Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Variant Histology and/or Sarcomatoid Features

The New WHO Category of "Molecularly Defined Renal Carcinomas": Clinical and Diagnostic Features and Management Implications

The evolution of classification of renal tumors has been impacted since the turn of the millennium by rapid progress in histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics. Together, these features have enabled firm recognition of specific, classic types of renal cell carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, that in current practice trigger histologic-type specific management and treatment protocols. Now, the fifth Edition World Health Classification's new category of "Molecularly defined renal carcinomas" changes the paradigm, defining a total of seven entities based specifically on their fundamental molecular underpinnings. These tumors, which include TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-altered, ELOC-mutated, fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, encompass a wide clinical and histopathologic phenotypic spectrum of tumors. Already, important management aspects are apparent for several of these entities, while emerging therapeutic angles are coming into view. A brief, clinically-oriented introduction of the entities in this new category, focusing on relevant diagnostic, molecular, and management aspects, is the subject of this review.

Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: New Biologic Understanding Leads to Therapeutic Advances

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the 10 most commonly diagnosed solid tumors. Most RCCs are histologically defined as clear cell, comprising approximately 75% of diagnoses. However, the remaining RCC cases are composed of a heterogeneous combination of diverse histopathologic subtypes, each with unique pathogeneses and clinical features. Although the therapeutic approach to both localized and metastatic RCCs has dramatically changed, first with the advent of antiangiogenic targeted therapies and more recently with the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations, these advances have primarily benefited the clear cell RCC patient population. As such, there remains critical gaps in the optimization of treatment regimens for patients with non-clear cell, or variant, RCC histologies. Herein, we detail recent advances in understanding the biology of RCC with variant histology and how such findings have guided novel clinical studies investigating precision oncology approaches for these rare subtypes. Among the most common variant histology RCCs are papillary RCC, comprising approximately 15%-20% of all diagnoses. Although a histopathologically diverse subset of tumors, papillary RCC is canonically associated with amplification of the MET protooncogene; recently completed and ongoing trials have investigated MET-directed therapies for this patient population. Finally, we discuss the unique biology of RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and the recent clinical findings detailing its paradoxical sensitivity to ICIs.

Safety and Efficacy of Second-Line TKI Plus Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend clinical trials or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the first-line option for systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) with limited efficacy. However, the preferred subsequent options remain unclear when patients progress after first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy as the second-line regimen in nccRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020. The baseline characteristics of the patients and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The current study enrolled 65 patients, with a median age of 48 (interquartile 37-60) years. Among all patients, 21 received TKI monotherapy while 44 patients received combination therapy (TKI plus anti-PD1). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 38.5% and 56.9%, respectively. ORR (50.0% vs. 14.3%, P = .006) and DCR (70.5% vs. 28.6%, P = .001) were improved in the combination group compared with the TKI group. The overall second-line PFS was 7.7 (95% CI: 6.1-9.3) months and OS was 25.2 (19.5-30.8) months. Patients receiving combination therapy had a longer PFS compared with those receiving TKI monotherapy [median PFS (95% CI): 9.2 (5.9-12.4) vs. 5.4 (2.6-8.2) m, Log-rank P = .002]. The incidence of treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher was comparable between the 2 groups (56.8% vs. 52.4%).

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy appeared effective and safe in the treatment of patients with metastatic nccRCC who progressed after first-line TKIs.

Treatment of metastatic TFE3 microphthalmia transcription factor translocation renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Background

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor/transcription factor E (MiTF/TFE) translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare type of non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), which is more common in females. Currently, there is no standardized treatment for advanced metastatic microphthalmia translocation RCC (MiT-RCC). The main treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and targeted therapy against the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) factor signaling pathway.

Case Description

We present the case of an 8-year-old male patient with hematuria and paroxysmal urinary pain. Based on tumor genetic testing results and targeted drug matching analysis, the patient underwent tumor biopsy, tumor radical surgery with vascular osteotomy, and cervicothoracic lymph node dissection. The patient was then treated with a combination of immunotherapy [sintilimab, a drug directed against programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)] and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (from pazopanib to sunitinib). Throughout the 10 cycles of conventional chemotherapy (seven courses of sintilimab since the start of the third chemotherapy treatment), the patient's condition remained stable, with no tumor recurrence at the primary site. However, in the later stages, the patient developed a large amount of ascites, and the family requested discontinuation of treatment, ultimately leading to the patient's death.

Conclusions

In this case report, we summarize the therapeutic strategy of a young patient with metastatic transcription factor E3 (TFE3) MiT-RCC. For this disease, early immunotherapy and the use of precision-targeted drugs may have a favorable impact on the survival prognosis of the patient but may still be of less benefit in children with advanced multiple metastases. Therefore, further research on tumor driver genes, among other treatment components, is urgently needed to improve precision therapy.

Advances in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma management: From heterogeneous biology to treatment options

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) makes up nearly one quarter of all RCC subtypes, commonly impacts younger patients, and is often metastatic at presentation. Compared to clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC typically has a worse prognosis in the metastatic setting, with overall survival durations that are ~10 months shorter. The nccRCC consists of a wide range of different histological subtypes, the majority of which are composed of papillary, chromophobe, renal medullary carcinoma, translocation RCC, collecting duct carcinoma and unclassified RCC. Most clinical trials have either excluded or only included small numbers of patients with nccRCC; owing to the lack of prospective studies focusing on this population, data on response rates and survival outcomes are lacking. NccRCC treatment is a nascent field with various therapeutic modalities and combinations under investigation, often based on data extrapolated from therapeutic studies in ccRCC. We herein review the use and outcomes of cytotoxic chemotherapy, various combination modalities of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents. We discuss active ongoing clinical trials for patients with nccRCC and future directions in the treatment of this rare disease. Historically, treatment for nccRCC has been adopted from the standard of care for patients with ccRCC, although these treatments are less effective in the nccRCC population. As we begin to understand the underlying biology of these tumors, clinical trials have been able to slowly accrue and include more patients with various subtypes of nccRCC. There remains much room for improvement in this area of need, but there is hope on the horizon.

