A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Current Treatment Options: Uterine Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

The cornerstone of treatment for uterine sarcoma, regardless of histologic type, remains en bloc surgical resection with total hysterectomy. In the case of incidental diagnosis during another procedure, such as myomectomy, where a hysterectomy was not performed initially, completion hysterectomy or cervical remnant removal is recommended. The completion of additional surgical procedures, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy, remains nuanced. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy remains controversial in the setting of most subtypes of uterine sarcoma, except in the case of hormone-receptor positivity, such as in low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, where it is indicated as part of definitive surgical treatment. In the absence of apparent nodal involvement, we do not recommend performing universal lymphadenectomy for patients with sarcoma. We recommend systemic therapy for patients with extra-uterine or advanced stage disease, high-grade histology, and recurrence. The most active chemotherapy regimens for advanced, high-grade disease remain doxorubicin or gemcitabine and docetaxol combination therapy. A notable exception is low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, where we recommend anti-hormonal therapy in the front-line setting. Radiation therapy is reserved for selected cases where it can aid in palliating symptoms.

Prognostic factors, oncological treatment and outcomes of uterine sarcoma: 10 years' clinical experience from a tertiary care center in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcoma is an uncommon aggressive malignancy. Optimal management and prognostic factors have yet to be well recognized due to their rarity and various histological subtypes. This study aims to investigate these patients' prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma and treated from January 2010 to December 2019 in a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan. The data were analyzed using STATA software and stratified on the histological subtype. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CI were estimated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients, 16(40%) had uterine leiomyosarcoma (u-LMS), 10(25%) had high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), 8(20%) had low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) and 6(15%) had other histological subtypes. The median age of all patients was 49 (40-55.5). Thirty-seven (92.5%) patients underwent primary surgical resection, and 24 (60%) patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. The survival plots showed the overall population's DFS of 64 months and the OS of 88 months (p-value = 0.001). The median DFS in all patients was 12 months, and the median OS was 14 months (p-value = 0.001). A small but significant DFS benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, 13.5 versus 11 months (p-value = 0.001). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that large tumor size and advanced FIGO stage were substantial factors associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

Uterine sarcomas are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. Multiple factors, including tumor size, mitotic count, stage of the disease, and myometrial invasion, impact survival outcomes. Adjuvant treatment may decrease the recurrence rate and improve DFS but do not affect OS.

Uterine leiomyosarcomas harboring MAP2K4 gene amplification are sensitive in vivo to PLX8725, a novel MAP2K4 inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Uterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS) are rare, highly aggressive tumors. Up to 30% of uLMS may harbor gain of function (GOF) in the MAP2K4 gene, important for tumor cell proliferation, differentiation and metastasis. We investigated the in vivo activity of a novel MAP2K4 inhibitor, PLX8725, against uLMS harboring MAP2K4 gene-amplification.

METHODS

Two fully characterized uLMS (i.e., LEY-11 and LEY-16) were grafted into female CB-17/SCID mice. Treatments with control vehicle or PLX8725 (50 mg/kg) were given via oral gavage daily on weekdays for up to 60 days. Tumor volume differences were calculated with two-way ANOVA. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and mechanistic studies of PLX8725 in uLMS PDX models were also performed.

RESULTS

Both uLMS tumors evaluated demonstrated GOF in MAP2K4 (i.e., 3 CNV in both LEY-11 and LEY-16). Tumor growth inhibition was significantly greater in both PDX LEY-11 and PDX LEY-16 treated with PLX8725 when compared to controls (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was also significantly longer in both PDX LEY-11 (p = 0.0047) and PDX LEY-16 (p = 0.0058) treatment cohorts when compared to controls. PLX8725 oral treatment was well tolerated, and PK studies demonstrated that oral PLX8725 gives extended exposure in mice. Ex vivo tumor samples after PLX8725 exposure decreased phosphorylated-ATR, JNK and p38, and increased expression of apoptotic molecules on western blot.

CONCLUSION

PLX8725 demonstrates promising in vivo activity against PDX models of uLMS harboring GOF alterations in the MAP2K4 gene with tolerable toxicity. Phase I trials of PLX8725 in advanced, recurrent, chemotherapy-resistant uLMS patients are warranted.

Treatment strategies in patients with gynecological sarcoma: Results of the prospective intergroup real-world registry for gynecological sarcoma in Germany (REGSA-NOGGO RU1)

OBJECTIVE

Gynecological sarcomas account for 3% of all gynecological malignancies and are associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of gynecological sarcomas there is still no consensus on optimal therapeutic strategies. This study's objective was to describe the treatment strategies used in patients with gynecological sarcomas in the primary course of disease.

METHODS

The German prospective registry for gynecological sarcoma (REGSA) is the largest registry for gynecological sarcomas in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Primary inclusion criteria for REGSA are histological diagnosis of sarcoma of the female genital tract, sarcoma of the breast or uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). We evaluated data of the REGSA registry on therapeutic strategies used for primary treatment from August 2015 to February 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 723 patients from 120 centers were included. Data on therapeutic strategies for primary treatment were available in 605 cases. Overall, 580 (95.9%) patients underwent primary surgery, 472 (81.4%) of whom underwent only hysterectomy. Morcellation was reported in 11.4% (n=54) of all hysterectomies. A total of 42.8% (n=202) had no further surgical interventions, whereas an additional salpingo-ophorectomy was performed in 54% (n=255) of patients. An additional lymphadenectomy was performed in 12.7% (n=60), an omentectomy in 9.5% (n=45) and intestinal resection in 6.1% (n=29) of all patients. Among 448 patients with available information, 21.4% (n=96) received chemo- or targeted therapies, more commonly as single-agent treatment than as drug combinations. Information about anti-hormonal treatment was available for 423 patients, among which 42 (9.9%) received anti-hormonal treatment, 23 (54.8%) of whom with low-grade endometrial stroma sarcomas. For radiotherapy, data of 437 patients were available, among which 29 (6.6%) patients underwent radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that treatment of patients with gynecologic sarcomas is heterogeneous. Further trials are needed along with more information on treatment modalities, therapy response and patient-reported outcomes to implement new treatment strategies.

