1
|
Abuali I, Mathew A, Rugengamanzi E, Sainamthip P, Verduzco-Aguirre H, Parikh AR. Guiding Principles for Community Building in Global Oncology. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e100045. [PMID: 38768401 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
With the escalating incidence and prevalence of cancer worldwide disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for the global oncology community to foster bidirectional partnerships and an equitable exchange of knowledge, resources, and expertise. A dedicated Global Oncology Community of Practice (CoP) can serve as a self-organizing, grassroots approach for members, with common goals and values, to coordinate efforts, maximize impact, and ensure sustainable outcomes. It is imperative, however, when outlining goals and priorities to adhere to an ethical and appropriate framework during community building efforts to avoid perpetuating inequities and power imbalances. This article reviews the core guiding principles for ASCO's Global Oncology CoP which includes responsibility, amplification, accessibility, sustainability, and decolonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inas Abuali
- Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Aju Mathew
- Ernakulam Medical Centre and MOSC Medical College, Kochi, India
| | - Eulade Rugengamanzi
- Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda
| | - Panot Sainamthip
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Haydeé Verduzco-Aguirre
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pourmir I, Van Halteren HK, Elaidi R, Trapani D, Strasser F, Vreugdenhil G, Clarke M. A conceptual framework for cautious escalation of anticancer treatment: How to optimize overall benefit and obviate the need for de-escalation trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102693. [PMID: 38330752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The developmental workflow of the currently performed phase 1, 2 and 3 cancer trial stages lacks essential information required for the determination of the optimal efficacy threshold of new anticancer regimens. Due to this there is a serious risk of overdosing and/or treating for an unnecessary long time, leading to excess toxicity and a higher financial burden for society. But often post-approval de-escalation trials for dose-optimization and treatment de-intensification are not performed due to failing resources and time. Therefore, the developmental workflow needs to be restructured toward cautious systemic cancer treatment escalation, in order to guarantee optimal efficacy and sustainability. METHODS In this manuscript we discuss opportunities to produce the information needed for cautious escalation, based on models of cancer growth and cancer kill kinetics as well as exploratory biomarkers, for the purpose of designing the optimal phase 3 superiority trial. Subsequently, we compare the sample size needed for a phase 3 superiority trial, followed by a necessary de-escalation trial with the sample size needed for a multi-arm phase 3 trial with intervention arms of differing intensity. All essential items are structured within a Framework for Cautious Escalation (FCE). The discussion uses illustrations from the breast cancer setting, but aims to be applicable for all cancers. RESULTS The FCE is a promising model of clinical development in oncology to prevent overtreatment and associated issues, especially with regard to the number of repetitive treatment cycles. It will hopefully increase the relevance and success rate of clinical trials, to deliver improved patient-centric outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Pourmir
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; INSERM U970, Paris Research Cardiovascular Center, Paris, France
| | - H K Van Halteren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adrz Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands.
| | - R Elaidi
- Consultant/advisor in Clinical Trials Methodology and Biostatistic, Paris, France
| | - D Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Strasser
- Center for Integrative Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Gallen, St. Gallen University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Vreugdenhil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M Clarke
- Professor and Director of Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smale EM, van den Bemt BJF, Heerdink ER, Desar IME, Egberts TCG, Bekker CL. Cost Savings and Waste Reduction Through Redispensing Unused Oral Anticancer Drugs: The ROAD Study. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:87-94. [PMID: 37971730 PMCID: PMC10654927 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance New strategies targeting waste are required to improve financial and ecologic sustainability of expensive therapies, such as oral anticancer drugs, that frequently remain unused by patients. Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs seems to be a promising strategy when drug quality is guaranteed. Objectives To determine the waste reduction and net cost savings attained by redispensing oral anticancer drugs that go unused by patients compared with the standard practice of disposal. Design, Settings, and Participants The ROAD study was a prospective single-group intervention conducted in the outpatient pharmacies of 4 hospitals in the Netherlands from February 1, 2021, to February 1, 2023, with 12-month follow-up of each patient. Patients with cancer and who had a prescription for an oral anticancer drug that could be stored at room temperature were included. Of 2426 eligible patients, 602 did not consent and 601 did not respond. Data analyses were performed from August 25, 2022, to April 19, 2023. Intervention Participants received oral anticancer drugs for use at home in special packaging (ie, sealed packaging with time-temperature indicator), to be returned to the pharmacy should these remain unused. The pharmacy ensured quality of returned drugs based on authenticity, appearance, remaining shelf life and adequate storage temperature. Drugs fulfilling quality requirements were redispensed to other patients. Main Outcome and Measure Total waste reduction and mean net annual cost savings per patient compared with the standard practice of disposal. Optimization of cost savings was explored by introducing variations in the quality assurance procedure and patient population. All analyses used the average exchange rate for 2021 €1 = US $1.18. Results Of 1223 patients with cancer who consented, 1071 participated (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 622 [58.1%] were male). In all, 171 patients (16.0%; 95% CI, 13.8%-18.3%) returned 335 unused oral anticancer drug packages. Of the returned drugs, 228 packages were redispensed, which reduced waste by 68.1% (95% CI, 67.7%-68.5%) compared with the standard practice (disposal). Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs comprised 2.4% (95% CI, 2.2%-2.5%) of total drug costs, providing mean net annual cost savings of US $680 (95% CI, $524-$837) up to $1591 (95% CI, $1226-$2002) per participant. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this multicenter intervention study indicate that redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs is associated with waste reduction and cost savings, which in turn may improve the affordability and sustainability of cancer treatment. Trial Registration World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Identifier: NL9208.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth M. Smale
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J. F. van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
| | - Eibert R. Heerdink
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratory, Genetics and Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Research Group Innovations of Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M. E. Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Toine C. G. Egberts
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratory, Genetics and Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gong J, Sihag V, Kong Q, Zhao L. Visualizing Knowledge Evolution Trends and Research Hotspots of Personal Health Data Research: Bibliometric Analysis. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9:e31142. [PMID: 34723823 PMCID: PMC8593818 DOI: 10.2196/31142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The recent surge in clinical and nonclinical health-related data has been accompanied by a concomitant increase in personal health data (PHD) research across multiple disciplines such as medicine, computer science, and management. There is now a need to synthesize the dynamic knowledge of PHD in various disciplines to spot potential research hotspots. Objective The aim of this study was to reveal the knowledge evolutionary trends in PHD and detect potential research hotspots using bibliometric analysis. Methods We collected 8281 articles published between 2009 and 2018 from the Web of Science database. The knowledge evolution analysis (KEA) framework was used to analyze the evolution of PHD research. The KEA framework is a bibliometric approach that is based on 3 knowledge networks: reference co-citation, keyword co-occurrence, and discipline co-occurrence. Results The findings show that the focus of PHD research has evolved from medicine centric to technology centric to human centric since 2009. The most active PHD knowledge cluster is developing knowledge resources and allocating scarce resources. The field of computer science, especially the topic of artificial intelligence (AI), has been the focal point of recent empirical studies on PHD. Topics related to psychology and human factors (eg, attitude, satisfaction, education) are also receiving more attention. Conclusions Our analysis shows that PHD research has the potential to provide value-based health care in the future. All stakeholders should be educated about AI technology to promote value generation through PHD. Moreover, technology developers and health care institutions should consider human factors to facilitate the effective adoption of PHD-related technology. These findings indicate opportunities for interdisciplinary cooperation in several PHD research areas: (1) AI applications for PHD; (2) regulatory issues and governance of PHD; (3) education of all stakeholders about AI technology; and (4) value-based health care including “allocative value,” “technology value,” and “personalized value.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianxia Gong
- School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Vikrant Sihag
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Qingxia Kong
- Department of Technology and Operations Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lindu Zhao
- School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Costa B, Amorim I, Gärtner F, Vale N. Understanding Breast cancer: from conventional therapies to repurposed drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci 2020; 151:105401. [PMID: 32504806 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and is considered a developed country disease. Moreover, is a heterogenous disease, existing different types and stages of breast cancer development, therefore, better understanding of cancer biology, helps to improve the development of therapies. The conventional treatments accessible after diagnosis, have the main goal of controlling the disease, by improving survival. In more advance stages the aim is to prolong life and symptom palliation care. Surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are the main options available, which must be adapted to each person individually. However, patients are developing resistance to the conventional therapies. This resistance is due to alterations in important regulatory pathways such as PI3K/AKt/mTOR, this pathway contributes to trastuzumab resistance, a reference drug to treat breast cancer. Therefore, is proposed the repurposing of drugs, instead of developing drugs de novo, for example, to seek new medical treatments within the drugs available, to be used in breast cancer treatment. Providing safe and tolerable treatments to patients, and new insights to efficacy and efficiency of breast cancer treatments. The economic and social burden of cancer is enormous so it must be taken measures to relieve this burden and to ensure continued access to therapies to all patients. In this review we focus on how conventional therapies against breast cancer are leading to resistance, by reviewing those mechanisms and discussing the efficacy of repurposed drugs to fight breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Costa
