Phase II and pharmacologic study of docetaxel as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Comparative study of dexamethasone premedication regimens with docetaxel chemotherapy in early HER-2 positive breast cancer: A safety net hospital experience

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel can cause fluid retention reactions (FRRs) and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The manufacturer recommends a multi-day oral dexamethasone premedication to prevent these toxicities, but steroid related side effects and regimen compliance remain a concern. This study aimed to determine if modified dexamethasone premedication regimens resulted in differences in HSRs or FRRs to docetaxel. We also examined side effects of dexamethasone and delays in chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 82 early breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel. Three steroid regimens were examined: IV 20 mg single-dose dexamethasone, or IV 12 mg dexamethasone with either dexamethasone 8 mg BID for three days starting the day before chemotherapy or dexamethasone 4 mg BID for three days following chemotherapy. Adverse effects, delays in chemotherapy, and reasons for delays in chemotherapy were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence and severity of FRRs and HSRs was low, with less than 10% incidence of HSRs or FRRs in any group. Delays were most common in the group receiving dexamethasone 8 mg BID for 3 days starting the day before chemotherapy (63.3%) (p < 0.05) and were most commonly due to patient noncompliance (26%).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of intravenous dexamethasone alone or followed by lower doses of oral dexamethasone may improve patient compliance and avoid delays in chemotherapy, without an increase in docetaxel toxicity.

Syndromes of Concurrent Hypertension, Diastolic Dysfunction, and Pulmonary or Peripheral Edema in Cardio-Oncology: Case Studies, Literature Review, and New Classification System

OPINION STATEMENT

Individuals who have ever been diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk for cardiovascular conditions during and after cancer treatment. Especially during cancer treatment, cardiovascular conditions can manifest in many ways, including peripheral or pulmonary edema. Edema can indicate volume overload affecting the heart even without other unequivocal evidence of apparent diastolic or systolic left ventricular dysfunction, particularly at rest. We propose a novel algorithm to streamline the diagnostic evaluation and cardiovascular classification for cancer patients with edema. We initially advise prompt evaluation with a chest X-ray and echocardiogram. We then suggest classification into one of five categories based on the timing of presentation of edema relative to cancer treatment, as well as echocardiography results and the presence or absence of hypertension or lymphatic causes of edema. This classification tool can then be utilized to guide further cardiovascular management suggestions. These concurrent syndromes presenting as edema may indicate the development or aggravation of undiagnosed diastolic dysfunction with or without hypertension, even if transiently present only while on cancer treatment.

A pharmacometrics model to define docetaxel target in early breast cancer

AIMS

We aimed to study the relation between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of docetaxel in early breast cancer and recommend a target exposure.

METHODS

A PK/PD study was performed in 27 early breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for 4 cycles followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel 75-100 mg/m² infused every 21 days. Individual Bayesian estimates of docetaxel PK parameters were obtained using a nonparametric population PK model developed with data from patients with metastatic breast cancer who received dose-intensified docetaxel (300-350 mg/m² ). Docetaxel area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) in each cycle and total cumulative AUC (AUCcum) were calculated and related to the incidence of adverse effects and tumour recurrence.

RESULTS

Docetaxel clearance showed no change over the 4 treatment cycles, but a gradual increase in the volume of distribution was observed. One third of the patients had at least 1 dose reduction of docetaxel due to toxicity. The mean AUC, AUCcum and Cmax in patients showing docetaxel-associated adverse events were significantly higher than in patients free of toxicity (P < .05). Fatigue and decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were related to docetaxel AUC and Cmax and pain to AUC. AUC and Cmax >4.5 mg*h/L and 3.5 mg/L, respectively, were risk factors for docetaxel toxicity, while an AUC <4.5 mg*h/L was associated with tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

We report for the first time a relation between docetaxel exposure and toxicity and recommend specific targets of drug exposure with implications for the clinical management of early breast cancer patients.

Review : Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the taxanes

Objectives. To review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel and paclitaxel.

Data Sources. We reviewed the literature through a MEDLINE search from 1982 to 1996. The terms docetaxel, paclitaxel, taxanes, and taxoids were used in the search. Relevant articles cited in literature obtained by MEDLINE searching, as well as new articles published in early 1997 in specific oncology journals, were also considered.

Data Extraction. We have reviewed the current literature with regard to the chemistry, mechanisms of action and pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clini cal use, adverse effects, drug interactions, formula tion, dosage, administration, and pharmaceutical is sues of the taxanes.

Conclusion. Both docetaxel and paclitaxel are novel antineoplastic agents with significant activity in many types of cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both agents are best characterized by a three-compartment disposition profile. However, the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, not docetaxel, are non-linear and can be described by a saturation process in distribution and elimination. The nonlinearity appears to be associated more frequently with shorter infusions and/or higher doses. There is evidence suggesting that the time duration of paclitaxel concentrations maintained above 0.1 μM/L (T>0.1 μM ) is associated with improved survival and development of toxicity. On the other hand, currently there is no information relating opti mal systemic exposure of docetaxel to efficacy and toxicity. In addition, these pharmacokinetic-pharma codynamic relationship may change with therapy with antineoplastic agents and other agents adminis tered concurrently, and necessitates additional phar macokinetic-pharmacodynamic investigations.

Docetaxel in hepatic impairment

Purpose. The primary objective of this paper is to provide a brief overview of docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, and drug interactions, concentrating on their relationship with docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Sources. The literature was reviewed through a MEDLINE search from 1986 to 2000. Relevant articles cited in literature obtained by MEDLINE searching were also considered. The following terms were searched: hepatic impairment, liver failure, Taxotere, and docetaxel. The search was restricted to the English language.