Elimusertib (BAY1895344), a novel ATR inhibitor, demonstrates in vivo activity in ATRX mutated models of uterine leiomyosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy. Recent data suggest 50% of uLMS may harbor alterations in the ATRX gene and such mutations may confer sensitivity to ataxia-telangiectasia-and-Rad3-related (ATR) kinase inhibitors. We sought to investigate the in vivo activity of Elimusertib (BAY1895344), a novel ATR-inhibitor, against ATRX-mutated uLMS patient-derived xenografts (PDXs).

METHODS

Two fully characterized uLMS (i.e., LEY-11 and LEY-16) were grafted into female CB-17/SCID mice. Treatments with control vehicle or BAY1895344 (20 mg/kg dosed twice daily 3 days on 4 days off) were given via oral gavage and tumor measurements as well as weights obtained twice weekly. Tumor volume differences were calculated with a two-way ANOVA. Mechanistic studies were performed ex vivo using BAY1895344 treated uLMS tumor samples by western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Both PDX LEY-11 and PDX LEY-16 harboring ATRX gene mutations demonstrated an aggressive behavior in vivo (i.e., control mice were euthanized on average at day 12.5 for PDX LEY-11 and at day 33 for PDX LEY-16). In both tumor models BAY1895344 20 mg/kg dosed with an intermittent oral schedule was able to induce significant growth inhibition compared to vehicle control treatment (p < 0.001 for both LEY-11 and LEY-16) and prolong median overall survival [PDX LEY-11 (12.5 vs. 42 days, p < 0.001) and PDX LEY-16 (33 vs. 60 days, p < 0.001)]. There were not significant changes in weight between treatment and controls. By western blot assays BAY1895344 exposure decreased phosphorylated-ATR and increased expression of apoptotic molecules in LMS PDXs.

CONCLUSIONS

BAY1895344 demonstrates promising in vivo activity against biologically aggressive PDX models of uLMS harboring ATRX mutations, with no significant toxicity. Clinical trials of BAY1895344 in uLMS patients are warranted.

Management of pelvic sarcoma

Pelvic sarcomas are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors divided into two groups: soft tissue sarcomas and bone sarcomas. Soft tissue sarcomas of the pelvis include most commonly liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and solitary fibrous tumors. Bone sarcomas of the pelvis most commonly include osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Multidisciplinary treatment at a center experienced in the treatment of sarcoma is essential. Management is dictated by histologic type and grade. Surgical resection with wide margins is the cornerstone of treatment for pelvic sarcomas, although this is often challenging due to anatomic constraints of the pelvis. Multimodal treatment is critical due to the high risk of local recurrence in the pelvis.

Utilization and outcomes of adjuvant therapy for stage II and III uterine leiomyosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The optimal adjuvant therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) remains uncertain. We analyzed the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for stage II and III uLMS and explored the association between use of adjuvant therapy and survival.

METHODS

Patients with stage II or III uLMS treated from 2004 to 2016 and recorded in the National Cancer Database were identified. Multivariable regression models were fit to estimate predictors of use of either adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy. To analyze the impact of chemotherapy on all-cause mortality, an inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) propensity score method was used to account for measured confounders, and the receipt of radiation therapy was adjusted in the outcome model. The process was repeated to analyze the impact of radiation therapy on all-cause mortality by using an IPTW propensity score method and adjusting for the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 890 patients were identified. Adjuvant chemotherapy use increased from 62.2% in 2010 to 70.4% in 2016, whereas radiation usage decreased from 26.7% in 2010 to 10.4% in 2016. Patients with stage III (vs. stage II) disease were less likely to receive radiation therapy. After propensity score weighting, chemotherapy was associated with a 30% decreased risk of all-cause mortality in stage III patients (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45-0.98) but had no effect on mortality for stage II patients (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.20). Radiation therapy was associated with a 26% decreased risk of mortality for stage II tumors (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99) and a 57% decrease in mortality for stage III disease (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with stage II-III uLMS, use of chemotherapy is increasing while use of radiation therapy is decreasing. Radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in both stage II and III disease, while there was no association between use of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage II patients.

Effect of Tumor Targeted-Anthracycline Nanomedicine, HPMA Copolymer-Conjugated Pirarubicin (P-THP) against Gynecological Malignancies

Anthracyclines are important for the treatment of gynecological malignancies, but their effects are modest, and one of the major reasons is the lack of a tumor-targeting property. To overcome this drawback, a poly (hydroxypropyl meta-acrylamide) conjugated with tetrahydropyraryl doxorubicin (P-THP) has been developed, which exhibits a highly tumor-specific accumulation owing to the enhanced permeability and retention effect. The effect of P-THP has been confirmed by using various cell lines and solid tumor models, while its effect on gynecological malignancies have not been investigated. In this regard, human uterine sarcoma cell line with metastatic potential MEA-SA C9 high, epithelial ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and its cisplatin-resistant line A2780cis, and DOX-resistant line A2780ADR were used in this study, and the therapeutic effect as well as the safety profiles of P-THP were investigated compared to native THP, cisplatin, and paclitaxel, which are commonly used for gynecological malignancies, both in vitro and in vivo. Similar to native THP, a dose-dependent toxicity of P-THP was identified in all cell lines. Moreover, the IC50 values in the 3 h following P-THP were 1.5–10 times higher than those at 72 h, though the intracellular uptake of P-THP in all cells were 2–10-fold less than THP. In vivo studies using xenograft tumor models revealed that P-THP significantly suppressed the MES-SA C9 high, A2780, and A2780cis tumor growth at the dose of 15 mg/kg (THP equivalent), which is three times above the maximal tolerance dose of native THP, while no body weight loss or acute death occurred. However, in A2780ADR cells and the xenograft model, no significant difference in the therapeutic effect was observed between THP and P-THP, suggesting that P-THP exhibits its effect depending on the release of the active free THP in tumor tissues, and thus the internalization into tumor cells. These findings indicates that P-THP has the potential as a therapeutic for gynecological malignancies to improve the therapeutic outcomes and survival rates of patients, even in refractory patients.

