Carboxypeptidase-G2, thymidine, and leucovorin rescue in cancer patients with methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction

Overcoming drug resistance in osteosarcoma with MTX-CuB-NLC: An in vitro and in vivo study

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the predominant bone tumor affecting pediatric and adolescent populations. The standard treatment regimen involves preoperative chemotherapy, surgical intervention, and postoperative chemotherapy. Methotrexate (MTX) serves as the first-line pharmacological agent for OS treatment; however, the emergence of tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents poses a significant challenge. Cucurbitacin B (CuB) exhibits intrinsic anti-OS properties and can synergistically enhance OS suppression by reversing drug resistance and augmenting the therapeutic effects of MTX. Nevertheless, the clinical application of CuB and MTX is hindered by their low aqueous solubility, necessitating the development of an effective drug delivery system to precisely target tumor tissues and maximize therapeutic efficacy. Consequently, this study focuses on the development of a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) co-loaded with MTX and CuB (MTX-CuB-NLC) to address these limitations. MTX-CuB-NLC is characterized as a spherical nanoparticle with a mean particle size of 44.13 ± 1.40 nm, a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.279 ± 0.120, and a zeta potential of -17.10 ± 4.98 mV. The encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and drug loading (DL%) were determined to be 61.03 ± 2.40 % and 0.25 ± 0.02 % for MTX, and 81.02 ± 1.61 % and 0.23 ± 0.02 % for CuB, respectively. The formulation demonstrated substantial storage stability over a 14-day period. In vitro release studies indicated that MTX-CuB-NLC possesses sustained release capabilities. Furthermore, the nanoparticle exhibited significantly enhanced uptake and cytotoxicity against U-2 OS cells compared to the free drug. Notably, MTX-CuB-NLC displayed pronounced cytotoxic effects on methotrexate-resistant U-2 OS cells (U-2 OS/MTX), underscoring its potential to induce apoptosis and circumvent multidrug resistance in these cells. In an OS nude mouse model exhibiting drug resistance, MTX-CuB-NLC demonstrated superior tumor targeting and suppression efficacy. This research has culminated in the development of an effective continuous drug delivery system for osteosarcoma, presenting a promising strategy to combat drug resistance in this malignancy.

After 75 Years of Methotrexate, Can Treatment Results Be Improved With Appropriate Folinic Acid Rescue?

After 75 years of clinical use of folic acid antagonists such as methotrexate, relevant pharmacological data currently important for the effective and safe use of methotrexate were reviewed to see if it is possible to improve outcomes. Specifically, to improve how high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) can be given safely, what doses of MTX (methotrexate) are adequate to achieve therapeutic levels, and what is the appropriate folinic acid (FA) dose for effective rescue. This review is based on 50 years of personal experience with the use of HD-MTX in published literature. Many pharmacologic studies were performed over 50 years ago, but are still relevant and stand up to scrutiny today. What should be considered HD-MTX and how it can be given safely and effectively without late toxicity are presented. The variables responsible for effective folinic acid rescue, especially the doses of MTX and folinic acid and the time to start of rescue, are discussed. Understanding these highlighted aspects of therapy could help to prevent acute toxicity, improve treatment results, and prevent late effects.

A European consensus recommendation on the management of delayed methotrexate elimination: supportive measures, leucovorin rescue and glucarpidase treatment

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is used in the treatment of a range of adult and childhood cancers. Although HDMTX can provide effective anti-tumor activity with an acceptable safety profile for most patients, delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) develops in a minority of patients receiving HDMTX and may be accompanied by renal dysfunction and potentially life-threatening toxicity. A panel of European physicians with experience in the use of HDMTX as well as of glucarpidase convened to develop a series of consensus statements to provide practical guidance on the prevention and treatment of DME, including the use of glucarpidase. Robust implementation of supportive measures including hyperhydration and urine alkalinization emerged as critical in order to reduce the risk of DME with HDMTX treatment, with leucovorin rescue critical in reducing the risk of DME complications. Early recognition of DME is important to promptly implement appropriate treatment including, intensified hydration, high-dose leucovorin and, when appropriate, glucarpidase.

The impact of the human gut microbiome on the treatment of autoimmune disease

Autoimmune (or rheumatic) diseases are increasing in prevalence but selecting the best therapy for each patient proceeds in trial-and-error fashion. This strategy can lead to ineffective therapy resulting in irreversible damage and suffering; thus, there is a need to bring the promise of precision medicine to patients with autoimmune disease. While host factors partially determine the therapeutic response to immunosuppressive drugs, these are not routinely used to tailor therapy. Thus, non-host factors likely contribute. Here, we consider the impact of the human gut microbiome in the treatment of autoimmunity. We propose that the gut microbiome can be manipulated to improve therapy and to derive greater benefit from existing therapies. We focus on the mechanisms by which the human gut microbiome impacts treatment response, provide a framework to interrogate these mechanisms, review a case study of a widely-used anti-rheumatic drug, and discuss challenges with studying multiple complex systems: the microbiome, the human immune system, and autoimmune disease. We consider open questions that remain in the field and speculate on the future of drug-microbiome-autoimmune disease interactions. Finally, we present a blue-sky vision for how the microbiome can be used to bring the promise of precision medicine to patients with rheumatic disease.

A folate inhibitor exploits metabolic differences in Pseudomonas aeruginosa for narrow-spectrum targeting

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections for which the development of antibiotics is urgently needed. Unlike most enteric bacteria, P. aeruginosa lacks enzymes required to scavenge exogenous thymine. An appealing strategy to selectively target P. aeruginosa is to disrupt thymidine synthesis while providing exogenous thymine. However, known antibiotics that perturb thymidine synthesis are largely inactive against P. aeruginosa.Here we characterize fluorofolin, a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor derived from Irresistin-16, that exhibits significant activity against P. aeruginosa in culture and in a mouse thigh infection model. Fluorofolin is active against a wide range of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates resistant to known antibiotics. Metabolomics and in vitro assays using purified folA confirm that fluorofolin inhibits P. aeruginosa DHFR. Importantly, in the presence of thymine supplementation, fluorofolin activity is selective for P. aeruginosa. Resistance to fluorofolin can emerge through overexpression of the efflux pumps MexCD-OprJ and MexEF-OprN, but these mutants also decrease pathogenesis. Our findings demonstrate how understanding species-specific genetic differences can enable selective targeting of important pathogens while revealing trade-offs between resistance and pathogenesis.

