Vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced stage (IB2-IIA2-IIB) cervical carcinoma: Experience of a tertiary center and comprehensive review of the literature

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma.

Materials and Methods:

Data of 43 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma who had NACT were reviewed. NACT protocols implemented included cisplatin/5-fluorauracil, cisplatin/UFT, and carboplatin/paclitaxel. After NACT, the patients were re-examined, and patients who had a tumor size ≤40 mm underwent Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy, while other patients received radiotherapy. Following NACT, clinical responses were assessed according to the criteria of the World Health Organization.

Results:

The mean age of the patients was 49.4 years, and the median follow-up duration was 48 (range, 5-228) months. The median tumor sizes were 50 and 30 mm before and after NACT, respectively. Complete clinical response was observed in 4 (9.3%) patients, partial clinical response in 8 (18.6%), and pathologic complete response in 3 (6.9%). Stable disease was noted in 30 (69.9%) patients and progression in 1 (2.3%) patient. After NACT, 31 patients have undergone radical surgical procedures. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 72%, and the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 91%. Age, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage, histopathologic type, NACT protocol, rate of decrease in tumor size after NACT, clinical response, number of courses, tumor size before NACT, tumor size after NACT, and lymph node metastasis were not associated with disease-free survival.

Conclusion:

Following NACT, a significant reduction in tumor dimension was observed, and the probability of radical surgery is increased. However, clinical response was not predictive of survival.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Radiation and Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Review of the Recent Literature

Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer; nevertheless it fails to control disease progression within the irradiation fields in more than 40% of cases, particularly in patients with bulky tumor. Distant metastases are not infrequent in more advanced cases. Chemotherapy has been integrated with radiotherapy to improve local control and treat distant subclinical metastases. Schedules of combined treatment more frequently represented by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation (NACT) and by concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CT-RT). A review of the recent literature is presented. The role of NACT is controversial: high response rates are reported but doubtful advantages in terms of survival or local control have been shown. In randomized trials, hydroxyurea concomitant to radiation improves local control and survival, particularly in stage IIIB and IVA. Several randomized trials of concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU, cisplatin and mitomycin C are underway, but few have been published: no significative differences are reported in term of local control or survival. Acute toxicity is higher than in radiation alone, but usually manageable. For the analysis of late morbidity a longer follow-up is required. Large randomized trials of adequate radiotherapy versus concomitant chemoradiation are necessary to refine our understanding of the benefits of this integrated treatment.

Expression of ERCC1 and TUBB3 in Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Cancer and its Correlation with Different Therapeutic Regimens

Background

Several studies in solid tumors have shown that expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) can predict response to chemoradiotherapy and might be prognostic factors. We assessed the role of ERCC1 and TUBB3 expressions as predictive and prognostic factors in locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma (LACSCC) patients treated with different neoadjuvant regimens.

Methods

ERCC1 and TUBB3 were detected in 88 patients with LACSCC by immunohistochemical analysis. Sixty-two patients were included in 3 different prospective trials and grouped as follows: vinorelbine or docetaxel (group A, n = 44) and ifosfamide-vinorelbine-cisplatin (group B, n = 18). Both groups were compared with standard cisplatin chemoradiotherapy (group C, n = 26). Clinical data at baseline, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were also collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to analyze the risk factors.

Results

Thirty-five patients (39.8%) and 18 (20.5%) had high ERCC1 and TUBB3 expression, respectively. Both proteins were overexpressed in tumors with unfavorable characteristics. High ERCC1 was associated with advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.034) and progressive disease (49% vs. 28%). Poor DFS (p = 0.021) and OS (p = 0.005) were observed in group C patients with high ERCC1 expression. Multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 expression, FIGO stage and pretreatment hemoglobin level were significant prognostic factors (p = 0.002, p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions

ERCC1 expression could be a predictive and prognostic factor in LACSCC patients who receive cisplatin monotherapy. Conversely, TUBB3 had no impact on survival in patients treated with antimicrotubule agents.

Role of difucosylated Lewis Y antigen in outcome of locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin regimen

BACKGROUND

Several mechanisms are involved in the development of resistance to therapy in locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma (LACSCC). Studies have shown that CD44 and Lewis Y antigen (LeY) form a complex that is associated with chemoresistance, tumor invasion and metastasis. We assessed the role of CD44 and LeY in the outcome of LACSCC patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

126 LACSCC patients at FIGO stages IIB-IVA were selected from the GOCS database: 74 patients included in 3 different prospective phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting (vinorelbine, docetaxel, ifosfamide-vinorelbine-cisplatin) and 52 patients treated with standard radiochemotherapy based on cisplatin (RCBC). Clinical data at baseline, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were employed.

