Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

The Use of Nerve Conduction Study to Evaluate the Effects of Frozen Sock Treatment on Docetaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Background/Objectives: Docetaxel is a cytotoxic agent for the treatment of breast cancer, and its toxicities include peripheral neuropathy (PN). This study evaluated the ability of frozen sock (FS) treatment to prevent docetaxel-induced PN by performing nerve conduction study (NCS). Methods: From October 2017 to October 2018, 48 patients who had invasive carcinoma and were planned for docetaxel treatment every three weeks were evaluated. Patients wore a FS on the right foot, and the left foot was not protected by the FS during docetaxel infusion. Motor and sensory NCS as well as nail and skin toxicities were assessed. Results: The amplitude and velocity of the motor and sensory nerves significantly decreased after three months in both feet. Before and after three months of chemotherapy, the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) for the right peroneal nerve were 7.64 ± 2.42 and 6.81 ± 2.21 mV, respectively (p < 0.001), and 7.13 ± 2.41 and 5.90 ± 2.24 mV, respectively (p < 0.001), for the left peroneal nerve. Reductions in the CMAP amplitude of the peroneal nerve were significantly lower in the right foot compared to the left foot (-9.58 vs. -16.8, p = 0.043). Application of the FS did not significantly decrease the overall incidence of skin and nail toxicity compared with the left foot during the study period (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: Docetaxel induced motor and sensory PN, but the use of a FS resulted in a smaller reduction in peroneal nerve amplification three months after the end of chemotherapy.

Allergy testing for Cremophor in a patient with cervical cancer with infusion reactions to paclitaxel and docetaxel

A woman in her 30s with cervical cancer underwent postoperative chemotherapy and showed allergic reactions to multiple taxanes. As the patient had infusion reactions to both paclitaxel and docetaxel, a prick test with Cremophor was conducted. In the absence of an allergic reaction to etoposide, we determined that the patient was allergic to pure taxane compounds. Among infusion reactions caused by taxanes, Cremophor allergy is reported in 3% of cases. Therefore, a prick test with Cremophor performed on a taxane infusion reaction will be useful in diagnosing allergy. In addition, allergy due to docetaxel may be managed by adequate premedication and continuous intravenous chlorpheniramine administration.

Dark Side of Cancer Therapy: Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiopulmonary Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Immune Modulation

Advancements in cancer therapy increased the cancer free survival rates and reduced the malignant related deaths. Therapeutic options for patients with thoracic cancers include surgical intervention and the application of chemotherapy with ionizing radiation. Despite these advances, cancer therapy-related cardiopulmonary dysfunction (CTRCPD) is one of the most undesirable side effects of cancer therapy and leads to limitations to cancer treatment. Chemoradiation therapy or immunotherapy promote acute and chronic cardiopulmonary damage by inducing reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, inflammation, fibrosis, deregulation of cellular immunity, cardiopulmonary failure, and non-malignant related deaths among cancer-free patients who received cancer therapy. CTRCPD is a complex entity with multiple factors involved in this pathogenesis. Although the mechanisms of cancer therapy-induced toxicities are multifactorial, damage to the cardiac and pulmonary tissue as well as subsequent fibrosis and organ failure seem to be the underlying events. The available biomarkers and treatment options are not sufficient and efficient to detect cancer therapy-induced early asymptomatic cell fate cardiopulmonary toxicity. Therefore, application of cutting-edge multi-omics technology, such us whole-exome sequencing, DNA methylation, whole-genome sequencing, metabolomics, protein mass spectrometry and single cell transcriptomics, and 10 X spatial genomics, are warranted to identify early and late toxicity, inflammation-induced carcinogenesis response biomarkers, and cancer relapse response biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge on cancer therapy-induced cardiopulmonary complications and our current understanding of the pathological and molecular consequences of cancer therapy-induced cardiopulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, immune suppression, and tumor recurrence, and possible treatment options for cancer therapy-induced cardiopulmonary toxicity.

Different treatment efficacies and side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy

Differences in efficacy and toxicity between Asian and Caucasian patients with lung cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy is increasingly recognised. This is a major concern in the clinical setting as it influences outcomes and affect international harmonization of drug development. Interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics, where different genetic polymorphisms affect drug metabolism, transport, and receptor binding may account for the ethnic differences. Treatment efficacy and outcomes may also be explained by differences in diet and lifestyle, access to healthcare, cultural barriers and environmental exposure. Efforts made to design prospective studies investigating ethnic specific determinants to systemic therapy and individualise lung cancer treatment based on genetic makeup of patient are important.

Fatal neutropenic enterocolitis associated with docetaxel use: A review of cases reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

Docetaxel is a microtubule inhibitor indicated for the treatment of multiple cancers as a single agent or in combination with other antineoplastics. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted a postmarketing review of fatal neutropenic enterocolitis cases reported with docetaxel using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and literature to determine whether the drug was a potential cause. We searched FAERS and the literature for reports of fatal neutropenic enterocolitis with docetaxel-based treatment reported between 14 May 1996 and 13 March 2017. We characterized the clinical course and severity of neutropenic enterocolitis and utilized the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre rubric to assess drug causality. We identified 41 fatal cases of neutropenic enterocolitis with docetaxel from FAERS and the literature. The median time to onset of neutropenic enterocolitis from last docetaxel dose was seven days (range 2-13 days), and median time to death was nine days (range 3-23 days). The cause of death in 83% (34/41) of patients was neutropenic enterocolitis. We determined the drug-event association as probable in seven cases. Neutropenic enterocolitis with docetaxel monotherapy occurred in six cases; however, in 85% (35/41) of cases, neutropenic enterocolitis occurred when docetaxel was used in combination with other cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some cases, neutropenic enterocolitis occurred despite use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Neutropenic enterocolitis is a severe and potentially fatal complication of docetaxel-based treatment, especially when combined with other antineoplastic treatments known to cause neutropenia. Practitioners should be aware of this safety risk to promptly recognize and manage patients.

Doses of radiation to the pericardium, instead of heart, are significant for survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Higher cardiac dose was associated with worse overall survival in the RTOG0617 study. Pericardial effusion (PCE) is a common cardiac complication of thoracic radiation therapy (RT). We investigated whether doses of radiation to the heart and pericardium are associated with PCE and overall survival in patients treated with thoracic radiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 94 patients with medically inoperable/unresectable NSCLC treated with definitive RT in prospective studies were reviewed for this secondary analysis. Heart and pericardium were contoured consistently according to the RTOG1106 Atlas, with the great vessels and thymus of the upper mediastinal structures included in the upper part of pericardium, only heart chambers included in the heart structure. Clinical factors and dose-volume parameters associated with PCE or survival were identified via Cox proportional hazards modeling. The risk of PCE and death were mapped using DVH atlases.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for surviving patients was 58 months. The overall rate of PCE was 40.4%. On multivariable analysis, dosimetric factors of heart and pericardium were significantly associated with the risk of PCE. Pericardial V30 and V55 were significantly correlated with overall survival, but presence of PCE and heart dosimetric factors were not.

CONCLUSION

PCE was associated with both heart and pericardial doses. The significance of pericardial dosimetric parameters, but not heart chamber parameters, on survival suggests the potential significance of radiation damage to the cranial region of pericardium.

Pericardial Disease Associated with Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pericardial effusion is commonly associated with malignancy. The goals of treatment should include optimizing symptom relief, minimizing repeat interventions, and restoring as much functional status as possible.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pericardiocentesis should be the first intervention but has high recurrence rates (30-60%). For patients with recurrence, repeat pericardiocentesis is indicated in those with limited expected lifespans. Extended pericardial drainage decreases recurrence to 10-20%. The addition of sclerosing agents decreases recurrence slightly but creates significant pain and can lead to pericardial constriction and therefore has fallen out of favor. Most patients with symptomatic pericardial disease have a short median survival time due to their underlying disease. In patients with a longer life expectancy, surgical drainage offers the lowest recurrence rate. Surgical approach is based on effusion location and clinical condition. Subxiphoid and thoracoscopic approaches lead to similar outcomes. Thoracotomy should be avoided as it increases morbidity without improving outcomes.

Phosphatidylcholine attenuated docetaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in rats

Docetaxel is a taxane chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of breast cancer, prostate cancer and gastric cancer, but several side effects such as peripheral neurotoxicity could occur. The present study was designed to investigate the therapeutic potential of phosphatidylcholine (PC) on docetaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. Rats were randomly divided into three groups and treated for 4 weeks. Behavioral tests were conducted to measure the effects of PC on docetaxel-induced decreases in mechanical & thermal nociceptive threshold. Biochemical tests were conducted to measure the level of oxidative stress on sciatic nerve. Histopathological and immunohistochemical experiments were also conducted to assess neuronal damage and glial activation. PC treatment significantly attenuated docetaxel-induced changes in mechanical & thermal nociceptive response latencies. PC decreased oxidative stress in sciatic nerve by increasing antioxidant levels (glutathione, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity). In immunohistochemical evaluation, PC treatment ameliorated docetaxel-induced neuronal damage and microglial activation in the sciatic nerve and spinal cord. Thus, PC showed protective effects against docetaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. These effects may be attributed to its antioxidant properties and modulation of microglia.

Incidence and Predictors of Pericardial Effusion After Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Findings from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617 suggested that collateral radiation to the heart may contribute to early death in patients receiving chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, reports of cardiac toxicity after thoracic radiation therapy (RT) remain limited. Because pericardial disease is the most common cardiac complication of thoracic RT, we investigated the incidence of and risk factors for pericardial effusion (PCE) in patients enrolled in a phase 2 prospective randomized study of intensity modulated RT versus proton therapy for locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 2009 through April 2014, 201 patients were prospectively treated with proton beam therapy or intensity modulated RT to 60 to 74 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint (grade ≥2 PCE) was diagnosed on review of follow-up images. Clinical characteristics and cardiac dose-volume parameters associated with PCE were identified via Cox proportional hazards modeling and recursive partitioning analysis of null Martingale residuals. Reproducibility was evaluated in a separate retrospective cohort of 301 patients.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence rates of PCE among patients in the trial were 31.4% at 1 year and 45.4% at 2 years, with a median time to PCE of 8.9 months. Several cardiac dose-volume parameters (eg, V20 [volume receiving ≥20 Gy] to V65 [volume receiving ≥65 Gy]) predicted PCE, but heart volume receiving ≥35 Gy (HV35) was the most strongly associated, with a cutoff volume of 10%. On multivariate analysis, HV35 >10% independently predicted PCE (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; P=.002), a finding that maintained reproducibility in the retrospective validation cohort. Other factors associated with PCE included receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.82; P<.001) and prior cardiac disease (HR, 1.68; P=.020).

