Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous-oral versus intravenous-mesna regimen in lung cancer patients receiving ifosfamide

A Phase I Study of Prolonged Ambulatory Infusion of Ifosfamide with Oral Mesna

BACKGROUND

Oral mesna allows investigation of ifosfamide as a prolonged ambulatory infusion for dose-intense out-patient use.

METHODS

Cohorts of 3 patients received escalating doses of ifosfamide from 200 to 1,000 mg/m2/day as continuous ambulatory infusion with oral mesna at 30% of the ifosfamide dose every 6 h commencing 2 h prior to ifosfamide infusion as uroprotection on a 14-day schedule with cycles repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received a median of three cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities with cycle 1 were lethargy and hepatotoxicity at 1,000 mg/m2/14 days. Transient transaminase elevation was seen at all dose levels. The other grade 3 toxicities were single episodes of anaemia, granulocytopenia, nausea and hypotension. The best response was stable disease in a patient with thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory infusion of 600 mg/m2 ifosfamide with 180 mg/m2 oral mesna was considered suitable for phase II trials and delivers dose-intense out-patient therapy without urotoxicity.

Pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and its metabolite mesna in plasma and ascites: a case report

PURPOSE

BNP7787 (2',2'-dithio-bis-ethane sulfonate sodium) is a novel protector against cisplatin-induced toxicities. The pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and its metabolite mesna were investigated in plasma and ascites of a cancer patient. We also evaluated potential pharmacokinetic interactions between BNP7787 and cisplatin.

METHODS

BNP7787 and mesna were measured as mesna in deproteinized plasma and ascites using high-performance liquid chromatography with an electrochemical detector provided with a wall-jet gold electrode.

RESULTS

After the i.v. administration of 41 g/m(2) BNP7787, BNP7787 and mesna had a half-life of 1.5 and 3.4 h, respectively. The AUC( infinity ) of mesna was approximately 8% of the AUC( infinity ) of BNP7787. Coadministration of cisplatin did not appear to influence the plasma concentration-time curves of BNP7787 and mesna. In ascites, approximately 0.02% of the BNP7787 dose was present as mesna, whereas approximately 4% of the dose was present as BNP7787 at the time of the maximum concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the presence of ascites did not have a major impact on the pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and coadministration of cisplatin did not influence the pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and mesna.

Quantification of mesna and total mesna in kidney tissue by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

A sensitive and selective assay for the determination of mesna and total mesna in tissue was developed and validated. After a simple homogenization, extraction and deproteinization step, mesna could be measured immediately by HPLC with an electrochemical detector provided with a sensitive wall-jet gold electrode. Total mesna (i.e., free mesna and mesna present in mesna disulfides and mixed mesna disulfides) could be measured after pre-column reduction with sodium borohydride to free mesna. The lower limit of quantification of mesna and total mesna was for both compounds 10 nmol/g. The assays for mesna and total mesna in tissue were linear over the ranges of 10-3000 and 10-10000 nmol/g, respectively. The within-day and between-day precisions of both methods were better than 9%. The within-day and between-day accuracy of the mesna assay ranged from 103.7 to 113.6%, whereas the accuracies of the total mesna assay ranged from 97.8 to 106.7%. Mesna in an EDTA containing tissue homogenate or in deproteinized tissue homogenate stored at -80 degrees C was stable for at least 12 weeks. Total mesna was stable under all conditions measured. The developed assays will be applied for the determination of the distribution of mesna and total mesna in tissues of the rat after administration of mesna or BNP7787.

Kinetics of cisplatin binding to cellular DNA and modulations by thiol-blocking agents and thiol drugs

DNA platination by cisplatin (CDDP) was investigated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and ovarian cancer cells using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Plots showing the amount of platinum (Pt) bound to DNA versus the molar concentration of cisplatin in the incubation medium ([CDDP]) were nonlinear. For [CDDP] < about 5 microM, the amount of Pt bound to DNA increased slowly with added drug. However, for larger [CDDP], the slope of the plot increased significantly. To study the role of thiols in affecting cisplatin binding to DNA, cells were treated with N-ethylmaleimide, which modifies thiol groups, rendering them incapable of binding cisplatin. Analysis using high-pressure liquid chromatography showed that approximately 99% of cellular glutathione was modified by N-ethylmaleimide. A plot of the amount of Pt bound to DNA versus [CDDP] for thiol-blocked cells is linear, with a slope similar to that of unblocked cells at high [CDDP]. Neither S-2-(3 aminopropylamino)ethanethiol (WR-1065) nor mesna, when added at clinically achievable concentrations (i.e., < approximately 300 microM), affected DNA platination. However, DNA platination was totally abolished by millimolar concentrations of the drug thiols (approximately 1.25 mM WR-1065 or approximately 5 mM mesna). Thus, the data show that endogenous thiols intercept cellular cisplatin, but this mechanism is less important at high [CDDP]. Moreover, therapeutic concentrations of drug thiols do not significantly affect DNA platination. A simple model that reproduces the experimental results of the amount of cisplatin binding to DNA as a function of [CDDP], time, and thiol content is proposed. The model takes into account passage of cisplatin and thiols through the cell membrane, binding of cisplatin to cellular thiols, and platination of DNA.

Ifosfamide in the elderly: clinical considerations for a better drug management

The therapeutic strategy used for elderly affected by malignant neoplasms should take into account the common variables present in oncological patients, and the specific alteration of the elderly metabolism and their possible morbidity. Ifosfamide is an active drug for various tumors with elevated incidence in the elderly. We analyze the principle criteria in the selection of these patients and the alterations of metabolism which correlates to aging with their consequences on the pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide. Finally, we propose clinical guidelines to optimize the use of ifosfamide in elderly patients affected by malignant tumors.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants

PURPOSE

Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth