1
|
Kwong FL, Kristunas C, Davenport C, Aggarwal R, Deeks J, Mallett S, Kehoe S, Timmerman D, Bourne T, Stobart H, Neal R, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Sturdy L, Ottridge R, Sundar S. Investigating harms of testing for ovarian cancer - psychological outcomes and cancer conversion rates in women with symptoms of ovarian cancer: A cohort study embedded in the multicentre ROCkeTS prospective diagnostic study. BJOG 2024. [PMID: 38556698 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate psychological correlates in women referred with suspected ovarian cancer via the fast-track pathway, explore how anxiety and distress levels change at 12 months post-testing, and report cancer conversion rates by age and referral pathway. DESIGN Single-arm prospective cohort study. SETTING Multicentre. Secondary care including outpatient clinics and emergency admissions. POPULATION A cohort of 2596 newly presenting symptomatic women with a raised CA125 level, abnormal imaging or both. METHODS Women completed anxiety and distress questionnaires at recruitment and at 12 months for those who had not undergone surgery or a biopsy within 3 months of recruitment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Anxiety and distress levels measured using a six-item short form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) and the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-r) questionnaire. Ovarian cancer (OC) conversion rates by age, menopausal status and referral pathway. RESULTS Overall, 1355/2596 (52.1%) and 1781/2596 (68.6%) experienced moderate-to-severe distress and anxiety, respectively, at recruitment. Younger age and emergency presentations had higher distress levels. The clinical category for anxiety and distress remained unchanged/worsened in 76% of respondents at 12 months, despite a non-cancer diagnosis. The OC rates by age were 1.6% (95% CI 0.5%-5.9%) for age <40 years and 10.9% (95% CI 8.7%-13.6%) for age ≥40 years. In women referred through fast-track pathways, 3.3% (95% CI 1.9%-5.7%) of pre- and 18.5% (95% CI 16.1%-21.0%) of postmenopausal women were diagnosed with OC. CONCLUSIONS Women undergoing diagnostic testing display severe anxiety and distress. Younger women are especially vulnerable and should be targeted for support. Women under the age of 40 years have low conversion rates and we advocate reducing testing in this group to reduce the harms of testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fong Lien Kwong
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Caroline Kristunas
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Clare Davenport
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ridhi Aggarwal
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jon Deeks
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sue Mallett
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- St Peter's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Richard Neal
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Gentry-Maharaj
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lauren Sturdy
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ryan Ottridge
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Fotopoulou C, Creutzberg C, Mutch D, Gaffney D, Lindemann K, Kehoe S, Berek JS. Response: FIGO staging of endometrial cancer 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 164:369-372. [PMID: 38055215 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U. de Bellvitge and Hospital U. Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El-Tawab SS, Kehoe S. Synchronous ovarian and Bartholin gland carcinoma: Case report and review of literature. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 163:744-746. [PMID: 37221998 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of synchronous ovarian and vulva (Bartholin gland) cancer. A postmenopausal woman presented with a complex multiloculated left adnexal mass and 2-cm right Bartholin gland mass. CA 125 was 59 IU/mL. Computed tomography of chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed a very large (32 × 13.5 × 22.5 cm) complex mass arising from the pelvis and extending to the level of the T12/L1 disk space. A right Bartholin mass with suspicious right inguinal nodes was seen. Midline laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy, infracolic omentectomy, pelvic peritoneal biopsies, and peritoneal washings were carried out. Wide local excision of the right Bartholin gland mass was carried out in the same setting. Histopathology came back as Stage 2B left ovarian clear-cell carcinoma and synchronous right Bartholin gland adenoid cystic carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion, incompletely excised, staged at least FIGO Stage 1B. Following local multidisciplinary team discussion and positron emission tomography scan review, the local committee agreed to start three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy then proceed with Bartholin gland scar re-excision and bilateral groin lymph node dissection. After the three cycles, the groin lymph nodes came back as metastatic adenocarcinoma with overall morphologic and immunohistochemical features consistent with metastatic ovarian clear-cell carcinoma. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Initial follow-up period over 9 months was uneventful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally S El-Tawab
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- ElShatby Maternity University Hospital, Gynecology Oncology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nistor S, El-Tawab S, Wong F, Zouridis A, Roux R, Manek S, Gaitskell K, Ahmed AA, Kehoe S, Soleymani majd H. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of primary expansile vs. infiltrative mucinous ovarian adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study sharing the experience of a tertiary centre. Transl Cancer Res 2023; 12:2682-2692. [PMID: 37969399 PMCID: PMC10643958 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs) are rare ovarian tumours accounting for 3% of all epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs). They are either expansile or infiltrative, based on the tumour's histological pattern of invasion. MOCs have a distinct molecular profile, natural history, chemo-sensitivity, and prognosis compared to other EOCs. The aim of this study was to describe patient and tumour characteristics, as well as survival outcomes of expansile and infiltrative primary MOCs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary cancer centre. Patients had surgery for primary MOC between Jul 1, 2010 and Oct 28, 2022. All patients discussed at the Oxford multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting with a diagnosis of MOC were included. We excluded patients with mucinous metastatic carcinoma (MMC), dual histological diagnoses, those who died before treatment was initiated, and patients with incomplete records. Results A total of 47 patients were identified and 14 were excluded. Out of the remaining 33 MOCs, 23 (70.6%) were expansile and 10 (30.4%) were infiltrative. The median follow-up was 37 months (95% CI: 14.1-69.8). Patients with infiltrative tumours were older than those with expansile tumours (median age 62 vs. 55 years, P=0.049). Infiltrative tumours were diagnosed at a more advanced International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage compared to expansile tumours: FIGO stage II/III 50% vs. 8.2% (P=0.002). We found paired-box gene 8 (PAX8) more frequently expressed in expansile tumours (75% vs. 37.5%, P=0.099). Adjuvant treatment was administered in 50% of patients with infiltrative disease, compared to only 13% of those with expansile disease (P=0.036). 80% of patients who have relapsed had received adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to 17.2% of patients without relapse (P=0.012). At 3 years, there was a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (94.7% vs. 65.6%, P=0.02) between the expansile and infiltrative groups, but no difference in overall survival (OS) (88.8% vs. 90%, P=0.875). Conclusions Patients with infiltrative tumours were older, more likely to have bilateral tumours and more likely to have an advanced FIGO stage at diagnosis. Adjuvant treatment was more likely to be administered to patients with infiltrative tumours, however, this did not prevent relapse. PFS at 3 years was significantly higher in patients with expansile tumours. PAX8 was more frequently expressed by expansile tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Nistor
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally El-Tawab
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, El Shatby Maternity University Hospital, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Flora Wong
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Andreas Zouridis
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rene Roux
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sanjiv Manek
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Kezia Gaitskell