Uterine Sarcomas: How to Navigate an Ever-Growing List of Subtypes

Uterine sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors that are aggressive cancers. The rarity of these tumors, and consequently limited prospective data, has made surgical management of uterine sarcomas challenging. One major obstacle in the management of uterine sarcomas is establishing the diagnosis prior to surgery, which is crucial for appropriate intraoperative management. This paper serves to review aspects of surgical management of uterine sarcomas that remain unanswered. Distinguishing common benign myomas from rare uterine sarcomas is important for operative planning and subspecialty care because benign myomas are frequently managed with minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy, whereas the mainstay of management of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy without specimen fragmentation. Preoperative clinical presentation, serum studies, imaging, and histologic examination all have limitations in establishing a preoperative diagnosis. In addition, patients are often of reproductive age and desire fertility preservation. Although surgery remains the cornerstone for management, high-quality data guiding best practices are sparse. Morcellation should be avoided. Expert pathologic review, imaging to assess for metastatic disease, and consideration of hormone receptor testing are advisable. Recent data have further informed surgical approach and fertility preservation in early-stage disease, but controversy remains. Despite substantial advancement in the medical management of uterine sarcomas, surgical management of uterine sarcomas remain challenging. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to guide fertility preservation surgery options, both local resection and ovarian preservation, further in young women. Development of novel methods to differentiate between benign and malignant uterine masses is needed.

Retrospective analysis of adjuvant treatment for localized, operable uterine leiomyosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is no standard adjuvant treatment protocol for localized uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) as clinical trials to address this question have been retrospective, underpowered, or undermined by slow accrual rates. The aim of this study is to determine the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for uLMS.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of localized uLMS patients who had underwent adjuvant therapy after upfront surgery between 2000 and 2020. The cases were blinded for review. We evaluated the influence of various clinical characteristics and different types of adjuvant therapies on specific outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (median age: 50 years) were included for analysis. Forty of 68 (58.8%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy and 25 patients (38.6%) did not receive any adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up time of 43.3 months, 45 patients (66.1%) had relapsed disease. The median disease-free survival (mDFS) for all patients was 23.1 months. Patients who received any adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation) trended toward a longer mDFS compared with those who did not receive any adjuvant therapy (29.7 vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.26). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone had a longer, but nonstatistically significant mDFS compared with those who did not receive any adjuvant treatment (22.2 vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.18). Additionally, univariate analysis found that tumor size large than 10 cm, and a mitotic rate >10/10hpf were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Though DFS was more favorable among those who received adjuvant therapy, it was not statistically significant, and thus based on this data adjuvant therapy for resected uLMS is still in question.

Comparison of Different Systemic Therapeutic Regimes in Resectable Soft-Tissue Sarcoma-Results of a Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

This analysis was conducted to compare different systemic treatment options in the therapy of localized and resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. We tested these in a network against the current standard of resection with or without radiotherapy, which allowed direct and indirect comparisons. Chemotherapy given after the local therapy and chemotherapy added to regional hyperthermia before the operation were associated with a longer survival and likeliness of being disease free and alive. Chemotherapy tailored to the specific subtype of sarcoma did not improve outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be more helpful in male rather than female patients.

Abstract

Background: The standard treatment of high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma consists of surgical resection followed by risk-adapted radiation therapy. Further treatment options that may improve local and systemic tumor control, including chemotherapy, are not well established. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, different systemic approaches as well as their application at different time points have been attempted. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials in the treatment of localized, resectable high-risk adult soft-tissue sarcoma comparing different treatment modalities according to the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted published hazard ratios and number of events for the endpoints overall and disease-free survival (OS; DFS) as well as local and distant recurrence-free interval (LRFI; DRFI). The different modalities were compared in a network meta-analysis against the defined standard treatment surgery ± radiotherapy using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Results: The literature search identified 25 trials including 3453 patients. Five different treatment modalities were compared in the network meta-analysis. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (HR = 0.86; CI-95%: 0.75–0.97; p = 0.017). Likewise, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (naCTx + HTx) also led to superior OS (HR = 0.45; CI-95%: 0.20–1.00; p = 0.049). Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (naCTx) and perioperative chemotherapy (periCTx) did not improve OS (HR = 0.61; CI-95%: 0.29–1.29; p = 0.195 and HR = 0.66; CI-95%: 0.30–1.48; p = 0.317, respectively). Histology-tailored chemotherapy (htCTx) also did not improve survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.45–2.61; p = 0.868). The network analysis of DFS, LRFI, and DRFI revealed a similar pattern between the different treatment regimens. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS, LRFI, and DRFI compared to surgery ± radiotherapy. In direct comparison, this advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to male patients (HR = 0.78; CI-95%: 0.65–0.92; p = 0.004) with no effect for female patients (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.90–1.29; p = 0.410). Conclusions: Standardized chemotherapy in high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma appears to be of added value irrespective of timing. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be restricted to male patients. The addition of regional hyperthermia to neodjuvant chemotherapy achieved the best effect sizes and might warrant further investigation.

Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival when added to surgery and chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

BACKGROUND

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) confers a high recurrence risk following surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) is typically administered in all stages. The benefit of radiation therapy (RT) in UCS, when added to adjuvant CHT, is unknown. We sought to analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to ascertain whether RT improves overall survival (OS) when added to surgery and CHT for UCS.

METHODS

SEER 18 Custom Data registries (Nov 2018 submission) were queried for uterine (ICD10 C54.1-9, C55.9) carcinosarcoma (ICD-0-3 8980-3). Patients with stage I-III UCS who underwent surgery and CHT ± RT were analyzed with univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to account for indication bias. Furthermore, conditional landmark analysis (minimum three-month follow-up) was performed to minimize immortal time bias.

RESULTS

All 1541 patients (1988-2016) underwent surgery and CHT and 54% received RT. On UVA, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 41 to 87 months and 43-55%, respectively (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.77) (p < 0.001). After IPTW adjustment, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 46 to 65 months and 46-53%, respectively (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87) (p < 0.001). The benefit of RT remained on unadjusted and adjusted MVA and conditional landmark analysis.

CONCLUSION

In stage I-III UCS treated with surgery and CHT, receipt of RT is associated with OS benefit. Further prospective data are needed to investigate the RT's benefit in UCS.

Uterine carcinosarcomas: From pathology to practice

OBJECTIVE

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare but aggressive cancer. In early-stage disease data guiding treatment is sparse. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings from the 2019 NRG oncology group summer symposium meeting as well as a review of the current literature, with a particular focus on molecular targets, ongoing clinical trials, and treatment of early and advanced/recurrent disease.

