Worse outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in acute hematogenous infections than in postsurgical infections after total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter study

Double DAIR Protocol for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A 15-Year Institutional Experience

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the double debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) using antibiotic-loaded bone cement beads for the treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has gained traction following promising reports in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of this protocol and identify predictors of failure following completion of a double DAIR procedure.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified all patients who underwent a double DAIR protocol for the management of acute PJI (≤ 28 days from either index arthroplasty or symptom onset) at a single institution. Acute PJI was defined using the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. All patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Treatment failure was defined as either reoperation secondary to infection, PJI-related mortality, or signs of persistent infection at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 128 patients (69 knees, 59 hips) included in the final analyses. At a mean follow-up time of 4.8 ± 3.9 years, 86.1% of infected primaries and 71.4% of infected revision patients were found to have experienced treatment success. When adjusting for covariates, multivariate regression analyses identified revision arthroplasty (OR [odds ratio], 7.6; P = 0.002), acute hematogenous PJI (OR, 7.1; P = 0.048), and positive culture at second debridement (OR, 5.0; P = 0.039) as independent predictors of failure following completion of a double DAIR procedure.

CONCLUSION

We found that 86.1% of infected primaries and 71.4% of infected revisions that received a double DAIR for acute PJI were infection-free at the latest follow-up. Upon regression analyses, revision arthroplasty, acute hematogenous PJI, and a positive culture at second debridement were found to be independent predictors of treatment failure in this patient population.

Risk Factors for Failure to Eradicate Infection after Single Arthroscopic Debridement in Septic Arthritis of a Native Knee Joint

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors and effect of empirical glycopeptide on the failure of single arthroscopic debridement for septic knee arthritis in a native knee joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement for septic knee arthritis from March 2005 to December 2022 at one institution were included in this study. Demographic data, comorbidities, preoperative factors including history of previous surgery, history of injection, laboratory data including preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count, isolated pathogens from synovial fluid culture, and Gachter stage were analyzed. Statistical analyses using univariate and logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

Out of 132 patients, 17 patients (12.9%) had more than one additional arthroscopic debridement. History of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p<0.001), previous injection (p=0.041), isolated Staphylococcus aureus in synovial fluid (p=0.010), and high Gachter stage (p=0.002) were identified as risk factors, whereas age, history of previous knee surgery at the affected knee, CRP level, preoperative WBC, and preoperative neutrophil count of synovial fluid had no significant relation. Logistic regression analysis showed significant increase of risk in patients with DM [odds ratio (OR) 12.002, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.243-44.418, p<0.001], previous injection history (OR 4.812, 95% CI 1.367-16.939, p=0.017), and isolation of Staphylococcus aureus in synovial fluid (OR 4.804, 95% CI 1.282-18.001, p=0.031) as independent risk factors for failure of infection eradication after single arthroscopic debridement.

CONCLUSION

Comorbidity of DM, history of previous injection, isolated Staphylococcus aureus in synovial fluid, and high Gachter stage were associated with a higher risk of failure to eradicate infection with a single arthroscopic procedure. Empirical glycopeptide administration also showed no significant benefit in reducing the risk of additional surgical procedures for infection control, suggesting against the routine administration of glycopeptide.

Differences of microbial growth and biofilm formation among periprosthetic joint infection-causing species: an animal study

PURPOSE

The most frequently used surgical procedures for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), as well as single- or two-stage revision arthroplasty. The choice of surgery is made depending on the full maturation of the biofilm layer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biofilm formation and microbial growth using common PJI-causing agents and compare its development on the implant surface.

METHODS

The in vivo study was performed using 40 Sprague-Dawley rats divided into five groups (n = 8/group): Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and control. Six standard titanium alloy discs were placed into the subcutaneous air pouches of the interscapular areas of the rats. After the inoculation of microorganisms, disc and soft tissue cultures were collected at 2-week intervals for 6 weeks, and the microbial load and the microscopic appearance of the biofilm were compared.

RESULTS

The disc samples from the S. aureus group had the highest infection load at all time points; however, in soft tissue samples, this was only observed at week 4 and 6. Electron microscopic images showed no distinctive differences in the biofilm structures between the groups.

CONCLUSION

S. aureus microbial burden was significantly higher in implant cultures at week 2 compared to other PJI-causing agents examined. These results may explain the higher failure rate seen if the DAIR procedure was performed at < 3-4 weeks after the PJI symptom onset and support the observation that DAIR may not be effective against PJIs caused by S. aureus.

Perioperative Demographic and Laboratory Characteristics of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: Can We Determine Which Patients Will Fail?

BACKGROUND

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) are the mainstays surgical treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, reoperation following DAIR is common and the risk factors for DAIR failure remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the perioperative characteristics of patients who failed initial DAIR treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 83 patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI within 3 months following index surgery from 2011 to 2022, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Surgical outcomes were categorized using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society outcome reporting tool (Tiers 1 to 4). Patient demographics, laboratory data, and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who had failed (Tiers 3 and 4) (n = 32) and successful (Tiers 1 and 2) (n = 51) DAIR treatment. Logistic regression was also performed.