Data Extraction. The current literature is reviewed in regard to docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing, efficacy, adverse effects, and drug interactions and with a special emphasis on docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Synthesis. Docetaxel has a wide spectrum of clinical activity and is used frequently in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, NSCLC, ovarian cancer and cancer of the head and neck. The dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel is neutropenia. Docetaxel is metabolized in the liver and elevations in hepatic enzymes can predict a reduced clearance of docetaxel, which is associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling, docetaxel can be safely administered in patients with elevated hepatic enzymes if the dose is reduced on the first cycle.

A phase II study of docetaxel and vinorelbine plus filgrastim for HER-2 negative, stage IV breast cancer: SWOG S0102

Docetaxel and vinorelbine have demonstrated Single-agent activity in breast cancer. Preclinical studies suggest potential synergy between these antitubulin chemotherapy agents. This study evaluates these drugs in combination in metastatic breast cancer. Taxane-naive patients with HER-2 negative, stage IV breast cancer without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were eligible. Docetaxel (60 mg/m²) was given intravenously on Day 1, vinorelbine (27.5 mg/m²) intravenously on Days 8 and 15, and filgrastim on Days 2–21 of a 21-day cycle. The primary study outcome was one-year overall survival (OS), with secondary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicity. Of 95 patients registered, 92 were eligible and received treatment. One-year OS was 74 % (95 % CI 64–82 %) with a median OS of 22.3 months (95 % CI 18.8–31.4 months). One-year PFS was 34 % (95 % CI 24–43 %) with median of 7.2 months (95 % CI 6.4–10.3). OS at 2 and 3 years were 49 % (95 % CI 38–59 %) and 30 % (95 % CI 21–40 %), respectively. OS was poorer for women with estrogen-receptor negative disease (n = 32) compared to estrogen-receptor positive (n = 60) (log-rank p = 0.031), but PFS was not significantly different (p = 0.11). RR was 59 % among the 74 patients with measurable disease. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were 48 and 16 %, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was 12 % and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was 3 %. Common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue (14 %), pneumonitis (10 %), and dyspnea (9 %). The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine is an active first-line chemotherapy in HER-2 nonoverexpressing, metastatic breast cancer. This combination is associated with significant hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. The safety profile and expense of the filgrastim limit recommendations for routine use.

Taxane chemotherapy treatment for metastatic breast cancer

SUMMARY The taxanes, paclitaxel, docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel, are among the most active cytotoxic agents for treatment of breast cancer. Significant progress has been made in addressing taxane dose and schedule in both early-stage and metastatic disease. Several studies have clarified the role of retreatment with taxanes in recurrent breast cancer patients previously treated with taxane-containing regimens. In addition, the advent of nab-paclitaxel, designed to reduce allergic reactions and enhance drug delivery to tumor cells, has provided additional therapeutic options. This article summarizes the uses of taxanes in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Ethnic differences in drug susceptibility and toxicity are a major concern, not only in drug development but also in the clinical setting. We review the toxicity profiles of docetaxel according to dose and ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed phase II and III clinical trials that included a once-every-3-weeks single-agent docetaxel arm. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant variables affecting the reported incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified studies conducted in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 19.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.64-99.0] and docetaxel dose (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) as independent variables for the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference in the incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia between Asian and non-Asian clinical studies. Physicians and pharmacists should consider ethnic diversity in docetaxel toxicity when interpreting the results of clinical trials.

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase II Study of Axitinib Plus Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Purpose

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study assessed safety and efficacy of axitinib plus docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

Women with MBC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive docetaxel 80 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg twice per day (combination arm) or placebo (placebo arm), following a lead-in phase I trial. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP).

Results

In all, 168 patients were enrolled; 112 were randomly assigned to axitinib and 56 to placebo. Median TTP was numerically longer in the combination arm than in the placebo arm (8.1 v 7.1 months), but this difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.87; one-sided P = .156). The difference in median TTP was greatest among patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (9.2 v 7.0 months; P = .043, prespecified subgroup analysis). Objective response rate was higher in the combination arm (41.1% v 23.6%; P = .011). The most common grades 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (combination/placebo) included diarrhea (10.8%/0%), fatigue (10.8%/5.4%), stomatitis (12.6%/1.8%), mucositis (9.0%/0%), asthenia (7.2%/0%), and hypertension (4.5%/0%). Three patients in the combination arm experienced serious thromboembolic events (one death). Febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the combination arm (15.3% v 7.1%); rates of other hematologic toxicities were comparable. Increased toxicity with axitinib was generally managed by dose reduction and/or growth factor support.

Conclusion

The addition of axitinib to docetaxel did not improve TTP in first-line MBC treatment. Combination therapy may be more effective in patients previously exposed to adjuvant chemotherapy.

CYP3A4 expression to predict treatment response to docetaxel for metastasis and recurrence of primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

Tumors expressing high levels of CYP3A4 are likely to have a poor treatment response to docetaxel (DOC), which is metabolized by CYP3A4. Tissue samples of recurrent breast cancer are sometimes hard to obtain just before treatment because the tumor is often difficult to access. Using immunohistochemistry, we measured CYP3A4 expression in primary lesions and compared their treatment responses to DOC with those of recurrent breast cancer lesions.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 42 patients who had undergone surgery for breast cancer, and had metastasis or recurrence treated by DOC (60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks). Tumor samples resected at surgery were immunostained for CYP3A4 and its expression levels were compared with the response rate to ongoing DOC treatment.

RESULTS

Patients with CYP3A4-negative tumors (n = 19) showed a significantly higher response rate (63.2%) to DOC treatment than did those with CYP3A4-positive tumors (n = 23) (26.1%). The predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of CYP3A4 expression in the prediction response to DOC were 63.2%, 73.9%, and 68.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring CYP3A4 expression immunohistochemically in the primary breast cancer lesion was useful for predicting the treatment response to DOC of tumors that recurred after a long interval.

Safety and efficacy of a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unknown primary cancer

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of unknown primary cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria included histologic evidence of carcinoma originating in an unknown primary organ, no prior chemotherapy, age range 20 to 75 years, WHO PS < or =3, measurable or evaluable lesions, and adequate organ function. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2) followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m2) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Patients were assessed for tumor response after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and 4 additional cycles were administered unless disease progression was demonstrated.

