Docetaxel and cisplatin in combination as first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group

Molecular methods for increasing the effectiveness of ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review

Background: The aim of the current study is to analyze and summarize the latest research on improving therapy in ovarian cancer. Materials & methods: Data analysis was based on a review of publications from 2011 to 2021 in the PubMed database with use of the search terms including 'EGFR ovarian cancer', 'folate receptor inhibitors ovarian cancer', 'VEGF ovarian cancer', 'PDGF ovarian cancer' and 'CTLA-4 ovarian cancer'. Results: 6643 articles were found; 238 clinical trials and randomized control trials were analyzed; 122 studies were rejected due to inconsistency with the topic of the work. Conclusion: Extensive research on the treatment of ovarian cancer increases the chance of developing the most effective therapy suited to the individual needs of the patient.

Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update

In 2014, FIGO's Committee for Gynecologic Oncology revised the staging of ovarian cancer, incorporating ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer into the same system. Most of these malignancies are high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Stage IC is now divided into three categories: IC1 (surgical spill); IC2 (capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface); and IC3 (malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings). The updated staging includes a revision of Stage IIIC based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes alone without intraperitoneal dissemination. This category is now subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension), and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension). Stage IIIA2 is now "microscopic extrapelvic peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph node" metastasis. This review summarizes the genetics, surgical management, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies for epithelial cancers, and the treatment of ovarian germ cell and stromal malignancies.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in metastatic ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study

The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In the present multicenter study, the medical records of patients who received NDLS (60-75 mg/m²; 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer in routine clinical care were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed-up from September 2014 until September 2018. The efficacy endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate measured in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 13 patients evaluated, 46.2% (6/13) received NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy and 53.8% (7/13) patients received second-line chemotherapy [platinum-sensitive, 57.1% (4/7); platinum-resistant, 42.9% (3/7)]. The ORRs were 60.0% (3/5) and 57.1% (4/7) for patients receiving first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. The estimated median OS for patients receiving NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy was 17.4 months (follow-up duration, 4.3-49.4 months). The estimated median OS was 26.1 months (follow-up duration, 5.1-37.5 months) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease, whereas the OS was 14.8 months (follow-up duration, 3.5-14.8 months) in patients with platinum-resistant disease. No grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were observed; ≥1 AE in grade I-II was reported in 84.6% (11/13) of patients. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well-tolerated in the management of metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Role of hsa‑miR‑105 during the pathogenesis of paclitaxel resistance and its clinical implication in ovarian cancer

More than 70% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), one of the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths worldwide, are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Currently, the mainstay for treatment of advanced EOC is tumor debulking surgery followed by combined platinum- and paclitaxel (PTX)-based chemotherapy. However, most patients eventually develop chemoresistance, which remains a major obstacle to successful treatment. Herein, by using clinical specimens and experimentally induced cell models, we found that the expression levels of hsa-miR-105 were significantly decreased in PTX-resistant EOC tissues and cell lines. Follow-up functional experiments demonstrated that repression of hsa-miR-105 conferred resistance to paclitaxel in EOC cells, whereas restoration of hsa-miR-105 expression in situ via intratumoral injection of hsa-miR-105 micrON™ agomir potentiated in vivo sensitivity to PTX and thereafter significantly inhibited tumor growth in a PTX-challenged xenograft model. Mechanistically, hsa-miR-105 exerted its tumor suppressor function by directly inhibiting the zinc and ring finger 2 (ZNRF2) signaling pathway. Importantly, aberrant expression of hsa-miR-105 in both tumor and circulating samples predicted a poor post-chemotherapy prognosis in EOC patients. These findings collectively suggest that hsa-miR-105 may act as a potent tumor suppressor miRNA during the progression of EOC, likely affecting cell proliferation, invasiveness and chemosensitivity to PTX, and functioning at least in part via inhibition of ZNRF2 signaling. The stability and availability and ease in measurement of circulating hsa-miR-105 make it a valuable diagnostic/prognostic biomarker candidate for chemotherapy of EOC.

Chemotherapy Resistance in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common gynaecologic malignancy seen in women. Majority of the patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at the advanced stage making prognosis poor. The standard management of advanced ovarian cancer includes tumour debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. Various types of chemotherapeutic regimens have been used to treat advanced ovarian cancer, but the most promising and the currently used standard first-line treatment is carboplatin and paclitaxel. Despite improved clinical response and survival to this combination of chemotherapy, numerous patients either undergo relapse or succumb to the disease as a result of chemotherapy resistance. To understand this phenomenon at a cellular level, various macromolecules such as DNA, messenger RNA and proteins have been developed as biomarkers for chemotherapy response. This review comprehensively summarizes the problem that pertains to chemotherapy resistance in advanced ovarian cancer and provides a good overview of the various biomarkers that have been developed in this field.

Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

The Gynecologic Oncology Committee of FIGO in 2014 revised the staging of ovarian cancer, incorporating ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer into the same system. Most of these malignancies are high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Stage IC is now divided into three categories: IC1 (surgical spill); IC2 (capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface); and IC3 (malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings). The updated staging includes a revision of Stage IIIC based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes alone without intraperitoneal dissemination. This category is now subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension), and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension). Stage IIIA2 is now "microscopic extrapelvic peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph node" metastasis. This review summarizes the genetics, surgical management, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies for epithelial cancers, and the treatment of ovarian germ cell and stromal malignancies.

Identification of cisplatin sensitizers through high-throughput combinatorial screening

cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum/cisplatin (CDDP) is a major drug used in cancer chemotherapy; however, the toxic side-effects and development of drug resistance represent major challenges to the clinical use of CDDP. The aim of the present study was to identify effective drug combination regimens through high-throughput drug screening that can enhance the efficacy of CDDP, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. A cell-based high-throughput screening methodology was implemented, using a library of 1,280 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, to identify clinical compounds that act synergistically with CDDP. Our study identified two compounds, namely potassium antimony tartrate and topotecan, that significantly enhanced the sensitivity of colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer cells to CDDP. The synergistic action of both compounds with CDDP was confirmed by further quantitative analyses. Topotecan is a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor that has previously been shown to enhance the clinical response and overall patient survival when combined with CDDP by a yet unclear mechanism. We demonstrated that the combination of topotecan with CDDP significantly inhibited colony formation ability and increased the apoptosis of several cancer cell lines. Mechanistic analyses revealed that topotecan enhanced CDDP-induced DNA damage and inhibited the repair of DNA strand breaks, without affecting the cellular platinum content. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrated that the use of the FDA-approved drug panel in high-throughput screening is an effective method for identifying effective therapeutic regimens that are clinically relevant, and may have high feasibility for translation into clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment Modifications in Ovarian Carcinoma: The Impact on Surgical Outcome and Progression-free Survival

OBJECTIVE

Little is known on the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) treatment modifications on surgical outcome and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ovarian carcinoma. We aimed to report the changes we made during NACT and to evaluate its impact on patient outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma treated with NACT followed by interval cytoreduction in one university-affiliated medical center (January 2005 to June 2017). We excluded those who were treated with NACT without any surgical intervention. NACT modifications included delay in treatment, change in chemotherapy, and dose reduction. Demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcome, and PFS were compared between patients exposed to NACT treatment modifications and those who received standard treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria of whom, 59 patients received standard, nonmodified treatment and 20 patients modified NACT. There were no intergroup differences with respect to age at diagnosis (59.5±11.6 vs. 64.70±8.09, P=0.09) and stage of disease (P=0.13). Radiologic complete response rates (25.0% vs. 32.2%, P=0.545) and optimal cytoreduction rates (75.0% vs. 86.4%, P=0.23) were similar in both treatment groups. Mean PFS (in months) was comparable between patients receiving standard treatment and those who required NACT modifications (18.5 vs. 12.2, P=0.125).

CONCLUSIONS

NACT treatment modifications did not affect surgical outcome and PFS. We conclude that when clinically indicated, dose alteration and scheduling can be implemented without apparent detriment to outcome.

Nanoparticle delivery of chemotherapy combination regimen improves the therapeutic efficacy in mouse models of lung cancer

The combination chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin (CP) and docetaxel (DTX) is effective against a variety of cancers. However, combination therapies present unique challenges that can complicate clinical application, such as increases in toxicity and imprecise exposure of tumors to specific drug ratios that can produce treatment resistance. Drug co-encapsulation within a single nanoparticle (NP) formulation can overcome these challenges and further improve combinations' therapeutic index. In this report, we employ a CP prodrug (CPP) strategy to formulate poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLGA-PEG) NPs carrying both CPP and DTX. The dually loaded NPs display differences in drug release kinetics and in vitro cytotoxicity based on the structure of the chosen CPP. Furthermore, NPs containing both drugs showed a significant improvement in treatment efficacy versus the free drug combination in vivo.

High Efficacy and Low Toxicity of the Modified Docetaxel and Carboplatin Protocol in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer-A Phase 2 Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer will experience a recurrence; currently, there is no cure. In patients with platinum-sensitive disease (platinum-free interval >6 months), a combination similar to that used as frontline therapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) is recommended. However, it is associated with a high incidence (20%) of neurotoxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of combination docetaxel/carboplatin therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Forty patients with recurrent, histologically proven ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer were enrolled in this phase 2 trial. The study protocol included combination therapy with docetaxel, 30 mg/m, on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin, area under the curve 5, on day 1, every 21 days. Twenty received the classical paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen (control group), and another 20 received the modified docetaxel/carboplatin protocol (study group).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 78 months for the study group and 62 months for the control group. The study group had a higher overall response rate compared to controls: 80% and 30%, respectively (P = 0.004; relative risk, 9.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-39.96). Complete response was achieved in 60% and 25%, respectively (P = 0.054). The study group patients showed a superior 2-year survival rate of 75% compared with the 35% of the controls (P = 0.011; relative risk, 5.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-21.56). Hematological and neurological toxicity rates did not differ between the groups (P = 0.451 and P = 0.605, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who received the modified docetaxel/carboplatin regimen had higher overall response and survival rates compared to those who had the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, with no difference in toxicity. Future larger studies should focus on strategies to compare this regimen to the current standard, with an emphasis on quality of life.

Xc- inhibitor sulfasalazine sensitizes colorectal cancer to cisplatin by a GSH-dependent mechanism

Sulfasalazine (SSZ) is an anti-inflammatory drug that has been demonstrated to induce apoptosis and tumor regression through inhibition of plasma membrane cystine transporter xc(-). Cysteine is a rate-limiting precursor for intracellular glutathione (GSH) synthesis, which is vital for compound detoxification and maintaining redox balance. Platinum-based chemotherapy is an important regimen used in clinics for various cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). We hypothesized that targeting xc(-) transporter by SSZ may annihilate cellular detoxification through interruption of GSH synthesis and may enhance the anti-cancer activity of cisplatin (CDDP) by increasing drug transport. In the present study, we revealed that xCT, the active subunit of xc(-), is highly expressed in CRC cell lines and human colorectal carcinoma tissues compared with their normal counterparts. SSZ effectively depleted cellular GSH, leading to significant accumulation of reactive oxygen species and growth inhibition in CRC cells. In contrast, the normal epithelial cells of colon origin were less sensitive to SSZ, showing a moderate ROS elevation. Importantly, SSZ effectively enhanced the intracellular platinum level and cytotoxicity of CDDP in CRC cells. The synergistic effect of SSZ and CDDP was reversed by antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). Together, these results suggest that SSZ, a relatively non-toxic drug that targets cystine transporter, may, in combination with CDDP, have effective therapy for colorectal cancer.

Prodrug-based nano-drug delivery system for co-encapsulate paclitaxel and carboplatin for lung cancer treatment

CONTEXT

Paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin (CBP) are widely used for the combined chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the development of multidrug resistance of cancer cells, as well as systemic toxic side effects resulting from nonspecific localization of anticancer drugs to non-tumor areas are major obstacles to the success of chemotherapy in treating cancers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to engineer a prodrug-based nano-drug delivery system for co-encapsulate hydrophilic (CBP) and hydrophobic anti-tumor drugs (PTX). This system was expected to resolve the multidrug resistance cause by single drug, and the dual-drug-loaded liposome was also planned to specifically target the cancer cells without obvious influence on normal cells and tissues.

METHODS

In this paper, PLGA-PEG-CBP was synthesized by the conjugation between the carboxylic group of PLGA-PEG-COOH and the amino group of CBP. Then, self-assembled nanoparticles for combination delivery of PTX and PLGA-PEG-CBP (PTX/CBP NPs) were prepared by solvent displacement technique. The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor efficacy was assessed in NCL-H460 human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line.

RESULTS

PTX/CBP NPs achieved the highest cytotoxic effect among all formulations in vitro, as compared with single drug delivery NPs. In vivo investigation on NSCLC animal models showed that co-delivery of PTX and CBP possessed high tumor-targeting capacity and strong anti-tumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTX/CBP NPs constructed in this research offers an effective strategy for targeted combinational lung cancer therapy.

Synergistic effects of the sesquiterpene lactone, EPD, with cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer remains still the leading cause of death of gynecological malignancy, in spite of first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel. Although initial response is favorably, relapses are common and prognosis for women with advanced disease stays poor. Therefore efficacious approaches are needed.

METHODS

Previously, an anti-cancer agent, EPD exhibited potent cytotoxic effects towards ovarian cancer and not towards normal cells. Cell viability and cell cycle analysis studies were performed with EPD, in combination with cisplatin and/or paclitaxel, using the ovarian carcinoma cell lines: SK-OV-3, OVCAR-3, JC, JC-pl and normal fibroblasts. Cell viability was measured using Presto Blue and cell cycle analysis using a flow cytometer. Apoptosis was measured in JC and JC-pl , using the caspase 3 assay kit.

RESULTS

In JC-pl, SK-OV-3 and JC, synergistic interactions between either EPD and cisplatin or EPD and paclitaxel were observed. For the first time the effects of EPD on the cell cycle of ovarian cancer cells and normal cells was studied. EPD and combinations of EPD with cisplatin and/ or paclitaxel showed cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase. The combination of EPD and cisplatin showed a significant synergistic effect in cell line JC-pl, while EPD with paclitaxel showed synergistic interaction in JC. Additionally, synergistic drug combinations showed increased apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed a synergistic effect of EPD and cisplatin in an ovarian drug resistant cell line as well as a synergistic effect of EPD and paclitaxel in two other ovarian cell lines. These results might enhance clinical efficacy, compared to the existing regimen of paclitaxel and cisplatin.

Pharmaceuticals that contain polycyclic hydrocarbon scaffolds

This review comprehensively explores approved pharmaceutical compounds that contain polycyclic scaffolds and the properties that these skeletons convey.

Cisplatin plus sodium arsenite and hyperthermia induces pseudo-G1 associated apoptotic cell death in ovarian cancer cells

Cisplatin is effective against solid tumors including ovarian cancer. However, inherent or acquired cisplatin resistance limits clinical success. We recently demonstrated that a combination of sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) and hyperthermia sensitizes p53-expressing ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by modulating DNA repair pathway and enhancing platinum accumulation. However, it is not understood how this combination therapy modulates cell cycle following platinum-DNA damage. The goal of the present study was to determine if NaAsO2 and hyperthermia alter cisplatin-induced G2 arrest and cause mitotic arrest and mitotic catastrophe. Human epithelial ovarian cancer cells (A2780 and A2780/CP70) were treated with cisplatin ± 20 μM NaAsO2 at 37 or 39°C for 1 h. Cisplatin ± NaAsO2 at 37 or 39°C caused cells to accumulate in G2/M compartment at 36 h after treatment. Western blot analysis of cyclin A and cyclin B suggested that combined NaAsO2, hyperthermia, and cisplatin induced mitotic arrest. However, we observed < 3% mitotic index and phosphorylation of histone H3 on serine 10 was undetectable. These results did not confirm mitotic arrest. BUBR1 (BUB1B) also was not phosphorylated, suggesting disrupted mitotic checkpoint. Postmitotic cells accumulated in pseudo-G1 as demonstrated by cyclin E stabilization, CDKN1A induction, and hypophosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. These cells also were positive for Annexin V binding indicating they were apoptotic. In summary, cisplatin plus NaAsO2 and hyperthermia induced pseudo-G1 associated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells.

