Phase III comparison of twice-daily split-course irradiation versus once-daily irradiation for patients with limited stage small-cell lung carcinoma

Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) with twice-a-day radiation therapy (RT) has remained the standard of care for many decades. Growing evidence suggests that outcomes with dose escalated twice-a-day RT may further improve outcomes. However, once-daily treatment remains common. The purpose of this study was to evaluate individual treatment facilities for utilization of twice-a-day RT.

METHODS

Patients with LS-SCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation from 2004 to 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database. RT was classified as twice-a-day (45 Gy in 30 fractions) or once-daily (59.4-70.2 Gy in 30-39 fractions). Patients were excluded if surgery was performed. All patients received doublet chemotherapy. Unique treatment facilities delivering at least one twice-a-day treatment course during the study period were classified as BID-treating. Facilities not delivering any twice-a-day RT were classified as QD-only. The proportion of QD-only facilities was identified. Facility-level characteristics associated with QD-only classification were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 22,362 patients with LS-SCLC were treated at 1,222 unique facilities. A slight majority of facilities (n = 644, 52.7%) were BID-treating, whereas fewer (n = 578, 47.3%) were QD-only. A total of 73.9% of academic facilities were BID-treating versus 48.3% of nonacademic facility types (P < .001). Only 20.7% of low volume treatment facilities (lowest quartile of patients with LS-SCLC treated) used twice-a-day fractionation versus 78.2% of the highest quartile volume facilities (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, academic and high-volume facilities were statistically significantly associated with BID-treating classification (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5 [P < .001] and 4.2 [P < .001], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of facilities treating LS-SCLC with definitive chemoradiation do not use twice-a-day fractionation schedules despite ongoing and growing evidence of superiority to once-daily fractionation. High-volume, academic facilities were more likely to offer twice-a-day fractionation.

Quality of life outcomes in patients participating in the CALGB 30610 trial (CALGB 70702): Alliance

BACKGROUND

CALGB 30610 trial demonstrated that once daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was not superior compared to standard twice daily TRT, in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Quality of life outcomes may help oncologists decide the best treatment approach.

METHODS

A total of 417 patients on CALGB 30610 participated in the quality-of-life substudy (CALGB 70702), which included the FACT Trial Outcome Index-Lung Cancer (FACT-L TOI), FACT-Esophageal Cancer (FACT-E) Eating and Swallowing Indices, ECOG Acute Esophagitis Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), difficulty swallowing, EQ-5D, and treatment convenience assessment at baseline, 3, 5, 7, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after starting TRT. Primary end points included FACT-L TOI and FACT-E at 12 weeks. Mean changes from baseline were compared between arms using general linear mixed models.

RESULTS

FACT-L worsening was more in the twice daily arm at week 3 (-1.0 vs. -7.0). FACT-L TOI worsening was less at week 3 (-2.9 vs. -7.6) and greater at week 12 (-7.6 vs. -2.8) in the once daily arm. The once daily arm had a lower EQ-5D index worsening at 3 weeks (0.01 vs. -0.02). Increase in acute esophagitis score (1.06 vs. 2.89; p < .001) and difficulty swallowing (0.39 vs. 1.14) were greater in the twice daily arm at week 3. A total of 74.5% of patients on the once daily arm felt that treatment was convenient, compared to 67% of patients in the twice daily arm (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The once daily arm had better quality-of-life scores earlier during treatment and was perceived to be more convenient.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Population Survival Kinetics Derived from Clinical Trials of Potentially Curable Lung Cancers