RESULTS

Median age was 45.6 years (range: 24.9-80.5). Sixty-three and 47 tumors were CD44+ and LeY+, respectively. Tumors with expansive growth showed higher grade (p = 0.0024), mitotic index (p = 0.0505), tumor necrosis (p = 0.0191), LeY+ (p = 0.0034) and CD44+/LeY+ coexpression (p = 0.0334). CD44+ cells were present in 91.3% of patients with local recurrence (p = 0.0317). Advanced stage was associated with LeY+ tumors. Patients treated with RCBC had worse DFS and OS when their tumors expressed LeY (p = 0.0083 and p = 0.0137, respectively). Pre-treatment hemoglobin level, FIGO stage and tumor response remained the most significant prognostic factors in Cox regression.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of LACSCC patients, the coexpression of CD44 and LeY was not associated with worse outcome. However, in the subgroup of patients receiving RCBC, LeY expression was correlated with shorter DFS and OS.

Does Thermosensitive Liposomal Vinorelbine Improve End-Point Survival after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors in a Mouse Model?

Purpose To investigate the role of thermosensitive liposome-encapsulated vinorelbine (Thermo-Vin) in combined radiofrequency (RF) ablation of liver tumors. Materials and Methods Approval from the institutional animal care and use committee was obtained before this study. First, the anticancer efficacy of Thermo-Vin was assessed in vitro (H22 cells) for 72 hours at 37°C or 42°C. Next, 203 H22 liver adenocarcinomas were implanted in 191 mice for in vivo study. Tumors were randomized into seven groups: (a) no treatment, (b) treatment with RF ablation alone, (c) treatment with RF ablation followed by free vinorelbine (Free-Vin) at 30 minutes, (d) treatment with RF ablation followed by empty liposomes (Empty-Lip+RF), (e) treatment with RF ablation followed by Thermo-Vin (5 mg/kg), (f) treatment with RF ablation followed by Thermo-Vin (10 mg/kg), and (g) treatment with RF ablation followed by Thermo-Vin (20 mg/kg). Tumor destruction areas and pathologic changes were compared for different groups at 24 and 72 hours after treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare end-point survival (tumor < 30 mm in diameter). Additionally, the effect of initial tumor size on long-term outcome was analyzed. Results In vitro, both Free-Vin and Thermo-Vin dramatically inhibited H22 cell viability at 24 hours. Likewise, in vivo, 10 mg/kg Thermo-Vin+RF ablation increased tumor destruction compared with RF ablation (P = .001). Intratumoral vinorelbine accumulation with Thermo-Vin+RF increased 15-fold compared with Free-Vin alone. Thermo-Vin substantially increased apoptosis at the coagulation margin and suppressed cellular proliferation in the residual tumor (P < .001). The Thermo-Vin+RF study arm also had better survival than the arm treated with RF ablation alone (mean, 37.6 days ± 20.1 vs 23.4 days ± 5.0; P = .001), the arm treated with Free-Vin+RF (23.3 days ± 1.2, P = .002), or the arm treated with Empty-Lip+RF (20.8 days ± 0.4, P < .001) in animals with medium-sized (10-12-mm) tumors. No significant difference in end-point survival was noted in the treatment arms with large or small tumors. Conclusion Thermo-Vin can effectively increase tumor destruction and improve animal survival. End-point survival is most affected in animals with medium-sized tumors, suggesting that combination therapy should be tailored to tumor size and the expected volume of ablation of the device used. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

In vitro chemoresponse analysis of cervical cancer patient specimens

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to report the results of in vitro chemoresponse analysis of primary, metastatic, and recurrent human cervical cancers.