The use of glucarpidase as a rescue therapy for high dose methotrexate toxicity - a review of pharmacological and clinical data

INTRODUCTION

This review aims to summarize recent data on the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety of glucarpidase. This is an enzymatic agent that catalyzes the conversion of methotrexate (MTX) into inactive metabolites. Glucarpidase is used to manage high-dose MTX (HDMTX) toxic plasma concentration, especially in patients with impaired renal function.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, studies on glucarpidase clinical efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients suffering from MTX kidney toxicity were presented. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of glucarpidase were included. Moreover, potential interactions and safety issues were discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of glucarpidase is an effective therapeutic strategy in both adults and children treated with high doses of MTX for various types of cancer who have developed acute renal failure. Glucarpidase causes MTX to be converted to nontoxic metabolites and accelerates the time for its complete elimination. After administration of glucarpidase, it is possible to resume HDMTX.

A pooled subgroup analysis of glucarpidase treatment in 86 pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients receiving high-dose methotrexate therapy in open-label trials

BACKGROUND

Delayed methotrexate elimination can occur in patients undergoing high-dose methotrexate cancer treatment. Effectiveness of glucarpidase for rapidly reducing methotrexate concentrations was shown in compassionate-use trials in patients aged 0-84 years.

METHODS

We performed post hoc analyses of infants (≥28 days to <2 years), children (≥2 to <12 years), adolescents (≥12 to <15 years), and young adults (≥15 to <25 years) from four multicenter, open-label, single-arm, glucarpidase compassionate-use trials. Patients had toxic methotrexate levels due to delayed methotrexate elimination and/or renal dysfunction, and received glucarpidase (50 U/kg). The primary endpoint was clinically important reduction (CIR) in plasma methotrexate (methotrexate ≤1 μmol/L at all post-glucarpidase measurements) based on high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Among 86 patients included in efficacy analyses, CIR was achieved by zero of one infant (0.0%), five of 16 children (31.3%), seven of 24 adolescents (29.2%), and 26/45 young adults (57.8%). Median methotrexate reduction was 98.7% or higher in each group 15 minutes post-glucarpidase. Patients with pre-glucarpidase methotrexate less than 50 μmol/L (35/42, 83.3%) were more likely to achieve CIR than those with methotrexate 50 μmol/L or higher (1/37, 2.7%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was paresthesia, occurring in three adolescents (4.5%) and six young adults (5.2%). No other treatment-related adverse event occurred in 5% or higher of any age group.

CONCLUSION

After accounting for pre-glucarpidase methotrexate levels, glucarpidase efficacy at inducing CIR in pediatric/young adult patients was consistent, with efficacy observed in the overall study population (i.e., patients aged 0-84), and no unexpected safety findings were observed. These findings demonstrate glucarpidase (50 U/kg) is an effective and well-tolerated dose for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients.

Development of a population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics model of glucarpidase rescue treatment after high-dose methotrexate therapy

Introduction

Glucarpidase (CPG2) reduces the lethal toxicity of methotrexate (MTX) by rapid degradation.

Methods

In this study, a CPG2 population pharmacokinetics (popPK) analysis in healthy volunteers (phase 1 study) and a popPK-pharmacodynamics (popPK-PD) analysis in patients (phase 2 study, n = 15) who received 50 U/kg of CPG2 rescue for delayed MTX excretion were conducted. In the phase 2 study, the first CPG2 treatment at a dose of 50 U/kg was intravenously administered for 5 min within 12 h after the first confirmation of delayed MTX excretion. The second dose of CPG2, with a plasma MTX concentration >1 μmol/L, was administered to the patient more than 46 h after the start of CPG2 administration.

Results

The population mean PK parameters (95% CI) of MTX, obtained from the final model post hoc, were estimated as follows: CLr_MTX = 2.424 L/h (95% CI: 1.755-3.093), Vc_MTX = 12.6 L (95% CI: 10.8-14.3), Vp_MTX = 2.15 L (95% CI: 1.60-2.70), and α = 8.131 x 10⁵ (4.864 x 10⁵-11.398 x 10⁵). The final model, including covariates, was CLr_MTX (L/h): 3.248 x Body Weight/Serum creatinine/60 (CV 33.5%), Vc_MTX (L): 0.386 x Body Weight/body surface area (CV 29.1%), Vp_MTX (L):3.052 x Body Weight/60 (CV 90.6%), and α (L/h): 6.545 x 10⁵ (CV 79.8%).

Discussion

These results suggest that the pre-CPG2 dose and 24 h after CPG2 dosing were the most important sampling points in the Bayesian estimation of plasma MTX concentration prediction at 48 h. These CPG2-MTX popPK analysis and Bayesian estimation of rebound in plasma MTX concentrations are clinically important to estimate >1.0 μmol/L 48 h after the first CPG2 dosing.

Clinical trial registration

https://dbcentre3.jmacct.med.or.jp/JMACTR/App/JMACTRS06/JMACTRS06.aspx?seqno=2363, identifier JMA-IIA00078 and https://dbcentre3.jmacct.med.or.jp/JMACTR/App/JMACTRS06/JMACTRS06.aspx?seqno=2782, identifier JMA-IIA00097.

Crystalline Nephropathy With High-Dose Methotrexate in a Patient With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Case Report

Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antimetabolite used in the treatment of several malignancies and rheumatologic diseases. It is metabolized in the liver and excreted via the kidneys. Several adverse effects of MTX have been noted, including bone marrow suppression, mucositis, and hepatic and renal dysfunction. Close monitoring of drug levels, concurrent leucovorin administration, and urinary alkalization with aggressive hydration are some steps taken to prevent these unfavorable outcomes.

