Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. Myeloma Aredia Study Group

Prediction of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients Receiving Antiresorptive Therapy Using Machine Learning Models

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication associated with the use of antiresorptive agents, impacting patient quality of life and treatment outcomes. Predictive modeling may aid in a better understanding of MRONJ development.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate machine learning (ML)-based models for predicting MRONJ in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This retrospective in silico study analyzed electronic medical records from Thammasat University Hospital, covering the period from January 2012 to December 2022. The sample included subjects receiving antiresorptive therapy, excluding those with a history of radiation therapy or metastatic jaw disease.

PREDICTOR VARIABLES

The primary predictor variable was the predicted probability of MRONJ development from the ML models.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

The outcome variable was MRONJ status coded as present or absent based on chart review.

COVARIATES

Covariates included demographic data, MRONJ occurrence, location and staging of MRONJ, comorbidities, diseases related to antiresorptive agents, types of antiresorptive agents, therapy duration, concurrent medications, blood calcium levels, and dental factors.

ANALYSES

Model performance was assessed via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors significantly associated with MRONJ development. P ≤ .05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study analyzed data from 5,305 subjects with a mean age of 75 ± 11.1 years, predominantly female. MRONJ was observed in 81 cases (1.5%), with a median time to development of 33 months (interquartile range = 3). Among the 6 models tested, the best-performing model had an accuracy of 0.95 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89-0.90. Significant predictors identified through Cox regression included metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio = 14.064, 95% confidence interval = 1.111-178.067, P = .041) and patients receiving intravenous pamidronate (hazard ratio = 5.932, 95% confidence interval = 1.755-20.051, P = .004), indicating their association with MRONJ development.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

ML-based predictive and time-to-event models effectively predict MRONJ risk, aiding in the strategic prevention and management for patients undergoing antiresorptive therapy.

Evidence-based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions

Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy, is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Recent treatment advances have significantly improved patient outcomes associated with MM. In this study, we aimed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of MM. We identified 12 key clinical questions essential for MM management, guiding the extensive literature review and meta-analysis of the study. Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by integrating patient preferences with survey data. These recommendations include current and emerging diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies. By prioritizing a patient-centered approach and rigorous data analysis, these guidelines were developed to enhance MM management, both in Korea and globally.

Efficacy and safety of bone management agents administered at 12 weeks vs. 4 weeks in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer patients with bone metastases. In this meta-analysis, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were studied based on a de-escalation strategy in which the BMA dosing interval was prolonged from 4 to 12 weeks.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, ICHUSHI, and CINAHL were searched for articles on BMA dosing intervals from outcomes measured were the incidence of SRE and related various AEs. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULT

The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of Zoledronic acid hydrate (ZA) (n = 2663) and six RCTs (n = 141) on BMA other than ZA. There was no difference in the incidence of SREs when comparing the dosing frequency of 12 versus 4 weeks for BMA (RR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.82-1.78], p = 0.33). Further, AEs related to treatment discontinuation were significantly less frequent with ZA given every 12 weeks than when given every 4 weeks (RR = 0.51 [0.30-0.89], p = 0.02). In particular, renal dysfunction leading to grade ≥3 or discontinuation of treatment with ZA occurred significantly less frequently with every 12-week dosing (RR = 0.33 [0.12-0.91], p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed no influence of BMA de-escalation on the incidence of SRE; nevertheless, AEs appeared to reduce with the de-escalated usage of ZA.

Survey of the association between tooth extraction and development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients undergoing cancer treatment with bone-modifying agents

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to verify whether tooth extraction before the administration of bone-modifying agents (BMA) was effective in preventing the onset of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with a history of receiving BMA for cancer treatment. The patients were classified into three groups based on the timing of tooth extraction: no tooth extraction before the onset of MRONJ, tooth extraction before the administration of BMA, and tooth extraction after the administration of BMA. The incidence of MRONJ was compared between the groups. Fisher's exact test and Bonferroni correction were used to test for differences in proportions between the three groups.

RESULTS

The total number of subjects was 123. Twenty-four patients (19.5%) developed MRONJ. The incidence rates were 12.3% (10/81), 17.9% (5/28), and 64.3% (9/14) in the non-extraction group, the extraction before BMA administration group, and the extraction after BMA administration group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences between the extraction after BMA administration group and the non-extraction groups and between the extraction after BMA administration group and the extraction before BMA administration group (p < 0.001, p = 0.0049). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence between the non-extraction and the extraction before BMA administration group (p = 0.5274).

CONCLUSIONS

Tooth extraction before the administration of BMA is effective in preventing the onset of MRONJ in patients receiving BMA for cancer treatment. Prevention of MRONJ development in patients receiving BMA for cancer treatment contributes to the maintenance of patients' quality of life.

Functional outcomes after open reconstruction or nonoperative management of 81 pathologic acetabular fractures from metastatic bone disease

Background

Pathologic acetabular fracture secondary to skeletal metastasis may result in debilitating pain, inability to ambulate, and impaired quality of life, which may mark the first period of dependent care in cancer patients. Acetabular reconstruction may involve morbid procedures with increased complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of pain, performance status, and ambulation following nonoperative management or open reconstruction of pathologic acetabular fractures.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 2630 adult patients with osseous metastatic disease treated at a high-volume cancer center between 2005 and 2021 was screened for pathologic fractures of the acetabulum. The study outcomes were pain, performance status, and the ability to ambulate. We identified 78 patients (median age, 60 years; 37 female patients [46%]) with 81 fractures. Of these, treatment consisted of open reconstruction (n = 34) or nonoperative management alone (n = 47). The mean follow-up in surviving patients was 3.4 years.

Results

Open reconstruction was performed more frequently for displaced fractures (P < 0.01), Harrington class III or IV acetabula (P < 0.01), and patients with a performance status ≥3 at hospitalization (P = 0.00). Open reconstruction was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.3; 95% CI, 1.4-50.6; P = 0.02) and performance status (aOR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.7-71.0; P = 0.01) at discharge and a restoration of ambulation (aOR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.9-29.8; P < 0.01) at final follow-up.

Conclusions

In patients with pathologic acetabular fracture due to osseous metastatic disease, functional improvements in pain, performance status, and ambulation were observed following open acetabular reconstruction in carefully selected patients, with no impact on survival, while noninferior improvements were observed in patients receiving nonoperative management when considering their larger clinical context.

Level of evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

How has the field of metastatic breast cancer in bones evolved over the past 22 years?

Background

Although knowledge on metastatic breast cancer in bones (MBCB) has increased rapidly over the past 22 years, a comprehensive and objective bibliometric analysis is still lacking.