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ahmed Ashour Ahmed
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Hooman Soleymani majd
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pappa C, Le Thanh V, Smyth SL, Zouridis A, Kashif A, Sadeghi N, Sattar A, Damato S, Abdalla M, Laganà AS, Ferrari F, Kehoe S, Addley S, Soleymani majd H. Mixed Endometrial Epithelial Carcinoma: Epidemiology, Treatment and Survival Rates-A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study from a Single Institution. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6373. [PMID: 37835017 PMCID: PMC10573791 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mixed endometrial carcinoma (MEEC) refers to rare endometrial tumours that are composed of two or more distinct histotypes, at least one of which is serous or clear cell. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology, treatment outcomes and survival rates of patients with mixed endometrial carcinoma. The medical records of 34 patients diagnosed with MEEC between March 2010 and January 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological variables and treatment strategies were assessed, and overall survival and disease-free survival rates were evaluated. The histology of endometrioid and serous component was found in 26 (76.5%) patients, followed by serous and clear-cell components (5/34, 14.5%) and mixed endometrioid serous and clear-cell components (3/34, 8.8%). The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 52-84), and the median follow-up time was 55 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and the 5-year overall survival were 50.4% and 52.4%, respectively. Advanced disease stage was identified as an independent predictor of inferior disease-free (<0.003) and overall survival (p < 0.001). Except for stage, none of the traditional prognostic factors was associated with disease recurrence or death from disease. MEECs represent rare high-risk endometrial carcinomas with significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. Undoubtedly, the implementation of a molecular analysis can offer further diagnostic and management insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Pappa
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Valentina Le Thanh
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Sarah Louise Smyth
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Andreas Zouridis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Ammara Kashif
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Negin Sadeghi
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Alisha Sattar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Stephen Damato
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Mostafa Abdalla
- Gynaecology—Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25136 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Susan Addley
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, UK;
| | - Hooman Soleymani majd
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; (C.P.); (V.L.T.); (A.Z.); (A.K.); (S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies. METHODS The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system. RESULTS Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut). SUMMARY The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S, Lindemann K, Mutch D, Concin N. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 162:383-394. [PMID: 37337978 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 104.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies. METHODS The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system. RESULTS Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut ). SUMMARY The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zouridis A, Zarrindej K, Rencher J, Pappa C, Kashif A, Smyth SL, Sadeghi N, Sattar A, Damato S, Ferrari F, Laganà AS, Abdalla M, Kehoe S, Addley S, Soleymani Majd H. The Prognostic Characteristics and Recurrence Patterns of High Grade Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: A Large Retrospective Analysis of a Tertiary Center. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093141. [PMID: 37176582 PMCID: PMC10179027 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
High grade endometrioid endometrial cancer (HGEEC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with unclear prognostic features. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence and mortality and to describe the recurrence patterns of HGEEC. Ninety-six consecutive cases of HGEEC treated with primary surgery in a single Tertiary Center were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological and treatment details were recorded, and all patients were closely followed up. Disease-free, overall and cancer-specific survival rates were 83.8%, 77.8% and 83.6%, respectively. Cervical stromal involvement was independently related to recurrence (HR = 25.67; 95%CI 2.95-223.30; p = 0.003) and cancer-related death (HR = 15.39; 95%CI 1.29-183.43; p = 0.031) after adjusting for other pathological and treatment variables. Recurrence rate was 16%, with 60% of these cases having lung metastases and only one case with single vaginal vault recurrence. 81.81% of the recurrences presented with symptoms and not a single recurrence was diagnosed in routine follow-up clinical examination. In conclusion, the recurrence pattern may suggest that patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) could be considered a potential alternative to clinical-based follow-up for HGEEC survivors, especially for patients without cervical involvement and after two years from treatment. Additional caution is needed in patients with cervical stromal involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Zouridis
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | | | - Joshua Rencher
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading RG1 5AN, UK
| | - Christina Pappa
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Ammara Kashif
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | | | - Negin Sadeghi
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Alisha Sattar
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Stephen Damato
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25136 Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Mostafa Abdalla
- Gynaecology-Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Susan Addley
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
El-Tawab SS, Fox J, Trent S, Kehoe S. Cervical cancer during the covid pandemic: Are patients presenting with more advanced or larger tumours? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 283:95-99. [PMID: 36822124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Concerns were raised by clinicians at the Oxford Gynaecological Cancer MDT that there was an increasing number of women presenting with large cervical tumours requiring chemo-radiotherapy, possibly due to delays associated with the COVID pandemic. This audit was undertaken to assess whether this was a real event. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study collated the data from the central pathology service covering Oxfordshire, in the Oxford Gynaecological cancer centre. The control population consisted of patients treated during the 2 years pre-pandemic (1st Jan 2018-31 Dec 2019) and the study group the 2-year pandemic period (1st Jan 2020 until 31st December 2021). A total of 153 patients (74 control and 79 study) were diagnosed of cervical cancer during the study period. Variables included in the analysis were age, pathway of referral and diagnosis (cytology or clinical), FIGO stage, tumour histology, tumour size (using maximum diameter on MRI) and treatment. Student's t-test was used for continuous and discrete variables, respectively. The X2 test was used for the statistical analysis of proportions. RESULTS There was no statistically significant differences was noted in the referral pathways during both periods. Statistically significant stage migration from FIGO stage II to III was detected (p < 0.05), though no statistically significant change in tumour size. However, the pattern of tumour volume on case-to-case comparison elicited more cases with larger volumes during the pandemic periods. CONCLUSIONS Referral pathways of diagnosed cancer cervix was not affected during the pandemic in Oxfordshire. Therapeutic treatment numbers were unchanged - but some changes in tumour volume were likely the reason for the impression more such cases. Whether the stage shift noted here is representative of the wider population requires further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally S El-Tawab
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom; Elshatby Maternity University Hospital, Gynaecology Oncology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Julia Fox
- Consultant Biomedical Scientist, Cellular Pathology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| | - Sally Trent
- Clinical Oncology Department, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom.
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9 DU, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oxley S, Kalra A, Sideris M, Itzkowitz N, Evans O, Atakpa EC, Brentnall AR, Dworschak N, Gaba F, Gabe R, Sundar S, Wood N, Nicum S, Taylor A, Dobbs S, McCluggage WG, Nordin A, Legood R, Kehoe S, Ghaem-Maghami S, Manchanda R. Impact of Multiple COVID-19 Waves on Gynaecological Cancer Services in the UK. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041273. [PMID: 36831615 PMCID: PMC9953843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the impact of multiple COVID-19 waves on UK gynaecological-oncology services. METHODS An online survey was distributed to all UK-British-Gynaecological-Cancer-Society members during three COVID-19 waves from 2020 to2022. RESULTS In total, 51 hospitals (including 32 cancer centres) responded to Survey 1, 42 hospitals (29 centres) to Survey 2, and 39 hospitals (30 centres) to Survey 3. During the first wave, urgent referrals reportedly fell by a median of 50% (IQR = 25-70%). In total, 49% hospitals reported reduced staffing, and the greatest was noted for trainee doctors, by a median of 40%. Theatre capacity was reduced by a median of 40%. A median of 30% of planned operations was postponed. Multidisciplinary meetings were completely virtual in 39% and mixed in 65% of the total. A median of 75% of outpatient consultations were remote. By the second wave, fewer hospitals reported staffing reductions, and there was a return to pre-pandemic urgent referrals and multidisciplinary workloads. Theatre capacity was reduced by a median of 10%, with 5% of operations postponed. The third wave demonstrated worsening staff reductions similar to Wave 1, primarily from sickness. Pre-pandemic levels of urgent referrals/workload continued, with little reduction in surgical capacity. CONCLUSION COVID-19 led to a significant disruption of gynaecological-cancer care across the UK, including reduced staffing, urgent referrals, theatre capacity, and working practice changes. Whilst disruption eased and referrals/workloads returned to normal, significant staff shortages remained in 2022, highlighting persistent capacity constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Nicole Itzkowitz
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Emma Christine Atakpa
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Adam R. Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Nina Dworschak
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Nick Wood
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Institute of Cancer Research, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | | | - Stephen Dobbs
- Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| | - W. Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Andy Nordin
- East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate CT9 4AN, UK
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lowe-Zinola J, Williamson M, Gaunt E, Boulter H, Pounds R, Kehoe S, Yap J. Evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tertiary gynaecological cancer care delivery: a population based study. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:3692-3700. [PMID: 36469698 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2153296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, reports of delays and alterations in cancer treatment pathways have emerged. We aim to evaluate the proportional impact of the pandemic over time on standard care delivery in a large tertiary gynaecological cancer centre. Consecutive patient records from weekly multidisciplinary team meetings were collected prospectively between 6 March 2020 and 26 March 2021. In total, 1943 patient discussions were held in our multidisciplinary team meetings during the study period, with 2.1% standard management decisions being altered due to the pandemic, the majority of which occurred during the first wave. Amongst alterations, 87.5% were deferral of surgery, and, in 62.5% of cases, were due to reduced critical care capacity. The majority of patients were offered alternative treatment, and surgery once resources permitted. During subsequent waves of COVID-19, with similar reductions in critical care capacity, we demonstrate avoidance of a second major increase in standard care pathway alterations.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known about the subject? Recent evidence has demonstrated significant delays to cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have objectively evaluated the quantity and nature of deviations from both surgical and non-surgical standard gynaecological cancer care pathways.What the results of this study add? We examined in detail the effects of the pandemic on tertiary gynaecological cancer service delivery in our centre. The main impact was in the ability to perform major surgery due to reduced critical care capacity. However, with the majority of standard care alterations clustered during the first wave of the pandemic, we demonstrate how the implementation of a COVID-19 mitigation plan minimised service disruption during subsequent waves.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study reinforces the importance of protecting gynaecological cancer services during situations where resources are limited. Having identified several key factors affected by the pandemic, we hope that our results will support others in coordinating responses to similar scenarios in future. Having not examined the effects of the pandemic on primary and secondary level cancer services, further research will be needed to evaluate the overall impact on long term patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Lowe-Zinola
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Megan Williamson
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ellen Gaunt
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Holly Boulter
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rachel Pounds
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Gynaecological Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
- St Peter’s College, Oxford, UK
| | - Jason Yap
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Strojna AN, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, Angeles MA, Bizzarri N, van Ramshorst GH, Theofanakis C, Bilir E, Razumova Z, Nikolova T, Selcuk I, Wan YLL, Zalewski K, Lanner M, Pletnev A, Pareja R, Fotopoulou C, Kehoe S, Bąk J, Ramirez PT. ENYGO-IJGC scientific writing and publication course: 2021 meeting summary. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1599-1605. [PMID: 36418053 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Natalia Strojna
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Kliniken Essen-Mitte Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH Klinik fur Gynakologie & Gynakologische Onkologie, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | | | - Martina Aida Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Charlampos Theofanakis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, General Hospital of Athens Alexandra, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Esra Bilir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Global Health, Koc University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zoia Razumova
- Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tanja Nikolova
- Klinikum Mittelbaden, Academic Teaching Hospital of Heidelberg University, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | - Ilker Selcuk
- Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Cankaya, Turkey
| | - Yee-Loi Louise Wan
- Gynaecological Oncology, The University of Manchester Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Kamil Zalewski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Holycross, Poland.,Department of Gynaecology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Gynaecology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Department of Gynaecology, Private Hospital Villach, Villach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Andrei Pletnev
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica ASTORGA, Medellin, and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia, Medellin, Colombia
| | | | - Sean Kehoe
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Janina Bąk
- https://janinadaily.com, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Biswas DD, Strickland LM, Dhindsa JS, Shi Y, Sethi R, Kehoe S, Lai EX, Huston ML, Scarrow ER, ElMallah MK. Accumulation of pathological Ataxin‐7 in the medulla leads to hypoglossal (XII) motor unit pathology. FASEB J 2022. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.r2442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital Oxford and University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,St Peter's College, Oxford, UK
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wilailak S, Kengsakul M, Kehoe S. Worldwide initiatives to eliminate cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1:102-106. [PMID: 34669201 PMCID: PMC9298014 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
In 2020, more than 600 000 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 342 000 women died worldwide. Without comprehensive control, rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality are expected to worsen. In 2020, the World Health Organization adopted the global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer to the threshold of four cases per 100 000 women within the 21st century, using a triple pillar intervention strategy comprising 90% of girls fully vaccinated by the age of 15 years, 70% of women screened by the age of 35 years and again by 45 years, and 90% of women with precancer treated and 90% of women with invasive cancer managed. In countries with high cervical cancer incidence, a tremendous effort will be needed to overcome the challenges. This article discusses the efforts in place to accelerate achievement of this ambitious goal. A triple pillar intervention strategy of vaccination, screening, and timely treatment has been adopted to guide the global ambition to eliminate cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarikapan Wilailak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Malika Kengsakul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynecological Cancer Center, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.,St Peter's College, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kehoe S, Jewgenow K, Johnston PR, Braun BC. Early preantral follicles of the domestic cat express gonadotropin and sex steroid signalling potential. Biol Reprod 2021; 106:95-107. [PMID: 34672344 DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioab192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Key biomolecular processes which regulate primordial ovarian follicle dormancy and early folliculogenesis in mammalian ovaries are not fully understood. The domestic cat is a useful model to study ovarian folliculogenesis and is the most relevant for developing in vitro growth methods to be implemented in wild felid conservation breeding programs. Previously, RNA-sequencing of primordial, primary, and secondary follicle samples from domestic cat implicated ovarian steroidogenesis and steroid reception during follicle development. Here we aimed to identify which sex steroid biosynthesis and metabolism enzymes, gonadotropin receptors, and sex steroid receptors are present and may be potential regulators. Differential gene expression, functional annotation, and enrichment analyses were employed and protein localisation was studied too. Gene transcripts for PGR, PGRMC1, AR (steroid receptors), CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HSD17B1 and HSD17B17 (steroidogenic enzymes), and STS (steroid metabolising enzyme) were significantly differentially expressed (Q values of ≤0.05). Differential gene expression increased in all transcripts during follicle transitions apart from AR which decreased by the secondary stage. Immunohistochemistry localised FSHR and LHCGR to oocytes at each stage. PGRMC1 immunostaining was strongest in granulosa cells whereas AR was strongest in oocytes throughout each stage. Protein signals for steroidogenic enzymes were only detectable in secondary follicles. Products of these significantly differentially expressed genes may regulate domestic cat preantral folliculogenesis. In vitro growth could be optimised as all early follicles express gonadotropin and steroid receptors meaning hormone interaction and response may be possible. Protein expression analyses of early secondary follicles supported its potential for producing sex steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kehoe