METHODS

A combination of expert presentations and an extensive literature search was undertaken to summarize the literature in this review. MEDLINE was queried for peer-reviewed publications on UCS. This search was not limited by year or study design, but was limited to English language publications. ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for ongoing trials in UCS.

RESULTS

UCS is a rare cancer that is biphasic, with the carcinomatous component driving its aggressive nature. Level 3 evidence regarding early stage disease is lacking, but retrospective data suggests adjuvant therapy is warranted. The recent results of GOG 261 have contributed valuable information towards treatment strategy, including use of paclitaxel and carboplatin for UCS. Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate new targeted agents in UCS.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing endometrial cancer clinical trials now include UCS patients. In combination with advances in molecular profiling, this will provide patients with UCS improved therapeutic options. Until that time, surgical resection and traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy remains standard of care.

Adult Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcomas: Assessing Outcomes Associated with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Use in the National Cancer Database

Purpose

Practice patterns for treatment of localized adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) remain quite variable given its rarity. Current national guidelines recommend management similar to that of other high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS), which include surgery with perioperative radiation (RT) with or without chemotherapy. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we assessed practice patterns and overall outcomes of patients with localized PRMS. Patients and Methods. Patients with stage II/III PRMS treated with surgical resection from 2004 to 2015 were identified from the NCDB. Predictors of RT and chemotherapy use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The association of radiation and chemotherapy status on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

Of 243 total patients, RT and chemotherapy were not uniformly utilized, with 44% receiving chemotherapy and in those who did not undergo amputation 62% receiving RT. In those who did not undergo amputation, RT was associated with improved survival on both univariate (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.001), corresponding to greater 5-year overall survival (59% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). Chemotherapy was associated with a higher rate of 5-year overall survival (63% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). However, the survival benefit of chemotherapy did not reach statistical significance on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.03, P=0.064). Notable predictors of omission of RT included female gender (OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < 0.01) and age ≥ 70 (OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.00, P=0.05). Correspondingly, factors associated with omission of chemotherapy included age ≥70 (OR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

A significant proportion of patients with localized adult PRMS are not receiving RT. Likewise, use of chemotherapy was heterogeneous. Our findings note potential benefits and underutilization of RT, for which further investigation is warranted.

Effect of anthracyclines/ifosfamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma: a conventional and network Meta-analysis

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of anthracyclines/ifosfamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and provide a relative ranking of regimens for STS. We pooled the hazard ratios of overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) by conventional meta-analysis to appraise whether adjuvant chemotherapy benefits STS and performed a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian model to establish the relative ranking of regimens. Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratios were 0.68 (95%CI: 0.53-0.86) and 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.83) for OS and RFS, respectively. Doxorubicin was indicated as best regimen to benefit OS (probability: 30.2%), while cyclophosphamide + vincristine + doxorubicin + dactinomycin was indicated as the best regimen for RFS (probability: 37.1%). This meta-analysis confirms the positive effect of anthracyclines/ifosfamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy in STS for both OS and RFS.

Molecular prognostication of uterine smooth muscle neoplasms: From CGH array to CINSARC signature and beyond

Uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma are located at the ends of the spectrum of smooth muscle lesions. Leiomyosarcoma belongs to the complex genomic sarcomas characterized by complex karyotypes. In contrast, leiomyoma, has a low level of chromosomal complexity. The analysis of genomic profiles of uterine smooth muscle tumors shows that genomic complexity, which is an expression of chromosomal instability, correlates with the metastatic potential and malignity of tumors: the more genetically complex a smooth muscle tumor is, the more malignant is its progression. In uterine tumors with uncertain malignant potential, the assessment of genomic index by CGH array, that is, counting the genomic complexity of a tumor, allows tumors with a risk of recurrence such as leiomyosarcomas to be distinguished from benign tumors like leiomyomas. The prognosis of leiomyosarcoma is poor and the most powerful prognostic factor so far is stage, as the histologic grade is not informative. In the quest to find efficient molecular prognostic factors, the transcriptomic signature CINSARC Nanocind, a mirror of chromosomic complexity and instability, outperforms stage, in both overall and recurrence-free survival. Genomic index and the CINSARC signature will contribute to improving diagnoses, therapeutic strategies, and randomization in future clinical trials. The biological understanding of the links between the CINSARC signature and metastatic mechanisms may lead to the development of new drugs. Furthermore, ctDNA is a promising new technique to detect residual disease and early recurrence.

Italian consensus conference on management of uterine sarcomas on behalf of S.I.G.O. (Societa' italiana di Ginecologia E Ostetricia)

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcomas are very rare tumours with different histotypes, molecular features and clinical outcomes; therefore, it is difficult to carry out prospective clinical trials, and this often results in heterogeneous management of patients in the clinical practice.

AIM

We planned to set up an Italian consensus conference on these diseases in order to provide recommendations on treatments and quality of care in our country.

RESULTS

Early-stage uterine sarcomas are managed by hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy according to menopausal status and histology; lymphadenectomy is not indicated in patients without bulky nodes, and morcellation must be avoided. The postoperative management is represented by observation, even though chemotherapy can be considered in some high-risk patients. In early-stage low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth, hormonal adjuvant treatment can be offered based on hormone receptor expression. In selected cases, external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy can be considered to increase local control only. Patients with advanced disease involving the abdomen can be offered primary chemotherapy (or hormonal therapy in the case of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma without sarcomatous overgrowth), even if potentially resectable in the absence of residual disease in order to test the chemosensitivity (or hormonosensitivity); debulking surgery can be considered in patients with clinical and radiological response. Chemotherapy is based on anthracyclines ± ifosfamide or dacarbazine. Palliative radiotherapy can be offered for symptom control, and stereotactic radiotherapy can be used for up to five isolated metastatic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of uterine sarcoma should be centralised at referral centres and managed in a multidisciplinary setting.

Impact of Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting of Early Stage Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis

Background: Although the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) appears to be increasing over the past few years, several clinical trials and previous meta-analyses failed to determine whether AC could improve clinical outcomes in uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare AC (with or without radiotherapy) versus observation (obs) after primary surgery in early stage uLMS. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) were retrieved. Outcomes of interest were as follows: distant recurrence rate, locoregional recurrence rate and overall recurrence rate. Results about distant recurrence rate, locoregional recurrence rate and overall recurrence rate were compared by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); ORs were combined with Mantel–Haenszel method. Results: Nine studies were included in the analysis, involving 545 patients (AC: 252, obs: 293). Compared with obs, AC did not reduce locoregional and distant recurrence rate, with a pooled OR of 1.36 and 0.63, respectively. Similarly, administration of AC did not decrease overall recurrence rate in comparison to obs. Conclusion: According to our results, AC (with or without radiotherapy) did not decrease recurrence rate in early stage uLMS; thus, the role of AC in this setting remains unclear.

