1
|
Friedman CF, Manning-Geist BL, Zhou Q, Soumerai T, Holland A, Da Cruz Paula A, Green H, Ozsoy MA, Iasonos A, Hollmann T, Leitao MM, Mueller JJ, Makker V, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Liu YL, Rubinstein MM, Troso-Sandoval T, Lichtman SM, Schram A, Kyi C, Grisham RN, Causa Andrieu P, Wherry EJ, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Hensley ML, Zamarin D. Nivolumab for mismatch-repair-deficient or hypermutated gynecologic cancers: a phase 2 trial with biomarker analyses. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-02942-7. [PMID: 38653864 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02942-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are approved for therapy of gynecologic cancers with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), although predictors of response remain elusive. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 study of nivolumab in 35 patients with dMMR uterine or ovarian cancers. Co-primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival at 24 weeks (PFS24). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers and molecular correlates of response. The ORR was 58.8% (97.5% confidence interval (CI): 40.7-100%), and the PFS24 rate was 64.7% (97.5% one-sided CI: 46.5-100%), meeting the pre-specified endpoints. The DCR was 73.5% (95% CI: 55.6-87.1%). At the median follow-up of 42.1 months (range, 8.9-59.8 months), median OS was not reached. One-year OS rate was 79% (95% CI: 60.9-89.4%). Thirty-two patients (91%) had a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), including arthralgia (n = 10, 29%), fatigue (n = 10, 29%), pain (n = 10, 29%) and pruritis (n = 10, 29%); most were grade 1 or grade 2. Ten patients (29%) reported a grade 3 or grade 4 TRAE; no grade 5 events occurred. Exploratory analyses show that the presence of dysfunctional (CD8+PD-1+) or terminally dysfunctional (CD8+PD-1+TOX+) T cells and their interaction with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)+ cells were independently associated with PFS24. PFS24 was associated with presence of MEGF8 or SETD1B somatic mutations. This trial met its co-primary endpoints (ORR and PFS24) early, and our findings highlight several genetic and tumor microenvironment parameters associated with response to PD-1 blockade in dMMR cancers, generating rationale for their validation in larger cohorts.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03241745 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire F Friedman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tara Soumerai
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aliya Holland
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hunter Green
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melih Arda Ozsoy
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis Hollmann
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria M Rubinstein
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Troso-Sandoval
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart M Lichtman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alison Schram
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Causa Andrieu
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - E John Wherry
- Institute of Immunology,University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Tisch Cancer Institute,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Momeni-Boroujeni A, Mullaney K, DiNapoli SE, Leitao MM, Hensley ML, Katabi N, Allison DHR, Park KJ, Antonescu CR, Chiang S. Expanding the Spectrum of NR4A3 Fusion-Positive Gynecologic Leiomyosarcomas. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100474. [PMID: 38508521 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Recurrent gene fusions have been observed in epithelioid and myxoid variants of uterine leiomyosarcoma. PGR::NR4A3 fusions were recently described in a subset of epithelioid leiomyosarcomas exhibiting rhabdoid morphology. In this study, we sought to expand the clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of gynecologic leiomyosarcomas harboring NR4A3 rearrangements with PGR and novel fusion partners. We identified 9 gynecologic leiomyosarcomas harboring PGR::NR4A3, CARMN::NR4A3, ACTB::NR4A3, and possible SLCO5A1::NR4A3 fusions by targeted RNA sequencing. Tumors frequently affected premenopausal women, involving the uterine corpus, uterine cervix, or pelvis. All were similarly characterized by lobules of monomorphic epithelioid and/or spindled cells arranged in sheets, cords, trabeculae, and micro- and macrocysts associated with abundant myxoid matrix and hemorrhage, creating labyrinth-like or pulmonary edema-like architecture. Myogenic differentiation with frequent estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor staining and no CD10 expression characterized all tumors. All cases showed high NR4A3 RNA expression levels and NOR1 (NR4A3) nuclear staining similar to salivary gland acinic cell carcinomas and a subset of extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas harboring NR4A3 rearrangements. NOR1 (NR4A3) immunohistochemistry may serve as a useful diagnostic marker of NR4A3 fusion-positive gynecologic leiomyosarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Momeni-Boroujeni
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kerry Mullaney
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sara E DiNapoli
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nora Katabi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas H R Allison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sia TY, Gordhandas SB, Birsoy O, Kemel Y, Maio A, Salo-Mullen E, Sheehan M, Hensley ML, Rubinstein M, Makker V, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Roche KL, Mueller JJ, Leitao MM, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Berger MF, Ellenson LH, Latham A, Stadler Z, Offit K, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Mandelker D, Liu YL. Germline drivers of gynecologic carcinosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:34-41. [PMID: 37149903 PMCID: PMC10330315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in endometrial and ovarian carcinosarcomas and determine if gPVs are drivers of carcinosarcoma. METHODS Patients with endometrial or ovarian carcinosarcomas who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from 1/1/2015 to 6/1/2021 and consented to germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes were included. In patients with gPVs, biallelic inactivation was identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic pathogenic alterations. RESULTS Of 216 patients identified, 167 (77%) were diagnosed with endometrial carcinosarcoma and 49 (23%) with ovarian carcinosarcoma. Overall, 33 gPVs were observed in 29 patients (13%); 20 gPVs (61%) had biallelic loss in tumors. The rate of high-penetrance gPVs overall was 7% (16 of 216); 88% of high-penetrance gPVs had biallelic loss. In the endometrial carcinosarcoma cohort, 22 gPVs were found in 19 (11%) of 167 patients; 12 gPVs (55%) had biallelic loss in tumors, including 8 (89%) of 9 in high-penetrance gPVs. Among the ovarian carcinosarcoma cohort, 11 gPVs were found in 10 (20%) of 49 patients; 8 gPVs (73%) had biallelic loss in tumors, and all evaluable high-penetrance gPVs (n = 6) had biallelic loss. All gPVs in homologous recombination (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C) and Lynch syndrome (MSH2, MSH6) genes had biallelic loss in tumors (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS gPVs in genes affecting homologous recombination- or Lynch-associated mismatch repair exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors, suggesting likely drivers of gynecologic carcinosarcoma. Our data support germline testing for patients with gynecologic carcinosarcomas, given implications for treatment and risk-reduction in patients and at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sushmita B Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ozge Birsoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Rubinstein
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dermawan JK, Chiang S, Hensley ML, Tap WD, Antonescu CR. High-Grade Sarcomas with Myogenic Differentiation Harboring Hotspot PDGFRB Mutations. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100104. [PMID: 36788091 PMCID: PMC10198815 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PDGFRB-activating mutations have been reported in pediatric myofibroma and myofibromatosis. However, recurrent gain-of-function PDGFRB mutations have not been documented in sarcomas with myogenic differentiation. Driven by occasional sarcomas harboring PDGFRB mutations, we investigated their prevalence and clinicopathologic and genomic features in a large cohort of sarcomas. An institutional targeted DNA next-generation sequencing database was searched for sarcomas with myogenic differentiation harboring hotspot PDGFRB gene alterations. Among 3300 patients with sarcomas, 21 (0.6%) patients were identified (17 women, 4 men) with an age range of 35 to 88 years. The site distribution included 13 gynecologic tract (12 uteri, 1 vagina), 4 bone and soft tissue, and 4 viscera. All except 1 were high grade. Most patients were diagnosed as sarcomas with myogenic differentiation based on partial staining for 1 or more muscle markers, whereas 6 were labeled as leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Most tumors showed monomorphic spindle morphology, with either heterogeneous features of myofibroblastic and smooth muscle differentiation or an undifferentiated phenotype. Hormone receptors were negative in all uterine cases. PDGFRB immunostaining in all cases tested was strong and diffuse, whereas PDGFRA was negative/focal. The most frequent PDGFRB mutations were exon 12 (43%), exon 14 (N666K/S/T) (38%), and exon 18 (D850Y/H/V or insertion/deletion) (19%). The most frequent co-existing genetic alterations (26% to 37%) occurred in CDKN2A/B, TP53, TERT, and MED12. Moreover, PDGFRB-mutant sarcomas had an overall distinct genomic landscape compared with both uterine and soft tissue LMS control groups. These tumors were associated with a highly aggressive clinical course, with frequent distant metastases (81%) and death (76%), regardless of anatomic location, and worse overall survival compared with the 2 LMS control groups. This is the first study documenting recurrent hotspot PDGFRB alterations in high-grade sarcomas, which show a predilection for uterine location and myogenic differentiation that fall short of the diagnostic criteria for LMS. Further studies are needed to investigate the therapeutic potential of kinase inhibitors in this group of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine K Dermawan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William D Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Momeni-Boroujeni A, Yousefi E, Balakrishnan R, Riviere S, Kertowidjojo E, Hensley ML, Ladanyi M, Ellenson LH, Chiang S. Molecular-Based Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Diagnosis. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100084. [PMID: 36788080 PMCID: PMC10191186 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The morphologic assessment of uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) may be challenging, and diagnostic immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis is currently lacking. We evaluated the genomic landscape of 167 uterine LMS by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify common genomic alterations. IHC analyses corresponding to these genomic landmarks were applied to a test cohort of 16 uterine LMS, 6 smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), and 6 leiomyomas with NGS data and a validation cohort of 8 uterine LMS, 12 STUMP, 21 leiomyomas and leiomyoma variants, 7 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, and 2 diagnostically challenging uterine smooth muscle tumors. IHC results were individually interpreted by 3 pathologists blinded to NGS data. Overall, 94% of LMS showed ≥1 genomic alteration involving TP53, RB1, ATRX, PTEN, CDKN2A, or MDM2, with 80% showing alterations in ≥2 of these genes. In the test cohort, an initial panel of p53, Rb, PTEN, and ATRX was applied, followed by a panel of DAXX, MTAP, and MDM2 in cases without abnormalities. Abnormal p53, Rb, PTEN, and ATRX IHC expression was seen in 75%, 88%, 44%, and 38% of LMS, respectively, in the test cohort. Two or more abnormal IHC results among these markers were seen in 81% of LMS. STUMPs demonstrated only 1 IHC abnormality involving these markers. No IHC abnormalities were seen in leiomyomas. In the validation cohort, abnormal p53, Rb, and PTEN IHC results were seen in LMS, whereas rare STUMP or leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei showed IHC abnormalities involving only 1 of the markers. Abnormalities in ≥2 markers were present in both diagnostically challenging smooth muscle tumors, confirming LMS. Concordance was excellent among pathologists in the interpretation of IHC (κ = 0.97) and between IHC and NGS results (κ = 0.941). Uterine LMS exhibit genomic landmark alterations for which IHC surrogates exist, and a diagnostic algorithm involving molecular-based IHC may aid in the evaluation of unusual uterine smooth muscle tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Momeni-Boroujeni
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elham Yousefi
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Ridin Balakrishnan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Riviere
