Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of eniluracil plus fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer

Treatment efficacy of low-dose 5-fluorouracil with ultrasound in mediating 5-fluorouracil-loaded microbubble cavitation in head and neck cancer

Over the past 50 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has played a critical role in the systemic chemotherapy of cancer patients. Bolus intravenous (IV) 5-FU infusion has been used due to the limitation of its extremely short half-life (10-15 min). This study used ultrasound (US) mediating 5-FU-loaded microbubbles (MBs) cavitation as a tool to increase local intratumoral 5-FU levels with a reduced dose of 5-FU (a single IV injection of 2.5 mg/kg instead of a single intraperitoneal injection of 25-200 mg/kg as used in previous studies in mice). The 5-FU-MBs were prepared with a 132 mg/mL albumin solution and a 0.30 mg/mL 5-FU solution. The diameters of the MBs and 5-FU-MBs were 1.24 ± 0.85 and 2.00 ± 0.53 µm (mean ± SEM), respectively, and the maximum loading efficiency of 5-FU on MBs was 19.04 ± 0.25%. In the in vitro study, the cell viabilities of 5-FU and 5-FU-MBs did not differ significantly, but compared with the 5-FU-MBs treatment-alone group, cell toxicity increased to 31% in the 5-FU-MBs + US group (p < 0.001). The biodistribution results indicated that the 5-FU levels of the tumors in small animals were significant higher for the 5-FU-MBs + US treatment than for either the 5-FU-MBs or 5-FU treatment with low 5-FU systemic treatment doses (2.5 mg/kg 5-FU IV). In small-animal treatment, 2.5 mg/kg 5-FU therapeutic IV doses injected into mice caused a more-significant reduction in tumor growth in the 5-FU-MBs + US group (65.9%) than in the control group after 34 days of treatment.

The past, present, and future of chemotherapy with a focus on individualization of drug dosing

While there have been rapid advances in developing new and more targeted drugs to treat cancer, much less progress has been made in individualizing dosing. Even though the introduction of immunotherapies such as CAR T-cells and checkpoint inhibitors, as well as personalized therapies that target specific mutations, have transformed clinical treatment of cancers, chemotherapy remains a mainstay in oncology. Chemotherapies are typically dosed on either a body surface area (BSA) or weight basis, which fails to account for pharmacokinetic differences between patients. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion rates can vary between patients, resulting in considerable differences in exposure to the active drugs. These differences result in suboptimal dosing, which can reduce efficacy and increase side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), genotype guided dosing, and chronomodulation have been developed to address this challenge; however, despite improving clinical outcomes, they are rarely implemented in clinical practice for chemotherapies. Thus, there is a need to develop interventions that allow for individualized drug dosing of chemotherapies, which can help maximize the number of patients that reach the most efficacious level of drug in the blood while mitigating the risks of underdosing or overdosing. In this review, we discuss the history of the development of chemotherapies, their mechanisms of action and how they are dosed. We discuss substantial intraindividual and interindividual variability in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics. We then propose potential engineering solutions that could enable individualized dosing of chemotherapies, such as closed-loop drug delivery systems and bioresponsive biomaterials.

Pharmacokinetic variables of medium molecular weight cross linked chitosan nanoparticles to enhance the bioavailability of 5-fluorouracil and reduce the acute oral toxicity

To prepare glutaraldehyde-based cross-linked medium molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles encapsulated with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), to overcome dosing frequency as well as reducing acute oral toxicity and poor bioavailability of the drug. Medium molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles (MMWCH-NPs) were prepared by reverse micelles method based on glutaraldehyde (GA) cross-linking and optimized by the process as well as formulation variables like a various drug to polymer ratio, cross-linker volumes, varying stirring speeds (rpm), different time of rotation/stirring, respectively and their effects on the mean particles size distribution and entrapment efficiency %EE and %LC of NPs. Characterization of formulations was done by FTIR studies, TEM, PXRD, TGA, Stability, and dissolution drug release studies were performed by dialysis bag technique at both pH (1.2 & 7.4) and acute oral toxicity studies in albino rabbits. The formulated nanoparticles showed a smooth morphology with smaller particle size distribution (230–550 nm), zeta potential (−15 to −18 mV) required to achieve enhanced permeation and retention effect (EPR), entrapment efficiency (%EE 12–59%). These NPs exhibited a controlled drug release profile with 84.36% of the drug over a period of 24 h. Drug release data were fitted to different kinetic models which predominantly followed Fickian diffusion mechanism (R² = 0.972–0.976, N = 0.326–0.256). The optimized formulation (5-FU6) was observed under DSC/TGA, TEM. PXRD curves, FTIR, which confirmed thermal stability, structural integrity, amorphous state, compatibility between drug and polymer of optimized (5-FU6) as well as reduced acute oral toxicity in albino rabbits. Cross-linked medium molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles are nontoxic, well-tolerated therefore could be the future candidate for therapeutic effects as novel drug delivery carrier for anticancer drug(s).

Oral drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer, with an estimated 1.36 million new cases and almost 700,000 deaths annually. Approximately 21% of patients with CRC have metastatic disease at diagnosis. The objective of this article is to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of oral drugs available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several such drugs have been developed, and fluoropyrimidines are the backbone of chemotherapy in this indication. They exert their antitumour activity by disrupting the synthesis and function of DNA and RNA. Oral fluoropyrimidines include prodrugs capecitabine, tegafur, eniluracil/5-fluorouracil, tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). Oral drugs offer several advantages over injectable formulations, including convenience, flexibility, avoidance of injection-related adverse events (AEs) and, in some circumstances, lower costs. However, oral drugs may not be suitable for patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or malabsorption, they may result in reduced treatment adherence and should not be co-administered with drugs that interfere with absorption or hepatic metabolism. Oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin, irinotecan or bevacizumab, are as effective as intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in first-line treatment of mCRC. Other oral fluoropyrimidines, such as FTD/TPI, are effective in patients with mCRC who are refractory, intolerant or ineligible for 5-FU. In addition, oral fluoropyrimidines are used in adjuvant treatment of mCRC. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in patients in whom several previous lines of therapy have failed. Frequent AEs associated with oral drugs used in the treatment of CRC include hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities.