RESULTS

Between September 1997 and September 2002, 45 patients were enrolled. The median age was 56.5 years (28-73 years), and their performance status (PS) were 0 (11 patients), 1 (26 patients), and 2 (6 patients), respectively, (2 patients were removed from the trial after initial enrollment). A total of 26 patients (60%) presented with lymphadenopathy, 14 patients (33%) with visceral disease, and 3 (7%) with bone and soft-tissue metastases. The overall response rate was 65.1% (4 complete response, 24 partial response, 8 NC, 7 progressive diseases: 95% confidence interval, 48.0-78.4). The median time to progression was 5.0 months. The median survival time was 11.8 months. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Commonly observed side effects included neutropenia (grade 3-4, 16 patients), nausea (grade 3, 13 patients), and nephrotoxicity (grade 2, 5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is a safe and effective regimen for patients with unknown primary cancer.

Skin toxicity as a risk factor for major infections in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel

Docetaxel-related skin toxicity, oral and gastrointestinal mucosal toxicity, and changes in blood cell counts were investigated as predictive factors for major infections in 143 women treated with 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m2) as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer in a randomized trial. Each patient with a major infection (n = 37) was compared with two controls. Skin toxicity (odds ratio 2.97, 95% CI 1.37-6.47), oral mucositis (1.98, CI 1.30-3.04), and the leukocyte nadir (0.12, CI 0.02-0.51) were significantly associated with a major infection in a univariate logistic regression analysis. In a multivariate analysis, skin toxicity was the only independent factor predictive for grade 3 to 4 infection (2.75, CI 1.00-7.58). A major infection was diagnosed in 62% (8 out of 13) of the docetaxel cycles in severely (grade 4) leukopenic patients who had grade 2 to 4 skin toxicity. Major infections are common in leukopenic patients who develop docetaxel-associated skin toxicity, and leukopenic patients presenting with docetaxel-induced skin toxicity may be candidates for prophylactic anti-infection measures such as prophylactic therapy with hematopoietic growth factors.

Activity of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic breast cancer with primary resistance to taxanes

Primary drug resistance, defined as disease progression as best response to treatment, presents an important problem in everyday clinical practice. Primary taxane resistance, reported in up to 55% of patients with breast cancer, plays a critical role in minimizing the efficacy of taxane-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The epothilones are a novel class of antineoplastic agents, developed to overcome tumor-resistance mechanisms. Ixabepilone, the first drug in this class, stabilizes microtubule polymerization, and induces cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Ixabepilone demonstrates low susceptibility to different and multiple mechanisms of drug resistance that play a crucial role in primary taxane resistance, such as tumor overexpression of neuronal-specific beta-tubulin isotype III and drug-efflux transporters. In phase II trials, ixabepilone demonstrated proven activity in patients with MBC whose tumors had primary or secondary resistance to taxanes and other agents. Ixabepilone also demonstrated activity in patients with tumor types such as renal-cell cancer and pancreatic cancer that are usually intrinsically insensitive to chemotherapy, including taxanes. To determine the activity of ixabepilone in patients with primary taxane resistance, a retrospective analysis of patient subsets from 2 clinical trials was conducted. Ixabepilone demonstrated clinical activity as monotherapy, and in combination with capecitabine, in patients with MBC who had disease progression as best response to previous taxane therapy. Response rates in patients with primary taxane resistance were comparable to responses observed in total patient populations. The clinical results support the hypothesis that ixabepilone can overcome or circumvent primary mechanisms of resistance to taxanes and other chemotherapeutic agents.

A phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer was investigated. In addition, the efficacy of a 3-day prophylaxis against cumulative dose-related fluid retention was examined with methylprednisolone 32 mg twice daily for 3 days starting 12 and 3 h before the docetaxel infusion together with oral cetirizine 10 mg 12 and 3 h before start of docetaxel for prevention of acute hypersensitivity reactions. According to the intent to treat-analysis 35% (95%CI: 25; 46) of the 94 patients entered responded to therapy. Their median survival was 12 months (range 0-20 months). The respective response rate for the 87 patients eligible for response evaluation was 37% (95%CI: 27; 48). Their median duration of response was 8 months (range 3-12 months), their median time to progression was 4 months (range 1-12 months). The corresponding response rate in the eligible patient cohort with anthracycline-resistant disease was 28% (95%CI: 15; 45) and increased to 44% (95%CI: 30; 59) in the cohort with non-anthracycline-resistant disease. Patients with visceral metastases responded in 36% and patients with > or = 3 organs involved in 33%. In a retrospective analysis, the 3-day premedication of corticosteroids and antihistamines proved to be as effective as the established but more toxic 5-day regimen in delaying and preventing the occurrence of docetaxel derived toxicities especially the cumulative fluid retention. In conclusion, docetaxel represents one of the most active agents for second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, especially for anthracycline-resistant patients. Due to comparable effectiveness of the 5-day regimen which is widely used by others and the 3-day premedication tested in this trial the latter proved to be more favourable and was therefore recommended for future therapies.

Clinical pharmacology and use of microtubule-targeting agents in cancer therapy

The microtubule-targeting agents have made significant contributions to cancer therapy over the past 50 years. The vinca alkaloids and taxanes have been used to treat a broad range of malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas and many types of solid tumors. The taxanes have been frequently used in the treatment of advanced ovarian, breast, lung, head and neck, and prostate cancer, and they are increasingly being used in early stage disease. This chapter reviews the pharmacology, clinical indications, and toxicities associated with the vinca alkaloids and taxanes.