Materials and methods

We used R, VOSviewer, and Citespace software to conduct a bibliometric analysis of 5,497 papers on MBCB from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) using author, institution, country/region, citation, and keyword indicators.

Results

A general strong sense of scholarly collaboration was noted in the MBCB field at the author, research institution, and country/region levels. We discovered some outstanding authors and highly productive institutions, but with less collaboration with other academic groups. Unbalanced and uncoordinated developments were observed among countries/regions in the field of MBCB research. We also found that by using various indicators and applying different analysis methods to them, we were able to broadly identify primary clinical practices, relevant clinical experiments, and directions for bioinformatics regarding MBCB, changes over the past 22 years, and current challenges in the field. The development of knowledge on MBCB is progressing greatly; however, MBCB is still incurable.

Conclusion

This study is the first to use bibliometrics to provide an overall analysis of the scientific output of MBCB studies. Palliative therapies for MBCB are mostly in a mature state. However, research on the molecular mechanisms and immune response to tumors related to the development of treatments to cure MBCB remains relatively immature. Therefore, further research should be undertaken in this area.

Pathophysiology and therapeutic advances in myeloma bone disease

Bone disease is the most common complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and it may lead to skeletal-related events (SREs) such as bone pain, pathological fractures, and spinal cord compression, which impair a patients' quality of life and survival. The pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease (MBD) involves disruption of bone reconstitution balance including excessive activation of osteoclasts, inhibition of osteoblasts, and participation of osteocytes and bone marrow stromal cells. Various factors, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG), dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), sclerostin, and activin-A, are involved in the development of MBD. Bisphosphonates and the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab are currently the main treatment options for MBD, delaying the onset of SREs. Denosumab is preferred in patients with MM and renal dysfunction. Although effective drugs have been approved, antimyeloma therapy is the most important method for controlling bone disease.

Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Biologic and Clinical Implications

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells localized within the bone marrow. Bone disease with associated osteolytic lesions is a hallmark of MM and develops in the majority of MM patients. Approximately half of patients with bone disease will experience skeletal-related events (SREs), such as spinal cord compression and pathologic fractures, which increase the risk of mortality by 20–40%. At the cellular level, bone disease results from a tumor-cell-driven imbalance between osteoclast bone resorption and osteoblast bone formation, thereby creating a favorable cellular environment for bone resorption. The use of osteoclast inhibitory therapies with bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, have been shown to delay and lower the risk of SREs, as well as the need for surgery or radiation therapy to treat severe bone complications. This review outlines our current understanding of the molecular underpinnings of bone disease, available therapeutic options, and highlights recent advances in the management of MM-related bone disease.

American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update

Strategies for management of patients with, or at risk for, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) - formerly referred to as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ)-were set forth in the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) position papers in 2007, 2009 and 2014. The position papers were developed by a committee appointed by the AAOMS Board of Trustees and comprising clinicians with extensive experience in caring for these patients, as well as clinical and basic science researchers. The knowledge base and experience in addressing MRONJ continues to evolve and expand, necessitating modifications and refinements to the previous position papers. Three members of the AAOMS Committee on Oral, Head, and Neck Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery (COHNORS) and three authors of the 2014 position paper were appointed to serve as a working group to analyze the current literature and revise the guidance as indicated to reflect current knowledge in this field. This update contains revisions to diagnosis and management strategies and highlights the current research status. AAOMS maintains that it is vitally important for this information to be disseminated to other relevant healthcare professionals and organizations.

Oligometastatic Disease in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Update

Simple Summary

Approximately 7–50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop oligometastases, which are new tumors found in another part of the body, arising from cancer cells of the original tumor that have travelled through the body. In recent years, these patients have been increasingly regarded as a distinct group that could benefit from treatment that intends to cure the disease, rather than palliative care, to achieve a better clinical outcome. Various treatment procedures have been developed for treating NSCLC patients with different oligometastatic sites. In addition, the newly proposed uniform definition for oligometastases as well as ongoing trials may lead to increased appropriate patient selection and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The aim of this review article is to summarize the latest evidence regarding optimal management strategies for NSCLC patients with oligometastases.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct entity that is different from localized and disseminated diseases. The definition of oligometastatic NSCLC varies across studies in past decades owing to the use of different imaging modalities; however, a uniform definition of oligometastatic NSCLC has been proposed, and this may facilitate trial design and evaluation of certain interventions. Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC are candidates for curative-intent management, in which local ablative treatment, such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend that local therapy for thoracic and metastatic lesions should be considered for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC with stable disease after systemic therapy, optimal management strategies for different oligometastatic sites have not been established. Additionally, the development of personalized therapies for individual patients with oligometastatic NSCLC to improve their quality of life and overall survival should also be addressed. Here, we review relevant articles on the management of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and categorize the disease according to the site of metastases. Ongoing trials are also summarized to determine future directions and expectations for new treatment modalities to improve patient management.

Special Considerations for Supportive Care and Management of Complications in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a progressive and incurable hematologic malignancy. It is predominantly a disease of older individuals, with a third of these patients considered to be elderly. In recent years, there has been a focus and emphasis on identifying and stratifying patients based on their functional status and frailty. There are several hallmark complications of the disease-hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone pain-along with thromboembolism and compromised immunity that are common in patients with multiple myeloma. Due to the wide range of patient ages and functional status, there are, accordingly, different considerations for management of the above complications based on numerous factors, including frailty status. This review focuses on considerations and management of common complications of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. These include renal failure, skeletal complications, anemia, thromboembolism, and infectious complications.