Localised non-metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: a 31-year externally verified study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate post-nephrectomy outcomes and predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with localised sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) and those with Grade 4 RCC (non-sRCC), as most sRCC research focuses on advanced or metastatic disease with limited studies analysing outcomes of patients with localised non-metastatic sRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 564 patients with localised RCC underwent partial or radical nephrectomy between June 1988 to March 2019 for sRCC (n = 204) or World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Grade 4 non-sRCC (n = 360). The CSS at every stage between groups was assessed. Phase III ASSURE clinical trial data were used to externally validate the CSS findings. The Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-squared test compared outcomes and the Kaplan-Meier method evaluated CSS, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival. Clinicopathological features associated with RCC death were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31.5 months. The median OS and CSS between the sRCC and Grade 4 non-sRCC groups was 45 vs 102 months and 49 vs 152 months, respectively (P < 0.001). At every stage, sRCC had worse CSS compared to Grade 4 non-sRCC. Notably, pT1 sRCC had worse CSS than pT3 Grade 4 non-sRCC. Negative predictors of CSS were sarcomatoid features, non-clear cell histology, positive margins, higher stage (pT3/pT4), and use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). ASSURE external verification showed worse CSS in patients with sRCC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.36; P = 0.01), but not worse outcomes in MIS surgery (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.75-2.56; P = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Localised sRCC had worse CSS compared to Grade 4 non-sRCC at every stage. Negative survival predictors included positive margins, higher pathological stage, use of MIS, and non-clear cell histology. sRCC is an aggressive variant even at low stages requiring vigilant surveillance and possible inclusion in adjuvant therapy trials.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.

The incidence, pathogenesis, and management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and is divided into two distinct subtypes, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). Although many treatments exist for RCC, these are largely based on clinical trials performed in ccRCC and there are limited studies on the management of nccRCC. Non-clear cell RCC consists of multiple histological subtypes: papillary, chromophobe, translocation, medullary, collecting duct, unclassified, and other rare histologies. Due to variations in pathogenesis and therapeutic response, therapy should be tailored to specific variant histologies. For patients with localized nccRCC, surgical resection remains the gold standard. In the metastatic setting, the standard of care has yet to be clearly defined, and most guidelines recommend clinical trial participation. General therapeutic options include immunotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination, targeted therapies such as vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and MET inhibitors, and chemotherapy in certain subtypes. Here we present a review of the incidence and pathogenesis of the various subtypes, as well as available clinical data to support therapeutic recommendations for these subtypes. We also highlight currently available clinical trials in nccRCC and future directions in investigating novel treatment modalities tailored to patients with variant histology.

Current status and future perspective of immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma

In the last decade, the standard treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has evolved, mainly driven by the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Currently, ICI monotherapy and ICI-based combinations with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and targeted therapies against mammalian target of rapamycin or vascular endothelial growth factor have become new standard treatments for first-line and subsequent-line therapies. ICIs play an important role as an adjuvant postoperative therapy, and this field is the subject of active research. Furthermore, ongoing randomized controlled trials are investigating the clinical value of more intense treatments by combining multiple effective treatments for RCC. Additionally, novel biomarkers for prognosis have been investigated. This study reviews the current evidence on immunotherapy as a treatment for RCC patients, randomized controlled trials, and ongoing studies including RCC patients and recent findings, and discusses future perspectives.

Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Non-Clear Cell Histology Treated With Systemic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation have been under-represented in clinical trials. This study evaluates the outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with non-clear cell RCC and RCC with sarcomatoid features compared to those with clear cell RCC receiving systemic therapy.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC receiving systemic therapy was conducted. Patients were divided into groups based on histology: nonclear cell RCC, clear cell RCC, and RCC with and without sarcomatoid features. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) for each group calculated from the date of diagnosis of advanced or metastatic RCC to the date of last follow-up or death. Additionally, an exploratory analysis was conducted by nonclear cell type and type of first-line treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 251 patients were included, with most treated before 2018. First-line therapies included vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy (68.5%), immunotherapy monotherapy (7.6%), immunotherapy combination therapy (16.7%), or other treatments (7.2%). Overall survival was shorter for patients with nonclear cell RCC compared to clear cell RCC (39.2 months vs. 81.1 months, hazard ratio (HR), 1.60, 95% Confidence Interval 1.0, 2.6, P = .04). Additionally, OS for patients with sarcomatoid differentiation was shorter compared to patients without sarcomatoid differentiation (43.4 vs. 75.0 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8, 2.6, P = .20).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate inferior outcomes among patients with advanced or metastatic nonclear cell RCC and RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation receiving systemic treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted testing immunotherapy combinations and novel treatments in patients with nonclear cell RCC.

Treatment Landscape of Renal Cell Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment landscape of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has evolved significantly over the past three decades. Active surveillance and tumor ablation are alternatives to extirpative therapy in appropriately selected patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging noninvasive alternative to treat primary RCC tumors. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has greatly improved the overall survival of advanced RCC, and now the ICI-based doublet (dual ICI-ICI doublet; or ICI in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ICI-TKI doublet) has become the standard frontline therapy. Based on unprecedented outcomes in the metastatic with ICIs, they are also being explored in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting for patients with high-risk disease. Adjuvant pembrolizumab has proven efficacy to reduce the risk of RCC recurrence after nephrectomy. Historically considered a radioresistant tumor, SBRT occupies an expanding role to treat RCC with oligometastasis or oligoprogression in combination with systemic therapy. Furthermore, SBRT is being investigated in combination with ICI-doublet in the advanced disease setting. Lastly, given the treatment paradigm is shifting to adopt ICIs at earlier disease course, the prospective studies guiding treatment sequencing in the post-ICI setting is maturing. The effort is ongoing in search of predictive biomarkers to guide optimal treatment option in RCC.

Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: Biology and Therapies

The term variant histology renal cell carcinomas (vhRCCs), also known as non-clear cell RCCs, refers to a diverse group of malignancies with distinct biologic and therapeutic considerations. The management of vhRCC subtypes is often based on extrapolating results from the more common clear cell RCC studies or basket trials that are not specific to each histology. The unique management of each vhRCC subtype necessitates accurate pathologic diagnosis and dedicated research efforts. Herein, we discuss tailored recommendations for each vhRCC histology informed by ongoing research and clinical experience.