CONCLUSIONS

PCE was common after RT for NSCLC, occurring in nearly half of patients even after moderate radiation doses to the heart. Adjuvant chemotherapy may increase the risk of PCE, and HV35 >10% may identify patients at risk of development of this cardiac toxicity.

Docetaxel: use in non—small cell lung cancer and metastatic breast cancer and formulation update

Objective. To summarize the systematic development of docetaxel as a new and effective treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer patients, and to discuss the physical and chemical stability, compatibility with drugs commonly used in cancer patients, and administration issues with the new docetaxel formulation.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search was conducted using carboplatin, cisplatin, compatibility, docetaxel, doxorubicin, metastatic breast cancer (MBC), NSCLC, and stability as search terms. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Information related to the new docetaxel formulation was obtained from the manufacturer. The clinical literature was reviewed and analyzed.

Data Synthesis. Docetaxel has recently emerged as an active agent in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and MBC. Results of phase II and III studies of single-agent docetaxel and docetaxel combinations, both as first- and second-line therapy, have produced impressive response rates and improved survival times compared with current standards of care. Docetaxel has a unique toxicity profile that includes hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxicities, and fluid retention. Because docetaxel's toxicity profile differs from that of the platinum analogs and the anthracyclines, combinations with these agents for NSCLC and MBC are well tolerated.

Docetaxel was recently reformulated, allowing for improved stability, shelf-life, and storage requirements. Compatibility studies of docetaxel with 81 commonly used drugs in cancer patients were recently reported, showing that docetaxel is compatible with all but three drugs studied—amphotericin B, nalbuphine hydrochloride, and methylprednisolone sodium succinate—when administered as Y-site injections into existing intravenous lines. With the increasing use of this agent, the new docetaxel formulation and compatibility data should facilitate ease of administration.

Docetaxel in hepatic impairment

Purpose. The primary objective of this paper is to provide a brief overview of docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, and drug interactions, concentrating on their relationship with docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Sources. The literature was reviewed through a MEDLINE search from 1986 to 2000. Relevant articles cited in literature obtained by MEDLINE searching were also considered. The following terms were searched: hepatic impairment, liver failure, Taxotere, and docetaxel. The search was restricted to the English language.

Data Extraction. The current literature is reviewed in regard to docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing, efficacy, adverse effects, and drug interactions and with a special emphasis on docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Synthesis. Docetaxel has a wide spectrum of clinical activity and is used frequently in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, NSCLC, ovarian cancer and cancer of the head and neck. The dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel is neutropenia. Docetaxel is metabolized in the liver and elevations in hepatic enzymes can predict a reduced clearance of docetaxel, which is associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling, docetaxel can be safely administered in patients with elevated hepatic enzymes if the dose is reduced on the first cycle.

Docetaxel-induced pericardial effusion

Hypersensitivity reactions, cumulative fluid retention, and neurotoxicity are frequently seen toxicities related to docetaxel. Fluid retention may be present as edema, weight gain, or third place fluid collection. Pericardial effusion is rarely seen with docetaxel treatment. We report a 58-year-old female patient who was presented with pericardial tamponade after three cycles of docetaxel therapy.

Management of hypersensitivity to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy: cepo review and clinical recommendations

BACKGROUND

Although antineoplastic agents are critical in the treatment of cancer, they can potentially cause hypersensitivity reactions that can have serious consequences. When such a reaction occurs, clinicians can either continue the treatment, at the risk of causing a severe or a potentially fatal anaphylactic reaction, or stop the treatment, although it might be the only one available. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used to prevent and treat hypersensitivity reactions to platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy and to develop evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

The scientific literature published to December 2013, inclusive, was reviewed.

RESULTS

Premedication with antihistamines, H2 blockers, and corticosteroids is not effective in preventing hypersensitivity reactions to platinum salts. However, premedication significantly reduces the incidence of hypersensitivity to taxanes. A skin test can generally be performed to screen for patients at risk of developing a severe reaction to platinum salts in the presence of grade 1 or 2 reactions, but skin testing does not appear to be useful for taxanes. A desensitization protocol allows for re-administration of either platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy to some patients without causing severe hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Several strategies such as premedication, skin testing, and desensitization protocols are available to potentially allow for administration of platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy to patients who have had a hypersensitivity reaction and for whom no other treatment options are available. Considering the available evidence, the Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie made recommendations for clinical practice in Quebec.

Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer

The taxane chemotherapeutic agent docetaxel has been utilized in the management of breast cancer in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Although well tolerated by the majority of patients, docetaxel toxicity may limit the dose which can be administered. Adverse events include infusion reactions, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, fluid retention, pneumonitis, cutaneous and nail toxicity, epiphora and lacrimal duct stenosis, gastrointestinal complications, and neuropathies. In this review, we explore these complications and how they can be effectively managed to improve patient quality of life during and following docetaxel therapy.

Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Ethnic differences in drug susceptibility and toxicity are a major concern, not only in drug development but also in the clinical setting. We review the toxicity profiles of docetaxel according to dose and ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed phase II and III clinical trials that included a once-every-3-weeks single-agent docetaxel arm. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant variables affecting the reported incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified studies conducted in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 19.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.64-99.0] and docetaxel dose (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) as independent variables for the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference in the incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia between Asian and non-Asian clinical studies. Physicians and pharmacists should consider ethnic diversity in docetaxel toxicity when interpreting the results of clinical trials.

A phase I study of bi-weekly docetaxel for recurrent or advanced gastric cancer patients whose disease progressed by prior chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Although docetaxel is active against gastric cancer, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurs in the majority of patients in Japan when administered at 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. To determine a more convenient and tolerable schedule than the tri-weekly schedule, we conducted a dose-escalation study of bi-weekly docetaxel. In this study, we investigated the maximum-tolerated dose and recommended dose.

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric cancer who had received prior chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2004 and March 2007. This study was designed to evaluate the escalated dose of docetaxel starting at 35 mg/m(2) (Level 1) given every 2 weeks. The dose was escalated in a stepwise fashion to 40 mg/m(2) (Level 2), 45 mg/m(2) (Level 3) and 50 mg/m(2) (Level 4).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients completed at least two cycles of the therapy. Three episodes of Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in all patients and Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at Level 4 in six patients. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were not observed. Grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevation (n= 1) and Grade 3 stomatitis (n = 1) were noted at Level 4. There was no other Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity. The definition of dose-limiting toxicities of this docetaxel schedule at Level 4 are Grade 4 neutropenia, Grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevation and Grade 3 stomatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel when administrated following the bi-weekly schedule was 50 mg/m(2) and the recommended dose was 45 mg/m(2). Bi-weekly administration of docetaxel may provide a better tolerated and efficacious use in gastric cancer.

Anticancer therapy induced cardiotoxicity: review of the literature

Innovative anticancer strategies have contributed to an improved survival of patients suffering from malignancies, and in some cases, have turned cancer into a chronic disease. Therefore, the early and particularly late onsets of adverse cardiovascular effects of systemic anticancer treatments are of increasing interest. Among a rapidly increasing variety of anticancer drugs, the anthracyclines and the monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab, are the agents with a well-known cardiotoxicity. The diagnostic work-up, the cardiotoxic risk of anthracyclines and trastuzumab, and additionally, cardiotoxicity as a risk factor of a multimodal therapeutic approach in breast cancer patients is discussed in this study.

Risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in large population-based cohorts of elderly patients with breast, ovarian, and lung cancer

There is little information on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) for community-dwelling patients with cancer. We studied 65,316 patients with breast cancer, 9242 with ovarian cancer, and 86,278 with non-small cell lung cancer from 1991 through 2002 identified from the 16 areas of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results. The incidence density of PN was 15.3, 21.5, and 18.3 per 1000 person-years for patients with breast, ovarian, and lung cancer who received platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy, respectively. Patients with breast, ovarian, and lung cancer receiving taxanes were more than twice as likely to develop PN compared with those not receiving chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.22, 95% confidence interval = 1.85-2.66 in patients with breast cancer), whereas patients who received platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy were more than 3 times as likely to develop PN compared with women who did not receive chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.33, 95% confidence interval = 2.05-5.05). In patients with ovarian or lung cancer receiving taxanes or platinum-taxane combination therapy, the risk of PN was increased with increasing number of chemotherapy cycles. These findings remained similar after adjusting for the history of preexisting PN or diabetes. Close monitoring for PN in patients receiving taxanes alone or in combination with platinum compounds may be warranted.

Phase II study of a biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this study, 48 patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC were given combination chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2); both drugs were given biweekly, on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response and stable disease were observed in 25 patients (52.1%, 95% CI: 38.7-66.9%) and ten patients (20.8%), respectively. The overall median survival was 14.0 months (95% CI: 7.10-20.9 months). There was no treatment-related mortality. The major toxicity was grade 2 asthenia (35.4%). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (4.2%), as was grade 3 infection (4.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

As a front-line chemotherapy in an outpatient setting for patients with metastatic NSCLC, the biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin showed effective antitumor activity with a marked reduction in hematologic toxicity, comparable to the results of previous studies using 3-week or weekly schedules. Further randomized studies are needed before this can be accepted as a standard schedule.

A multi-center phase II study of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer, which was histologically proven with at least one measurable lesion, were eligible for the study. Docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) were intravenously given on day 1 of 21 days schedule.