Ex vivo and in vivo chemoprotective activity and potential mechanism of Martynoside against 5-fluorouracil-induced bone marrow cytotoxicity

Martynoside (MAR) is a bioactive glycoside of Rehmannia glutinosa, a traditional Chinese herb frequently prescribed for treating chemotherapy-induced pancytopenia. Despite its clinical usage in China for thousands of years, the mechanism of MAR's hematopoietic activity and its impact on chemotherapy-induced antitumor activity are still unclear. Here, we showed that MAR protected ex vivo bone marrow cells from 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced cell death and inflammation response by down-regulating the TNF signaling pathway, in which II1b was the most regulatory gene. Besides, using mouse models with melanoma and colon cancer, we further demonstrated that MAR had protective effects against 5-FU-induced myelosuppression in mice without compromising its antitumor activity. Our results showed that MAR increased the number of bone marrow nucleated cells (BMNCs) and the percentage of leukocyte and granulocytic populations in 5-FU-induced myelosuppressive mice, accompanied by an increase in numbers of circulating white blood cells and platelets. The transcriptome profile of BMNCs further showed that the mode of action of MAR might be associated with the increased survival of BMNCs and the improvement of the bone marrow microenvironment. In summary, we revealed the potential molecular mechanism of MAR to counteract 5-FU-induced bone marrow cytotoxicity both ex vivo and in vivo, and highlighted its potential clinical usage in cancer patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced multi-lineage myelosuppression.

Phase I study of DFP-11207, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine with reasonable AUC and low Cmax and improved tolerability, in patients with solid tumors

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-FU derivatives, such as capecitabine, UFT, and S-1, are the mainstay of chemotherapy treatment for gastrointestinal cancers, and other solid tumors. Compared with other cytotoxic chemotherapies, these drugs generally have a favorable safety profile, but hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities remain common. DFP-11207 is a novel oral cytotoxic agent that combines a 5-FU pro-drug with a reversible DPD inhibitor and a potent inhibitor of OPRT, resulting in enhanced pharmacological activity of 5-FU with decreased gastrointestinal and myelosuppressive toxicities. In this Phase I study (NCT02171221), DFP-11207 was administered orally daily, in doses escalating from 40 mg/m²/day to 400 mg/m²/day in patients with esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic or gallbladder cancer (n = 23). It was determined that DFP-11207 at the dose of 330 mg/m²/day administered every 12 hours was well-tolerated with mild myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal toxicities. The pharmacokinetic analysis determined that the 5-FU levels were in the therapeutic range at this dose. In addition, fasted or fed states had no influence on the 5-FU levels (patients serving as their own controls). Among 21 efficacy evaluable patients, 7 patients had stable disease (33.3%), of which two had prolonged stable disease of >6 months duration. DFP-11207 can be explored as monotherapy or easily substitute 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1 in combination regimens.

Combinatorial therapeutic approach for treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the common type of cancer in humans. A combinatorial approach has been done by using paclitaxel (PTX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and ascorbic acid (AA) loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for its treatment. SLN were made by high-speed homogenization and ultrasonication technique and they were used alone and in combination to check their efficacy against OSCC induced animal model. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution study of the optimized formulations for PTX, 5-FU and AA loaded SLN was performed. The SLN shows a biphasic nature of drug release both in the in-vitro and in-vivo system. SLN loaded with PTX in combination with SLN loaded with AA shows a greater potency in the treatment of OSCC in-vivo. The Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies of SLN depict a better therapeutic efficacy. The combination of PTX and AA loaded SLN can be a novel approach for the treatment of OSCC.

Self-Assembling Monomeric Nucleoside Molecular Nanoparticles Loaded with 5-FU Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy against Oral Cancer

Conventional oligonucleotide based drug delivery systems suffer from lengthy synthetic protocols, high cost, and poor chemical or enzymatic stability under certain circumstances. Canonical free individual nucleosides cannot form stable nanostructures in aqueous solution as drug vehicles. Here, we report the development of a monomeric self-assembled nucleoside nanoparticle (SNNP) into an efficient drug delivery system which has currently no parallel in such field. This was achieved using a l-configurational pyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidine nucleoside building block that can form robust discrete nanoparticles in just one step with water as the sole solvent. Its high biocompatibility and low toxicity was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. In mouse xenograft model of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), SNNP loaded with 5-fluoro-uracile (5-FU-SNNP) remarkably retarded the tumor growth compared with free 5-FU, albeit SNNP alone showed no antitumor effect. The stability in blood circulation and the effective concentration of 5-FU in tumor tissue were increased upon the loading with SNNP. TUNEL and immunohistochemistry analyses further indicated that the superior in vivo antitumor efficacy of 5-FU-SNNP compared to free 5-FU was associated with an enhanced degree of inhibition of cell proliferation and stimulation of cell apoptosis. Furthermore, SNNP alleviated the toxic side effects of 5-FU. These findings suggested that when loaded with SNNP, 5-FU has better antitumor efficacy and lower side effects, indicating that SNNP can efficiently act as a readily accessible, robust, biocompatible and low-toxic nanobiomaterial which may find wide therapeutic applications clinically in the future.

Supramolecular assemblies constructed from β-cyclodextrin-modified montmorillonite nanosheets as carriers for 5-fluorouracil

5-Fluorouracil-loaded supramolecular assemblies formed from self-assembling β-cyclodextrin modified montmorillonite nanosheets exhibit better antitumor activity and lower cytotoxicity in vitro.