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth Kertowidjojo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kahn RM, Ragupathi G, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Kravetz S, Hensley ML, Konner JA, Makker V, Tew WP, Aghajanian C, Sabbatini PJ, O'Cearbhaill RE. Long-term outcomes of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with a polyvalent vaccine with bevacizumab combination. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:183-191. [PMID: 35779095 PMCID: PMC10123530 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To characterize the safety, immunogenicity, and outcomes of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in second or greater remission treated with a polyvalent antigen-KLH plus OPT-821 vaccine construct and bevacizumab. METHODS Patients with recurrent HGSOC were treated with the vaccine plus bevacizumab at our institution from 01/05/2011 to 03/20/2012. Follow-up continued until 03/2021. Blood/urine samples were collected. "Responders" had an immunogenic response to ≥ 3 antigens; "non-responders" to ≤ 2 antigens. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were treated on study. One developed a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 fever). Two (10%) experienced bevacizumab-related grade 3 hypertension. Thirteen (68%) and 16 (84%) of 19 responded to ≥ 3 and ≥ 2 antigens, respectively (Globo-H, GM2, TF cluster Tn, MUC-1). Four of 21 patients were alive > 5 years post-treatment. Responders and non-responders had a median PFS of 4.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-8.1) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 0.7-cannot estimate), respectively; median OS was 30.7 months (95% CI: 16.9-52.0) and 34.2 months (95% CI: 12.8-cannot estimate), respectively. On two-timepoint analysis (baseline, week 17), increased IL-8 exhibited improved PFS (HR as 10-unit increase, 0.43; p = 0.04); increased PDGF exhibited worse OS (HR as 10-unit increase, 1.01; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS This is the longest follow-up of vaccine administration with bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer. The vaccine was well tolerated with bevacizumab. Response was not associated with improved survival. On two-timepoint analysis, increased IL-8 was associated with significant improvement in PFS; increased PDGF with significantly worse OS. For all timepoint measurements, cytokine levels were not significantly associated with survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01223235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Govind Ragupathi
- Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Kravetz
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason A Konner
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul J Sabbatini
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith ES, Jansen C, Miller KM, Chiang S, Alektiar KM, Hensley ML, Mueller JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM. Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:882-890. [PMID: 35641004 PMCID: PMC9256804 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess potential predictive variables for nodal metastasis and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. METHODS We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who presented between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2019 and underwent hysterectomy at our institution or presented within 3 months of primary surgery elsewhere before recurrence. Patients who presented to our institution only at recurrence were excluded. Patients with <3 months of follow-up were excluded from survival analyses. RESULTS We identified 127 consecutive patients for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 19-88 years); 91 (74.6%) of 127 were pre-menopausal; and 74 (58.3%) of 127 had uterine-confined, stage I tumors. Of 56 patients (44.1%) who underwent lymph node sampling, 10 (17.9%) had nodal metastasis. Of the 10 with nodal metastasis, 1 (10%) did not have lymphadenopathy or extra-uterine disease, 4 (40%) had lymphadenopathy only, 1 (10%) had extra-uterine disease only, and 4 (40%) had both. Among the 29 patients without apparent extra-uterine disease or gross lymphadenopathy, there was one occult lymph node metastasis (3.4%). Gross lymphadenopathy at time of surgery was predictive for lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 69 months (range 4-336) for the 95 patients included in the survival analyses. The 5-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates were 79.8% and 90.8%, respectively. Patients with stage I tumors had longer progression-free survival than those with stage II-IV disease (p<0.001); there was no difference in disease-specific survival (p=0.63). Post-operative observation versus adjuvant therapy with hormone blockade or radiation therapy did not result in progression-free survival differences for stage I or completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.50 and p=0.81, respectively). Similarly, there was no disease-specific survival difference for completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS Lymph node dissection in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma should be reserved for those with clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy. Disease stage correlated with progression-free survival but not disease-specific survival. Post-operative therapy did not improve progression-free survival or disease-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Corinne Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn M Miller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dessources K, Miller KM, Kertowidjojo E, Da Cruz Paula A, Zou Y, Selenica P, da Silva EM, Benayed R, Ashley CW, Abu-Rustum NR, Dogan S, Soslow RA, Hensley ML, Weigelt B, Chiang S. ESR1 hotspot mutations in endometrial stromal sarcoma with high-grade transformation and endocrine treatment. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:972-978. [PMID: 34961764 PMCID: PMC9234101 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-01003-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (HGESSs) are more aggressive and have higher rates of resistance to endocrine therapy than low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESSs). The pathogenesis of hormonal resistance in these lesions has yet to be defined. Here we sought to histologically and genetically characterize 3 LGESSs and their recurrences that underwent histologic high-grade transformation following endocrine therapy. For this, DNA from primary tumors and select subsequent recurrences were subject to massively parallel sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutation analyses were performed using validated bioinformatics methods. In addition, RNA from each case was evaluated for the presence of gene fusions using targeted RNA-sequencing. All patients initially presented with LGESS, developed HGESS recurrences, and received at least 2 lines of hormonal suppressive therapy. Gene fusions classically described as associated with LGESS were identified in all 3 cases, including JAZF1-PHF1, EPC1-PHF1 and JAZF1-SUZ12 fusions for Cases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Targeted sequencing analysis revealed that none of the primary LGESS, however the HGESS recurrences of Cases 1 and 3, and the LGESS and HGESS recurrences of Case 2 post endocrine treatment harbored ESR1 p.Y537S hotspot mutations. These ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations have been found as a mechanism of acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Also, a reduction in estrogen receptor (ER) expression was observed in recurrences. Our findings suggest that the ESR1 p.Y537S hotspot mutation in LGESS with histologic high-grade transformation may be associated with endocrine resistance in these lesions. Furthermore, our data suggest that genetic analyses may be performed in recurrent LGESS following hormonal therapy, development of high-grade morphology, and/or altered/diminished ER expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Dessources
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn M Miller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Youran Zou
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edaise M da Silva
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles W Ashley
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Snjezana Dogan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nacev BA, Sanchez-Vega F, Smith SA, Antonescu CR, Rosenbaum E, Shi H, Tang C, Socci ND, Rana S, Gularte-Mérida R, Zehir A, Gounder MM, Bowler TG, Luthra A, Jadeja B, Okada A, Strong JA, Stoller J, Chan JE, Chi P, D'Angelo SP, Dickson MA, Kelly CM, Keohan ML, Movva S, Thornton K, Meyers PA, Wexler LH, Slotkin EK, Glade Bender JL, Shukla NN, Hensley ML, Healey JH, La Quaglia MP, Alektiar KM, Crago AM, Yoon SS, Untch BR, Chiang S, Agaram NP, Hameed MR, Berger MF, Solit DB, Schultz N, Ladanyi M, Singer S, Tap WD. Clinical sequencing of soft tissue and bone sarcomas delineates diverse genomic landscapes and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3405. [PMID: 35705560 PMCID: PMC9200818 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30453-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The genetic, biologic, and clinical heterogeneity of sarcomas poses a challenge for the identification of therapeutic targets, clinical research, and advancing patient care. Because there are > 100 sarcoma subtypes, in-depth genetic studies have focused on one or a few subtypes. Herein, we report a comparative genetic analysis of 2,138 sarcomas representing 45 pathological entities. This cohort is prospectively analyzed using targeted sequencing to characterize subtype-specific somatic alterations in targetable pathways, rates of whole genome doubling, mutational signatures, and subtype-agnostic genomic clusters. The most common alterations are in cell cycle control and TP53, receptor tyrosine kinases/PI3K/RAS, and epigenetic regulators. Subtype-specific associations include TERT amplification in intimal sarcoma and SWI/SNF alterations in uterine adenosarcoma. Tumor mutational burden, while low compared to other cancers, varies between and within subtypes. This resource will improve sarcoma models, motivate studies of subtype-specific alterations, and inform investigations of genetic factors and their correlations with treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Nacev
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- The Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Shaleigh A Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Evan Rosenbaum
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Hongyu Shi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Cerise Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas D Socci
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Bioinformatics Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Satshil Rana
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | | | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Mrinal M Gounder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Timothy G Bowler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Anisha Luthra
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Bhumika Jadeja
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Azusa Okada
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan A Strong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Jake Stoller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Jason E Chan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Ping Chi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Sandra P D'Angelo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Dickson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Ciara M Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Mary Louise Keohan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Sujana Movva
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Thornton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Paul A Meyers
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Leonard H Wexler
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Emily K Slotkin
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Julia L Glade Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Neerav N Shukla
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - John H Healey
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Michael P La Quaglia
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Aimee M Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Sam S Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Brian R Untch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Narasimhan P Agaram
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA.
| | - William D Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, 10065, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Crowley F, Cadoo KA, Chiang S, Mandelker DL, Bajwa R, Iasonos A, Zhou QC, Miller KM, Hensley ML, O'Cearbhaill RE. Evaluating the role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 40:100980. [PMID: 35434239 PMCID: PMC9011013 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIs may offer prolonged disease stability even in metastatic ESS, but response rates are modest. After disease progression on one AI, some patients may benefit from trial of a different AI. Optimal duration of therapy is unclear; results of a phase 2 study on interruption vs maintenance of AI in LGESS are awaited.