We describe a case of a patient with primary CNS lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) who developed methotrexate-induced crystalline nephropathy despite preventative measures. Birefringent needle-shaped crystals were demonstrated under polarized light in the urine sample in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). The slow decay curve of MTX causing renal and hepatic dysfunction was an indication to start glucarpidase, and a subsequent rapid decline in MTX levels with improvement in AKI was observed.

Methotrexate-induced crystalline nephropathy results from damage to the renal tubules, which in most cases is reversible. Patients with a slow decline in MTX levels may be candidates for treatment with glucarpidase, a recombinant form of carboxypeptidase G2, to allow for rapid MTX breakdown and clearance. Hemodialysis is another available treatment option for patients who develop these adverse effects.

Extracorporeal Treatment for Methotrexate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

Methotrexate is used in the treatment of many malignancies, rheumatological diseases, and inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicity from use is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Rescue treatments include intravenous hydration, folinic acid, and, in some centers, glucarpidase. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) methods to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments in the management of methotrexate toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations (either "strong" or "weak/conditional") were graded according to the GRADE approach. A formal voting process using a modified Delphi method assessed the level of agreement between panelists on the final recommendations. A total of 92 articles met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic data were available on 90 patients (89 with impaired kidney function). Methotrexate was considered to be moderately dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis. Data were available for clinical analysis on 109 patients (high-dose methotrexate [>0.5 g/m2]: 91 patients; low-dose [≤0.5 g/m2]: 18). Overall mortality in these publications was 19.5% and 26.7% in those with high-dose and low-dose methotrexate-related toxicity, respectively. Although one observational study reported lower mortality in patients treated with glucarpidase compared with those treated with hemodialysis, there were important limitations in the study. For patients with severe methotrexate toxicity receiving standard care, the EXTRIP workgroup: (1) suggested against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is not administered; (2) recommended against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is administered; and (3) recommended against extracorporeal treatments instead of administering glucarpidase. The quality of evidence for these recommendations was very low. Rationales for these recommendations included: (1) extracorporeal treatments mainly remove drugs in the intravascular compartment, whereas methotrexate rapidly distributes into cells; (2) extracorporeal treatments remove folinic acid; (3) in rare cases where fast removal of methotrexate is required, glucarpidase will outperform any extracorporeal treatment; and (4) extracorporeal treatments do not appear to reduce the incidence and magnitude of methotrexate toxicity.

A Dose-Confirmation Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacology of Glucarpidase in Healthy Volunteers

Glucarpidase rapidly decomposes methotrexate. A phase 1 study of glucarpidase in an open‐label, randomized parallel group was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and other pharmacologic effects in Japanese healthy volunteers without methotrexate treatment. A dose of 50 U/kg (n = 8) or 20 U/kg (n = 8) of glucarpidase was administered as an intravenous injection, with 1 repeated dose at 48 hours after the first dose. No dose‐limiting toxicities, no significant clinical examination findings, and no clinically relevant differences between dose levels were observed. The pharmacokinetic parameters at a first dose of 20 or 50 U/kg were similar to those at a second dose and were as follows: half‐life, 7.45 and 7.25 hours; area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity, 8.25 and 19.05 μg·h/mL; total clearance, 4.85 and 5.47 mL/min; and volume of distribution during the elimination phase, 3.12 and 3.41 L, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve increased in a generally linear dose‐proportional manner. An ethnicity specificity in the pharmacokinetic profile was not observed in Japanese volunteers. The serum folate concentration decreased after glucarpidase administration in all the volunteers. The production of anti‐glucarpidase antibody was observed in many cases in both cohorts. Although the long‐term effect of anti‐glucarpidase antibody will need to be investigated in the future, the effects produced by the anti‐glucarpidase antibody were not influenced by the pharmacokinetics of glucarpidase within 96 hours after the first dose. The observed safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics support the continued evaluation of glucarpidase in the patients with lethal methotrexate toxicities.

Quantification of Methotrexate in Human Serum Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Toward Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve clinical care when using drugs with pharmacokinetic variability and a narrow therapeutic window. Rapid, reliable, and easy-to-use detection methods are required in order to decrease the time of analysis and can also enable TDM in resource-limited settings or even at bedside. Monitoring methotrexate (MTX), an anticancer drug, is critical since it is needed to follow the drug clearance rate and decide how to administer the rescue drug, leucovorin (LV), in order to avoid toxicity and even death. We show that with the optimized nanopillar-assisted separation (NPAS) method using surface-enhanced Raman scattering, we were able to measure MTX in PBS and serum in the linear range of 5-150 μM and confirmed that MTX detection can be carried out even in the presence of LV. Additionally, when NPAS was combined with centrifugal filtration, a quantification limit of 2.1 μM for MTX in human serum sample was achieved. The developed detection method enables fast detection (10 min) and quantification of MTX from human serum (>90% accuracy). Furthermore, we show the potential of the developed method for TDM, when quantifying MTX from clinical samples, collected from patients who are undergoing high-dose MTX therapy.

The safety of current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for osteosarcoma

Introduction: Peri-operative chemotherapy is the backbone of treatment for patients with osteosarcoma. Methotrexate, cisplatinum, doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the main drugs used in chemotherapy regimens used for osteosarcoma.Areas covered: We have reviewed here the relevant literature related to the incidence and management of acute and late toxicities of systemic treatment used for the management of patients with osteosarcoma.Expert opinion: Early diagnosis and appropriate management of acute and late toxicities of chemotherapy is crucial for an efficient care of osteosarcoma patients. Although the incidence and management of chemotherapy-related acute toxicities are well known by most oncologists, the use of high doses of methotrexate have the potential to cause fatal toxicities and, therefore, needs careful monitoring. Moreover, the diagnosis of late toxicities is more challenging and requires long-term follow-up for an appropriate management.

