and interprofessional team skills. Qualitatively, students reported that participation in an SRC benefited their learning and helped develop their skills, like empathy and team dynamics, in an interprofessional setting. Future research with longitudinal monitoring or alternative assessment tools is recommended.

Dyadic Validation of Relational Processes in Seroconcordant Mozambican Couples: Social Support, Physician Trust, and Stigma

Psychometric instruments can quantify how people living with HIV experience three key barriers to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and retention: partner support, trust in medical professionals, and internalized HIV-related stigma. However, two challenges arise when using these instruments to measure and interpret relational processes among Mozambican couples, especially those participating in a couples intervention. First, relational measures have almost exclusively been developed and normed with Western, middle-class, and/or White adults. Second, traditional measurement approaches neglect the relational processes between partners. Using dyadic modeling, this paper demonstrates metric and scalar invariance for instruments measuring partner support (CFI = 0.964, TLI = 0.965, RMSEA = 0.034, SRMR = 0.052), trust in medical professionals (CFI = 0.978, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.033, SRMR = 0.039), and internalized HIV-related stigma (CFI = 0.960, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.060) within the novel context of seroconcordant HIV+ couples in Zambézia province.

Ease of marital communication and depressive symptom severity among men and women in rural Uganda: cross-sectional, whole-population study

PURPOSE

Depression is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. The extent to which marital communication may influence depression in contexts with little mental health support is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a whole-population study of married adult residents of eight villages in a rural region of southwestern Uganda. Depression symptom severity was measured using a modified version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist for Depression, with > 1.75 classified as a positive screen for probable depression. Respondents were asked to report about ease of marital communication ('never easy', 'easy once in a while', 'easy most of the time' or 'always easy'). Sex-stratified, multivariable Poisson regression models were fit to estimate the association between depression symptom severity and marital communication.

RESULTS

Among 492 female and 447 male participants (response rate = 96%), 23 women and 5 men reported communication as 'never easy' and 154 women and 72 men reported it as 'easy once in a while'. Reporting communication as 'never easy' was associated with an increased risk of probable depression among women (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.93, p = 0.028) and among men (ARR, 7.10; 95% CI 1.70-29.56, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

In this whole-population study of married adults in rural Uganda, difficulty of marital communication was associated with depression symptom severity. Additional research is needed to assess whether communication training facilitated by local leaders or incorporated into couples-based services might be a novel pathway to address mental health burden.