The effect of a hinged ankle foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: objective measures and users' opinions

Articulated ankle-foot-orthosis improves inter-limb propulsion symmetry during walking adaptability task post-stroke

BACKGROUND

Community ambulation involves complex walking adaptability tasks such as stepping over obstacles or taking long steps, which require adequate propulsion generation by the trailing leg. Individuals post-stroke often have an increased reliance on their trailing nonparetic leg and favor leading with their paretic leg, which can limit mobility. Ankle-foot-orthoses are prescribed to address common deficits post-stroke such as foot drop and ankle instability. However, it is not clear if walking with an ankle-foot-orthosis improves inter-limb propulsion symmetry during adaptability tasks. This study sought to examine this hypothesis.

METHODS

Individuals post-stroke (n = 9) that were previously prescribed a custom fabricated plantarflexion-stop articulated ankle-foot-orthosis participated. Participants performed steady-state walking and adaptability tasks overground with and without their orthosis. The adaptability tasks included obstacle crossing and long-step tasks, leading with both their paretic and nonparetic leg. Inter-limb propulsion symmetry was calculated using trailing limb ground-reaction-forces.

FINDINGS

During the obstacle crossing task, ankle-foot-orthosis use resulted in a significant improvement in inter-limb propulsion symmetry. The orthosis also improved ankle dorsiflexion during stance, reduced knee hyperextension, increased gastrocnemius muscle activity, and increased peak paretic leg ankle plantarflexor moment. In contrast, there were no differences in propulsion symmetry during steady-state walking and taking a long-step when using the orthosis.

INTERPRETATION

Plantarflexion-stop articulated ankle-foot-orthoses can improve propulsion symmetry during obstacle crossing tasks in individuals post-stroke, promoting paretic leg use and reduced reliance on the nonparetic leg.

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis on gait pattern and spatiotemporal indices during treadmill walking in hemiparetic stroke

Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is known to correct abnormal gait patterns and improve walking stability and speed in patients with hemiparesis. To quantify these benefits in post-stroke gait, a three-dimensional motion analysis of gait pattern was conducted. Forty patients with hemiparesis were enrolled. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze patients' treadmill walking with/without an AFO. Outcome measures were 12 abnormal gait indices (forefoot contact, knee extensor thrust, retropulsion of the hip, flexed-knee gait, medial whip in the stance phase, circumduction gait, hip hiking, insufficient knee flexion during the swing phase, excessive lateral shifting of the trunk, contralateral vaulting, excessive hip external rotation, and posterior pelvic tilt), calculated using kinematic data and spatiotemporal indices, and the symmetry index of double-stance and single-stance time and step length. Forefoot contact (without AFO vs. with AFO: 71.0 vs. 65.8, P < 0.001), circumduction gait (65.0 vs. 57.9, P < 0.001), and contralateral vaulting (78.2 vs. 72.2, P = 0.003) were significantly reduced, whereas excessive hip external rotation (53.7 vs. 62.8, P = 0.003) significantly increased during walking with an AFO. Hip hiking (77.1 vs. 71.7) showed marginal reduction with the use of AFO ( P = 0.096). The absolute symmetry index of double-stance time (21.9 vs. 16.1, P = 0.014) significantly decreased during walking with an AFO. AFO effectively mitigates abnormal gait patterns typical of hemiparetic gait. A 3D motion analysis system with clinically oriented indices can help assess intervention efficacy for gait abnormalities.

The effect of a modified elastic band orthosis on gait and balance in stroke survivors

BACKGROUND

Gait is crucial for independent living for stroke survivors and assistive devices have been developed to support gait performance. Ankle foot orthosis (AFOs) are commonly provided to stroke survivors to prevent foot drop during walking. However, previous studies have reported limitations of AFOs including them being too heavy, creating skin irritation, and being a stigma of disability.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to compare the gait and balance improvement between elastic band orthosis (EBOs) and AFOs.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study design.

METHODS

The AFOs and EBOs were provided to 17 stroke survivors, and changes in gait and balance were assessed compared to barefoot (control). Gait spatiotemporal parameters were measured using the zebris-FDM-Rehawalk® system, and balance ability was evaluated using the time up and go test (TUG). Satisfaction with the EBOs was determined using the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST2.0) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The EBO showed significant differences in; gait speed, cadence, stride length, stride time, step length unaffected side, stance phase and swing phase on the affected side, and pre-swing on the unaffected side, and balance performance (TUG) (p<0.05) when compared to the AFO and control conditions. The participants were quite satisfied with the EBOs with QUEST2.0 scores greater than 4 out of 5.

CONCLUSIONS

EBOs could be provided to stroke survivors given their acceptability and properties to improve gait and balance. The EBO used in this study offered clinically important improvements in gait and balance when compare to AFO and control conditions, and could mitigate against some of the limitations reported in the use of AFOs in stroke survivors.

Republication of "Uses of Braces and Orthotics for Conservative Management of Foot and Ankle Disorders"

Nonsurgical management is almost always considered the first-line treatment for the vast majority of foot and ankle pathologies. Foot orthoses, shoe modifications, and therapeutic footwear are considered essential tools for successful conservative management of different foot and ankle disorders. Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons should have a meticulous understanding of the lower extremity biomechanics as well as the pathoanatomy and the sequelae of diseases affecting the foot and/or ankle. This is essential to the understanding of the desired effects of the different inserts, orthotics, shoe modifications, or braces that may be prescribed for these conditions. In this article, we will summarize the orthoses used for treatment of the most commonly encountered foot and ankle pathologies, with the exclusion of treatment for the diabetic foot because of the unique requirements of that disease process.

Mobility experiences of adult lower limb orthosis users: a focus group study

PURPOSE

People with lower limb impairments are often prescribed orthoses to preserve or enhance their mobility. Exploration of mobility experiences common among orthosis users may provide insights into how orthoses, and other mobility aids, are utilized and regarded. The objective of this study was to broadly explore how lower limb orthosis users describe their mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four focus groups were held online with participants who lived in the U.S. or Canada. Participants had at least six months of experience using an ankle-foot- and/or a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis for one or both legs. All discussions were transcribed and coded. Thematic analysis was used to identify cross-cutting themes.