- Department of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Jewgenow
- Department of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - P R Johnston
- Berlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research BeGenDiv; Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries; and Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - B C Braun
- Department of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
In 2014, FIGO's Committee for Gynecologic Oncology revised the staging of ovarian cancer, incorporating ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer into the same system. Most of these malignancies are high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Stage IC is now divided into three categories: IC1 (surgical spill); IC2 (capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface); and IC3 (malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings). The updated staging includes a revision of Stage IIIC based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes alone without intraperitoneal dissemination. This category is now subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension), and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension). Stage IIIA2 is now "microscopic extrapelvic peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph node" metastasis. This review summarizes the genetics, surgical management, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies for epithelial cancers, and the treatment of ovarian germ cell and stromal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S. Berek
- Stanford Women’s Cancer CenterStanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Malte Renz
- Stanford Women’s Cancer CenterStanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynecological Cancer CenterChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
- St Peter’s CollegeOxfordUK
| | - Lalit Kumar
- Department of Medical OncologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Royal Hospital for WomenSydneyAustralia
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Olawaiye AB, Cotler J, Cuello MA, Bhatla N, Okamoto A, Wilailak S, Purandare CN, Lindeque G, Berek JS, Kehoe S. FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155:43-47. [PMID: 34520062 PMCID: PMC9290586 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
To revise the FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva using a new approach that involves analyses of prospectively collected data. The FIGO Committee for Gynecologic Oncology reviewed the recent literature to gain an insight into the impact of the 2009 vulvar cancer staging revision. The Committee resolved to revise the staging with a goal of simplification and actively collaborated with the United States National Cancer Database to analyze prospectively collected data on carcinoma of the vulva. Many tumor characteristics were collected for all stages of vulvar cancer treated between 2010 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS software. Overall survival was estimated based on tumor characteristics. Log‐rank and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze overall survival similarities between and within groups of tumor characteristics. Characteristics with similar survivals were then grouped into the same stages and substages. Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves were generated for the resulting stages and substages. There were 12 063 cases with available data. The resulting new staging for carcinoma of the vulva has two substages in Stage I, no substage in Stage II, three substages in Stage III, and two substages in Stage IV. The Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves showed clear separation between stages and substages. The 2021 vulvar cancer staging is the first from the FIGO Committee for Gynecologic Oncology to be derived from data analyses. This revision has a new definition for depth of invasion, uses the same definition for lymph node metastases utilized in cervical cancer, and allows findings from cross‐sectional imaging to be incorporated into vulvar cancer staging. The 2021 FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva is data‐derived, validated, and much simpler than earlier revisions. The FIGO Committee for Gynecologic Oncology's last revision of vulvar cancer staging was published over a decade ago. This 2021 revision is data‐derived, simplified, and user‐friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander B Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph Cotler
- National Cancer Database, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mauricio A Cuello
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sarikapan Wilailak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Gerhard Lindeque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynecological Cancer Center, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.,St Peter's College, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cabasag CJ, Arnold M, Piñeros M, Morgan E, Brierley J, Hofferkamp J, Kehoe S, Butler J, Bucher O, Bray F, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM. Population-based cancer staging for oesophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer 2012-2014: International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership SurvMark-2. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1239-1246. [PMID: 33990959 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Cancer stage at diagnosis is important information for management and treatment of individual patients as well as in epidemiological studies to evaluate effectiveness of health care system in managing cancer patients. Population-based studies to examine international disparities on cancer survival by stage, however, has been challenging due to the lack of international standardization on recording stage information and variation in stage completeness across regions and countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) previously assessed the availability and comparability of staging information for colorectal, lung, female breast and ovarian cancers. Stage conversion algorithms were developed to aggregate and map all stage information into a single staging system to allow international comparison by stage at diagnosis. In this article, we developed stage conversion algorithms for three additional cancers, namely oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers. We examined all stage information available, evaluated stage completeness, applied each stage conversion algorithm, and assessed the magnitude of misclassification using data from six Canadian cancer registries (Alberta, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Saskatchewan). In addition, we discussed five recommendations for registries to improve international cancer survival comparison by stage: (a) improve collection and completeness of staging data; (b) promote a comparable definition for stage at diagnosis; (c) promote the use of a common stage classification system; (d) record versions of staging classifications and (e) use multiple data sources for valid staging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Citadel J Cabasag
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Melina Arnold
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Eileen Morgan
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - James Brierley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jim Hofferkamp
- North American Association of Central Registries, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Butler
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK, London, UK
| | - Oliver Bucher
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - D Maxwell Parkin
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Nuffield Department of Population Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coleridge SL, Bryant A, Kehoe S, Morrison J. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD005343. [PMID: 34328210 PMCID: PMC8406953 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005343.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require a combination of surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery. OBJECTIVES To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)). SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to 9 October 2020: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial. We extracted data of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, surgically-related mortality and morbidity and quality of life outcomes. We used GRADE methods to determine the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We identified 2227 titles and abstracts through our searches, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1774 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the four studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.08; participants = 1692; studies = 4; high-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (Hazard Ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08; participants = 1692; studies = 4; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were variably and incompletely reported across studies. There are probably clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to overall postoperative serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+): 6% in NACT group, versus 29% in PDS group, (risk ratio (RR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.38; participants = 435; studies = 2; heterogeneity index (I2) = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). NACT probably results in a large reduction in the need for stoma formation: 5.9% in NACT group, versus 20.4% in PDS group, (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.74; participants = 632; studies = 2; I2 = 70%; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably reduces the risk of needing bowel resection at the time of surgery: 13.0% in NACT group versus 26.6% in PDS group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79; participants = 1565; studies = 4; I2 = 79%; moderate-certainty evidence). NACT reduces postoperative mortality: 0.6% in NACT group, versus 3.6% in PDS group, (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.46; participants = 1623; studies = 5; I2 = 0%; high-certainty evidence). QoL on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in three studies (MD -0.29, 95% CI -2.77 to 2.20; participants = 524; studies = 3; I2 = 81%; very low-certainty evidence) but the evidence is very uncertain and should be interpreted with caution. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available high to moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT probably reduces the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and reduces the risk of postoperative mortality and the need for stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians (involving specialist gynaecological multidisciplinary teams) and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Coleridge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery. OBJECTIVES To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)). SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases on 11 February 2019: CENTRAL, Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial. MAIN RESULTS We found 1952 potential titles, with a most recent search date of February 2019, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1713 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the three studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (1521 women; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (1631 women; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.07; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were poorly and incompletely reported across studies. There may be clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+). These data suggest that NACT may reduce the risk of need for blood transfusion (risk ratio (RR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; four studies,1085 women; low-certainty evidence), venous thromboembolism (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.90; four studies, 1490 women; low-certainty evidence), infection (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.56; four studies, 1490 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to PDS. NACT probably reduces the need for stoma formation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; two studies, 581 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and bowel resection (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92; three studies, 1213 women; moderate-certainty evidence), as well as reducing postoperative mortality (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.54:five studies, 1571 women; moderate-certainty evidence). QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in two studies (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.32; participants = 307; very low-certainty evidence) and use of the QLQC-30 and QLQC-Ov28 in another study (MD 7.60, 95% CI 1.89 to 13.31; participants = 217; very low-certainty evidence) meant that little could be inferred. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT may reduce the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for bowel resection and stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Coleridge
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tranoulis A, Georgiou D, Montalto SA, Yap J, Twigg J, Buruiana F, Sundar S, Balega J, Singh K, Kehoe S. 318 One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA): a big ‘step’ towards a more accurate intra-operative assessment of sentinel lymph node status for early stage endometrial and cervical cancer? Diagnostics (Basel) 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-esgo.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Kehoe
- FIGO Gynaecological Cancer Committee, Institute of Cancer & Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Domogauer J, Duckworth T, Osterman S, Pothuri B, Boyd L, Salame G, Kehoe S, Schiff P, Lymberis S. Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Intracavitary Brachytherapy: Improving Toxicity and Precision of Tandem Applicator Placement in Cervical Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Dai D, Balega J, Sundar S, Kehoe S, Elattar A, Phillips A, Singh K. Serum Albumin as a Predictor of Survival after Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer (AOC): A Retrospective Study. J INVEST SURG 2020; 35:426-431. [PMID: 33021127 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1827314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of serum albumin (at diagnosis and pre-operatively) on survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer(AOC) and whether improvement in albumin achieved following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) affects overall survival (OS). METHODS Outcomes of 441 patients who underwent cytoreduction for AOC were reviewed. Albumin was recorded at diagnosis and pre-operatively. Further analysis was performed if patients were hypoalbuminaemic at diagnosis.Analysis was stratified according to whether the patientreceived primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery (IDS) and if their albumin was corrected. RESULTS 308 patients had a serum albumin level at diagnosis and 400 patients had a pre-operative albumin available for analysis. For patients with an albumin at diagnosis ≤ 35g/L and ≥36 g/L, median OS was 31.5 (95% CI 23.5-39.5) and 50.4 (95% CI 38.9-61.9) months respectively (P = 0.003). Followingmultivariate analysis (MVA), albumin at diagnosis remained statistically significant as an independent marker for survival, even after adjusting for cytoreductive outcome, stage and grade(p = 0.04, Hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.89).Hypoalbuminaemic patients at diagnosis achieved complete cytoreduction in 53% of cases.For PDS patients, median OS was 19.7 months (95% CI 11.5-27.9). For IDS patients, median OS was 27.9 months (n = 1).IDS patients with a corrected albumin had a median OS of 42.9 months (95% CI 31.5-54.3) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Hypoalbuminaemia at diagnosis is a poor prognostic factor in AOC. Normalization of serum albumin after NACT is a potential predictor of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dairui Dai
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Janos Balega
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Elattar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Kavita Singh
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kehoe S, Bhatla N. FIGO
stage
IIB
cervical cancer prognostication in low‐resource settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 149:254. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Kehoe
- St Peter's College University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Searle G, Pounds R, Phillips A, Kehoe S, Balega J, Singh K, Yap J. Prolonged interruption of chemotherapy in patients undergoing delayed debulking surgery for advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer is associated with a worse prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:54-58. [PMID: 32345546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current standard of care for advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) comprises a combination of debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. In the neoadjuvant setting, patients usually undergo 3 cycles of chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS), then 3 further cycles of chemotherapy. However, the optimum timeframe to administer chemotherapy before and after ICS remains unclear. We therefore examine the survival impact of the interval between pre- and post-operative chemotherapy in patients undergoing ICS in a well-established patient cohort. Factors leading to "delays" in recommencing post-operative chemotherapy were also examined. METHODS The study comprises of a retrospective cohort of 205 cases with FIGO stage III and IV HGSC undergoing ICS. The duration of the interval between pre-operative and post-operative chemotherapy was correlated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were constructed to identify factors associated with survival and prolonged chemotherapy interruption. RESULTS The median interval between pre-operative and post-operative chemotherapy was 63 days. Multivariate analyses revealed macroscopic residual disease (HR:2.280, 95% CI:1.635-3.177, p ≤ 0.001) and interruption of chemotherapy >10 weeks (HR:1.65, 95%CI:1.201-2.290, p = 0.002) were associated with poorer OS. Existing medical comorbidities and longer hospital stay were independent prognostic factors for prolonging the chemotherapy interruption. CONCLUSION Our study recommends that interruption to chemotherapy to allow patients to undergo ICS should be ≤10 weeks; otherwise, OS is significantly impacted. Patients with pre-existing medical comorbidities should receive additional support pre- and post-operatively to keep the chemotherapy interruption to a minimum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Searle
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Pounds
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Phillips
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Royal Derby Hospital, Department of Gynaecology, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Janos Balega
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Kavita Singh
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Yap
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kehoe S. Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: reducing ureteric injuries. BJOG 2020; 127:866. [PMID: 32103568 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pounds R, O'Neill D, Subba K, Garg A, Scerif M, Leong E, Nevin J, Kehoe S, Yap J. The role of preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis and groin in the management of clinically early staged vulva squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:444-449. [PMID: 31987600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) commonly metastasises through groin lymphatics. However, the use of pre-operative imaging in detecting inguinal nodal metastasis before staging surgery or to triage patients for sentinel node biopsy remains unclear. Here, we investigated if pre-operative CT scan, the imaging choice in our cancer centre, influences the overall course of VSCC management in those patients without clinical evidence of groin lymphadenopathy. METHOD The study comprised of a prospective cohort of 225 patients with VSCC who underwent staging surgery within a regional tertiary gynaecological cancer centre. Comprehensive information of the cohort's demography, clinicopathological variables and outcome data were collected and analysed. Findings of pre-operative imaging were compared with histological findings of inguinal lymph nodes following groin lymphadenectomy. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V24. RESULTS Pre-operative CT scan was performed on 116 (56.6%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of cross-sectional imaging in detecting groin lymphatic metastasis were 59.1% and 77.8%, respectively; while the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 61.9% and 75.7%, respectively. In patients who had sentinel inguinal nodes biopsy, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CT scan in detecting inguinal node metastasis were 30.0%, 85.7%, 33.3% and 83.7%, respectively. There was no difference in disease-free and overall survival in those who received pre-operative imaging when compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION Pre-operative CT scan may be omitted in early stage VSCC prior to surgical staging as it does not affect overall management and surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Pounds