The role of bone-modifying agents in myeloma bone disease

Bone disease is common in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), which manifests as bone pain and skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Myeloma bone disease (MBD) can adversely affect the quality of life of patients and have negative effects on morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis of MBD is complex, and several factors are involved in the dysregulation of bone metabolism and uncoupling of bone remodeling, which result in net bone loss and devastating SREs. Broadly speaking, elevated osteoclast activity, suppressed osteoblast activity, and an aberrant marrow microenvironment play a role in MBD. Interaction of MM cells with the main bone cell osteocytes also promote further bone destruction. This review focuses on the role of bone-modifying agents in the prevention and treatment of MBD. The mainstay of MBD prevention are antiresorptive agents, bisphosphonates and denosumab. However, these agents do not play a direct role in bone formation and repair of existing MBD. Newer agents with anabolic effects such as anti-sclerostin antibodies, parathyroid hormone, anti-Dickkopf-1 antibodies, and others have shown potential in repair of MBD lesions. With the development of several new agents, the treatment landscape of MBD is likely to evolve in the coming years. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Myeloma Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, characterized by overproduction of heavy- and light-chain monoclonal proteins (M-protein). These proteins are mainly found in the serum and/or urine. Reduction in normal gammaglobulins (immunoparesis) leads to an increased risk of infection. The primary site of origin is the bone marrow for nearly all patients affected by MM with disseminated marrow involvement in most cases. MM is known to involve bones and result in myeloma bone disease. Osteolytic lesions are seen in 80% of patients with MM which are complicated frequently by skeletal-related events (SRE) such as hypercalcemia, bone pain, pathological fractures, vertebral collapse, and spinal cord compression. These deteriorate the patient's quality of life and affect the overall survival of the patient. The underlying pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease involves uncoupling of the bone remodeling processes. Interaction of myeloma cells with the bone marrow microenvironment promotes the release of many biochemical markers including osteoclast activating factors and osteoblast inhibitory factors. Elevated levels of osteoclast activating factors such as RANK/RANKL/OPG, MIP-1-α., TNF-α, IL-3, IL-6, and IL-11 increase bone resorption by osteoclast stimulation, differentiation, and maturation, whereas osteoblast inhibitory factors such as the Wnt/DKK1 pathway, secreted frizzle related protein-2, and runt-related transcription factor 2 inhibit osteoblast differentiation and formation leading to decreased bone formation. These biochemical factors also help in development and utilization of appropriate anti-myeloma treatments in myeloma patients. This review article summarizes the pathophysiology and the recent developments of abnormal bone remodeling in MM, while reviewing various approved and potential treatments for myeloma bone disease.

Racial Disparities in Intravenous Bisphosphonate Use Among Older Patients With Multiple Myeloma Enrolled in Medicare

PURPOSE

Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates reduce the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, data describing racial differences in IV bisphosphonate utilization outside of clinical trial settings are limited. We evaluated population-level IV bisphosphonate initiation and discontinuation among patients of age ≥ 65 years with MM.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients of age ≥ 65 years diagnosed with first primary MM between 2001 and 2011. Patients were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database and followed through December 2013. Cumulative incidences of IV bisphosphonate initiation and time to discontinuation among users were compared between racial and ethnic groups. In Fine and Gray competing risk models, we estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and 95% CIs for initiation and discontinuation.

RESULTS

We included 14,231 eligible patients with MM (median age, 76 years; 52% male). Over a median follow-up of 23.1 months, 54% of patients received at least one IV bisphosphonate dose. Our final analytical sample included 10,456 non-Hispanic (NH) Whites, 2,267 NH Blacks, 548 Asian and Pacific islanders, and 815 Hispanic and Latino patients. A higher proportion of White patients (56.1%) newly received IV bisphosphonates after MM diagnosis compared with NH Blacks (45.4%). Compared with White patients, NH Black patients were less likely to initiate IV bisphosphonates (SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.79) and slightly more likely to discontinue treatment (SHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.19).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the patients with MM of age ≥ 65 years did not receive IV bisphosphonates, with significant delay among racial minority groups. These findings highlight the need for improvement of IV bisphosphonate uptake in patients with MM of age ≥ 65 years.

Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group

In this Policy Review, the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group updates its clinical practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. After assessing the available literature and grading recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method, experts from the working group recommend zoledronic acid as the preferred bone-targeted agent for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, with or without multiple myeloma-related bone disease. Once patients achieve a very good partial response or better, after receiving monthly zoledronic acid for at least 12 months, the treating physician can consider decreasing the frequency of or discontinuing zoledronic acid treatment. Denosumab can also be considered for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Denosumab might prolong progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have multiple myeloma-related bone disease and who are eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Denosumab discontinuation is challenging due to the rebound effect. The Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group also found cement augmentation to be effective for painful vertebral compression fractures. Radiotherapy is recommended for uncontrolled pain, impeding or symptomatic spinal cord compression, or pathological fractures. Surgery should be used for the prevention and restoration of long-bone pathological fractures, vertebral column instability, and spinal cord compression with bone fragments within the spinal route.

Use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma patients in Denmark, 2005-2015

PURPOSE

To describe use of bisphosphonates in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in Denmark.

METHODS

Using data from the Danish National Multiple Myeloma Registry, we conducted a population-based cohort study. Among patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma from 2005 to 2015, we examined use of bisphosphonates at first- and at progression/second-line anti-myeloma treatment overall, by patient characteristics, and myeloma complications.

RESULTS

Of 2947 patients starting first-line anti-myeloma treatment, 2207 patients (74.9%) received bisphosphonates. During a median follow-up of 27.6 (quartiles, 10.6-52.5) months, disease progression post-first-line treatment was recorded in 1546 patients, of whom 1065 (68.9%) were treated with bisphosphonates. Altogether, 80.9% of patients with and 37.6% of patients without myeloma bone disease were treated with bisphosphonates at first line and 73.0% and 42.7%, respectively, at progression/second line. Moreover, the proportion of patients treated with bisphosphonates decreased with increasing severity of renal impairment at first and at progression/second-line treatment.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients treated with bisphosphonates as part of first- and second-line anti-myeloma treatment increased with presence of myeloma bone disease and decreased by presence and severity of renal impairment. Overall, 25% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients had no record of bisphosphonate treatment, potentially indicating an unmet need.

Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow, leading to bone destruction and marrow failure. This manuscript discusses the management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma, smoldering multiple myeloma, and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Controversies in the use of new bone-modifying therapies in multiple myeloma

Bone-modifying therapies are essential in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid is preferred over other bisphosphonates due to its superiority in reducing the incidence of skeletal-related events and improving survival. The anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κΒ ligand (RANKL)-targeted agent denosumab has shown its non-inferiority compared to bisphosphonates in preventing skeletal-related events among newly diagnosed patients with myeloma bone disease. Denosumab may confer a survival benefit in patients eligible for autologous transplantation. Denosumab may present a safer profile for patients with renal impairment. Discontinuation of bone-directed therapies can be considered for patients with deep responses and after an adequate time period on treatment; however, a rebound effect may become evident especially in the case of denosumab. Three-monthly infusions of zoledronic acid or at-home denosumab administration should be considered during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Measures to prevent hypocalcaemia, renal toxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw are important for all bone-modifying agents.