RESULTS

Participants included 29 orthosis users with a variety of health conditions. Inter-related themes, including personal factors, situational contexts, and assistance were identified as elements that influenced participants' mobility. Participants described a process of modifying their mobility through the use and non-use of one or more mobility aids.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study findings may assist clinicians in developing strategies to optimize orthosis users' mobility in different situations. Experiences described by participants in this study may also help researchers identify aspects of mobility most pertinent to orthosis users and inform the development of new outcome measures.Implications for RehabilitationPeople who use lower-limb orthoses share common mobility experiences, despite differences in health diagnoses.Orthosis users often have opportunities to modify their mobility by choosing to use or not use their brace(s) and/or handheld mobility aids.When providing mobility aid interventions, clinicians should consider how each patient's individual characteristics, including physical characteristics (e.g., the health condition and how it presents, pain, fatigue) and psychosocial characteristics (e.g., fear and confidence, self-motivation, emotional responses), can affect mobility.Clinicians may be able to help patients optimize their mobility by asking about environmental obstacles they regularly encounter and recommending strategies for utilization of mobility aids, including simultaneous use of multiple aids, use of one aid, or choosing not to use any aids, depending on the activity and situation.Clinicians should inquire about all mobility aids available to a patient at home and in the community, including fixed objects, and consider how new mobility aid interventions might affect the patient's mobility when used alone and in combination with other forms of assistance.

Effect of ankle-foot orthoses on functional outcome measurements in individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the effect of ankle-foot orthosis (AFOs) types on functional outcome measurements in individuals with (sub)acute or chronic stroke impairments.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched from inception until September 2020. Methodological quality assessment of 30 studies was conducted based on the Downs and Black checklist. Functional indices were pooled according to their standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in a random-effect model. A narrative analysis was performed where data pooling was not feasible.

RESULTS

Overall pooled results indicated improvements in favor of AFOs versus without for the Berg Balance Scale (SMD: 0.54, CI: 0.19-0.88), timed-up and go test (SMD: -0.45, CI: -0.67 to -0.24), Functional Ambulatory Categories (SMD: 1.72, CI: 1.25-2.19), 6-Minute Walking Test (SMD: 0.91, CI: 0.53-1.28), Timed Up-Stairs (SMD: -0.35, CI: -0.64 to 0.05), and Motricity Index (SMD: 0.65, CI: 0.38-0.92). Heterogeneity was non-significant for all outcomes (I² < 50%, p > 0.05) except the Berg Balance Scale and Functional Ambulatory Categories. Additionally, there was not sufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of specific orthotic designs over others.

CONCLUSIONS

An AFO can improve ambulatory function in stroke survivors. Future studies should explore the long-term effects of rehabilitation using AFOs and compare differences in orthotic designs.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAn AFO can improve functional performance and ambulation in survivors of strokes.Wearing an AFO in rehabilitation care during the subacute phase post stroke may have beneficial effects on functional outcomes measured.There was no evidence as to the effectiveness of specific AFO designs over others.

Orthotic intervention following stroke: a survey of physiotherapist, occupational therapist and orthotist practice and views in the UK

Background/Aims Orthoses are often used to promote mobility and rehabilitation for patients in the UK after a stroke. The perspective of stroke therapists in the UK is an important factor determining current practice and orthotic provision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of orthotists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists on the delivery mechanisms and relationships that influence orthoses intervention and provision for patients with stroke in the UK.

Methods A UK-based online survey was conducted. Participants were stroke therapy clinicians within acute and community settings, recruited through their membership of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists, the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology, and the Royal Collage of Occupational Therapists—Specialist Section for Neurological Practice. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Results A total of 305 questionnaires were completed (64 orthotists, 131 physiotherapists, 110 occupational therapists). Some 67% (n=190) of respondents identified the optimal timing for initial orthotic assessment as within the first days following a stroke or before discharge from hospital. Waiting times and operational barriers to orthoses provision were perceived to have a negative impact on patients’ rehabilitation. A closer working relationship between orthotists and the stroke rehabilitation team is desirable.

Conclusions The survey found that the use of orthoses and orthotic specialist input are perceived to play an important role within the stroke rehabilitation pathway. Further evaluative research is warranted to explore the optimal timing and benefits, and the orthotist's role within the stroke rehabilitation team.

Anterior or Posterior Ankle Foot Orthoses for Ankle Spasticity: Which One Is Better?

Background and Objectives: Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used by stroke patients to walk safely and efficiently. Both posterior AFOs (PAFOs) and anterior AFOs (AAFOs) are available. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of AAFOs and PAFOs in the treatment of ankle spasticity. Materials and Methods: A crossover design with randomization for the interventions and blinded assessors was used. Twenty patients with chronic stroke, a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of the ankle joint of 2, and a Tardieu angle ≥20 degrees were recruited. The patients were assigned to wear either an AAFO or PAFO at random and subsequently crossover to the other AFO. Results: Twenty stroke patients with ankle spasticity were recruited. The mean age was 46.60 (38−60) years. The mean time since stroke onset was 9.35 (6−15) months. It was discovered that the AAFO improved walking speed as well as the stretch reflex dynamic electromyography (dEMG) and walking dEMG amplitudes of the medial gastrocnemius muscles more significantly than the PAFO (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The AAFO had greater efficacy in reducing both static and dynamic ankle spasticity, and allowed for faster walking than the PAFO. The stretch reflex and walking dEMG amplitudes could be used for quantitative spasticity assessment.

Early Wearing of Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis Improves Functional Prognosis in Patients after Stroke

OBJECTIVES

Knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) is sometimes used for gait training in stroke patients. The impact of the time of wearing KAFO on activities of daily living (ADL) recovery has not been clarified. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the days from onset to KAFO wearing and functional prognosis in patients after stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, observational study was conducted with stroke patients who were prescribed a KAFO. Patients were divided into early and delayed groups according to the median days from onset to KAFO wearing. Baseline characteristics were evaluated at the initiation of KAFO wearing. The primary outcome was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, which was scored by the nurse at baseline and discharge.

RESULTS

112 participants (mean age 67.9 ± 14.0 years, 51.8% male) were included. The time period measure from day of onset to KAFO wearing for the early group was significantly shorter than the delayed group (35.8 ± 6.6 days vs. 73.5 ± 28.9 days). The early group had a higher FIM at discharge (84.9 ± 28.0% vs. 65.1 ± 29.0%, P < 0.001) and higher FIM gain (36.9 ± 19.8% vs. 26.8 ± 22.3, P = 0.013) than did the delayed group. Multiple regression analysis showed that the early group was associated with FIM gain (coefficient = 8.607, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Early wearing of KAFO, irrespective of the difference in ADL at the time of KAFO wearing, may have a positive impact on the improvement of ADL in patients after stroke.

The effect of anterior ankle-foot orthosis and posterior ankle-foot orthosis on functional ambulation in stroke patients

Background

The goal of rehabilitation after stroke is to restore safe and sufficient function to hemiplegic patients, and prescription of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) to improve speed and functional ambulation is a part of this program.