Renal replacement therapy in the management of intoxications in children: recommendations from the Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (PCRRT) workgroup

BACKGROUND

Intentional or unintentional ingestions among children and adolescents are common. There are a number of ingestions amenable to renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for literature regarding drugs/intoxicants and treatment with RRT in pediatric populations. Two experts from the PCRRT (Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy) workgroup assessed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for extraction of data. The data from the literature search was shared with the PCRRT workgroup and two expert toxicologists, and expert panel recommendations were developed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We have presented the recommendations concerning the use of RRTs for treatment of intoxications with toxic alcohols, lithium, vancomycin, theophylline, barbiturates, metformin, carbamazepine, methotrexate, phenytoin, acetaminophen, salicylates, valproic acid, and aminoglycosides.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric and adult oncology patients

PURPOSE

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is widely used in pediatric and adult oncology treatment regimens. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize pediatric and adult MTX exposure across various disease types and dosing regimens, and to evaluate exposure-toxicity relationships.

METHODS

MTX pharmacokinetic data from pediatric and adult patients were collected. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to determine the effects of age, liver function, renal function, and demographics on MTX disposition. The final model was used in Monte Carlo simulations to generate expected exposures for different dosing regimens. The association of toxicity, determined through chart review, and MTX area under the curve (AUC) was modeled using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The analysis included 5116 MTX concentrations from 320 patients (135 adult, age 19-79 years; 185 pediatric, age 0.6-19 years). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and treatment cycle number were independent predictors of clearance (CL). CL varied 2.1-fold over the range of study eGFR values and increased 14% for treatment cycle numbers greater than 7. Higher MTX AUC was associated with higher risk of nephrotoxicity in adults, and neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in pediatrics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents one of the most comprehensive evaluations of HD-MTX PK across a wide range of ages and disease types. After accounting for differences in renal function, age did not impact CL, although toxicity patterns differed by age. The model allows for early identification of patients with slowed MTX clearance and at higher risk of toxicity.

Consensus Guideline for Use of Glucarpidase in Patients with High-Dose Methotrexate Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Delayed Methotrexate Clearance

An expert panel was convened to provide specific, expert consensus guidelines for the use of glucarpidase in patients who develop high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX)‐induced nephrotoxicity and delayed methotrexate excretion. This guideline provides recommendations to identify the population of patients who would benefit from glucarpidase rescue by more precisely defining the absolute methotrexate concentrations associated with risk for severe or life‐threatening toxicity at several time points after the start of a HDMTX infusion.

Acute kidney injury due to high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is a serious, life‐threatening toxicity that can occur in pediatric and adult patients. Glucarpidase is a treatment approved by the Food and Drug Administration for high methotrexate concentrations in the context of kidney dysfunction, but the guidelines for when to use it are unclear. An expert panel was convened to provide specific, expert consensus guidelines for the use of glucarpidase in patients who develop HDMTX‐induced nephrotoxicity and delayed methotrexate excretion. The guideline provides recommendations to identify the population of patients who would benefit from glucarpidase rescue by more precisely defining the absolute methotrexate concentrations associated with risk for severe or life‐threatening toxicity at several time points after the start of an HDMTX infusion. For an HDMTX infusion ≤24 hours, if the 36‐hour concentration is above 30 µM, 42‐hour concentration is above 10 µM, or 48‐hour concentration is above 5 µM and the serum creatinine is significantly elevated relative to the baseline measurement (indicative of HDMTX‐induced acute kidney injury), glucarpidase may be indicated. After a 36‐ to 42‐hour HDMTX infusion, glucarpidase may be indicated when the 48‐hour methotrexate concentration is above 5 µM. Administration of glucarpidase should optimally occur within 48–60 hours from the start of the HDMTX infusion, because life‐threatening toxicities may not be preventable beyond this time point.

Implications for Practice.

Glucarpidase is a rarely used medication that is less effective when given after more than 60 hours of exposure to high‐dose methotrexate, so predicting early which patients will need it is imperative. There are no currently available consensus guidelines for the use of this medication. The indication on the label does not give specific methotrexate concentrations above which it should be used. An international group of experts was convened to develop a consensus guideline that was specific and evidence‐based to identify the population of patients who would benefit from glucarpidase.

Delayed elimination of high-dose methotrexate and use of carboxypeptidase G2 in pediatric patients during treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Carboxypeptidase G2 (CPDG₂ ) can be used as rescue treatment in cases of delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) and Mtx-induced nephrotoxicity.

PROCEDURE

Between July 2008 and December 2014, all children (1.0-17.9 years) in the Nordic countries diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were treated according to the Nordic Organization for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL 2008 protocol, including administration of six to eight high-dose (5 g/m² /24 hr) Mtx (HDMtx) courses. The protocol includes recommendations for CPDG₂ administration in cases of DME (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01305655).

RESULTS

Forty-seven of the 1,286 children (3.6%) received CPDG₂ during 50 HDMtx courses at a median dose of 50 IU/kg. In 49% of the cases, CPDG₂ was used during the first HDMtx course. Within a median of 6 hr from CPDG₂ administration, the Mtx concentration decreased by 75% when measured with immune-based methods, and by 100% when measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. The median time from the start of Mtx infusion to plasma levels ≤ 0.2 μM was 228 hr (range: 48-438). The maximum increase in plasma creatinine was 375% (range: 100-1,310). Creatinine peaked after a median of 48 hr (range: 36-86). Mtx elimination time was shorter in patients with body surface area < 1 m² (median 198.5 vs. 257 hr; P = 0.004) and was inversely correlated to the maximum creatinine increase (209 vs. 258 hr; P = 0.034). All patients normalized their renal function as measured with s-creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

CPDG₂ administration is highly effective as rescue in case of delayed Mtx clearance. Subsequent HDMtx courses could be administered without events in most of the patients.

Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate

: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), defined as a dose higher than 500 mg/m2, is used to treat a range of adult and childhood cancers. Although HDMTX is safely administered to most patients, it can cause significant toxicity, including acute kidney injury (AKI) in 2%-12% of patients. Nephrotoxicity results from crystallization of methotrexate in the renal tubular lumen, leading to tubular toxicity. AKI and other toxicities of high-dose methotrexate can lead to significant morbidity, treatment delays, and diminished renal function. Risk factors for methotrexate-associated toxicity include a history of renal dysfunction, volume depletion, acidic urine, and drug interactions. Renal toxicity leads to impaired methotrexate clearance and prolonged exposure to toxic concentrations, which further worsen renal function and exacerbate nonrenal adverse events, including myelosuppression, mucositis, dermatologic toxicity, and hepatotoxicity. Serum creatinine, urine output, and serum methotrexate concentration are monitored to assess renal clearance, with concurrent hydration, urinary alkalinization, and leucovorin rescue to prevent and mitigate AKI and subsequent toxicity. When delayed methotrexate excretion or AKI occurs despite preventive strategies, increased hydration, high-dose leucovorin, and glucarpidase are usually sufficient to allow renal recovery without the need for dialysis. Prompt recognition and effective treatment of AKI and associated toxicities mitigate further toxicity, facilitate renal recovery, and permit patients to receive other chemotherapy or resume HDMTX therapy when additional courses are indicated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), defined as a dose higher than 500 mg/m2, is used for a range of cancers. Although HDMTX is safely administered to most patients, it can cause significant toxicity, including acute kidney injury (AKI), attributable to crystallization of methotrexate in the renal tubular lumen, leading to tubular toxicity. When AKI occurs despite preventive strategies, increased hydration, high-dose leucovorin, and glucarpidase allow renal recovery without the need for dialysis. This article, based on a review of the current associated literature, provides comprehensive recommendations for prevention of toxicity and, when necessary, detailed treatment guidance to mitigate AKI and subsequent toxicity.

Selumetinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway regulates processes involved in the proliferation and survival of cells. KRAS mutations, prevalent in approximately 30% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), result in constitutive activation of the pathway. Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is a potent and selective inhibitor of MEK1/2 which has demonstrated significant efficacy in combination with docetaxel in patients with KRAS mutant pretreated advanced NSCLC. Several trials in combination with other chemotherapy and targeted therapy regimens in lung cancer are ongoing. We review the development of selumetinib in patients with NSCLC, summarize the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and tolerability characteristics, and the available clinical trial data to understand the role of selumetinib in the treatment of NSCLC.

Enzymes approved for human therapy: indications, mechanisms and adverse effects

Research and drug developments fostered under orphan drug product development programs have greatly assisted the introduction of efficient and safe enzyme-based therapies for a range of rare disorders. The introduction and regulatory approval of 20 different recombinant enzymes has enabled, often for the first time, effective enzyme-replacement therapy for some lysosomal storage disorders, including Gaucher (imiglucerase, taliglucerase, and velaglucerase), Fabry (agalsidase alfa and beta), and Pompe (alglucosidase alfa) diseases and mucopolysaccharidoses I (laronidase), II (idursulfase), IVA (elosulfase), and VI (galsulfase). Approved recombinant enzymes are also now used as therapy for myocardial infarction (alteplase, reteplase, and tenecteplase), cystic fibrosis (dornase alfa), chronic gout (pegloticase), tumor lysis syndrome (rasburicase), leukemia (L-asparaginase), some collagen-based disorders such as Dupuytren's contracture (collagenase), severe combined immunodeficiency disease (pegademase bovine), detoxification of methotrexate (glucarpidase), and vitreomacular adhesion (ocriplasmin). The development of these efficacious and safe enzyme-based therapies has occurred hand in hand with some remarkable advances in the preparation of the often specifically designed recombinant enzymes; the manufacturing expertise necessary for commercial production; our understanding of underlying mechanisms operative in the different diseases; and the mechanisms of action of the relevant recombinant enzymes. Together with information on these mechanisms, safety findings recorded so far on the various adverse events and problems of immunogenicity of the recombinant enzymes used for therapy are presented.

Comparable efficacy with varying dosages of glucarpidase in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Glucarpidase rapidly reduces methotrexate plasma concentrations in patients experiencing methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction. Debate exists regarding the role of glucarpidase in therapy given its high cost. The use of reduced-dose glucarpidase has been reported, and may allow more institutions to supply this drug to their patients. This report explores the relationship between glucarpidase dosage and patient outcomes in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

The authors evaluated data from 26 patients who received glucarpidase after high-dose methotrexate. Decrease in plasma methotrexate concentrations and time to renal recovery were evaluated for an association with glucarpidase dosage, which ranged from 13 to 90 units/kg.

RESULTS

No significant relationship was found between glucarpidase dosage (units/kg) and percent decrease in methotrexate plasma concentrations measured by TDx (P > 0.1) or HPLC (P > 0.5). Patients who received glucarpidase dosages <50 units/kg had a median percent reduction in methotrexate plasma concentration of 99.4% (range, 98-100) measured by HPLC compared to a median percent reduction of 99.4% (range, 77.2-100) in patients who received ≥50 units/kg. Time to SCr recovery was not related to glucarpidase dosage (P > 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of glucarpidase in the treatment of HDMTX-induced kidney injury was not dosage-dependent in this retrospective analysis of pediatric oncology patients.

Glucarpidase Intervention for Delayed Methotrexate Clearance

Objective: To review and evaluate the current published literature on the effectiveness and safety of glucarpidase and to determine its potential role in clinical practice. Data Sources: A PubMed literature search from 1946 to January 2014 was performed using the search terms carboxypeptidase G2, glucarpidase, high-dose methotrexate, and leucovorin rescue. Additional references were identified by reviewing the references from the PubMed search articles. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language clinical trials and retrospective studies assessing the safety and effectiveness of glucarpidase were included. Case reports were excluded. Data Synthesis: A total of 5 non-randomized, prospective studies and 1 retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of glucarpidase in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. In these studies, glucarpidase conferred a >87% reduction in serum methotrexate concentrations (sMTX) and was well tolerated. Although a substantial reduction in sMTX was observed, clinically significant outcomes such as the need for dialysis, time to administration of next chemotherapy cycle, and methotrexate toxicity-related mortality were not consistently evaluated. Conclusions: Glucarpidase is effective in lowering sMTX in patients with delayed methotrexate clearance and renal dysfunction. Considering the relatively high cost of glucarpidase, it should be reserved for specific patients who have not responded to standard supportive care measures.