RESULTS

From December 2004 to December 2007, total of 39 patients (M/F = 39/0) were enrolled. The median age was 65 years. Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response. There were 3 (7.7%) complete remission, 10 (25.6%) partial remission, 11 (28.2%) stable disease, and 10 (25.6%) progression disease. The objective tumor response rate was 33.3% in intention-to-treat (ITT). Median PFS was 5.0 months and median survival was 8.3 months. Median number of cycles administered was 3. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 92 and 91%, respectively. This treatment was comparatively tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20.5%/10.3%, grade 3 infection in 2.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic squamous esophageal cancer.

First line chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study

INTRODUCTION

We report outcomes for a phase II study of the combination of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with chemotherapy-naive, stage IIIB/IV, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, ages 70 years or older, were eligible. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and docetaxel (20 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-six (95.8%) of the 48 patients were assessable for response, 1 case of complete response and 18 cases of partial response were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 39.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.7-53.5%). The median time to progression and overall survival for all patients was 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.7 months) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.6-12.2 months), respectively. The most severe hematologic adverse event was anemia, which occurred with grade 3 intensity in 6 (13.0%) patients and grade 4 in 2 (4.3%) patients. Neutropenia occurred with grade 3 intensity in 4 (8.7%) patients. Grade 3 asthenia, diarrhea, neuropathy, stomatitis, and nausea/vomiting were observed in 2 (4.3%), 5 (10.9%), 5 (10.9%), 5 (10.9%), and 3 (6.5%) patients, respectively. Yet, no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin is a well-tolerated treatment modality with encouraging activity and survival outcome in previously untreated elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A randomised phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy of cisplatin-docetaxel or docetaxel alone for clinical stage IB/II non-small-cell lung cancer results of a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0204)

Preoperative chemotherapy is a promising strategy in patients with early-stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); optimal chemotherapy remains unclear. Clinical (c-) stage IB/II NSCLC patients were randomised to receive either two cycles of docetaxel (D)-cisplatin (P) combination chemotherapy (D 60 mg m(-2) and P 80 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 3-4 weeks or three cycles of D monotherapy (70 mg m(-2)) every 3weeks. Thoracotomy was performed 4-5 weeks (DP) or 3-4 weeks (D) after chemotherapy. The primary end point was 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). From October 2002 to November 2003, 80 patients were randomised. Chemotherapy toxicities were mainly haematologic and well tolerated. There were two early postoperative deaths with DP (one intraoperative bleeding and one empyema). Pathologic complete response was observed in two DP patients. Docetaxel-cisplatin was superior to D in terms of response rate (45 vs 15%) and complete resection rate (95 vs 87%). Both DFS and overall survival were better in DP. Disease-free survival at 1, 2 and 4 years were 78, 65 and 57% with DP, and were 62, 44 and 36% with D, respectively. Preoperative DP was associated with encouraging resection rate and DFS data, and phase III trials for c-stage IB/II NSCLC are warranted.

Matched case-control phase 2 study to evaluate the use of a frozen sock to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the foot

BACKGROUND

Onycholysis occurs in approximately 30% of patients treated with docetaxel. The efficacy and safety of an Elasto-Gel frozen sock (FS) was investigated for the prevention of docetaxel-induced nail and skin toxicity of the feet.

METHODS

Patients receiving docetaxel at a dose of 70 to 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks were eligible for this matched case-control study. Each patient wore an FS for 90 minutes on the right foot. The unprotected left foot acted as control. Nail and skin toxicities were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3) and compared using a 2-sample Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank test adjusted for tied values.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients were included between April 2005 and January 2007. Nail toxicity was significantly lower in the FS-protected foot compared with the control foot (grade 0: 100% versus 79%; and grade 1 and 2: 0% versus 21%, respectively) (P= .002). Skin toxicity was grade 0: 98% versus 94%; and grade 1 and 2: 2% versus 6% in the FS-protected and the control feet, respectively. The median times until toxicity occurrence were not found to differ significantly between the groups. One patient experienced discomfort because of cold intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold therapy using FS significantly reduced the incidence of docetaxel-induced foot nail toxicity, as previously demonstrated using frozen gloves for the hands.

Analysis of Phase II Studies on Targeted Agents and Subsequent Phase III Trials: What Are the Predictors for Success?

Purpose

To identify the characteristics of phase II studies that predict for subsequent “positive” phase III trials (those that reached the proposed primary end points of study or those wherein the study drug was superior to the standard regimen investigating targeted agents in advanced tumors.

Methods

We identified all phase III clinical trials of targeted therapies against advanced cancers published from 1985 to 2005. Characteristics of the preceding phase II studies were reviewed to identify predictive factors for success of the subsequent phase III trial. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test and logistic regression models.

Results

Of 351 phase II studies, 167 (47.6%) subsequent phase III trials were positive and 184 (52.4%) negative. Phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions were more likely to precede a successful trial (60.4% v 39.4%; P < .001). Positive phase II results were more likely to lead to a successful phase III trial (50.8% v 22.5%; P = .003). The percentage of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compared with academic, cooperative groups, and research institutes (89.5% v 44.2%, 45.2%, and 46.3%, respectively; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these factors and shorter time interval between publication of phase II results and III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial.

