Four-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy with double hematopoietic progenitor-cell rescue for metastatic breast cancer

Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with solid tumours and lymphomas

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim administered as haematological support after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, we compared 44 patients with solid tumours and lymphomas receiving a 6-mg single dose of pegfilgrastim on day +5 after transplantation to a historical control group of 25 patients receiving filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) starting on day +5. There were no significant differences in haematological recovery nor in the incidence and duration of neutropenic fever. Median duration of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim group was similar. The incidence of grade III-IV mucositis was lower in pegfilgrastim than in filgrastim group due to the significant difference observed among the patients with solid tumours (p = 0.00). The only adverse event considered to be cytokine related was mild to moderate bone pain occurring during haematological recovery. According to the present study design and taking into account the current prices in our institution, the cost of the two drugs was similar in both treatment groups. In conclusion, a single injection of pegfilgrastim administered at day +5 post-transplantation shows comparable safety and efficacy profiles to daily injections of filgrastim and may be cost effective.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy can cure patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but those who suffer treatment failure or relapse still have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve the outcome of these patients. We evaluated an intensified high-dose sequential chemotherapy program with a final myeloablative course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were age 18-65 years, histologically proven primary progressive or relapsed aggressive NHL and eligibility for HDCT. The therapy consists of two cycles DHAP: dexamethasone 40 mg (day 1-4), high-dose cytarabine 2 g/m2 12q (day 2), cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 51); patients with partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 (day 37), followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest; methotrexate 8 g/m2 (day 1) plus vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (day 51); and etoposide 500 mg/m2 (day 58-62). The final myeloblative course was BEAM: cytarabine 200 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), etoposide 150 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), melphalan 140 mg/m2 (day 80), carmustin 300 mg/m2 (day 80) followed by PBSCT.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (median age 43 years, range 24-65) were enrolled: 23 (40%) patients were refractory to primary therapy and 34 (60%) patients had relapsed NHL. The response rate (RR) after 2 cycles of DHAP was 72% (9% CR, 63% PR) and at the final evaluation (100 days post transplantation) 43% (32% CR, 11% PR). Toxicity was tolerable. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 1-76 months). Freedom from second failure (FF2F) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 25% and 47% for all patients, respectively. FF2F at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 35% and 9% (P=0.0006), respectively. OS at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 58% and 24% (P=0.0044), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this regimen is feasible, tolerable and effective in patients with relapsed NHL. In contrast, the results in patients with progressive disease are unsatisfactory. This program is currently being modified by addition of rituximab for patients with relapsed aggressive NHL.

Autologous transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's disease

The current data support the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as standard procedure for the majority of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) relapsing or progressing after combination chemotherapy. Prognostic factors reflecting unfavourable prognostic features of the disease as well as resistance to conventional salvage therapy have been identified. Preliminary data suggests a high efficacy of high-dose sequential chemotherapies in these patients. An ongoing randomized trial is comparing standard HDCT versus sequential HDCT in patients with relapsed HD.

Cologne high-dose sequential chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a large multicenter study of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG)

BACKGROUND

We designed a dose- and time-intensified high-dose sequential chemotherapy regimen for patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included age 18-65 years, histologically proven primary progressive (PD) or relapsed HD. Treatment consisted of two cycles DHAP (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, cisplatinum); patients with chemosensitive disease received cyclophosphamide followed by peripheral blood stem cell harvest; methotrexate plus vincristine, etoposide and BEAM plus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (median age 34 years, range 18-64) were enrolled. The response rate was 80% (72% complete response, 8% partial response). With a median follow-up of 30 months (range 3-61 months), freedom from second failure (FF2F) and overall survival (OS) were 59% and 78% for all patients, respectively. FF2F and OS for patients with early relapse were 62% and 81%, for late relapse 65% and 81%; for PD 41% and 48%, and for multiple relapse 39% and 48%, respectively. In multivariate analysis response after DHAP (P <0.0001) and duration of first remission (PD and multiple relapse versus early and late relapse; P=0.0127) were prognostic factors for FF2F. Response after DHAP (P <0.0081), duration of first remission (P=0.0017) and anemia (P=0.019) were significant for OS.

CONCLUSION

Based on the promising results of this study, a prospective randomized European intergroup study was started comparing this intensified regimen with two courses of DHAP followed by BEAM (HD-R2 protocol).