Objective

This crossover randomized interventional study aimed to evaluate the effect of an anterior ankle-foot orthosis (AAFO) and posterior leaf-spring ankle-foot orthosis (PLS AFO) on speed and functional ambulation in hemiplegic stroke patients.

Method

Clinical assessments were performed on 11 hemiplegic stroke patients by the AAFO, PLS AFO, and wearing shoes. Functional ambulation was measured by the 6-min walking test, Timed Up and Go Test, Time Up and Down Stair Test, and Functional Ambulation Category. Walking speed was measured by the 10-m test.

Results

Both PLS AFO and AAFO significantly improved the performance of TUDS and TUG tests in hemiplegic patients. However, by using PLS AFO, walking distance was significantly greater than walking with shoes. There was no significant effect on the walking speed improvement using PLS AFO or AAFO compared to wearing shoes.

Conclusions

The positive effects of the AAFO and PLS AFO on functional ambulation were significant. By using PLS AFO, hemiplegic patients could walk a longer distance than wearing shoes.

The effect of ankle-foot orthosis on ankle kinematics in individuals after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) has a beneficial effect on dorsiflexion angle increase during the swing phase among individuals with stroke and patient-important outcomes in individuals with stroke.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover trials, and cluster RCTs until May 2020 were researched through CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, CINAHL, and REHABDATA databases. Studies reporting on AFO use to improve walking, functional mobility, quality of life, and activity limitations and reports of adverse events in individuals with stroke were included.

METHODOLOGY

Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

SYNTHESIS

Fourteen trials that enrolled 282 individuals with stroke and compared AFO with no AFO were included. Compared with no AFO, AFO could increase the dorsiflexion angle of ankle joints during walking (mean difference [MD, 3.7°]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-5.3; low certainty of evidence). Furthermore, AFO could improve walking ability (walking speed) (MD, 0.09 [m/s]; 95% CI, 0.06-0.12; low certainty of evidence). No study had reported the effects of AFO on quality of life, adverse events, fall frequency, and activities of daily life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that AFO improved ankle kinematics and walking ability in the short term; nonetheless, the evidence was characterized by a low degree of certainty.

Effectiveness of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of ankle–foot orthosis (AFO) use in improving gait biomechanical parameters such as walking speed, mobility, and kinematics in patients with stroke with gait disturbance. We searched the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases and retrieved studies published until June 2021. Experimental and prospective studies were included that evaluated biomechanics or kinematic parameters with or without AFO in patients with stroke. We analyzed gait biomechanical parameters, including walking speed, mobility, balance, and kinematic variables, in studies involving patients with and without AFO use. The criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies, and the level of evidence was evaluated using the Research Pyramid model. Funnel plot analysis and Egger’s test were performed to confirm publication bias. A total of 19 studies including 434 participants that reported on the immediate or short-term effectiveness of AFO use were included in the analysis. Significant improvements in walking speed (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.50; 95% CI 0.34–0.66; P < 0.00001; I², 0%), cadence (SMD, 0.42; 95% CI 0.22–0.62; P < 0.0001; I², 0%), step length (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI 0.18–0.63; P = 0.0003; I², 2%), stride length (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI 0.15–0.71; P = 0.003; I², 7%), Timed up-and-go test (SMD, − 0.30; 95% CI − 0.54 to − 0.07; P = 0.01; I², 0%), functional ambulation category (FAC) score (SMD, 1.61; 95% CI 1.19–2.02; P < 0.00001; I², 0%), ankle sagittal plane angle at initial contact (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI 0.34–0.98; P < 0.0001; I², 0%), and knee sagittal plane angle at toe-off (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI 0.04–0.73; P = 0.03; I², 46%) were observed when the patients wore AFOs. Stride time, body sway, and hip sagittal plane angle at toe-off were not significantly improved (p = 0.74, p = 0.07, p = 0.07, respectively). Among these results, the FAC score showed the most significant improvement, and stride time showed the lowest improvement. AFO improves walking speed, cadence, step length, and stride length, particularly in patients with stroke. AFO is considered beneficial in enhancing gait stability and ambulatory ability.

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses and Functional Electrical Stimulation Post-Stroke

BACKGROUND

Level of ambulation following stroke is a long-term predictor of participation and disability. Decreased lower extremity motor control can impact ambulation and overall mobility. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making for the use of either ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or functional electrical stimulation (FES) as an intervention to improve body function and structure, activity, and participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for individuals with poststroke hemiplegia with decreased lower extremity motor control.

METHODS

A review of literature published through November 2019 was performed across 7 databases for all studies involving stroke and AFO or FES. Data extracted included time post-stroke, participant characteristics, device types, outcomes assessed, and intervention parameters. Outcomes were examined upon initial application and after training. Recommendations were determined on the basis of the strength of the evidence and the potential benefits, harm, risks, or costs of providing AFO or FES.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

One-hundred twenty-two meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies were included. Strong evidence exists that AFO and FES can each increase gait speed, mobility, and dynamic balance. Moderate evidence exists that AFO and FES increase quality of life, walking endurance, and muscle activation, and weak evidence exists for improving gait kinematics. AFO or FES should not be used to decrease plantarflexor spasticity. Studies that directly compare AFO and FES do not indicate overall superiority of one over the other. But evidence suggests that AFO may lead to more compensatory effects while FES may lead to more therapeutic effects. Due to the potential for gains at any phase post-stroke, the most appropriate device for an individual may change, and reassessments should be completed to ensure the device is meeting the individual's needs.

LIMITATIONS

This CPG cannot address the effects of one type of AFO over another for the majority of outcomes, as studies used a variety of AFO types and rarely differentiated effects. The recommendations also do not address the severity of hemiparesis, and most studies included participants with varied baseline ambulation ability.

SUMMARY

This CPG suggests that AFO and FES both lead to improvements post-stroke. Future studies should examine timing of provision, device types, intervention duration and delivery, longer term follow-up, responders versus nonresponders, and individuals with greater impairments.

DISCLAIMER

These recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for people with poststroke hemiplegia who have decreased lower extremity motor control that impacts ambulation and overall mobility.A Video Abstract is available as supplemental digital content from the authors (available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A335).

Clinical outcome measures to evaluate the effects of orthotic management post-stroke: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To identify, and classify, according to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), clinically applicable outcome measures that have been used to evaluate lower limb orthotic management post-stroke and to investigate which outcome measures recorded the largest effect sizes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Cinahl, Scopus and Embase databases from inception to May 2020. Articles were included if they investigated clinical outcomes in people post-stroke who had received a lower-limb orthotic intervention.

