Percutaneous treatment of IVC obstruction due to post-resection hepatic torsion associated with IVC thrombosis

Inferior and Superior Vena Cava Reconstruction

Obstructions of the superior and inferior vena cava are prevalent etiologies of deep venous obstruction, presenting a spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from life-threatening conditions to asymptomatic states. The etiological diversity inherent to these central venous obstructions necessitates a subtle approach to their diagnosis and management. This discrepancy in clinical presentations emphasizes the importance of a differentiated diagnostic and therapeutic strategy, tailored to the specific form of vena cava obstruction encountered. This article aims to delineate the various manifestations of vena cava obstruction and encourages specific diagnostic and treatment pathways.

Adrenalectomy for the treatment of hypotension in a cat with phaeochromocytoma associated with caudal vena cava syndrome

An 11-year-old spayed female, Persian cat was referred to the Jeonbuk Animal Medical Center for evaluation of a 2-month history of lethargy and anorexia. Physical examination revealed tachycardia and hypotension. Abdominal imaging via sonography and CT identified a right adrenal gland mass causing severe deviation and compression of the caudal vena cava. After stabilising the blood pressure and heart rate through positive inotropes and fluid therapy, right adrenalectomy was performed. Surgery confirmed the adrenal gland mass was severely compressing the caudal vena cava. Histopathological examination revealed that the mass was a pheochromocytoma. After adrenalectomy, blood pressure and heart rate stabilised and remained unaffected 8 months postsurgery. This report describes a rare case of an adrenal pheochromocytoma leading to caudal vena cava compression in a cat presenting with hypotension.

Endovascular treatment of symptomatic hepatic venous outflow obstruction post major liver resection

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and outcomes of endovascular treatment of hepatic vein stenosis post major liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis was performed including all interventional treatments of hepatic vein stenosis post major liver resection since 2010. Post procedural course and clinical parameters including amount of ascites accumulation and relevant laboratory values were assessed during the follow-up period. Primary and primary assisted hepatic venous patency time were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (median age 55.5, IQR 49.75 to 61.5 years) undergoing a total of 16 interventions were included. Interventions were primary stent placement (n = 3), primary balloon angioplasty (n = 8), three re-interventions and two aborted interventions (no significant pressure gradient). Technical success was 100% (16/16). Permanent reduction and / or complete resolution of ascites was achieved in 72% (8/11). Laboratory parameters related to liver function did not show significant improvement after intervention. Median follow-up period was 6 months (IQR: 1.5 to 18 months). The median primary patency time for patients with balloon angioplasty was 11 months (IQR: 1.375 to 22.25 months) and assisted patency time was 13.25 months (IQR: 4.5 to 22.25 months). The median primary patency time for patients with angioplasty and stent placement was 1 months (IQR: 1.0 to 1.5 months) and assisted patency time was 2.0 months (IQR: 1.5 to 2.5months).

CONCLUSION

An endovascular approach for the treatment of hepatic venous stenosis post major liver resection is safe and efficient to reduce and / or resolve refractory ascites. However, liver function parameters seem not to be improved by the procedure. Stent placement can be a reasonable option in patients with significant residual stenotic disease post angioplasty.

A case of hepatic venous outflow obstruction caused by migration of the remnant liver into the subphrenic space after extended posterior sectionectomy of the liver

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a rare complication of hepatectomy. We report a case of HVOO caused by remnant liver migration into the subphrenic space after hepatectomy, which was successfully managed by repositioning of the remnant liver.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 55-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with a liver tumor on ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed early enhancement in the arterial phase, followed by a washout in the late phase. Preoperative diagnosis was hepatocellular carcinoma, and hand-assisted laparoscopic extended posterior sectionectomy was performed. On postoperative day 1, middle hepatic vein (MHV) flow was not detected on ultrasound, and the portal flow was hepatofugal. CT during arterial portography revealed absence of the portal flow to the medial and anterior sections, and remnant liver migration into the subphrenic space. Therefore, we suspected that HVOO was caused by the remnant liver migration and performed redo laparotomy to reposition the remnant liver with suturing of the falciform ligament to the anterior abdominal wall. Postoperatively, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated that the remnant liver remained in the anatomical position, and the medial and anterior sections were well enhanced.

DISCUSSION

HVOO might occur irrespective of whether the left triangular ligament is preserved. We believe that it is necessary to fix the remnant liver to the abdominal wall in cases with poor venous blood flow confirmed by intraoperative ultrasound. If kinking of the hepatic vein persists, stent insertion should be performed.

CONCLUSION

HVOO after hepatectomy is rare but potentially fatal, and prevention and countermeasures should be discussed.