Molecular variations in uterine carcinosarcomas identify therapeutic opportunities

OBJECTIVE

To perform comprehensive genomic profiling on a large cohort of patients with uterine carcinosarcomas to identify potential therapeutic targets.

METHODS

Molecular profiling was conducted on 168 retrospectively de-identified patients with uterine carcinosarcomas using the Caris Life Sciences platform. Specimens were evaluated for aberrations in protein expression by immunohistochemistry, DNA sequence mutation using a 592-gene next generation sequencing panel, copy number amplification using next generation sequencing or in situ hybridization, and fusion events using NextGen RNA sequencing. Tumor mutational load and microsatellite instability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 168 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma; median age of the cohort was 67 years. The most common mutations were observed in the following genes: TP53 (86%), PIK3CA (34%), FBXW7 (23%), PTEN (18%), KRAS (16%), PPP2R1A (10%). Tumor mutational load was low to moderate in most cases (50% and 45%, respectively). HER2/neu (ERBB2) was amplified in 9% of tumors. Immunohistochemistry protein expression was elevated in TOP2A (95%), TS (80%), PTEN (76%), and TUBB3 (66%). Mismatch repair deficiency was rare (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple somatic mutations and copy number alterations in genes that are therapeutic targets were identified in half of cases. Uterine carcinosarcomas represent an aggressive histology with limited treatment options and poor outcomes, and clinical trials are needed to validate new therapeutic targets.

Characterizing the efficacy and trends of adjuvant therapy versus observation in women with early stage (uterine confined) leiomyosarcoma: a National Cancer Database study

Objective

The utility of adjuvant therapy for women with uterine confined leiomyosarcoma remains uncertain. We sought to identify trends, analyze efficacy, and assess survival impact of adjuvant therapy in this patients.

Methods

We performed an observational cohort study of 1030 women with early stage leiomyosarcoma from the 2008–2014 National Cancer Database. Multi-nominal logistic regression was used to identify trends in receipt of adjuvant treatment. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival.

Results

There were 547 who (53.1%) received observation, 79 (7.7%) received radiation alone, 340 (33.0%) received chemotherapy alone, and 64 (6.2%) received chemoradiation. Patients were more likely to be observed if tumor size was <5 cm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.95–0.99; p=0.017) and less likely to be observed if lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was present (HR=0.60; 95% CI=0.41–0.89; p=0.010). Patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they were younger (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.65–0.94; p=0.010) and if they had LVSI (HR=1.47; 95% CI=1.01–2.16; p=0.040). There was an independent association between older age, tumor size >5 cm, and LVSI with worsened survival, with the strongest predictor of mortality being the presence of LVSI. With a median survival of 61.9 months, there was no difference in estimated overall survival at 1 and 3 years based on receipt of adjuvant treatment as compared to observation (p=0.500).

Conclusion

Although women with uterine confined leiomyosarcoma experience high recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes, adjuvant treatment does not appear to confer a survival benefit.

Current status of the adjuvant therapy in uterine sarcoma: A literature review

Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare mesenchymal tumours accounting approximately for 3%–7% of all uterine cancers. Histologically, US are classified into mesenchymal tumours or mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumours. The group of mesenchymal tumours includes uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS, 65% of cases), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS, 21%) – traditionally divided into low grade (LG-ESS) and high grade–undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (5%) and other rare subtypes such as alveolar or embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Despite the fact that several drugs demonstrated clinical activity in advanced or metastatic settings, the role of postoperative therapy in US remains controversial. In this review, we have summarised the current state of the art, including the chief trials on adjuvant treatment modalities in US, especially focusing on uLMS, LG-ESS and other rare histotypes.

Treatment of Uterine Sarcoma at the University of Florence from 1980-2001

Purpose

To correlate the treatment used in uterine sarcoma with outcome. The prognostic importance of pathology, clinical parameters and treatment are analyzed.

Patients and methods

Forty patients (median age, 59 years; range, 37-85) with histologically verified uterine sarcoma were identified from a database compiled at the University of Florence from 1980 to 2001. Patients were followed for a median of 54 months (range, 3 months to 10 years). Twenty-four patients had leiomyosarcoma, 12 patients had mixed mullerian tumors, and 3 patients had endometrial stromal sarcoma. Stage I, II, III and IV tumors were identified in 22, 2, 9 and 7 patients, respectively. High, intermediate, low and unspecified grade sarcoma occurred in 9, 4, 5 and 22 patients, respectively.

Results

At the time of analysis, 58% of patients had died and 42% were alive, with a median survival of 2 years from the initial diagnosis. Cause-specific survival for the entire group was 81%, 41% and 25% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. In our series, univariate analysis for cause-specific survival did not demonstrate statistical significance for histology, grade, stage or age. There appeared to be a significant impact for postoperative radiotherapy in reducing local recurrence with a total dose higher than 50 Gy.

Conclusions

Our data favor treatment for uterine sarcoma with radical surgery plus irradiation, even in elderly patients.

Uterine sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas comprise a small percentage of uterine malignancies. The most common uterine sarcoma is leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Early stage uterine LMS is curable with complete hysterectomy with removal of an intact uterus. Patients with metastatic disease may achieve tumor responses with improvements in quality of life, but long-term remissions are rare. In this review article, I outline adjuvant therapies for early stage resected uterine LMS, as well as treatment of metastatic disease.

Uterine Carcinosarcomas

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare and aggressive variant of endometrial cancer, distinguished by its containment of both epithelial and sarcomatous elements. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathologic classification and staging of UCS, along with the typical findings seen on different imaging modalities. Prognosis and therapies will also be discussed.

Localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and localized undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a retrospective series of the French Sarcoma Group

OBJECTIVE

High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas are associated with a very poor prognosis. Although large surgical resection is the standard of care, the optimal adjuvant strategy remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (stages I-III) treated in 10 French Sarcoma Group centers was conducted.