Phase I trial of intravesical docetaxel in the management of superficial bladder cancer refractory to standard intravesical therapy

PURPOSE

Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for superficial bladder cancer will experience recurrence. Response rates to second-line intravesical therapies range from 20% to 40%. For these high-risk patients, novel agents are necessary to prevent recurrence. Docetaxel is a microtubule depolymerization inhibitor with unique physiochemical properties, making it an excellent candidate for investigation as an intravesical agent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I trial included patients with recurrent Ta, T1, and Tis transitional cell carcinoma who experienced treatment failure with at least one prior intravesical treatment. Docetaxel was administered as six weekly instillations at a starting dose of 5 mg, with a dose-escalation model used until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD. Efficacy was evaluated by cystoscopy with biopsy, cytology, and computed tomography imaging.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (100%) completed the trial, and the distribution of stages included six patients with Tis, seven with Ta, and five with T1 disease. No grade 3 or 4 DLTs occurred in 108 infusions, and no patient had systemic absorption of docetaxel. Eight (44%) of 18 patients experienced grade 1 or 2 toxicities, with dysuria being the most common. Ten (56%) of 18 patients had no evidence of disease at their post-treatment cystoscopy and biopsy. None of the patients who experienced relapse had disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Intravesical docetaxel exhibited minimal toxicity and no systemic absorption in the first human intravesical clinical trial. This suggests that docetaxel is a safe agent for further evaluation of efficacy in a phase II trial.

Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the effect of adding docetaxel (T) to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) on breast cancer response rates and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with operable breast cancer (N = 2,411) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative AC followed by surgery, AC followed by T and surgery, or AC followed by surgery and then T. Tamoxifen was initiated concurrently with chemotherapy. Median time on study for 2,404 patients with follow-up was 77.9 months.

RESULTS

Addition of T to AC did not significantly impact DFS or OS. There were trends toward improved DFS with addition of T. The addition of T reduced the incidence of local recurrences as first events (P = .0034). Preoperative T, but not postoperative T, significantly improved DFS in patients who had a clinical partial response after AC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.91; P = .007). Pathologic complete response, which was doubled by addition of preoperative T, was a significant predictor of OS regardless of treatment (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.47; P < .0001). Pathologic nodal status after chemotherapy was a significant predictor of OS (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of preoperative or postoperative T after preoperative AC did not significantly affect OS, slightly improved DFS, and decreased the incidence of local recurrences. The sample size of this study was not sufficient to yield significance for the moderate DFS improvement. Concurrent use of tamoxifen may have limited the impact of adding T.

Study of the effect of standardized chemotherapy order forms on prescribing errors and anti-emetic cost

OBJECTIVES

Many anti-neoplastic medication errors and excessive use of serotonin antagonist anti-emetic agents might be prevented by the use of a standardized chemotherapy order form (SCOF). Several studies showing a reduction in prescribing errors or control of inappropriate anti-emetic use through the use of SCOFs have been reported. No previously published study reported SCOFs were used to reduce both prescribing errors and anti-emetic cost. This study attempts to measure these outcomes in a haematology-oncology pharmacy service.

METHODS

The study consisted of a four-month control period, followed by a four-month test period following dissemination of the standardized order forms. In each period, prescriber errors and anti-emetic use were monitored. During the control period, using clinical studies from the primary literature and anti-emetic guidelines, 64 SCOFs representing the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens in the medical oncology and gynaecology oncology services were developed by the haematology-oncology pharmacy. Differences in prescribing error rate and anti-emetic cost were compared between each period and with the institution's historic prescribing error rate.

RESULTS

During the control period, 1078 orders for oral and parenteral granisetron and ondansetron with combined total acquisition cost of $76 454.64 and a mean cost of $70.92 were dispensed. During the test period, the pharmacy dispensed 1121 orders with an acquisition cost of $73 331.61 and a mean cost of $65.42. A savings of $3123.03 resulted from a reduction of the amount prescribed in the test period. The difference in mean cost per order between the two periods was significant (P <0.037). Fifty-three prescribing errors out of 3592 medication orders were detected in the control period, while 12 errors out of 3585 medication orders were detected during the test period. A significant difference(P <0.0001) was detected between the two periods. There was a significant difference (P <0.0001) between the control period and the institution's historic prescribing error rate and no difference between the test period and the institution's historic prescribing error rate.

CONCLUSION

SCOFs significantly reduced serotonin antagonist anti-emetic cost and prescribing error rate over a four-month period.

Phase II to III Study Comparing Doxorubicin and Docetaxel With Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Dutch Community Setting Trial for the Clinical Trial Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

Patients (n = 216) were randomly assigned to either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2and docetaxel 75 mg/m2) or FAC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2); both regimens were administered on day 1, every 3 weeks.

Results

A median number of six cycles was delivered in both arms, with a median relative dose-intensity of more than 98%. Median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly longer for patients on AT compared with FAC (TTP: 8.0 v 6.6 months, respectively; P = .004; and OS: 22.6 v 16.2 months, respectively; P = .019). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients on AT compared with FAC (58% v 37%, respectively; P = .003). The ORR on AT was also higher in patients with visceral disease compared with FAC patients with visceral disease (59% v 36%, respectively; P = .003). There were no differences in grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and infections (AT 89% v FAC 84% and AT 12% v FAC 9%, respectively). Neutropenic fever was more common in AT-treated patients than FAC-treated patients (33% v 9%, respectively; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both arms. Congestive heart failure was observed in 3% and 6% of patients on AT and FAC, respectively.

Conclusion

In this phase II to III study, AT resulted in a significantly longer TTP and OS and a higher objective ORR than FAC. First-line AT is a valid treatment option for patients with MBC.

A phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: NCCTG study N9932

OBJECTIVE

A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted, provided that at least 12 months had elapsed between any prior taxane and platinum therapy. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml.min every 21 days until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity.