RESULTS

88 articles underwent full-text review and 54 were included in the review, which was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) principles. 48 different outcome measures were identified; effect sizes were able to be calculated from 39 studies. The most frequently applied outcome measures were the 10-metre Walk Test and the timed-up-and-go test. Outcome measures that recorded large effect sizes in two or more studies were the 10-metre Walk Test, Functional Reach Test, and Physiological Cost Index. When coded according to the ICF, the most frequently represented codes were d450 (Walking) and d455 (moving around).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that outcome measures related to mobility (ICF chapter d4) are most often applied to evaluate orthotic management post-stroke. Effect sizes appear to be greatest in outcome measures related to velocity, balance, and energy expenditure.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe 10-meter Walk Test appears to have the greatest effect size when evaluating orthotic management post-stroke.While outcome measures related to mobility are commonly applied when evaluating orthotic management post-stroke, rehabilitation professionals should consider complementing these with measures representing the participation domain of the ICF.

Ankle-foot orthoses improve walking but do not reduce dual-task costs after stroke

BACKGROUND

Cognitive-motor interference, as measured by dual-task walking (performing a mental task while walking), affects many clinical populations. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are lower-leg splints prescribed to provide stability to the foot and ankle, as well as prevent foot drop, a gait deficit common after stroke. AFO use has been shown to improve gait parameters such as speed and step time, which are often negatively impacted by dual-task walking.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to establish whether AFOs could protect against cognitive-motor interference, as measured by dual-task walking, following post-stroke hemiplegia.

METHODS

A total of 21 individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia that use an AFO completed a dual-task walking paradigm in the form of a 2 (walking with vs. without a concurrent cognitive task) by 2 (walking with vs. without an AFO) repeated-measures design. Changes to both motor and cognitive performance were analyzed.

RESULTS

The results suggest that the use of an AFO improves gait overall in both single- and dual-task walking, particularly with respect to stride regularity, but there were no interactions to suggest that AFOs reduce the cognitive-motor dual-task costs themselves. A lack of differences in cognitive performance during dual-task walking with and without the AFO suggests that the AFO's benefit to motor performance cannot be attributed to task prioritization.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of AFOs to improve certain gait parameters for post-stroke hemiplegia, but AFOs do not appear to protect against cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking. Future research should pursue alternate therapeutics for ameliorating task-specific declines under cognitively demanding circumstances.

Identifying Instruments to Assess Care Quality for Individuals With Custom Ankle Foot Orthoses: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

We conducted 2 complementary scoping reviews to identify instruments that assess the experience and outcomes of custom ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) care in individuals with neurologic and traumatic conditions and to determine to what extent they might be psychometrically sound for AFO users. A stakeholder advisory committee considered to what extent the identified and psychometrically sound instruments might be feasible for use in developing quality measures for custom AFO users.

DATA SOURCES

Both scoping reviews were conducted using PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. The following were used for the first scoping review only: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database.

STUDY SELECTION

The initial scoping review yielded 79 articles with 82 instruments, 16 of which were used in 4 or more studies. The second scoping review yielded 57 articles reporting psychometric properties.

DATA EXTRACTION

Psychometric properties for populations who use AFOs were summarized for 15 of the 16 instruments. The advisory committee eliminated 2 insrtruments, noted overlap between 4 instruments in terms of the constructs measured, and suggested 6 potential contemporary substitutes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Most instruments assessed activity (specifically mobility) and pertained to the National Quality Forum domain of "Health-Related Quality of Life." The 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, and Rivermead Mobility Index were reported to have adequate reliability and validity, and were considered feasible for administration in a clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Complementary scoping reviews demonstrated that some instruments with reasonable psychometric properties are available that are feasible to use in developing quality measures for custom AFO care. However, experience of care instruments suitable for this population were not identified but are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of care quality for AFO users.

Data-Driven Optimal Assistance Control of a Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Hemiplegic Patients

More recently, lower limb exoskeletons (LLE) have gained considerable interests in strength augmentation, rehabilitation, and walking assistance scenarios. For walking assistance, the LLE is expected to control the affected leg to track the unaffected leg's motion naturally. A critical issue in this scenario is that the exoskeleton system needs to deal with unpredictable disturbance from the patient, and the controller has the ability to adapt to different wearers. To this end, a novel data-driven optimal control (DDOC) strategy is proposed to adapt different hemiplegic patients with unpredictable disturbances. The interaction relation between two lower limbs of LLE and the leg of patient's unaffected side are modeled in the context of leader-follower framework. Then, the walking assistance control problem is transformed into an optimal control problem. A policy iteration (PI) algorithm is utilized to obtain the optimal controller. To improve the online adaptation to different patients, an actor-critic neural network (AC/NN) structure of the reinforcement learning (RL) is employed to learn the optimal controller on the basis of PI algorithm. Finally, experiments both on a simulation environment and a real LLE system are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed walking assistance control method.

The effect of tuning ankle foot orthoses-footwear combinations on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy: A case series

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

BACKGROUND

AFOs are a commonly prescribed medical device given to children with cerebral palsy (CP) in an attempt to improve their gait. The current literature is equivocal on the effects AFOs have on the gait of children with CP. The vast majority of AFOs issued are not subject to AFO-FC tuning. There are emerging studies investigating the effects tuning AFO-FCs has on the gait of children with CP. However, the research is limited, and there is a lack of quantitative data.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the kinematics of tuned versus non-tuned gait in children with CP.

METHODS

Gait analysis assessment of five children aged between 7-11 years with a diagnosis of CP (one hemiplegic and four diplegic participants, two female, three male, with a Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) of 2) at a Gait Analysis Laboratory.

RESULTS

In comparison to barefoot and non-tuned gait, walking with a tuned AFO-FC produced improvements in several key gait parameters. Including hip flexion and extension, posterior pelvic tilt and knee extension. Results also indicated that the type of gait pattern demonstrated by the participant affected the outcomes of tuning.

CONCLUSIONS

Tuning the AFO-FC of children with CP has the potential to improve hip function, pelvic function, knee extension in stance phase and knee flexion during swing phase and that a non-tuned AFO-FC can potentially decrease hip function, posterior pelvic tilt and increase knee extension.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Whilst AFO-FC tuning has been recommended for routine clinical practice, there still remains a paucity of research on the kinematic effects of using a tuned AFO-FC compared to a non-tuned. This paper provides a comparison of kinematics on children with CP, during barefoot, non-tuned and tuned AFO-FC walking with a view to inform clinical practice.

Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on level walking in healthy subjects

An ankle-foot orthosis is often prescribed in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological motor disorders such as hemiparesis. However, walking with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis may not be effectively achieved just by trying to reproduce normal intact walking with a symmetrical gait pattern. Understanding skills to facilitate walking gait with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis has implications for better rehabilitative interventions to help restore walking ability in patients with stroke. We, therefore, analyzed the kinematics and ground reaction forces of walking with and without an ankle-foot orthosis in healthy subjects to infer the possible skills to facilitate walking gait with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis. Adult male participants were asked to walk with and without an ankle-foot orthosis across two force platforms set in a wooden walkway, and body kinematics and ground reaction force profiles in the sagittal plane were simultaneously recorded. We found that the forward tilting angle of the trunk at the time of toe-off of the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis was significantly larger than that of the leg without the ankle-foot orthosis, to adaptively compensate for the loss of ankle joint mobility due to the unilateral ankle-foot orthosis. Furthermore, the peak vertical ground reaction force at heel-contact was significantly larger in the leg without the ankle-foot orthosis than in the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis owing to the fact that the stance phase duration of the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis was relatively shorter. Such information may potentially be applied to facilitate walking training in stroke patients wearing a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis.

Identification of Spring Coefficient for Heel Rocker Function Support Based on Estimated Dorsiflexion Torque

In previous research, we have developed a high-dorsiflexion assistive robotic technology aiming for gait rehabilitation targeting on ankle dorsiflexion movement. A McKibben-type artificial muscle is applied to provide large dorsiflexion force while adding little weight to the device. This ensures the foot clearance before initial stance phase in gait. Meanwhile, a tension spring is deployed in series with the artificial muscle to support heel rocker function in loading response phase. Suitable spring coefficient for each individual differs according to ankle's dorsiflexion torque in loading response. An unsuitable spring would lead to knee deviation in this phase. In this study, we derived an identification equation to determine a suitable spring coefficient for individuals based on estimation of dorsiflexion torque required to support. An evaluation test on healthy objects was conducted, which shows no negative effects on participants' knee angles with the identified spring coefficient.

Immediate effect of a wearable foot drop stimulator to prevent foot drop on the gait ability of patients with hemiplegia after stroke

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a foot drop stimulator (FDS) and ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) on the gait ability of patients with hemiplegia after stroke. This study recruited 10 patients with hemiplegia after stroke. All patients performed gait under two conditions (AFO and FDS gait). Gait parameters were measured with the GAITRite® system to analyze the spatial and temporal parameters of the patients' gaits. No significant differences in cadence, velocity, swing time, stance time, or step length of the affected or less-affected limbs were found between the two conditions (all, p > .05). These findings demonstrate that AFO and FDS have a similar effect on the gait ability of patients with hemiplegia after stroke.

Efficacy of different techniques of AFO construction for hemiplegia patients: A systematic review

Background: Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are frequently prescribed to improve gait deviation and normalize walking pattern in patients with drop foot hemiplegia disorder. This study was to review the efficacy of different techniques of AFO construction and biomechanics parameters of AFOs. Furthermore, this study aimed to provide a guideline for researchers in detail and help them choose a sufficient measurement instrument.

Methods: Information sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, and the Full Cochrane Library up to December 25, 2015. The inclusion criteria include: (1) type and method of controlled clinical trial studies; (2) age of hemiplegia groups (3); AFOs as an intervention; and (4) kinetic and kinematic parameters, and energy expenditure as an intervention of gait performance.

Results: Considering eligibility criteria such as study design, setting, time frame and Language 9 papers with Pedro scores of 5 to 8 for methodological quality were included in the review.

Conclusion: The findings of this review can help to develop guidelines for the best AFO reporting as an intervention and to prevent vagueness of results in the different types of AFOs.

Orthotists' and physical therapists' perspectives on quality of care indicators for persons with custom ankle-foot orthoses

Purpose: To describe the priorities of orthotists and physical therapists about quality measurement themes, and the feasibility and utility of collecting data from persons using custom AFOs that could inform quality measure development.Materials and Methods: Online survey assessed respondents' perspectives and experiences. An Advisory Committee representing professional, organizational, and accreditor groups distributed survey invitations.Results: 461 orthotists and 153 physical therapists completed part or all of the survey; 60% rated 9 quality themes and 20 quality of care topics as extremely important, and 12 standard instruments as feasible and good to use for quality measurement. Patients were the preferred source of information for ease of scheduling, device weight, ease of donning and doffing, adherence to device use, beneficial effects, activity level and independence, and quality of life. Clinicians were the preferred source for material quality, device modifiability, and joint range of motion. Facility records were the preferred source for timeliness of device delivery and clinician follow-up. Respondents reported that gait speed and walking endurance were best obtained by patient performance.Conclusions: Results provide insight on the topics orthotists and physical therapists regard as priorities for defining healthcare quality for persons using custom ankle-foot orthoses and instruments for data collection.

Study on the design development of a multi joint ankle foot orthosis

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a newly designed multi joint ankle-foot orthosis on the gait and dynamic balance of stroke patients having foot drop. [Participants and Methods] This study was investigated 10 participants who were diagnosed with stroke. Patients were evaluated based on a 10-meter walk test, timed up and go test and Berg balance scale after each participant wore a plastic ankle-foot orthosis and a multi joint ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) that consisted of orthosis joints (having poster-stop joint and Klenzak joint functions). [Results] The 10-meter walk test, timed up and go test and Berg balance scale showed significant differences in the orthosis with the Klenzak joint function. [Conclusion] The appropriate use of Klenzak AFO of the newly designed multi joint AFO is expected to have a positive effect on improving the gait and balancing ability of stroke patients having foot drop.

Uses of Braces and Orthotics for Conservative Management of Foot and Ankle Disorders

Nonsurgical management is almost always considered the first-line treatment for the vast majority of foot and ankle pathologies. Foot orthoses, shoe modifications, and therapeutic footwear are considered essential tools for successful conservative management of different foot and ankle disorders. Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons should have a meticulous understanding of the lower extremity biomechanics as well as the pathoanatomy and the sequelae of diseases affecting the foot and/or ankle. This is essential to the understanding of the desired effects of the different inserts, orthotics, shoe modifications, or braces that may be prescribed for these conditions. In this article, we will summarize the orthoses used for treatment of the most commonly encountered foot and ankle pathologies, with the exclusion of treatment for the diabetic foot because of the unique requirements of that disease process.

