The clinical significance of variant-morphology small-cell carcinoma of the lung

Combined SCLC clinical and pathologic characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Despite the well characterized clinical course of 'pure' SCLC, there have not been many data on combined SCLC, ie, tumors, which contain both small-cell and non-small-cell components.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 1628 consecutive cases of lung cancer (1200 NSCLC, 428 SCLC) at our institution over the past decade. We identified 22 patients with C-SCLC. The pathologic and clinical characteristics of these patients were reviewed. Survival analysis was performed and prognostic factors were assessed. These data were compared with the results obtained from our 406 pure SCLC patients who presented during the same time period.

RESULTS

The most common pathology was combined small-cell and large-cell with 16 cases followed by combined small- and squamous-cell carcinoma (3 cases), 2 cases of small-cell and nonspecified NSCLC, and 1 case of small cell and adenocarcinoma. Overall survival was significantly higher in C-SCLC patients compared with pure SCLC (median 15 vs. 10.8 months; P = .035). Surgery was significantly more common in this group of patients (45% vs. 3% in the pure small cell group; P < .0001). No difference in overall survival was observed in patients with C-SCLC and patients with pure SCLC, that did not receive surgery (P = .64).

CONCLUSION

Patients with combined SCLC carry a better prognosis than those with pure small-cell variety and are more likely to undergo surgery.

New advances in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.K., with small cell histology accounting for 15%-20% of cases. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is initially a chemosensitive disease, but relapse is common, and in this group of patients it remains a rapidly lethal disease with a particularly poor prognosis. The choice of second-line chemotherapy for patients with relapsed SCLC has been an area of difficulty for oncologists, and until recently there was no randomized evidence for its use over best supportive care (BSC). Topotecan is currently the only drug licensed in Europe and the U.S. for this indication, having been shown in a phase III trial to lead to longer overall survival and better quality of life than with BSC. In this article, we review the current evidence for the use of second-line cytotoxic therapy and also the emerging role of novel agents and targeted therapies in this setting. In particular, we explore the role of the Bcl-2 protein family, which are key regulators of mitochondrial apoptosis and are implicated in resistance to anticancer therapies. SCLC overexpresses antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family in approximately 80% of cases. Several Bcl-2 inhibitors, including obatoclax, are currently entering clinical trials in SCLC and are an exciting area of drug development in the relapsed setting.

The role of PKCα and RLIP76 in transport-mediated doxorubicin-resistance in lung cancer

In deletion mutant analyses of potential phosphorylation sites in RLIP76, we identified T297 and S509 as targets for phosphorylation by PKCalpha. Phosphorylation at T297 increased doxorubicin (DOX)-transport activity approximately 2-fold for RLIP76 purified from recombinant source, or from three small (H69, H1417, H1618) and three non-small cell, one each derived from H226 (squamous), H358 (bronchio alveolar), and H1395 (adenocarcinoma) lung cancer cell lines. T297 phosphorylation conferred sensitivity to tryptic digestion at R293. The specific activity for DOX-transport by RLIP76 purified from non-small cell, which was primarily in the phosphorylated form, was approximately twice that in small cell lung cancer cell lines. These finding offer a novel explanation for the observed intrinsic differences in sensitivity to DOX between non-small cell and small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): a clinicopathologic study of 100 cases with surgical specimens

Separation of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) from nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a critical distinction to be made in the diagnosis of lung cancer. However, the diagnosis of SCLC is most commonly made on small biopsies and cytologic specimens, and practicing pathologists may not be familiar with all its morphologic guises and frequent combination with NSCLC elements, which may be seen in larger specimens. Following the most recent WHO classification of lung tumors and with the hope of identifying prognostic markers, we examined in detail the histology of 100 surgical biopsies or resections with a diagnosis of SCLC from the AFIP and pathology panel of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Multiple clinical and histologic features were studied by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Neuroendocrine architectural patterns, including nested and trabecular growth, with peripheral palisading and rosette formation were common in SCLC. Necrosis and apoptotic debris was prominent in all cases, but crush artifact was infrequent. Cell size in surgical biopsy specimens appears larger than in bronchoscopic biopsy specimens and occasional cells may show prominent nucleoli and vesicular nuclear chromatin, but this does not preclude the diagnosis of SCLC. A high percentage of cases (28%) showed combinations with NSCLC, with large cell carcinoma the most common, followed by adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Because of the frequency of a few scattered large cells in SCLC, we arbitrarily recommend that at least 10% of the tumor show large cell carcinoma before subclassification as combined SC/LC. However, combined SCLC is easily recognized if the additional component consists of other NSCLC subtypes such as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, so no percentage requirement is needed. Stage remained the only predictor of prognosis.