RESULTS

All 53 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was 6. Overall response rate was 60%, with 3 complete responses (6%) and 29 partial responses (54%). Median time to disease progression was 9.6 months. Median survival time was 20.4 months. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 94% of patients and 15% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. The overall incidence (grades 1-3) of neurosensory toxicity was 57% and neuromotor toxicity was 25%, respectively, with grade 3 toxicity occurring in 4% of patients each.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is highly active in metastatic breast cancer. Prophylactic growth factor support is recommended in any further evaluation of this combination in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Weekly Docetaxel in Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase I-II Study

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of weekly docetaxel administration in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In phase I, cohorts of 3 women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer were treated with a 1-hour infusion of docetaxelat 30, 35, 40 mg/m2/week after premedication with two doses of dexamethazone 8 mg 12 h apart. Subsequently, a cohort of 28 women was treated at the MTD for 24 consecutive weeks in a phase II setting and was assessed for toxicity and activity.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated at each of the first two dose levels; 9 patients were treated at the 3rd level (40 mg/m2/week). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced at that level by 2/6 patients of the first two accrued groups and in 2/3 patients of the 3rd (confirmation) group, thus establishing the subsequent phase II dose at 35 mg/m2/week. Two out of 28 evaluable patients (7.1%, 95% CI 0-16.7) showed complete responses, whereas 8 (28.6%, 95% CI 11.8-45.3) showed partial responses, and an objective response rate of 35.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 18-53.5%). In addition, 8 patients (28.6%) had stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival were 5 (range 1-15) and 15 months (95% CI 7-23), respectively. One patient experienced 1 episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Severe asthenia was the main reason for interruption of chemotherapy (10 patients, 35.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the sustained weekly administration of docetaxel, even though it demonstrated an activity similar to a 3-weekly schedule could not be maintained for the planned 24 weeks due to the progressive emergence of nonhematological side effects that approached DLTs.

First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined treatment with docetaxel-cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Consecutive eligible chemonaive patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, with prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) on days 4-11. Thirty-two patients (64%) had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy; these included 16 (32%) who had received anthracyclines. In 50 evaluable patients with a median age (range) of 56 (31-72) years, the overall response rate was 68% (95% CI, 55-81%), with 7 (14%) complete and 27 (54%) partial responses. Stable and progressive disease was observed in 10 (20%), and 6 (12%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 10 months, and the median time to progression was 39 weeks. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity included--neutropenia in 9 patients (18%), anemia in 2 (4%) and thrombocytopenia in 1 (2%). One patient (2%) with febrile neutropenia required hospitalization. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 18%, nephrotoxicity in 14%, asthenia (4%), and neurotoxicity (2%). Toxicity was common in older patients (>56 years). There were no treatment-related deaths. A combination of docetaxel-cisplatin with rHuG-CSF support is well tolerated and effective as first-line chemotherapy in MBC.

Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study

PURPOSE To compare the clinical and pathologic response rates of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with doxorubicin and docetaxel (AD) as primary chemotherapy in women with primary or locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with histologically proven breast cancer with primary tumors >/= 3 cm, inflammatory or locally advanced disease, and no evidence of metastases were randomly assigned to receive a maximum of six cycles of either doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks or doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) IV every 3 weeks, followed by surgery on completion of chemotherapy. Results A total of 363 patients were randomly assigned to AC (n = 180) or AD (n = 183). A complete clinical response was observed in 17% and 20% of patients treated with AC and AD, respectively (P = .42). Overall (complete and partial) clinical response rates for AC and AD were 61% and 70%, respectively (P = .06). There was no significant difference in either the pathologic complete response rates in the breast with AC (24%) and AD (21%; P = .61) or in the number of patients with positive axillary nodes at surgery with AC (61%) and AD (66%; P = .28). At a median follow-up of 32 months, there is no significant difference between the two groups for the number of relapses. CONCLUSION In contrast to the positive results reported for sequential docetaxel after AC as primary chemotherapy of breast cancer, our data do not suggest a benefit for simultaneous AD over AC.

High efficacy and low toxicity of weekly docetaxel given as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is one of the most effective antitumor agents currently available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II multicenter study prospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel given on a weekly schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received docetaxel, 35 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. Subsequent cycles (3 weeks of treatment, 2 weeks of rest) were given until a maximum of 5 cycles or disease progression. Premedication consisted of 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously 30 min prior to the infusion of docetaxel.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients at a median age of 58 years with previously untreated MBC were included in the study. A median of 10 doses (median cumulative dose 339 mg/m(2)) was administered (range: 2-18). The overall response rate was 48.1% (95% CI: 34-61%, intent-to-treat). Median survival was 15.8 months and median time to progression was 5.9 months (intent-to-treat). Hematological toxicity was mild with absence of neutropenia-related complications. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 3.7% of patients and grade 3 and 4 anemia was observed in 5.6 and 1.9% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The weekly administration of docetaxel is highly efficient and safe as first-line treatment for MBC and may serve as an important treatment option specifically in elderly patients and patients with a reduced performance status.

Prospective evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile of docetaxel in the elderly

PURPOSE

To prospectively study the pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile of docetaxel in elderly patients with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Docetaxel was administered at a dose 75 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks to 25 elderly cancer patients aged >/= 65 years and 26 cancer patients aged younger than 65 years. Pharmacokinetic studies and toxicity assessments were performed during the first cycle of therapy.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients treated, 20 aged >/= 65 years (median, 71 years; range, 65 to 80 years) and 20 aged younger than 65 years (median, 53 years; range, 26 to 64 years) were assessable for pharmacokinetic studies, and 39 were assessable for toxicity. Patient characteristics were similar (P >/= .15) between the two cohorts. Mean docetaxel clearance was not altered in the elderly versus younger patients: 30.1 L/h (standard deviation [SD] 18.3 L/h) v 30.0 L/h (SD, 14.8 L/h; P = .98). The percentage of patients with grade 4 and febrile neutropenia was higher in the elderly (63% and 16%, respectively) versus younger (30% and 0%, respectively) cohort, although this observation did not reach a level of statistical significance (P = .056). From logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for a patient aged 65 years was 1.98 for developing grade 4 neutropenia compared with a patient aged 50 years (P = .091).