Patient-reported Outcome Measurement and Reporting for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review

CONTEXT

In the oncology setting, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide important data that help to ensure patient-relevant endpoints are captured and reported. Use of this information for treatment decision-making by clinicians and patients in real-world settings is facilitated by consistent and transparent reporting of trial methods.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and compare PROMs used in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) trials in terms of the rationale for the choice of measure, endpoint hierarchy (primary, secondary, exploratory), assessment time points, statistical methods, and statistical metrics for interpretation.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review via searches of four online databases (2016-2021) and recent conference abstracts (2019-2021) identified 2616 articles, of which 33 were included in the review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Among the 33 clinical studies included, 19 different PROMs were identified: three kidney cancer-specific scales, two cancer-specific scales, two generic scales, and 12 symptom-specific scales. The endpoint hierarchy for patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment was reported in 42% of the studies; one study included PROs as a primary endpoint. Reporting of time points, minimal important differences, and statistical analyses was highly heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

A diverse range of PROMs have been included in clinical studies for patients with advanced/metastatic RCC. Prespecified analyses for PRO assessments were generally not stated, while analytical methods and reporting varied. An improvement in alignment across studies would better inform regulatory, market-access, reimbursement, and clinical decision-making to improve patient care.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed how the impact of cancer therapies on health outcomes from the patient's point of view is being measured in clinical trials for kidney cancer. The techniques and reporting varied across trials. Standardisation of how these data are captured and reported may improve care and decision-making for patients with kidney cancer.

Systemic Treatment for Advanced and Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Examining Modern Therapeutic Strategies for a Notoriously Challenging Malignancy

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that represents 25% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases. Treatment for non-clear cell histologies is mostly based on evidence from small phase II clinical trials or extrapolated from successful therapies in clear cell RCC because of the low incidence of non-clear cell pathology. Advances in genomic profiling have improved clinicians' understanding of molecular targets for nccRCC, such as altered mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene status and fumarate hydratase (FH) gene inactivation, but patient outcomes remain poor and optimal management of this disease remains unclear. This review assesses outcomes by histologic subtype from 27 prospective and 13 ongoing clinical trials to identify therapeutic strategies for advanced or metastatic nccRCC. Vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as sunitinib, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as everolimus, have demonstrated efficacy and remain viable treatment options, with a preference for sunitinib. However, everolimus is preferred in patients with chromophobe RCC because folliculin (FLCN) gene mutations upregulate the mTOR pathway. Novel TKIs, such as cabozantinib, show improved outcomes in patients with papillary RCC because of targeted MET inhibition. Platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be the recommended treatment strategy for collecting duct and medullary RCC. Clinically meaningful antitumor activity has been observed across all non-clear cell histologies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab. Ongoing trials are evaluating novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combination regimens, with an emphasis on the promising MET-inhibitor cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib.

An Overview of Systemic Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma, with a Focus on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases

The most commonly diagnosed malignancy of the urinary system is represented by renal cell carcinoma. Various subvariants of RCC were described, with a clear-cell type prevailing in about 85% of all RCC tumors. Patients with metastases from renal cell carcinoma did not have many effective therapies until the end of the 1980s, as long as hormonal therapy and chemotherapy were the only options available. The outcomes were unsatisfactory due to the poor effectiveness of the available therapeutic options, but then interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 showed treatment effectiveness, providing benefits but only for less than half of the patients. However, it was not until 2004 that targeted therapies emerged, prolonging the survival rate. Currently, new technologies and strategies are being developed to improve the actual efficacy of available treatments and their prognostic aspects. This article summarizes the mechanisms of action, importance, benefits, adverse events of special interest, and efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on brain metastases.

Circulating and Intratumoral Immune Determinants of Response to Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Variant Histology or Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of variant histology comprises approximately 20% of kidney cancer diagnoses, yet the optimal therapy for these patients and the factors that impact immunotherapy response remain largely unknown. To better understand the determinants of immunotherapy response in this population, we characterized blood- and tissue-based immune markers for patients with variant histology RCC, or any RCC histology with sarcomatoid differentiation, enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Baseline circulating (plasma) inflammatory cytokines were highly correlated with one another, forming an "inflammatory module" that was increased in International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium poor-risk patients and was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.028). At baseline, an elevated circulating vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) level was associated with a lack of response (P = 0.03) and worse PFS (P = 0.021). However, a larger increase in on-treatment levels of circulating VEGF-A was associated with clinical benefit (P = 0.01) and improved overall survival (P = 0.0058). Among peripheral immune cell populations, an on-treatment decrease in circulating PD-L1+ T cells was associated with improved outcomes, with a reduction in CD4+PD-L1+ [HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.91; P = 0.016] and CD8+PD-L1+ T cells (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87; P = 0.009) correlated with improved PFS. Within the tumor itself, a higher percentage of terminally exhausted (PD-1+ and either TIM-3+ or LAG-3+) CD8+ T cells was associated with worse PFS (P = 0.028). Overall, these findings support the value of tumor and blood-based immune assessments in determining therapeutic benefit for patients with RCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and provide a foundation for future biomarker studies for patients with variant histology RCC receiving immunotherapy-based combinations.

A Delphi Study of Core Patient-Reported Outcomes for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

There is little research to help health care professionals understand what patient outcomes are considered a priority in advanced liver or kidney cancer. Knowing what is important to patients can help promote person-centered approaches to treatment and disease management. The aim of this study was to identify those patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that patients, carers, and health care professionals consider as "core" when providing care to those with advanced liver or kidney cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A three-round Delphi study was undertaken to ask experts by profession or experience to rank PROs identified from a previous literature review. Fifty-four experts, including people living with advanced liver or kidney cancer (44.4%), family members and caregivers (9.3%), and health care professionals (46.8%), reached consensus on 49 PROs including 12 new items (eg, palpitations, hopefulness, or social isolation). Items with the highest rate of consensus included quality of life, pain, mental health, and capacity to do daily activities.

CONCLUSION

People living with advanced liver or kidney cancer experience complex health care needs. Some important outcomes were not actually captured in practice in this population and were suggested as part of this study. There are discrepancies between the views of health care professionals, patients, and family in what is important, highlighting the need of using measures to facilitate communication.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Identification of priority PROs reported here will be key to facilitate more focused patient assessments. The actual use of measures in cancer nursing practice to allow monitoring of PROs must be tested for feasibility and usability.