Three-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant has been increasingly used for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in recent years. Presently available results suggest an improvement in the complete remission rate and survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy. However, there is no plateau in the survival curves, and experiments with new treatment schedules and conditioning regimens are warranted.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In a non-randomised controlled trial, 20 patients underwent three-step HDT following conventional vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD)-based induction. In the intensification phase patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY), high-dose etoposide (HD-VP), and mitoxantrone (NOV) plus melphalan (L-PAM) with haemopoietic rescue. Maintenance treatment with interferon was given until relapse. Actuarial overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) curves were plotted according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. In five of the eight patients achieving complete remission (CR), the molecular disease was monitored by polymerase chain reaction technique (PCR).

RESULTS

Overall 18/20 (90%) patients responded, with a CR rate of 40%. After an average follow-up of 40 months, median EFS and OS are 25.5 and 44.6 months, respectively. Monoclonal cells were detectable in the post-treatment bone marrow and in the aphereses of the five CR patients monitored by PCR.

CONCLUSION

The present three-step HDT regimen, including conditioning with mitoxantrone and melphalan, proved to be feasible and safe. Our results are in agreement with the hypothesis that HDT results in an increased remission rate and in prolonged survival in newly diagnosed MM, but a cure is unlikely.

Randomized, controlled, dose-range study of Ro 25-8315 given before and after a high-dose combination chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of three different dose levels of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Ro 25-8315) on progenitor cell mobilization and hematologic recovery in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Breast cancer patients (n = 36) were randomly assigned to receive before (part I) and after (part II) chemotherapy either a single-dose injection of Ro 25-8315 (20 microg/kg, n = 9; 60 microg/kg, n = 9; 100 microg/kg, n = 10) or a standard daily dose of filgrastim (part I, 10 microg/kg/d; part II, 5 microg/kg/d) (control group, n = 8).

RESULTS

Overall, Ro 25-8315 was well tolerated. In part I, more progenitor cell mobilization was observed with Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg. The peak of circulating CD34(+) cells was obtained at day +5 in the four groups, and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) returned to less than 20 x 10(9)/L by day +15. In part II, high levels of circulating CD34(+) cells (> 20 cells/microL) were obtained in all four groups. The chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (< 1 x 10(9)/L) was similar in the four groups. Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg was more effective than filgrastim in reducing the number of patients with an ANC less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L on day +12 after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

A single injection of Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg might be the optimal dose for steady-state peripheral-blood progenitor cell mobilization. A single injection of 20, 60, or 100 microg/kg could be as efficient as daily administration of filgrastim to correct chemotherapy-induced cytopenia. The optimal dose of Ro 25-8315 should be determined according to the planned chemotherapy regimen.

Enhancement of the anti-tumor activity of a peripheral blood progenitor cell graft by mobilization with interleukin 2 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Autologous interleukin 2 (IL-2)-activated natural killer (NK) cells kill a broad spectrum of tumor targets, including breast cancer. We hypothesized that mobilization with IL-2 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) may enhance the anti-tumor activity of the graft in autograft recipients. We determined the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of subcutaneous IL-2 given with G-CSF for PBPC mobilization, the ability of IL-2 + G-CSF mobilized stem cells to reconstitute hematopoiesis, and the in vitro immunologic function of the graft in patients with advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AID METHODS: Forty-three women with stage IIIA/B or metastatic breast cancer underwent mobilization of PBPC with IL-2 administered subcutaneously for 14 days along with G-CSF for the latter 7 days. IL-2 was given in a dose-escalated manner, with the maximum tolerated dose determined to be 1.75 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day. Fifteen women with stage IIIA/B or metastatic breast cancer underwent G-CSF mobilization alone and served as a control group.

RESULTS

[corrected] Fifty-two percent of the patients mobilized with 1L-2 at the maximum tolerated dose reached the target number of CD34(+) cells for transplantation with three aphereses compared to 93% of control patients who were mobilized with G-CSF alone. [corrected] There was no significant impact on time to engraftment of neutrophils or platelets using either mobilization regimen. The addition of subcutaneous IL-2 to mobilization increased the cytotoxicity of IL-2-activated mononuclear cells from the PBPC product against the breast cancer cell target, MCF-7, and increased the percentage of NK cells and activated T cells in the PBPC product. The enhanced NK cell number was sustained in the early posttransplant period.

CONCLUSIONS

[corrected] IL-2 + G-CSF mobilization is safe, may lead to a more immunologically functional graft without impairing hematologic recovery, and thus merits further exploration to evaluate the clinical anti-tumor efficacy of these immunocompetent grafts. [corrected] Limitations of this combined approach to stem cell mobilization include a decrease in the number of CD34(+) cells mobilized with the combined cytokines and the short duration of the increased number of anti-tumor effector cells after transplant.

Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF

PURPOSE

To compare the toxicity and effects on hematologic recovery and circulating progenitor cell mobilization of three cytokine regimens administered after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m(2)), given as the first step of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (arm 1), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone (arm 2), or sequential interleukin-3 (IL-3) and GM-CSF (arm 3). Cytokines were administered as a single daily subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 to 6 microg/kg/d. Progenitor cells were evaluated in peripheral blood as well as in apheretic product as both CD34(+) cells and granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM).

RESULTS

Neutrophil recovery was faster in arm 1 as compared with arms 2 and 3 (P <.0001); no significant differences were observed between arms 2 and 3. In arm 3, a moderate acceleration of platelet recovery was observed, but it was statistically significant only as compared with arm 1 (P =.028). The peak of CD34(+) cells was hastened in a median of 2 days in arm 1 compared with arms 2 and 3 (P =.0002), whereas the median peak value of CD34(+) cells and CFU-GM was similar in the three patient groups. Administration of IL-3 and GM-CSF resulted in more significant toxicity requiring pharmacologic treatment in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The three cytokine regimens administered after HD-CTX are comparably effective in reducing hematologic toxicity and mobilizing the hematopoietic progenitor cells. G-CSF accelerates leukocyte recovery and progenitor mobilization. Although G-CSF-treated patients have somewhat slower platelet recovery, they definitely have fewer side effects.

The clinical role of growth factors in the treatment of breast cancer

Growth factors have had an increasingly strong impact in breast cancer management in recent years. The main role of growth factors, particularly hematopoietic growth factors, in this setting has been to promote better tolerance of standard-doses, and for the implementation of high-dose chemotherapy in innovative protocols. After a brief overview of growth factor biology, the current clinical guidelines for their use in cancer management is reviewed. Finally, the role growth factors in palliative and curative chemotherapy of breast cancer and methods to reduce tumor cell contamination of peripheral stem cell harvests will be discussed.

Dose-Intensified Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Present and Future Prospects

With the trend to maximize chemotherapy in breast cancer, the use of peripheral blood stem cells in addition to hematopoietic growth factors to alleviate myelosuppression caused by dose-intensified chemotherapy has been shown to be beneficial. In treatment of metastatic breast cancer, response rates and complete response rates as high as 100%and nearly 80%, respectively, have been reported. Such treatments have shown even greater promise in an adjuvant setting for high-risk breast cancer. High-dose chemotherapy studies, however, involve highly-selected patient populations who are generally compared with unselected patients, and controversy still surrounds the question of whether it is substantially superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy. There are now more than sufficient data to justify ongoing randomized trials, and the most important overall recommedation is to encourage patients to participate in these clinical trials.

CD34+ cell engraftment, ex vivo expansion, and malignant cell depletion following immunomagnetic selection

This review describes the published preclinical and clinical data on the use of a manual or semiautomated immunomagnetic selection device, termed the Isolex system. Preclinical evaluation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+ cells) selected from bone marrow, peripheral blood leukapheresis products, and umbilical cord blood is reviewed with respect to differentiation (CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-GEMM formation) and proliferation. The purities and yields of CD34+ cell products from clinical trials performed since 1994 are presented along with data on malignant cell depletion. On average, the Isolex system resulted in a final product median purity of 67% and a final product median yield of 64%. Positive selection of CD34+ cells with this device decreased residual tumor cell levels by 2-3 logs in autologous transplant products and reduced T cell levels by 3-4 logs in allogeneic grafts. To evaluate the clinical effect of these immunomagnetically selected cells, data on the rate of engraftment were reviewed. Autologous CD34+ cell transplantation resulted in recovery time from neutropenia (ANC > 500/microliter) of 9-14 days and recovery time from thrombocytopenia (platelet count > 20,000/microliter) of 10-20 days. These data showed that the Isolex system can positively select progenitor cells to reconstitute the hematopoietic system following myeloablative therapy.