Using digitized data from progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves, one can assess population survival kinetics through exponential decay nonlinear regression analyses. To demonstrate their utility, we analyzed PFS curves from published curative-intent trials of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADAURA trial), chemoradiotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, and limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These analyses permit assessment of log-linear curve shape and estimation of the proportion of patients cured, PFS half-lives for subpopulations destined to eventually relapse, and probability of eventual relapse in patients remaining progression-free at different time points. The proportion of patients potentially cured was 41% for adjuvant controls, 58% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 17% for ADAURA controls, not assessable with adjuvant osimertinib, 15% with chemoradiotherapy, and 12% for SCLC. Median PFS half-life for relapsing subpopulations was 11.9 months for adjuvant controls, 17.4 months with adjuvant chemotherapy, 24.4 months for ADAURA controls, not assessable with osimertinib, 9.3 months with chemoradiotherapy, and 10.7 months for SCLC. For those remaining relapse-free at 2 and 5 years, the cure probability was 74%/96% for adjuvant controls, 77%/93% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 51%/94% with chemoradiation, and 39%/87% with limited SCLC. Relatively easy population kinetic analyses add useful information.

Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) is the first-line recommended regimen for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is also regarded as an effective treatment for limited-stage (LS) SCLC, and the efficacy and safety of HART versus SBRT stay controversial.

METHODS

In this study, 188 LS-SCLC patients were retrospectively divided into two groups receiving chemotherapy combined with either HART or SBRT. In HART group, patients received 4500 cGy in 30 fractions, administered twice daily for 3 weeks. Whereas in the SBRT group, a total radiation dose of 4000-4500 cGy was delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. Thirty-three pairs of patients were finally included for next analysis.

RESULTS

The estimated objective response rates were 63.6 % (21/33) and 78.8 % (26/33) in HART group and SBRT group, respectively (P = 0.269). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between HART and SBRT groups in overall survival (26 months vs. 29 months, P = 0.362) and progression free survival (11 months vs. 15 months, P = 0.223). As for the adverse events, toxicity of both groups is similar and slight that no grade 4 event was observed. Grade 3 pneumonitis cases were all occurred in the HART group (9.1%, 3/33, P = 0.238), and grade 3 esophagitis cases were all occurred in the SBRT group (6.1%, 2/33, P = 0.492).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HART, SBRT could be another effective treatment with satisfactory safety for the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Factors associated with overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity in patients with small cell lung cancer and thoracic irradiation in a clinical real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant tumor known for its poor prognosis. In addition to chemotherapy and immunotherapy irradiation plays a big role especially in inoperability. This study evaluated prognostic factors in patients with SCLC, receiving chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation, that may affect overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity.

METHODS

Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC (n = 57) and extensive disease (ED) SCLC (n = 69) who received thoracic radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic factors sex, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), tumor-, nodal-stage and timepoint of start of irradiation in relation to the first cycle of chemotherapy were evaluated. Start of irradiation was stratified as early ([Formula: see text] 2 cycles of chemotherapy), late (3 or 4 cycles) and very late ([Formula: see text] 5 cycles). Results were analyzed by Cox univariate and multivariate as well as logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median OS of LD-SCLC patients was 23.7 months in early, and 22.0 months in late start of irradiation. In very late start, median OS was not reached. PFS was 11.8, 15.2 and 47.9 months, respectively. In patients with ED-SCLC OS was 4.3 months in early, 13.0 months in late and 12.2 months in very late start of irradiation. PFS was 6.7, 13.0 and 12.2 months, respectively. Prognosis of patients with LD- or ED-SCLC receiving late or very late start of irradiation was significantly prolonged in OS and PFS compared to an early start (p < 0.05). KPS [Formula: see text] 80 shows a significant increase of OS and PFS in ED-SCLC. Female sex and smaller mean lung dose were associated with lower risk of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Late or very late start of irradiation is a prognosis-enhancing factor in LD-SCLC and ED-SCLC for OS and PFS. KPS [Formula: see text] 80 increases prognosis of OS and PFS in ED-SCLC as well. Toxicity is less common in female sex and patients with low mean lung dose in LD-SCLC.