The role of immunotherapy treatment in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the literature

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group representing 15-30% of renal tumors. They are mostly excluded from immunotherapy trials due to their rarity and worse prognosis. This, alongside nccRCC misdiagnosis/misclassification, lack of immune-biomarker expression rate data, lack of homogeneous data reporting, the retrospective nature of many studies, small sample sizes, and the fact that high-grade evidence only stems from trials mostly addressing the clear cell subtype, result in poorly defined treatments. We thus reviewed available data from several clinical trials, retrospective studies, and meta-analyses on immunotherapy responses and their correlation with histological subtypes and prognostic biomarkers. The papillary and unclassified subtypes are the best candidate for immunotherapy, showing response rates up to ~35%. Chromophobe cancers, on the other end, have mostly null response rates. Cancers with sarcomatoid features respond very well to immunotherapy, regardless of their histology. Available data for translocation, medullary, collecting duct, and other nccRCCs are inconclusive. Regarding PD-L1, its expression correlates with better responses, but its prognostic value remains to be determined due to small sample sizes hindering direct statistical comparisons. It is necessary to involve a larger number of nccRCC patients and centers in clinical trials and report tumor response rates and PD-(L)1 and other markers' expression rates divided by nccRCC subtypes and not just for the whole cohorts. This will allow us to collect more robust data to best identify patients who can benefit from immunotherapy and ultimately define the standard of treatment. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL: N/A.

The Changing Landscape of Immunotherapy for Advanced Renal Cancer

The management of advanced renal cell carcinoma has advanced tremendously over the past decade, but most patients still do not receive durable clinical benefit from current therapies. Renal cellcarcinoma is an immunogenic tumor, historically with conventional cytokine therapies, such as interleukin-2 and interferon-α, and contemporarily with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Now the central therapeutic strategy in renal cell carcinoma is combination therapies including immunecheckpoint inhibitors. In this Review, we look back on the historical changes in systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma, and focus on the latest developments and prospects in this field.

Integrated bioinformatic analysis and cell line experiments reveal the significant role of the novel immune checkpoint TIGIT in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma

Background

T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a widely concerned immune checkpoint, which plays an essential role in immunosuppression and immune evasion. However, the role of TIGIT in normal organ tissues and renal clear cell carcinoma is unclear. We aim to identify the critical role of TIGIT in renal clear cell carcinoma and find potential targeted TIGIT drugs.

Materials and methods

Data retrieved from the GTEX database and TCGA database was used to investigate the expression of TIGIT in normal whole-body tissues and abnormal pan-cancer, then the transcriptome atlas of patients with kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) in the TCGA database were applied to distinguish the TIGIT related features, including differential expression status, prognostic value, immune infiltration, co-expression, and drug response of sunitinib an anti-PD1/CTLA4 immunotherapy in KIRC. Furthermore, we constructed a gene-drug network to discover a potential drug targeting TIGIT and verified it by performing molecular docking. Finally, we conducted real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and assays for Transwell migration and CCK-8 to explore the potential roles of TIGIT.

Results

TIGIT showed a moderate expression in normal kidney tissues and was confirmed as an essential prognostic factor that was significantly higher expressed in KIRC tissues, and high expression of TIGIT is associated with poor OS, PFS, and DSS in KIRC. Also, the expression of TIGIT was closely associated with the pathological characteristics of the tumor, high expression of TIGIT in KIRC was observed with several critical functions or pathways such as apoptosis, BCR signaling, TCR signaling et al. Moreover, the expression of TIGIT showed a strong positive correlation with infiltration of CD8+ T cells and Tregs and a positive correlation with the drug sensitivity of sunitinib simultaneously. Further Tide ips score analysis and submap analysis reveal that patients with high TIGIT expression significantly show a better response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy. Following this, we discovered Selumetinib and PD0325901 as potential drugs targeting TIGIT and verified the interaction between these two drugs and TIGIT protein by molecular docking. Finally, we verified the essential role of TIGIT in the proliferation and migration functions by using KIRC cell lines.

Conclusions

TIGIT plays an essential role in tumorigenesis and progression in KIRC. High expression of TIGIT results in poor survival of KIRC and high drug sensitivity to sunitinib. Besides, Selumetinib and PD0325901 may be potential drugs targeting TIGIT, and combined therapy of anti-TIGIT and other treatments show great potential in treating KIRC.

The role of immunotherapy in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The category of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) includes several clinically, histologically, and molecularly diverse entities. Traditionally, they comprise type 1 and type 2 papillary, chromophobe, unclassified, and other histologies (medullary, collecting duct carcinoma, and translocation-associated). Molecular knowledge has allowed the identification of some other specific subtypes, such as fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or succinate dehydrogenase-associated RCC. In addition, it has recognized some alterations with a possible predictive role, e.g., MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) alterations in papillary tumors. Standard therapies for the management of advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC), i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, have shown poorer results in nccRCC patients. Therefore, there is a need to improve the efficacy of the treatment for advanced nccRCC. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), has demonstrated a significant survival benefit in several malignant neoplasias, including ccRCC, with a proportion of patients achieving long survival. The combinations of ICI or ICI + VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care in advanced ccRCC. Unfortunately, major pivotal trials did not include specific nccRCC populations. In recent years, several studies have retrospectively or prospectively evaluated ICIs alone or in combination with another ICI or with TKIs in nccRCC patients. In this article, we review data from available trials in order to elucidate clinical and molecular profiles that could benefit from immunotherapy approaches.

An Update on the Treatment of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second-most common subtype of kidney cancer following clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), representing 15% of kidney cancers. Despite advances in therapy, including combination strategies with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, progress has lagged behind that of ccRCC. This is in part due to the heterogenous nature of the various subtypes of pRCC. More recently, investigators have turned efforts towards histology and biology-based trials. In this review, we outline some of the distinct biological characteristics of pRCC and discuss the most impactful clinical trials to date. Finally, we look ahead to several highly anticipated ongoing trials in pRCC.

Immune Checkpoint Therapy Combinations in Adult Advanced MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

There remains a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) combinations ± vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy (TT) in translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with advanced tRCC treated with ICT combinations at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only cases with confirmed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were included. Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST, and overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients identified with median age of 38 (21-70) years, and F:M ratio 0.9:1. FISH revealed TFE3 and TFEB translocations in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT were used in 18 and 11 patients, respectively. Seventeen (59%) patients received ICT combinations as first-line therapy. ORR was 1/18 (5.5%) for dual ICT and 4/11 (36%) for ICT + VEGF TT. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median PFS was 2.8 and 5.4 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. Median OS from metastatic disease was 17.8 and 30.7 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of advanced tRCC, limited response and survival were seen after frontline dual ICT combination therapy, while ICT + VEGF TT therapy offered some efficacy. Due to the heterogeneity of tRCC, insights into the biological underpinnings are necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Navigating the Current Landscape of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of the Literature

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an entity comprised of a heterogeneous constellation of RCC subtypes. Genomic profiling has broadened our understanding of molecular pathogenic mechanisms unique to individual nccRCC subtypes. To date, clinical trials evaluating the use of immunotherapies and targeted therapies have predominantly been conducted in patients with clear cell histology. A comprehensive review of the literature has been undertaken in order to describe molecular pathogenic mechanisms pertaining to each nccRCC subtype, and concisely summarise findings from therapeutic trials conducted in the nccRCC space.

