Coeliac plexus block using computed tomography guidance

MRI-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain: Efficacy and safety

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine the efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) for pancreatic cancer pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 39 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent 0.23T MRI-guided CPN with ethanol via the posterior approach. The pain relief, the opioid intake, and pain interference with appetite, sleep, and communication in patients were assessed after CPN during a 4-month follow-up period. The complications were also evaluated during or after CPN.

RESULTS

CPN procedures were successfully completed for all patients. Minor complications included diarrhea (9 of 39; 23.1%), orthostatic hypotension (14 of 39; 35.9%), and local backache (20 of 39; 51.3%). No major complication occurred. Pain relief was observed in 36 (92.3%), in 15 (40.5%), and in 11 (35.5%) patients at 1-, 2-, and 3-month visits, respectively. The median duration of pain relief was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-3.4). The opioid intake significantly decreased at the 1-, 2-, and 3-month visits (P < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.001 respectively), and there was significant improvement in sleep at the 1-, 2-, and 3-month visits (P < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.001 respectively), and appetite and communication were significantly improved at the 1- and 2-month visits (all P < 0.001); all compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

MRI-guided CPN appears to be an effective and minimally invasive procedure for palliative pain management of pancreatic cancer. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;44:923-928.

Palliative interventions for pain in cancer patients

Pain is a debilitating problem that is common to most patients with cancer at some time during the course of their disease. Conventional therapies such as opiate analgesics and radiation therapy provide suboptimal and limited relief. Novel image-guided interventions have made a significant impact in the management of this difficult problem. This article reviews some of the most promising image-guided techniques for relieving bone and visceral pain in patients suffering from cancer.

Cancer pain: part 2: physical, interventional and complimentary therapies; management in the community; acute, treatment-related and complex cancer pain: a perspective from the British Pain Society endorsed by the UK Association of Palliative Medicine and the Royal College of General Practitioners

OBJECTIVE

This discussion document about the management of cancer pain is written from the pain specialists' perspective in order to provoke thought and interest in a multimodal approach to the management of cancer pain, not just towards the end of life, but pain at diagnosis, as a consequence of cancer therapies, and in cancer survivors. It relates the science of pain to the clinical setting and explains the role of psychological, physical, interventional and complementary therapies in cancer pain.

METHODS

This document has been produced by a consensus group of relevant healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom and patients' representatives making reference to the current body of evidence relating to cancer pain. In the second of two parts, physical, invasive and complementary cancer pain therapies; treatment in the community; acute, treatment-related and complex cancer pain are considered.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recognized that the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder, whilst providing relief of cancer pain towards the end of life for many sufferers world-wide, may have limitations in the context of longer survival and increasing disease complexity. To complement this, it is suggested that a more comprehensive model of managing cancer pain is needed that is mechanism-based and multimodal, using combination therapies including interventions where appropriate, tailored to the needs of an individual, with the aim to optimize pain relief with minimization of adverse effects.

Use of epidural steroid as an adjuvant in neuropathic cancer pain management: a case report

The complexity of pain and pain care is such that there may come a point in the treatment of a patient with pain when a simple approach to management is no longer possible. The proverbial analgesic ladder can be rapidly overtaken when attempting palliative management of long-term or severe end-of-life pain. Epidural steroid injection is frequently used procedure in chronic back pain of neuropathic origin in nonmalignant cases. This case report implicates the use of epidural steroid for the management of severe neuropathic symptoms including allodynia and hyperalgesia in the setting of cancer pain and palliative care.

Thermoablation of Liver Metastases: Efficacy of Temporary Celiac Plexus Block

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of celiac plexus block during thermoablation of liver metastases.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients underwent thermoablation therapy of liver tumors by laser-induced thermotherapy. Twenty-nine patients received a temporary celiac plexus block, 26 patients acted as control group. In both groups fentanyl and midazolam were administered intravenously upon request of the patient. The duration of the intervention, consumption of opiates, and individual pain sensations were documented.