Radiotherapy Fraction in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8006 Reconstructed Individual Patient Data

The optimal thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose and fractionation for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) using modern techniques remain unclear. We conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the efficacy and safety differences between definitive hypofractionated TRT (HypoTRT), conventional TRT (ConvTRT) and hyperfractionated TRT (HyperTRT), especially in the modern era. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world cohorts, and single-arm trials published between 1990 and 2021 were identified. Two meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) were conducted: (i) a random-effects meta-analysis based on reconstructed individual-patient data (IPD) of all studies; and (ii) a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on study-level aggregated data (AD) of RCTs. The incidences of severe radiation-related toxicities were compared using the random-effects meta-regression model. Overall, 53 of the 30,031 publications met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 8006 IPD were reconstructed. After adjusting for key treatment variables and stratification by study type, there were no significant differences in the OS rates between the altered fractionation regimens (HypoTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR [adjusted HR] = 1.05, 95% CI 0.93-1.19; ConvTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR = 1.00, 95% CI 0·90-1.11; HypoTRT vs. ConvTRT, aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.20). In the modern era, the survival outcomes of all three schedules, while remaining comparable, have improved significantly. Results of the AD-based network meta-analysis were consistent with those of IPD analysis, and HypoTRT was ranked as the best regimen (SUCRA = 81%). There were no significant differences in toxicities between groups when using modern radiation techniques. In the modern era, no significant differences in OS or severe radiation-related toxicities were observed between altered schedules in LS-SCLC. HypoTRT may be associated with moderate and non-significant OS improvements, which should be further confirmed in prospective randomized phase III trials.

Comparative effectiveness and toxicity of radiotherapy regimens in limited stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this Network Meta-analysis was to compare the current radiotherapy regimens of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis and radioactive pneumonia.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched until January 2022. The studies were included, comparing radiotherapy regimens in LS-SCLC patients. We compared hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoTRT), hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HyperTRT), and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (ConvTRT1(<60 Gy), ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy)).

RESULTS

There was similar efficacy among the contemporary radiotherapy regimens for PFS of LS-SCLC. HypoTRT and HyperTRT significantly improved the OS of LS-SCLC compared with ConvTRT1 (<60 Gy), while not improving the OS of LS-SCLC compared with ConvTRT2 (≥60 Gy). There was no significant difference between HypoTRT and HyperTRT, between ConvTRT1(<60 Gy) and ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy), respectively. HyperTRT developed the highest odds of acute radioactive esophagitis compared to ConvTRT1(<60 Gy) and ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis between HypoTRT and HyperTRT, ConvTRT1(<60 Gy), ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy), respectively and between ConvTRT1 and ConvTRT2. There was no statistically significant difference among radiotherapy regimens for the incidence of acute radioactive pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The current radiotherapy regimens are similar in efficacy and toxicity for LS-SCLC, except for ConvTRT1(<60 Gy). Given the lower costs and convenient logistics management of HypoTRT comparatively, it is an acceptable alternative for LS-SCLC.

Phase I study of amrubicin plus cisplatin and concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer: protocol of ACIST study

Background

Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard treatment strategy for unresectable limited‐disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has remained unchanged for over two decades. Based on a previous study that confirmed the non‐inferiority of amrubicin (AMR) plus cisplatin (AP) when compared with EP for extensive‐disease (ED) SCLC, we have previously conducted a phase I study assessing AP with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/time, once daily, 50 Gy in total) for LD‐SCLC therapy. Our findings revealed that AP with concurrent TRT could prolong overall survival to 39.5 months with manageable toxicities. Therefore, we plan to conduct a phase I study to investigate and determine the effect of AP combined with AHTRT, recommended dose (RD), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) of AP in patients with LD‐SCLC.

Methods

Treatment‐naive patients with LD‐SCLC, age between 20 and 75 years, who had a performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ functions will be enrolled. For chemotherapy, cisplatin 60 mg/m²/day (day 1) and AMR (day 1 to 3) will be administered with AHTRT (1.5 Gy/time, twice daily, 45 Gy in total). The initial AMR dose is set to 25 mg/m²/day. RD and MTD will be determined by evaluating toxicities.

Discussion

Based on our previous study, the initial dose of AMR 25 mg/m² is expected to be tolerated and acceptable. Here, we aim to determine whether treatment with AP and concurrent AHTRT would be an optimal choice with manageable toxicities for LD‐SCLC.