RESULTS

After logistic regression, Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57; P = .003), preoperative C-reactive protein (OR: 1.06; P = .014), synovial white blood cell (OR: 1.14; P = .008), and polymorphonuclear cell (PMN%) counts (OR: 1.05; P = .015) were independently associated with failed DAIR. Compared with total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty patients (OR: 6.08; P = .001) were at increased risk of DAIR failure. The type of organism and time from primary surgery were not correlated with DAIR failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had failed initial DAIR tended to have significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell, and PMN%. The total knee arthroplasty DAIRs were more likely to fail than the total hip arthroplasty DAIRs. These characteristics should be considered when planning acute PJI management, as certain patients may be at higher risk for DAIR failure and may benefit from other surgical treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Early-Outcome Differences between Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections-A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are serious complications after arthroplasty, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and complex treatment processes. The outcomes of different PJI entities are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to access the early outcomes of different PJI entities. A retrospective, single-center study was conducted. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with PJI treated between 2018 and 2019 were evaluated 12 months after the completion of treatment. Primary endpoints were mortality, relapse free survival (RFS) and postoperative complications (kidney failure, sepsis, admission to ICU). A total of 115 cases were included [19.1% early (EI), 33.0% acute late (ALI), and 47.8% chronic infections (CI)]. Patients with ALI were older (p = 0.023), had higher ASA scores (p = 0.031), preoperative CRP concentrations (p = 0.011), incidence of kidney failure (p = 0.002) and sepsis (p = 0.026). They also tended towards higher in-house mortality (ALI 21.1%, 13.6% EI, 5.5% CI) and admission to ICU (ALI 50.0%, 22.7% EI, 30.9% CI). At 12 months, 15.4% of patients with EI had a relapse, compared to 38.1% in ALI and 36.4% in CI. There are differences in patient characteristics and early outcomes between PJI entities. Patients with EI have better early clinical outcomes. Patients with ALI require special attention during follow-up because they have higher occurrences of relapses and postoperative complications than patients with EI and CI.

Hydrogel Coating versus Calcium Sulphate Beads as a Local Antibiotic Carrier for Debridement Procedures in Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Preliminary Study

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are among the most difficult complications to treat in orthopaedic surgery. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) represent an efficient strategy for acute PJI, especially when resorbable local antibiotic carriers and coatings are used. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the difference between using antibiotic-loaded hydrogel (ALH) and calcium sulphate (CS) beads in the DAIR procedure. We analysed 16 patients who had been treated since 2018 for acute PJI, namely eight patients with knee PJI (50%), seven with hip PJI (43.7%), and one with shoulder PJI (6.2%). Nine patients were treated with the Debridement, Antibiotic Coating and Retention of the Implant (DACRI) method, while seven were treated with the Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) method. We found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, the American Society of Anesthesiologists risk score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, localisation, days from onset to diagnosis and pathogenesis. Furthermore, no differences were found between the DACRI and DAPRI groups in terms of infection control (15 patients, 93.75% with p = 0.36) and last C-Reactive Protein values (p = 0.26), with a mean follow-up of 26.1 ± 7.7 months. Treatment for one patient affected by knee Candida albicans PJI in the DACRI group was not successful. In conclusion, DAPRI and DACRI appear to be safe and effective treatments for PJIs. This evidence will encourage the development of new clinical research into local carriers and coatings for use in acute implant-associated infections.

Machine Learning for Detecting Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Loosening on Plain Radiographs

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the loosening of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants could be detected accurately on plain radiographs using a deep convolution neural network (CNN). (2) Methods: We analyzed data for 100 patients who underwent revision TKA due to prosthetic loosening at a single institution from 2012 to 2020. We extracted 100 patients who underwent primary TKA without loosening through a propensity score, matching for age, gender, body mass index, operation side, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Transfer learning was used to prepare a detection model using a pre-trained Visual Geometry Group (VGG) 19. For transfer learning, two methods were used. First, the fully connected layer was removed, and a new fully connected layer was added to construct a new model. The convolutional layer was frozen without training, and only the fully connected layer was trained (transfer learning model 1). Second, a new model was constructed by adding a fully connected layer and varying the range of freezing for the convolutional layer (transfer learning model 2). (3) Results: The transfer learning model 1 gradually increased in accuracy and ultimately reached 87.5%. After processing through the confusion matrix, the sensitivity was 90% and the specificity was 100%. Transfer learning model 2, which was trained on the convolutional layer, gradually increased in accuracy and ultimately reached 97.5%, which represented a better improvement than for model 1. Processing through the confusion matrix affirmed that the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 97.5%. (4) Conclusions: The CNN algorithm, through transfer learning, shows high accuracy for detecting the loosening of TKA implants on plain radiographs.

Palliative arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation for infected total knee arthroplasty in high mortality risk patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the infection control rate of palliative arthroscopic debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the high mortality risk or terminal cancer stage patients.

METHODS

From March 2018 to August 2021, 21 patients met the following inclusion criteria: old age of more than 80, diagnosed as a terminal stage of cancer, high risk of mortality and morbidity representing as Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 5, low daily activity with disabled extremity, and re-infection after two-stage revision. Each patient underwent arthroscopic DAIR and additional continuous irrigation for 48 hours. The need for subsequent re-arthroscopic DAIR or two-stage revision was determined by the post-operative trends of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Infection control was defined as continuing controlled status of infection based on clinical and laboratory results by one or two times of arthroscopic DAIR within initial two months. Treatment failure was defined as more than three times arthroscopic debridement, two-stage revision surgery, or expired due to uncontrolled infection.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic DAIR controlled the infection in 19 (90.5%) of the 21 cases. The other knee underwent a total of three times of re-arthroscopic DAIR and the other one underwent two-stage revision. Although five patients expired during the follow-up period due to worsening medical problems or terminal cancer, there were no deaths from uncontrolled infection, sepsis, or surgery-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation for the infection TKA with high mortality risk or terminal cancer patients showed a 90.5% infection control rate. For high-risk patients, arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation can be an alternative treatment to improve the quality of life during survival.