Neoadjuvant chronomodulated capecitabine with radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a phase II brunch regimen study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of chronomodulated capecitabine administered according to a specific time schedule (Brunch Regimen: Breakfast and Lunch) as a part of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with stage II and III rectal cancer were included. Patients received capecitabine (1,650 mg/m(2) per day; 60% dose at 8:00 AM and 40% dose at 12:00 noon) administered during pelvic radiation (total 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy daily dose between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.). After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent surgery. The primary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and toxicity.

RESULTS

In 17 patients (20%), total tumor regression was achieved according to Dworak pathological grading system. Grade III diarrhea occurred in nine patients (10.5%), while only one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade II or III proctitis were seen in nine (10.5%) subjects, and grade I or II cystitis in six (6.9%). Only three patients (3.3%) developed hand and foot syndrome (both grade I-II). There were no grade IV toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Brunch Regimen for locally advanced rectal cancer consisting of neoadjuvant chronomodulated capecitabine and concurrent radiation therapy is effective and well tolerated with good safety profile, particularly with regard to the occurrence of hand and foot syndrome, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Layered inorganic nanocomposites: a promising carrier for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)

We report here the intercalation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an anticancer drug in interlayer gallery of Na(+) clay (Montmorillonite, MMT), with the assistance of biopolymer (chitosan, CS). The X-ray diffraction patterns, thermal and spectroscopic analyses indicated the drug intercalation into the clay interlayer space in support of CS and stabilized in the longitudinal monolayer by electrostatic interaction. In vitro drug release showed controlled release pattern. The genotoxic effect of drug was in vitro evaluated in human lymphocyte cell culture by comet assay, and results indicated significant reduction in DNA damage when drug was intercalated with clay and formulated in composites. The results of in vitro cell viability assay in cancer cells pointed at decreased toxicity of drug when encapsulated in Na(+)-clay plates than the pristine drug. In vivo pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, hepatotoxicity markers, e.g., SGPT and SGOT, and liver/testicular histology in rats showed plasma/tissue drug levels were within therapeutic window as compared to pristine drug. Therefore, drug-clay hybrid and composites can be of considerable value in chemotherapy of cancer with reduced side effects.

Adherence, compliance and persistence to oral antineoplastic therapy: a review focused on chemotherapeutic and biologic agents

INTRODUCTION

To date, orally administered chemotherapy and biologic agents represent a significant percentage of all antineoplastic treatments in several types of cancer, which are most likely to increase in the near future. In this scenario, the issue of adherence and persistence to oral therapy is a key issue since poor compliance to oral antineoplastic treatments may negatively influence patients' clinical outcomes and, in turn, cause an increase in costs, number of hospitalizations and time spent in the hospital.

AREAS COVERED

The issue of adherence to new oral chemotherapeutic and/or biologic agents has not been deeply evaluated and data published in medical literature are quite scarce. Adherence is a multidimensional phenomenon, which may be influenced by patient- and health-care provider-related factors, anticancer therapy itself, education and socioeconomic aspects. Patients' selection plays, therefore, a key role in maximizing adherence and persistence to oral therapies. Treating health-care practitioners should first evaluate patient reliability to avoid prescribing oral treatments to patients with socioeconomic and medical conditions, which may predict poor adherence.

EXPERT OPINION

Adherence and persistence to new oral biologic agents, which are linked to several side effects and whose use is constantly widening, should represent a main endpoint of clinical research in the nearest future.

Determination of eniluracil and 5-fluorouracil in human plasma by LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents to treat various tumors, and eniluracil (5-ethynyluracil or EU) is being developed as a novel modulator of 5-FU.

RESULTS

A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed for reliably quantifying both EU and 5-FU in human plasma. The method was validated for EU over a dynamic concentration range from 4.13 ng/ml (LOQ) to 1030 ng/ml and for 5-FU over a dynamic concentration range from 8.61 ng/ml (LOQ) to 1080 ng/ml. The analog, 5-bromouracil, was used as the internal standard for calibration curves and quantitation. Method validation has covered the scope of precision, accuracy, specificity, LOQ, linearity/range, freeze-thaw cycles, benchtop integrity/stability, storage stability, matrix effect, recoveries and so on, in accordance with US FDA bioanalytical method validation guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The validated method has shown good applicability for clinical studies and may be used for other clinical trials that involve measuring the concentration of EU and 5-FU simultaneously in human plasma and potentially in other similar biological matrices.

Development and characterization of hyaluronic acid decorated PLGA nanoparticles for delivery of 5-fluorouracil

The present investigation was aimed to develop and explore the prospective of engineered PLGA nanoparticles as vehicles for targeted delivery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Nanoparticles of 5-FU-loaded hyaluronic acid-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (HA-PEG-PLGA-FU) copolymer were prepared and characterized by FTIR, NMR, transmission electron microscopy, particle size analysis, DSC, and X-ray diffractometer measurement studies. The nanoparticulate formulation was evaluated for in vitro release, hemolytic toxicity, and hematological toxicity. Cytotoxicity studies were performed on Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cell lines using MTT cell proliferation assay. Biodistribution studies of 99m Tc labeled formulation were conducted on EAT-bearing mice. The in vivo tumor inhibition study was also performed after i.v. administration of HA-PEG-PLGA-FU nanoparticles. The HA conjugated formulation was found to be less hemolytic but more cytotoxic as compared to free drug. The hematological data suggested that HA-PEG-PLGA-FU formulation was less immunogenic compared to plain drug. The tissue distribution studies displayed that HA-PEG-PLGA-FU were able to deliver a higher concentration of 5-FU in the tumor mass. In addition, the HA-PEG-PLGA-FU nanoparticles reduced tumor volume significantly in comparison with 5-FU. Thus, it was concluded that the conjugation of HA imparts targetability to the formulation, and enhanced permeation and retention effect ruled out its access to the non-tumor tissues, at the same time favored selective entry in tumors, thereby reducing the side-effects both in vitro and in vivo.