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Proton Plus Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the tolerance and effect of proton plus carbon-ion radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer using the pencil beam scanning technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2017 to April 2020, 25 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with combined proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy were analyzed. The primary lesions and involved lymph nodes were irradiated using 2-4 portals. Proton and sequential carbon-ion beams were delivered with a median dose of 67.1 (range, 63-74.8) GyE as fraction doses of 2.0-2.2 GyE with proton beams in 20-23 fractions and 3.0-3.8 GyE with carbon ions in 5-8 fractions. Chemotherapy was delivered concurrently with radiotherapy in all patients.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the 2-year overall and locoregional progression-free survival rates were 81.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Radiochemotherapy was well tolerated, with grade 1, 2, and 3 acute toxicities occurring in 12.0%, 68.0%, and 20.0% of patients, respectively. All grade 3 acute toxicities were hematologically related changes. One patient experienced grade 3 acute non-hematological toxicity in the esophagus, and one other patient had grade 3 bronchial obstruction accompanied by obstructive atelectasis as a late side effect.

CONCLUSION

Proton plus carbon-ion radiotherapy using pencil beam scanning yielded promising survival rates and tolerability in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. A prospective clinical study is warranted to validate the therapeutic efficacy of particle radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Clinical significance of the cachexia index in patients with small cell lung cancer

Background

Cancer cachexia worsens the treatment outcomes of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, no reliable biomarker of cancer cachexia is yet known.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated male SCLC patients who received induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The cachexia index (CXI) was calculated as skeletal muscle index × serum albumin level (g/dL)/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The CXI cutoff according to tumor stage was determined based on a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, and all patients were divided into low- and high-CXI groups.

Results

Of 267 patients, 83 and 24 patients with limited-stage disease (LD) and 123 and 37 patients with extensive-stage disease (ED) were assigned to the high- and low-CXI groups, respectively. Only one of 24 patients (4.2%) with LD in the low-CXI group achieved a complete response (CR), whereas 30 of 83 patients (36.1%) with LD in the high-CXI group achieved CRs (p = 0.004). More low-CXI patients required early discontinuation of treatment because of treatment-related toxicity compared to the high-CXI patients (37.5% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p = 0.030, for LD patients; 27.0% vs. 11.4%, respectively, p = 0.019, for ED patients). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in the low-CXI group than the high-CXI group (6.3 vs. 11.1 months and 7.5 vs. 20.6 months, respectively, both p <  0.001 for LD patients; 2.9 vs. 6.3 months and 5.8 vs. 12.8 months, respectively, both p <  0.001, for ED patients). On multivariate analysis, low-CXI status was an independent poor prognostic factor for both PFS and OS regardless of the tumor stage.

Conclusion

A low CXI was associated with treatment intolerance, poor treatment response rate, and poor prognosis in SCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08300-x.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

Several sentinel phase III randomized trials have recently been published challenging traditional radiation therapy (RT) practices for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline reviews the evidence for thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for both limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on indications, dose fractionation, techniques and timing of thoracic RT for LS-SCLC, the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional RT in stage I or II node negative SCLC, PCI for LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, and thoracic consolidation for ES-SCLC. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

The task force strongly recommends definitive thoracic RT administered once or twice daily early in the course of treatment for LS-SCLC. Adjuvant RT is conditionally recommended in surgically resected patients with positive margins or nodal metastases. Involved field RT delivered using conformal advanced treatment modalities to postchemotherapy volumes is also strongly recommended. For patients with stage I or II node negative disease, SBRT or conventional fractionation is strongly recommended, and chemotherapy should be delivered before or after SBRT. In LS-SCLC, PCI is strongly recommended for stage II or III patients who responded to chemoradiation, conditionally not recommended for stage I patients, and should be a shared decision for patients at higher risk of neurocognitive toxicities. In ES-SCLC, radiation oncologist consultation for consideration of PCI versus magnetic resonance surveillance is strongly recommended. Lastly, the use of thoracic RT is strongly recommended in select patients with ES-SCLC after chemotherapy treatment, including a conditional recommendation in those responding to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

RT plays a vital role in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. These guidelines inform best clinical practices for local therapy in SCLC.