Methotrexate nephrotoxicity: Novel treatment, new approach

This is the report of a case of methotrexate nephrotoxicity for which glucarpidase was used. We use the case to review a number of teaching points related to this new treatment option.

Efficacy of glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase g2) in patients with acute kidney injury after high-dose methotrexate therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Because the incidence rate of renal impairment is 2-10% for patients treated with high-dose methotrexate and renal impairment develops in 0-12.4% of patients treated for osteosarcoma, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of glucarpidase, a recently approved drug that rapidly hydrolyzes methotrexate to inactive metabolites, which allows for nonrenal clearance in patients with delayed renal methotrexate elimination.

DESIGN

Pooled analysis of efficacy data from four multicenter single-arm compassionate-use clinical trials using protocols from 1993 to 2007.

PATIENTS

Of 476 patients with renal toxicity and delayed methotrexate elimination who were treated with intravenous glucarpidase for rescue after high-dose methotrexate, 169 patients had at least one preglucarpidase (baseline) plasma methotrexate concentration greater than 1 μmol/L and one postglucarpidase methotrexate concentration measurement by high-performance liquid chromatography and were included in the efficacy analysis; renal recovery was assessed in 436 patients who had at least one recorded preglucarpidase and postglucarpidase serum creatinine concentration measurement.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Efficacy was defined as rapid and sustained clinically important reduction (RSCIR) in plasma methotrexate concentration, with a concentration of 1 μmol/L or lower at all postglucarpidase determinations. Median age of efficacy-evaluable patients was 20 years (range 5 weeks-84 years). Osteosarcoma (36%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (27%), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20%) were the most frequent underlying diagnoses. Median preglucarpidase serum methotrexate was 11.7 μmol/L. At the first (median 15 minutes) through the last (median 40 hours) postglucarpidase measurement, plasma methotrexate concentrations demonstrated consistent 99% median reduction. RSCIR was achieved by 83 (59%) of 140 patients. A total of 64% of patients with renal impairment greater than or equal to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2 recovered to grade 0 or 1 at a median of 12.5 days after glucarpidase administration.

CONCLUSION

Glucarpidase caused a clinically important 99% or greater sustained reduction of serum methotrexate levels and provided noninvasive rescue from methotrexate toxicity in renally impaired patients.

Glucarpidase to combat toxic levels of methotrexate in patients

In January 2012, glucarpidase (Voraxaze^®) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for intravenous treatment of toxic plasma methotrexate concentrations due to impaired renal clearance. Methotrexate, an antifolate agent, has been used for over 60 years in the treatment of various cancers. High-dose methotrexate has been particularly useful in the treatment of leukemias and lymphomas. However, even with aggressive hydration and urine alkalinization, such regimens can lead to acute renal dysfunction, as indicated by decreases in urine production and concomitant increases in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels. Because methotrexate is largely excreted by the kidneys, this can greatly potentiate tissue damage. Toxic levels of blood methotrexate can be rapidly and effectively decreased by intravenous administration of glucarpidase. Glucarpidase is a recombinant form of carboxypeptidase G2, a bacterial enzyme that rapidly cleaves methotrexate to form the amino acid glutamate and 2,4-diamino-N¹⁰-methylpteroic acid. Catabolites of methotrexate are much less toxic than the parent compound, and are primarily excreted by hepatic mechanisms. Glucarpidase has been available on a compassionate basis since the 1990s, and a variety of case reports and larger clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this drug in patients ranging in age from infants to the elderly and in a variety of races and ethnic groups. Glucarpidase should not be administered within 2 hours of leucovorin, because this agent is a reduced folate which competes with methotrexate for the enzyme and glucarpidase inactivates leucovorin. Side effects of glucarpidase are rare and relatively mild, and include paraesthesia, flushing, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and headache. Glucarpidase has seen limited use in intrathecal treatment of methotrexate toxicity for which it is also effective. Future applications of this enzyme in chemotherapy continue to be an active area of research.

Involvement of Multiple Transporters-mediated Transports in Mizoribine and Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics

Mizoribine is administered orally and excreted into urine without being metabolized. Many research groups have reported a linear relationship between the dose and peak serum concentration, between the dose and AUC, and between AUC and cumulative urinary excretion of mizoribine. In contrast, a significant interindividual variability, with a small intraindividual variability, in oral bioavailability of mizoribine is also reported. The interindividual variability is mostly considered to be due to the polymophisms of transporter genes. Methotrexate (MTX) is administered orally and/or by parenteral routes, depending on the dose. Metabolic enzymes and multiple transporters are involved in the pharmacokinetics of MTX. The oral bioavailability of MTX exhibits a marked interindividual variability and saturation with increase in the dose of MTX, with a small intraindividual variability, where the contribution of gene polymophisms of transporters and enzymes is suggested. Therapeutic drug monitoring of both mizoribine and MTX is expected to improve their clinical efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Glucarpidase

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available on-line. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X. A drug class review is now published monthly with The Formulary Monograph Service. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The June 2012 monograph topics are on peginesatide, mitomycin for solution, lucinactant, mifepristone, and perampanel. The DUE/MUE is on peginesatide.

