Long-term survival after hepatectomy for metachronous liver metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case report

Long-Term Survival after Curative Resection for Postoperative Dissemination of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a very poor prognosis and high mortality. The prognosis for recurrence after surgery is extremely poor. Resection for disseminations of PDAC is not recommended.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 69-year-old woman with a pancreatic tumor that was detected with computed tomography (CT) during a postoperative colon cancer checkup. She was suspected of having pancreatic body cancer without distant metastasis. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection was performed. Postoperative pathological examination revealed an invasive ductal adenocarcinoma with lymph node metastasis (pT4N1M0, stage III). Postoperatively, she received adjuvant chemotherapy containing gemcitabine and S-1 for 1 year and 4 months, and S-1 monotherapy for 1 year. Six years and 2 months after the initial surgery, her serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level elevated, and CT revealed soft tissue in front of the left kidney. Positron emission tomography/CT also revealed high fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the tissue. Accordingly, the patient was diagnosed with dissemination of PDAC. The patient was administered chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1. One year and 6 months after the diagnosis of dissemination, CT revealed reduction of the nodule. Therefore, we decided to eliminate this dissemination. A left nephrectomy and partial gastrectomy were performed. Histopathological examination confirmed dissemination of PDAC. The patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy. No evidence of recurrence has been observed for 13 years and 3 months since the initial surgery, and 5 years and 1 month since the resection of the dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

This case showed a recurrence of dissemination after radical PDAC surgery, and the patient showed long-term survival without recurrence after dissemination resection. Resection of dissemination may confer long-term survival in selected patients.

Defining oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and critical synthesis of consensus

BACKGROUND

Small retrospective series suggest that local consolidative treatment (LCT) may improve survival in oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, no uniform definition of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in PDAC exists; this impedes meaningful conclusions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL registries for studies and protocols reporting on definitions and/or LCT of OMD in PDAC was performed. The primary endpoint was the definition of OMD. Levels of agreement were categorized as consensus (≥75% agreement between studies), fair agreement (50%-74%), and absent/poor agreement (<50%).

RESULTS

After screening of 5374 abstracts, the full text of 218 studies was assessed, of which 76 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The majority of studies were retrospective (n = 66, 87%), two were prospective studies and eight were study protocols. Studies investigated mostly liver (n = 38, 51%) and lung metastases (n = 15, 20%). Across studies, less than one-half (n = 32, 42%) reported a definition of OMD, while 44 (58%) did not. Involvement was limited to a single organ (consensus). Additional criteria for defining OMD were the number of lesions (consensus), metastatic site (poor agreement), metastatic size (poor agreement), treatment possibilities (poor agreement), and biomarker response (poor agreement). Liver OMD could involve three or fewer lesions (consensus) and synchronous disease (fair agreement), while lung metastases could involve two or fewer lesions and metachronous disease (consensus). The large majority of studies were at a high risk of bias or did not include any control groups.

CONCLUSION

Definitions of OMD were not used or varied widely between studies hampering across-study comparability and highlighting an unmet need for a consensus. The present study is part of a multistep process that aims to develop an interdisciplinary consensus on OMD in pancreatic cancer.

Surgical resection for liver recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of surgical resection for liver recurrence in patients with curatively resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with a liver recurrence after undergoing curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors were analyzed, as was the clinical impact of surgical resection for liver recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 502 patients underwent curative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. Of the 311 patients with recurrence after curative pancreatectomy, 71 (23%) had an initial recurrence in the liver, with 35 having solitary recurrence (11%). Patients with solitary, two or three, or more than four recurrences had median overall survival times of 28.5, 18.0, and 12.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Surgical indications for liver recurrence in our institution included solitary tumor, good disease control under chemotherapy after recurrence for > 6 months, and sufficient remnant liver function. Ten patients who met our institutional policy inclusion criteria underwent liver resection. Among 35 patients with initially solitary liver recurrence, those who underwent liver resection outlived those who did not (57.6 months vs. 20.1 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of overall survival, solitary liver recurrence and liver resection were independent favorable prognostic factors in patients with initial liver recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with solitary liver recurrence after curatively resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, liver resection may be a treatment option.

Curative resection after chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrence of pancreatic tail cancer in the abdominal wall: a case report

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence and metastasis to the liver, peritoneum, and lung are the most common recurrent patterns of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after radical resection. Recurrence in the abdominal wall is extremely rare. Herein, we report our experience with a patient who had recurrent PDAC in the abdominal wall with long-term survival by means of multidisciplinary therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 76-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed with resectable pancreatic tail cancer. She underwent distal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy after two cycles of gemcitabine plus S-1 as neoadjuvant therapy. She also received eight cycles of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, imaging examinations identified a mass suggesting recurrence in the abdominal wall at the middle wound that involved the transverse colon. After two cycles of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, chemoradiotherapy (S-1 plus 45 Gy) and seven cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) were administered. The patient did not develop any new recurrent lesions during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, the recurrent lesion in the abdominal wall and the involved transverse colon were resected. We confirmed the lack of peritoneal dissemination during surgery. Pathological examination revealed that the resected lesion was metastasis of primary PDAC, and the surgical margin was 1 mm. However, re-recurrence localized in the abdominal wall was detected 9 months later. The re-recurrent lesion was diagnosed as local recurrence of the first recurrent lesion. We performed a second resection of the abdominal wall using a femoral myocutaneous flap to achieve sufficient surgical margin. The pathological findings of the resected specimen were the same as those of the previous specimens, and the resection margin was negative. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Seven years after the initial surgery and 3 years and 7 months after the third surgery, the patient is alive with no signs of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival could be achieved by radical resection with sufficient surgical margins for recurrence of PDAC in the abdominal wall if new other recurrent lesions, including peritoneal dissemination, are prevented through chemotherapy.