Conclusion

In phase II studies of targeted agents, multiple- versus single-institution participation, positive phase II trial, pharmaceutical company-based trials, and shorter time period between publication of phase II to phase III trial were independent predictive factors of success in a phase III trial. Investigators should be cognizant of these factors in phase II studies before designing phase III trials.

Phase I/II trial of weekly intravenous 130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel as initial chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (NAB-paclitaxel) is an albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel that has demonstrated improved efficacy compared with paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. We undertook this trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and single-agent activity of NAB-paclitaxel administered on a weekly basis to patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm, phase I/II study. Patients were treated with NAB-paclitaxel intravenously during 30 minutes without corticosteroid or antihistamine premedications on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiologic tumor assessment was performed every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Dose levels of 100 and 125 mg/m(2) were tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). At 150 mg/m(2) the MTD was exceeded; two of three patients experienced a DLT (grade 3 sensory neuropathy and febrile neutropenia). The 125 mg/m(2) dose level was expanded and determined to be the MTD. A total of 40 patients were treated at 125 mg/m(2). The objective response rate was 30% (12 of 40 patients; 95% CI, 16% to 44%), median time to progression was 5 months (95% CI, 3 to 8 months), and median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 7 months to not reached). The 1-year survival was 41%.

CONCLUSION

NAB-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity. No corticosteroid premedication was administered and no hypersensitivity reactions were seen. Additional studies of single-agent NAB-paclitaxel as well as platinum-based combinations are warranted.

Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) treated with either docetaxel plus gemcitabine or single-agent docetaxel. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG [n=157; gemcitabine 1100mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8], docetaxel 75mg/m(2) on day 8 or D [n=155; docetaxel 100mg/m(2) on day 1] every 3 weeks. A total of 312 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A predefined interim intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly longer median OS (p=0.037) in favor of the DG regimen (9.4 months versus 8.3 months for DG and D regimens, respectively), resulting in the premature termination of the study. The DG regimen was also associated with a significantly higher response rate compared to D (26.8% versus 11.6%, p<0.001). TTP were 3.5 and 2.3 months for the DG and D regimen, respectively (p=0.054). Although there were two treatment-related deaths in the DG arm, the toxicity profiles of the two regimens were comparable. The DG regimen was associated with a significantly better quality of life. The efficacy of the docetaxel plus gemcitabine combination is superior to single-agent docetaxel in chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase I study of vinorelbine and irinotecan in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Vinorelbine alone and irinotecan alone have been shown to have efficacy against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); each drug has different mechanisms of action. A phase I study using a combination of vinorelbine and irinotecan as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients (<or=75 years old) with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Based on a 4-week cycle, vinorelbine was given on days 1 and 8, and irinotecan was given on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously. To prevent an injection site reaction to vinorelbine, the site was treated with topical clobetasol ointment, and the patients were given intravenous dexamethasone prior to vinorelbine treatment. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=4 days or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, >or=grade 3 non-hematological toxicities, or the need to cancel drug administration on both days 8 and 15.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled. DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients at level 3 (20 mg/m(2) vinorelbine, 50 mg/m(2 )irinotecan), in 2 of 3 at level 4 (25 mg/m(2), 50 mg/m(2)), and in 2 of 5 at modified level 4 (20, 60 mg/m(2)). Level 4 and modified level 4 were considered to be the MTD; dose level 3 was therefore recommended. DLTs included liver dysfunction, pneumonitis, colitis, and arrhythmia. Injection site reactions were mild. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and easily controlled.

CONCLUSION

Use of 20 mg/m(2) vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 followed by 50 mg/m(2 )irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks warrants a phase II study.

Economic evaluation of docetaxel/gemcitabine versus docetaxel as frontline treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Greece

OBJECTIVES

The combination of docetaxel/gemcitabine is an acceptable chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic evaluation is undertaken alongside a multi-centre randomized phase III trial, which compares docetaxel/gemcitabine combination with docetaxel monotherapy, in untreated patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Trial resource utilisation data are combined with unit price data used to evaluate the cost of chemotherapy, concomitant medications, hospitalisations, diagnostic and laboratory tests and second-line chemotherapy. Treatment cost is combined with survival to estimate the incremental cost per-life-year-saved with the combination therapy versus monotherapy. To deal with uncertainty, stochastic analysis is used to plot cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS

Median survival is 9.1 months (range 1-36.2) and 8.3 months (range 1-26.8) (p: 0.025) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. The mean total treatment cost of patients with docetaxel is estimated at Euro5736 and with docetaxel/gemcitabine at Euro7417, a difference of Euro1542 (95%CI: Euro499-2561). The incremental cost per-life-year-saved of the combination therapy is euro9538 and the probability to be cost-effective is 91% at a threshold of Euro20,000, 97% at a threshold of Euro35,000 and 98% at a threshold of Euro50,000.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support that docetaxel/gemcitabine combination represents a cost-effective treatment option in relation to docetaxel monotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the Greek NHS setting.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Docetaxel in Refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix

OBJECTIVE

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the antitumor activity and adverse effects of docetaxel in patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS

Eligible patients were to have measurable disease and not more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Docetaxel 100 mg/m was administered intravenously over 1 hour. This treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression of disease or adverse effects prohibited further therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were entered onto this study, of whom 23 were eligible and evaluable. There were 2 (8.7%) partial responses. Eight patients (34.8%) had stable disease and 9 patients (39.1%) had increasing disease. The median time to progression was 3.8 months (range, 1.2-11.7 months), while median survival time was 7.0 months (range, 1.8-23.0 months). The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia, infection, gastrointestinal, and constitutional.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel has minimal activity in refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix at the dose and schedule tested.