Bone metastases

Bone is the most frequent site for metastasis for many cancers, notably for tumours originating in the breast and the prostate. Tumour cells can escape from the primary tumour site and colonize the bone microenvironment. Within the bone, these disseminated tumour cells, as well as those arising in the context of multiple myeloma, may assume a state of dormancy, remaining quiescent for years before resuming proliferation and causing overt metastasis, which causes bone destruction via activation of osteoclast-mediated osteolysis. This structural damage can lead to considerable morbidity, including pain, fractures and impaired quality of life. Although treatment of bone metastases and myeloma bone disease is rarely curative, disease control is often possible for many years through the use of systemic anticancer treatments on a background of multidisciplinary supportive care. This care should include bone-targeted agents to inhibit tumour-associated osteolysis and prevent skeletal morbidity as well as use of appropriate local treatments such as radiation therapy, orthopaedic surgery and specialist palliative care to minimize the impact of metastatic bone disease on physical functioning. In this Primer, we provide an overview of the clinical features, the pathophysiology and the specific treatment approaches to prevent and treat bone metastases from solid tumours as well as myeloma bone disease.

Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Pathologic Humeral Shaft Fractures

The goal of this study was to report the clinical outcomes of pathologic humeral shaft fractures treated with reamed or unreamed intramedullary nail fixation in an era of longer patient survival. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent intramedullary nail fixation performed by a single surgeon for pathologic humeral shaft fractures at a Level I trauma center from 2009 to 2017. Of the 25 patients who were identified, 9 were excluded. Groups were categorized according to whether they underwent reamed or unreamed fixation, and they were evaluated for evidence of union, complications, and reoperation. Of the patients, 11 underwent an unreamed procedure and 5 underwent a reamed procedure. Mean length of follow-up was 51.5 weeks. Of the patients who participated, 12 (75%) showed evidence of union and 2 patients (12.5%) showed evidence of nonunion, with no statistical difference between the groups. Five patients (31.3%) had complications. One nonunion occurred in the reamed group and did not require reoperation. In the unreamed group, complications consisted of 1 delayed union, 1 nonunion treated with revision intramedullary nail fixation, and 2 cases of disease progression that required reoperation. Intramedullary nail fixation of pathologic humeral shaft fractures achieves rates of union parallel to those seen with fixation in a healthy population. The length of follow-up in the current study was longer than the life expectancy reported by previous authors, which can be attributed to improvements in the treatment of cancer. The current authors argue that unreamed fixation is the optimal technique because it yields similar outcomes to a reamed approach and is faster and potentially safer. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e389-e398.].

What is the relationship between bone turnover markers and skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and in patients with multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Introduction

As a result of the negative impact of bone metastases on patient quality of life, it is important to identify patients at increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). Biochemical markers produced by osteoblasts and osteoclasts may provide an early indicator of treatment response to antiresorptive therapy. We aimed to explore the relationship between change in the urinary bone turnover marker cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (uNTX) at the earliest time of steady state and risk of SREs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of eight bibliographic databases and two trial registries was conducted (June 2017). We included randomized controlled trials of adults (≥18 years old) with bone metastases from solid tumors (including breast, lung, prostate) or bone lesions from multiple myeloma that compared denosumab or bisphosphonate(s) with each other or a placebo. Meta-analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between uNTX and SREs. The primary outcomes were based on uNTX at week 13 and SREs in those studies.

Results

Seventeen studies (12,130 patients) were included. The analysis results indicated a positive association between uNTX reduction, measured by the between-group difference of the natural logarithm of the ratio between uNTX at week 13 and baseline, and SRE risk reduction, measured by the natural logarithm of the hazard ratio (HR) for time to first SRE between the two groups (uNTX effect on SRE risk, defined as SRE HR increase corresponding to one unit smaller in the magnitude of uNTX reduction: 0.3560, 95% confidence interval 0.0249-0.6871; P = .0390, R² = 0.7360). Results were similar for studies that reported change in uNTX from baseline to week 13 and to later than week 13. The limitation of this review is that it depends on how comprehensive study data were that could be included in the meta-regression.

Conclusions

Our findings support a positive relationship between reduction of bone turnover markers at the earliest time of steady state and reduction in longer-term risk of SREs.

Perspectives on Spinal Precautions in Patients Who Have Cancer and Spinal Metastasis

Bones are the third most common site for cancer metastases, and the axial skeleton is the most frequent skeletal location. In a postmortem study, bone metastases were reported in 70% of breast and prostate cancer patients. Bone metastases from breast, lung, prostate, thyroid, and kidney cancers account for 80% of all bone metastases. Bone lesions exist in 60% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. With increasing numbers of people who have survived cancer, many patients with cancer and axial skeletal bony metastases will be seen by physical and occupational therapists. Guidelines are lacking on how to perform physical examinations and provide exercise programs for these patients without compromising the diseased spine. In this article, we discuss the available evidence for similar spinal conditions, the biomechanics of spinal load, and changes associated with posture and weight load. We provide recommendations on how to assess a patient's strength, how to strengthen without compromising the diseased spine, and how to teach patients to use correct body mechanics during mobility and activities of daily living.

Prevention Of Skeletal Related Events In Multiple Myeloma: Focus On The RANK-L Pathway In The Treatment Of Multiple Myeloma

More than 90% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have osteolytic bone lesions which increase the risk of skeletal-related events (SRE). The cytokine milieu in the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) of MM plays a key role in myeloma bone disease by impairing the balance between osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis. This is orchestrated by the malignant plasma cell (MPC) with the ultimate outcome of MPC proliferation and survival at the expense of excess osteoclast activation resulting in osteolytic bone lesions. Prevention of SRE is currently accomplished by the inhibition of osteoclasts. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are pyrophosphate analogues that cause apoptosis of osteoclasts and have been proven to prevent and delay SRE. Denosumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-ĸB ligand (RANKL), a key molecule in the BMME crucial for osteoclastogenesis, is also approved for the prevention of SRE in MM. The addition of BPs and denosumab to standard MM treatment affords a survival benefit for patients with MM. Specifically, the addition of denosumab to standard MM treatments results in superior PFS compared to BPs, highlighting the key role of the RANKL pathway in MM. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of myeloma bone disease as well as on the importance of targeting the RANK-L pathway for the treatment of MM and prevention of SRE.

Use of bone-modifying agents and clinical outcomes in older adults with multiple myeloma

Background

Guidelines recommend bone‐modifying agents (BMAs) for all patients initiating treatment for myeloma. We examined adherence to this recommendation, and BMA effectiveness in the era of bortezomib/lenalidomide‐based therapy among Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods

From the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare registry, we selected beneficiaries receiving anti‐myeloma chemotherapy in 2007‐2013. We matched BMA recipients (within 90 days of first chemotherapy) to nonrecipients using a propensity score, balancing patient‐, disease‐, and therapy‐related confounders. Cumulative incidence of skeletal‐related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS) was compared in proportional hazard models accounting for competing risks and immortal‐time bias.