A review of cytologic findings in neuroendocrine carcinomas including carcinoid tumors with histologic correlation

BACKGROUND

The nosology of neuroendocrine neoplasia has evolved substantially in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the authors' institutional experience and diagnostic accuracy for cytologic specimens of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and to identify features most suggestive of neuroendocrine differentiation.

METHODS

The cytologic and histologic findings of 29 archival NEC in which cytology preceded biopsy or resection were compared. The study was comprised of 6 carcinoid tumors, 3 atypical carcinoid tumors, 17 high grade NEC (5 small cell, 9 large cell, and 3 mixed small/large cell), and 3 combined NEC/nonneuroendocrine carcinomas. Cytologic material was derived from 21 fine-needle aspirates (FNA), 6 bronchial brushing/washings, and 2 gastrointestinal tract brushings.

RESULTS

Of the 29 cases, the correct cytologic diagnosis was rendered in 11. Two cases were identified as NEC but were graded incorrectly. The remaining 16 cases were interpreted as nonsmall cell carcinoma (8 cases); diagnostic or suspicious of carcinoma, not otherwise specified (7 cases); and atypical, indeterminate for malignancy (1 case). On review, neuroendocrine features were identified in 14 of the latter 16 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytologic diagnosis of NEC, both high and low grade, can be difficult. Because of acinus-like formations and columnar cell shapes, low grade NEC may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Small cell carcinomas, especially in bronchial brush and wash preparations, may be difficult to classify beyond malignant. Large cell NEC may be confused with nonneuroendocrine carcinomas because of abundant cytoplasm and nucleoli. Attention to the presence of loose cell aggregates in a background of singly dispersed cells; feathery patterns created by tumor cells clinging to capillaries; rosette formations; delicate, granular cytoplasm; inconspicuous nucleoli; molding in high grade tumors; and, most important, speckled or dusty chromatin patterns are useful in identifying neuroendocrine differentiation in cytologic specimens.

Gene regulation of vasopressin and vasopressin receptors in cancer

It is proposed that neuropeptide production by tumours is an important part of a special process of oncogenic transformation rather than a pre-existing condition of progenitor cells; this concept is called Selective Tumour gene Expression of Peptides essential for Survival (STEPS). All small-cell lung cancers and breast cancers evidently express the vasopressin gene, and this gene seems to be structurally normal in all but exceptional cases. Vasopressin gene expression in cancer cells leads to the production of both normal and abnormal forms of tumour vasopressin mRNA and proteins. Although the necessary post-translational processing enzymes are expressed in these cells, most processing seems to be extragranular, and most of the protein products become components of the plasma membrane. Small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer cells also express normal genes for all vasopressin receptors and produce normal vasopressin receptor mRNAs and V1a and V1b receptor proteins, and the vasopressin-activated calcium mobilising (VACM) protein; plus both normal and abnormal forms of the V2 receptor. Through these receptors, vasopressin exercises multifaceted effects on tumour growth and metabolism. A normal protein vasopressin gene promoter seems to be present in small-cell lung cancer cells, and this promoter contains all of the transcriptional elements known to be involved in gene regulation within hypothalamic neurones. Since these elements largely account for regulation of tumour gene expression observed in vitro, it is likely that as yet unknown factors are selectively produced by tumours in vivo to account for the observed seemingly autonomous or unregulated production of hormone in tumour patients. Promoter elements thought to be responsible for selective vasopressin gene expression in small-cell lung cancer probably include an E-box and a neurone restrictive silencer element close to the transcription start site. It is possible that transcription factors acting at these same elements can explain selective vasopressin expression, not only in small-cell tumours, but also in all other tumours such as breast cancer. By extrapolation, similar mechanisms might also be responsible for the expression of additional features that characterize the 'neuroendocrine' profile of these cancers.