Immediate effects of talus-stabilizing taping on balance and gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Talus-stabilizing taping (TST) may improve ankle range of motion and gait performance by providing a posterior-inferior talar glide in a closed-chain dorsiflexion position.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of TST on balance and gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke.

METHODS

Twenty post-stroke patients participated in this study. Each participant performed tests under three conditions (TST, barefoot, and conventional ankle-foot orthosis [AFO]), in random order. Before testing, the patients walked for 10 min under the three conditions, followed by a 5 min rest period. The outcome measures were static balance ability (SBA), timed up-and-go (TUG) test results, and gait parameters evaluated using a 6-m-long gait mat. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine the difference in balance and gait parameters under the three conditions.

RESULTS

SBA more significantly improved in the TST condition than in the barefoot condition. SBA more significantly improved in the conventional AFO condition than in the barefoot condition. The TUG test results more significantly improved in the TST condition than in the conventional AFO and barefoot conditions. Walking speed, cadence, and affected side and unaffected side step and stride lengths more significantly improved in the TST condition than in the conventional AFO and barefoot conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study used a cross-sectional method and demonstrated that TST improves SBA, TUG, gait speed, cadence, step length, and stride length in patients with chronic stroke.

Bespoke versus off-the-shelf ankle-foot orthosis for people with stroke: randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of two designs of ankle-foot orthosis on people with stroke.

DESIGN

The study design was an assessor-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The setting was community stroke services.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 139 community-dwelling stroke survivors with limited mobility were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

The two most commonly used types of ankle-foot orthosis (bespoke and off-the-shelf) were chosen.

MAIN MEASURES

The main measures of the study were as follows: short- (6 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks) effects on stroke survivors' satisfaction; adverse events; mobility (Walking Handicap Scale); fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)) and walking impairments (gait speed and step length using the 5-m walk test).

RESULTS

Long-term satisfaction was non-significantly higher in the off-the-shelf group: 72% versus 64%; OR (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.31 to 1.3); P = 0.21. No statistically significant differences were found between the orthoses except that the off-the-shelf group had less fear of falling at short-term follow-up than the bespoke group: mean difference (95% CI) = -4.6 (-7.6 to -1.6) points on the FES-I; P = 0.003.

CONCLUSION

No differences between off-the-shelf and bespoke ankle-foot orthoses were found except that participants in the off-the-shelf orthosis group had less fear of falling at short-term follow-up.

Wearable tubing assistive walking device immediately enhances gait parameters in subjects with stroke: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients develop compensatory movements due to limitations of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion. To solve the limitations, there are many adjustable walking assistive devices such as robotic devices, ankle-foot orthoses, and functional electric stimulation in rehabilitation session. However, these assistive devices have some disadvantages, including expense and discomforts. Therefore, the development of a new assistive device for stroke patients is needed to assist ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of a wearable tubing assistive walking device (WTAWD) on gait parameters (gait speed, cadence, and step length and stride length on affected and less affected sides) in patients with stroke.

METHODS

Gait parameters were measured using the GAITRite system. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine gait differences under three conditions (WTAWD, barefoot, and conventional elastic band orthosis).

RESULTS

Gait speed, cadence, and step length and stride length on both affected and less affected sides were significantly greater with WTAWD, compared to barefoot and conventional elastic band orthosis conditions.

CONCLUSION

WTAWD could be effective for patients with stroke.

The effect of different shoes on functional mobility and energy expenditure in post-stroke hemiplegic patients using ankle-foot orthosis

BACKGROUND

Ankle-foot orthoses could be utilized both with and without shoes. While several studies have shown that ankle-foot orthoses improve gait abilities in hemiplegic patients, it remains unclear whether they should be used with shoes or without.

OBJECTIVES

The study purpose was to compare the effect of standard shoes and rocker shoes on functional mobility in post-stroke hemiplegic patients utilizing ankle-foot orthosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical study.

METHODS

Thirty post-stroke hemiplegic patients participated in this study randomly assigned to two groups. Group I received standard shoes + ankle-foot orthosis and group II were provided with rocker shoes + ankle-foot orthosis. Their functional mobility and energy expenditure parameters including timed up and go, timed up stairs, timed down stairs, preferred walking speed, and oxygen (O2) cost (mL/kg/m) were measured.

RESULTS

In group I, no significant changes were seen in outcome measures after wearing standard shoes. While in group II, O2 cost and timed up and go time significantly decreased, and preferred walking speed increased when patients wore rocker shoes. Also, there was a significant difference between rocker shoes and standard shoes in improvement of timed up and go, preferred walking speed, and O2 cost.

CONCLUSION

When patients using ankle-foot orthosis wore rocker shoes, their functional mobility improved and oxygen cost diminished. Also, rocker shoes was significantly more effective than standard shoes in improving functional mobility parameters.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that in post-stroke hemiplegic patients using ankle-foot orthosis, wearing rocker shoes can lead to much more improved functional mobility and decreased energy expenditure compared to ankle-foot orthosis only. Thus, in stroke patients, the combination of ankle-foot orthosis-rocker shoes is recommended for both rehabilitation programs and ankle-foot orthosis efficacy investigations.

The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients.

Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions.

Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test.

Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85–8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4 4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1 –14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO.

Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO.

Immediate effects of an individually designed functional ankle-foot orthosis on stance and gait in hemiparetic patients

Objective: To evaluate the immediate effects of individually designed functional in-shoe ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) made of soft and hard cast on balance, standing, and gait parameters in hemiparetic patients.

Design: Crossover design with randomized order of the intervention.

Setting: A rehabilitation centre for adults with neurological disorders.

Subjects: Twenty-eight patients with hemiparesis due to stroke or traumatic brain injury.

Measures: Postural sway, standing and gait parameters based on ground reaction forces in two conditions: Patients were randomly assigned to varying sequences of wearing AFO in footwear or wearing footwear alone.

Results: AFO significantly improved weight-bearing on the affected leg (affected/ unaffected side symmetry: 2.259 ± 1.5 with AFO versus 3.49 ± 2.5 without AFO, P B ± 0.05) and postural sway in stance (12.5 mm9 ± 5.2 with AFO versus 15.7 mm9 ± 6.7 without AFO, P < ± 0.05), double stance duration (21.19 ± 14.4% of gait cycle with AFO versus 25.99 ± 21.6% of gait cycle without AFO, P < ± 0.05), and symmetry ratios of gait parameters such as stance duration (2.09 ± 1.5 s with AFO versus 3.39 ± 3.6 s without AFO, P < ± 0.05) and deceleration forces (1.69 ± 0.5 with AFO versus 1.99 ± 0.6 without AFO, P < ± 0.05) during gait. No significant differences were observed in all other symmetry ratios of gait parameters.