Intravenous versus oral dexamethasone premedication in preventing Paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity reactions in gynecological malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Dexamethasone premedication is required with paclitaxel to prevent infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Both oral dexamethasone (PO-D; 20 mg 12 and 6 hours before paclitaxel) and intravenous dexamethasone (IV-D; 20 mg 30 minutes before paclitaxel) regimens are used. The optimal premedication regimen and management of patients after HSR are unclear.

METHODS

Data on HSRs in women receiving paclitaxel, 175 mg/m², every 3 weeks at Imperial College Healthcare Trust from May 2011 to February 2012 were obtained from the pharmacy database. During this period, dexamethasone premedication for paclitaxel was administered orally (PO-D; 20 mg 12 and 6 hours before paclitaxel) from May to August 2011, then changed to intravenous dexamethasone (IV-D; 20 mg 30 minutes before paclitaxel) for 3 months, and then reverted to PO-D from November 2011. There were 93 and 55 patients who received PO-D and IV-D before paclitaxel, respectively. Hypersensitivity reaction rates were pooled with those from published studies for analysis. Gynecologic oncology centers in the UK and Canada were surveyed regarding premedication and post-HSR management. A Markov Monte-Carlo simulation model compared costs and benefits of different strategies.

RESULTS

Hypersensitivity reaction rates with PO-D and IV-D were 5.4% (5/93) versus 14.5% (8/55) (P = 0.07) in Imperial College Healthcare Trust patients, and 6.8% (20/290) versus 14.1% (30/212) (P = 0.009) on pooled analysis with data from 2 additional studies (502 patients), respectively. However, IV-D is the most common premedication regimen used in the UK and Canada (48.5% and 34.2% of centers). Post-HSR paclitaxel on a desensitization protocol is a cost-effective alternative to discontinuing paclitaxel altogether.

CONCLUSION

Oral dexamethasone seems to be superior to IV-D in preventing HSRs. Post-HSR patients should be considered for desensitization.

A feasibility study on maintenance of docetaxel after paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Objective

To test the concept of taxane sequencing, this feasibility trial evaluated maintenance of docetaxel after paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with stage IC-IV ovarian cancer.

Methods

All patients received debulking surgery followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy. Attainment of clinically defined complete or partial response was confirmed by image scanning. Maintenance of docetaxel started at an initial dose of 70 mg/m² every 4 weeks for 6 cycles and was extended to 10 cycles unless disease progression and/or recurrence during the protocol therapy or unacceptable toxicities were seen.

Results

Stage subsets in 20 eligible patients were as follows: IIIB, 2 patients (10%); IIIC, 13 patients (65%); IV, 5 patients (25%). Neutropenia was common (40% with grade 3 or 4) and was most frequent during first or second cycle although the disabling peripheral neuropathy was not observed. Twelve patients completed protocol therapy (6≤cycles), while 8 patients failed to complete 6-cycle chemotherapy, because of progressive disease (5 patients) or grade 4 toxicities (3 patients). Median PFS was 20 months and 3-year PFS rate was 12%. Median overall survival was 39 months and 3-year OS rate was 69%.

Conclusion

Six cycles of single-agent docetaxel maintenance chemotherapy is feasible and generally tolerable to women with advanced ovarian cancer who attained a clinically defined response to initial paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy.

β-phenylethyl isothiocyanate reverses platinum resistance by a GSH-dependent mechanism in cancer cells with epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype

Platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy is an important regimen in the clinical treatment of cancer, but development of drug resistance presents a major challenge. One key mechanism involved in resistance to Pt drugs is the decrease of intracellular Pt due to the drug efflux through the glutathione (GSH)-mediated export, and this is particularly significant in cancer cells with stem-cell like properties. In the present study, we showed that two Pt-resistant human cancer cell lines exhibited stem-cell like EMT properties, had high cellular GSH and accumulated significantly less cellular Pt compared to their parental cells, and failed to undergo apoptosis when exposed to Pt at the drug concentrations toxic to the parental cells. Importantly, we found that the natural compound β-phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) was able to effectively abolish this drug resistant mechanism by effective depletion of cellular GSH, leading to a significant increase in cellular Pt as well as DNA-bound Pt. A combination of PEITC and Pt showed a striking synergistic anticancer activity both in vitro and in vivo, as evidenced by an increase in drug-induced apoptosis, a loss of colony formation capacity, and significant suppression of tumor growth in mice. Taken together, our study shows a promising therapeutic strategy to overcome drug resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy and may potentially have broad implications in clinical treatment of cancer.

Phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sagopilone (ZK-EPO) in patients with metastatic breast cancer that has progressed following chemotherapy

Sagopilone is a novel, fully synthetic epothilone that has shown promising preclinical activity in a range of tumor models, including platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This open-label, multicenter, Phase II study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sagopilone administered to patients with MBC. Women with MBC whose previous chemotherapy regimen included a taxane and an anthracycline received sagopilone 16 or 22 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous infusion every 21 days. Efficacy (using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), safety, and tolerability were assessed in this population. A total of 65 patients received sagopilone at either 16 mg/m(2) (N = 39) or 22 mg/m(2) (N = 26). Patients received a median of two cycles of sagopilone. Among the 65 patients who were evaluable for efficacy, there were three confirmed tumor responses over both treatment arms; however, the primary target of the study was not reached. The main treatment-related adverse events were sensory neuropathy (81.5%) and fatigue (44.6%). There were no deaths related to the study drug. Sagopilone was moderately tolerated in both treatment arms and showed limited activity in heavily pre-treated patients with MBC.

Safety and efficacy of a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unknown primary cancer

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of unknown primary cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria included histologic evidence of carcinoma originating in an unknown primary organ, no prior chemotherapy, age range 20 to 75 years, WHO PS < or =3, measurable or evaluable lesions, and adequate organ function. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2) followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m2) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Patients were assessed for tumor response after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and 4 additional cycles were administered unless disease progression was demonstrated.