Results

Among 4611 patients with median age of 76 years, 51% received BMA. Bone‐modifying agents use remained steady over time (P = .87) and was significantly less frequent for patients who were older, with comorbidities, without prior SRE, and those treated without bortezomib or lenalidomide. In a propensity score‐matched cohort, BMA recipients experienced a lower incidence of SRE (11.0% vs 14.6% at 3 years; subhazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.89) and better OS (53.3% vs 47.8% at 3 years; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77‐0.95). The results were consistent in the subgroup (76%) treated with bortezomib and/or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was 3.2% at 3 years.

Conclusions

In this observational study, the observed benefits of early BMA administration among patients treated with contemporary anti‐myeloma regimens were similar to historical clinical trials. Frequent omission of BMA highlights a remediable deficiency in the quality of supportive care, and suggests that timely administration may be a useful indicator of quality care in myeloma.

The evolution and understanding of skeletal complication endpoints in clinical trials of tumors with metastasis to the bone

Bone metastases are a frequent complication of solid tumors, leading to significant skeletal sequelae that negatively impact quality of life and survival. Prevention and management of skeletal-related complications are critical treatment goals in oncology. Endpoints used in clinical trials to evaluate skeletal-related complications have evolved. In contrast to single measures of bone health, contemporary clinical trial endpoints reflect composite measures of skeletal-related complications, and increasingly also survival. In addition, key symptomatic components, which are more reflective of quality of life and the patient experience, are being incorporated. Given the evolution and resulting diversity of the endpoints being used in pivotal trials, it is becoming increasingly relevant to clarify the utility and the potential clinical impact of these measures not only within the context of trials but also in the real-world setting. Here, we describe the development and evolution of skeletal endpoints used in trials, and discuss their clinical relevance.

FRAX is a robust predictor of baseline vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma patients

FRAX is a commonly used tool to evaluate patient fracture risk based on individual patient models that integrate the risks associated with clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck. Retrospectively, factors identified by the FRAX scoring algorithm were used to predict the risk for vertebral compression fractures at baseline in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The data were derived from myeloma patients enrolled in Total Therapy Protocols (TT4 & TT5) between 8/2008 and 9/2017. FRAX scores were calculated and baseline PET and MRI imaging obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses determined the association between FRAX components and the existence of vertebral compression fractures, both pathologic and osteoporotic. The patient population had a median age of 61 years (43-76), 37% female, and 87% white. The median major osteoporotic score (MOS) and Hip fracture scores (HFS) for TT4 patients (low-risk myeloma) were 5.6 and 0.5, respectively, while median MOS and HFS for TT5 (high risk myeloma) patients were 6.2 and 0.7, respectively. The odds ratio for fracture at diagnosis in patients with elevated MOS (>2), and HFS (>4.5) was significant OR (1.48, 95% confidence interval (1.35,1.62)) and OR (1.61, 95% confidence interval (1.42, 1.81)), respectively. In sum, an elevated baseline FRAX score was highly predictive of baseline vertebral fractures in MM patients at presentation. In addition, patients with higher FRAX scores had significantly shorter survival in the low-risk (TT4) group but this survival effect was not seen in the high-risk (TT5) group. These findings suggest that FRAX assessment of baseline fracture risk is beneficial in MM patients to identify an individual patients' risk of vertebral fracture.

Use of Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Background: Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and, in some studies, improved survival. Since 2011, bisphosphonate use has been recommended by NCCN for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy independent of the presence of bone disease. This study investigated their use after these guidelines were established. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥65 years in the SEER-Medicare database with newly diagnosed MM between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, who received antineoplastic therapy, had ≥6 months of follow-up, and did not receive prior bisphosphonates. Presence of SREs at diagnosis was identified, including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone, or surgery to bone. Use of bisphosphonates was defined as having ≥1 claim for an intravenous or oral bisphosphonate within 6 months after the start of antineoplastic therapy. We used multivariable modeling to compare users with nonusers, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. We compared overall survival between users and nonusers using proportional hazards analysis. Results: Of 1,309 patients identified, 720 (55%) used a bisphosphonate. Factors associated with use included SRE at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; 95% CI, 1.98-3.40), hypercalcemia (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41), and use of proteasome inhibitor + immunomodulatory imide therapy (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.39). Chronic kidney disease (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.66) was associated with decreased use. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88). Conclusions: Although bisphosphonate use is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy, 45% of patients in the United States did not receive this guideline-recommended care.

Role of the RANK/RANKL Pathway in Multiple Myeloma

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) and its ligand, RANKL, are expressed in a variety of tissues throughout the body; their primary role is in the regulation of bone remodeling and development of the immune system. Consistent with these functions, evidence exists for a role of RANK/RANKL in all stages of tumorigenesis, from cell proliferation and carcinogenesis to epithelial-mesenchymal transition to neoangiogenesis and intravasation to metastasis to bone resorption and tumor growth in bone. Results from current studies also point to a role of RANK/RANKL signaling in patients with multiple myeloma, who have increased serum levels of soluble RANKL and an imbalance in RANKL and osteoprotegerin. Current therapies for patients with multiple myeloma demonstrate that RANKL may be released by tumor cells or osteoprogenitor cells. This article will review currently available evidence supporting a role for RANK/RANKL signaling in tumorigenesis, with a focus on patients with multiple myeloma.

Patterns of bisphosphonate treatment among patients with multiple myeloma treated at oncology clinics across the USA: observations from real-world data

PURPOSE

Current guidelines recommend that intravenous bisphosphonates be initiated in all patients with multiple myeloma for management of bone disease. The objective of this study was to describe real-world bisphosphonate treatment patterns.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using oncology electronic health record (EHR) data contained in Amgen's Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database, generated by Flatiron Health (New York, NY), representing over 1.5 million US oncology patients. Patients were newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma between January 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016. Timing of bisphosphonate administration, frequency, schedule, changes in dosing schedule, and discontinuations were calculated. Bisphosphonate treatment relative to renal function and anti-multiple myeloma therapy regimens were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11,112 patients were enrolled in the study with a median follow-up of 687 days. Sixty-three percent received ≥ 1 bisphosphonate administration, primarily every 4 weeks (67.7%). Mean time from diagnosis to bisphosphonate administration was 106 days (median, 29). Most patients (58.2%) initiated treatment in first year after diagnosis and about half (51.9%) either discontinued or changed dosing. Patients with poorer renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stage at baseline were less likely to receive bisphosphonates (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: 24 vs 72%) and more likely to have delayed initiation of bisphosphonate treatment from diagnosis (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: median 70 vs 25 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data from US oncology practices indicate that many patients with multiple myeloma may not receive optimal therapy for bone disease, particularly those with renal impairment.