Rational administration schedule for high-dose methotrexate in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

Methotrexate (MTX) at a dose of ≥1 g/m(2) remains the most efficient treatment against primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and is the most widely used drug in prospective clinical trials. MTX is a folate analog that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, thereby blocking de novo purine synthesis. MTX as well as 7-hydroxy-MTX, its main metabolite in serum, are both eliminated by the kidneys. The elimination of MTX is prolonged in patients with renal impairment and third-space fluid collections, and in patients receiving concurrent non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, benzimidazoles and sulfonamides, among others. Main adverse events with high-dose MTX include severe myelosuppression, renal dysfunction and stomatitis. Supportive measures such as rigorous hydration, urine alkalinization and careful drug monitoring with supplemental leucovorin rescue are crucial to avoid significant toxicity. Strategies to optimize clinical efficacy of high-dose MTX in patients with PCNSL include administration of 3 h instead of longer infusions, potentially supplemented with an additional intravenous MTX bolus, and maintaining MTX dose intensity over the course of four treatment cycles. Some pharmacological studies suggest that achieving an MTX area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(MTX)) of between 1000 and 1100 μmol.h/L may improve clinical outcome, but clinical data are not conclusive at present. In this review, we analyze the impact of patient, lymphoma and pharmacokinetic variables on the antitumor activity of high-dose MTX in patients with PCNSL, summarize recommendations for daily clinical practice and give some suggestions for future trials.

Suspected methotrexate toxicity from omeprazole: a case review of carboxypeptidase G2 use in a methotrexate-experienced patient with methotrexate toxicity and a review of the literature

We report a case of methotrexate toxicity potentially induced by a drug interaction between methotrexate and omeprazole in a 25-year-old man with osteosarcoma. The patient was placed on omeprazole after his first cycle of high-dose methotrexate for stress ulcer prophylaxis, and it was discontinued before the start of the first day of the patient's second round of high-dose methotrexate. The 24-hour methotrexate level was elevated and he continued to have sustained levels for 18 days. Side effects due to elevated serum methotrexate included seizures, mucositis, acute renal failure, and thrombocytopenia. Aggressive hydration, urinary alkalinization, and leucovorin were continued during the period of elevated methotrexate levels, with the patient receiving a course of hemodialysis and a dose of carboxypeptidase G2. The patient's symptoms resolved, and his renal function returned to baseline within 2 months. The patient was able to receive future courses of chemotherapy without methotrexate. Although use of the Naranjo adverse reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship (score of 6) between the patient's development of methotrexate toxicity and omeprazole use, we believe this was a drug-drug interaction case consistent with previous reports in the literature.

Dosing algorithm to target a predefined AUC in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma receiving high dose methotrexate

AIM

There is no consensus regarding optimal dosing of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma. Our aim was to develop a convenient dosing algorithm to target AUC(MTX) in the range between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h.

METHODS

A population covariate model from a pooled dataset of 131 patients receiving HDMTX was used to simulate concentration-time curves of 10,000 patients and test the efficacy of a dosing algorithm based on 24 h MTX plasma concentrations to target the prespecified AUC(MTX) . These data simulations included interindividual, interoccasion and residual unidentified variability. Patients received a total of four simulated cycles of HDMTX and adjusted MTX dosages were given for cycles two to four.

RESULTS

The dosing algorithm proposes MTX dose adaptations ranging from +75% in patients with MTX C(24) < 0.5 µmol l(-1) up to -35% in patients with MTX C(24) > 12 µmol l(-1). The proposed dosing algorithm resulted in a marked improvement of the proportion of patients within the AUC(MTX) target between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h (11% with standard MTX dose, 35% with the adjusted dose) and a marked reduction of the interindividual variability of MTX exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple and practical dosing algorithm for HDMTX has been developed based on MTX 24 h plasma concentrations, and its potential efficacy in improving the proportion of patients within a prespecified target AUC(MTX) and reducing the interindividual variability of MTX exposure has been shown by data simulations. The clinical benefit of this dosing algorithm should be assessed in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

Resumption of high-dose methotrexate after acute kidney injury and glucarpidase use in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-induced acute kidney injury is a rare but life-threatening complication. The methotrexate rescue agent glucarpidase rapidly hydrolyzes methotrexate to inactive metabolites. The authors retrospectively reviewed glucarpidase use in pediatric cancer patients at their institution and evaluated whether subsequent resumption of HDMTX was tolerated.

METHODS

Clinical data and outcomes of all patients who received glucarpidase after HDMTX administration were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 1141 patients who received 4909 courses of HDMTX, 20 patients (1.8% of patients, 0.4% of courses) received 22 doses of glucarpidase. The median glucarpidase dose was 51.6 U/kg (range, 13-65.6 U/kg). At the time of administration, the median plasma methotrexate concentration was 29.1 μM (range, 1.3-590.6 μM). Thirteen of the 20 patients received a total of 39 courses of HDMTX therapy after glucarpidase. The median time to complete methotrexate excretion was 355 hours (range, 244-763 hours) for the HDMTX course during which glucarpidase was administered, 90 hours (range, 66-268 hours) for the next HDMTX course, and 72 hours (range, 42-116 hours) for subsequent courses. The median peak serum creatinine level during these HDMTX courses was 2.2 mg/dL (range, 0.8-9.6 mg/dL), 0.8 mg/dL (range, 0.4-1.6 mg/dL), and 0.6 mg/dL (range, 0.4-0.9 mg/dL), respectively. One patient experienced nephrotoxicity upon rechallenge with HDMTX. Renal function eventually returned to baseline in all patients, and no patient died as a result of methotrexate toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that it is possible to safely resume HDMTX therapy after glucarpidase treatment for HDMTX-induced acute kidney injury.

Two pediatric osteosarcoma cases with delayed methotrexate excretion: its clinical course and management

High-dose methotrexate (MTX) chemotherapy extends the duration of hospitalization and introduces the risks of serious complications related to delayed MTX excretion. The treatment of delayed MTX excretion is largely dependent on invasive measures such as hemodialysis because the clinical data regarding the efficacy or safety of carboxypetidase G(2) is limited. We report here on the cases of two pediatric osteosarcoma patients with delayed MTX excretion and who were successfully managed using supportive measures. Potential life-threatening complications were prevented by administering high doses of leucovorin.