RESULTS

Between September 1997 and September 2002, 45 patients were enrolled. The median age was 56.5 years (28-73 years), and their performance status (PS) were 0 (11 patients), 1 (26 patients), and 2 (6 patients), respectively, (2 patients were removed from the trial after initial enrollment). A total of 26 patients (60%) presented with lymphadenopathy, 14 patients (33%) with visceral disease, and 3 (7%) with bone and soft-tissue metastases. The overall response rate was 65.1% (4 complete response, 24 partial response, 8 NC, 7 progressive diseases: 95% confidence interval, 48.0-78.4). The median time to progression was 5.0 months. The median survival time was 11.8 months. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Commonly observed side effects included neutropenia (grade 3-4, 16 patients), nausea (grade 3, 13 patients), and nephrotoxicity (grade 2, 5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is a safe and effective regimen for patients with unknown primary cancer.

Adaptive therapy

A number of successful systemic therapies are available for treatment of disseminated cancers. However, tumor response is often transient, and therapy frequently fails due to emergence of resistant populations. The latter reflects the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment as well as the evolutionary capacity of cancer phenotypes to adapt to therapeutic perturbations. Although cancers are highly dynamic systems, cancer therapy is typically administered according to a fixed, linear protocol. Here we examine an adaptive therapeutic approach that evolves in response to the temporal and spatial variability of tumor microenvironment and cellular phenotype as well as therapy-induced perturbations. Initial mathematical models find that when resistant phenotypes arise in the untreated tumor, they are typically present in small numbers because they are less fit than the sensitive population. This reflects the "cost" of phenotypic resistance such as additional substrate and energy used to up-regulate xenobiotic metabolism, and therefore not available for proliferation, or the growth inhibitory nature of environments (i.e., ischemia or hypoxia) that confer resistance on phenotypically sensitive cells. Thus, in the Darwinian environment of a cancer, the fitter chemosensitive cells will ordinarily proliferate at the expense of the less fit chemoresistant cells. The models show that, if resistant populations are present before administration of therapy, treatments designed to kill maximum numbers of cancer cells remove this inhibitory effect and actually promote more rapid growth of the resistant populations. We present an alternative approach in which treatment is continuously modulated to achieve a fixed tumor population. The goal of adaptive therapy is to enforce a stable tumor burden by permitting a significant population of chemosensitive cells to survive so that they, in turn, suppress proliferation of the less fit but chemoresistant subpopulations. Computer simulations show that this strategy can result in prolonged survival that is substantially greater than that of high dose density or metronomic therapies. The feasibility of adaptive therapy is supported by in vivo experiments. [Cancer Res 2009;69(11):4894-903] Major FindingsWe present mathematical analysis of the evolutionary dynamics of tumor populations with and without therapy. Analytic solutions and numerical simulations show that, with pretreatment, therapy-resistant cancer subpopulations are present due to phenotypic or microenvironmental factors; maximum dose density chemotherapy hastens rapid expansion of resistant populations. The models predict that host survival can be maximized if "treatment-for-cure strategy" is replaced by "treatment-for-stability." Specifically, the models predict that an optimal treatment strategy will modulate therapy to maintain a stable population of chemosensitive cells that can, in turn, suppress the growth of resistant populations under normal tumor conditions (i.e., when therapy-induced toxicity is absent). In vivo experiments using OVCAR xenografts treated with carboplatin show that adaptive therapy is feasible and, in this system, can produce long-term survival.

Taxanes in the management of gynecologic malignancies

The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) currently play an important role in the management of cancers of the ovary, uterus and cervix. In each of these gynecologic malignancies, the drugs are routinely employed in combination with a platinum agent, although when delivered as single agents they may provide substantial palliative benefit. It is important to recognize that despite the documented major utility of this class of agents in the treatment of gynecologic cancers, many highly relevant questions remain, including determining optimal drug delivery schedules, the duration of treatment and the role of regional paclitaxel administration.

Docetaxel and Cisplatin (DP) Regimen for Solid Tumors

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy increases the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing and administration of cancer chemotherapy, and review various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Phase I Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Combination With Ifosfamide in Pretreated Ovarian Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose limiting toxicity, the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in association with a fixed dose of ifosfamide (IFO) to patients with recurrent, advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).

METHODS

Patients with progressing platinum-sensitive or resistant disease were included in 5 dose levels consisting of PLD (25 mg/m2 to 45 mg/m2, day 1) combined with a fixed IFO dose administered as a continuous infusion (1700 mg/m2/d, day 1 to 3) to define the MTD on the basis of acute toxicity during the first 2 cycles, then confirm the MTD, by the evaluation of delayed toxicity (hand-foot syndrome).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were treated. The MTD was determined in the first 29 patients to be dose level V (45 mg/m2), with 2 cases of febrile neutropenia. The recommended dose (level IV) combines 40 mg/m2 PLD on day 1 and 1700 mg/m2/d IFO day 1 to day 3. The principal toxicity was hematotoxicity (grade 3-4 neutropenia 61.8% of patients, grade 3/4 thrombcytopenia 7.2%, and grade 3/4 anemia 21.8%). Nonhematological toxicity essentially consisted of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting (14%). Nineteen additional patients were included in levels III (11 patients) and IV (8 patients), to evaluate late-onset toxicity. No hand-foot syndrome was observed in the 48 treated patients, confirming the identification of dose level IV as recommended dose.