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle O'Neill
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Kamana Subba
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Akanksha Garg
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Miski Scerif
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Leong
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - James Nevin
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Yap
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Dental and Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Coleridge SL, Bryant A, Lyons TJ, Goodall RJ, Kehoe S, Morrison J. Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD005343. [PMID: 31684686 PMCID: PMC6822157 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005343.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery. OBJECTIVES To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)). SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases on 11 February 2019: CENTRAL, Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial. MAIN RESULTS We found 1952 potential titles, with a most recent search date of February 2019, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1713 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the three studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (1521 women; hazard ratio (HR) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.19, I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (1631 women; HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.13, I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were poorly and incompletely reported across studies. There may be clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+). These data suggest that NACT may reduce the risk of need for blood transfusion (risk ratio (RR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; four studies,1085 women; low-certainty evidence), venous thromboembolism (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.90; four studies, 1490 women; low-certainty evidence), infection (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.56; four studies, 1490 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to PDS. NACT probably reduces the need for stoma formation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; two studies, 581 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and bowel resection (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92; three studies, 1213 women; moderate-certainty evidence), as well as reducing postoperative mortality (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.54:five studies, 1571 women; moderate-certainty evidence). QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in two studies (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.32; participants = 307; very low-certainty evidence) and use of the QLQC-30 and QLQC-Ov28 in another study (MD 7.60, 95% CI 1.89 to 13.31; participants = 217; very low-certainty evidence) meant that little could be inferred. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT may reduce the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for bowel resection and stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Coleridge
- Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation TrustObstetrics and GynaecologyMusgrove Park HospitalTauntonUKTA1 5DA
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyMedical School New BuildRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Thomas J Lyons
- University of BristolSchool of Medical Sciences38 Kings Parade AvenueBristolUKBS8 2RB
| | - Richard J Goodall
- Imperial College LondonDepartment of Surgery and CancerKensingtonLondonUKSW7 2AZ
| | - Sean Kehoe
- University of BirminghamInstitute of Cancer and GenomicsBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - Jo Morrison
- Musgrove Park HospitalDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyTaunton and Somerset NHS Foundation TrustTauntonSomersetUKTA1 5DA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Phillips A, Kehoe S, Singh K, Elattar A, Nevin J, Balega J, Pounds R, Elmodir A, Pascoe J, Fernando I, Sundar S. Socioeconomic differences impact overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) prior to achievement of standard therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300:1261-1270. [PMID: 31414175 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05269-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Survival difference between socioeconomic groups with ovarian cancer has persisted in the United Kingdom despite efforts to reduce disparities in care. Our aim was to delineate critical episodes in the patient journey, where deprivation has most impact on survival. METHODS A retrospective review of 834 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) between 16/8/07-16/2/17 at a large cancer centre serving one of the most deprived areas of the UK. Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), patients were categorised into five groups. RESULTS Surgery was more common in less deprived patients (p < 0.00001). Across IMD groups, there were no differences in complete (R0) cytoreduction rate (r = 0.18, p > 0.05), age, or comorbidity. The R0/total cohort rate increased with increasing IMD group (p < 0.0001). Patients refusing any intervention belonged exclusively to the three most deprived groups; 5/7 patients who refused surgery belonged to the most deprived IMD group. Overall survival in the total patient group was less in IMD group 1-2 compared to 9-10 (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, IMD group was not an independent predictor of survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Socioeconomic differences in survival manifest in patients not receiving surgical treatment for AOC and are not purely explained by comorbidity, age, stage, or histological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK. .,Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Vincent Drive, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Kavita Singh
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | - Ahmed Elattar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | - James Nevin
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | - Janos Balega
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | - Rachel Pounds
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | - Ahmed Elmodir
- The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Jennifer Pascoe
- The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Indrajit Fernando
- The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Rd, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Vincent Drive, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kumar S, Long J, Kehoe S, Sundar S, Cummins C. Quality of life outcomes following surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:1285-1291. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundQuality of life after ovarian cancer treatment is an important goal for patients. Complex debulking surgeries and platinum based chemotherapy are often required but quality of life after surgery is rarely reported.ObjectivesTo describe quality of life outcomes after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in a systematic review and meta-analysis.Search strategyMEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through March 2019 with no language restrictions.Selection criteriaIncluded studies reported quality of life in women diagnosed with primary advanced ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing cytoreduction surgery.Data collection and analysisData on extent and timing of surgery, quality of life outcomes, and surgical complications were extracted and study quality assessed.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials comparing primary surgery to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had heterogeneous quality of life outcomes with no difference between arms, although there was a clinical improvement in global quality of life scores in both arms at 6 months compared with baseline. Data from two observational studies showed no meaningful difference in quality of life scores between patients undergoing standard or extensive surgery at 6 months.ConclusionsThere was no clinically important difference in the quality of life of patients undergoing either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There is insufficient evidence on quality of life outcomes of patients undergoing extensive or ultra-radical surgery compared with those undergoing less extensive surgery. Quality of life outcomes matter to patients, but there is little evidence to inform patient choice regarding the extent of surgery.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kehoe S. Surveillance and treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. Maturitas 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
34
|
Gore M, Hackshaw A, Brady WE, Penson RT, Zaino R, McCluggage WG, Ganesan R, Wilkinson N, Perren T, Montes A, Summers J, Lord R, Dark G, Rustin G, Mackean M, Reed N, Kehoe S, Frumovitz M, Christensen H, Feeney A, Ledermann J, Gershenson DM. An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:541-548. [PMID: 31005287 PMCID: PMC6559214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II–IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6 cycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12 cycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Results The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59 months. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p = 0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p = 0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p = 0.14); PFS HR = 0.62 (p = 0.40). Grade 3–4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms. Conclusion mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782. mEOC/GOG-0241 is one of the first international rare tumor trials. Oxaliplatin/capecitabine might be worth further study. Long-term follow-up is feasible in rare tumors. Challenges were lack of local resources and funding for experimental licenced therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Gore
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Richard Zaino
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Centre, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Nafisa Wilkinson
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ana Montes
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey Summers
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Rosemary Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graham Dark
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Amanda Feeney
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Henry C, Tonkopi E, O’Connell K, Westcott M, Lewandowski R, Liu D, Boyd D, Kehoe S, Gregoire M, Mawko G, Kappadath S, Syme A, Abraham R. Abstract No. 531 Novel radiopaque Yttrium-90 glass microspheres in a porcine model: clinical potential for real-time targeting and dosimetry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