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel plasma pharmacokinetics are unaltered in elderly patients. Patients aged >/= 65 years appear to be more sensitive to docetaxel-induced neutropenia.

Docetaxel: a new active agent in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, accounting for about 18% of female cancers, and over half a million new cases are diagnosed worldwide each year. Its incidence increases with age and is currently rising. Although the increased availability of screening programs has allowed earlier detection and treatment of primary breast cancers, many patients relapse with metastases after apparently successful treatment of their primary tumor and over 15,000 women in the UK and about 50,000 in the USA die from advanced disease each year. The natural course of breast cancer is very variable even after the development of metastases, and depends on a variety of tumor characteristics and prognostic factors. This is reflected in the large number of treatments currently employed. However, despite this wide choice and considerable research over the years, treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) prolongs average survival times only slightly. Current therapy is aimed at achieving a balance between producing maximal tumor shrinkage to produce the most effective possible palliation of symptoms, and minimizing adverse effects. Anticancer chemotherapy is the preferred option in patients who do not respond to hormones, those with hormone-independent tumors, those with aggressive breast cancer subtypes. A variety of anticancer chemotherapy regimens, using both single and combined agents, have been shown to be effective in achieving tumor regression in MBC. Anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin) are the most active of the established monotherapies, typically producing response rates of 50-60% during initial (first-line) treatment for metastatic disease, but being effective in fewer than 25% of patients requiring second-line therapy. The drawbacks of anthracyclines include dose-limiting cumulative cardiotoxicity and the development of resistant tumor clones after the use of anthracyclines for adjuvant or first-line therapy, especially if subsequent courses are required within a year. The success of these established chemotherapeutic agents depends greatly on the number and location of metastatic sites. Lymph node and soft tissue secondaries tend to respond well, while visceral metastases (especially in the liver) carry a particularly poor prognosis despite treatment. The outlook for patients with metastases involving more than two organ systems is also bleak. Although some patients can live for years with metastatic disease, the average survival time in patients with MBC is 18-24 months, while in those with liver metastases, life expectancy averages only 6 months. High-dose anticancer chemotherapy with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or autologous bone marrow transplantation has allowed the dose intensity of anthracyclines to be increased, and has improved the response rate to about 70% in selected patients with MBC. However, this approach has not been proven to improve survival, involves the risk of greater toxicity and drug-related mortality, and patients with reduced clearance of anthracyclines due to hepatic dysfunction from liver metastases may not be suitable candidates. A number of new anticancer agents have also recently been introduced in an attempt to improve on the performance and avoid the tolerability problems associated with anthracyclines. Among these, antitubulin agents (taxoids and vinorelbine) have shown highly promising activity in MBC. This paper reviews the preclinical, phase I and phase II data for one taxoid, docetaxel. Docetaxel (Taxotere) belongs to the taxoid class of cytotoxic agents, the development of which began more than 20 years ago. In 1971, paclitaxel (Taxol) was identified as the active compound of the crude extract of the bark of the Pacific Yew tree Taxus brevifolia. However, at that time the development of paclitaxel was hampered because of the limited source of the drug and difficulties with isolation, extraction and formulation. The second active taxoid, docetaxel, was isolated by Potier et al. in 1986. Docetaxel is prepared from a non-cytotoxic precursor, extracted from the needles of the European Yew tree Taxus baccata, that is condensed with a chemically-synthesized side-chain. As the docetaxel precursor is freely available because of the regenerating capacity of the needles the development of docetaxel has thus been rapid.

Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Docetaxel: Dosing Based on Body-Surface Area Compared With Individualized Dosing Based on Cytochrome P450 Activity Estimated Using a Urinary Metabolite of Exogenous Cortisol

Purpose

Docetaxel is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) enzyme, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is correlated with neutropenia. We developed a novel method for estimating the interpatient variability of CYP3A4 activity by the urinary metabolite of exogenous cortisol (6-beta-hydroxycortisol [6-β-OHF]). This study was designed to assess whether the application of our method to individualized dosing could decrease pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability compared with body-surface area (BSA) –based dosing.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-nine patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to either the BSA-based arm or individualized arm. In the BSA-based arm, 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel was administered. In the individualized arm, individualized doses of docetaxel were calculated from the estimated clearance (estimated clearance = 31.177 + [7.655 × 10−4 × total 6-β-OHF] − [4.02 × alpha-1 acid glycoprotein] − [0.172 × AST] − [0.125 × age]) and the target AUC of 2.66 mg/L · h.

Results

In the individualized arm, individualized doses of docetaxel ranged from 37.4 to 76.4 mg/m2 (mean, 58.1 mg/m2). The mean AUC and standard deviation (SD) were 2.71 (range, 2.02 to 3.40 mg/L · h) and 0.40 mg/L · h in the BSA-based arm, and 2.64 (range, 2.15 to 3.07 mg/L · h) and 0.22 mg/L · h in the individualized arm, respectively. The SD of the AUC was significantly smaller in the individualized arm than in the BSA-based arm (P < .01). The percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) averaged 87.1% (range, 59.0 to 97.7%; SD, 8.7) in the BSA-based arm, and 87.4% (range, 78.0 to 97.2%; SD, 6.1) in the individualized arm, suggesting that the interpatient variability in percent decrease in ANC was slightly smaller in the individualized arm.

Conclusion

The individualized dosing method based on the total amount of urinary 6-β-OHF after cortisol administration can decrease PK variability of docetaxel.

Response of bilateral choroidal metastases of breast cancer to therapy with trastuzumab

Intraocular metastases, especially those of the choroidal plexus, are not common in metastatic breast cancer patients and are typically associated with a poor prognosis and impaired quality of life. A 45-year-old woman with breast cancer overexpressing HER2 and metastasizing to choroidal plexus, lymph nodes and skin received a combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment. Subsequently, at progression, trastuzumab was reintroduced together with vinorelbine. Administration of trastuzumab with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine led to a rapid improvement of the ocular symptoms, associated with a rapid objective response of all metastatic lesions and a prompt improvement in the quality of life. Choroidal metastases from breast cancer overexpressing HER2 are responsive to trastuzumab and chemotherapy (paclitaxel or vinorelbine). The susceptibility of ocular metastases to this approach seems different to that of other sanctuary disease sites.

Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Doxifluridine(5'-DFUR)is converted to its metabolite 5-FU by the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase(TP). TP is expressed significantly higher in tumor tissue than in normal tissue. Capecitabine(N4-pentoxylcarbonyl -5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine)is a pro-drug of 5'-DFUR and a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-FU preferentially in tumor tissue through a three-step enzymatic cascade. Expression of TP in tumor tissue may clinically predict efficacy of capecitabine. Induction of TP activity has brought about enhancement of capecitabine efficacy by taxanes in human cancer xenografts. In addition, a phase III study directly comparison docetaxel monotherapy and docetaxel plus capecitabine has been conducted for metastatic breast cancer patients who had received anthracyclines. The overall response rate of the combination group was 42%(n=255), and that of the monotherapy group was 30%(n=256)(p=0.006). The primary endpoints were time to disease progression, and time to treatment failure, and these parameters were superior in the combination arm than in the single arm, suggesting that capecitabine sensitization by docetaxel might be a new approach to breast cancer treatment.

Liver metastases from breast cancer: management of patients with significant liver dysfunction

The liver is a common site of metastases in breast cancer. Although the development of liver metastases has long been associated with a poor prognosis in this disease, this dogma has been challenged by more recent data, perhaps reflecting some treatment and other technological advances achieved in the last decade. Nevertheless, the specific population of breast cancer patients presenting with liver disease and associated liver dysfunction remain poorly studied. These women still seem to have a poor prognosis as compared to other patients with liver metastases. This is further complicated by the fact that the most active cytotoxic agents in breast cancer have significant hepatic metabolism and/or biliary excretion. Unfortunately, since these patients have been most of the time excluded from clinical trials, there are currently no clear recommendations for the management of such dramatic presentations. With some exceptions, recommendations for dose adjustments have also been largely empirical. In this paper, we review the optimal doses of cytotoxics used in this clinical situation and provide some tips on the management of these patients, based on the limited data currently available in the literature.

A Multicenter Phase II Study of Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is an active agent as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer at a dosage of 100 mg/m2. However, the efficacy of this agent as a first-line drug when used at a lower dosage is unclear. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 60 mg/m2 docetaxel for the treatment of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 23 patients with advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer, who had not been treated with an anthracycline or taxane previously. Treatment with docetaxel was continued in patients showing a response until there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Among 20 fully evaluated patients, the overall response rate was 50.0% and the median time to progression was 31 weeks. The most commonly observed adverse events were neutropenia (78.2%) and fatigue (60.9%). Fluid retention occurred in only 8.7% of the patients. Adverse events did not cause discontinuation of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel achieved good disease control with mild adverse events in first-line treatment at a dosage of 60 mg/m2.

Phase II Study of Feasibility of Dose-Dense FEC Followed by Alternating Weekly Taxanes in High-Risk, Four or More Node-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a potentially superior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, we conducted a pilot study of dose-dense 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by weekly alternating taxanes. The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of the regimen; the secondary objective was to estimate the disease-free and overall survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with >/=4 node-positive breast cancer were studied. Treatment consisted of FEC at 500/100/500 mg/m(2), respectively, x6 at two-week intervals with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, followed by weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) alternating with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) x18.

RESULTS

Between November 2001 and January 2003, 44 patients were enrolled. Median age was 46 years (range, 26-63 years), median number of positive nodes was 9 (range, 4-32), and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.6-11.0 cm). Because of unexpected toxicities, the study was stopped when 17 (39%) had fully completed all of the planned treatment. Two of 17 (12%) developed grade 4 pericardial/grade 3 bilateral pleural effusions at treatment completion; both required pericardial window. The remaining patients were treated with taxanes using one of several standard dose and schedule combinations. Furthermore, 4 of 44 (9%) developed pneumonitis attributed to the FEC regimen. Hospital admissions were required for 12 of 44 (27%); 3 of 44 (7%) required blood transfusions. There were no treatment related deaths. Median disease-free and overall survival will not be estimatable because of early closure of study.

CONCLUSION

FEC x6 at 2-week intervals followed by 18 weeks of alternating taxanes is not feasible at the doses tested. Other strategies are needed to improve adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel in frail and/or elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in 47 frail and/or elderly patients who were ineligible for the standard 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m) regimen. Reasons for ineligibility to the latter were age > or = 70 years (10 patients), poor hematological reserves (15 patients), impaired liver function (eight patients), intolerance to previous taxanes administered 3-weekly without demonstrated resistance (five patients) or any combination of these reasons (nine patients). There was a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and more than 60% had a WHO performance score at baseline of 2-3. A total of 408 weekly administrations were given over a period of 525 weeks (78% of the intended dose intensity) and the median cumulative dose of docetaxel per patient was 278 mg/m. The incidence of serious adverse events was low. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in six patients and grade 4 in four patients. Of these 10 patients, eight had pre-existing hematological abnormalities and four developed neutropenic fever. Neurotoxicity was mild and grade 3 paraesthesia occurred in one patient. The overall objective response rate in 37 evaluable patients was 30% and responses were observed in all subgroups of patients. We conclude that weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m) is active, safe and well tolerated in heavily pre-treated frail/elderly patients with poor prognostic features, including low performance scores and multiple metastatic sites, who would not be eligible for treatment with the standard 3-weekly regimen.