Pharmacokinetic characteristics and anticancer effects of 5-fluorouracil loaded nanoparticles

Background

It is expected that prolonged circulation of anticancer drugs will increase their anticancer activity while decreasing their toxic side effects. The purpose of this study was to prepare 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) loaded block copolymers, with poly(γ-benzyl-L-glutamate) (PBLG) as the hydrophobic block and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as the hydrophilic block, and then examine the 5-FU release characteristics, pharmacokinetics, and anticancer effects of this novel compound.

Methods

5-FU loaded PEG-PBLG (5-FU/PEG-PBLG) nanoparticles were prepared by dialysis and then scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to observe the shape and size of the nanoparticles, and ultraviolet spectrophotometry was used to evaluate the 5-FU in vitro release characteristics. The pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles in rabbit plasma were determined by measuring the 5-FUby high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To study in vivo effects, LoVo cells (human colon cancer cell line) or Tca8113 cells (human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line) were implanted in BALB/c nude mice that were subsequently treated with 5-FU or 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanospheres.

Results

5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles had a core-shell spherical structure with a diameter of 200 nm and a shell thickness of 30 nm. The drug loading capacity was 27.1% and the drug encapsulation was 61.5%. Compared with 5-FU, 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles had a longer elimination half-life (t_1/2, 33.3 h vs. 5 min), lower peak concentration (C, 4563.5 μg/L vs. 17047.3 μg/L), and greater distribution volume (V_D, 0.114 L vs. 0.069 L). Compared with a blank control, LoVo cell xenografts and Tca8113 cell xenografts treated with 5-FU or 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles grew slower and had prolonged tumor doubling times. 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles showed greater inhibition of tumor growth than 5-FU (p < 0.01). In the PEG-PBLG nanoparticle control group, there was no tumor inhibition (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In our model system, 5-FU/PEG-PBLG nanoparticles changed the pharmacokinetic behavior of 5-FU, thus increasing its anticancer activity. 5-Fluorouracil loaded nanoparticles have potential as a novel anticancer drug that may have useful clinical applications.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

A phase I study of eniluracil/5-FU in combination with radiation therapy for potentially resectable and/or unresectable cancer of the pancreas and distal biliary tract

PURPOSE

Eniluracil is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). It allows for oral dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which may potentially improve the antitumor activity of 5-FU when delivered concurrently with radiotherapy while avoiding the inconvenience and morbidity of continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU. We addressed the safety of oral eniluracil/5-FU combined with radiation therapy and determined the profile of dose-limiting toxicities and recommended Phase II dose (RPTD) in patients with pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with resectable or locally advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer received eniluracil (starting at 6.0 mg/m(2) q12h)/5-FU (starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) q12h). Eniluracil/5-FU were given concurrently with preoperative radiation to 4500 cGy followed by 540 cGy by reduced fields. Surgery was considered 4 weeks after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled. Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all patients. The MTD was not reached and, thus, the RPTD of eniluracil/5-FU was determined to be 10 mg/m(2) q12h/1 mg/m(2) q12h. Two patients with locally advanced disease had a 30-45 percent cross-sectional tumor reduction, one of which underwent margin-negative resection. Two of 5 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 1 of 3 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, with underwent exploratory surgery had margin-negative resections. One patient had a pathologic complete response (pCR). Patient 5-FU plasma exposure increased slightly from Day 8 to Day 31.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral eniluracil/5-FU is feasible, well tolerated, and potentially effective in the neoadjuvant setting. Further investigation of oral fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers for pancreaticobiliary malignancies is warranted.

Monitoring fluoropyrimidine metabolism in solid tumors with in vivo (19)F magnetic resonance spectroscopy

(19)Fluorine magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((19)F MRS) offers unique possibilities for monitoring the pharmacokinetics of fluoropyrimidines in vivo in tumors and normal tissue in a non-invasive way, both in animals and in patients. This method may therefore be useful for predicting response to fluoropyrimidine-based therapy with or without the effects of modulating agents, and this may be of value for the individualization of anticancer therapy and the strategic development of new anticancer drugs. (19)F MRS has been very valuable in elucidating the basic aspects of fluoropyrimidine metabolism, especially in animal studies. Studies in humans have indicated its clinical potential, but widespread application has been hampered by the relatively low detection sensitivity of the method. The recent introduction of clinical MR scanners with magnetic fields above 1.5 T may stimulate increased clinical use of (19)F MRS.

Pharmacogenetic influences on treatment response and toxicity in colorectal cancer

Current use of chemotherapeutic and targeted agents for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) results in high tumor response rates and relatively long overall patient survival. Fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin are highly active in first-line and salvage therapy of colorectal cancer. Targeted therapies, including anti-angiogenesis agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, have been incorporated with traditional chemotherapy and offer additional options for patients with CRC. However, there is marked variability in response to therapy, as well as frequency and severity of toxicities. Molecular markers and pharmacogenomic profiling may improve prediction of patients who will experience significant benefit or toxicity from currently available agents. Validation of these predictive factors in prospective clinical trials is now necessary to allow for a rational and systematic individualization of cancer therapy.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Fluoropyrimidine S-1 on a Once-Daily-for-28-Day Schedule in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

PURPOSE

The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1, which consists of a mixture of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug (tegafur), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor [5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP)], and an inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase [potassium oxonate (oxonic acid)], was developed to increase the feasibility and therapeutic index of 5-FU administered orally. The principal objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of administering S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule every 5 weeks, determine the maximum tolerated dose, characterize the pharmacokinetics of S-1, and seek evidence of anticancer activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of S-1 on a once-daily oral schedule for 28 days every 5 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose in which fewer than two of the first six new patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the tegafur, CDHP, and oxonic acid constituents were characterized.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated with 72 courses of S-1 at three dose levels ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2)/day. Diarrhea, which was often associated with abdominal discomfort and cramping, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of S-1 on this protracted schedule. Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, fatigue, and cutaneous effects were also observed but were rarely severe. Myelosuppression was modest and uncommon. A partial response and a 49% reduction in tumor size were observed in patients with fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma. The pharmacokinetic data suggested potent inhibition of 5-FU clearance by CHDP, with resultant 5-FU exposure at least 10-fold higher than that reported from equitoxic doses of tegafur modulated by uracil in the oral fluoropyrimidine UFT.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for Phase II studies of S-1 administered once daily for 28 consecutive days every 5 weeks is 50 mg/m(2)/day. The pharmacokinetic data indicate substantial modulation of 5-FU clearance by CDHP. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, the predictable toxicity profile of S-1, and the low incidence of severe adverse effects at the recommended Phase II dose, evaluations of S-1 on this schedule are warranted in malignancies that are sensitive to the fluoropyrimidines.

The Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of S-1 after Single Oral Administration to Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose is to determine the effect of food on the bioavailability of S-1, an oral formulation of the 5-fluorouracil (5FU) prodrug Ftorafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, and oxonic acid (an inhibitor of 5FU phosphoribosylation in normal gut mucosa) in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eighteen patients received a single dose of S-1 of 35 mg/m(2) with (535-885 kcal) or without food in a crossover study design: in arm A without breakfast on day -7 and with breakfast on day 0 and in arm B the reversed sequence. Blood samples were taken before and after S-1 administration. This food effect was evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines using log-transformed data.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters for 5FU without breakfast were as follows: Tmax, 107 min; Cmax, 1.60 microm; area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 441 microm x min; and T(1/2), 104 min. Fasting decreased Tmax of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and oxonic acid significantly (P < 0.006) and increased the Cmax (P < 0.013). The food/fast ratio for the AUC of FT was not different, which for 5FU was 0.84 (P = 0.041), for CDHP was 0.89 (P = 0.191), for oxonic acid was 0.48 (P < 0.0005), and for cyanuric acid, the breakdown product of oxonic acid, was 5.1 (P = 0.019). Accumulation of uracil, indicative for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition, was not affected, as well as the T(1/2) of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and oxonic acid. Evaluation of the log-transformed data demonstrated that the 90% confidence interval for the food/fast ratio for the Cmax and AUC of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and uracil were within 70-143% and 80-125%, respectively, indicating no food effect. Only for oxonic acid and cyanuric acid were these values outside this interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Food intake affected only the pharmacokinetics of the S-1 constituent oxonic acid but not of FT, CDHP, and 5FU. Because oxonic acid is included to protect against gastrointestinal toxicity, this observation might affect the gastrointestinal toxicity and thus the efficacy of S-1.

A Phase I trial of preoperative eniluracil plus 5-fluorouracil and radiation for locally advanced or unresectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum and colon

PURPOSE

Eniluracil, an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows for oral dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which avoids the morbidity of continuous infusion 5-FU. We addressed the safety of oral eniluracil and 5-FU combined with preoperative radiotherapy and determined the recommended Phase II dose and dose-limiting toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal and colon cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with TNM Stage II or III rectal cancer and residual or recurrent colon cancer received eniluracil (starting at 6.0 mg/m(2) every 12 h) and 5-FU (starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) every 12 h). Eniluracil and 5-FU were given with a 5-week course of preoperative radiotherapy of 4500 cGy, with a possible 540-cGy boost. Surgery was performed approximately 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 1 patient was withdrawn owing to noncompliance. Chemotherapy was completed in all patients; radiotherapy was completed in 20 patients. The recommended Phase II dose of eniluracil and 5-FU was 8 mg/m(2) every 12 h and 0.8 mg/m(2) every 12 h, respectively. Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity. Eleven of the 17 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent a sphincter-sparing procedure. One patient had a pathologic complete response.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral eniluracil and 5-FU is feasible and well tolerated. Additional investigation is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral formulation of ftorafur, oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (molar ratio 1:0.4:1) in patients with solid tumors

S-1 is an oral formulation of ftorafur (FT), oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. FT is a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, CDHP is a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor and oxonic acid is an inhibitor of 5-FU phosphoribosylation in the gastrointestinal mucosa and was included to prevent gastrointestinal toxicity. We determined the pharmacokinetics of S-1 in 28 patients at doses of 25, 35, 40 and 45 mg/m(2). The plasma C(max) values of FT, 5-FU, oxonic acid and CDHP increased dose-dependently and after 1-2 h were in the ranges 5.8-13 microM, 0.4-2.4 microM, 0.026-1.337 microM, and 1.1-3.6 microM, respectively. Uracil levels, indicative of DPD inhibition, also increased dose-dependently from basal levels of 0.03-0.25 microM to 3.6-9.4 microM after 2-4 h, and 0.09-0.9 microM was still present after 24 h. The pharmacokinetics of CDHP and uracil were linear over the dose range. The areas under the plasma concentration curves (AUC) for CDHP and uracil were in the ranges 418-1735 and 2281-8627 micromol x min/l, respectively. The t(1/2) values were in the ranges 213-692 and 216-354 min, respectively. Cumulative urinary excretion of FT was predominantly as 5-FU and was 2.2-11.9%; the urinary excretion of both fluoro-beta-alanine and uracil was generally maximal between 6 and 18 h. During 28-day courses with twice-daily S-1 administration, 5-FU and uracil generally increased. Before each intake of S-1, 5-FU varied between 0.5 and 1 microM and uracil was in the micromolar range (up to 7 microM), indicating that effective DPD inhibition was maintained during the course. In a biopsy of an esophageal adenocarcinoma metastasis that had regressed, thymidylate synthase, the target of 5-FU, was inhibited 50%, but increased four- to tenfold after relapse in subsequent biopsies. In conclusion, oral S-1 administration resulted in prolonged exposure to micromolar 5-FU concentrations due to DPD inhibition, and the decrease in uracil levels after 6 h followed the pattern of CDHP and indicates reversible DPD inhibition.