CONCLUSION

This study regimen presents an acceptable tolerance. The preliminary assessment of efficacy merits confirmation in a phase II study.

Feasibility study comparing docetaxel–cisplatin versus docetaxel–carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of docetaxel-cisplatin combination therapy compared with docetaxel-carboplatin combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ic-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery were randomly assigned to receive treatment with docetaxel-cisplatin (n = 23) or docetaxel-carboplatin (n = 27). Docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 or carboplatin to an area under the curve of 5 were administered consecutively on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle, for 3 cycles in patients with stage Ic-II cancer and for over 5 cycles in patients with stage III-IV cancer. Patients were evaluated for treatment-related toxicity in each cycle using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0.

RESULTS

Five patients (2 in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm and 3 in the docetaxel-carboplatin arm) discontinued the treatment at the end of the second course of chemotherapy because of apparent disease progression; however, no patients came off the protocol therapy because of treatment-related toxicity. Overall, 103 cycles of docetaxel-cisplatin treatment and 130 cycles of docetaxel-carboplatin treatment were delivered. The major toxicity was neutropenia in both regimens. The total incidence of grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was 83% (19/23) in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm and 96% (26/27) in the docetaxel-carboplatin arm. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was significantly lower in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm [39% (9/23) versus 74% (20/27)].

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel-cisplatin combination therapy may be feasible as first-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer.

Docetaxel in the management of ovarian cancer

Standard first-line treatment for Stage IC-IV ovarian cancer is currently a platinum agent or a combination of a platinum agent with a taxane. The use of a taxane compound in addition to single-agent platinum is increasingly preferred to platinum alone. In countries such as the UK, the taxane paclitaxel has been approved by the government for first-line use. However, it has yet to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA for use in this context. Typically, in countries such as the UK, patients with advanced ovarian cancer receive a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin first line, both drugs given 3-weekly by intravenous infusion. Subsequent trials have demonstrated that the second-generation taxane docetaxel can be used as a substitute for paclitaxel; sharing many of its actions but with a different toxicity profile. However, docetaxel has not yet received approval for standard use. Here, the clinical development of docetaxel and its present and future place in the management of ovarian cancer is discussed.

An evaluation of cytotoxicity of the taxane and platinum agents combination treatment in a panel of human ovarian carcinoma cell lines

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the optimum schedule for combination of taxane and platinum agents in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines.

METHODS

Cell growth inhibition was determined by the standard MTT assay and an IC(50) was calculated for docetaxel, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and carboplatin in seven human ovarian cancer cell lines (CAOV-3, OVCAR-3, SKOV-3, ES-2, OV-90, TOV-112D, and TOV-21G). The IC(50) was defined as the drug concentration required for a 50% reduction in optical density. Cytotoxicity assays were performed with four sequential combinations of a taxane and a platinum compound. In each combination, cell lines were treated with the appropriate IC(50) of the drugs for varying time increments between 3 and 24 h. Controls were no drug, each agent alone and the combination of both. Results were obtained via manual cell counting with a hemocytometer.

RESULTS

The inhibitory concentration to achieve 50% cell death (IC(50)) was determined for each compound in each cell line. The IC(50) ranged from 0.8 to 1.7 nM, 0.7 to 1.8 nM for docetaxel and paclitaxel, respectively, and 17.4 to 25.7 microM, 15.1 to 25.7 microM for cisplatin and carboplatin, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study the combination of docetaxel plus cisplatin was considerably more active in vitro than any of the other taxane plus platinum agent combinations evaluated in the panel of human ovarian cancer cell lines. In vitro activity was similar to previously report clinical studies comparing taxane and platinum combination regimens. This suggests the combination of docetaxel with cisplatin will have enhanced clinical activity compared to the paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen.

Docetaxel plus cisplatin is effective for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to previous anthracycline treatment: a phase II clinical trial

Background

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are frequently exposed to high cumulative doses of anthracyclines and are at risk of resistance and cardiotoxicity. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus cisplatin, as salvage chemotherapy in patients with MBC resistant to prior anthracyclines.

Methods

Patients with MBC that had progressed after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen containing anthracyclines received docetaxel 75 mg/m² followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m² every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles or until disease progression.

Results

Between Jan 2000 and May 2002, 24 patients with tumors primary resistant and 15 with secondary resistant disease were accrued. All 39 patients were evaluable for safety and 36 for efficacy. The objective response rate was 31% (95% CI, 16–45%) with 3 complete responses. The median time to disease progression was 7 months, and the median overall survival was 23 months (median follow-up of 41 months). Neutropenia was the most frequently observed severe hematologic toxicity (39% of patients), whereas asthenia and nausea were the most common non-hematologic toxicities. No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found docetaxel plus cisplatin to be an active and safe chemotherapy regimen for patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines.

The taxanes: toxicity and quality of life considerations in advanced ovarian cancer

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel show good activity in the management of advanced ovarian cancer when used in conjunction with platinum agents. Accumulating evidence from clinical studies, particularly the latest results from the phase III comparative SCOTROC study, indicates that the two drugs confer similar rates of tumour response and survival in women with this condition. However, it is clear that paclitaxel and docetaxel differ in their tolerability profiles and in other respects, and cannot be regarded as directly equivalent drugs. In particular, paclitaxel is associated with significant neurotoxicity; peripheral neuropathy has also been reported with docetaxel, but to a lesser extent. Neutropenia appears more prevalent with docetaxel than with paclitaxel, although clinical trial data show that this adverse effect is manageable and need not compromise dose delivery. Docetaxel is also associated with potential benefits accruing from shorter infusion times and lack of need for premedication with intravenous histamine H(1) and H(2) antagonists. Emerging quality of life data are expected to shed further light on the overall benefit of chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer in general, and on taxane-platinum combinations in particular.