Objectives Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are rare, accounting for < 1% of all uterine malignancies. Treatment has been guided by small case series and retrospective studies. Endocrine therapy is used in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of AI use in the largest cohort of patients with LGESS to date. Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with LGESS treated with an AI at our institution from 1/1998–12/2020. Response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Results Forty patients were identified. Treatment was well tolerated, with 57.5% experiencing adverse effects. The most common were arthralgias (12 patients, 30%) and hot flashes (9, 22.5%). Two of 11 patients with RECIST-evaluable imaging experienced a partial response to treatment. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 79.2 months (95% CI 39.7 months to NE); the 5-year PFS rate was 59.6% (95% CI 41.8% to 73.6, p = 0.065). Median follow-up for the 29 survivors was 97.9 months (range: 12.6–226.7). The 5-year OS rate was 81.5% (95% CI 64.9–90.7%). One patient who discontinued AI after 10 years of treatment recurred 1 year later. Conclusion AIs were well tolerated and offered periods of prolonged disease stability, even in the metastatic setting. Our study suggests, however, that response rates may be lower than previously reported. Data on optimal duration of treatment is needed, but the rarity of LGESS is an obstacle to conducting large clinical trials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, Huang HQ, Moore KN, Tewari KS, Copeland LJ, Secord AA, Mutch DG, Santin A, Warshal DP, Spirtos NM, DiSilvestro PA, Ioffe OB, Miller DS. Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:968-977. [PMID: 35007153 PMCID: PMC8937015 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial (NCT00954174) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
- Matthew A. Powell, MD, The Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Mailstop 8064-37-905, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail:
| | - Virginia L. Filiaci
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Helen Q. Huang
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Kathleen N. Moore
- The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alessandro Santin
- Yale University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | - Olga B. Ioffe
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kyi C, Friedman CF, Mueller JJ, Benayed R, Ladanyi M, Arcila M, Yang SR, Hensley ML, Chiang S. Uterine mesenchymal tumors harboring ALK fusions and response to ALK-targeted therapy. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37:100852. [PMID: 34522753 PMCID: PMC8427213 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) of the uterus is a rare but aggressive malignancy that is often misdiagnosed. Approximately 50% of uterine IMTs (UMT) harbor rearrangements involving the ALK gene on chromosome 2p23 with subsequent overexpression of the ALK protein. Molecular characterization and wider availability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next generation sequencing (NGS) have improved clinical recognition and accurate diagnosis of UMT. The discovery of ALK fusions as a genomic driver led to the FDA approval of ALK inhibitors in ALK-altered lung cancers, but there are limited data to date on the spectrum of ALK fusions or patterns of response and resistance to ALK inhibitors in ALK-altered UMT. In this report we describe the genomic and histopathological characteristics and the response to ALK-targeted therapy in four patients with UMT. In all four patients, clinical activity of ALK inhibition was observed, with durable responses lasting 12 months or more. Moreover, three patients derived benefit from a second-generation ALK inhibitor after progression of disease or intolerance to the first-generation inhibitor crizotinib. Our report advocates for consideration of expanding the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to include later-generation ALK inhibitors for the treatment of ALK-rearranged UMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrisann Kyi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maria Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Soo Ryum Yang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vachha BA, Gohel S, Root JC, Kryza-Lacombe M, Hensley ML, Correa DD. Altered regional homogeneity in patients with ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy: a resting state fMRI study. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 16:539-546. [PMID: 34409561 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00525-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Many patients treated with chemotherapy for non-central nervous system (CNS) cancers experience cognitive dysfunction. However, few studies have investigated treatment-related neurotoxicity in women with ovarian cancer. The goal of this study was to assess regional brain function in patients with ovarian cancer after first-line chemotherapy. Seventeen patients with ovarian cancer and seventeen healthy controls matched for gender, age and education participated in the study. The patients were evaluated 1-4 months after completion of first line taxane/platinum chemotherapy. All participants underwent resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) indices were calculated. The results showed that patients had significantly decreased average ReHo values in the left middle frontal gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex, and right superior parietal lobule, compared to healthy controls. This is the first rsfMRI study showing ReHo alterations in frontal and parietal regions in patients with ovarian cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. The findings are overall congruent with prior studies in non-CNS cancer populations and provide supporting evidence for the prevailing notion that frontal areas are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behroze A Vachha
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Suril Gohel
- Department of Health Informatics, Rutgers University School of Health Professions, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ, 07107, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Kryza-Lacombe
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Denise D Correa
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. .,Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pedra Nobre S, Hensley ML, So M, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Leitao MM, Ducie J, Chiang S, Mueller JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Zivanovic O. The impact of tumor fragmentation in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma on patterns of recurrence and oncologic outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 160:99-105. [PMID: 33158511 PMCID: PMC7779751 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of tumor fragmentation on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). METHODS We identified all patients diagnosed with stage I uLMS presenting to our institution within three months of primary surgery, 1/2000-1/2019. Patients with recurrent disease were excluded. The non-morcellated group had total hysterectomy without documented specimen fragmentation; the morcellated group, total hysterectomy with documented specimen fragmentation. We defined fragmentation as manual fragmentation or morcellation (via power morcellator or otherwise) of the specimen in peritoneal cavity or vagina. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS 152 patients met inclusion criteria. 107 (70%) underwent total hysterectomy (non-morcellated); 45 (30%) underwent morcellation. Median age at diagnosis for the entire cohort was 55 years (range 30-91). Median follow-up was 42.1 months (range 1.1-197.8). 40 (26.3%) patients had primary surgery at our institution, 112 (73.7%) at an outside hospital. In total 110 (72.3%) recurred: 72/107 (67.2%) non-morcellated; 38/44 (86.3%) morcellated. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for non-morcellated versus morcellated was 13.8 (95%CI 9.2-20.2) versus 7.3 months (95%CI 3-13.1), HR 1.5 (95%CI 1.02-2.24); P = 0.04. Median overall survival (OS) for non-morcellated versus morcellated was 82.1 (95%CI 52.4-122) versus 47.8 months (95%CI 28.5-129.6), HR 1.1 (95%CI 0.67-1.82); P = 0.7. Among patients with recurrence, 69.4% of non-morcellated recurred at hematogenous sites only, 18.1% recurred in peritoneum only; 28.9% of morcellated recurred at hematogenous sites, 63.2% in peritoneum. Race, lymphovascular invasion, postoperative chemotherapy, were independently associated with PFS. Mitotic index was independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS Tumor fragmentation/morcellation was associated with significantly higher risk of recurrence and a nearly 4-fold increase in peritoneal recurrence. Prognostic biomarkers remain important in predicting oncologic outcomes, independent of fragmentation or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvana Pedra Nobre
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Melody So
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States of America
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Ducie
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Ob/Gyn, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Selenica P, Conlon N, Gonzalez C, Frosina D, Jungbluth AA, Beets-Tan RGH, Rao MK, Zhang Y, Benayed R, Ladanyi M, Solit DB, Chiang S, Hyman DM, Hensley ML, Soslow RA, Weigelt B, Murali R. Genomic Profiling Aids Classification of Diagnostically Challenging Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors With Myomelanocytic Differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:77-92. [PMID: 32889887 PMCID: PMC8276853 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although diagnosis of high-grade uterine mesenchymal tumors (UMTs) exhibiting classic morphologic features is straightforward, diagnosis is more challenging in tumors in which prototypical features are poorly developed, focal, and/or coexist with features seen in other neoplasms. Here, we sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in diagnostically challenging UMTs with myomelanocytic differentiation, including some reported as perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas). In 17 samples from 15 women, the tumors were histologically heterogenous. Immunohistochemical expression of at least 1 melanocytic marker (HMB45, Melan-A, or MiTF) was identified in all tumors, and of myogenic markers (desmin or smooth muscle actin) in most tumors. Targeted massively parallel sequencing revealed several genetic alterations, most commonly in TP53 (41% mutation, 12% deletion), TSC2 (29% mutation, 6% deletion), RB1 (18% deletion), ATRX (24% mutation), MED12 (12% mutation), BRCA2 (12% deletion), CDKN2A (6% deletion) as well as FGFR3, NTRK1, and ERBB3 amplification (each 6%). Gene rearrangements (JAZF1-SUZ12; DNAJB6-PLAG1; and SFPQ-TFE3) were identified in 3 tumors. Integrating histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic findings, tumors from 4 patients were consistent with malignant PEComa (1 TFE3-rearranged); 6 were classified as leiomyosarcomas; 3 showed overlapping features of PEComa and other sarcoma types (leiomyosarcoma or low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma); and 2 were classified as sarcoma, not otherwise specified. Our findings suggest that diagnostically challenging UMTs with myomelanocytic differentiation represent a heterogenous group of neoplasms which harbor a diverse repertoire of somatic genetic alterations; these genetic alterations can aid classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Selenica
- Departments of Pathology
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology
| | - Niamh Conlon
- Departments of Pathology
- Department of Pathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - David B. Solit
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rosenbaum E, Jonsson P, Seier K, Qin LX, Chi P, Dickson M, Gounder M, Kelly C, Keohan ML, Nacev B, Donoghue MTA, Chiang S, Singer S, Ladanyi M, Antonescu CR, Hensley ML, Movva S, D’Angelo SP, Tap WD. Clinical Outcome of Leiomyosarcomas With Somatic Alteration in Homologous Recombination Pathway Genes. JCO Precis Oncol 2020; 4:PO.20.00122. [PMID: 33283135 PMCID: PMC7713532 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To detect alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, measure homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and correlate these findings with clinical outcome in patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with LMS treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center who consented to prospective targeted next-generation sequencing with MSK-IMPACT were screened for oncogenic somatic variants in one of 33 DDR genes; where feasible, an experimental HRD score was calculated from IMPACT data. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated after stratifying patients by DDR gene alteration status and HRD score. RESULTS Of 211 patients with LMS, 20% had an oncogenic DDR gene alteration. Univariable analysis of PFS in 117 patients who received standard frontline chemotherapy in the metastatic setting found that an altered homologous recombination pathway gene was significantly associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.07; P = .035). Non-BRCA homologous recombination gene alteration was associated with shorter PFS (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.35 to 5.04; P = .004) compared with BRCA-altered and wild-type homologous recombination genes. Univariable analysis of OS from diagnosis in the entire cohort of 211 patients found that age, tumor size, number of metastatic sites, localized disease, and non-BRCA homologous recombination gene alteration were significantly associated with OS. On multivariable analysis, non-BRCA homologous recombination pathway gene alteration remained significant (HR, 4.91; 95% CI, 2.47 to 9.76; P < .001). High HRD score was not associated with a different PFS or OS. CONCLUSION Patients with LMS with homologous recombination pathway gene alterations have poor clinical outcomes, particularly those with non-BRCA gene alterations. HRD score calculated from a targeted exome panel did not discern disparate clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Rosenbaum
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Philip Jonsson
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Seier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ping Chi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark Dickson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mrinal Gounder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ciara Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mary L. Keohan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin Nacev
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark T. A. Donoghue
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Martee L. Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sujana Movva
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sandra P. D’Angelo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - William D. Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zou Y, Turashvili G, Soslow RA, Park KJ, Croce S, McCluggage WG, Stewart CJR, Oda Y, Oliva E, Young RH, Da Cruz Paula A, Dessources K, Ashley CW, Hensley ML, Yip S, Weigelt B, Benayed R, Antonescu CR, Lee CH, Chiang S. High-grade transformation of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas lacking YWHAE and BCOR genetic abnormalities. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:1861-1870. [PMID: 32317704 PMCID: PMC8288077 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0535-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
High-grade histologic transformation of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is rare. Here, we describe the clinicopathologic features and gene fusion status of 12 cases (11 primary uterine corpus and 1 primary vaginal), 11 diagnosed prospectively from 2016, and 1 retrospectively collected. Targeted RNA sequencing and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization was employed in all cases. High-grade transformation was seen at the time of initial diagnosis in eight patients and at the time of recurrence in four patients, 4-11 years after initial diagnosis of LGESS. High-grade morphology consisted of generally uniform population of round to epithelioid cells with enlarged nuclei one to two times larger than a lymphocyte, visible nucleoli, and increased mitotic index (range, 6-30; median, 16 per 10 high-power fields); there was often an associated sclerotic and/or myxoid stroma. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10 expression was absent or significantly decreased (compared with the low-grade component) in the high-grade foci of five tumors. One tumor demonstrated positive (diffuse and strong) cyclin D1 and BCOR staining. p53 staining was wild type in both components of all eight tumors tested. JAZF1-SUZ12 (n = 6), JAZF1-PHF1 (n = 3), EPC1-PHF1, (n = 1), or BRD8-PHF1 (n = 1) fusions were detected in 11 tumors; no fusions were found in one by targeted RNA sequencing. Patients presented with FIGO stages I (n = 4), II (n = 4), III (n = 1), and IV disease (n = 2). Median overall survival calculated from the time of histologic transformation was 22 months (range, 8 months to 8 years) with five patients who died of disease 8-18 months after transformation. High-grade transformation may occur in LGESS with JAZF1 and PHF1 rearrangements at the time of or years after initial diagnosis. Such high-grade transformation is characterized by nuclear enlargement, prominent nucleoli, and increased mitotic index compared with typical LGESS. Histologic high-grade transformation may herald aggressive behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youran Zou