A dose-escalating study of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was shown in early clinical studies to have promising activity against gastrointestinal malignancies. Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU also has activity against these tumour types. The primary objective of this study was to determine a tolerable dose for oral eniluracil/5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies were recruited into this open-label study. Patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle), and the dose intensity of oral eniluracil/5-FU was gradually increased by escalating the number of days of treatment per course.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose intensity was eniluracil/5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily for 16 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities included vomiting and diarrhoea. The objective tumour response rate was 26% with a median duration of response of 15.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 8.5-22.1). Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced neurotoxicity (sensory neuropathy or cold-related dysaesthesia), although only two events were severe (grade 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for future study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer is 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for 14 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each treatment cycle.

A phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel plus prolonged oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with refractory malignancies

PURPOSE

This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated doses, and recommended phase II doses of the combination of weekly intravenous paclitaxel and oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received paclitaxel i.v. over 1 hour weekly for four consecutive weeks of each cycle. Oral eniluracil/5-FU was administered orally twice daily for 28 consecutive days starting on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles were repeated every 35 days. Patients were accrued at six different dosing combinations. Weekly paclitaxel doses ranged from 60 mg/m(2) to 80 mg/m(2), and oral eniluracil/5-FU doses ranged from 8.0/0.8 mg/m(2) to 11.5/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received 126 cycles of therapy. Myelosuppression was minimal at all dose levels, with no grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia reported. DLT was reported in three out of six patients enrolled at the highest dose level and consisted of grade 3 diarrhea (two patients) and grade 3 mucositis (one patient). No DLTs were reported in patients enrolled at lower dose levels. One complete response and three partial responses were reported in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and eniluracil/5-FU was generally well tolerated. The recommended doses for further phase II testing are paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 4 weeks plus eniluracil/ 5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-28 with cycles repeated every 35 days.

The effect of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency on outcomes with fluorouracil

The use of fluorouracil has been complicated by unpredictable pharmacokinetics, low response rates and seemingly random toxicity. The variable pharmacology is largely due to inherited differences in expression of the metabolising enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This converts fluorouracil to inactive metabolites (catabolic pathway) and ultimately dictates the amount of fluorouracil that is available to be metabolised to cytotoxic nucleotides (anabolic pathway). Absolute and partial DPD deficiency affect around 0.1 and 3% of the Caucasian population, respectively. Administration of conventional doses of fluorouracil to these individuals has resulted in profound bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity, especially in those with absolute DPD deficiency. Other forms of toxicity such as myocardial ischaemia have been difficult to attribute directly to DPD deficiency. Efforts to improve outcomes with fluorouracil have included monitoring of fluorouracil concentrations and modifying fluorouracil administration techniques (e.g. from bolus injections to protracted intravenous infusions). In general, these moves have met with limited therapeutic advancement. The recognition that DPD deficiency increases toxicity has lead to the suggestion that genotypic or phenotypic assessment of DPD status prior to initiating fluorouracil may help predict outcomes. The gene that encodes for DPD expression is called DPYD. Approximately 1% of Caucasians are heterozygotes for the DPYD*2A mutation which is the variant allele that is most frequently implicated in DPD deficiency. Screening for this mutation may identify around 60% of individuals with absolute DPD deficiency who are at the greatest risk of toxicity. Another approach is to determine DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with low activity suggesting an increased risk of toxicity. Intratumoral DPD activity may also be assessed with high activity suggesting a poorer response to fluorouracil. Recently, drugs that inhibit DPD (e.g. eniluracil) have become available. These remove much of the variability in fluorouracil pharmacokinetics and may make assessment of DPD activity redundant. Despite the considerable inroads that have been made, further study is needed before the best means of optimising fluorouracil treatment is determined.

Efficacy and quality-of-life data are related in a phase II trial of oral chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and tumor response after administration of an oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients received a mean number of 5.8 cycles of therapy. QOL data were analyzed at baseline, after every two cycles of therapy, and at the time of treatment discontinuation. The Uniscale and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 were both utilized.

RESULTS

The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17% to 37%). Median survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 15.1 months). Global QOL scores were unchanged over the course of therapy by either tool. Only the physical function subscale score had worsened at the end of therapy. In an analysis of responding patients, significant and durable improvements in both global QOL measures as well as select subscale scores were observed. Diarrhea and physical function QOL scores had declined at the time of treatment discontinuation. Patients who did not respond to therapy had preserved QOL scores when they were evaluated after two cycles of therapy.

CONCLUSION

This oral treatment strategy preserved QOL in treated patients. Global QOL measures as well as several QOL subscale scores significantly improved in patients with a documented response to therapy. The profile of improved QOL components indicated that patient well-being was related to tumor response in specific and perceivable ways. Nonresponding patients reported preserved QOL during the first two cycles of therapy. QOL analysis was feasible and informative in this moderately sized multicenter phase II trial.

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouacil through dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial of eniluracil and 5-fluorouracil in advanced resistant colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the hypothesis that a systemic agent designed to inhibit dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the first enzyme in the fluoropyrimidine degradative pathway, could improve the effective amount of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) delivered to a tumor resulting in enhanced response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility included cytologically or pathologically verified diagnosis of colorectal cancer that recurred during or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant therapy, representing patients generally considered resistant to fluorinated pyrimidine therapy. Stratification was into two cohorts: recurrence while receiving adjuvant therapy, and relapse within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy. Treatment consisted of 28 days of oral therapy every five weeks with eniluracil and 5-FU administered in a 10:1 ratio. The daily dose of eniluracil was 10 mg/m2 with 5-FU 1 mg/m2, divided into two doses.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients are evaluable for response: 9 relapsed during therapy and 16 relapsed within one year of adjuvant therapy. In the first group, there was one partial response (9%; 95% CI 0-41%); in the second cohort there was one confirmed complete response (5%; 95% CI 0-23%) and one unconfirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen lacks significant activity in this target population. Pre-treatment intratumoral DPD expression was not assessed, therefore the mechanism of fluorinated pyrimidine resistance cannot be specifically attributed to elevated DPD levels. Attempting restoration of chemotherapy sensitivity through blockade of enzymes or signal transduction molecules responsible for resistance is rational, provided that tumor target expression is the basis for trial entry.