Four-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor-cell support as induction treatment for patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Despite recent progress in modern chemotherapy, metastatic solid tumors still have a poor outcome. The delivery of increased dose intensities of cytotoxic agents could improve response rates. We assessed the feasibility and safety of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program in chemotherapy-naive patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (14 with carcinoma of unknown primary site, seven with metastatic breast cancer, six with small-cell lung cancer, and three with other diseases) were treated by an induction therapy regimen consisting of four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor cell and growth factor support. Peripheral blood progenitor cells were collected by apheresis as the leukocyte counts recovered from the nadir induced by the first cycle of chemotherapy (doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m2). Patients then received two cycles of etoposide (800 mg/m2) and carboplatin (900 mg/m2) separated by one cycle of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m2). G-CSF (5 microg/kg/d) was given until engraftment. Cycles were scheduled to be delivered every three weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 108 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Six patients went off study before the end of the program (three because of progressive disease, three because of toxicity). After the first cycle, a median number of 10 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (range 8-30) were collected. The median number of apheresis procedures was 1 (range 1-3). From cycle 2 to cycle 4, the median number of days when there was an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/microl increased from three to five, and the median number of days when the platelet count was less than 25,000/microl increased from three to six. Episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred in 36%, 50% and 46% of cycles during cycles 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The median numbers of days between cycle 1 and cycle 2, cycle 2 and cycle 3, cycle 3 and cycle 4 were 24 (range 20-30), 22 (range 20-36) and 22 (range 18-35), respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Non-hematologic toxicity included severe (WHO grades 3 or 4) nausea/vomiting in 19 (18%) cycles, mucositis in 8 (7%) cycles and diarrhea in 7 (6%) cycles.

CONCLUSION

Support with hematopoietic progenitor cells and growth factors allows the timely administration of repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients, resulting in a significant increase in dose intensity. Toxicity is noteworthy but manageable and does not compromise further therapy.

Prospective evaluation of bone marrow signal changes on magnetic resonance tomography during high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with breast cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors evaluate bone marrow signal changes on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).

METHODS

Fourteen patients with breast cancer without bone metastases underwent four sagittal MR imaging studies with T1-weighted, T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and inversion recovery sequences with short inversion time (STIR) of the lumbar spine: (1) during initial staging, (2) prior to high-dose chemotherapy after two cycles of induction chemotherapy, (3) early after PBSCT with a leukocyte exceeding 2000/microL, and (4) 6 to 8 weeks after PBSCT. Signal intensity ratios of averaged lumbar bone marrow to nucleus pulposus were measured and homogeneity was evaluated visually using a semiquantitative score.

RESULTS

Compared with the initial finding (1): Signal intensity ratios were altered significantly at (2): T1-weighted: -22% +/- 14, P < 0.001; T2-weighted: -11% +/- 11, P < 0.01; STIR: +33% +/- 31, P < 0.01; Signal intensity ratios were altered significantly at (3): T2-weighted: -23% +/- 12, P < 0.001, STIR: -22% +/- 23, P < 0.01; and Signal intensity ratios were altered significantly at (4): only STIR: -16% +/- 19, P < 0.01. Homogeneity scores decreased at (3) for T1-weighted and STIR sequences (-1.6 +/- 0.5 to -2.0 +/- 0.7, P < 0.01 and -1.0 +/- 0.5 to -1.4 +/- 0.5, P < 0.01, respectively) and at (4) for the latter sequence (-1.0 +/- 0.5 versus -1.4 +/- 0.5, P < 0.01). At (4), T1-weighted images were less homogenous than initially in 3 of 14 (21%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates significant alterations of bone marrow composition during PBSCT but allows differentiation of benign therapy-related changes from those known in metastatic disease after completion of PBSCT.

Optimising treatment outcomes: a review of current management strategies in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer remains an essentially incurable disease and chemotherapy, despite producing frequent and clinically useful responses, has had a disappointing impact on survival. Several highly promising lines of clinical research with new agents, combinations and dosages may yet produce an improved outcome. Of the new drugs that have been studied, the taxoids, docetaxel and paclitaxel appear to be the most active agents yet discovered in this setting; navelbine is also active. Investigations of high-dose chemotherapy have produced the highest rates of complete response achieved in patients with this condition. The results of recent randomised trials confirm the high activity of this modality and also suggest a survival advantage compared with more traditionally dosed treatment. Active research into biological therapy is also under way and vaccines, antibodies and inhibitors of growth factors are all being evaluated.

Standard-dose recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) allows safe and repeated administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (CEP)

High-dose chemotherapy often requires hematopoietic progenitor cell reinfusion, but drugs with extramedullary dose-limiting toxicity may be administered in the high-dose range by simple growth factor support. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of a three-drug high-dose regimen supported by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). Ten patients with histologically proven malignancy were enrolled. Eight had breast cancer, one non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and one a mediastinal tumor of unknown origin. The regimen included cyclophosphamide (C) 5 g/m2, etoposide (E) 1.5 g/m2, and cisplatin (P) 150 mg/m2 (CEP), administered in a 3-day schedule followed by rhG-CSF, 300 micrograms once a day, beginning from day +5 (36 h after the end of chemotherapy). The cycle was repeated as clinically needed up to three times. After the first course, hematologic recovery was rapid and complete without documented infections, and no relevant extramyeloid toxicities were observed. Eight of 10 patients received a second course with comparably low toxicity, and three of them received a third course. We concluded that CEP therapy can be administered safely and even repeatedly, by simple growth factor support, in good performance status cancer patients.