- Department of Pathology, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sabrina Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Colin J R Stewart
- Department of Pathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Yoshinao Oda
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Esther Oliva
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert H Young
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Department of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Dessources
- Department of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles W Ashley
- Department of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shushkevich A, Thaker PH, Littell RD, Shah NA, Chiang S, Thornton K, Hensley ML, Slomovitz BM, Holcomb KM, Leitao MM, Toboni MD, Powell MA, Levine DA, Dowdy SC, Klopp A, Brown J. State of the science: Uterine sarcomas: From pathology to practice. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:3-7. [PMID: 32839026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ramey D Littell
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Gynecologic Cancer Program, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Sarah Chiang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Martee L Hensley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Kevin M Holcomb
- Weill Cornell Medical College at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael D Toboni
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Ann Klopp
- The University of Texas M.D., Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jubilee Brown
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hensley ML, Chavan SS, Solit DB, Murali R, Soslow R, Chiang S, Jungbluth AA, Bandlamudi C, Srinivasan P, Tap WD, Rosenbaum E, Taylor BS, Donoghue MTA, Hyman DM. Genomic Landscape of Uterine Sarcomas Defined Through Prospective Clinical Sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3881-3888. [PMID: 32299819 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined whether prospective molecular characterization of advanced metastatic disease can reveal grade and/or histology-specific differences to inform diagnosis and facilitate enrollment onto clinical trials. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with uterine sarcoma consented to a prospective study of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical annotations were extracted from their medical record. Tumor and matched normal DNA were subjected to NGS, and the genomic landscape was explored for survival correlations and therapeutic targetability. RESULTS Tumors from 107 women were sequenced and included leiomyosarcoma (n = 80), high-grade non-leiomyosarcoma (n = 22), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS, n = 4), and smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP, n = 2). Genomic profiling influenced histologic diagnosis in three cases. Common uterine leiomyosarcoma alterations were loss-of-function mutations in TP53 (56%), RB1 (51%), and ATRX (31%). Homozygous deletions of BRCA2 were present in 5% of these patients. PTEN alteration frequency was higher in the metastases samples as compared with the primary samples. Genomes of low-grade tumors were largely silent, while 50.5% of high-grade tumors had whole-genome duplication. Two metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma cases were hypermutated. Both had prolonged disease-free survival. Potentially actionable mutations were identified in 48 patients (45%), 8 (17%) of whom received matched therapy with 2 achieving clinical responses. Among patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma with somatic BRCA2 alterations, sustained partial responses were observed with PARP inhibitor-containing therapy. DISCUSSION Prospective genomic profiling can contribute to diagnostic precision and inform treatment selection in patients with uterine sarcomas. There was evidence of clinical benefit in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma with somatic BRCA2 alterations treated with PARP inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Shweta S Chavan
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David B Solit
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Achim A Jungbluth
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Preethi Srinivasan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William D Tap
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan Rosenbaum
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Barry S Taylor
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark T A Donoghue
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David M Hyman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mai PL, Huang HQ, Wenzel LB, Han PK, Moser RP, Rodriguez GC, Boggess J, Rutherford TJ, Cohn DE, Kauff ND, Phillips KA, Wilkinson K, Wenham RM, Hamilton C, Powell MA, Walker JL, Greene MH, Hensley ML. Prospective follow-up of quality of life for participants undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or ovarian cancer screening in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/GOG study. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:131-139. [PMID: 31759774 PMCID: PMC6980744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and ovarian cancer screening (OCS) are management options for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Long-term effects of these interventions on quality of life (QOL) are not well understood. METHODS GOG-0199 is a prospective cohort study of women at increased ovarian cancer risk who chose either RRSO or OCS as their risk management intervention. At study entry, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months of follow-up, participants completed the QOL questionnaire, which included the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36, the Impact of Events Scales, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Subscale, and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire. QOL measures were compared between the RRSO and OCS cohort at baseline and over time. RESULTS Five-hundred-sixty-two participants in the RRSO cohort and 1,010 in the OCS completed the baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. At baseline, participants selecting RRSO reported lower health-related QOL (HRQOL), greater ovarian cancer-related stress, greater anxiety, and more depressive symptomatology, which improved during follow-up, especially for ovarian cancer-related stress. Screening was not found to adversely impact HRQOL. Hormone-related menopausal symptoms worsened and sexual functioning declined during follow-up in both cohorts, but more so among participants who underwent RRSO. CONCLUSIONS HRQOL improved after surgery among women who chose RRSO and remained stable among participants undergoing screening. The adverse effects of RRSO and screening on short-term and long-term sexual activity and sexual functioning warrant consideration in the decision-making process for high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong L Mai
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850-9772, USA.
| | - Helen Q Huang
- NRG Oncology, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 14263-0001, USA.
| | - Lari B Wenzel
- Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, 92697, USA.
| | - Paul K Han
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, 04101, USA.
| | - Richard P Moser
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850-9761, USA.
| | - Gustavo C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, North Shore University Health System; Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
| | - John Boggess
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Raleigh NY 27607, USA.
| | | | - David E Cohn
- Ohio State University, Columbus Cancer Council; GYN Oncology; Columbus, OH, 43026, USA.
| | - Noah D Kauff
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Surgery Department; New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Medicine, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 300 AU, Australia.
| | - Kelly Wilkinson
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Dept. of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
| | - Robert M Wenham
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Gynecology Oncology Division; Tampa, FL, 33612-9497, USA.
| | - Chad Hamilton
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Joan L Walker
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850-9772, USA.
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rubinstein MM, Hyman DM, Caird I, Won H, Soldan K, Seier K, Iasonos A, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Grisham RN, Hensley ML, Troso-Sandoval T, Sabbatini P, Guillen J, Selcuklu SD, Zimel C, Torrisi J, Aghajanian C, Makker V. Phase 2 study of LY3023414 in patients with advanced endometrial cancer harboring activating mutations in the PI3K pathway. Cancer 2019; 126:1274-1282. [PMID: 31880826 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PI3K pathway activation is common in endometrial cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, LY3023414, in patients with advanced endometrial cancer harboring activating mutations in the PI3K pathway. METHODS We conducted a single-arm phase 2 study of monotherapy LY3023414. Eligible patients had advanced endometrial cancer of any grade, prior management with 1-4 cytotoxic lines, and PI3K pathway activation prospectively defined as a loss-of-function PTEN alteration or activating alteration in PIK3CA, AKT1, PIK3R1, PIK3R2, or MTOR. The primary objective was best overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were treated; histologies included endometroid (39%), carcinosarcoma (25%), serous (21%), and mixed (14%). Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 2 prior cytotoxic lines (range, 1-3). The most common alterations involved PIK3CA (68%), PTEN (43%), and PIK3R1 (32%). In the 25 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 16% (90% CI, 7%-100%), and the clinical benefit rate was 28% (90% CI, 16%-100%). Four patients had a confirmed partial response, and 2 responses lasted for >9 months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.0) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 5.0-15.9), respectively. The most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events were anemia (71%), hyperglycemia (71%), hypoalbuminemia (68%), and hypophosphatemia (61%). No correlation between molecular alterations and response was observed. CONCLUSION In patients with heavily pretreated advanced endometrial cancer prospectively selected for tumors with activating PI3K pathway mutations, LY3023414 demonstrated modest single-agent activity and a manageable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria M Rubinstein
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David M Hyman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Imogen Caird
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Helen Won
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Krysten Soldan
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Seier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Tiffany Troso-Sandoval
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Paul Sabbatini
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Joyce Guillen
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - S Duygu Selcuklu
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Catherine Zimel
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jean Torrisi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jones RL, Demetri GD, Schuetze SM, Milhem M, Elias A, Van Tine BA, Hamm J, McCarthy S, Wang G, Parekh T, Knoblauch R, Hensley ML, Maki RG, Patel S, von Mehren M. Efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in elderly patients with sarcoma: subgroup analysis from a phase III, randomized controlled study of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1995-2002. [PMID: 30084934 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment options for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients aged ≥65 years (elderly) can be limited by concerns regarding the increased risk of toxicity associated with standard systemic therapies. Trabectedin has demonstrated improved disease control in a phase III trial (ET743-SAR-3007) of patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Since previous retrospective analyses have suggested that trabectedin has similar safety and efficacy outcomes regardless of patient age, we carried out a subgroup analysis of the safety and efficacy observed in elderly patients enrolled in this trial. Patients and methods Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to trabectedin (n = 384) or dacarbazine (n = 193) administered intravenously every-3-weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, symptom severity, and safety. A post hoc analysis was conducted in the elderly patient subgroup. Results Among 131 (trabectedin = 94; dacarbazine = 37) elderly patients, disease characteristics were well-balanced and consistent with those of the total study population. Treatment exposure was longer in patients treated with trabectedin versus dacarbazine (median four versus two cycles, respectively), with a significantly higher proportion receiving prolonged therapy (≥6 cycles) in the trabectedin arm (43% versus 23%, respectively; P = 0.04). Elderly patients treated with trabectedin showed significantly improved PFS [4.9 versus 1.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR)=0.40; P = 0.0002] but no statistically significant improvement in OS (15.1 versus 8.0 months, respectively; HR = 0.72; P = 0.18) or ORR (9% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.43). The safety profile for elderly trabectedin-treated patients was comparable to that of the overall trabectedin-treated study population. Conclusions This subgroup analysis of the elderly population of ET743-SAR-3007 suggests that elderly patients with STS and good performance status can expect clinical benefit from trabectedin similar to that observed in younger patients. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01343277.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Jones
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle
| | - G D Demetri
- Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston
| | | | - M Milhem
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City
| | - A Elias
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora
| | - B A Van Tine
- Division of Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis
| | - J Hamm
- Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville
| | - S McCarthy
- Clinical Oncology, Janssen Research and Development, Raritan
| | - G Wang
- Clinical Biostatistics, Janssen Research and Development, Raritan
| | - T Parekh
- Clinical Oncology, Janssen Research and Development, Raritan
| | - R Knoblauch
- Clinical Oncology, Janssen Research and Development, Raritan
| | - M L Hensley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - R G Maki
- Monter Cancer Center, Northwell Health, Lake Success; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor
| | - S Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M von Mehren
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cybulska P, Sioulas V, Orfanelli T, Zivanovic O, Mueller JJ, Broach VA, Long Roche KC, Sonoda Y, Hensley ML, O'Cearbhaill RE, Chi DS, Alektiar KM, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM. Secondary surgical resection for patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:333-337. [PMID: 31200927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes after secondary surgical resection in patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients who had no evidence of disease after initial surgery for uLMS, who underwent surgery for a first recurrence at our institution between 1/1991 and 10/2013. We excluded patients who received any therapy for recurrence prior to secondary resection, and patients who underwent surgery soon after morcellation [of presumed benign fibroids] showed widespread disease. Overall survival (OS) was determined from time of first recurrence to death or last follow-up. RESULTS We identified 62 patients: 29 with abdominal/pelvic recurrence only, 30 with lung recurrence only, 3 with both. Median time to first recurrence was 18 months (95% CI: 13.3-23.3): 15.8 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.6) abdominal/pelvic recurrence; 24.1 months (95% CI: 14.5-33.7) lung-only recurrence (p = 0.03). Median OS was 37.7 months (95% CI: 25.9-49.6) abdominal/pelvic recurrence; 78.1 months (95% CI: 44.8-11.4) lung recurrence (p = 0.02). Complete gross resection (CGR) was achieved in 58 cases (93%), with gross residual ≤1 cm in 2 (3.5%) and >1 cm in 2 (3.5%). Median OS based on residual disease was 54.1 months (95% CI: 24.9-83.3), 38.7 months (95% CI: NE), 1.7 months (95% CI: NE), respectively (p < 0.001). In cases with CGR, neither adjuvant radiation (N = 9), chemotherapy (N = 8) nor hormonal therapy (N = 10) was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Secondary surgical resection of recurrent uLMS is reasonable in patients with a high probability of achieving CGR. Lung-only recurrences were associated with more favorable outcome. Following CGR, additional therapy may not offer benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Cybulska