A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median.

RESULTS

We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I²33.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I²79.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I²77.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I²78.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I²75.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I²81.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I²72.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I²77.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I²95.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Twice-Daily vs. Once-Daily Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Currently, the accepted standard management of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), but the frequency of radiotherapy is controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis, which compared the efficacy and toxicity between twice-daily (BID) and once-daily (OD) CCRT, was performed to help clinicians make better decisions. Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected by searching the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus and Google Scholar databases to assess antitumor effects (overall survival, OS; progression-free survival, PFS; overall response rate, ORR) and toxicity (adverse effects, AEs). Results: We screened 1499 articles and included 5 RCTs including 1421 patients. We found that BID CCRT improved OS (hazard ratio, HR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.78-0.99, p = 0.03), the 1-year OS rate (OSR-1y, risk ratio, RR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.03), and OSR-4y (RR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.03-1.43, p = 0.02), with better trends in OSR-2y, OSR-3y, and OSR-5y, compared to OD CCRT. In addition, BID CCRT had a higher complete response (CR, RR = 1.31, 95%CI 1.01-1.70, p = 0.04) than OD CCRT. PFS (HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.79-1.07, p = 0.29), annual PFS rate, ORR (RR = 0.99, 95%CI 0.93-1.05, p = 0.72), and AEs for all grades (RR = 1.00, 95%CI 0.98-1.01, p = 0.57), and grades 3-5 (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, p = 0.60) were similar between the two arms. Conclusions: BID CCRT appears to be better than OD CCRT for limited-stage SCLC, with better antitumor effects (OS, OSR, and CR) and similar AEs. However, the high levels of AEs in both arms should be taken as a sign of caution. More large sample and high-quality RCTs need to be conducted to confirm our conclusions.

Current management of limited-stage SCLC and CONVERT trial impact: Results of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group survey

OBJECTIVES

The CONVERT trial showed that twice-daily (BD) concurrent chemoradiotherapy should continue to be considered the standard of care in localised LS-SCLC. A survey was conducted to assess the impact of the CONVERT trial in clinical practice and to identify any relevant research questions for future trials in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An EORTC Group online survey of LS-SCLC practice was distributed to the EORTC LCG and to members of several European thoracic oncology societies between April and December 2018.

RESULTS

198 responses were analysed. The majority of respondents (88%, n = 174) were aware of the CONVERT trial. Radiation oncologists comprised 56% of all respondents. Once-daily (OD) radiotherapy is still the most commonly used regimen, however the use of concurrent BD radiotherapy increased after the publication of CONVERT (n = 59/186, 32% prior to and n = 78/187, 42% after the publication, p = 0.053). The main reasons for not implementing BD after the CONVERT publication were logistical issues (n = 88, 44%), inconvenience for patients (n = 56, 28%), and the absence of a statistical survival difference between the two arms in CONVERT (n = 38, 19%). Brain MRI was used by 28% during staging but more than half (60%) of the respondents did not routinely image the brain during follow-up. The main research questions of interest in LS-SCLC were 1) integrating novel targeted therapies-immunotherapies (n = 160, 81%), 2) PCI (+/- hippocampal sparing) vs. MRI surveillance (n = 140, 71%) and, 3) biomarker driven trials (n = 92, 46%).

CONCLUSION

Once daily radiotherapy (60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions) remains the most prescribed radiotherapy fractionation, despite the findings suggested by the CONVERT trial.

Association of Chemoradiotherapy With Outcomes Among Patients With Stage I to II vs Stage III Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

There is limited evidence to guide stage I to II small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment.