Docetaxel-induced onycholysis: the role of subungual hemorrhage and suppuration

Nail changes are common side effects of taxane chemotherapeutic agents. Docetaxel (Taxotere) is known to cause a great incidence of nail change. Various types of nail changes have previously been reported as a result of treatment with taxanes. We describe 2 cases of severe nail changes induced by docetaxel. The patients had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer and advanced gastric cancer, respectively. During the course of treatment with docetaxel, nail changes became apparent in both patients. Initially, they complained of nail bed purpura. Subungual hematomas with hemopurulent discharge were later observed in several fingers. Drainage of the hemopurulent material occurred spontaneously in our cases, leading to onycholysis. Following drainage, the pain in the nail with subungual hemoprulent material was relieved immediately and spontaneous healing of the patients' nails was noticed after few months. Subungual hemorrhage and suppuration therefore are considered causes of onycholysis and the pain in these patients. Although systemic or topical antibiotics were not used to treat these patients, antibiotics may be also worthwhile to hasten the drainage of the subungual hematomas and suppuration in patients for quick relief of pain.

Data acquisition for the histoculture drug response assay in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Application of the histoculture drug response assay for lung cancer was investigated by using data acquired from lung cancer specimens.

METHODS

From May 1994 through February 2005, histoculture drug response assay data were obtained from 359 lung cancer specimens held in our institute. We examined chemosensitivities of the tissues to cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, paclitaxel, etoposide, irinotecan, and gemcitabine. Cutoff inhibition rates were determined with each drug for non-small cell lung cancer and were used to calculate predictabilities for chemotherapy responses.

RESULTS

The evaluability of the histoculture drug response assay was high at 97.4%. Good predictability, including true-positive and true-negative rates of 73.2% and 100%, respectively, with an accuracy of 83.0%, was observed.

CONCLUSION

The histoculture drug response assay appears to be applicable to non-small cell lung cancer for the prediction of responses to chemotherapy.

A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Weekly Docetaxel and Carboplatin in Elderly Patients With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), and the safety profile of a weekly docetaxel and carboplatin combination regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, >70 years of age, performance status (ECOG) 0-2, with adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were treated with docetaxel and carboplatin. Docetaxel was given at escalated doses starting from 20 mg/m2/wk on days 1, 8, and 15, with an increment of 5 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin also administered at escalated doses starting from AUC 4 to 6 (mg/ml/min); the regimen was administered every 4 weeks. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients enrolled in this study and assessed for safety. Neutropenia was the main DLT of the regimen; grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 5 patients (20%). Hematologic toxicities were mild, and included grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (4%) and grade 3 anemia in 1 patient (4%). Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, and included grade 3 constipation in 1 patient (4%) and grade 3 renal disorder in 1 patient (4%). Objective responses were seen in 9 patients (response rate 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD was carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; therefore, the RD for the phase II study is carboplatin AUC 5 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. This regimen merits further investigation in phase II trials.

Clinical pharmacology and use of microtubule-targeting agents in cancer therapy

The microtubule-targeting agents have made significant contributions to cancer therapy over the past 50 years. The vinca alkaloids and taxanes have been used to treat a broad range of malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas and many types of solid tumors. The taxanes have been frequently used in the treatment of advanced ovarian, breast, lung, head and neck, and prostate cancer, and they are increasingly being used in early stage disease. This chapter reviews the pharmacology, clinical indications, and toxicities associated with the vinca alkaloids and taxanes.

Interstitial docetaxel (taxotere), carmustine and combined interstitial therapy: a novel treatment for experimental malignant glioma

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a hemisynthetic, anti-cancer compound with good preclinical and clinical activity in a variety of systemic neoplasms. We tested its activity against malignant gliomas using local delivery methods. Antitumor activity was assessed in vitro against human (U87 and U80 glioma) and rat brain-tumor (9L gliosarcoma and F98 glioma) cell lines. For in vivo evaluation, we incorporated docetaxel into a biodegradable polymer matrix, determined associated toxicity in the rat brain, and measured efficacy at extending survival in a rat model of malignant glioma. Also, we examined the combined local delivery of docetaxel with carmustine (BCNU) against the experimental intracranial glioma. Rats bearing intracranial 9L gliosarcomas were treated 5 days after tumor implantation with various polymers (placebo, 5% docetaxel, 3.8% BCNU, or 5% docetaxel and 3.8% BCNU combination). Animals receiving docetaxel polymers (n=15, median survival 39.1 days) had significantly improved survival over control animals (n=12, median survival 22.5 days, P=0.01). Similarly, animals receiving BCNU polymers (n=15, median survival 39.3 days, 13.3% long-term survivors) demonstrated an increase in survival compared to the controls (P=0.04). Animals receiving the combination polymers demonstrated a modest increase in survival compared to either chemotherapeutic agent alone (n=14, median survival 54.9 days, 28.6% long-term survivors) with markedly improved survival over controls (P=0.003). We conclude that locally delivered docetaxel shows promise as a novel anti-glioma therapy and that the combination of drug regimens via biodegradable polymers may be a great therapeutic benefit to patients with malignant glioma.