RESULTS

No complications resulting from the celiac plexus block were recorded. Celiac plexus block significantly reduced the amount of pain medication used during thermoablation therapy of liver tumors (with block, 2.45 mug fentanyl per kg body weight; without block, 3.58 mug fentanyl per kg body weight, p < 0.05; midazolam consumption was not reduced) in patients with metastases < or = 5 mm from the liver capsule. For metastases farther away from the capsule no significant differences in opiate consumption were seen. Celiac plexus block reduced the time for thermoablation significantly (178 min versus 147 min, p < 0.05) no matter how far the metastases were from the liver capsule. Average time needed to set the block was 12 min (range 9-15 min); additional costs for the block were marginal. As expected (as pain medications were given according to individual patients' needs) pain indices did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with liver metastases < or = 5 mm from the liver capsule, celiac plexus block reduces the amount of opiates necessary, simplifying patient monitoring. In addition celiac plexus block reduces intervention time, with positive effects on overall workflow for all patients.

Coeliac plexus block for upper abdominal cancer pain

The use of coeliac plexus block (CPB) to relieve intractable pain owing to upper abdominal malignancy is well established. Significant relief of pain is reported in 70-90% of patients, allowing a reduction in opioid use and in the occurrence of opioid-related side effects (Eisenberg et al, 1995; Prasanna, 1996). Duration of relief varies, but the majority of patients experience relatively pain-free deaths (Patt, 1993). CPB is a relatively safe procedure, and although it is associated with common adverse effects such as diarrhoea, hypotension and local pain, these are mostly transient. However, severe complications, including paraplegia, have been reported. When CPB is performed, nurses should be aware of these potential complications and their management.

Neurolytic celiac plexus block for visceral abdominal malignancy: is prior diagnostic block warranted?

Neurolytic celiac plexus block is a recognised treatment for visceral abdominal pain due to malignancy. The need for a diagnostic celiac plexus block prior to neurolytic blockade is of questionable value, as it may not predict a positive response and may incorrectly predict a lack of response. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic celiac plexus block. The records of 59 patients treated with celiac plexus block during 1994-2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic block was performed on 32 patients prior to the decision for subsequent neurolytic block (Group 1). Another 27 patients were directly treated with a neurolytic celiac plexus block (Group 2). Response of Group 1 to diagnostic and neurolytic blocks was compared. Data from Group 2 was used to project the response of Group 1 should those patients with negative response to diagnostic block proceeded to neurolytic block. A two-by-two table was then constructed. The diagnostic celiac plexus block predicted a positive response with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 37%. The positive predictive value was 85% and the negative predictive value was 58%. The estimated "number needed to test" before a "true" nonrespondent to lytic block to be detected was 16.7. Therefore, a positive response to diagnostic block correlates positively with neurolytic celiac plexus block for abdominal visceral pain due to malignancy. However, diagnostic block is a poor predictor when the response is negative. Hence, its clinical role is questionable and may not be warranted for patients with terminal malignancy.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy-splanchnicectomy for pancreatic cancer pain

Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer often suffer severe pain. Various techniques are available for pain control. We present a patient with pancreatic cancer who underwent unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy-splanchnicectomy and had complete pain relief. This minimally invasive procedure offers promise in carefully selected patients with severe pain from pancreatic cancer and other conditions which are not amenable to conventional interventions.

Regional anaesthesia and medical disease

The present review addresses recent literature on advances in regional anaesthesia and medical diseases, and focuses on expert guidelines and decision-making processes. Attention is also given to risk-benefit ratios in the management of patients with chronic illnesses, difficulties in treatment of the elderly, and associated morbidity and mortality.

MRI-guided celiac plexus block

Celiac plexus block is used as a palliative procedure in cases of severe upper abdominal pain caused by pancreatitis or tumors of the pancreas. It can be guided by bony landmarks, fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), or computed tomography (CT). To avoid severe complications, methods visualizing soft tissue, like CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, are preferable. We describe celiac plexus blocks carried out in an open MR scanner, offering needle guidance with an optical tracking system and near real-time image acquisition. Eight patients with severe chronic abdominal pain were included. In these, 14 celiac blocks were carried out. Good or total pain relief was achieved in 8 of the 14 blocks (57%), a moderate effect in 5 blocks (36%), and no effect in 1 block (7%). The placement of the needle was easily guided with MR in all cases. The MR technique ensures good visualization of soft tissue, direct monitoring of needle movement and avoids exposure to ionizing radiation. Celiac plexus block can safely be carried out in an open MR scanner.