Reproducibility of neuroendocrine lung tumor classification

For a tumor classification scheme to be useful, it must be reproducible and it must show clinical significance. Classification of neuroendocrine lung tumors is a difficult problem with little information about interobserver reproducibility. We sought to evaluate the classification of typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and small-cell carcinoma (SCC) tumors as proposed by W.D. Travis et al (Am J Surg Pathol 15:529, 1991). Forty neuroendocrine tumors were retrieved from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) files and independently evaluated by five lung pathologists and classified as TC, AC, LCNEC, or SCC (pure SCC, mixed small cell/large cell, and combined SCC). A single hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide from each case was reviewed. Each participant was provided a set of tables summarizing the criteria for separation of the four major categories. Agreement was regarded as unanimous if all five pathologists agreed, a majority if four agreed, and a consensus if three or more pathologists agreed. The kappa statistic was calculated to measure the degree of agreement between two observers. A consensus diagnosis was achieved in all 40 cases (100%), a majority agreement in 31 of 40 (78%), and unanimous agreement in 22 of 40 (55%) of cases. Unanimous agreement occurred in seven of SCC (70%), seven of TC (58%), four of AC (50%), and four of LCNEC (40%). A majority diagnosis was achieved in 11 of 12 (92%) of TC, 9 of 10 (90%) of SCC, 6 of 8 (75%) of AC, and 5 of 10 (50%) of LCNEC. Most of the kappa values were 0.70 or greater, falling into the substantial agreement category. The most common disagreements fell between LCNEC and SCC, followed by TC and AC, and AC and LCNEC. The highest reproducibility occurred for SCC and TC, with disagreement in 8% and 10% of the diagnoses, respectively. For TC, 10% of the diagnoses rendered were AC. For AC, 15% of the diagnoses were rendered as TC, with 2.5% called LCNEC and 2.5% called SCC. For LCNEC, 18% and 4% of the diagnoses were called SCC and AC, respectively. For SCC, 4% of the diagnoses were called AC and 4% were called LCNEC. Thus, using the classification scheme tested, a consensus diagnosis can be achieved for virtually all neuroendocrine lung tumors with substantial agreement between experienced lung pathologists. Classification of NE tumors is most reproducible for classification of TC and SCC but less reproducible for AC and LCNEC. These results indicate a need for more careful definition and application of criteria for TC versus AC and SCC versus LCNEC.

Molecular events in lung cancer

The observation that genes contributing to the process of malignant transformation are altered forms of genes normally present in eukaryotic cells initiated many of the advances that have increased our understanding of lung carcinogenesis at the molecular level. The gene families implicated in carcinogenesis include dominant oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Proto-oncogenes (normal homologue of the oncogene) participate in critical cell functions, including signal transduction and transcription. Only a single mutant allele is required for malignant transformation. Primary modifications in the dominant oncogenes that confer gain of transforming function include point mutations, amplification, translocations, and rearrangements. A second recently described gene family is the tumor suppressor genes. Tumor suppressor genes appear to require homozygous loss of function either by mutation, deletion, or a combination of these. Some tumor suppressor genes appear to play a role in the governance of proliferation by regulation of transcription. The identification of specific genes that contribute to the development of the cancer cell presents an opportunity to use these genes and their products as prevention and treatment targets.

Small cell lung cancer: etiology, biology, clinical features, staging, and treatment

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of all bronchogenic carcinoma and is associated with the poorest 5-year survival of all histologic types. SCLC differs in its etiologic, pathologic, biologic, and clinical features from non-SCLC, and these differences have translated to distinct approaches to its prevention and treatment. Compared with other histologic types of lung cancer, exposures to tobacco smoke, ionizing radiation, and chloromethyl ethers pose a substantially greater risk for development of SCLC. The histologic classification of SCLC has been revised to include three categories: (1) small cell carcinoma, (2) mixed small cell/large cell, and (3) combined small cell carcinoma. Ultrastructurally, SCLC displays a number of neuroendocrine features in common with pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, including dense core vesicles or neurosecretory granules. These dense core vesicles are associated with a variety of secretory products, cell surface antigens, and enzymes. The biology of SCLC is complex. The activation of a number of dominant proto-oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in SCLC have been described. Dominant proto-oncogenes that have been found to be amplified or overexpressed in SCLC include the myc family, c-myb, c-kit, c-jun, and c-src. Altered expression of two tumor suppressor genes in SCLC, p53 and the retinoblastoma gene product, has been demonstrated. Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for chromosomal loss of 3p, 5q, 9p, 11p, 13q, and 17p in SCLC has intensified the search for other tumor suppressor genes with potential import in this malignancy. Bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide, insulin-like growth factor I, and transferrin have been identified as autocrine growth factors in SCLC, with a number of other peptides under active investigation. Several mechanisms of drug resistance in SCLC have been described, including gene amplification, the recently described overexpression of multi-drug resistance-related protein (MRP), and the expression of P-glycoprotein. The classic SCLC staging system has been supplanted by a revised TNM staging system where limited disease and extensive disease are equivalent to the TNM stages I through III and stage IV, respectively. Therapeutically, recent strategies have attained small improvements in survival but significant reductions in the toxicities of chemotherapeutic regimens. Presently, the overall 5-year survival for SCLC is 5% to 10%, with limited disease associated with a significantly higher survival rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Detection of large cell component in small cell lung carcinoma by combined cytologic and histologic examinations and its clinical implication

BACKGROUND

In the classification recently proposed by the Pathology Committee of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) was divided into three subtypes: pure SCLC, mixed small cell/large cell carcinoma (mixed SC/LC), and combined SCLC.

METHODS

To examine the clinical utility of this classification, histologic specimens, cytologic specimens obtained by brushing or fine-needle aspiration, and sputum cytologic specimens from 430 patients with SCLC were reviewed.