36
|
Vergote I, Coens C, Nankivell M, Kristensen GB, Parmar MKB, Ehlen T, Jayson GC, Johnson N, Swart AM, Verheijen R, McCluggage WG, Perren T, Panici PB, Kenter G, Casado A, Mendiola C, Stuart G, Reed NS, Kehoe S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1680-1687. [PMID: 30413383 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30566-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual patient data from two randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with upfront debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancer were analysed to examine long-term outcomes for patients and to identify any preferable therapeutic approaches for subgroup populations. METHODS We did a per-protocol pooled analysis of individual patient data from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 55971 trial (NCT00003636) and the Medical Research Council Chemotherapy Or Upfront Surgery (CHORUS) trial (ISRCTN74802813). In the EORTC trial, eligible women had biopsy-proven International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial tubo-ovarian carcinoma. In the CHORUS trial, inclusion criteria were similar to those of the EORTC trial, and women with apparent FIGO stage IIIA and IIIB disease were also eligible. The main aim of the pooled analysis was to show non-inferiority in overall survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with upfront debulking surgery, using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Tests for heterogeneity were based on Cochran's Q heterogeneity statistic. FINDINGS Data for 1220 women were included in the pooled analysis, 670 from the EORTC trial and 550 from the CHORUS trial. 612 women were randomly allocated to receive upfront debulking surgery and 608 to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 7·6 years (IQR 6·0-9·6; EORTC, 9·2 years [IQR 7·3-10·4]; CHORUS, 5·9 years [IQR 4·3-7·4]). Median age was 63 years (IQR 56-71) and median size of the largest metastatic tumour at diagnosis was 8 cm (IQR 4·8-13·0). 55 (5%) women had FIGO stage II-IIIB disease, 831 (68%) had stage IIIC disease, and 230 (19%) had stage IV disease, with staging data missing for 104 (9%) women. In the entire population, no difference in median overall survival was noted between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront debulking surgery (27·6 months [IQR 14·1-51·3] and 26·9 months [12·7-50·1], respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·86-1·09; p=0·586). Median overall survival for EORTC and CHORUS patients was significantly different at 30·2 months (IQR 15·7-53·7) and 23·6 months (10·5-46·9), respectively (HR 1·20, 95% CI 1·06-1·36; p=0·004), but was not heterogeneous (Cochran's Q, p=0·17). Women with stage IV disease had significantly better outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with upfront debulking surgery (median overall survival 24·3 months [IQR 14·1-47·6] and 21·2 months [10·0-36·4], respectively; HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·58-1·00; p=0·048; median progression-free survival 10·6 months [7·9-15·0] and 9·7 months [5·2-13·2], respectively; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·59-1·00; p=0·049). INTERPRETATION Long-term follow-up data substantiate previous results showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront debulking surgery result in similar overall survival in advanced tubo-ovarian cancer, with better survival in women with stage IV disease with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This pooled analysis, with long-term follow-up, shows that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a valuable treatment option for patients with stage IIIC-IV tubo-ovarian cancer, particularly in patients with a high tumour burden at presentation or poor performance status. FUNDING National Cancer Institute and Vlaamse Liga tegen kanker (Flemish League against Cancer).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignace Vergote
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Corneel Coens
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Gynecological Cancer Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthew Nankivell
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
| | - Gunnar B Kristensen
- Norwegian Radium Hospital and Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tom Ehlen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nick Johnson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Ann Marie Swart
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - René Verheijen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Queen's University, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Tim Perren
- Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Gemma Kenter
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Center Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antonio Casado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cesar Mendiola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gavin Stuart
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nick S Reed
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yap J, Fox R, Narsia N, Pinheiro-Maia S, Pounds R, Woodman C, Luesley D, Ganesan R, Kehoe S, Dawson C. Under expression of the Sonic Hedgehog receptor, Patched1 (PTCH1), is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva arising on a background of Lichen Sclerosus. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0206553. [PMID: 30379908 PMCID: PMC6209322 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Dysregulation of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway has been described in a variety of cancers, including cervical cancer, a disease which shares a common aetiology with vulval squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Here, we investigate a large number of primary VSCC cases for evidence of Hedgehog pathway activation and examine the implications of pathway activity on clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with primary VSCC. Methods Archival histology blocks containing VSCC and histologically normal adjacent epithelium were retrieved from a cohort of 91 patients who underwent treatment for primary VSCC. Immunohistochemistry staining was undertaken to assess for the expression of key Hh pathway components (SHH, PTCH1, GLI1). A competing risks statistical model was used to evaluate the implications of the levels of key Hh pathway components on clinical outcomes. Results We show that 92% of primary VSCC cases over-expressed one or more components of the Hh signalling pathway when compared to the adjacent normal epithelium. While expression of SHH and GLI1 did not correlate with any clinicopathological criteria, over- or under-expression of PTCH1 was associated with a reduced or increased risk of developing a local disease recurrence, respectively. In VSCC arising on a background of Lichen Sclerosus, the risk of local recurrence was potentiated in cases where PTCH1 was under-expressed. Conclusions Our findings reveal, for the first time, that the Hh pathway is activated in VSCC and that PTCH1 expression can be used as a biomarker to stratify patients and inform clinicians of the risk of their local recurrence, particularly in cases of VSCC associated with LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Yap
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (JY); (CD)
| | - Richard Fox
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Narsia
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology & Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Palacky University, Olomouc, Moravia, Czech Republic
| | - Sonia Pinheiro-Maia
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Pounds
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Ciaran Woodman
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - David Luesley
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Histopathology, Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dawson
- Birmingham Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (JY); (CD)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Phillips A, Sundar S, Singh K, Pounds R, Nevin J, Kehoe S, Balega J, Elattar A. The NICE classification for 'Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery for advanced ovarian cancer' guidance does not meaningfully predict postoperative complications: a cohort study. BJOG 2018; 126:96-104. [PMID: 30092615 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine which descriptors of cytoreductive surgical extent in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) best predict postoperative morbidity. DESIGN Retrospective notes review. SETTING A gynaecological cancer centre in the UK. POPULATION Six hundred and eight women operated on for AOC over a period of 114 months at a tertiary cancer centre, between 16 August 2007 and 16 February 2017. METHODS Outcome data were analysed by six approaches to classify the extent of surgery: standard/ultra-radical surgery; standard/radical/supra-radical surgery; presence/absence of gastrointestinal resections; low/intermediate/high surgical complexity score (SCS); presence of bowel anastomoses and/or diaphragmatic surgery; and the presence/absence of multiple bowel resections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Major (grades 3-5) postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Forty-three (7.1%) patients experienced major complications. Grade-5 complications occurred in six patients (1.0%). Patients who underwent multiple bowel resections had a relative risk (RR) of 7.73 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 3.92-15.26), patients with a high SCS had an RR of 6.12 (95% CI 3.25-11.52), patients with diaphragmatic surgery and gastrointestinal anastomosis had an RR of 5.57 (95% CI 2.65-11.72), patients with 'any gastrointestinal resection' had an RR of 4.69 (95% CI 2.66-8.24), patients with ultra-radical surgery had an RR of 4.65 (95% CI 2.26-8.79), and patients with supra-radical surgery had an RR of 4.20 (95% CI 2.35-7.51) of grades 3-5 morbidity, compared with patients undergoing standard surgery as defined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK. No significant difference was seen in the rate of major morbidity between standard (6/59, 10.2%) and ultra-radical (9/81, 11.1%) surgery within the cohort who had intermediate complex surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The numbers of procedures performed significantly correlate with major morbidity. The number of procedures performed better predicted major postoperative morbidity than the performance of certain 'high risk' procedures. We recommend using SCS to define a higher risk operation. NICE should re-evaluate the use of the term 'ultra-radical' surgery. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Multiple bowel resection is the best predictor of morbidity and is more predictive than 'ultra-radical surgery'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - S Sundar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Singh
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Pounds
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Nevin
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Kehoe
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Balega