A phase II study of escalated-dose docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is highly active in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The principal dose-limiting toxicities of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. In a previous phase I dose-escalation study with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, the recommended dose was determined to be docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) 3-weekly. The objectives of this phase II study were to determine the response rate and toxicity of this dose and schedule, given as first-line in patients with advanced breast cancer. Mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible women had metastatic breast cancer and were aged 18-75 years with ECOG performance status < or =2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed, and adjuvant chemotherapy must have been completed at least 6 months previously. Treatment was docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) over 60-90 min every 21 days with G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery, for up to six cycles. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. Bloods samples to determine PBSC levels [CD34+, granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFC) and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E)] were taken on days 6, 8, 9 and 11 following docetaxel.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women with median age 50 years (range 35-66) were included. Seventeen (68%) had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. In total, 112 cycles were delivered (median four per patient), with dose reductions required in 12.5% of cycles. G-CSF was given for a median of 6 days. The median neutrophil nadir was 0.5 x 10(9)/l and occurred a median 5 days after treatment. The median duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 2 days (range 1-7). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients, but there was only one episode of febrile neutropenia. Five patients were taken off study due to toxicities that included oedema, neurosensory toxicity and asthenia. Confirmed partial response was seen in nine patients (37.5%; 95% confidence interval 19% to 59%). CD34+ cells, GM-CFC and BFU-E levels peaked at day 8 following docetaxel administration. The median CD34+ cell peak was 6.5 x 10(4)/ml, with only 20% of patients <2 x 10(4)/ml, a level below which leukapheresis is not usually attempted.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) was delivered with G-CSF support with a very low rate of febrile neutropenia. Non-haematological toxicity was significant, causing five patients to go off study. Effective mobilisation of PBSCs was seen. The response rate of 37.5% was less than that obtained in first-line studies using standard-dose docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), suggesting that there is no additional benefit in dose escalation of this cytotoxic agent in breast cancer patients using this schedule.

Population pharmacokinetics of weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer

AIMS

Previous pharmacokinetic studies of the 3-weekly regimen (100 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks) of docetaxel have shown that docetaxel clearance is affected by liver function, body surface area, age, serum alpha1-acid glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity. However, the pharmacokinetics of a weekly docetaxel (40 mg m(-2) week(-1)) schedule are not well characterized. The aims of this study were (a) to investigate the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel (40 mg m(-2) week(-1)) using sparse concentration-time data collected from patients with advanced cancer and (b) to utilize a population pharmacokinetic approach to identify patient covariates that significantly influence the clearance of docetaxel when administered according to this regimen.

METHODS

A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to describe the docetaxel concentration-time data from 54 patients with advanced cancer. The mean population and individual posterior Bayesian estimates of docetaxel clearance were estimated using P-PHARM. The relationships between docetaxel clearance and 21 covariates were investigated. This included estimates of CYP3A4 function in each patient using the erythromycin breath test (1/tmax). Significant covariates were included into the final population pharmacokinetic model. Pharmacokinetic models were validated using a data splitting approach with a dataset consisting of 16 patients.

RESULTS

Significant relationships were found between docetaxel clearance and 1/tmax (erythromycin breath test parameter) and several of the liver function enzymes and CL was best described by the equation; CL = 21.51 + 217 (1/tmax) - 0.13 (ALT). This final population pharmacokinetic model provided both precise and unbiased predictions of docetaxel concentrations in a validation group of patients and an estimate of the population mean (95% confidence interval) clearance of docetaxel was 30.13 l h(-1) (12.54, 46.04 l h(-1)) with an intersubject variability 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

A population pharmacokinetic model has been developed and validated for weekly docetaxel (40 mg m(-2)) in patients with advanced cancer. These results indicate that CYP3A4 activity and hepatic function have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel when administered weekly.

Vinorelbine and Cisplatin for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Salvage Regimen in Patients Progressing After Docetaxel and Anthracycline Treatment

PURPOSE

To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of a combination of vinorelbine (VNR) and cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and docetaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with assessable metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and docetaxel (adjuvant n = 1, palliative n = 20, both n = 15) were studied. Cisplatin was given at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by 25 mg/m2 VNR on days 1 + 8 in a 5-minute i.v. infusion. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression, excess toxicity, or patient refusal. Patients were classified according to their response to anthracyclines according to criteria published previously: 1) Anthracycline and/or docetaxel resistant were patients who progressed during treatment with anthracyclines and docetaxel or within 4 months after cessation of treatment (metastatic). In addition, adjuvant patients who progressed within 6 months after completion of chemotherapy belong to this group. 2) Anthracycline and/or docetaxel relapsed were either metastatic patients who responded initially and then progressed after 4 months of completing an anthracycline- and docetaxel-based chemotherapy or patients who progressed after 6 months from completion of anthracycline/docetaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Two patients (5.6%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 15 patients (41.6%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate (OR) of 47.2% (95% confidence interval, 31-63). Of 18 patients relapsed to anthracycline/docetaxel, 2 had a CR (11%) and 8 a PR (44.4%), giving an objective response of 55.5%. Stable disease (SD) was observed in one patient (5.5%); seven patients had progressive disease (PD) (39%). Among the 18 resistant patients, 7 PRs (39%) were observed (p = 0.5), one patient (5.5%) had stable disease, 10 patients (55.5%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 16 weeks and median overall survival 36 weeks. Relapsed patients had a longer TTP than resistant patients (24 vs. 8 weeks, p = 0.05) but similar survival (48 vs. 24 weeks, p = 0.173). All patients were assessed for toxicity. The main toxicity was neutropenia grade 3 and 4 in 47% of patients. Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization was absent. There were no treatment-related deaths. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 and 4 occurred in four patients (11%). Phlebitis, orthostatic hypotension, and asthenia, all reversible, were observed in 3% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This cisplatin/VNR regimen is well tolerated and active in patients who failed anthracyclines and docetaxel treatment. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are high and indicate that cisplatin/VNR may have a place as salvage treatment in this group of patients. If these results can be verified in multi-institutional trials, this combination of drugs would merit investigation as part of a first-line therapy in breast cancer.