Biomarkers of Inflammation and Progression During Immunotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Biomarkers that would identify patients unlikely to respond to immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain an unmet medical need.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the present study, we have retrospectively evaluated the association between biomarkers of immune activation and outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with ICIs. The laboratory and clinical data of 79 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed mRCC treated with ICI-based immunotherapy have been analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients who progressed or died at 4 months had higher prognostic score, higher serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and neopterin, and urinary neopterin, and lower serum albumin and hemoglobin concentration.

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers of activation of immune response, in particular serum neopterin/creatinine ratio, are associated with outcome in mRCC patients treated with ICI immunotherapy.

Disease Control Achieved Using Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab in a Patient With Sarcomatoid Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SHCC), a Rare Variant Excluded From the IMbrave150 Trial

Sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC) is a rare variant of liver cancer that lacks treatment options. The IMbrave trail demonstrated the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A + B) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma but excluded patients with sarcomatoid variants. Herein, we describe a case of disease control achieved using the IMbrave regimen in a patient with sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma.

"Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: diagnosis and implications for management"

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising from the distal convoluted tubules. At the time of diagnosis, patients are more frequently symptomatic, with advanced locoregional stage, and have metastatic disease. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System defined diagnostic criteria for this entity. However, the diagnostic features continue to evolve, with typical, but not entirely specific, histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics. In addition, the lack of consistent molecular alterations makes collecting duct carcinoma a diagnosis of exclusion, with historical cases being re-classified as fumarate hydratase deficient RCC, ALK rearranged RCC, renal medullary carcinoma or high-grade urothelial carcinoma. The rarity and poor prognosis of the tumor makes it difficult to reach consensus guidelines to guide therapy. In this manuscript we review the clinicopathologic features of collecting duct carcinoma including pathologic diagnostic criteria, molecular characteristics and differential diagnosis, and their possible implications for management.

Low expression of PEBP1P2 promotes metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by post-transcriptional regulation of PEBP1 and KLF13 mRNA

Background

Pseudogenes play an essential role in tumor occurrence and progression. However, the functions and mechanisms of pseudogenes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain largely elusive.

Methods

We quantified PEBP1P2 expression in ccRCC tissues and cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR. Besides, we evaluated the role of PEBP1P2 in ccRCC using a lung metastasis model and a transwell assay. Finally, we documented the interactions between PEBP1P2, PEBP1, and KLF13 by performing luciferase, RNA immunoprecipitation, RNA pulldown, and targeted RNA demethylation assays.

Results

Low PEBP1P2 expression correlates significantly with advanced stages and poor prognosis in ccRCC patients. Besides, PEBP1P2 overexpression inhibits ccRCC metastasis formation in vivo and in vitro. Interestingly, PEBP1P2 directly interacted with 5-methylcytosine (m5C)-containing PEBP1 mRNA and recruited the YBX1/ELAVL1 complex, stabilizing PEBP1 mRNA. In addition, PEBP1P2 increased KLF13 mRNA levels by acting as a sponge for miR-296, miR-616, and miR-3194.

Conclusions

PEBP1P2 inhibits ccRCC metastasis formation and regulates both PEBP1 and KLF13. Therefore, molecular therapies targeting PEBP1P2 might be an effective treatment strategy against ccRCC and other cancers with low PEBP1P2 levels.

Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Mucosal Melanoma: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Study

PURPOSE

Anti-programmed cell death-1 monotherapy is part of standard therapy for cutaneous melanoma but has low efficacy in mucosal melanoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for advanced mucosal melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study used a Simon's two-stage design. Atezolizumab (fixed-dose, 1,200 mg) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) were administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), determined per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety, with adverse events (AE) summarized using NCI-CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 patients were enrolled, including 20 (46.5%) with unresectable and 23 (53.5%) with metastatic mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up was 13.4 months at data cutoff (July 30, 2021). Forty patients were evaluable for response: ORR was 45.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3%-61.5%; one complete response, 17 partial responses]. Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-9.6); 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 53.4% (95% CI, 36.6%-67.6%) and 28.1% (95% CI, 14.2%-43.9%), respectively. Median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 14.4-NR). Six- and 12-month OS rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 78.5%-97.5%) and 76.0% (95% CI, 57.1%-87.5%), respectively. Median DOR was 12.5 months (95% CI, 5.5-NR). Overall, 90.7% (39/43) of patients experienced treatment-related AEs; 25.6% (11/43) experienced grade ≥3 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma.

Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

First-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) rapidly shifted in recent years with the advent of combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) doublets and combinations of an ICI with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Despite improvements in overall survival and many durable responses, there exists a significant number of patients who fail to respond to these agents, and many patients eventually progress. Given the rapid changes in the front-line setting, it is essential to understand treatment options in refractory mRCC. Here, we review the evidence behind current options for later-line therapies, often involving additional VEGFR-TKIs alone or in combination with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) targeted agents, as well as situations where consideration of immunotherapy rechallenge may be appropriate. Additionally, we describe ongoing clinical trials examining concurrent ICI and TKI in the refractory setting, as well as those studying novel agents, such as targeted drug-antibody conjugates and hypoxia inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitors. Finally, we review considerations for non-clear cell histologies in the refractory setting and mechanisms of resistance in mRCC.

Update in collecting duct carcinoma: Current aspects of the clinical and molecular characterization of an orphan disease

Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma (cdRCC), which until recently was thought to arise from the collecting ducts of Bellini in the renal medulla, is a rare and aggressive type of non-clear renal cell carcinoma (ncRCC), accounting for 1% of all renal tumors and with nearly 50% of patients being diagnosed with Stage IV disease. The median overall survival in this setting is less than 12 months. Several regimens of chemotherapies had been used based on morphologic and cytogenetic similarities with urothelial cell carcinoma described previously, although the prognosis still remains poor. The use of targeted therapies also did not result in favorable outcomes. Recent works using NGS have highlighted genomic alterations in SETD2, CDKN2A, SMARCB1, and NF2. Moreover, transcriptomic studies have confirmed the differences between urothelial carcinoma and cdRCC, the possible true origin of this disease in the distal convoluted tubule (DCT), differentiating from other RCC (e.g., clear cell and papillary) that derive from the proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), and enrichment in immune cells that may harbor insights in novel treatment strategies with immunotherapy and target agents. In this review, we update the current aspects of the clinical, molecular characterization, and new targeted therapeutic options for Collecting duct carcinoma and highlight the future perspectives of treatment in this setting.

Advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, genomic drivers, current therapies, and ongoing trials

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the most common subtype of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PRCC can be subdivided into types 1 and 2 based on histology, each associated with different genetic mutations. The MET gene is commonly altered in type 1 PRCC while multiple alterations are involved in type 2 PRCC. PRCC is an aggressive cancer with a predominance in male and black patients and poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, there was a lack of convincing prospective data to guide treatment; hence, therapies were previously extrapolated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma with mixed results. More recently, some phase 2 trials focused on PRCC have been promising. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy is considered the standard of care, and combination strategies with TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors are emerging. Genetic profiling and large-scale clinical trials are needed to inform targeted treatment of PRCC.

Real world data of diagnosis, survival, and treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an heterogenous group, usually excluded from phase 3 trials. We report real life data of prognosis and systemic management of those patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 102 metastatic nccRCC patients (unspecified papillary, n = 10; type 1 and 2 papillary n = 10 and n = 32; translocation RCC, n = 9; chromophobe, n = 14; collecting duct, n = 14) treated between 2006 and 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent pathological review, 40.8% presented a complete histological discordance. First line treatments were mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitor (60.8%), combination including immunotherapy (7.8%) or combination of chemotherapy (13.7%). Median ORR ranged from 0% in unspecified papillary RCC to 42.9% in type 1 papillary RCC. Median PFS ranged from 2.9 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 10.9 months in type 1 papillary RCC. Median OS ranged from 6.8 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 29.1 months in MiT family translocation RCC. Thirty (29.4%) patients were included in a treatment trial during their treatment course.

CONCLUSION

Metastatic nccRCC patients have variable prognosis due to heterogeneity of histological subtypes. Their diagnosis and access to therapeutic innovation remain suboptimal. Dedicated prospective trials are needed.

Inducing vascular normalization: A promising strategy for immunotherapy

In solid tumors, the vasculature is highly abnormal in structure and function, resulting in the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by limiting immune cells infiltration into tumors. Vascular normalization is receiving much attention as an alternative strategy to anti-angiogenic therapy, and its potential therapeutic targets include signaling pathways, angiogenesis-related genes, and metabolic pathways. Endothelial cells play an important role in the formation of blood vessel structure and function, and their metabolic processes drive blood vessel sprouting in parallel with the control of genetic signals in cancer. The feedback loop between vascular normalization and immunotherapy has been discussed extensively in many reviews. In this review, we summarize the impact of aberrant tumor vascular structure and function on drug delivery, metastasis, and anti-tumor immune responses. In addition, we present evidences for the mutual regulation of immune vasculature. Based on the importance of endothelial metabolism in controlling angiogenesis, we elucidate the crosstalk between endothelial cells and immune cells from the perspective of metabolic pathways and propose that targeting abnormal endothelial metabolism to achieve vascular normalization can be an alternative strategy for cancer treatment, which provides a new theoretical basis for future research on the combination of vascular normalization and immunotherapy.

Selenoprotein S regulates tumorigenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma through AKT/ GSK3β/NF-κB signaling pathway

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most lethal genitourinary tumors with rapid progression and metastasis. Selenoprotein S (SELS), which is broadly expressed in human tissues, has been reported to be involved in ER homeostasis and inflammation. However, the biological roles of SELS in ccRCC remain unclear. In this study, we found that SELS expression was significantly higher in ccRCC and correlated with multiple clinicopathological features. Overexpression of SELS could promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis in 786-O cells, whereas silence of SELS elicited opposite effect. Further mechanistic studies revealed that SELS enhanced cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis through activating AKT/GSK3β/NF-κB signaling pathway. Besides, SELS could stabilize c-Myc by preventing ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Interestingly, we found that SELS could also inhibit migration of ccRCC cell likely through repressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Collectively, our findings suggested that SELS promoted tumor progression, and inhibited apoptosis and migration through AKT/GSK3β/NF-κB signaling pathway and EMT in ccRCC.

MiTF/TFE Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas: From Clinical Entities to Molecular Insights

MiTF/TFE translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of RCC representing the most prevalent RCC in the pediatric population (up to 40%) and making up 4% of all RCCs in adults. It is characterized by translocations involving either TFE3 (TFE3-tRCC), TFEB (TFEB-tRCC) or MITF, all members of the MIT family (microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor). TFE3-tRCC was first recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of kidney cancers in 2004. In contrast to TFEB-tRCC, TFE3-tRCC is associated with many partners that can be detected by RNA or exome sequencing. Both diagnoses of TFE3 and TFEB-tRCC are performed on morphological and immunohistochemical features, but, to date, TFE break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical behavior of tRCC is heterogeneous and more aggressive in adults. Management of metastatic tRCC is challenging, especially in the younger population, and data are scarce. Efficacy of the standard of care-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remains low. Recent integrative exome and RNA sequencing analyses have provided a better understanding of the biological heterogeneity, which can contribute to a better therapeutic approach. We describe the clinico-pathological entities, the response to systemic therapy and the molecular features and techniques used to diagnose tRCC.

Outcomes of patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated impressive activity in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and have become standard treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Data supporting the effectiveness of ICI-based therapy in advanced non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) is more limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) to evaluate the outcomes of patients with advanced nccRCC. Patients were classified into three groups based on first-line therapy: ICI-based therapy (monotherapy or combination), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor monotherapy, or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor monotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF) and objective response rate (ORR). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to compare OS and TTF between treatment groups and Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for prognostic covariates.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 1145 patients with metastatic nccRCC. The most common subtype was papillary RCC (54.9%). For first-line therapy, 74.3% received VEGF monotherapy, 15% received mTOR monotherapy, and 10.7% received ICI-based therapy. Median OS in the ICI group was 28.6 months, versus 16.4 months in the VEGF group and 12.2 months in the mTOR group. Median TTF in the ICI group was 6.9 months, versus 5.0 months in the VEGF group and 3.9 months in the mTOR group. ORR was 27.2% in the ICI group, 14.5% in the VEGF group, and 9% in the mTOR group. After adjusting for the IMDC risk group, histological subtype, and age, the hazard ratio for OS was 0.57 (95% CI 0.42-0.78, p < 0.0001) for ICI versus VEGF and 0.50 (95% CI 0.36-0.71, p < 0.0001) for ICI versus mTOR.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced nccRCC, first-line ICI-based treatment appears to be associated with improved OS compared to VEGF and mTOR targeted therapy. These results should be confirmed in prospective randomised trials.