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Elattar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McCulloch P, Feinberg J, Philippou Y, Kolias A, Kehoe S, Lancaster G, Donovan J, Petrinic T, Agha R, Pennell C. Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL. Lancet 2018; 392:88-94. [PMID: 29361334 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30102-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The quality of clinical research in surgery has long attracted criticism. High-quality randomised trials have proved difficult to undertake in surgery, and many surgical treatments have therefore been adopted without adequate supporting evidence of efficacy and safety. This evidence deficit can adversely affect research funding and reimbursement decisions, lead to slow adoption of innovations, and permit widespread adoption of procedures that offer no benefit, or cause harm. Improvement in the quality of surgical evidence would therefore be valuable. The Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) Framework and Recommendations specify desirable qualities for surgical studies, and outline an integrated evaluation pathway for surgery, and similar complex interventions. We used the IDEAL Recommendations to assess methodological progress in surgical research over time, assessed the uptake and influence of IDEAL, and identified the challenges to further methodological progress. Comparing studies from the periods 2000-04 and 2010-14, we noted apparent improvement in the use of standard outcome measures, adoption of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) standards, and assessment of the quality of surgery and of learning curves, but no progress in the use of qualitative research or reporting of modifications during procedure development. Better education about research, integration of rigorous evaluation into routine practice and training, and linkage of such work to awards systems could foster further improvements in surgical evidence. IDEAL has probably contributed only slightly to the improvements described to date, but its uptake is accelerating rapidly. The need for the integrated evaluation template IDEAL offers for surgery and other complex treatments is becoming more widely accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter McCulloch
- Nuffiled Department of Surgical Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Joshua Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Yiannis Philippou
- Nuffiled Department of Surgical Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gillian Lancaster
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Jenny Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tatjana Petrinic
- Cairns Library, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Riaz Agha
- Plastic Surgery Department, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tranoulis A, Laios A, Theophilou G, Bramis K, Kehoe S. The Impact of Saphenous Vein Sparing During Inguinal Lymphadenectomy on Postoperative Morbidity in Women With Vulval Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:1232-1238. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
41
|
Pounds R, Phillips A, Kehoe S, Nevin J, Sundar S, Elattar A, Teo HG, Singh K, Balega J. Diaphragm disease in advanced ovarian cancer: Predictability of pre-operative imaging and safety of surgical intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 226:47-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Revised: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
42
|
Phillips A, Sundar S, Singh K, Nevin J, Elattar A, Kehoe S, Balega J. Complete cytoreduction after five or more cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy confers a survival benefit in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:760-765. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
43
|
Bharathan R, Madhuri K, Fish A, Larsen-Disney P, Chatterjee J, Butler-Manuel S, Tailor A, Kehoe S. Effect of blue dye guided lymph channel ligation on the surgical morbidity of groin lymphadenectomy for vulval cancer: a feasibility study. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2018; 38:674-677. [DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1392492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rasiah Bharathan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Kavitha Madhuri
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Fish
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Peter Larsen-Disney
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Simon Butler-Manuel
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Anil Tailor
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Palavalli Parsons L, Lin K, Miller D, Richardson D, Carlson M, Kehoe S, Lea J. Family History of Cancer Shows Improved Survival in Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
45
|
Phillips A, Singh K, Pounds R, Sundar S, Kehoe S, Nevin J, Elattar A, Balega J. Predictive value of the age-adjusted Charlston co-morbidity index on peri-operative complications, adjuvant chemotherapy usage and survival in patients undergoing debulking surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2017; 37:1070-1075. [PMID: 28741395 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1324413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the age-adjusted Charlston co-morbidity index (ACCI) can predict post-operative complications, adjuvant chemotherapy usage and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A review was performed of all cytoreductive surgeries performed between 16/8/07-3/2/14 for AOC at a UK Cancer Centre. All surgeries were stratified by ACCI into three groups: Low (0-1), Intermediate (2-3) and High (≥4). Of the 293 cases the ACCI distribution was: 74 (25.26%) low, 164 (55.97%) intermediate and 55 (18.77%) high. Patients with a high ACCI were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p = .023), more likely to receive fewer adjuvant cycles (p = .0057) but no more likely to experience complications. Median OS for patients with a low, intermediate and high ACCI was 44.58 (95%CI 36.98-52.19), 34.65 (95%CI 29.48-39.82) and 33.37 (95%CI 17.47-49.27) months. ACCI was associated with OS (p < .01) confirmed on multivariate analysis (p = .03). The ACCI is, therefore, a marker of survival in these patients and predicts adjuvant chemotherapy usage. Impact statement The Age-Adjusted Charlston Co-morbidity Index has previously been identified as a predictor of survival in both medical and surgical conditions. Recently it has also been validated in patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. This study is the first to validate the Age-Adjusted Charlston Co-morbidity Index in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings demonstrate that it can be used to not only predict overall survival in women undergoing debulking surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy but also predicts the uptake and commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy. Such findings are important considerations to enable an informed patient choice regarding interval surgery in the more co-morbid patients. More importantly, although the ACCI can be used as a marker of overall survival, even in the most co-morbid of patients there remains a significant survival advantage following surgery to the extent that it should not be contraindicated in this cohort. The ACCI is being increasingly incorporated into various clinical trials as a standard demographic measure and this study validates its inclusion in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Phillips
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Kavita Singh
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Rachel Pounds
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Sean Kehoe
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - James Nevin
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Ahmed Elattar
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - Janos Balega
- a Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre , City Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pounds R, Leonard S, Dawson C, Kehoe S. Repurposing itraconazole for the treatment of cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:2587-2597. [PMID: 28927025 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The repurposing of drugs is becoming increasingly attractive as it avoids the lengthy process and cost implications associated with bringing a novel drug to market. Itraconazole is a broad-spectrum anti-fungal agent. An emerging body of in vivo, in vitro and clinical evidence have confirmed that it also possesses antineoplastic activities and has a synergistic action when combined with other chemotherapeutic agents. It acts via several mechanisms to prevent tumour growth, including inhibition of the Hedgehog pathway, prevention of angiogenesis, decreased endothelial cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest and induction of auto-phagocytosis. These allow itraconazole, either alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents, to increase drug efficacy and overcome drug resistance. This study reviews the reported literature on the use of itraconazole in a variety of malignancies and highlights the recent insights into the critical pathways acted upon to prevent tumour growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Pounds
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Leonard
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dawson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Phillips A, Balega J, Nevin J, Singh K, Elattar A, Kehoe S, Sundar S. Reporting ‘Denominator’ data is essential for benchmarking and quality standards in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:94-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
48
|
O'Sullivan B, Brierley J, Byrd D, Bosman F, Kehoe S, Kossary C, Piñeros M, Van Eycken E, Weir HK, Gospodarowicz M. The TNM classification of malignant tumours-towards common understanding and reasonable expectations. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:849-851. [PMID: 28677562 PMCID: PMC5851445 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30438-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian O'Sullivan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - James Brierley
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - David Byrd
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Fred Bosman
- University Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Medical Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carol Kossary
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Hannah K Weir
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pérez-López FR, Ceausu I, Depypere H, Kehoe S, Lambrinoudaki I, Mueck A, Senturk LM, Simoncini T, Stevenson JC, Stute P, Rees M. Interventions to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer: A European Menopause and Andropause Society Position Statement. Maturitas 2017; 100:86-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Fotopoulou C, Hall M, Cruickshank D, Gabra H, Ganesan R, Hughes C, Kehoe S, Ledermann J, Morrison J, Naik R, Rolland P, Sundar S. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: recommendations for practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 213:123-139. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|