Conclusion: An individually designed functional in-shoe AFO can improve stance and gait parameters, even in a single use, in patients with hemiparesis.

The influence of an ankle-foot orthosis on the spatiotemporal gait parameters and functional balance in chronic stroke patients

[Purpose] Observational study investigating the influence of various ankle-foot orthoses on the spatiotemporal gait parameters and functional balance in chronic stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen chronic stroke patients participated in this study after providing informed consent. Two groups of patients were differentiated based on the Timed Up and Go Test. Patients were tested in three different conditions: with standard prefabricated ankle-foot orthosis (Maramed), with individualized ankle-foot orthosis (Y-tech), and without any ankle-foot orthrosis. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were obtained by walking on an instrumented walkway (GAITRite(®)) at usual and fastest speed. Balance was assessed with Timed Up and Go Test, Step Test, and Four Square Step Test. [Results] Maramed and Y-tech significantly improved the spatiotemporal parameters while walking at usual and maximal speed (single support time affected side; double support time affected side and step length unaffected side). The Y-tech in addition improved velocity and cadence. Among the balance tests, only the Timed Up and Go test showed improvements in favor of Maramed and Y-tech. [Conclusion] Patients benefited from wearing orthosis at both usual and maximal speed, irrespective of whether they wore Maramed or Y-tech. Only severe stroke patients benefited from wearing an orthoses compared to mild impaired group.

A systematic review of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction with limb orthoses

BACKGROUND

Assessment of patient satisfaction with orthosis is a key point for clinical practice and research, requiring questionnaires with robust psychometric properties.

OBJECTIVES

To identify which validated questionnaires are used to investigate patient satisfaction with orthosis in limb orthotics and to analyse (1) their main fields of clinical application, (2) the orthosis-related features analysed by the questionnaires and (3) the strength of their psychometric properties.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Scopus databases for original articles published within the last 20 years was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 papers pertaining to various clinical fields were selected. The main features of patient satisfaction with orthosis analysed were as follows: aesthetic, ease in donning and doffing the device, time of orthotic use and comfort.

CONCLUSION

Of the questionnaires used to investigate patient satisfaction with orthosis, only four are adequately validated for this purpose: two for generic orthotic use (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology 2.0 and Client Satisfaction with Device of Orthotics and Prosthetic Users' Survey) and two for specific application with orthopaedic shoes (Questionnaire for the Usability Evaluation of orthopaedic shoes and Monitor Orthopaedic Shoes). Further development, refinement and validation of outcome measures in this field are warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given the importance of analysing patient satisfaction with orthosis (PSwO), appropriate instruments to assess outcome are needed. This article reviews the currently available instruments and reflects on how future studies could be focused on the development, refinement and validation of outcome measures in this field.

Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on mediolateral foot-placement ability during post-stroke gait

BACKGROUND

Accurate and precise mediolateral foot placement is important for balance during gait, but is impaired post stroke. Mediolateral foot placement may be improved with ankle-foot orthosis use.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an ankle-foot orthosis improves mediolateral foot-placement ability during post-stroke ambulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Crossover trial with randomized order of conditions tested.

METHODS

The accuracy and precision of mediolateral foot placement was quantified while subjects targeted four different randomized step widths. Subjects were tested with and without their regular non-rigid ankle-foot orthosis in two separate visits (order randomized).

RESULTS

While ankle-foot orthosis use corrected foot and ankle alignment (i.e. significantly decreased mid-swing plantar flexion, p = 0.000), effects of ankle-foot orthosis use on hip hiking (p = 0.545), circumduction (p = 0.179), coronal plane hip range of motion (p = 0.06), and mediolateral foot-placement ability (p = 0.537) were not significant.

CONCLUSION

While ankle-foot orthosis-mediated equinovarus correction of the affected foot and ankle was not associated with improved biomechanics of walking (i.e. proximal ipsilateral hip kinematics or mediolateral foot-placement ability), it may affect other aspects of balance that were not tested in this study (e.g. proprioception, cerebellar, vestibular, and cognitive mechanisms).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Studies that investigate the effect of ankle-foot orthosis on gait can help advance stroke rehabilitation by documenting the specific gait benefits of ankle-foot orthosis use. In this study, we investigated the effect of ankle-foot orthosis use on mediolateral foot-placement ability, an aspect of gait important for maintaining balance.

Changes in angular kinematics of the paretic lower limb at different orthotic angles of plantar flexion limitation of an ankle-foot-orthosis for stroke patients

[Purpose] An ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) is an assistive brace that allows stroke patients to achieve an independent gait. Therefore, we examined whether or not the orthotic angle for plantar flexion limitation affects the kinematic parameters of the hip and knee joints on the affected side of patients with stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen patients with chronic hemiplegia were recruited for this study. Kinematic three-dimensional data was acquired, while patients walked along a walkway wearing AFOs under five different conditions of 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of plantar stop limitation angle in the orthotic joint. Peak angles of the hip and knee joints on the affected side were analyzed. [Results] At the peak angle of the knee joint, statistically significant differences were found only at mid-stance in the sagittal plane and the horizontal plane. However, no significant differences were observed among any of the orthotic limitation angles in the frontal plane. [Conclusion] According to the results, an orthotic limitation angle of more than 10° elicits changes in the knee joint angle at mid-stance in the sagittal and horizontal planes. This study provided basic data on postural changes of patients with stroke.

Immediate effects of unilateral restricted ankle motion on gait kinematics in healthy subjects

Correcting a pathological toe walking gait pattern can be achieved by restricting excessive plantarflexion during the swing phase of gait. A common conservative treatment measure is providing the patient with an ankle-foot-orthosis on the affected lower leg. This study examined the lower body gait kinematics and temporal-spatial parameters of fifteen healthy adults when walking freely and with unilateral restricted ankle motion. The latter was achieved by fitting an ankle-foot-orthosis. Specific hip and knee kinematic parameters and temporal-spatial parameters were investigated. Differences between the two conditions were calculated by paired Student's t-tests and 95% confidence intervals. Unilateral restricted ankle motion influenced kinematics mainly in the swing phase. Hip and knee peak flexion in the swing phase were increased on the restricted side (hip: 49.2° (SD 4.2°), knee: 75.9° (SD 6.1°)) compared to walking freely (hip: 43.3° (SD 4.5°), knee: 66.7° (SD 5.3°)). Peak hip flexion occurred earlier in the swing phase in the restricted condition (85% (SD 2%)) compared to the free-walking condition (96% (SD 5%)). For these parameters, the confidence intervals were different, indicating clinical relevance. Walking with unilateral restricted ankle motion had a negative effect on walking velocity, cadence, step time, and step length. The confidence intervals, however, overlapped. These results might be a reaction to unusual sensory feedback from the feet with the ankle-foot-orthosis or due to increased hip flexor activity compensating for the reduced function of the plantarflexors. The evaluation of the immediate changes in unilateral restricted ankle motion in individuals with healthy gaits can contribute to a more complete understanding on this topic.