RESULTS

39 patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas treated from 2008 to 2016 were included. 24/39 patients (61.5%) were stage I at diagnosis. 38/39 patients underwent surgical resection, with total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy completed in 26/38 (68%). Surgeries were mostly resection complete (R0, 23/38, 60%) and microscopically incomplete resection (R1, 6/38, 16%). 22 patients (58%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy (including brachytherapy in 11 cases), and 11 (29%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 2.6-112), 17/39 patients were alive and 21/39 (54%) had relapsed (9 local relapses and 16 metastases). The 3 year and 5 year overall survival rates were 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively, and 3 year and 5 year disease free survival rates were 42.7% and 16.0%, respectively. Median overall survival and disease free survival were 32.7 (95% CI 16.3-49.1) and 23 (4.4-41.6) months, respectively. Medians were, respectively, 46.7 months and 39.0 months among those who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 41.0 months and 10.3 months for those who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.012) and disease free survival (P=0.036). Chemotherapy, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I-II stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status 0 correlated with improved overall survival (P=0.034, P=0.002, P=0.006), and absence of vascular invasion (P=0.014) was associated with better disease free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard treatment of primary localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas is total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. The current study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy appear to improve overall survival. A prospective large study is warranted to validate this therapeutic management.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Trends and Factors Impacting Usage

Objectives

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with localized uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) remains unclear due to a lack of randomized studies and data only from small retrospective series to rely on. We sought to identify factors associated with the administration of chemotherapy and to determine the trends in the usage of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with nonmetastatic uterine LMS.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic uterine LMS between 2004 and 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multiple regression was used to determine factors with a significant impact on patient receipt of chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier curves and the Cox model were used to determine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS).

Results

2,732 uterine LMS patients were identified. Patients older than 65 were less likely to receive chemotherapy than their younger counterparts. Patients with stage I or stage II cancer were less likely to receive chemotherapy, whereas individuals with positive regional lymph nodes and those who had received radiation were more likely. In this cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy had no significant impact on OS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90–1.22; P=0.5768). However, administration of chemotherapy significantly increased from 2004 to 2014 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Expected tumor characteristics such as higher stage of tumor were associated with receipt of chemotherapy. Although adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated no benefit over observation on OS in patients with nonmetastatic LMS, the number of patients being treated with chemotherapy continued to increase from 2004 to 2014.

A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)

Objective

Up to 87% of uterine leiomyosarcomas have estrogen receptor positivity. There are no effective adjuvant therapies for LMS. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of letrozole in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The primary endpoint of this study was a reduction in the recurrence rate for patients with this disease.

Methods

We performed a randomized, open-label, phase II study of letrozole (experimental arm) administered orally on a daily basis vs. observation (control) in patients with newly diagnosed early stage uLMS. Patient enrollment was to be open to any individual with newly diagnosed uLMS seen in the Gynecologic Oncology Center at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Hormone receptor positivity using CLIA approved lab testing was an eligibility requirement. No prior therapy was allowed.

Results

Nine patients were randomized. Four patients were in the experimental arm and five patients were in the observation arm. No patients had prior therapy. The median duration of protocol treatment was 43.9 months (range, 6.5–70.2). The median PFS for the experimental arm was not reached (NR) compared to 17.3 months. The percent progression free at 12 and 24 months was 100% for patients receiving letrozole compared to 80% at 12 months and 40% at 24 months for patients in the observation arm.

Conclusions

While no definitive conclusions can be made due to early study closure, these early observations warrant further investigation. We desperately need an effective adjuvant therapy for women with early stage uLMS.

•

Adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) represents an unmet medical need.

•

We hypothesized that hormonal manipulation can positively impact survival in this group of patients.

•

Results suggest aromatase inhibitor therapy may be an active agent in early stage uterine leiomyosarcoma.

•

Low accrual due to rare disease type resulted in early study closure.

Uterine leiomyosarcoma: A review of the literature and update on management options

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common type of uterine sarcoma. It is an extremely aggressive malignancy associated with a poor overall prognosis. Women affected may vary in age, but are most often diagnosed in their perimenopausal years. Presenting symptoms may be vague and mimic other benign uterine conditions. Preoperative diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma is difficult and often only made at time of surgical resection. These rare mesenchymal tumors are characterized by cytologic atypia, a high mitotic index, and tumor necrosis on histologic inspection. Management of early stage disease entails hysterectomy and complete surgical resection of gross tumor, though routine oophorectomy or lymph node dissection do not appear to confer much clinical benefit. Adjuvant therapy for early stage disease remains controversial as multiple clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit on overall survival. Recently, progress has been made in regards to therapy for advanced and recurrent disease. Novel chemotherapeutics, targeted therapies such as olaratumab and pazopanib, and new immunotherapies such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated promise in these previously difficult drug-resistant patients. In this article, we provide a detailed review of uterine leiomyosarcoma including epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and pathologic characteristics. We then go on detail management strategies, including options for adjuvant therapy, and highlight new and developing regimens in the field.

Systemic Treatment of Metastatic/Recurrent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Changing Paradigm

The treatment of metastatic and recurrent uterine leoimyosarcoma (uLMS) has evolved rapidly in the past several years. Leoimyosarcoma is extremely aggressive and responds poorly to traditional chemotherapeutics. Recent regulatory approval of novel treatment options has significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, and the addition of these therapies has challenged clinicians to select and optimally sequence these new compounds. Additionally, the potential role of immunotherapy is being assessed in current uLMS clinical trials. Given the increasing number of agents available both in the U.S. and globally, a treatment template that addresses optimal sequencing based upon expert consensus would be useful. Current guidelines, although listing various options, lack granularity by line of therapy. Most patients with leiomyosarcoma, even in early stage, are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy despite uLMS being relatively chemoresistant. Adjuvant chemotherapy often includes the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel with or without doxorubicin in first-line systemic therapy, but these cytotoxic agents only provide patients with advanced disease a 5-year survival <30%. This review will focus on examination of current guidelines and consensus building for optimal sequencing of systemic therapies for advanced or recurrent uLMS. Critical ongoing studies investigating novel approaches including immunotherapeutics and genetic alterations also will be discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Recent regulatory approval of novel treatment options has significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, and the addition of these therapies has challenged clinicians to select and optimally sequence these compounds. This review will focus on examination of current guidelines and consensus building for optimal sequencing of systemic therapies for advanced or recurrent uterine leoimyosarcoma.