RESULTS

When the subtype of SCLC was determined from the biopsy specimen, cytologic specimen obtained by brushing or fine-needle aspiration, and sputum cytologic specimen, the frequency of mixed SC/LC was 25 of 299 (8.4%), 75 of 400 (18.8%), and 8 of 232 (3.4%), respectively. Whatever the diagnostic method, patients with mixed SC/LC showed a poorer response to treatment and worse prognosis than those with pure SCLC: a median survival of 144 days versus 285 days when classified with the use of biopsy specimens; 160 days versus 275 days with cytologic specimens obtained by brushing or fine-needle aspiration; and 47 days versus 259 days with sputum cytologic specimens, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed that mixed SC/LC should be separated from pure SCLC as a distinctive group and that cytologic studies of specimens obtained by brushing or fine-needle aspiration were sensitive and useful procedures for this purpose.

Prognostic significance of histopathologic subtype and stage in small cell lung cancer

A study of 149 light microscopic tissue slides from 147 patients with recorded initial diagnoses of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (114 cases) and undifferentiated carcinoma (35 cases) was undertaken to test the reproducibility and prognostic impact of a new histopathologic subclassification of SCLC proposed by the Pathology Panel of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). This study was further designed to test the impact of clinical stage, age, sex, and race on survival. The tissue slides were blindly reclassified as SCLC or non-SCLC by a panel of five pathologists with no knowledge of the initial diagnosis. The SCLCs were divided into the three subtypes outlined by the IASLC pathology panel: small (classic or pure), mixed (small cell/large cell), and combined (small cell/squamous carcinoma or small cell/adenocarcinoma). Small cell lung cancer was clinically staged as local, regional, or distant. Consensus diagnosis (defined as agreement by at least three of the five pathologists) was achieved in 144 (96.6%) of the 149 cases. Of these 144 cases, 124 were reclassified as SCLC (115 [92.8%] small, five [4.0%] mixed, and four [3.2%] combined) and 20 were classified as non-SCLC. The median lengths of survival for the small, mixed, and combined subtypes were 225, 1,110, and 203 days, respectively (P = .025). Adequate staging data were available in 123 of the 124 SCLC cases. Of the 123 SCLC cases, 27 (21.9%) were local, 22 (17.9%) were regional, and 74 (60.2%) were distant stage. The median lengths of survival for the local, regional, and distant stages were 428, 251, and 111 days, respectively. This association was highly significant (P = .0001). We conclude that stage is the major determinant of survival in SCLC. Mixed subtypes had significantly longer survival times than the small or combined subtypes (P = .025). Survival times were longer for women than for men, and the survival time difference between men and women was significant (P = .0028). We found no significant differences in survival according to age or race.

Extrapulmonary and pulmonary small-cell carcinoma: tumor biology, therapy, and outcome

Extrapulmonary small-cell cancer is a distinct clinicopathological entity from small-cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung. Approximately 1,000 cases have been projected annually in the United States, which represents an overall incidence of between 0.1% and 0.4% of all cancer. Not surprisingly then, little information is available regarding the treatment of this disease, which presents a challenge to the clinician when it is regionally confined. The majority of patients with extrapulmonary small-cell neoplasms have only been treated with local modalities of therapy, surgery, radiation, or a combination of both. Prolonged survival is not infrequent, which is in contrast to the experience for small-cell lung cancer and surprising given our current systemic approach to patients with this disease. This report will summarize the similarities and differences in biology, natural history, and clinical characteristics of patients with extrapulmonary small-cell cancer and small-cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung. The histogenesis of small-cell cancer is briefly reviewed. A general therapeutic approach to patients with small-cell lung cancer is reported. Lastly, recommendations for therapy of patients with regionally confined extrapulmonary small-cell cancer by primary site are outlined.

Gastrin-releasing peptide gene expression in small cell and large cell undifferentiated lung carcinomas

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP; mammalian bombesin) is present in the neuroendocrine cells of human fetal lung and in small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs), where it may act as a growth factor. Considering the potential importance of GRP as a tumor marker, we have conducted a retrospective immunohistochemical analysis of 176 lung tumors for markers of GRP gene expression, as well as several other markers of neuroendocrine cell differentiation: chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, and calcitonin. The majority of carcinoids contained mature GRP, in contrast to only a minority of SCLCs and large cell lung carcinomas (LCLCs). However, a majority of SCLCs and LCLCs contained proGRP immunoreactivity. In situ hybridization did not add any information beyond what was obtained using proGRP antisera. In spite of sharing these neuroendocrine cell markers, SCLCs are associated with a graver prognosis than LCLCs. No prognostic significance was associated with immunostaining for GRP or several other markers of neuroendocrine cell differentiation.