METHODS

There were 557 tumor specimens submitted for testing from August 2006 to June 2010. Single agents tested were cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, epirubicin, fluorouracil, 4-hydroxy ifosfamide (active metabolite of ifosfamide), SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan), topotecan, and vinorelbine. Doublets tested were carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/topotecan. Tumor response was determined from dose-response curves. Results were scored as responsive, intermediate, or nonresponsive. Chemoresponse was reported as the combined responsive and intermediate results.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-three (63.4%) of 557 submitted specimens were successfully assayed. Confirmation of histology and tumor status (primary, metastatic, or recurrent) was available for 273 specimens. The chemoresponse of the most active agents in primary cancers (n = 151) was 75% for SN-38, 71% for 4-hydroxy ifosfamide, 62% for topotecan, and 73% for carboplatin/paclitaxel. The chemoresponse of metastatic cancers (n = 66) was 54% for SN-38, 51% for 4-hydroxy ifosfamide, 44% for epirubicin, and 53% for carboplatin/paclitaxel. The chemoresponse for recurrent cancers (n = 56) was 44% for epirubicin, 41% for 4-hydroxy ifosfamide, 39% for vinorelbine, 39% for paclitaxel, 36% for topotecan, 46% for carboplatin/paclitaxel, and 35% for cisplatin/topotecan. The overall chemoresponse was greater in primary cancers (58%) than in recurrent cancers (35%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro chemoresponse analysis of cervical cancer biospecimens is feasible. Chemoresponse results are variable depending on tumor status. Clinical studies of assay-directed therapy should be developed.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced cervix cancer: a systematic review

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervix cancer has comparable benefits to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), but with fewer side effects. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the management of locally advanced cervix cancer from stage IB2 (tumor >4.0 cm) to IIIB (tumor extending to the pelvic wall and/or hydronephrosis). Our primary objective was to assess benefits in terms of survival. The data source included the USA national library of medicine, Medline search, and the National Cancer Institute PDQ Clinical Protocols. Inclusion criteria for consideration in the current systematic review included studies published between January 1997 and December 2012. In terms of histology, they had to be focused on squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and/or adenocarcinoma. Patients should be either chemotherapy naïve or cervix cancer chemotherapy naïve, and have a performance status ≤2. The search in the above-mentioned scientific websites led to identify 49 publications, 19 of which were excluded, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. Therefore only 30 studies were deemed eligible. Data was collected from 1760 patients enrolled in the current systematic review study. The mean age was 45.2 years. The mean tumor size was 4.7 cm. The most commonly used chemotherapies were cisplatin doublets. Paclitaxel was the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent in the doublets. The mean chemotherapy cycles were 2.7. After chemotherapy, patients underwent surgery after a mean time of 2.5 weeks. The standard operation was radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Chemotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 84%. The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 61.9% and 72.8% respectively. The treatment protocol was associated with a mild early toxicity profile. Leucopenia and neutropenia were the most common side effects. Late toxicity was also generally mild and mainly associated with bladder dysfunction and vaginal dehiscence. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved comparable survival results to CCRT, and was associated with less toxicity.

Locally advanced cervical cancer: what is the standard of care?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Carcinoma of the cervix remains a significant health problem for women worldwide. Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is a common presentation that has been extensively studied in the last three decades. This article reviews the standard of care and discusses current topics of clinical research.

RECENT FINDINGS

A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of cervical cancer has led to marked improvement in outcome. Main advances are with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and preventive vaccination. Concurrent chemoradiation with a platinum-based agent is the recommended treatment for LACC. Palliation with platinum agent remains the standard of care for inoperable patients who have metastatic or recurrent disease.

SUMMARY

This is a review of published and ongoing studies testing multidisciplinary and medical management of LACC, with a focus on newer chemotherapeutic approaches. Optimal multidisciplinary treatment planning improves the outcome of each patient diagnosed with cervical cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of liposomal vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumor

PURPOSE

This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of an untargeted liposomal formulation of vinorelbine (NanoVNB®) and to characterize its plasma pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumors which were refractory to conventional treatment or without an effective treatment.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The study incorporated an accelerated titration design. Twenty-two patients with various solid tumors were enrolled. NanoVNB(®) was administered intravenously at doses of 2.2-23 mg/m(2) once every 14 days. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were evaluated in the first cycle. The safety profiles and anti-tumor effects of NanoVNB® were also determined.

RESULTS

Skin rash was the DLT and the most common non-hematological toxicity. The MTD was 18.5 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were infrequent. Compared with intravenous free vinorelbine, NanoVNB® showed a high C(max) and low plasma clearance. Of the 11 patients completing at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, 5 had stable disease. No responders were noted.

