Efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for delayed hepatic artery post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage: development of extrahepatic collateral circulation and complications of post endovascular therapy

Hemorrhage Sites and Mitigation Strategies After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Importance

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinical evidence often draws suspicion to the gastroduodenal artery stump, even without a clear source.

Objective

To determine the frequency of gastroduodenal artery bleeding compared to other sites and the results of mitigation strategies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2011 to 2021 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH).

Exposures

Demographic, perioperative, and disease-related variables.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The incidence, location, treatment, and outcomes of primary (initial) and secondary (recurrent) hemorrhage requiring invasive intervention were analyzed. Imaging studies were re-reviewed by interventional radiologists to confirm sites.

Results

Inclusion criteria were met by 3040 patients (n = 1761 MSK, n = 1279 TJUH). Patients from both institutions were similar in age (median [IQR] age at MSK, 67 [59-74] years, and at TJUH, 68 [60-75] years) and sex (at MSK, 814 female [46.5%] and 947 male [53.8%], and at TJUH, 623 [48.7%] and 623 male [51.3%]). Primary hemorrhage occurred in 90 patients (3.0%), of which the gastroduodenal artery was the source in 15 (16.7%), unidentified sites in 24 (26.7%), and non-gastroduodenal artery sites in 51 (56.7%). Secondary hemorrhage occurred in 23 patients; in 4 (17.4%), the gastroduodenal artery was the source. Of all hemorrhage events (n = 117), the gastroduodenal artery was the source in 19 (16.2%, 0.63% incidence in all pancreaticoduodenectomies). Gastroduodenal artery hemorrhage was more often associated with soft gland texture (14 [93.3%] vs 41 [62.1%]; P = .02) and later presentation (median [IQR], 21 [15-26] vs 10 days [5-18]; P = .002). Twenty-three patients underwent empirical gastroduodenal artery embolization or stent placement, 7 (30.4%) of whom subsequently experienced secondary hemorrhage. Twenty percent of all gastroduodenal artery embolizations/stents (8/40 patients), including 13% (3/13 patients) of empirical treatments, were associated with significant morbidity (7 hepatic infarction, 4 biliary stricture), with a 90-day mortality rate of 38.5% (n = 5) for patients with these complications vs 7.8% without (n = 6; P = .008). Ninety-day mortality was 12.2% (n = 11) for patients with hemorrhage (3 patients [20%] with primary gastroduodenal vs 8 [10.7%] for all others; P = .38) compared with 2% (n = 59) for patients without hemorrhage.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was uncommon and the spectrum was broad, with the gastroduodenal artery responsible for a minority of bleeding events. Empirical gastroduodenal artery embolization/stent without obvious sequelae of recent hemorrhage was associated with significant morbidity and rebleeding and should not be routine practice. Successful treatment of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage requires careful assessment of all potential sources, even after gastroduodenal artery mitigation.

Targeted versus Empiric Embolization for Delayed Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study of 312 Patients

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of empiric embolization (EE) compared with targeted embolization (TE) in the treatment of delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of patients with delayed PPH between January 2012 and August 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 312 consecutive patients (59.6 years ± 10.8; 239 men) were included. The group was stratified into 3 cohorts according to angiographic results and treatment strategies: TE group, EE group, and no embolization (NE) group. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was implemented for comparing the clinical success and 30-day mortality. The variables related to clinical failure and 30-day mortality were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Clinical success of transcatheter arterial embolization was achieved in 70.0% (170/243) of patients who underwent embolization. There was no statistical difference in clinical success and 30-day mortality between the EE and TE groups. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that malignant disease (odds ratio [OR] = 5.76), Grade C pancreatic fistula (OR = 7.59), intra-abdominal infection (OR = 2.54), and concurrent extraluminal and intraluminal hemorrhage (OR = 2.52) were risk factors for clinical failure. Moreover, 33 patients (13.6%) died within 30 days after embolization. Advanced age (OR = 2.59) and intra-abdominal infection (OR = 5.55) were identified as risk factors for 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

EE is safe and as effective as TE in preventing rebleeding and mortality in patients with angiographically negative delayed PPH.

Coronary covered stents in the management of late-onset arterial complications post-hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety, efficacy, and late clinical outcome of coronary covered stent placement for the treatment of late-onset arterial complications after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with post-hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery-related arterial lesions and subsequently treated with a covered coronary stent in the authors institution between January 2012 and November 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were technical and clinical success; secondary endpoints were covered stent patency and end-organ perfusion of the affected artery.

RESULTS

The study included 22 patients (13 men and 9 women) with a mean age of 67 years ± 9.6 years. Initial surgery included pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 15; 68%), liver transplantation (n = 2; 9%), left hepatectomy (n = 1; 5%), bile duct resection (n = 1; 5%), hepatogastrostomy (n = 1; 5%), and segmental enterectomy (n = 1; 5%). Technically, coronary covered stents were successfully placed in n = 22 patients (100%) without immediate complication. Definitive bleeding control was observed in n = 18 patients (81.1%) with recurrent bleeding within 30 days postintervention in n = 5 patients (23%). No ischemic liver or biliary complications occurred during the follow-up period. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSION

Coronary covered stents are a safe and efficient treatment option in most of the patients presenting with late-onset postoperative arterial injuries following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery and are associated with an acceptable recurrent bleeding rate and no late, ischemic, parenchymal complications.