High-dose mitoxantrone with peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue: toxicity, pharmacokinetics and implications for dosage and schedule

The optimal use of mitoxantrone (NOV) in the high-dose range requires elucidation of its maximum tolerated dose with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support and the time interval needed between drug administration and PBPC reinfusion in order to avoid graft toxicity. The aims of this study were: (1) to verify the feasibility and haematological toxicity of escalating NOV up to 90 mg m(-2) with PBPC support; and (2) to verify the safeness of a short (96 h) interval between NOV administration and PBPC reinfusion. Three cohorts of ten patients with breast cancer (BC) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received escalating doses of NOV, 60, 75 and 90 mg m(-2) plus melphalan (L-PAM), 140-180 mg m(-2), with PBPC rescue 96 h after NOV. Haematological toxicity was evaluated daily (WHO criteria). NOV plasma pharmacokinetics was also evaluated, as well as NOV cytotoxicity against PBPCs. Haematological recovery was rapid and complete at each NOV dose level without statistically significant differences, and there were no major toxicities. NOV plasma concentrations at the time of PBPC reinfusion were below the toxicity threshold against haemopoietic progenitors. It is concluded that, when adequately supported with PBPCs, NOV can be escalated up to 90 mg m(-2) with acceptable haematological toxicity. PBPCs can be safely reinfused as early as 96 h after NOV administration.

The contribution of animal models to the development of treatments for hematologic recovery following myeloablative therapy: a review

This review describes the role that animal models have played in the development of clinical procedures for growth factor and hematopoietic cell therapies following high-dose cancer chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both. Data are discussed describing animal models that add to the understanding of human hematopoiesis, including myeloid and lymphoid lineage localization and in vivo maturation. Finally, current animal models of cytokine and cell therapies are presented in the context of their contributions to early clinical trials and future therapies. These studies underscore the past and current contributions animal investigations have made to improving clinical therapies.

Incidence and prevention of nonhaematological toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy

The introduction of the haematopoietic growth factors (HGFs), together with the evolution of techniques to harvest haematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood, have greatly facilitated the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). While haematological toxicity of HDC is no longer dose-limiting, damage to other tissues has become more pronounced. In fact, nonhaematological toxicity (NHTOX) is now often dose-limiting in HDC regimens. NHTOX associated with HDC regimens depends on the type and dose of the drugs used, the physical condition and the characteristics of the patients treated and the given comedication. We describe the most important toxic effects of commonly used HDC programmes, such as nausea, vomiting, and mucositis, neutropaenic fever and sepsis, various major organ toxicities, catheter-associated problems and long-term complications. In addition, we discuss the possibilities of preventing these side-effects and what action to take if they occur.

Epirubicin + G-CSF as peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) mobilising agents in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to mobilise peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from patients with breast cancer, Epirubicin supported with G-CSF was tested. Another aim of the study was also to optimize the procedure so that the number of leukapheresis procedures could be reduced. These cells were subsequently reinfused as hematologic rescue after high-dose chemotherapy programs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients received Epirubicin 150 mg/sqm + G-CSF at the dose of 5 micro/kg/bw s.c. daily, starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. Twelve had metastatic, eight inflammatory or locally advanced disease, and nine were treated in an adjuvant setting.

RESULTS

The median numbers of CD34+ cells and CFU-GM collected were 12.9 x 106/kg/bw and 111.7 x 10(4)/kg/bw, respectively. The mean number of leukapheresis procedures per patient was 1.8 +/- 0.3 (range 1-3), and the mean day of the first procedure was the tenth +/- 1 (range 8-13) after Epirubicin. The minimum required target for one high-dose procedure was collected in a single leukapheresis in 13 patients. Moreover, in 9 cases one procedure was adequate for two high-dose courses (i.e. > or = 10 x 10(6)/kg/bw CD34+ cells). Response to Epirubicin was evaluable in 14/20 cases, with a response rate of 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Epirubicin delivered at 150 mg/sqm is a very effective mobilising agent for breast cancer patients; to ameliorate the response rate other active drug(s) should be added.