CONCLUSION

NanoVNB® was well tolerated and exhibited more favorable pharmacokinetic profiles than free vinorelbine. Based on dose-limiting skin toxicity, further evaluation of NanoVNB® starting from 18.5 mg/m(2) as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents for vinorelbine-active malignancies is warranted.

Topotecan in cervical cancer

Recurrent and advanced cervical cancers are associated with high mortality and a lack of effective treatment options, especially for women who are poor candidates for surgery or radiation therapy. The broad clinical effectiveness and manageable toxicity of topotecan in other human malignancies as well as promising recent study results suggest that it is highly effective in treating cervical tumors. We therefore conducted a systematic review on the studies using topotecan in cervical cancer. Seven phase I-III clinical trials using topotecan, both as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin or paclitaxel, in patients with recurrent or advanced carcinoma of the cervix were reviewed. Data from two studies in which topotecan was used in combination with radiotherapy for induction therapy were also evaluated. Although single-agent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for high-risk or locally advanced cervical cancer, topotecan, when used concurrently with cisplatin and/or radiation therapy, produces high objective response rates and prolonged survival. Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Protocol 179 for the first time showed significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival in a combination therapy for advanced cervical cancer compared to cisplatin alone. Recent data suggest that topotecan, when used concurrently with cisplatin, may be the new standard of care for the management of recurrent or advanced cervical cancer. Ongoing phase III studies (GOG-204, AGO-Zervix-1) will compare this combination with other cisplatin-containing and cisplatin-free combinations. Moreover, further evaluation of topotecan appears to be warranted in conjunction with radiotherapy and in the neoadjuvant setting as well as in combination with novel biologic agents.

Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Background

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer patients; however, neoadjuvant modalities are currently being tested. Neoadjuvant studies in several tumor types have underscored the prognostic significance of pathological response for survival; however there is a paucity of studies in cervical cancer investigating this issue.

Methods

Four cohorts of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IB2-IIIB); included prospectively in phase II protocols of either neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 1) cisplatin-gemcitabine, 2) oxaliplatin-gemcitabine, 3) carboplatin-paclitaxel or 4) chemoradiation with cisplatin or cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical hysterectomy were analyzed for pathological response and survival.

Results

One-hundred and fifty three (86%) of the 178 patients treated within these trials, underwent radical hysterectomy and were analyzed. Overall, the mean age was 44.7 and almost two-thirds were FIGO stage IIB. Pathological response rates were as follows: Complete (pCR) in 60 cases (39.2%), Near-complete (p-Near-CR) in 24 (15.6 %) and partial (pPR) in 69 cases (45.1%). A higher proportion rate of pCR was observed in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (with cisplatin [19/40, 47.5%]; or with cisplatin-gemcitabine [24/41, 58.5%] compared with patients receiving only chemotherapy, 6/23 (26%), 3/8 (37.5%) and 8/41 (19.5%) for cisplatin-gemcitabine, oxaliplatin-gemcitabine and carboplatin-paclitaxel respectively [p = 0.0001]). A total of 29 relapses (18.9%) were documented. The pathological response was the only factor influencing on relapse, since only 4/60 (6.6%) patients with pCR relapsed, compared with 25/93 (26.8%) patients with viable tumor, either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.001). Overall survival was 98.3% in patients with pCR versus 83% for patients with either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Complete pathological response but no Near-complete and partial responses is associated with longer survival in cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intravenous cisplatin and vinorelbine as combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1997 and January 2001, 73 patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were entered onto this study. Eligible patients had received no prior therapeutic chemotherapy, except when administered concurrent with primary radiation therapy. The initial doses administered were cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) weekly. Subsequent doses were unchanged, reduced, escalated, or omitted according to observed toxicity and protocol guidelines. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity using standard Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria.

RESULTS

Of 73 patients, 67 were eligible and assessable. The overall response rate was 30% (five complete and 15 partial responses). The overall median response duration was 5.5+ months. The major toxicity was neutropenia, with 16% grade 3 and 67% grade 4 reported. Gastrointestinal and neurotoxicity were infrequent and mild.

CONCLUSION

The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine has moderate activity in advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Additional study of this regimen in a phase III setting is justified in this patient population.

Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, cisplatin, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine in combination with weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Eligible patients included those with bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with other advanced gynecologic malignancies were also eligible. All patients received cisplatin 40 mg/m(-2)/week (maximum dose, 70 mg) during pelvic RT. Vinorelbine was administered on the same day as cisplatin at a starting dose of 10 mg/m(-2)/week and escalated in 5 mg/m(-2)/week increments. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, or any toxicity which required > or =1 week delay in RT or an omission of >1 dose of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between April 2001 and September 2002, 12 women with pelvic malignancies (11 cervical, 1 recurrent ovarian) were enrolled. Cohorts of 3, 6, and 3 patients were treated at 10, 15, and 20 mg/m(-2)/week dose levels of vinorelbine. At the 20 mg/m2 level, DLT was observed. Two of three patients missed >1 cycle of chemotherapy secondary to predominantly hematologic toxicity. One patient at the 20 mg level developed a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min and missed 1 dose of cisplatin. Another developed transient grade 3 diarrhea. No grade 4 toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and pelvic RT in patients with cervical cancer is 15 mg/m(-2)/week.

New drugs in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is the second major cause of death in women. In locally-advanced or refractory cervical cancer, cisplatin-based chemotherapy still represents the best chance of cure, although chemotherapy in these patients usually results in excessive toxicity and short duration of response. Newly developed chemotherapy agents, widely used in other cancers, have been employed as single agents and in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Several phase II-studies have been performed in order to assess the effectiveness of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, vinorelbine and camptothecines in cervical cancer. When used as single agents, these compounds have an overall response rate (ORR) of 8-25%. Cisplatin-combined regimens may offer improved efficacy, with a ORR between 41 and 60%. Toxicity remains the more limiting factor in the treatment of irradiated or pretreated patients. New targets must be identified for innovative therapeutic approaches that could improve the response rate and survival of cervical cancer patients.

Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cervical Carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel as single-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced cervical carcinoma. Between April 1998 and August 2000, 38 untreated patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB to IVA were entered onto this study. The median age was 44 years (range: 25-66 years). Stages: IIB 22 patients, IIIB 15 patients, and IVA 1 pt. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 IV infusion during 1 hour. Standard premedication with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine was used. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for three courses, followed by radical surgery when it was judged appropriate, or definitive radiotherapy. Both staging and response assessment were performed by a multidisciplinary team. 106 cycles of therapy were administered; all patients were evaluable for TX, whereas 35 were evaluable for response (3 patients refused further treatment after the first cycle of therapy). Complete response (CR): 1 patient (3%); partial response: 11 patients (31%), for an overall objective response rate of 34% (95% CI: 15-53%); no change (NC): 16 patients (46%); and progressive disease: 7 patients (20%). Six patients (17%) underwent surgery and a pathologic CR was confirmed in 1 of them. The median time to treatment failure and the median survival have not been reached yet. The limiting toxicity was leukopenia in 25 patients (69%) (G1-G2: 14 patients, G3: 10 patients, and G4: 1 patient). Neutropenia: 28 patients (78%) (G1-G2: 10 patients, G3: 8 and G4: 10). Myalgias: 17 patients (47%) (G1-G2: 15 patients and G3: 2 patients). Emesis: 21 patients (55%) (G1-G2: 19 patients and G3: 2 patients). Alopecia G3: 13 patients (36%); rash cutaneous 26 patients (68%) (G1-G2: 22 patients and G3: 4 patients). There were no hypersensitivity reactions or fluid-retention syndrome. The received dose intensity was 91% of that projected. Docetaxel is an active drug against advanced cervical carcinoma with moderate toxicity. Further evaluation in association with other agents is clearly justified.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a phase II study

Fifty eight consecutive untreated patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with cisplatin (CDDP) 80 mg/sqm (day 1) + vinorelbine (VRL) 25 mg/sqm (day 1 and 8). Three cycles of chemotherapy were planned every 21 days. Within 28 days from the completion of chemotherapy patients in complete or partial response were submitted to radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. On 155 cycles, hematologic toxicity was mild (G3-4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 16% and 5%, respectively). Forty-seven patients (81%) were submitted to radical surgery; eight (14%) patients were deemed ineligible for surgery because of poor response to treatment, two (3%) for anesthesia contraindications and one (2%) refused surgery. At pathologic examination 12 patients (25%) had a complete response, one (2%) in-situ carcinoma, six (13%) residual microinvasive disease, and 28 (60%) a partial response. None had extracervical disease. Eight patients (14%) had microscopic lymph node metastases. The number of cycles administered was significantly associated with a good pathologic response. Association of CDDP and VRL as NACT in LACC appears safe and effective. Low cost and modest toxicity would support the initiation of a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare this association with cisplatin alone.

Role of systemic chemotherapy in metastatic cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is a chemoresponsive tumor. Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin and radiotherapy has resulted in improved survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and is now standard of care. There are many active drugs in metastatic cervical cancer with cisplatin being the most active single agent. Although response rates are significantly higher with cisplatin combinations, to date, there is no evidence to suggest this is associated with an improved survival. However, this is still an area that is attracting much research interest. The role of chemotherapy in metastatic cervical cancer will be reviewed together with some of the new areas of research.

Update on the treatment of cervical and uterine carcinoma: focus on topotecan

Carcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus are significant causes of morbidity and mortality among women in the U.S. and are expected to contribute 10,700 deaths in 2002. Despite the widespread use of cytologic screening and improvements in early diagnosis, mortality rates have changed little over the past 25 years, and the management of cervical and uterine cancers remains a significant unmet medical need. Currently available modalities, including radiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy, provide suboptimal control of disease, and there are no effective treatments for recurrent disease. The antitumor activity and tolerability of a number of novel agents, including topoisomerase I inhibitors, vinca alkaloids, taxanes, and gemcitabine, have been of considerable interest in treatment of these cancers. This review discusses current trends in the treatment of cervical and endometrial carcinomas, focusing on the potential role of topotecan in the treatment of non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies.

Developments in cytotoxic chemotherapy: advances in treatment utilising vinorelbine

Vinorelbine is a third generation vinca alkaloid which has been in clinical development for 15 years. Recent exploration of its pre-clinical activity has revealed unexpected evidence of potential synergy with taxane compounds and early clinical results support the suggestion of enhanced efficacy particularly in breast cancer. The initial studies establishing the clinical activity of vinorelbine in breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer have been extended to encompass a thorough evaluation of its contribution to combination chemotherapy for these disorders. In the treatment of breast cancer useful activity has been established for vinorelbine in combination with anthracyclines, anthracenediones, antimetabolites and the taxanes; additive toxicity is not a limiting factor. The activity of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is significantly extended by incorporation into schedules utilising cisplatin and other agents. Vinorelbine has also demonstrated useful activity in the treatment of a wide range of other malignancies including prostatic carcinoma, multiple myeloma, cancer of the ovary, cervix and head and neck and malignant lymphomas.

Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic radiation therapy (RT) in patients with advanced cervical cancer and other pelvic malignancies.

METHODS

Eligible patients included those with large or locally advanced cervical cancer. In addition, patients with other advanced gynecologic malignancies were eligible. In part I, vinorelbine was administered as a single agent during pelvic RT at a starting dose of 10 mg/m(2)/week with subsequent cohorts being escalated in 5 mg/m(2)/week increments. In part II, paclitaxel was added to vinorelbine (20 mg/m(2)/week) and pelvic RT at a starting dose of 20 mg/m(2)/week.

RESULTS

Thirty-three women with pelvic malignancies (22 cervix, 6 vagina, 3 endometrium, 2 vulva) were enrolled. Twenty-seven received vinorelbine and 6 received both paclitaxel and vinorelbine in combination with pelvic RT. Escalating vinorelbine doses to 25 mg/m(2)/week were well tolerated, with the primary toxicity being hematologic. RT was delayed in only 1 patient due to acute hematologic toxicity. In contrast, the combination of paclitaxel, vinorelbine, and pelvic RT was not well tolerated. Five of 6 patients (83%) experienced grade > or = 2 leukopenia, with 2 patients missing > 1 cycle of chemotherapy. Moreover, RT was delayed for 1 week in 2 of 6 patients (33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant pelvic RT and vinorelbine with doses to 25 mg/m(2)/week is well tolerated. The addition of paclitaxel to this combination is associated with significant hematologic toxicity and is thus not a feasible approach.