Bisphosphonate guidelines for treatment and prevention of myeloma bone disease

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy characterised by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. More than 80% of patients with MM display evidence of myeloma bone disease (MBD), characterised by the formation of osteolytic lesions throughout the axial and appendicular skeleton. MBD significantly increases the risk of skeletal-related events such as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia. MBD is the result of MM plasma cells-mediated activation of osteoclast activity and suppression of osteoblast activity. Bisphosphonates (BP), pyrophosphate analogues with high bone affinity, are the only pharmacological agents currently recommended for the treatment and prevention of MBD and remain the standard of care. Pamidronate and zoledronic acid are the most commonly used BP to treat MBD. Although generally safe, frequent high doses of BP are associated with adverse events such as renal toxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw. As such, optimal duration and dosing of BP therapy is required in order to minimise BP-associated adverse events. The following guidelines provide currently available evidence for the adoption of a tailored approach when using BP for the management of MBD.

Bisphosphonates in Oncology: Physiopathologic Bases and Clinical Activity

Osteoclastic activation is the ultimate way of bone resorption in neoplasia, induced by the combined effects of tumor-secreted humoral factors (especially parathyroid hormone-related peptides) and osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction. Bisphosphonates inhibit the osteoclast activity and reduce bone resorption and are a valuable supportive measure for bone disease of neoplasms. Experimental models also suggest an activity of bisphosphonates against cancer cells. Controlled studies, especially in advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma, indicate different effectiveness against the distinct skeletal-related events. Intravenous clodronate and, especially, pamidronate and zoledronate are the first-choice drugs for hypercalcemia, and they play a significant role in reducing metastatic bone pain. Their prolonged use delays, without hampering, the progression of bone disease, including the appearance of osteolysis and the occurrence of pathologic fractures. This effect is probably more valuable when bisphosphonates are administered early in the course of the disease. The evidence that adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival needs to be confirmed in ongoing studies. Although poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, oral bisphosphonates are effective in preventing and treating cancer-induced osteoporosis in long-living patients with operable breast cancer. At present, there is little hope that newer bisphosphonates are more effective than those currently used.

Evaluation of the Relevance of Surgery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Harboring Symptomatic Spinal Involvement: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma spinal involvement can lead to bone fractures and neurologic impairment that can severely alter quality of life. The role of surgery is controversial, given its high morbidity, and the lack of evidence. We hereby aim to evaluate efficacy and safety of surgery in the management of symptomatic spinal lesions in patients with multiple myeloma.

METHODS

We included all patients operated on for a myeloma-related spinal lesion in our institution between 2007 and 2015. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected as well as hematologic profiles. We retrospectively assessed the surgical success of the procedures, if at 3 months the patient fulfilled the following 4 criteria: pain relief, ability to walk, spinal stability, and no relevant morbidity.

RESULTS

Thirty-six men and 19 women, with a median age of 62 years, were included. Seventeen patients underwent an emergency intervention, whereas 38 patients underwent elective surgery. At 3 months, 88.2% and 96.1%, respectively, of patients experienced pain relief and were able to walk. Spinal stability was considered satisfactory for 94.1% of patients. We reported 8 major complications in 8 patients. Altogether, 34 patients (61.8%) fulfilled all criteria for surgical success. An International Staging System score of 1 and the absence of previous chemotherapy were significantly associated with surgical success.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of myeloma-related spine lesions requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgery rapidly provides both decompression and stabilization. Using a strict patient-specific evaluation, we reported rewarding functional results, with acceptable morbidity. Surgery for multiple myeloma vertebral lesions seems to be a valuable option for carefully selected patients.

Biology and treatment of myeloma related bone disease

Myeloma bone disease (MBD) is the most common complication of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeleton-related events (SREs) such as severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, vertebral collapse, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression that cause significant morbidity and mortality. It is due to an increased activity of osteoclasts coupled to the suppressed bone formation by osteoblasts. Novel molecules and pathways that are implicated in osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition have recently been described, including the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand/osteoprotegerin pathway, activin-A and the wingless-type signaling inhibitors, dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) and sclerostin. These molecules interfere with tumor growth and survival, providing possible targets for the development of novel drugs for the management of lytic disease in myeloma but also for the treatment of MM itself. Currently, bisphosphonates are the mainstay of the treatment of myeloma bone disease although several novel agents such as denosumab and sotatercept appear promising. This review focuses on recent advances in MBD pathophysiology and treatment, in addition to the established therapeutic guidelines.

New agents in the Treatment of Myeloma Bone Disease

Patients with multiple myeloma develop a devastating bone disease driven by the uncoupling of bone remodelling, excess osteoclastic bone resorption and diminished osteoblastic bone formation. The bone phenotype is typified by focal osteolytic lesions leading to pathological fractures, hypercalcaemia and other catastrophic bone events such as spinal cord compression. This causes bone pain, impaired functional status, decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Early in the disease, malignant plasma cells occupy a niche environment that encompasses their interaction with other key cellular components of the bone marrow microenvironment. Through these interactions, osteoclast-activating factors and osteoblast inhibitory factors are produced, which together uncouple the dynamic process of bone remodelling, leading to net bone loss and focal osteolytic lesions. Current management includes antiresorptive therapies, i.e. bisphosphonates, palliative support and orthopaedic interventions. Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of treatment for myeloma bone disease (MBD), but are only partially effective and do have some significant disadvantages; for example, they do not lead to the repair of existing bone destruction. Thus, newer agents to prevent bone destruction and also promote bone formation and repair existing lesions are warranted. This review summarises novel ways that MBD is being therapeutically targeted.