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vasileios Sioulas
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Theofano Orfanelli
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vance A Broach
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kara C Long Roche
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patel S, von Mehren M, Reed DR, Kaiser P, Charlson J, Ryan CW, Rushing D, Livingston M, Singh A, Seth R, Forscher C, D'Amato G, Chawla SP, McCarthy S, Wang G, Parekh T, Knoblauch R, Hensley ML, Maki RG, Demetri GD. Overall survival and histology-specific subgroup analyses from a phase 3, randomized controlled study of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma. Cancer 2019; 125:2610-2620. [PMID: 31173362 PMCID: PMC6771856 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a randomized phase 3 study of trabectedin versus dacarbazine in previously-treated patients with liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma (LPS/LMS). METHODS Patients were randomized 2:1 to trabectedin (n = 384) or dacarbazine (n = 193) administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, objective response rate, safety, and patient-reported outcomes, all previously reported and demonstrating superior disease control with trabectedin. Results of the final OS analysis in preplanned subgroups of patients with LPS/LMS are presented. RESULTS At the time of the final OS analysis, 577 patients had been assigned randomly, including 423 (73%) with LMS and 154 (27%) with LPS. The median duration of treatment exposure was higher in the trabectedin arm compared with the dacarbazine arm (4 vs 2 cycles), as was the proportion of patients receiving an extended number of therapy courses (≥6 cycles: 42% vs 22%). This pattern was consistent across histological subgroups: the median number of treatment cycles (4 vs 2 for both subgroups) and proportion of patients with ≥6 treatment cycles (LMS, 43% vs 24%; LPS, 40% vs 16%). Despite improved disease control by trabectedin, no improvement in OS was observed; the final median OS for trabectedin versus dacarbazine was 13.7 versus 13.1 months (P = .49). Sensitivity analyses of OS suggest confounding by post-study anticancer therapies, which were utilized in most patients in both treatment arms (71% vs 69%, respectively). CONCLUSION The final OS results demonstrated comparable survival between LPS/LMS patients receiving trabectedin or dacarbazine, which is consistent with the interim analysis results. Both LPS and LMS demonstrated improved disease control with trabectedin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pamela Kaiser
- Lutheran General Advanced Care Center, Park Ridge, Illinois
| | | | - Christopher W Ryan
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Daniel Rushing
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Michael Livingston
- Blumenthal Cancer Center, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Arun Singh
- UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rahul Seth
- SUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - Gina D'Amato
- Georgia Cancer Specialists, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - George Wang
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey
| | - Trilok Parekh
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - George D Demetri
- Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
D'Adamo DR, Dickson MA, Keohan ML, Carvajal RD, Hensley ML, Hirst CM, Ezeoke MO, Ahn L, Qin LX, Antonescu CR, Lefkowitz RA, Maki RG, Schwartz GK, Tap WD. A Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Dacarbazine for Leiomyosarcoma, Synovial Sarcoma, and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. Oncologist 2019; 24:857-863. [PMID: 30126857 PMCID: PMC6656505 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sorafenib and dacarbazine have low single-agent response rates in metastatic sarcomas. As angiogenesis inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy, we investigated the combination of sorafenib and dacarbazine in select sarcoma subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SS), or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) with up to two previous lines of therapy and adequate hepatic, renal, and marrow function received 3-week cycles of sorafenib at 400 mg oral twice daily and dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously (later reduced to 850 mg/m2). Patients were evaluated for response every 6 weeks. The primary objective was to determine the disease control rate (DCR) of sorafenib plus dacarbazine in the selected sarcoma subtypes. RESULTS The study included 37 patients (19 female); median age was 55 years (range 26-87); and histologies included LMS (22), SS (11), and MPNST (4). The DCR was 46% (17/37). Median progression-free survival was 13.4 weeks. The RECIST response rate was 14% (5/37). The Choi response rate was 51% (19/37). Median overall survival was 13.2 months. Of the first 25 patients, 15 (60%) required dacarbazine dose reductions for hematologic toxicity, with one episode of grade 5 neutropenic fever. After reducing the starting dose of dacarbazine to 850 mg/m2, only 3 of the final 12 (25%) patients required dose reduction. CONCLUSION This phase II study met its primary endpoint with an 18-week DCR of 46%. The clinical activity of dacarbazine plus sorafenib in patients with these diagnoses is modest. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of relatively rare malignancies. Most patients are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy in the form of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Response rates are relatively low, and there is a need for better therapies. This clinical trial demonstrates that combining a cytotoxic therapy (dacarbazine) with an antiangiogenic small molecule (sorafenib) is feasible and associated with favorable disease-control rates; however, it also increases the potential for significant toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark A Dickson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mary L Keohan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Catherine M Hirst
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marietta O Ezeoke
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Linda Ahn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert A Lefkowitz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Gary K Schwartz
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - William D Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hensley ML, Enserro D, Miller DS. Reply to F. Tomao et al. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:936. [PMID: 30811298 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L Hensley
- Martee L. Hensley, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Danielle Enserro, PhD, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; and David S. Miller, MD, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Danielle Enserro
- Martee L. Hensley, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Danielle Enserro, PhD, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; and David S. Miller, MD, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David S Miller
- Martee L. Hensley, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Danielle Enserro, PhD, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; and David S. Miller, MD, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Boland JL, Zhou Q, Martin M, Callahan MK, Konner J, O'Cearbhaill RE, Friedman CF, Tew W, Makker V, Grisham RN, Hensley ML, Zecca N, Iasonos AE, Snyder A, Hyman DM, Sabbatini P, Aghajanian C, Cadoo KA, Zamarin D. Early disease progression and treatment discontinuation in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving immune checkpoint blockade. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:251-258. [PMID: 30470581 PMCID: PMC6613945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Delayed responses observed with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) present a challenge for patients with peritoneal malignancies, who risk early symptomatic disease progression requiring treatment discontinuation. While efforts are ongoing to define the biomarkers of response, it is equally important to identify patients at risk for early discontinuation. We sought to investigate the timing of disease progression in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with ICB and to identify pre-treatment clinical parameters associated with early discontinuation. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed on EOC patients treated with ICB at MSKCC from January 2013 to May 2017. Cutoffs for early and very early discontinuation due to disease progression were defined at 12 and 8 weeks, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were built based on pre-treatment clinical variables. RESULTS Of 108 identified patients, 89 were included in the analysis. Forty-six (51.7%) patients discontinued therapy early, 30 of which (33.7%) discontinued therapy very early. Eight patients (9.0%) died within 12 weeks of ICB initiation from disease progression. In multivariate analyses, bulky peritoneal disease (p = 0.009, OR: 4.94) and liver parenchymal metastases (p = 0.001, OR: 8.08) were associated with early discontinuation. Liver parenchymal metastases (p = 0.001, OR 6.64), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.021, OR: 3.54), were associated with very early discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Over 50% of EOC patients suffer disease progression requiring early discontinuation of ICB. Pre-treatment prognostic clinical characteristics may identify patients at highest risk for early discontinuation due to disease progression and warrant caution in using these agents in late line patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia L Boland
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Madhuri Martin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret K Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Konner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William Tew
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Zecca
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia E Iasonos
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra Snyder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - David M Hyman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Sabbatini
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hensley ML, Enserro D, Hatcher H, Ottevanger PB, Krarup-Hansen A, Blay JY, Fisher C, Moxley KM, Lele SB, Lea JS, Tewari KS, Thaker PH, Zivanovic O, O’Malley DM, Robison K, Miller DS. Adjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Followed by Doxorubicin Versus Observation for High-Grade Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Phase III NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1800454. [PMID: 30289732 PMCID: PMC6241678 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma. METHODS Women with uterus-confined, high-grade leiomyosarcoma who were confirmed disease free by imaging were randomly assigned to four cycles of gemcitabine plus docetaxel, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin, or to observation. All were followed for evidence of recurrence. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS With international collaboration, 38 of the targeted accrual of 216 patients were enrolled, after which the study was closed by the National Cancer Institute for accrual futility. Twenty patients were assigned to chemotherapy, 18 to observation. Among the 17 patients treated with at least one cycle of chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 47%; among the 18 patients assigned to observation, one had grade 3 hypertension. There were six deaths (chemotherapy, n = 5; observation, n = 1), all due to disease. The restricted mean survival time for OS was estimated as 34.3 months (95% CI, 25.3 to 43.3 months) in the chemotherapy arm and as 46.4 months (95% CI, 43.6 to 49.1 months) in the observation arm. There were eight recurrences in each arm. The restricted mean survival time for recurrence-free survival was estimated as 18.1 (95% CI, 14.2 to 22.0) months in the chemotherapy arm and as 14.6 months (95% CI, 10.3 to 19.0 months) in the observation arm. Neither survival outcome comparison was considered statistically robust, due to the small sample size. CONCLUSION Despite international collaboration to test the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine-confined leiomyosarcoma, this study was closed for accrual futility. Although the sample size precludes robust statistical comparison, observed OS and recurrence-free survival data do not show superior outcomes with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L. Hensley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Danielle Enserro
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Helen Hatcher
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Anders Krarup-Hansen
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Katherine M. Moxley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shashikant B. Lele
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Jayanthi S. Lea
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Krishnansu S. Tewari
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Premal H. Thaker
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David M. O’Malley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Katina Robison
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David S. Miller
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Soumerai TE, Donoghue MTA, Bandlamudi C, Srinivasan P, Chang MT, Zamarin D, Cadoo KA, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, Konner JA, Hensley ML, Makker V, Sabbatini P, Spriggs DR, Troso-Sandoval TA, Charen AS, Friedman C, Gorsky M, Schweber SJ, Middha S, Murali R, Chiang S, Park KJ, Soslow RA, Ladanyi M, Li BT, Mueller J, Weigelt B, Zehir A, Berger MF, Abu-Rustum NR, Aghajanian C, DeLair DF, Solit DB, Taylor BS, Hyman DM. Clinical Utility of Prospective Molecular Characterization in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:5939-5947. [PMID: 30068706 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced-stage endometrial cancers have limited treatment options and poor prognosis, highlighting the need to understand genetic drivers of therapeutic vulnerabilities and/or prognostic predictors. We examined whether prospective molecular characterization of recurrent and metastatic disease can reveal grade and histology-specific differences, facilitating enrollment onto clinical trials. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We integrated prospective clinical sequencing and IHC data with detailed clinical and treatment histories for 197 tumors, profiled by MSK-IMPACT from 189 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. RESULTS Patients had advanced disease and high-grade histologies, with poor progression-free survival on first-line therapy (PFS1). When matched for histology and grade, the genomic landscape was similar to that of primary untreated disease profiled by TCGA. Using multiple complementary genomic and mutational signature-based methods, we identified patients with microsatellite instability (MSI), even when standard MMR protein IHC staining failed. Tumor and matched normal DNA sequencing identified rare pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA2 and MLH1. Clustering the pattern of DNA copy-number alterations revealed a novel subset characterized by heterozygous losses across the genome and significantly worse outcomes compared with other clusters (median PFS1 9.6 months vs. 17.0 and 17.4 months; P = 0.006). Of the 68% of patients harboring potentially actionable mutations, 27% were enrolled to matched clinical trials, of which 47% of these achieved clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS Prospective clinical sequencing of advanced endometrial cancer can help refine prognosis and aid treatment decision making by simultaneously detecting microsatellite status, germline predisposition syndromes, and potentially actionable mutations. A small overall proportion of all patients tested received investigational, genomically matched therapy as part of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara E Soumerai
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark T A Donoghue
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Preethi Srinivasan
- Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew T Chang
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - William P Tew
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Jason A Konner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Paul Sabbatini