Phase I study of eniluracil, oral 5-fluororacil and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancy

PURPOSE

The objectives of this trial were to assess the maximal tolerated dose and toxicity of the combination of oral eniluracil and 5-fluorouracil and intravenous gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, incurable malignancy (solid tumor or lymphoma) refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists were enrolled. The treatment plan consisted of weekly gemcitabine for three weeks with twice daily dosing of 5-FU and eniluracil for 21 days beginning on day one of gemcitabine. Cycles repeated on an every four week schedule. The initial cohort received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, oral 5-FU 0.6 mg/m2 and eniluracil 6.0 mg/m2.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Eight patients received less than 2 cycles of therapy. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity predominated, with 48% of courses resulted in grade one or two neutropenia. Hematologic toxicity was dose limiting. One treatment related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine offers an oral alternative for 5-FU administration. The recommended phase II dose is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, 5FU 1.2 mg/m2 and eniluracil 12 mg/m2.

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Conventional systemic chemotherapy currently available for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma is ineffective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of patients with this highly refractory disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label study evaluated a 28-day oral regimen of 5-FU (1 mg/m2 twice daily) plus the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, eniluracil (10 mg/m2 twice daily), in patients with chemotherapy-naive or anthracycline-refractory inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients enrolled into the study. No patient showed a confirmed partial or complete tumor response, although nine patients (25%) had a best response of stable disease. The median duration of progression-free survival was 9.6 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-10.6 weeks], and the median duration of overall survival was 32.7 weeks (95% CI 17.4-71.6 weeks). Eniluracil/5-FU was well tolerated. Diarrhea, the most frequent treatment-related non-hematological toxicity, occurred in 11 patients (31%). Hematological toxicities were infrequent and usually mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Eniluracil/5-FU as a 28-day oral outpatient regimen is well tolerated by patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma, although minimal activity was observed when given as monotherapy at the dose used in this study.

Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients.

CONCLUSION

Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.

New options for outpatient chemotherapy--the role of oral fluoropyrimidines

For several decades fluoropyrimidines, especially 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have played a role in standard chemotherapy regimens for a range of solid tumours, including breast and colorectal cancers. In recent years, schedule modification and biomodulation have achieved improved efficacy and tolerability. However, the complications arising from infused intravenous administration are well-recognized and there is an unmet medical need for oral agents with improved efficacy and tolerability, offering more convenient outpatient therapy. Several oral fluoropyrimidines are in development, including capecitabine, UFT (uracil plus tegafur), S-1 and eniluracil. As yet, only UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine have been evaluated in randomized phase III clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer. Both have demonstrated safety benefits and equivalent survival compared with the Mayo Clinic regimen, and capecitabine has demonstrated a significantly superior response rate. Time to disease progression was equivalent to the Mayo Clinic regimen with capecitabine, but inferior with UFT/leucovorin. Capecitabine is also effective in patients with taxoid-pretreated metastatic breast cancer, a population which previously had no established treatment options. Both capecitabine and UFT/leucovorin are being evaluated in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer, and vinorelbine and docetaxel/paclitaxel in breast cancer. In the future, these more convenient, oral fluoropyrimidines may replace intravenous 5-FU in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancer.

The oral fluorinated pyrimidines

The fluorinated pyrimidines have played a major role in the treatment of many common tumors since 5-fluorouracil (5FU) was first introduced. Studies of the cellular and clinical pharmacology of 5FU have led to an improved understanding of the mechanisms of action of this agent. This knowledge has allowed the optimal and rational development of fluoropyrimidine therapy, with significant therapeutic advances in recent years. Efforts to improve the therapeutic index of 5FU have included alteration of schedule, and the addition of biochemical modulators such as folinic acid. Although protracted continuous infusion of 5FU has led to better response rates and decreased toxicity, the administration of 5FU by protracted infusion is not only costly, but also inconvenient to the patient. Furthermore it is often associated with infectious and thrombotic complications related to the required indwelling intravenous catheter. Protracted oral administration is a rational route for administering 5FU, being preferred by the patient and the pharmaco-economist. The unpredictable and low oral bioavailability of 5FU initially discouraged this form of treatment. This problem has now been overcome by the new generation of oral fluoropyrimidines. Two main strategies have been pursued: 1) The administration of an inactive prodrug of 5FU, which is absorbed intact, and subsequently converted to 5FU. Capecitabine is converted to 5FU by a 3 step enzymatic process. 2) The administration of 5FU with an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to minimise the erratic absorption and variable clearance of 5FU: the preparations UFT, S1, and ethinyluracil/5FU contain an oral fluoropyrimidine co-administered orally with inhibitors of this enzyme. The development and characteristics of these agents are discussed.

Novel chemotherapy agents for colorectal cancer: oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and raltitrexed

Agents now under investigation for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) include the oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and raltitrexed. Research efforts directed at finding agents that conveniently and effectively deliver 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a protracted fashion have led to the development of several oral fluoropyrimidines. These agents, which include capecitabine; tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin (UFT/LV); eniluracil plus oral 5-FU; and S-1, are convenient and less toxic than intravenous bolus 5-FU. Oxaliplatin has a uniquely different mechanism of action compared with that of 5-FU and has demonstrated activity not only in the first-line treatment setting but also in patients whose disease has progressed during or following 5-FU treatment. In the first-line setting, when oxaliplatin is combined with 5-FU plus LV, response rates and time to disease progression are remarkably improved compared with 5-FU/LV alone. Raltitrexed, a unique thymidylate synthase inhibitor, has undergone extensive phase III evaluation in CRC. The advent of these novel agents has led to development of combined chemotherapy regimens now being introduced into the adjuvant setting.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of i.v. hydroxyurea infusion given with i.p. 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and leucovorin