Docetaxel: an alternative taxane in ovarian cancer

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel are potent chemotherapeutic agents that block tubulin depolymerisation, leading to the inhibition of microtubule dynamics and cell cycle arrest. Although docetaxel and paclitaxel share a mutual tubulin binding site, mechanistic and pharmacological differences exist between these agents. For example, docetaxel has increased potency and an improved therapeutic index compared with paclitaxel, and its short 1-h infusion offers a substantial clinical advantage over the prolonged infusion durations required with paclitaxel. In clinical studies, docetaxel monotherapy demonstrated good response rates and an acceptable toxicity profile in both paclitaxel- and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients. In particular, neurotoxicity — a dominant side effect with both paclitaxel and cisplatin — occurs at a low incidence with docetaxel, making docetaxel a promising agent for combining cisplatin and other platinum compounds. In Phase II studies, the combination of docetaxel with either cisplatin or carboplatin has yielded impressive response rates of 69–74 and 81–87%, respectively. Furthermore, Phase III data suggest that docetaxel–carboplatin and paclitaxel–carboplatin are similarly efficacious with respect to progression-free survival and clinical response, although neurotoxicity occurs more frequently with the paclitaxel regimen. While paclitaxel–carboplatin remains the standard treatment for the management of advanced ovarian cancer, docetaxel–carboplatin appears to be a promising alternative, particularly in terms of minimising the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy.

Docetaxel Versus Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile of docetaxel/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin. All patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal malignancies treated with docetaxel and platinum at the University of Iowa between January 1996 and June 1999 were identified. Controls, treated with paclitaxel and platinum, were matched for age, date of diagnosis, type of cancer, stage, and residual disease. Toxicity was evaluated prior to each cycle and was graded according to the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria. Twenty patients were identified in each group and evaluated. In the docetaxel/carboplatin group, sixteen (80%) patients experienced hematologic toxicity. Nine (45%) had grade III or IV neutropenia and fever developed in two of these patients. Grade III or IV thrombocytopenia developed in two patients. In contrast, among the paclitaxel/carboplatin group, grade III or IV neutropenia developed in only three patients (p < 0.05) and grade III or IV thrombocytopenia developed in two patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gastrointestinal or renal toxicity. In the paclitaxel/carboplatin group, 13 patients developed neuropathy compared to only 2 patients (10%) in the docetaxel/carboplatin group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the clinical response between the two treatment groups. In conclusion, neutropenia was more common with the docetaxel/carboplatin regimen, whereas neuropathy was more common in the paclitaxel-based regimen. The therapeutic efficacy was equivalent between the two groups.

Chemotherapy for newly diagnosed and relapsed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To review chemotherapy options for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed advanced ovarian cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature.

CONCLUSION

Primary chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer consisting of a platinum compound and a taxane is commonly associated with myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and sensory/motor neuropathy. For recurrent disease, numerous chemotherapy agents are effective, including rechallenging the patient with a platinum and/or a taxane or using newer agents such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, and gemcitabine. In platinum-resistant disease, selection is based mainly on the toxicity profile, because palliation and quality of life are important.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses play a valuable role in ovarian cancer care by proactively meeting patient information needs.

European experience of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer

The combination of docetaxel with cisplatin in gastric cancer is a promising development. In a phase II study, 85-100 mg/m2 docetaxel plus 75 mg/m2 cisplatin was established as an active regimen in advanced gastric cancer (with an overall response rate of 56%) with a manageable safety profile. Up to 300 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by continuous infusion for 2 of 3 weeks can be added to this regimen without an increase in appreciable toxicity. The efficacy of docetaxel-based regimens remains to be established by a randomized phase III study. However, the results of such trials are eagerly awaited, as are data from studies of docetaxel-based combinations in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

Phase II clinical trial of carboplatin and docetaxel in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer: active combination with low incidence of peripheral neuropathy

During the past 2 decades there have been chemotherapeutic advances in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, new drug combinations aimed at increasing response and survival and decreasing toxicities are under investigation. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 in combination with Carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6, as first line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. 37 patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were entered, and are currently evaluable for response and toxicity. Treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade III and IV toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 16.2%. Grade II and III sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 8.1% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy resolved in two patients and persisted for more than 10 months in one patient. An overall clinical response of 89% was documented (95% CI 74.5% to 96.9%). Carboplatin and docetaxel administered according to our protocol is an effective alternative to other existing platinum-taxane based combinations. This treatment is associated with low incidence of sensory peripheral neuropathy, which is generally associated with better patient compliance and quality of life.

Natural product inhibitors of ovarian neoplasia

The present work constitutes a review of the literature on natural products with potential antitumor activity against ovarian neoplasias. The review refers to five plant extracts and sixty-nine compounds isolated from higher plants and microorganisms, which are classified in appropriate chemical groups and model tested, and cites their activity. Some aspects of recent research with natural products directed to ward producing drugs which are inhibitors of ovarian neoplasia are discussed.