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are specific inhibitors of osteoclastic activity and are used in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While bisphosphonates are shown to be effective in reducing vertebral fractures and pain, their role in improving overall survival (OS) remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2010 and 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence related to benefits and harms associated with use of various types of bisphosphonates (aminobisphosphonates versus non-aminobisphosphonates) in the management of patients with MM. Our primary objective was to determine whether adding bisphosphonates to standard therapy in MM improves OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and decreases skeletal-related morbidity. Our secondary objectives were to determine the effects of bisphosphonates on pain, quality of life, incidence of hypercalcemia, incidence of bisphosphonate-related gastrointestinal toxicities, osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) and hypocalcemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase (September 2011 to July 2017) and the CENTRAL (2017, Issue 7) to identify all randomized controlled trial (RCT) in MM up to July 2017 using a combination of text and MeSH terms.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing bisphosphonates versus placebo/no treatment/bisphosphonates and observational studies or case reports examining bisphosphonate-related ONJ in patients with MM were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted the data. Data were pooled and reported as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) using a random-effects model. We used meta-regression to explore statistical heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis using Bayesian approach was conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we included four new studies (601 participants), resulting in a total of 24 included studies.Twenty RCTs compared bisphosphonates with either placebo or no treatment and four RCTs involved another bisphosphonate as a comparator. The 24 included RCTs enrolled 7293 participants. Pooled results showed that there was moderate-quality evidence of a reduction in mortality with on OS from 41% to 31%, but the confidence interval is consistent with a larger reduction and small increase in mortality compared with placebo or no treatment (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.07; 14 studies; 2706 participants). There was substantial heterogeneity among the included RCTs (I2 = 65%) for OS. To explain this heterogeneity we performed a meta-regression assessing the relationship between bisphosphonate potency and improvement in OS, which found an OS benefit with zoledronate but limited evidence of an effect on PFS. This provided a further rationale for performing a network meta-analyses of the various types of bisphosphonates that were not compared head-to-head in RCTs. Results from network meta-analyses showed evidence of a benefit for OS with zoledronate compared with etidronate (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87) and placebo (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91). However, there was no evidence for a difference between zoledronate and other bisphosphonates.The effect of bisphosphonates on disease progression (PFS) is uncertain. Based on the HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00; seven studies; 908 participants), 47% participants would experience disease progression without treatment compared with between 30% and 47% with bisphosphonates (low-quality evidence). There is probably a similar risk of non-vertebral fractures between treatment groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.56; six studies; 1389 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Pooled analysis demonstrated evidence for a difference favoring bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment on prevention of pathological vertebral fractures (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.89; seven studies; 1116 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and skeletal-related events (SREs) (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88; 10 studies; 2141 participants; moderate-quality evidence). The evidence for less pain with bisphosphonates was of very low quality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95; eight studies; 1281 participants).Bisphosphonates may increase ONJ compared with placebo but the confidence interval is very wide (RR 4.61, 95% CI 0.99 to 21.35; P = 0.05; six studies; 1284 participants; low-quality evidence). The results from the network meta-analysis did not show any evidence for a difference in the incidence of ONJ (eight RCTs, 3746 participants) between bisphosphonates. Data from nine observational studies (1400 participants) reported an incidence of 5% to 51% with combination of pamidronate and zoledronate, 3% to 11% with zoledronate alone, and 0% to 18% with pamidronate alone.The pooled results showed no evidence for a difference in increase in frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms with the use of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.59; seven studies; 1829 participants; low-quality evidence).The pooled results showed no evidence for a difference in increase in frequency of hypocalcemia with the use of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.19, 95% CI 0.49 to 9.74; three studies; 1090 participants; low-quality evidence). The results from network meta-analysis did not show any evidence for differences in the incidence of hypocalcemia, renal dysfunction and gastrointestinal toxicity between the bisphosphonates used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Use of bisphosphonates in participants with MM reduces pathological vertebral fractures, SREs and pain. Bisphosphonates were associated with an increased risk of developing ONJ. For every 1000 participants treated with bisphosphonates, about one patient will suffer from the ONJ. We found no evidence of superiority of any specific aminobisphosphonate (zoledronate, pamidronate or ibandronate) or non-aminobisphosphonate (etidronate or clodronate) for any outcome. However, zoledronate was found to be better than placebo and first-generation bisposphonate (etidronate) in pooled direct and indirect analyses for improving OS and other outcomes such as vertebral fractures. Direct head-to-head trials of the second-generation bisphosphonates are needed to settle the issue if zoledronate is truly the most efficacious bisphosphonate currently used in practice.

The skeletal-related events of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The meta-analysis was used to evaluate the skeletal-related events (SREs) and efficacy of denosumab versus zoledronic acid (ZA) in patients with bone metastases.

Methods

The data of this meta-analysis study were searched from PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science with Conference Proceedings, Elsevier and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases till August 2017. Two independent reviewers reviewed the reference lists of relevant articles. The fixed-effects model and random-effects model were used to summarize relative estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to the heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 4050 patients were identified in this meta-analysis study. The pooled analysis showed that denosumab could significantly reduce SREs, series SREs [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74–0.95, I² = 0%, P = 0.008] in patients with bone metastases as compared with ZA. Similar results of spinal cord compression SRE and surgery to bone SRE were obtained with (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70–1.01, I² = 0%, P = 0.07) and (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78–1.08, I² = 0%, P = 0.28) separately, radiation to bone SRE (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46–1.10, I² = 11%, P = 0.13) and pathological fracture SRE (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35–1.73, I² = 25%, P = 0.54) showed similar results, there were no significant difference between denosumab and ZA in patients with bone metastases.

Conclusion

Denosumab was more effective than ZA in reducing the incidence of SRE in patients with bone metastases.

Bone marrow micro-environment is a crucial player for myelomagenesis and disease progression

Despite the advent of many therapeutic agents, such as bortezomib and lenalidomide that have significantly improved the overall survival, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Failure to cure is multifactorial and can be attributed to the underlying genetic heterogeneity of the cancer and to the surrounding micro-environment. Understanding the mutual interaction between myeloma cells and micro-environment may lead to the development of novel treatment strategies able to eradicate this disease. In this review we discuss the principal molecules involved in the micro-environment network in multiple myeloma and the currently available therapies targeting them.

Economic burden of multiple myeloma among patients in successive lines of therapy in the United States

This study characterized the costs of multiple myeloma (MM) during first-line (1L), second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment from the US payer perspective. Patients with ≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient claims with a primary MM diagnosis and 12 months continuous enrollment post index were identified in a retrospective claims database between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2013. A cost per-patient per-month (PPPM) metric was used to calculate total all-cause and anti-MM pharmacy costs in 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment. Of 5704 patients included, 3626 initiated 1L treatment, 1797 initiated 2L and 817 initiated 3L. Average total all-cause PPPM costs were $22,527 in 1L, $35,266 in 2L and $47,417 in 3L. Anti-MM pharmacy costs represented 22%, 29% and 29% of total all-cause costs PPPM in 1L, 2L and 3L, respectively. Study results suggest that delaying 2L and/or 3L treatment initiation may result in lower treatment costs for patients with MM.