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - David R Spriggs
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Tiffany A Troso-Sandoval
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | | | - Claire Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Mila Gorsky
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Sarah J Schweber
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Middha
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bob T Li
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Mueller
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael F Berger
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Deborah F DeLair
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David B Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Barry S Taylor
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David M Hyman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
LaVigne K, Hyman DM, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Tew WP, Aghajanian C, Makker V, Hensley ML, Konner J, Grisham RN, Cangemi N, Soldan K, Spriggs DR, Sabbatini PJ, OʼCearbhaill RE. A Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Extended Carboplatin Infusion to Reduce Hypersensitivity Reactions in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:1176-1182. [PMID: 29757876 PMCID: PMC6033627 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hypersensitivity with repeated exposure to platinum agents is common and can preclude continued treatment, even in patients with disease that remains platinum sensitive. We sought to compare the effects of prophylactic, extended carboplatin infusion versus standard infusion on the rate of carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS This was a single-institution, randomized, nonblinded trial comparing a graded, 3-hour extended infusion of carboplatin with a standard 30-minute infusion in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were enrolled from January 2011 to April 2015. The study was designed to detect a decrease in the HSR rate from 20% (standard infusion) to 5% (extended infusion) assuming a type 1 error of 10% and power of 80% using a 1-sided test. RESULTS Of 146 enrolled patients, 114 were evaluable. Fifteen (13%) had an HSR-11% (6/56) in the extended-infusion and 16% (9/58) in the standard-infusion groups (P = 0.582). Planned treatment completion was achieved in 50 (89%) of 56 patients and 49 (84%) of 58 patients, respectively. Of 25 patients who received single-agent carboplatin, 8 (32%) had an HSR (53% of all patients who had an HSR [8/15]). Of 23 patients who received carboplatin with gemcitabine, 4 (17%) had an HSR (27% of all patients who had an HSR [4/15]). Of 8 patients who received carboplatin with paclitaxel, 3 (38%) had an HSR (20% of all patients who had an HSR [3/15]). There were no HSRs with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, the most commonly given concurrent chemotherapy (46% of all patients). CONCLUSIONS A prophylactic, extended carboplatin infusion was not associated with a decreased HSR rate. The overall low HSR rate suggests that premedication may help reduce HSRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qin C Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nicholas Cangemi
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Krysten Soldan
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lewis N, Soslow RA, Delair DF, Park KJ, Murali R, Hollmann TJ, Davidson B, Micci F, Panagopoulos I, Hoang LN, Arias-Stella JA, Oliva E, Young RH, Hensley ML, Leitao MM, Hameed M, Benayed R, Ladanyi M, Frosina D, Jungbluth AA, Antonescu CR, Chiang S. ZC3H7B-BCOR high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas: a report of 17 cases of a newly defined entity. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:674-684. [PMID: 29192652 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma likely encompasses underrecognized tumors harboring genetic abnormalities besides YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion. Triggered by three initial endometrial stromal sarcomas with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion characterized by high-grade morphology and aggressive clinical behavior, we herein investigate the clinicopathologic features of this genetic subset by expanding the analysis to 17 such tumors. All of them occurred in adult women with a median age of 54 (range, 28-71) years. They were predominantly based in the endomyometrium and demonstrated tongue-like and/or pushing myometrial invasion. Most were uniformly cellular and displayed haphazard fascicles of spindle cells with mild to moderate nuclear atypia. Myxoid matrix was seen in 14 of 17 (82%) tumors, and collagen plaques were seen in 8 (47%). The mitotic index was ≥10 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields (HPFs) in 14 of 17 (82%) tumors with a median of 14.5 mitotic figures/10 HPFs. No foci of conventional or variant low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma were seen. All tumors expressed CD10 with only limited or absent desmin, SMA and/or h-caldesmon staining. ER and PR expression in >5% of cells was seen in 4 of 12 (33%) tumors. Diffuse cyclin D1 and BCOR immunoreactivity was present in 7 of 8 (88%) and 7 of 14 (50%) tumors, respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization or targeted RNA sequencing confirmed ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion in all tumors, including four and two previously diagnosed as myxoid leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, respectively. Limited clinical data suggest that patients present at higher stage and have worse prognosis compared with published outcomes in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Tumors with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion constitute a distinct group of endometrial stromal sarcomas with high-grade morphology that should be distinguished from other uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that may demonstrate myxoid morphology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Lewis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah F Delair
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis J Hollmann
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ben Davidson
- Department of Pathology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Francesca Micci
- Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute of Cancer Genetics and Informatics, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ioannis Panagopoulos
- Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute of Cancer Genetics and Informatics, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lien N Hoang
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Esther Oliva
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert H Young
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Denise Frosina
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Achim A Jungbluth
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cristina R Antonescu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is one of the most common subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma in adults and can occur in almost any part of the body. Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common subtype of uterine sarcoma. Increased awareness of this unique histology has allowed for the development of drugs that are specific to LMS and has begun to shed light on the similarities and possible unique aspects of soft tissue and uterine LMS. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, genomics, and treatment options for LMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne George
- Suzanne George, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; César Serrano, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Centre Leon Berard and University Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - César Serrano
- Suzanne George, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; César Serrano, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Centre Leon Berard and University Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - Martee L. Hensley
- Suzanne George, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; César Serrano, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Centre Leon Berard and University Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Suzanne George, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; César Serrano, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Centre Leon Berard and University Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E. 66(th) Street, office 1355, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, 300 E. 66(th) Street, office 1355, New York, NY 10065.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chiang S, Lee CH, Stewart CJR, Oliva E, Hoang LN, Ali RH, Hensley ML, Arias-Stella JA, Frosina D, Jungbluth AA, Benayed R, Ladanyi M, Hameed M, Wang L, Kao YC, Antonescu CR, Soslow RA. BCOR is a robust diagnostic immunohistochemical marker of genetically diverse high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, including tumors exhibiting variant morphology. Mod Pathol 2017; 30:1251-1261. [PMID: 28621321 PMCID: PMC5916794 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Recognition of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is important because of its aggressive clinical behavior. Morphologic features of YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma may overlap with other uterine sarcoma types. BCOR immunoexpression was studied in these tumors and their morphologic mimics to assess its diagnostic utility. BCOR immunohistochemical staining was performed on archival tissue from 28 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with classic morphology (20 YWHAE-NUTM2, 5 ZC3H7B-BCOR, 3 BCOR-ZC3H7B), 3 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with unusual morphology and unknown gene rearrangement status, 66 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 21 endometrial stromal nodules, 38 uterine leiomyosarcomas, and 19 uterine leiomyomas. Intensity of nuclear staining and percentage of positive tumor cells were recorded. Strong diffuse nuclear BCOR staining (defined as >95% of tumor cells) was seen in the round cell component of all 20 (100%) classic YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and the 3 unusual high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas which prompted FISH studies confirming YWHAE rearrangement in 2 tumors. Genomic PCR confirmed the presence of BCOR exon 16 internal tandem duplication in the third case. Diffuse BCOR staining was strong in three and weak in one BCOR-rearranged high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma while absent in the remaining four BCOR-rearranged tumors. BCOR staining was weakly positive in <5% of tumor cells in 4 of 66 (6%) low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and 1 of 18 (6%) endometrial stromal nodules and weakly to moderately positive in <5-40% of tumor cells in 6 of 31 (19%) leiomyosarcomas. No BCOR staining was seen in the remaining low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, endometrial stromal nodules, leiomyosarcomas, or any of the leiomyomas. BCOR immunohistochemical staining is a highly sensitive marker for YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with both classic and unusual morphology and identifies a subset of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with BCOR alterations, including BCOR rearrangement and internal tandem duplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Colin J. R. Stewart
- Department of Pathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Esther Oliva
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lien N. Hoang
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rola H. Ali
- Department of Pathology, Kuwait University Health Sciences Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Martee L. Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Denise Frosina
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Achim A. Jungbluth
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yu-Chien Kao
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Robert A. Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hensley ML, Patel SR, von Mehren M, Ganjoo K, Jones RL, Staddon A, Rushing D, Milhem M, Monk B, Wang G, McCarthy S, Knoblauch RE, Parekh TV, Maki RG, Demetri GD. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy: Subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:531-537. [PMID: 28651804 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Revised: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Trabectedin demonstrated significantly improved disease control in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma patients in a global phase 3 trial (NCT01343277). A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), the largest subgroup of enrolled patients (40%). METHODS Of 577 patients randomized 2:1 to receive trabectedin 1.5mg/m2 by 24-hour IV infusion or dacarbazine 1g/m2 by 20-120-minute IV infusion once every three weeks, 232 had uLMS (trabectedin: 144; dacarbazine: 88). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: complete responses+partial responses+stable disease [SD] for at least 18weeks), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS PFS for trabectedin was 4.0months compared with 1.5months for dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.81; P=0.0012). OS was similar (trabectedin 13.4months vs. dacarbazine 12.9months, HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.65-1.24; P=0.51) between groups. ORR was 11% with trabectedin vs. 9% with dacarbazine (P=0.82). CBR for trabectedin was 31% vs. 18% with dacarbazine (P=0.05); median DOR was 6.5months for trabectedin vs. 4.1months for dacarbazine (P=0.32). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events observed in ≥10% of patients in the trabectedin group included transient aminotransferase (aspartate/alanine) elevations, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS In this post hoc subset analysis of patients with uLMS who had received prior anthracycline therapy, trabectedin treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS versus dacarbazine, with an acceptable safety profile. There was no difference in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Robin L Jones
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Daniel Rushing
- Indiana University, Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Mohammed Milhem
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Bradley Monk
- St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - George Wang
- Janssen Research & Development LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - George D Demetri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mai PL, Piedmonte M, Han PK, Moser RP, Walker JL, Rodriguez G, Boggess J, Rutherford TJ, Zivanovic O, Cohn DE, Thigpen JT, Wenham RM, Friedlander ML, Hamilton CA, Bakkum-Gamez J, Olawaiye AB, Hensley ML, Greene MH, Huang HQ, Wenzel L. Factors associated with deciding between risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening among high-risk women enrolled in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 145:122-129. [PMID: 28190649 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer (OC) are recommended to have risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) after completion of reproductive planning. Effective screening has not been established, and novel screening modalities are being evaluated. METHODS Participants chose either RRSO or a novel OC screening regimen (OCS) as their risk management option, and provided demographic and other data on BRCA mutation status, cancer worry, perceived intervention risks/benefits, perceived cancer risk, and quality-of-life at enrollment. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate factors influencing decision between RRSO and OCS. RESULTS Of 2287 participants enrolled, 904 (40%) chose RRSO and 1383 (60%) chose OCS. Compared with participants choosing OCS, participants choosing RRSO were older (p<0.0001), more likely to carry deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations (p<0.0001), perceive RRSO as effective, be more concerned about surgical harms and OCS limitations, and report higher perceived OC risk and OC-related worry. OCS participants were more likely to perceive screening as effective, be more concerned about menopausal symptoms, infertility, and loss of femininity, and report better overall quality-of-life. Twenty-four percent of participants believed they would definitely develop OC, and half estimated their lifetime OC risk as >50%, both higher than objective risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS Cancer worry, BRCA1/2 mutation status, and perceived intervention-related risks and benefits were associated with choosing between RRSO and OCS. Efforts to promote individualized, evidence-based, shared medical decision-making among high-risk women facing management choices should focus on conveying accurate OC risk estimates, clarifying the current understanding of intervention-related benefits and limitations, and addressing OC worry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong L Mai
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852-9772, United States.