Immediate effects of an elastic arm sling on walking patterns of chronic stroke patients

[Purpose] We developed a new arm sling with an elastic bandage which we hearafter refer to as "the elastic arm sling". This study investigated the immediate effects of the elastic arm sling on the gait patterns of stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Thirteen stroke patients were enrolled in this study after providing their informed consent. They walked on a GAITRite mat twice, with a 5-min rest between the trials. [Results] Significant improvements were seen in cadence and walking velocity during walking while wearing the elastic arm sling. Furthermore, patients who used the elastic arm sling showed significant increases in step lengths of the affected and unaffected limbs. The stride lengths of the affected and unaffected sides while wearing the elastic arm sling and those without the elastic arm sling also significantly differed. [Conclusion] These results demonstrate that the elastic arm sling is a useful tool for the gait training of stroke patients, especially cadence, walking velocity, and the step and stride lengths of both limbs. Therefore, therapists should use the elastic arm sling as a gait-training assistive device for stroke patients.

The effect of ankle-foot orthosis plantarflexion stiffness on ankle and knee joint kinematics and kinetics during first and second rockers of gait in individuals with stroke

BACKGROUND

Stiffness of an ankle-foot orthosis plays an important role in improving gait in patients with a history of stroke. To address this, the aim of this case series study was to determine the effect of increasing plantarflexion stiffness of an ankle-foot orthosis on the sagittal ankle and knee joint angle and moment during the first and second rockers of gait.

METHODS

Gait data were collected in 5 subjects with stroke at a self-selected walking speed under two plantarflexion stiffness conditions (0.4Nm/° and 1.3Nm/°) using a stiffness-adjustable experimental ankle-foot orthosis on a Bertec split-belt fully instrumented treadmill in a 3-dimensional motion analysis laboratory.

FINDINGS

By increasing the plantarflexion stiffness of the ankle-foot orthosis, peak plantarflexion angle of the ankle was reduced and peak dorsiflexion moment was generally increased in the first rocker as hypothesized. Two subjects demonstrated increases in both peak knee flexion angle and peak knee extension moment in the second rocker as hypothesized. The two subjects exhibited minimum contractility during active plantarflexion, while the other three subjects could actively plantarflex their ankle joint.

INTERPRETATION

It was suggested that those with the decreased ability to actively plantarflex their ankle could not overcome excessive plantarflexion stiffness at initial contact of gait, and as a result exhibited compensation strategies at the knee joint. Providing excessively stiff ankle-foot orthoses might put added stress on the extensor muscles of the knee joint, potentially creating fatigue and future pathologies in some patients with stroke.

User satisfaction with orthotic devices and service in taiwan

User satisfaction is afforded considerable importance as an outcome measurement in evidence-based healthcare and the client-centered approach. Several studies have investigated user satisfaction with orthoses. Few studies have investigated user satisfaction with orthoses in Taiwan. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the user satisfaction with orthotic devices and service using the Taiwanese version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 280 subjects who had used orthoses and received services. The results showed that the mean satisfaction score was 3.74 for the devices and 3.56 for service. Concerning the participants, 69.1% and 59.6% were quite satisfied or very satisfied with their devices and service, respectively. The satisfaction score of orthotic service was lower than that of the devices. Regarding demographic characteristics, participants living in different areas differed only in service score (p = 0.002). The participants living in eastern area and offshore islands were the least satisfied with the orthotic service. For clinical characteristics, there was a significant difference in satisfaction scores among severity of disability (all p = 0.015), types of orthoses (all p = 0.001), and duration of usage (all p = 0.001). The participants with mild disability, wearing the pressure garment and using the orthosis for less than one year, were the most satisfied with their orthotic devices and service. There is a need for improved orthotic devices and services, especially with respect to the comfort of the devices and the provision of subsidy funding.

A sock for foot-drop: a preliminary study on two chronic stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Foot-drop is a common motor impairment of chronic stroke patients, which may be addressed with an ankle foot orthosis. Although there is reasonable evidence of effectiveness for ankle foot orthoses, user compliance is sometimes poor. This study investigated a new alternative to the ankle foot orthosis, the dorsiflex sock.

CASE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS

The dorsiflex sock was evaluated using an A-B single case experimental design. Two community-dwelling, chronic stroke patients with foot-drop participated in this study. Measures were selected to span the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health domains and user views on the dorsiflex sock were also collected.

FINDINGS AND OUTCOMES

The dorsiflex sock was not effective in improving participants' walking symmetry, speed or energy expenditure. Participant 1 showed improvement in the distance he could walk in 6 min when using the dorsiflex sock, but this was in keeping with a general improvement trend over the course of this study. However, both participants viewed the dorsiflex sock positively and reported a positive effect on their walking.

CONCLUSION

Despite positive user perceptions, the study found no clear evidence that dorsiflex sock is effective in improving foot-drop.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although the dorsiflex sock offers an attractive alternative to an ankle foot orthosis, the case studies found no clear evidence of its efficacy. Clinicians should view this device with caution until further research becomes available.

The effects of two different ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with acute hemiparetic cerebrovascular accident

Objective. To compare the effects of two types of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and to evaluate their preference in using each AFO type. Design. Thirty individuals with acute hemiparetic CVA were tested without an AFO, with an off-the-shelf carbon AFO (C-AFO), and with a custom plastic AFO (P-AFO) in random order at the time of initial orthotic fitting. Gait velocity, cadence, stride length, and step length were collected using an electronic walkway and the subjects were surveyed about their perceptions of each device. Results. Subjects walked significantly faster, with a higher cadence, longer stride, and step lengths, when using either the P-AFO or the C-AFO as compared to no AFO (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between gait parameters of the two AFOs. However, the subjects demonstrated a statistically significant preference of using P-AFO in relation to their balance, confidence, and sense of safety during ambulation (P < 0.05). Moreover, if they had a choice, 50.87 ± 14.7% of the participants preferred the P-AFO and 23.56 ± 9.70% preferred the C-AFO. Conclusions. AFO use significantly improved gait in patients with acute CVA. The majority of users preferred the P-AFO over the Cf-AFO especially when asked about balance and sense of safety.