Long-term administration of bisphosphonate to reduce local recurrence of sacral giant cell tumor after nerve-sparing surgery

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of long-term bisphosphonate treatment on reducing local recurrence of sacral giant cell tumors (GCTs) after nerve-sparing surgery. METHODS Thirty-five consecutive patients with sacral GCTs who received treatment in Shanghai Changzheng Hospital between January 2000 and December 2010 were included in this study. Between January 2007 and December 2010, 19 patients received bisphosphonates following nerve-sparing surgery. Before January 2007, 16 patients received nerve-sparing surgery alone, and these cases were included as the control group. The difference in clinical data between the groups was compared by Student's t-test and 2-tailed chi-square or Fisher's exact test. The postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the groups by log-rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS All of the patients had relatively good nerve function. The clinical data were homogeneous between the groups. The local recurrence rate was 10.53% (2 of 19) in the bisphosphonate treatment group and 43.75% (7 of 16) in the control group. The log-rank test showed that the 3-year RFS and 3-year OS in the bisphosphonate treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (RFS 89.5% vs 56.3%, p = 0.04; OS 100% vs 81.3%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The long-term use of bisphosphonates after nerve-sparing surgery is a viable option for the treatment of sacral GCTs. This approach could reduce local recurrences while preserving nerve function.

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to define symptomatic and radiographic outcomes following spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

METHODS

All patients with pathological diagnoses of myeloma undergoing spine SRS at a single institution were included. Patients with less than 1 month of follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of pain relief after spine SRS, while secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidences of radiographic failure and vertebral fracture. Pain scores before and after treatment were prospectively collected using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a validated questionnaire used to assess severity and impact of pain upon daily functions.

RESULTS

Fifty-six treatments (in 38 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Epidural disease was present in nearly all treatment sites (77%). Moreover, preexisting vertebral fracture (63%), thecal sac compression (55%), and neural foraminal involvement (48%) were common. Many treatment sites had undergone prior local therapy, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; 30%), surgery (23%), and kyphoplasty (21%). At the time of consultation for SRS, the worst, current, and average BPI pain scores at these treatment sites were 6, 4, and 4, respectively. The median prescription dose was 16 Gy in a single fraction. The median clinical follow-up duration after SRS was 26 months. The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of radiographic failure were 6% and 9%, respectively. Among painful treatment sites, 41% achieved pain relief adjusted for narcotic usage, with a median time to relief of 1.6 months. The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of adjusted pain progression were 13% and 15%, respectively. After SRS, 1-month and 3-month worst, current, and average BPI scores all significantly decreased (p < 0.01). Vertebral fracture occurred following 12 treatments (21%), with an 18% cumulative incidence of fracture at 6 and 12 months. Two patients (4%) developed pain flare following spine SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the largest series of myeloma lesions treated with spine SRS. A rapid and durable symptomatic response was observed, with a median time to pain relief of 1.6 months. This response was durable among 85% of patients at 12 months following treatment, with 91% local control. The efficacy and minimal toxicity of spine SRS is likely related to the delivery of ablative and conformal radiation doses to the target. SRS should be considered with doses of 14–16 Gy in a single fraction for patients with multiple myeloma and limited spinal disease, myelosuppression requiring “marrow-sparing” radiation therapy, or recurrent disease after EBRT.

A retrospective analysis to examine factors associated with mortality in Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

Population-based data on mortality and associated factors in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are limited. We examined the association between all-cause mortality and demographic and clinical characteristics in newly diagnosed MM patients treated with guideline-recommended chemotherapeutic agents.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis used Medicare 20% data to create a cohort of adult (aged ≥18 years) newly diagnosed MM patients who received chemotherapy 2008-2011 and had no MM diagnosis in the 12 months before the disease index date. Patients were followed from treatment initiation through the earliest of death, loss of insurance coverage, or study end (December 2011). Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and MM-related comorbid conditions (anemia, hypercalcemia, skeletal-related events) were identified in the 6 month pre-index-date period. All-cause mortality and associated factors were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

We identified 2419 newly diagnosed patients who received MM therapy during follow-up. Mean (SD) and median follow-up were 1.51 (1.0) and 1.37 years. Of the cohort, 55% were female, 78% white, and 92% aged ≥65 years. Pre-index, 54%, 9%, and 5% were diagnosed with anemia, hypercalcemia, and skeletal-related events. Overall, 942 (39%) patients died during follow-up. Factors associated with increased risk of death were older age (≥65 vs. 18-64 years; hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.99), higher comorbidity score (≥4 vs. 0; 1.78, 1.43-2.21), anemia (1.23, 1.06-1.42), and hypercalcemia (1.45, 1.19-1.76); female sex (0.86, 0.75-0.98) was associated with decreased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, male sex, high comorbidity burden, anemia, and hypercalcemia were risk factors for death in newly diagnosed Medicare MM patients. Study limitations included non-causal observational design, non-validated MM algorithm, potential treatment misclassification, and non-availability of prognostic factors including disease staging information, biomarkers, and other laboratory variables. Additional analyses are warranted to understand the relationship between treatments and death.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaws and Bisphosphonate Therapy

Bisphosphonates are a class of agents used to treat osteoporosis and malignant bone metastases. The efficacy of these agents in treating and preventing the significant skeletal complications associated with these conditions has had a major positive impact for patients and is responsible for their widespread use in medicine. Despite these benefits, osteonecrosis of the jaws has recently emerged as a significant complication in a subset of patients receiving these drugs. Based on a growing number of case reports and institutional reviews, bisphosphonate therapy may cause exposed and necrotic bone that is isolated to the jaw. This complication usually presents following simple dento-alveolar surgery, and can cause a significant adverse effect on the quality of life for most patients. The pathogenesis for this complication appears to be related to the profound inhibition of osteoclast function and bone remodeling.

Mechanism of Action, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, and Clinical Applications of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (nBPs) are bone-specific agents that inhibit farnesyl diphosphate synthase. nBPs’ strong affinity for bone, and not for other tissues, makes them potent inhibitors of bone resorption and bone remodeling activity, with limited potential for side-effects in non-skeletal tissues. Five nBPs are currently approved in the United States. The primary indications are for treatment of osteoporosis (alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate) and treatment/prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in multiple myeloma and breast and prostate cancer patients (ibandronate, pamidronate, and zoledronic acid). nBPs are the most efficacious drugs available for these diseases, reducing osteoporotic fracture risk by 50–60% in persons with low bone mass or prior osteoporotic fracture, and SREs by one-third in cancer patients. The absorbed nBP dose for cancer patients is from seven to ten times that in osteoporosis patients. nBPs are unique in that they first exert profound pharmacodynamic effects long after their blood levels reach zero. Current pharmacokinetic studies indicate that approximately half of any nBP dose reaches the skeleton, with an early half-life of ten days, and a terminal half-life of about ten years. Practical study design limitations and theoretical considerations suggest that both the half-life and the amount of nBP retained in the skeletons of patients on long-term nBP therapy are substantially overestimated by extrapolation directly from current pharmacokinetic data. In fact, the amount of nBP being released from skeletal tissues of long-term-treated patients, particularly in osteoporosis patients, becomes insufficient to maintain full pharmacodynamic efficacy relatively soon after dosing is interrupted.