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- NRG Oncology, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
| | - Paul K Han
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME 04101, United States.
| | - Richard P Moser
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, United States.
| | - Joan L Walker
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
| | - Gustavo Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, United States.
| | - John Boggess
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States.
| | - Thomas J Rutherford
- Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Innovative Surgical Technology, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10022, United States.
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.
| | - J Tate Thigpen
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, United States.
| | - Robert M Wenham
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Program of Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
| | | | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, United States.
| | - Jamie Bakkum-Gamez
- Department of GYN Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
| | - Alexander B Olawaiye
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15143, United States.
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852-9772, United States.
| | - Helen Q Huang
- NRG Oncology, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
| | - Lari Wenzel
- Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
St Clair CM, Eriksson AGZ, Ducie JA, Jewell EL, Alektiar KM, Hensley ML, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM. Low-Volume Lymph Node Metastasis Discovered During Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:1653-9. [PMID: 26714954 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5040-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to characterize treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes in patients with low-volume lymph node metastasis (isolated tumor cells [ITCs] and micrometastasis [MM]) discovered during sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for endometrial carcinoma. METHODS We identified endometrial cancer cases treated surgically from September 2005 to April 2013 in which SLN mapping was performed. MM was defined as tumor within a lymph node measuring >0.2 mm but <2.0 mm, and ITCs were those measuring ≤0.2 mm. RESULTS Overall, 844 patients, with a median age of 61 years (range 30-90), met the inclusion criteria. Histology was as follows: endometrioid, 724 (85.8 %) patients; serous, 104 (12.3 %) patients; and clear cell, 16 (1.9 %) patients. The median number of lymph nodes resected was six (range 0-60), and the median number of SLNs was two (range 0-15). Overall, 753 (89.2 %) patients were node-negative, 23 (2.7 %) had ITCs only, 21 (2.5 %) had MM only, and 47 (5.6 %) had macrometastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 106 (14 %) of 753 node-negative patients, 19 (83 %) of 23 patients with ITCs, 17 (81 %) of 21 patients with MM, and 42 (89 %) of 47 with macrometastasis. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 0-108). Three-year recurrence-free survival was as follows: node-negative patients, 90 % (±1.5); ITCs only, 86 % (±9.4); MM only, 86 % (±9.7); and macrometastasis, 71 % (±7.2) [p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Patients with ITCs and MM frequently received adjuvant chemotherapy and had improved oncologic outcomes in comparison to those with macrometastasis to the lymph nodes. Further prospective study is needed to determine optimal post-resection management in patients with ITCs or MM alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn M St Clair
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ane Gerda Z Eriksson
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer A Ducie
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Barlin JN, Zhou QC, Leitao MM, Bisogna M, Olvera N, Shih KK, Jacobsen A, Schultz N, Tap WD, Hensley ML, Schwartz GK, Boyd J, Qin LX, Levine DA. Molecular subtypes of uterine leiomyosarcoma and correlation with clinical outcome. Neoplasia 2015; 17:183-9. [PMID: 25748237 PMCID: PMC4351299 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The molecular etiology of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is poorly understood, which accounts for the wide disparity in outcomes among women with this disease. We examined and compared the molecular profiles of ULMS and normal myometrium (NL) to identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes. Discovery cases included 29 NL and 23 ULMS specimens. RNA was hybridized to Affymetrix U133A 2.0 transcription microarrays. Differentially expressed genes and pathways were identified using standard methods. Fourteen NL and 44 ULMS independent archival samples were used for external validation. Molecular subgroups were correlated with clinical outcome. Pathway analyses of differentially expressed genes between ULMS and NL samples identified overrepresentation of cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and genomic integrity. External validation confirmed differential expression in 31 genes (P < 4.4 × 10(-4), Bonferroni corrected), with 84% of the overexpressed genes, including CDC7, CDC20, GTSE1, CCNA2, CCNB1, and CCNB2, participating in cell cycle regulation. Unsupervised clustering of ULMS identified two clades that were reproducibly associated with progression-free (median, 4.0 vs 26.0 months; P = .02; HR, 0.33) and overall (median, 18.2 vs 77.2 months; P = .04; HR, 0.33) survival. Cell cycle genes play a key role in ULMS sarcomagenesis, providing opportunities for therapeutic targeting. Reproducible molecular subtypes associated with clinical outcome may permit individualized adjuvant treatment after clinical trial validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce N Barlin
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Bisogna
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Narciso Olvera
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karin K Shih
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anders Jacobsen
- Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William D Tap
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gary K Schwartz
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeff Boyd
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L. Hensley
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Jones RL, Hensley ML, Schuetze SM, Staddon A, Milhem M, Elias A, Ganjoo K, Tawbi H, Van Tine BA, Spira A, Dean A, Khokhar NZ, Park YC, Knoblauch RE, Parekh TV, Maki RG, Patel SR. Efficacy and Safety of Trabectedin or Dacarbazine for Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma After Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:786-93. [PMID: 26371143 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.4734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 552] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This multicenter study, to our knowledge, is the first phase III trial to compare trabectedin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after prior therapy with an anthracycline and at least one additional systemic regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trabectedin or dacarbazine intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were disease control-progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, objective response rate, and duration of response-as well as safety and patient-reported symptom scoring. RESULTS A total of 518 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either trabectedin (n = 345) or dacarbazine (n = 173). In the final analysis of PFS, trabectedin administration resulted in a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with dacarbazine (median PFS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 4.2 v 1.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; P < .001); benefits were observed across all preplanned subgroup analyses. The interim analysis of OS (64% censored) demonstrated a 13% reduction in risk of death in the trabectedin arm compared with dacarbazine (median OS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 12.4 v 12.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.87; P = .37). The safety profiles were consistent with the well-characterized toxicities of both agents, and the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were myelosuppression and transient elevation of transaminases in the trabectedin arm. CONCLUSION Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control versus conventional dacarbazine in patients who have advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma after they experience failure of prior chemotherapy. Because disease control in advanced sarcomas is a clinically relevant end point, this study supports the activity of trabectedin for patients with these malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George D Demetri
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Margaret von Mehren
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robin L Jones
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Martee L Hensley
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott M Schuetze
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Arthur Staddon
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mohammed Milhem
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anthony Elias
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kristen Ganjoo
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian A Van Tine
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alexander Spira
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andrew Dean
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nushmia Z Khokhar
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Youn Choi Park
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Roland E Knoblauch
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Trilok V Parekh
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert G Maki
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shreyaskumar R Patel
- George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hensley ML, Miller A, O'Malley DM, Mannel RS, Behbakht K, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Michael H. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel plus bevacizumab or placebo as first-line treatment for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1180-5. [PMID: 25713428 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.3781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel achieves objective response in 35% of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). This study aimed to determine whether the addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-docetaxel increases progression-free survival (PFS) in uLMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, unresectable uLMS were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab or gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo. PFS, overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORRs) were compared to determine superiority. Target accrual was 130 patients to detect an increase in median PFS from 4 months (gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo) to 6.7 months (gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab). Treatment effects on PFS and OS were described by hazard ratios (HRs), median times to event, and 95% CIs. RESULTS In all, 107 patients were accrued: gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo (n = 54) and gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (n = 53). Accrual was stopped early for futility. No statistically significant differences in grade 3 to 4 toxicities were observed. Median PFS was 6.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo versus 4.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.12; P = .58). Median OS was 26.9 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo and 23.3 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.07; P = .81). Objective responses were observed in 17 (31.5%) of 54 patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo and 19 (35.8%) of 53 patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab. Mean duration of response was 8.6 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo versus 8.8 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-docetaxel for first-line treatment of metastatic uLMS failed to improve PFS, OS, or ORR. Gemcitabine-docetaxel remains a standard first-line treatment for uLMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L Hensley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| | - Austin Miller
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - David M O'Malley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Robert S Mannel
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Kian Behbakht
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Helen Michael
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Austin Miller, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, NY; David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Robert S. Mannel, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Kian Behbakht, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Helen Michael, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Campos SM, Brady WE, Moxley KM, O'Cearbhaill RE, Lee PS, DiSilvestro PA, Rotmensch J, Rose P, Thaker PH, O'Malley DM, ParvizHanjani, Zuna RE, Hensley ML. Corrigendum to: A phase II evaluation of Pazopanib in the treatment of recurrent or persistent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [Gynecol Oncol 133 (2014) 537–541]. Gynecol Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
43
|
Campos SM, Brady WE, Moxley KM, O'Cearbhaill RE, Lee PS, DiSilvestro PA, Rotmensch J, Rose PG, Thaker PH, O'Malley DM, Hanjani P, Zuna RE, Hensley ML. A phase II evaluation of pazopanib in the treatment of recurrent or persistent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 133:537-41. [PMID: 24594074 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2014] [Revised: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract, also called malignant mixed müllerian tumors, are aggressive biphasic tumors. Second-line treatment options in the recurrent/persistent setting have yielded marginal responses. Given the potential role of angiogenesis in the gynecological carcinomas, pazopanib, a VEGFR inhibitor, was investigated in the management of patients with recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus. METHODS Eligible patients had histologically confirmed carcinosarcoma of the uterus, a maximum of two prior lines of therapy, adequate renal, hepatic and hematologic function and a performance status of 0-2. Pazopanib was administered orally at 800mg. Two dose reductions were allowed. The primary objective was to ascertain the activity of pazopanib as measured by the proportion of patients who survive progression-free for at least six months and the proportion of patients that have objective tumor responses. Secondary objectives included the frequency and severity of adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS Of the 22 enrolled patients, 19 were eligible and evaluable for toxicity and survival. No patients had a partial or complete response (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0%, 14.6%). Three patients (15.8%) had PFS ≥6months (90% CI: 4.4%, 35.9%). The median PFS was 2.0months (first and third quartiles were 1.6 and 4.0months, respectively). The median overall survival was 8.7months (first and third quartiles were 2.6 and 14.0months, respectively). CONCLUSION Pazopanib demonstrated minimal activity as a second or third line treatment for advanced uterine carcinosarcoma. Potential clinical trial participation should be discussed with the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana M Campos