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Targeted Therapy on Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is a rare but aggressive form of kidney cancer with a poor prognosis. Despite recent advances in therapies for kidney cancers, an effective management strategy for sRCC is uncertain. We evaluated the impact of targeted therapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic sRCC. We identified patients diagnosed with sRCC between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 2014, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with metastatic sRCC were stratified based on the era of diagnosis (before or after the introduction of targeted systemic therapy in 2006) and the status of CN. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Data of 993 patients with metastatic sRCC were available for analysis. The median age was 62 years. Most patients were male (69%), Caucasian (71%), and were diagnosed in the targeted therapy era (83%); 53% of patients underwent CN. CSS and OS of the whole cohort were 5.0 months and 4.0 months, respectively. While the introduction of targeted therapy did not improve outcomes, CN improved CSS and OS in both pre-targeted therapy and targeted therapy era. On multivariable analysis, CN was a predictor of an improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.51, p < 0.0001). Among other factors, older age at diagnosis, higher T stages, and node positivity were associated with worse outcomes. Our results showed that the introduction of targeted therapy did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic sRCC. CN improved survival in both pre-targeted and targeted therapy eras.

Cytotoxic innate lymphoid cells sense cancer cell-expressed interleukin-15 to suppress human and murine malignancies

Malignancy can be suppressed by the immune system. However, the classes of immunosurveillance responses and their mode of tumor sensing remain incompletely understood. Here, we show that although clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was infiltrated by exhaustion-phenotype CD8⁺ T cells that negatively correlated with patient prognosis, chromophobe RCC (chRCC) had abundant infiltration of granzyme A-expressing intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILC1s) that positively associated with patient survival. Interleukin-15 (IL-15) promoted ILC1 granzyme A expression and cytotoxicity, and IL-15 expression in chRCC tumor tissue positively tracked with the ILC1 response. An ILC1 gene signature also predicted survival of a subset of breast cancer patients in association with IL-15 expression. Notably, ILC1s directly interacted with cancer cells, and IL-15 produced by cancer cells supported the expansion and anti-tumor function of ILC1s in a murine breast cancer model. Thus, ILC1 sensing of cancer cell IL-15 defines an immunosurveillance mechanism of epithelial malignancies.

Sintilimab combined with bevacizumab in relapsed/persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (INOVA): an investigator-initiated, multicentre clinical trial-a study protocol of clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) has an abysmal prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 25.3 months because of a low response to chemotherapy. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate after recurrence is 13.2%, with more than two-thirds of the patients dying within a year. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new therapeutic options for OCCC. Based on the characteristic immune-suppressive tumour microenvironment derived from the gene expression profile of OCCC, the combination of immunoantiangiogenesis therapy might have certain efficacy in recurrent/persistent OCCC. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab and bevacizumab in patients who have failed platinum-containing chemotherapy with recurrent or persistent OCCC.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

In this multicentre, single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated clinical trial, 38 patients will be assigned to receive sintilimab 200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The eligibility criteria include histologically diagnosed patients with recurrent or persistent OCCC who have been previously treated with at least one-line platinum-containing chemotherapy; patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 with an expected survival greater than 12 weeks. The exclusion criteria include patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor and patients with contraindications of bevacizumab and sintilimab. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, time to response, duration of response, disease control rate, OS, safety and quality of life. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Research Ethics Commission of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2020-S337). The protocol of this study is registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04735861; Clinicaltrials. gov.

The roaring 2020s: a new decade of systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The genomic and immunologic profiling of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has provided the impetus for advancements in systemic treatments using combination therapy - either with immune check point inhibitor (ICI) + ICI or with ICI + targeted therapy. This approach has been examined in several landmark trials, treating both clear cell (ccRCC) and nonclear cell (nccRCC) histologies. In this review, we highlight systemic therapy advancements made in this new decade, the 2020s.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeting the programmed death receptor 1/PD-L1 pathway has created more tolerable and effective immunotherapy regimens, expanding the applications of ICIs. These new applications, paired with trial data, include ICI monotherapy in nccRCC and adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected, high-risk RCC. In addition, ICI + ICI and ICI + TKI combination therapy have demonstrated oncologic efficacy in advanced ccRCC and sarcomatoid RCC. Similar progress has been noted regarding new targeted therapies. Along the hypoxia inducible factor pathway, belzutifan has received FDA approval in von Hippel-Lindau-associated RCC. In addition, in papillary RCC, agents such as cabozantinib target the MET proto-oncogene pathway and have demonstrated impressive oncologic outcomes.

SUMMARY

The 2020s utilize the molecular profiling of advanced RCC as a scaffold for recent trials in immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Going forward, emphasizing patient-reported outcomes and careful clinical trial construction remain critical to improve systemic therapy in RCC.

Use of immunotherapy in clinical management of genitourinary cancers - a review

Checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 have revolutionized oncologic care delivery, including clinical management of genitourinary malignancies. Despite significant associated improvement in patient outcomes, molecular heterogeneity of tumors, variable tumor engagement with the immune response, and unique patient factors likely account for different clinical responses to immunotherapy agents. A search for predictive biomarkers of treatment response to checkpoint inhibitors is underway and several candidates, although imperfect, have been identified. Multiple checkpoint inhibitors have received approval as monotherapies or in combination with other agents in genitourinary cancers and clinical trial data continues to rapidly evolve. This review summarizes key published evidence involving use of checkpoint inhibitors in management of urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, and penile squamous cell carcinoma. This review aims to help oncology practitioners develop an up-to-date, evidence-based approach to using these agents when managing patients with genitourinary cancers in clinical practice.

Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Genomic Correlates

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in a phase II trial in patients with non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had advanced non-clear-cell renal carcinoma who underwent 0-1 prior systemic therapies excluding prior immune checkpoint inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 40 mg once daily plus nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks or 480 mg once every 4 weeks. Cohort 1 enrolled patients with papillary, unclassified, or translocation-associated RCC; cohort 2 enrolled patients with chromophobe RCC. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1; secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Next-generation sequencing results were correlated with response.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were treated with a median follow-up of 13.1 months. Objective response rate for cohort 1 (n = 40) was 47.5% (95% CI, 31.5 to 63.9), with median progression-free survival of 12.5 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 16.4) and median overall survival of 28 months (95% CI, 16.3 to not evaluable). In cohort 2 (n = 7), no responses were observed; one patient had stable disease > 1 year. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 32% treated patients. Cabozantinib and nivolumab were discontinued because of toxicity in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively. Common mutations included NF2 and FH in cohort 1 and TP53 and PTEN in cohort 2. Objective responses were seen in 10/12 patients with either NF2 or FH mutations.

CONCLUSION

Cabozantinib plus nivolumab showed promising efficacy in most non-clear-cell RCC variants tested in this trial, particularly those with prominent papillary features, whereas treatment effects were limited in chromophobe RCC. Genomic findings in non-clear-cell RCC variants warrant further study as predictors of response.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors and Immunomodulation in Renal Cell Cancers: The Past, Present, and Future

Simple Summary

In their advanced stages, the mainstay of kidney cancer treatment is with medications such as targeted or immune therapies. Breakthroughs in scientific understanding of cancer drug development have led to substantial improvements in life expectancy. Although several combinations are available to choose from, it remains unclear which is best, and furthermore why cancers become resistant to treatment. This review article explores the scientific basis behind drug treatments in kidney cancers, with particular focus on blood vessel development and the immune system, and summarizes the available evidence supporting multi-drug treatments in this context.

Abstract

Angiogenesis inhibitors have been adopted into the standard armamentarium of therapies for advanced-stage renal cell carcinomas (RCC), but more recently, combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated better outcomes. Despite this, the majority of affected patients still eventually experience progressive disease due to therapeutic resistance mechanisms, and there remains a need to develop novel therapeutic strategies. This article will review the synergistic mechanisms behind angiogenesis and immunomodulation in the tumor microenvironment and discuss the pre-clinical and clinical evidence for both clear-cell and non-clear-cell RCC, exploring opportunities for future growth in this exciting area of drug development.

A Systematic Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as active therapies in the management of advanced RCC. While multiple studies have shown clinical activity of ICIs in clear cell histologies, the evidence to support their use in non-clear cell (ncc) subtypes is based on smaller prospective trials and retrospective analyses. Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the clinical outcomes of ICI-based therapies in ncc-subtypes and in tumors with sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and ASCO databases. The key-words “renal cell cancer” and “immune check point inhibitors” and equivalents were used and all original publications between July 2016 and July 2021 were included. Results: We included a total of 14 publications including two clinical trials and 12 case series. The most frequent histologies were papillary (up to 75-100%), unclassified (up to 34%) and chromophobe (up to 28%). ICI monotherapy showed some activity in both 1st and 2nd line with response rates up to 27% . ICI combination regimens yielded better activity than ICI monotherapy but, overall, a heterogeneous efficacy was noted across histologies. Overall, outcomes of ICIs were superior in tumors with sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Conclusion: The observed activity of ICI-based therapies was heterogeneous. Combination regimens, papillary subtype and sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features were associated with higher responses. These findings might help treatment decisions and require further validation.

Systematic Review of Treatment of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Metastatic and unresectable non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma comprises more than a quarter of kidney cancers but does not have standardized treatment. Non-clear renal carcinoma consists of a variety of diverse histologic subtypes, including papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, translocation, and medullary histologies, many of which carry a poor prognosis. Many prospective clinical trials exclude these kidney cancers, and for most clinical trials of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, only a small number of patients are enrolled. Objective: To perform a systematic review of recently published and currently enrolling prospective clinical trials for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed and MEDLINE (Ovid) was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines to identify recent prospective clinical trials in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. To ensure a thorough search, terms not only included non-clear cell renal carcinoma but also molecular subtypes. A review of currently enrolling clinical trials was conducted on Clinicaltrials.gov and the EU Clinical Trials Register as well. Results: A total of 33 prospective clinical trials with published results and 10 currently enrolling clinicals trials were identified. About half (48.5%) of these studies were reported in 2020 or 2021, and 36.4% were in the first-line setting. Treatments investigated in these trials included mTOR inhibitors, VEGF- and MET-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combinatorial strategies. Outcomes from these data revealed a wide range of response rate and progression free survival, favoring TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors -based combination regimens. Conclusions: Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the landscape of treatment for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Combination regimens may provide even further clinical benefit and warrant further investigation in larger, randomized prospective clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954) is a multicohort, phase 3b/4 clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in predominantly US community-based patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clinical features mostly excluded from phase 3 trials. We report safety and efficacy results from the advanced non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) cohort of CheckMate 920.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic nccRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and any International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk received up to four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for ≤2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS; both investigator-assessed), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR), all using RECIST V.1.1. Overall survival (OS) was exploratory.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with nccRCC (unclassified histology, 42.3%; papillary, 34.6%; chromophobe, 13.5%; translocation-associated, 3.8%; collecting duct, 3.8%; renal medullary, 1.9%) received treatment. With 24.1 months minimum study follow-up, median duration of therapy (range) was 3.5 (0.0-25.8) months for nivolumab and 2.1 (0.0-3.9) months for ipilimumab. Median (range) number of doses received was 4.5 (1-28) for nivolumab and 4.0 (1-4) for ipilimumab. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated AEs were diarrhea/colitis (7.7%), rash (5.8%), nephritis and renal dysfunction (3.8%), hepatitis (1.9%), adrenal insufficiency (1.9%), and hypophysitis (1.9%). No grade 5 immune-mediated AEs occurred. ORR (n=46) was 19.6% (95% CI 9.4 to 33.9). Two patients achieved complete response (papillary, n=1; unclassified, n=1), seven achieved partial response (papillary, n=4; unclassified, n=3), and 17 had stable disease. Median TTR was 2.8 (range 2.1-14.8) months. Median DOR was not reached (range 0.0+-27.8+); eight of nine responders remain without reported progression. Median PFS (n=52) was 3.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 4.6) months. Median OS (n=52) was 21.2 (95% CI 16.6 to not estimable) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced nccRCC showed no new safety signals and encouraging antitumor activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02982954.