A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel is an inhibitor of microtubule depolymerization and has demonstrated activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer and gynecologic cancer. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma to determine its activity, and nature and degree of toxicity, in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, defined as progression while on or within 6 months of therapy, were eligible if they had measurable disease and had not received more than one chemotherapy regimen. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) was administered iv over 1 h every 21 days. A prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid was begun 24 h before docetaxel administration and continued for 48 h thereafter. Hepatic function was strictly monitored.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were entered and treated with a total of 256 courses, with all 60 evaluable for toxicity and 58 evaluable for response. Responses were observed in 22.4% of patients, with 5.2% achieving complete response and 17.2% achieving partial response (95% CI, 12.5-35.3%). The median duration of response was 2.5 months. The likelihood of observing a response did not appear to be related to the length of the prior paclitaxel-free interval or duration of prior paclitaxel infusions. The principal adverse effect of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 75% of patients. There was one treatment-related death. Dose reductions were required in 36% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel is active in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal cancer but, in view of significant hematologic toxicity, further study is warranted to ascertain its optimal dose and schedule.

Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin for chemo-naive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

We conducted a study of docetaxel-carboplatin combination therapy to confirm the efficacy and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive patients with ovarian cancer. Docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-vs.-time curve of 5) were administered consecutively on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for five planned cycles in chemo-naive patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC to IV ovarian cancer with or without successful cytoreductive surgery at staging laparotomy. Twenty-six patients (median age, 53 years; range, 34-76 years) were enrolled into this trial at Niigata University Hospital. The major toxicity with this regimen was neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were 27% (7/26) and 69% (18/26), respectively. However, the neutropenia was brief and reversible with G-CSF support. Nausea/emesis, fatigue, arthralgia/myalgias, and alopecia were the most common nonhematologic toxicities, in which no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed. Neurotoxicity was infrequently observed. Nine of 11 assessable patients responded to the regimen. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin and docetaxel seems to be highly active in ovarian cancer with the major toxicity of neutropenia, and the extremely low incidence of clinically significant neurotoxicity. Randomized controlled clinical trials should be conducted to define a role for this regimen in ovarian cancer.

Does the interval from primary surgery to chemotherapy influence progression-free survival in ovarian cancer?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether the length of the interval from primary surgery to commencement of chemotherapy has any direct effect on progression-free survival in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The progression-free survival of 472 patients enrolled in four trials who had all received platinum-containing chemotherapy (either in combination with a taxane or cyclophospamide) was subjected to univariate analysis. Dividing subjects into those above and below the median interval from surgery to chemotherapy formed two groups for analysis. The analysis was stratified by study and arm/cohort within study to remove any possible influence of the different studies and study doses. Multivariate analysis was then performed including stage, bulk of residual disease, and performance status as well as interval to starting chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median interval from surgery to chemotherapy was 22 days (range 7-100). Univariate analysis of the above median and below median groups showed worse progression-free survival for those with earlier treatment (hazard ratio 0.84, P = 0.14, 95% CI 0.67-1.06); however, those treated earlier tended to have bulkier residual disease (>2 cm; P = 0.006). When multivariate analysis was performed incorporating residual disease status, FIGO stage, and performance status, the hazard rate ratio for interval to surgery was 0.99 (P = 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the interval from surgery to commencement of chemotherapy is not an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival.

A dose-finding study of carboplatin-epirubicin-docetaxel in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

The docetaxel-carboplatin combination is active and well tolerated in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. We added epirubicin to this combination to investigate additional benefits of anthracyclines in epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty-one patients, FIGO Ic-IV, performance status 0-1, were treated in four dose cohorts. Docetaxel was fixed at 75 mg m(-2), carboplatin doses were AUC 4-5 and epirubicin doses were 50-60 mg m(-2). Drugs were given on day 1, every 3 weeks, except in cohort 3, where epirubicin was given on day 8. Dexamethasone was given prophylactically. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred in cohorts 1, 2 and 4, two occurred in cohort 3. Complicated neutropenia occurred in two patients in cohorts 1 and 2 and one patient in cohorts 3 and 4. Two patients experienced grade III diarrhoea or stomatitis in cohort 1 and two in cohort 3. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade II sensory neuropathy occurred in one patient. No cardiac toxicity or significant oedema was observed. The overall response rate was 36%, and 62% were CA125 responders. The predefined maximum tolerated dose was exceeded in cohort 3. The cohort 4 dose level (epirubicin 50 mg m(-2), carboplatin AUC 4, docetaxel 75 mg m(-2)), warrants further study.

The integration of docetaxel into first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Docetaxel is being explored as an alternative to paclitaxel in the treatment of ovarian cancer for several reasons: a) evidence of superiority in preclinical models; b) at least comparable activity in platinum-refractory patients (28% response rate in four pooled Phase II trials), together with activity (23% response rate) in paclitaxel-refractory patients; c) indirect evidence of superiority in breast cancer; d) easier administration, i.e., 1 h q3 week schedule vs. 3 or 24 h infusions; and e) potentially superior toxicity profile, particularly regarding neurotoxicity. The Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG) has performed successive first-line feasibility trials of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin (100 patients) and carboplatin (141 patients). For docetaxel/carboplatin, a regimen of 75 mg/m2 and AUC 5 proved optimal. Over 90% of patients completed six cycles, q3 weekly, and toxicity was very acceptable; a low level of neurotoxicity (5%) was particularly noteworthy, since levels of over 30% are regularly reported for paclitaxel-carboplatin. Activity comparable to paclitaxel-carboplatin (median progression free survival of 16 months) therefore justified a randomized comparison between the two regimens (with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in 3 h and carboplatin AUC 5). This has now been completed, with 1077 patients (FIGO stage IC-IV disease) randomized, from 83 centers in 10 countries. Accrual was accomplished in 17 months (October 1998 to May 2000). A toxicity analysis has been completed, since the last patient finished treatment in October 2000. Treatment was delivered as prescribed (6 cycles) in a similar number of patients (79-84%). Significant differences in toxicity were seen, and this analysis together with response data is scheduled for presentation at the May 2001 ASCO meeting.