Genome profiling is an efficient tool to avoid the STUMP classification of uterine smooth muscle lesions: a comprehensive array-genomic hybridization analysis of 77 tumors

The diagnosis of a uterine smooth muscle lesion is, in the majority of cases, straightforward. However, in a small number of cases, the morphological criteria used in such lesions cannot differentiate with certainty a benign from a malignant lesion and a diagnosis of smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is made. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are often easy to diagnose but it is difficult or even impossible to identify a prognostic factor at the moment of the diagnosis with the exception of the stage. We hypothesize, for uterine smooth muscle lesions, that there is a gradient of genomic complexity that correlates to outcome. We first tested this hypothesis on STUMP lesions in a previous study and demonstrated that this 'gray category' could be split according to genomic index into two groups. A benign group, with a low to moderate alteration rate without recurrence and a malignant group, with a highly rearranged profile akin to uterine leiomyosarcomas. Here, we analyzed a large series of 77 uterine smooth muscle lesions (from 76 patients) morphologically classified as 19 leiomyomas, 14 STUMP and 44 leiomyosarcomas with clinicopathological and genomic correlations. We confirmed that genomic index with a cut-off=10 is a predictor of recurrence (P<0.0001) and with a cut-off=35 is a marker for poor overall survival (P=0.035). For the tumors confined to the uterus, stage as a prognostic factor was not useful in survival prediction. At stage I, among the tumors reclassified as molecular leiomyosarcomas (ie, genomic index ≥10), the poor prognostic markers were: 5p gain (overall survival P=0.0008), genomic index at cut-off=35 (overall survival P=0.0193), 13p loss including RB1 (overall survival P=0.0096) and 17p gain including MYOCD gain (overall survival P=0.0425). Based on these findings (and the feasibility of genomic profiling by array-comparative genomic hybridization), genomic index, 5p and 17p gains prognostic value could be evaluated in future prospective chemotherapy trials.

Sarcomas Involving the Abdominal and Pelvic Cavity

The principles of management of all sarcomas that involve the abdominal and pelvic cavity are presented. The anatomic sites for the primary malignancy include retroperitoneal sarcomas, pelvic side-wall sarcomas, sarcomas arising from the abdominal viscera, and sarcomas arising from the pelvic organs. All histologic types of sarcomas may be considered together when therapeutic options are being discussed. This presentation stresses surgical removal with an adequate margin of resection as the principal goal of management. The curative treatment of these cancers places great emphasis on the surgeon's knowledge of anatomy, technical skills, innovation, and surgical courage. Systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not shown reproducible efficacy. Complete resection in the absence of tumor spillage remains the only reliable treatment option. Possible benefits of induction chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy using cisplatin and doxorubicin in the early postoperative period are presented.

Management of Leimyosarcoma: A Survey Among Members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate current clinical management of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a Web-based survey among members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group regarding their treatment of LMS.

RESULTS

In total, 77 (27.8%) of 277 members responded to the survey. For surgical treatment of stage I LMS, 26.8% indicated total hysterectomy only and 16.9% indicated total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Also, lymph node dissection was indicated by 54.9% of respondents, whereas 46.5% stated that bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy could be omitted in young patients. More than half (57.7%) of the respondents recommended against adjuvant treatment. For stage I LMS diagnosed after morcellation, 79.2% of the respondents recommended lymph node dissection and 56.4% recommended adjuvant therapy. As for advanced-stage LMS, in cases of complete resection, adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred by 63.1%. For incomplete resection, combined radiotherapy/chemotherapy was the most preferred adjuvant therapy (63.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group members, there are many discrepancies in the clinical management of LMS. A large-scale prospective study to establish treatment guidelines is needed.

Options for Adjuvant Therapy for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare disease; in the data from the SEER database, 3165 cases of uLMS were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2012. While a majority of patients (60%) are diagnosed with early stage disease, recurrence rates are high. Five-year disease-specific survival is 76% for patients with FIGO stage I and 60% for patients with FIGO stage II disease. Adjuvant treatments, including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and combined modality approaches, have been explored with the goal of demonstrating improved survival. However, heterogeneous patient populations, small sample sizes, and lack of no-treatment control arms have limited the interpretation and reliability of the results from these studies. A randomized trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation compared to no additional treatment showed that adjuvant radiation did not improve recurrence or survival outcomes for early-stage uterine LMS. To date, no prospective, randomized trial has been completed comparing adjuvant chemotherapy to observation. A recent well-designed retrospective study showed that women treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-docetaxel had no improvement in progression-free or overall survival compared to women who received no additional treatment. Thus, current data support our recommendation against adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy treatment for patients with non-morcellated, completely resected, and uterine-confined leiomyosarcoma. We recommend that these patients be observed with periodic surveillance imaging and physical examinations.

Undiagnosed Uterine Sarcomas Identified During Surgery for Presumed Leiomyoma at a National Tertiary Hospital in Thailand: A 10-Year Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes of an undiagnosed uterine malignancy in patients who underwent surgical treatment for presumed leiomyomas.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent surgical treatment for presumed leiomyomas, from January 2004 to September 2013, were retrospectively reviewed, and the data were followed until September 2016. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, oncologic treatment, and response rate were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. This study includes follow-up data through December 31, 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 11,258 medical records of presumed leiomyoma patients undergoing hysterectomy during the studied period were reviewed. Pathology of uterine sarcoma was found in 22 patients (0.2%), all of whom were included. Nineteen patients had leiomyosarcoma, and 3 had endometrial stromal sarcoma. Mean age of patients was 48.3 ± 6.9 years. All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, with 20 patients undergoing concurrent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Uterine sarcoma was classified as stage IB in 21 patients and stage IIIC in 1 patient. Fifteen patients were prescribed the following adjuvant treatment: chemotherapy in 13 patients and megestrol acetate in 2 patients. Thirteen patients had recurrent disease, and 3 patients died of their disease. The mean progression-free survival was 50.1 ± 41.3 months, and overall survival was 59.3 ± 43.0 months.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 512 patients who underwent hysterectomy because of presumed uterine leiomyomas had inadvertent uterine sarcomas. Even with adjuvant therapy, treatment outcome was rather poor, with almost 60% recurrence rate and median progression-free survival and overall survival of less than 5 years.

Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Metastatic to the Brain: Case Report

Background

We report a leiomyosarcoma of the uterus, an uncommon tumor with a very aggressive course and poor prognosis due to the fact that, despite complete resection, it recurs with micrometastases. The most common metastatic sites are the lung, intraperitoneal, pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes, and liver. Brain and skull metastases are very rare.

Case

A 57-year-old woman underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for a grade T2N0M0 uterine leiomyosarcoma. There was no evidence of other lesions. Three months later a total-body PET scan demonstrated the presence of metastases in both lungs, and the patient was started on chemotherapy. One year later a cranial MRI demonstrated a brain metastasis to the temporal lobe. Emergency complete resection of the recurrence was performed, followed by whole-brain radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Given the limited treatment options, the gold standard for uterine leiomyosarcoma brain metastasis is total surgical removal. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy may provide only palliative benefit.

Organ-on-a-Chip Systems for Women's Health Applications

Biomedical research, for a long time, has paid little attention to the influence of sex in many areas of study, ranging from molecular and cellular biology to animal models and clinical studies on human subjects. Many studies solely rely on male cells/tissues/animals/humans, although there are profound differences in male and female physiology, which can significantly impact disease mechanisms, toxicity of compounds, and efficacy of pharmaceuticals. In vitro systems have been traditionally very limited in their capacity to recapitulate female-specific physiology and anatomy such as dynamic sex-hormone levels and the complex interdependencies of female reproductive tract organs. However, the advent of microphysiological organ-on-a-chip systems, which attempt to recreate the 3D structure and function of human organs, now gives researchers the opportunity to integrate cells and tissues from a variety of individuals. Moreover, adding a dynamic flow environment allows mimicking endocrine signaling during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy, as well as providing a controlled microfluidic environment for pharmacokinetic modeling. This review gives an introduction into preclinical and clinical research on women's health and discusses where organ-on-a-chip systems are already utilized or have the potential to deliver new insights and enable entirely new types of studies.

Systemic treatment in adult uterine sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare mesenchymal tumours of the uterus and are divided mainly into uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), adenosarcomas and high grade undifferentiated sarcoma (HGUS). US are often high-grade tumours with a high local recurrence rate and metastatic risk. We here discuss the current standard of care and knowledge of systemic therapy for adult uterine sarcomas, in particular uLMS, LG-ESS, HG-ESS and HGUS, in both the adjuvant as well as the metastatic setting.

Uterine sarcoma - current perspectives

Uterine sarcomas comprise a group of rare tumors with differing tumor biology, natural history and response to treatment. Diagnosis is often made following surgery for presumed benign disease. Currently, preoperative imaging does not reliably distinguish between benign leiomyomas and other malignant pathology. Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common sarcoma, but other subtypes include endometrial stromal sarcoma (low grade and high grade), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and adenosarcoma. Clinical trials have shown no definite survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy and have been hampered by the rarity and heterogeneity of these disease types. There is a role of adjuvant treatment in carefully selected cases following multidisciplinary discussion at sarcoma reference centers. In patients with metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy can then be considered. There is activity of a number of agents, including doxorubicin, trabectedin, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, eribulin and pazopanib. Patients should be considered for clinical trial entry where possible. Close international collaboration is important to allow progress in this group of diseases.

Adjuvant gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: Trends and survival outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess recent trends of administering adjuvant gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) chemotherapy for Stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma, and to compare disease-free and overall survival between women who received and did not receive adjuvant GD chemotherapy.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with Stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma in a California-Colorado population-based health plan inclusive of 2006-2013 were included in a retrospective cohort. Adjuvant GD chemotherapy rates, clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival estimates were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 111 women with Stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma, 33 received adjuvant GD (median 4cycles), 77 received no chemotherapy, and 1 patient excluded for non-GD chemotherapy. GD-chemotherapy and no-chemotherapy groups were similar with respect to age, stage (IA/IB), uterine weight, mitotic index, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity score. Non-Hispanic white women were twice as likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy as non-white or Hispanic women (37.7 vs. 17.1%, P=0.02). The proportion of women receiving adjuvant GD chemotherapy increased from 6.5% in 2006-2008 to 46.9% in 2009-2013 (P<0.001). There was no significance difference in unadjusted Kaplan-Meyer estimated disease-free (P=0.95) or overall survival (P=0.43) between GD-chemotherapy and no-chemotherapy cohorts. Corresponding adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for adjuvant GD chemotherapy compared to no chemotherapy were 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.80, P=0.97) for recurrence and 1.28 (95% CI 0.69-2.36, P-0.48) for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of adjuvant GD chemotherapy for Stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma has increased significantly in the last decade, despite unclear benefit. Compared to no chemotherapy, 4-6cycles of adjuvant GD chemotherapy does not appear to alter survival outcomes.

Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, or Combined Modality Therapy and the Impact on Survival for Uterine Carcinosarcoma Limited to the Pelvis

Objective

Clinical outcomes for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma are poor after surgical management alone. Adjuvant therapies including chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiation therapy (RT) have been previously investigated, but the optimal management of this disease remains controversial. The purposes of this study were to analyze the patterns of use of adjuvant CT and RT and to assess the impact on survival of each of these treatment regimens using the National Cancer Data Base.

Methods/Materials

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients given a diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma confined to the pelvis who underwent total hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2004 and 2011. Patients were excluded if they survived less than 4 months after diagnosis. Data regarding CT and RT use were collected. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of covariates on OS.

Results

A total of 4906 patients were included in this study. Median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 60–75 years). Median follow-up was 28.9 months (interquartile range, 15.4–52.9 months). There were 1777 patients (36.2%) who received no adjuvant treatment, 971 (19.8%) who received CT alone, 1060 (21.6%) who received RT alone, and 1098 (22.4%) who received both RT and CT. The 5-year OS for patients receiving no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant RT alone, adjuvant CT alone, and combined CT and RT were 44.9%, 47.1%, 47.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. On pairwise analysis, combined CT and RT was associated with improved survival compared with all other subgroups (P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, combined CT and RT (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–0.57; P < 0.001) and CT alone (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.88; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with improved OS, whereas RT alone was not.

Conclusions

Combination therapy with CT and RT was associated with significantly improved 5-year OS compared with no further therapy, RT alone, or CT alone.