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Irina Amorim
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo 228, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Fátima Gärtner
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo 228, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Vale
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo 228, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kandolf Sekulovic L, Guo J, Agarwala S, Hauschild A, McArthur G, Cinat G, Wainstein A, Caglevic C, Lorigan P, Gogas H, Alvarez M, Duncombe R, Lebbe C, Peris K, Rutkowski P, Stratigos A, Forsea AM, De La Cruz Merino L, Kukushkina M, Dummer R, Hoeller C, Gorry C, Bastholt L, Herceg D, Neyns B, Vieira R, Arenberger P, Bylaite-Bucinskiene M, Babovic N, Banjin M, Putnik K, Todorovic V, Kirov K, Ocvirk J, Zhukavets A, Ymeri A, Stojkovski I, Garbe C. Access to innovative medicines for metastatic melanoma worldwide: Melanoma World Society and European Association of Dermato-oncology survey in 34 countries. Eur J Cancer 2018; 104:201-209. [PMID: 30388700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
According to data from recent studies from Europe, a large percentage of patients have restricted access to innovative medicines for metastatic melanoma. Melanoma World Society and European Association of Dermato-oncology conducted a Web-based survey on access to first-line recommended treatments for metastatic melanoma by current guidelines (National Comprehensive Center Network, European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO] and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/European Association of Dermato-oncology/European dermatology Forum) among melanoma experts from 27 European countries, USA, China, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico from September 1st, 2017 to July 1st, 2018. Data on licencing and reimbursement of medicines and the number of patient treated were correlated with the data on health expenditure per capita (HEPC), Mackenbach score of health policy performance, health technology assessment (HTA), ASCO and ESMO Magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESMO MCBS) scores of clinical benefit and market price of medicines. Regression analysis for evaluation of correlation between the parameters was carried out using SPSS software. The estimated number of patients without access in surveyed countries was 13768. The recommended BRAFi + MEKi combination and anti-PD1 immunotherapy were fully reimbursed/covered in 19 of 34 (55.8%) and 17 of 34 (50%) countries, and combination anti-CTLA4+anti-PD1 in was fully covered in 6 of 34 (17.6%) countries. Median delay in reimbursement was 991 days, and it was in significant correlation with ESMO MCBS (p = 0.02), median market price (p = 0.001), HEPC and Mackenbach scores (p < 0.01). Price negotiations or managed entry agreements (MEAs) with national authorities were necessary for reimbursement. In conclusion, great discrepancy exists in metastatic melanoma treatment globally. Access to innovative medicines is in correlation with economic parameters as well as with healthcare system performance parameters. Patient-oriented drug development, market access and reimbursement pathways must be urgently found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kandolf Sekulovic
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
| | - J Guo
- Department of Urology and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, PR China
| | - S Agarwala
- St. Luke's University Hospital and Temple University, Bethlehem, USA
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - G McArthur
- Divisions of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - G Cinat
- Médica Oncóloga Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Universidad de Buenos Aires Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Wainstein
- Institute of Post-graduation, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCM-MG) - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil
| | - C Caglevic
- Medical Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Clinica Alemana Santiago, Faculty of Medicine Clinica Alemana-Universidad Del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - P Lorigan
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - H Gogas
- 1(st)Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko Hospital and 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Alvarez
- Medico en Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City Area, Mexico
| | - R Duncombe
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C Lebbe
- APHP Dermatology Department, University Paris 7 Diderot, INSERM U976, PARIS, France
| | - K Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - P Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Stratigos
- 1(st)Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko Hospital and 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A-M Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Romania
| | - L De La Cruz Merino
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - R Dummer
- UniversitätsSpital Zürich-Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Gorry
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - L Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - D Herceg
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zagreb, Croatia
| | - B Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Vieira
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - P Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Charles University 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - N Babovic
- Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Banjin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - K Putnik
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - V Todorovic
- Clinic for Oncology and Radiotherapy, Podgorica, Montenegro
| | - K Kirov
- Clinic of Oncodermatology, National Cancer Center, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - J Ocvirk
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - A Zhukavets
- Belarusian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education (BelMAPE), Minsk, Belarus
| | - A Ymeri
- University Hospital Mother Theresa, Tirana, Albania
| | - I Stojkovski
- University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - C Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|