Glucarpidase, leucovorin, and thymidine for high-dose methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction: clinical and pharmacologic factors affecting outcome

PURPOSE

To assess the role of the recombinant bacterial enzyme, glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase-G(2)), leucovorin, and thymidine in the management and outcome of patients with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) -induced nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

Patients with HDMTX-induced nephrotoxicity received one to three doses of intravenous (IV) glucarpidase and leucovorin rescue. The initial cohort (n = 35) also received thymidine by continuous IV infusion. Subsequently, thymidine was restricted to patients with prolonged exposure (> 96 hours) to methotrexate (MTX) or with substantial MTX toxicity at study entry. Plasma MTX, leucovorin, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF) concentrations were measured pre- and postglucarpidase. Toxicities were monitored, and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of baseline characteristics to the development of severe toxicity and death.

RESULTS

Glucarpidase was administered at a median of 96 hours (receiving thymidine, n = 44) and 66 hours (not receiving thymidine, n = 56) after the start of the MTX infusion. Plasma MTX concentrations decreased within 15 minutes of glucarpidase by 98.7%. Plasma 5-mTHF concentrations also decreased more than 98% after administration of glucarpidase. Of 12 deaths, six were directly attributed to irreversible MTX toxicity. Presence of grade 4 toxicity before administration of glucarpidase, inadequate initial increase in leucovorin dosing, and administration of glucarpidase more than 96 hours after the start of the MTX infusion were associated with development of grade 4 and 5 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Early intervention with the combination of leucovorin and glucarpidase is highly effective in patients who develop HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction. Severe toxicity and mortality occurred in patients in whom glucarpidase rescue was delayed and occurred despite thymidine administration.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method for monitoring methotrexate in the setting of carboxypeptidase-G2 therapy

Medications that have a narrow therapeutic window must be regularly monitored to assist in clinical dosing. Methotrexate (MTX) is one such chemotherapeutic agent that is closely monitored using various standard assays. Patients who have renal failure and who are treated using high-dose protocols are often given carboxypeptidase-G2 (CPDG(2)) as a chemoprotective agent. In this setting an inactive metabolite of MTX, 2, 4-diamino-N(10)-methylpteroic acid (DAMPA) is produced. DAMPA cross-reacts with MTX in most immunoassays, thus making them unsuitable for the monitoring of MTX in the setting of CPDG(2) therapy. We describe a rapid LC-MS-MS method that can be used to determine MTX levels in these cases.

High-dose methotrexate and rituximab with deferred radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary B-cell CNS lymphoma

We conducted a prospective Phase II study of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and rituximab with deferred whole brain radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed B-cell primary central nervous system lymphoma with a primary objective of evaluating progression-free survival (PFS). Forty patients (25 men; 15 women), ages 18-93 years (median 61.5), were treated. All patients received biweekly HD-MTX/rituximab (8 g/m(2)/dose; 375 mg/m(2)/dose) for 4-6 cycles (induction) and following best radiographic response, with every 4 weeks HD-MTX (8 g/m(2)/dose) for 4 cycles (maintenance). Neurological and neuroradiographic evaluation were performed every 4 weeks during induction therapy and every 8 weeks during maintenance therapy. All patients were evaluable. A total of 303 cycles of HD-MTX (median 8 cycles; range 4-10) was administered. HD-MTX/rituximab-related toxicity included 16 grade 3 adverse events in 13 patients (32.5%). Following induction, 8 patients (20%) demonstrated progressive disease and discontinued therapy; 32 patients (80%) demonstrated a partial (8/40; 20%) or complete (24/40; 60%) radiographic response. At the conclusion of maintenance therapy (6-10 months of total therapy), 28 patients (70%) demonstrated either a partial (1/28) or complete (27/28) response. Overall, survival of these 28 patients ranged from 11 to 80 months (median 33.5). Survival in the entire cohort ranged from 6 to 80 months with an estimated median of 29 months. Overall, PFS ranged from 2 to 80 months (median 21.0). HD-MTX/rituximab and deferred radiotherapy demonstrated similar or better efficacy similar to other HD-MTX-only regimens and reduced time on therapy on average to 6 months.

Drugs and pharmaceuticals: management of intoxication and antidotes

The treatment of patients poisoned with drugs and pharmaceuticals can be quite challenging. Diverse exposure circumstances, varied clinical presentations, unique patient-specific factors, and inconsistent diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure support, coupled with relatively few definitive antidotes, may complicate evaluation and management. The historical approach to poisoned patients (patient arousal, toxin elimination, and toxin identification) has given way to rigorous attention to the fundamental aspects of basic life support--airway management, oxygenation and ventilation, circulatory competence, thermoregulation, and substrate availability. Selected patients may benefit from methods to alter toxin pharmacokinetics to minimize systemic, target organ, or tissue compartment exposure (either by decreasing absorption or increasing elimination). These may include syrup of ipecac, orogastric lavage, activated single- or multi-dose charcoal, whole bowel irrigation, endoscopy and surgery, urinary alkalinization, saline diuresis, or extracorporeal methods (hemodialysis, charcoal hemoperfusion, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, and exchange transfusion). Pharmaceutical adjuncts and antidotes may be useful in toxicant-induced hyperthermias. In the context of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anticholinergic, anticonvulsant, antihyperglycemic, antimicrobial, antineoplastic, cardiovascular, opioid, or sedative-hypnotic agents overdose, N-acetylcysteine, physostigmine, L-carnitine, dextrose, octreotide, pyridoxine, dexrazoxane, leucovorin, glucarpidase, atropine, calcium, digoxin-specific antibody fragments, glucagon, high-dose insulin euglycemia therapy, lipid emulsion, magnesium, sodium bicarbonate, naloxone, and flumazenil are specifically reviewed. In summary, patients generally benefit from aggressive support of vital functions, careful history and physical examination, specific laboratory analyses, a thoughtful consideration of the risks and benefits of decontamination and enhanced elimination, and the use of specific antidotes where warranted. Data supporting antidotes effectiveness vary considerably. Clinicians are encouraged to utilize consultation with regional poison centers or those with toxicology training to assist with diagnosis, management, and administration of antidotes, particularly in unfamiliar cases.