Randomized phase III trial of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin-C, and cisplatin (BEMP) versus cisplatin (P) in disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group study

PURPOSE

Three previous mitomycin-cisplatin-based chemotherapy trials conducted within the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group (GCCG) in patients with disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCCUC) suggested that with such regimens a higher overall response rate and a higher complete response rate could be obtained compared to what might have been expected from cisplatin alone. In that respect the combination of bleomycin, vindesine (Eldesine), mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) was the most promising. In the present study BEMP has been compared with the best single agent, cisplatin (P) in the expectation that improved response rates might translate into a better survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with SCCUC and disseminated measurable disease outside previously irradiated areas, aged < or = 75 years, with a WHO performance status < or = 2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic and pulmonary function, who gave consent according to regulations followed in individual institutions. Patients were randomized to BEMP: E 3 mg/m2 day 1, P 50 mg/m2 day 1, B 15 mg (24-hour infusion) day 2-4 and M 8 mg/m2 (at alternate cycles), or P 50 mg/m2. The first four cycles were given every 3 weeks (induction phase). Subsequent cycles were given every four weeks (maintenance phase), during which B was deleted from BEMP (MEP). Patients failing on P could be treated with BEM. Of the 287 patients entered, 235 were eligible and 201 evaluable for response.

RESULTS

BEMP induced a significantly higher response rate than P (42% vs. 25%, P = 0.006). There was no difference in complete response rate (11% vs. 7%). BEMP was significantly more toxic than P (+/- BEM), both with respect to hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, survival curves were not significantly different. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 10.1 months with BEMP and 4.5 and 9.3 months with P (+/- BEM), respectively. In a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival, a lower age (P = 0.003), a lower performance status (P = 0.0001) and a short (<1 year) interval since diagnosis (P = 0.0152) were all associated with an increased risk of dying. For progression-free survival, lower age, prior radiotherapy, locoregional involvement and no prior surgery were associated with a high risk. Treatment with BEMP or P had no significant impact on survival, but for progression-free survival there was a trend in favor of BEMP (P = 0.0893). Adjusting for prognostic factors did not change the effect of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with BEMP produces more toxicity and more responses compared with cisplatin alone in patients with disseminated SCCUC, but this does not translate into a better survival. Therefore, in the palliative setting single-agent cisplatin should remain the standard therapy for these patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide, cisplatin, and vinorelbine in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

A phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of ifosfamide (IFX), cisplatin (CDDP), and vinorelbine (VNB) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for untreated advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC). Between October 1995 and February 1998, 40 patients were entered in this study. Their median age was 43 years (range: 23-74 years). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were: IIB, 23; IIIB, 13; and IVA, 4. Therapy consisted of: IFX 2,000 mg/m2 1-hour (H) IV infusion days 1 to 3; 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid sodium salt (mesna) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus H 0 and 4, and 800 mg/m2 by mouth H 8, days 1 to 3; VNB 25 mg/m2 20-minute IV infusion days 1 and 8; and CDDP 75 mg/m2 IV day 3. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a total of three courses. Both staging and response (R) assessment were performed by a multidisciplinary team. An objective response (OR) was observed in 24 of 40 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval, 45-75%). Four patients achieved complete response (CR) (10%); 20 partial response (50%); 12 patients stable disease (30%); and 4 progressive disease (10%). Eight of 24 patients (33%) with OR underwent radical surgery, and histologic CRs were recorded in 2 of them. The remaining patients received definitive radiotherapy after NAC. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 32 patients (80%) and was grade III or IV in 14 patients (36%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (22%), whereas myalgias occurred in 10 (25%). Constipation was observed in 9 patients (23%); emesis occurred in 35 patients (88%). There were no therapy-related deaths. These results indicate that IFX/CDDP/VNB is an active combination for ACC with moderate toxicity. Implementation of this regimen in a multimodal therapy protocol deserves further study.

Phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or recurrent cervical carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group Study

The objective of this phase II study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine administered as a single agent in the treatment of chemonaïve cervical cancer patients. 46 patients (41 eligible) with cervical cancer (epidermoid or adenocarcinoma) and measurable metastatic and/or recurrent disease localised outside irradiated areas were treated with weekly intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 infused over 20 min. No prior chemotherapy was allowed. Median age was 53 years (range: 33-73), and performance status 1 (0-2). 31 patients (76%) had prior radiation therapy. There were 7 partial responders (17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7-32) and 8 stable diseases (20%). Median duration of response was 5 months (4-11). Granulocytopenia was the major toxicity, with 47% of patients exhibiting grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Dose reduction and/or treatment delay was necessary in 28 patients (78%). Peripheral neuropathy reported in 10 patients was mild (grade 1 in 9 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient). In conclusion, single agent vinorelbine has moderate activity in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, but its reduced neurotoxicity warrants further study in combination with cisplatin.

Phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix that has not been previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with cervical cancer were enrolled onto this study (27 stage IB-III, 23 stage IVB-recurrent). A two-stage optimal Simon design was applied. Thirteen responders of 29 treated patients were required to proceed beyond the first stage, and 28 responders were needed overall.

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicity was mild, with neutropenia being the most frequent side effect. Nonhematologic toxicity was frequent but never severe; one patient had grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Objective responses were recorded for 32 patients (64%): 11 patients (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 patients (42%) achieved a partial response (PR). The response rate was 81.5% in patients with IB-III stage (25.9% CR rate) and 43.5% in patients with IVB-recurrent disease (17.4% CR rate). Responses were seen both in stage IVB patients (one CR and two PRs, for an overall rate of 37.5%) and in patients with recurrent disease (three CRs + four PRs, for an overall rate of 46.7%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.

A phase I study of a daily x3 schedule of intravenous vinorelbine for refractory epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicity and activity of intravenous vinorelbine given daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 1994 and October 1995, 23 women with refractory epithelial ovarian cancer were entered onto this phase I study. All patients had measurable disease and platinum-resistant tumor, and prior therapy was limited to a maximum of two prior regimens. Nineteen (83%) were assessable for toxicity and 20 (87%) were assessable for response. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously daily for 3 consecutive days; this was repeated every 21 days. The starting dose was 20 mg/m2 daily x3, with dose escalation by 5 mg/m2 daily x3. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 granulocytopenia for >3 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, or grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which <50% of patients developed a DLT. Once the MTD of vinorelbine without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) support was defined, dosing was begun at the MTD level and administration of 5 microg/kg filgrastim was initiated on day 4 and continued until WBC counts reached >10,000/microL. Clinical response, progression-free survival, and survival were also determined.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients evaluable for toxicity received a total of 135 cycles of vinorelbine. The major DLT was neutropenia. The MTD of vinorelbine without filgrastim support was established as 20 mg/m2 daily x3. The MTD of vinorelbine with filgrastim support was established as 25 mg/m2 daily x3. Of 20 patients evaluable for response, 2 patients (10%) had a complete response and 4 (20%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 30%.

CONCLUSION

These results warrant further study of vinorelbine in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. However, further study of the daily x3 schedule may not be warranted because of failure to achieve higher weekly dose intensity and because of nonhematologic toxicity in the form of intense bone pain.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma in pregnancy: a report of two cases and review of issues specific to the management of cervical carcinoma in pregnancy including planned delay of therapy

BACKGROUND

Women diagnosed with invasive cervical carcinoma during pregnancy are faced with difficult decisions regarding therapy and the fate of their unborn child. A modest treatment delay for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I cervical lesions is considered acceptable in patients who wish to continue their pregnancy.

METHODS

Two patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma diagnosed early in the second trimester strongly desired continuation of their pregnancies. They were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy until the third trimester, and then underwent delivery and definitive surgical treatment. The patients were evaluated during pregnancy for evidence of a clinical response to chemotherapy. Intraoperative findings and pathologic analysis of the surgical material provided further objective data regarding disease status.

RESULTS

Both patients experienced a dramatic reduction in tumor volume, rendering radical hysterectomy feasible at the time of cesarean section. In addition, both patients tolerated chemotherapy well and there were no adverse fetal effects. Favorable neonatal outcomes were achieved. One patient experienced recurrence within 5 months of surgery, whereas the other patient remained without evidence of disease for 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, these reports constitute the first description of the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in pregnancy (MEDLINE 1966-1997). This therapeutic option should be considered in selected women with locally advanced cervical carcinoma who do not want termination of their pregnancy.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide for relapsed or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix

This study reports the results of a phase II trial of carboplatin 100 mg/m2 combined with etoposide 120 mg/m2 each given for 3 consecutive days every 28 days in women with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix. Seventeen eligible patients were treated between August, 1990 and May, 1993. In the 16 evaluable patients, there were 2 complete responses, and no partial responses with an overall objective response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval 1.6%-38%). The main toxicities of this regimen related to myelosuppression and emesis. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide did not achieve either a better response rate or a substantially improved toxicity profile than is seen with single agent cisplatin.