Preclinical data suggests that the action of fluoropyrimidines may be enhanced by the addition of hydroxyurea. We developed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of i.v. hydroxyurea (HU) in combination with i.p. 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) and leucovorin (LV). Eligible patients had metastatic carcinoma confined mostly to the peritoneal cavity, and adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Patients were treated with a fixed dose of FUdR (3 g) and LV (640 mg) administered on days 1--3. HU was administered as a 72-h infusion starting simultaneously with i.p. therapy on day 1. The following dose levels were studied: 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.6 g/m(2)/day. Pharmacokinetics were studied in blood and peritoneal fluid. Twenty-eight patients were accrued. Steady-state plasma and peritoneal fluid HU levels increased with increasing dose, and steady state was achieved within 12 h of continuous dosing. The steady-state HU plasma:peritoneal fluid concentration ratio ranged from 1.06 x 10(3) to 1.25 x 10(3) and the plasma HU clearance ranged from 4.63 to 5.81 l/h/m(2). Peritoneal fluid AUC = 137,639 +/- 43,914 microg/ml x min, t(1/2) = 100.9 +/- 56.4 min and Cl = 25.29 +/- 10.88 ml/min. Neutropenia represented the dose-limiting toxicity. We conclude that i.p. FUdR and LV in combination with i.v. HU is well tolerated. The addition of systemic HU increased the incidence of myelosuppression.

Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract. Eniluracil is a potent inactivator of DPD which results in 100% oral bioavailability of 5-FU. Leucovorin (LV) is another biochemical modulator of 5-FU that potentiates inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the primary target of 5-FU. The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of an oral regimen containing eniluracil, 5-FU, and LV in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6. Cycles were repeated at 28-day intervals.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6, 25%), with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses. Three additional patients had partial responses that were not confirmed at subsequent evaluations. The median time to progression of disease was 4.4 months (95% CI = 3.45, 7.69) and the median survival time was 12.6 months (95% CI = 9.1, 14.75). Grade 3-5 toxicity (1 toxic death) occurred in 51 patients (85%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (42%), and 18 patients (30%) had Grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-one patients (35%) were hospitalized for toxicity, and 12 (20%) had febrile neutropenia. Baseline creatinine clearance was associated inversely with severe toxicity (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although antitumor activity was observed, the frequent occurrence of severe toxicity with this regimen limited its clinical utility. Alternate schedules with a more favorable therapeutic index are undergoing clinical testing and should be pursued. The high level of toxicity observed with orally administered low dose 5-FU underscored the potency of eniluracil as a biochemical modulator.

Fluorouracil and the new oral fluorinated pyrimidines

OBJECTIVE

To briefly review the biotransformation and bioavailability of fluorouracil (5-FU); discuss the effects of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DpD) on the efficacy and toxicity profiles of 5-FU; and review a new class of drugs known collectively as the oral fluorinated pyrimidines, which inhibit or circumvent DpD activity and, when administered with 5-FU, alter its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE literature search was conducted (1966-March 1999) using the search terms fluoropyrimidines, fluorouracil, 5-FU, fluorinated pyrimidines, capecitabine, eniluracil, uracil-tegafur, uracil-ftorafur, UFT, S1, BMS-247616, and BOF-A2. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Both preclinical and clinical literature were reviewed and analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new oral fluorinated pyrimidines appear to produce antitumor activity equivalent or superior to that of intravenously administered 5-FU by achieving higher intratumoral 5-FU concentrations or sustained 5-FU exposure. These agents are generally associated with manageable and non-life-threatening toxicities. The oral route of administration facilitates ease of administration and may reduce total healthcare costs associated with 5-FU-sensitive tumors. More studies are needed to assess the therapeutic and economic benefits of the oral fluorinated pyrimidines.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioavailability, efficacy, and toxicity of 5-FU depend on its catabolic rate-limiting enzyme, The new oral fluorinated pyrimidines inhibit or circumvent DpD activity and, when combined with 5-FU, increase 5-FU's bioavailability and cytotoxic effects and decrease its toxicities. Results of Phase I and II studies in patients with a variety of malignancies suggest positive outcomes, including greater efficacy, less drug-related toxicity, lower costs related to drug administration, and greater patient convenience.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

Fluorouracil (5-FU) given as a weekly, high-dose 24-hour infusion is active and tolerable. We evaluated an oral regimen of eniluracil (which inactivates dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase [DPD]), 5-FU, and leucovorin to simulate this schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received a single 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (2,300 mg/m(2) on day 2) with leucovorin (15 mg orally [PO] bid on days 1 through 3) to provide reference pharmacokinetic data. Two weeks later, patients began treatment with eniluracil (20 mg) and leucovorin (15 mg) (PO bid on days 1 through 3) and 5-FU (10 to 15 mg/m(2) PO bid on day 2).

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue) was seen with 5-FU 15 mg/m(2) PO bid on day 2 given weekly for either 6 of 8 weeks or 3 of 4 weeks, whereas five of seven patients tolerated 5-FU 10 mg/m(2) PO bid given weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Eniluracil led to a 35-fold reduction in 5-FU clearance. Fluoro-beta-alanine, a 5-FU catabolite, was not detected in plasma during oral 5-FU-eniluracil therapy. DPD activity was markedly suppressed in all patients during eniluracil therapy; the inactivation persisted after the last eniluracil dose; percentages of baseline values were 1.8% on day 5, 4.5% on day 12, and 23.6% on day 19.

CONCLUSION

The recommended oral dosage of 5-FU (10 mg/m(2) PO bid) given with eniluracil and leucovorin is approximately 115-fold lower than the reference dosage for 24-hour infusional 5-FU. This difference is greater than expected given the reduction in 5-FU clearance. DPD inactivation persisted for several weeks after completion of eniluracil therapy.