High clinical inflammatory activity prior to the development of secondary progression: a prospective 5-year follow-up study

Disease-modifying therapies for relapsing/active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis - a review of population-specific evidence from randomized clinical trials

Although the understanding of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is evolving, early detection of relapse-independent progression remains difficult. This is further complicated by superimposed relapses and compensatory mechanisms that allow for silent progression. The term relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) subsumes relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and SPMS with relapses. The latter is termed 'active' SPMS, for which disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for either RMS or active SPMS can be used. However, the level of evidence supporting efficacy and safety in SPMS differs between drugs approved for RMS and SPMS. Our review aims to identify current evidence from published clinical trials and European public assessment reports from the marketing authorization procedure on the efficacy, especially on progression, of DMTs approved for RMS and SPMS. To identify relevant evidence, a literature search has been conducted and European public assessment reports of DMTs approved for RMS have been screened for unpublished data specific to SPMS. Only two clinical trials demonstrated a significant reduction in disability progression in SPMS study populations: the EXPAND study for siponimod, which included a typical SPMS population, and the European study for interferon (IFN)-beta 1b s.c., which included patients with very early and active SPMS. Both DMTs also achieved significant reductions in relapse rates. Ocrelizumab, cladribine, ofatumumab, and ponesimod are all approved for RMS - ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ponesimod based on an RMS study, cladribine based on an RRMS study. Data on efficacy in SPMS are only available from post hoc analyses of very small subgroups, representing only up to 15% of the total study population. For these DMTs, approval for RMS, including active SPMS, was mainly based on the assumption that the reduction in relapse rate observed in patients with RRMS can also be applied to SPMS. Based on that, the potential of these drugs to reduce relapse-independent progression remains unclear.

Self-assessment of people with relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis towards burden of disease, progression, and treatment utilization-Results of a large-scale cross-sectional online survey (MS Perspectives)

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the disease course by people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) themselves is important for a better understanding of the complex disease, patient counseling and treatment decisions. This may also facilitate identifying the often-unnoticed transition from relapsing-remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).

OBJECTIVE

MS Perspectives was designed to collect data on patients' self-assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, relapse-independent progression, and impact on everyday life.

METHODS

MS Perspectives is a cross-sectional online survey conducted among adult pwMS in Germany. The questionnaire included 36 items on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 4555 pwMS completed the survey between December 2021 and February 2022, 69.2% had RRMS, 15.1% had SPMS. Relapse-independent worsening of symptoms was reported by 88.9% of RRMS patients with marked to severe and by 61.8% with no or mild to moderate disability. Problems with walking were most frequently (32.1%) mentioned as most bothersome by RRMS patients with marked to severe disability, fatigue, and cognitive impairment by RRMS patients with no or mild to moderate disability.

CONCLUSION

MS Perspectives gives an important insight in the self-assessed disease course and impact on daily life in a large-scale cohort of pwMS.

[Neuropsychological and MRI diagnostics in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis]

Hintergrund

Die Multiple Sklerose ist im longitudinalen Verlauf oft ein Krankheitskontinuum mit initial schubförmig-remittierender Phase (RRMS) und späterer sekundärer Progredienz (SPMS). Die meisten bisher zugelassenen Therapien sind bei SPMS nicht ausreichend wirksam. Die frühe Erkennung der SPMS-Konversion ist daher entscheidend für die Therapiewahl. Wichtige Entscheidungshilfen können dabei die Testung kognitiver Teilleistungen und die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) sein.

Ziel der Arbeit

Darstellung der Bedeutung kognitiver Testungen und von MRT-Untersuchungen für Prädiktion und Erfassung der SPMS-Konversion. Ausarbeitung von Strategien der Verlaufsbeobachtung und Therapiesteuerung in der Praxis, insbesondere in der ambulanten Versorgung.

Material und Methoden

Übersichtsarbeit auf Basis einer unsystematischen Literaturrecherche.

Ergebnisse

Standardisierte kognitive Testung kann für die frühe SPMS-Diagnose hilfreich sein und die Verlaufsbewertung erleichtern. Eine jährliche Anwendung sensitiver Screeningtests wie Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) und Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT‑R) oder der Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS)-Testbatterie ist empfehlenswert. Persistierende inflammatorische Aktivität im MRT in den ersten drei Jahren der Erkrankung sowie das Vorhandensein kortikaler Läsionen sind prädiktiv für eine SPMS-Konversion. Ein standardisiertes MRT-Monitoring auf Merkmale einer progressiven MS kann den klinisch und neurokognitiv begründeten SPMS-Verdacht stützen.

Diskussion

Die interdisziplinäre Versorgung von MS-Patienten durch klinisch versierte Neurologen, unterstützt durch neuropsychologische Testung und MRT, hat einen hohen Stellenwert für die SPMS-Prädiktion und Diagnose. Letztere erlaubt eine frühe Umstellung auf geeignete Therapien, da bei SPMS andere Interventionen als für die RRMS notwendig sind. Nach erfolgter medikamentöser Umstellung erlaubt die klinische, neuropsychologische und bildgebende Vigilanz ein stringentes Monitoring auf neuroinflammatorische und -degenerative Aktivität sowie Therapiekomplikationen.

[Disease-modifying treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis]

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease continuum from a clinically isolated syndrome through relapsing remitting MS to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). There are numerous therapeutic approaches with proven efficacy on relapse and focal inflammatory disease aspects, whereas treatment of secondary progression and associated neuropathological aspects continues to be a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

Overview of the current options for disease-modifying treatment of SPMS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Results of randomized clinical trials are presented and evaluated on a substance-specific basis.

RESULTS

Randomized SPMS trials showed inconsistent results regarding disability progression for beta interferons and negative results for natalizumab. Oral cladribine and ocrelizumab reduced disability progression in relapsing MS but have not been specifically studied in an SPMS population. Positive results for mitoxantrone are only partially applicable to current SPMS patients. For siponimod, a substance that crosses the blood-brain barrier, the EXPAND trial demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of disability progression in typical SPMS. Subgroup analyses suggest a higher efficacy of siponimod in younger patients with active SPMS.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence for the use of previously available disease-modifying treatment in SPMS. Siponimod represents a new therapeutic option for active SPMS, defined by relapses or focal inflammatory MRI activity. To establish the therapeutic indications for siponimod, early detection of relapse-independent progression as well as differentiation of active SPMS from inactive disease are of critical importance.

Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies are thought to reduce the conversion rate to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the rate, chronology, and contributing factors of conversion to the progressive phase in treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

METHODS

Our study included 204 patients treated for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis between 1995 and 2002, prospectively followed to date. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate the time until secondary progressive multiple sclerosis conversion, and multivariate survival analysis with a Cox regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were continuously treated for 13 years (SD 4.5); 36.3% converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis at a mean age of 42.6 years (SD 10.6), a mean time of 8.2 years (SD 5.2) and an estimated mean time of 17.2 years (range 17.1-18.1). A multifocal relapse, age older than 34 years at disease onset and treatment failure independently predicted conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis but did not influence the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The favourable influence of disease-modifying therapies on long-term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is well established. However, the time to progression onset and the subsequent clinical course in treated patients seem similar to those previously reported in natural history studies. More studies are needed to clarify the effect of disease-modifying therapies once the progressive phase has been reached.

Clinical Course of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in Brazilian Patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical course and outcome of multiple sclerosis with progressive onset in Brazilian patients. A total of 238 medical records were reviewed, 26 cases (10.9%) fulfilled Thompson criteria (2000), and 5.80% classified as primary progressive and 5.04% relapsing progressive according to Lublin and Reingold.

STUDY POPULATION

19 Caucasians and 7 non-Caucasians; male:female ratio 1.2:1, mean age at onset was 34 +/- 7.9 years.

RESULTS

Non-Caucasian patients had earlier onset of disease. The most common manifestations at onset were pyramidal and cerebellar (89% and 34.6%). After 11.3 +/- 6.35 years of disease more than 50% of the patients had involvement of most of their functional systems. No statistically significant differences were observed between the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The clinical course and outcome of progressive multiple sclerosis in Brazil, a tropical country with low prevalence, were very similar to those in the multiple sclerosis high prevalence areas.

Vulnerability of human neurons to T cell-mediated cytotoxicity

Axonal and neuronal loss occurs in inflammatory diseases of the CNS such as multiple sclerosis. The cause of the loss remains unclear. We report that polyclonally activated T cells align along axons and soma of cultured human neurons leading to substantial neuronal death. This occurs in an allogeneic and syngeneic manner in the absence of added Ag, requires T cells to be activated, and is mediated through cell contact-dependent mechanisms involving FasL, LFA-1, and CD40 but not MHC class I. Activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets are equally neuronal cytotoxic. In contrast to neurons, other CNS cell types (oligodendrocytes and astrocytes) are not killed by T cells. These results demonstrate for the first time the high and selective vulnerability of human neurons to T cells, and suggest that when enough activated T cells accumulate in the CNS, neuronal cytotoxicity can result through Ag-independent non-MHC class I mechanisms.