- Dana-Farber Partners Cancer Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - William E Brady
- Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | | | | | - Paula S Lee
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Jacob Rotmensch
- Rush-Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | | | - Premal H Thaker
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Ohio State University, Columbus Cancer Council, Hilliard, OH 43026, USA
| | | | - Rosemary E Zuna
- University of Oklahoma Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hyman DM, Eaton AA, Gounder MM, Smith GL, Pamer EG, Hensley ML, Spriggs DR, Ivy P, Iasonos A. Nomogram to predict cycle-one serious drug-related toxicity in phase I oncology trials. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:519-26. [PMID: 24419130 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.8808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE All patients in phase I trials do not have equivalent susceptibility to serious drug-related toxicity (SDRT). Our goal was to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of cycle-one SDRT to better select appropriate patients for phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS The prospectively maintained database of patients with solid tumor enrolled onto Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials activated between 2000 and 2010 was used. SDRT was defined as a grade ≥ 4 hematologic or grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity attributed, at least possibly, to study drug(s). Logistic regression was used to test the association of candidate factors to cycle-one SDRT. A final model, or nomogram, was chosen based on both clinical and statistical significance and validated internally using a bootstrapping technique and externally in an independent data set. RESULTS Data from 3,104 patients enrolled onto 127 trials were analyzed to build the nomogram. In a model with multiple covariates, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, WBC count, creatinine clearance, albumin, AST, number of study drugs, biologic study drug (yes v no), and dose (relative to maximum administered) were significant predictors of cycle-one SDRT. All significant factors except dose were included in the final nomogram. The model was validated both internally (bootstrap-adjusted concordance index, 0.60) and externally (concordance index, 0.64). CONCLUSION This nomogram can be used to accurately predict a patient's risk for SDRT at the time of enrollment. Excluding patients at high risk for SDRT should improve the safety and efficiency of phase I trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Hyman
- David M. Hyman, Anne A. Eaton, Mrinal M. Gounder, Erika G. Pamer, Martee L. Hensley, David R. Spriggs, and Alexia Iasonos, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; David M. Hyman, Mrinal M. Gounder, Martee L. Hensley, David R. Spriggs, and Alexia Iasonos, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Gary L. Smith and Percy Ivy, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barlin JN, Zhou Q, St Clair CM, Iasonos A, Soslow RA, Alektiar KM, Hensley ML, Leitao MM, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis of endometrial carcinoma: Seeing the forest for the trees. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:452-6. [PMID: 23774300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of the study are to evaluate which clinicopathologic factors influenced overall survival (OS) in endometrial carcinoma and to determine if the surgical effort to assess para-aortic (PA) lymph nodes (LNs) at initial staging surgery impacts OS. METHODS All patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 1/1993-12/2011 who had LNs excised were included. PALN assessment was defined by the identification of one or more PALNs on final pathology. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the effect of PALNs on OS. A form of recursive partitioning called classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was implemented. Variables included: age, stage, tumor subtype, grade, myometrial invasion, total LNs removed, evaluation of PALNs, and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS The cohort included 1920 patients, with a median age of 62 years. The median number of LNs removed was 16 (range, 1-99). The removal of PALNs was not associated with OS (P=0.450). Using the CART hierarchically, stage I vs. stages II-IV and grades 1-2 vs. grade 3 emerged as predictors of OS. If the tree was allowed to grow, further branching was based on age and myometrial invasion. Total number of LNs removed and assessment of PALNs as defined in this study were not predictive of OS. CONCLUSION This innovative CART analysis emphasized the importance of proper stage assignment and a binary grading system in impacting OS. Notably, the total number of LNs removed and specific evaluation of PALNs as defined in this study were not important predictors of OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce N Barlin
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Iasonos A, Keung EZ, Zivanovic O, Mancari R, Peiretti M, Nucci M, George S, Colombo N, Carinelli S, Hensley ML, Raut CP. External validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Cancer 2013; 119:1816-22. [PMID: 23456762 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2012] [Revised: 11/23/2012] [Accepted: 12/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no validated system to identify prognostically distinct cohorts of women with uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS). By using an independent, pooled, multi-institutional, international patient cohort, the authors validated a recently proposed ULMS nomogram. METHODS The ULMS nomogram incorporated 7 clinical characteristics (age, tumor size, tumor grade, cervical involvement, locoregional metastases, distant metastases, and mitotic index (per 10 high-power fields) to predict overall survival (OS) after primary surgery. Independent cohorts from 2 sarcoma centers were included. Eligible women, at minimum, underwent a hysterectomy for primary, locally advanced, or metastatic ULMS and received part of their care at 1 of the centers between 1994 and 2010. RESULTS In total, 187 women with ULMS were identified who met the above criteria described above (median age, 51 years; median tumor size, 9 cm; median mitotic index, 20 per 10 high-power fields). Tumors generally were high grade (88%), FIGO stage I or II (61%) without cervical involvement (93%) and without locoregional metastases (77%) or distant metastases (83%). The median OS and the 5-year OS rate were 4.5 years (95% confidence interval, 3.2-5.3 years) and 46%, respectively; and 65 women (35%) remained alive at last follow-up. The nomogram concordance index was 0.67(standard error, 0.02), which was as high as the concordance index from the initial cohort used for nomogram development. The concordance between actual OS and nomogram predictions suggests excellent calibration because predictions were within 1% of actual 5-year OS rates for patients with a predicted 5-year OS of less than 0.68. CONCLUSIONS The ULMS nomogram was externally validated using independent cohorts. These findings support the international use of the ULMS nomogram prognostic of OS in ULMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hensley ML, Wathen JK, Maki RG, Araujo DM, Sutton G, Priebat DA, George S, Soslow RA, Baker LH. Adjuvant therapy for high-grade, uterus-limited leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase 2 trial (SARC 005). Cancer 2013; 119:1555-61. [PMID: 23335221 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2012] [Revised: 11/12/2012] [Accepted: 11/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 30% and 50% of women who have high-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) limited to the uterus at diagnosis remain progression-free at 2 years. Adjuvant pelvic radiation does not improve outcome. The objective of the current study was to determine the 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) among a prospective cohort of women who received adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel followed by doxorubicin. METHODS Women with uterus-limited, high-grade uLMS and adequate organ function were eligible. Within 12 weeks of complete resection and after confirmation that they had no evidence of disease on computed tomography (CT) images, the patients received 4 cycles of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel. Those who were confirmed disease-free on CT scans after cycle 4 received 4 cycles of doxorubicin. CT imaging for recurrence was performed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years. RESULTS In total, 47 women were enrolled (46 evaluable) in 3 years. Characteristics included a median age of 53 years; 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I disease in 81% of patients, stage II disease in 15%, and serosa-only stage IIIA disease in 4%; American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II disease in 13% of patients and stage III disease in 87%; a median tumor size of 8 cm (range, 2.5-30 cm); and a median mitotic rate of 18 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (range, 5-83 mitoses per 10 high-power fields). At a median follow-up of 39.8 months, 21 of 46 patients developed recurrent disease (45.7%). The median time to recurrence was 27.4 months (range, 3-40 months). Seventy-eight percent of patients (95% confidence interval, 67%-91%) were progression-free at 2 years, and 57% (95% confidence interval, 44%-74%) were progression-free at 3 years. The median PFS was not reached and exceeded 36 months. CONCLUSIONS Among women with high-grade, uterus-limited uLMS who received treatment with adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel followed by doxorubicin, 78% remained progression-free at 2 years, and 57% remained progression-free at 3 years. A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival in women with uterus-limited uLMS is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L Hensley
- Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tanner EJ, Toussaint T, Leitao MM, Hensley ML, Soslow RA, Gardner GJ, Jewell EL. Management of uterine adenosarcomas with and without sarcomatous overgrowth. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 129:140-4. [PMID: 23283300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2012] [Revised: 12/20/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Uterine adenosarcomas (AS) are rare tumors composed of malignant stromal and benign epithelial components. We sought to evaluate the role of primary surgery, adjuvant treatments, and salvage therapies for patients with uterine adenosarcomas. METHODS We identified all patients diagnosed with AS from 1990 to 2009 at our institution. Patient demographics, surgical procedures, sites of metastatic disease, and histologic features (e.g., presence of sarcomatous overgrowth, and heterologous elements) were collected. Treatment regimens and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were evaluable for this study: 19 (61%) received up-front treatment at our institution and 12 (39%) received treatment for recurrent disease. Most of the up-front treated patients (15, 79%) were diagnosed with stage I disease and underwent hysterectomy (100%) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (84%). Of the 19 patients treated at our institution from time of initial diagnosis, 5 (26%) patients recurred (median follow-up, 72.9 months; range, 3-154). In 5 patients with sarcomatous overgrowth (AS+SO), the 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were both 20% versus 100% for 14 patients without sarcomatous overgrowth. Responses to systemic treatment of measurable disease were observed in patients with and without sarcomatous overgrowth, but no optimal treatment strategy could be identified for either groups. CONCLUSIONS Unlike AS without sarcomatous overgrowth, AS+SO is an aggressive disease with a high recurrence rate. In our series, no optimal adjuvant or systemic treatment strategy was identifiable but standard sarcoma chemotherapy regimens appear to have efficacy in both AS and AS+SO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Tanner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Konner J, Grisham RN, Park J, O’Connor OA, Cropp G, Johnson R, Hannah AL, Hensley ML, Sabbatini P, Mironov S, Danishefsky S, Hyman D, Spriggs DR, Dupont J, Aghajanian C. Erratum to: Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of KOS-862 (Epothilone D) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s10637-011-9780-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
50
|
Konner J, Grisham RN, Park J, O'Connor OA, Cropp G, Johnson R, Hannah AL, Hensley ML, Sabbatini P, Mironov S, Miranov S, Danishefsky S, Hyman D, Spriggs DR, Dupont J, Aghajanian C. Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of KOS-862 (Epothilone D) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 2012; 30:2294-302. [PMID: 22072399 PMCID: PMC4003559 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-011-9765-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2011] [Accepted: 10/19/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the maximum tolerated dose and safety of the epothilone, KOS-862, in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks (Schedule A) or 2 out of 3 weeks (Schedule B) with KOS-862 (16-120 mg/m(2)). Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed during cycles 1 and 2; pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment for microtubule bundle formation (MTBF) was performed after the 1st dose, only at or above 100 mg/m(2). RESULTS Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and twenty-nine completed ≥1 cycle of therapy. Dose limiting toxicity [DLT] was observed at 120 mg/m(2). PK data were linear from 16 to 100 mg/m(2), with proportional increases in mean C(max) and AUC(tot) as a function of dose. Full PK analysis (mean ± SD) at 100 mg/m(2) revealed the following: half-life (t (½)) = 9.1 ± 2.2 h; volume of distribution (V(z)) = 119 ± 41 L/m(2); clearance (CL) = 9.3 ± 3.2 L/h/m(2). MTBF (n = 9) was seen in 40% of PBMCs within 1 h and in 15% of PBMC at 24-hours post infusion at 100 mg/m(2). Tumor shrinkage (n = 2, lymphoma), stable disease >3 months (n = 5, renal, prostate, oropharynx, cholangiocarcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma), and tumor marker reductions (n = 1, colorectal cancer/CEA) were observed. CONCLUSION KOS-862 was well tolerated with manageable toxicity, favorable PK profile, and the suggestion of clinical activity. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 100 mg/m(2) weekly 3-on/1-off. MTBF can be demonstrated in PBMCs of patients exposed to KOS-862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Konner
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|