Phase I/II trial of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted phase I and II studies of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy, followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objectives were to define the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I study, and to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate at the recommended dose (RD) in the phase II study.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC were studied. Six to eight cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin were administered at 2-week intervals. In the phase I study, patients received four dose levels: level 1, docetaxel/cisplatin=30/40 mg/m2; level 2, 35/40; level 3, 40/40; and level 4, 45/40. Radiotherapy was delivered at a rate of 2 Gy per fraction/day up to a total dose of 60 Gy over the course of 6 weeks, during the first three cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

DLT comprised neutropenia at level 4 in the phase I study (n=15), and level 3 was considered the RD. In the phase II study (n=46), two patients had a complete response (4.3%) and 34 had a partial response (73.9%), for an overall response rate of 78.2% [95% CI (66.3-90.2%)]. The survival rate was 69.1% at 1 year and 39.6% at 2 years, with a median survival time of 19.1 months. Leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and radiation esophagitis were the most common toxic reactions, with Grade > or = 3 reactions occurring at rates of 77, 70, 17, and 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent RT was active and well tolerated in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Based on the survival benefit demonstrated in large randomized clinical trials, docetaxel is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in both the first- and second-line settings. The efficacy of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin is equivalent to some, and superior to other, platinum-based doublets for first-line management of NSCLC, and has a manageable toxicity profile. Carboplatin-based regimens and nonplatinum combinations with docetaxel also have proven efficacy in first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC. Combinations of docetaxel with various novel targeted agents have produced encouraging data in Phase II studies. This article reviews recent studies of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens with cytotoxic and more recent targeted agents in the management of advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel- Ifosfamide-Carboplatin Combination in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

In the present phase II study we evaluated the docetaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (DICb) combination in the outpatient setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages IIIB/IV), WHO performance status (PS) <2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy drug doses were: docetaxel: 80 mg/m2, ifosfamide: 3.5 g/m2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (based on Calvert's formula), all on day 1, followed by prophylactic G-CSF.

RESULTS

Fourty patients were entered and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 64 (48-72); PS: 1 (0-1); gender: 29 males/11 females; stages: IIIB: 13 (33%), IV: 27 (67%). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included: lymph nodes: 25; bone: 7; liver: 4; brain: 5; lung nodules: 13; adrenals: 6. Responses were as follows: 22/40 [55%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54-81%] evaluable patients responded: 4 complete responses, 18 partial responses, 11 had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-14 months), median time to progression 9 months (range 2-18 months) and median overall survival 11 months (range 3-46+ months). 1-year survival was 47.5%. Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia 28/40, with 12 developing grade 4 and 12% febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia grade 3: 3/40 and grade 4: 1/40, no grade 3 neuropathy, grade 1 CNS toxicity in 3, no renal toxicity, 8 grade 2 diarrhea and 4 grade 3 vomiting.

CONCLUSION

In the present phase II study the DICb combination yielded important activity and good tolerability in advanced NSCLC.

Cardiotoxicity of cancer therapy

Because cancer is a leading cause of mortality in the United States, the number of therapeutic modalities available for the treatment of neoplastic processes has increased. This has resulted in a large number of patients being exposed to a wide variety of cancer therapy. Historically, it has been well recognized that antineoplastic agents may have adverse effects on multiple organs and normal tissues. The most commonly associated toxicities occur in tissues composed of rapidly dividing cells and may spontaneously reverse with minimal long-term toxicity. However, the myocardium consists of cells that have limited regenerative capability, which may render the heart susceptible to permanent or transient adverse effects from chemotherapeutic agents. Such toxicity encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders, ranging from relatively benign arrhythmias to potentially lethal conditions such as myocardial ischemia/infarction and cardiomyopathy. In some instances, the pathogenesis of these toxic effects has been elucidated, whereas in others the precise etiology remains unknown. We review herein the various syndromes of cardiac toxicity that are reported to be associated with antineoplastic agents and discuss their putative mechanisms and treatment.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with irinotecan and docetaxel: A multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the irinotecan plus docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with irinotecan 200mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2) support from day 2 to 9. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response was achieved in 9 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9.85-36.3%) patients; stable and progressive disease were observed in 10 (25.6%) and 20 (51.4%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 7.1 months and the median time to tumor progression 3 months. The median survival time was 10.8 months and the 1-year survival 42.2%. Four (10.3%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and all but one were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Nine (23.1%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea while grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in nine (23.1%), and grade 3 mucositis in two (2.6%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan/docetaxel is a relatively active non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity, which could be given in an outpatient basis; this regimen merits to be further studied in order to improve its tolerance and evaluate its clinical relevance in patients who can not tolerate platinum-based doublets.