Objective

To examine the characteristics and outcomes among patients with stage I to II SCLC treated with modern chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this post hoc secondary analysis of the Concurrent Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Radiotherapy Trial (CONVERT), a multicenter phase 3 trial conducted in patients with limited-stage SCLC from April 7, 2008, to November 29, 2013, patients with TNM stage I to II SCLC were compared with those with stage III disease. Data analysis was performed from November 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018.

Interventions

In CONVERT, patients were randomized to receive twice-daily (45 Gy in 30 fractions) or once-daily (66 Gy in 33 fractions) chemoradiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was offered, if indicated.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary trial end point was overall survival (OS). TNM staging information was collected prospectively; this was an unplanned analysis because stratification was not performed according to TNM stage.

Results

A total of 509 (277 [54.4%] men; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [8.3] years) of 543 patients (93.7%) with TNM staging information were eligible for this subgroup analysis, and 86 of the 509 (16.9%) had TNM stage I to II disease. The median gross tumor volume was smaller in patients with stage I to II disease (38.4 cm3; range, 2.2-593.0 cm3) compared with patients with stage III disease (93 cm3; range, 0.5-513.4 cm3) (P < .001). No other significant differences were found in baseline and treatment characteristics and chemoradiotherapy adherence between the 2 groups or the number of patients with stage I to II disease (78 [90.7%]) and stage III disease (346 [81.8%]) who received PCI (P = .10). Patients with stage I to II disease achieved longer OS (median, 50 months [95% CI, 38 to not reached months] vs 25 months [95% CI, 21-29 months]; hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.83]; P = .001) compared with patients with stage III disease. In patients with stage I to II disease, no significant survival difference was found between the trial arms (median, 39 months in the once-daily arm vs 72 months in the twice-daily arm; P = .38). Apart from lower incidence of acute esophagitis in patients with stage I to II disease compared with patients with stage III disease (grade ≥3, 9 [11.3%] vs 82 [21.1%]; P < .001), the incidences of acute and late toxic effects were not significantly different.

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients with stage I to II SCLC in CONVERT achieved long-term survival with acceptable toxic effects after chemoradiotherapy and PCI. This study suggests that patients with stage I to II small cell lung cancer treated with modern chemoradiotherapy have better outcomes compared with patients with stage III disease, providing information that practitioners can potentially give their patients to aid clinical decisions.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00433563.

Combining Survival and Toxicity Effect Sizes from Clinical Trials: NCCTG 89-20-52 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

How can a clinician and patient incorporate survival and toxicity information into a single expression of comparative treatment benefit? Sloan et al. recently extended the ½ standard deviation concept for judging the clinical importance of findings from clinical trials to survival and tumor response endpoints. A new method using this approach to combine survival and toxicity effect sizes from clinical trials into a quality-adjusted effect size is presented.

METHODS

The quality-adjusted survival effect size (QASES) is calculated as survival effect size (ESS) minus the calibrated toxicity effect sizes (EST) (QASES=ESS-EST). This combined effect size can be weighted to adjust for the relative emphasis placed by the patient on survival and toxicity effects.

RESULTS

As an example, consider clinical trial NCCTG 89-20-52 which randomized patients to once-daily thoracic radiotherapy (ODTRT) versus twice-daily treatment of thoracic radiotherapy (TDRT) for the treatment of lung cancer. The ODTRT vs. TDRT arms had median survival time of 22 vs. 20 months (p=0.49) and toxicity rate of 39% vs. 54%, (p<0.05). The QASES of 0.18 standard deviations translates to a quality-adjusted survival difference of 5.7 months advantage for the ODRT arm over the TDRT treatment arm (22(16.3) months), p<0.05). Similar results are presented for the four possible case combinations of significant/non-significant survival and toxicity benefits using completed clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

We used a novel approach to re-analyze clinical trial data to produce a single estimate for each treatment that combines survival and toxicity data. The QASES approach is an intuitive and mathematically simple yet robust approach.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive form of lung cancer. SCLC treatment requires multidisciplinary management and timely treatment. Radiation therapy is an important part of management of all stages of SCLC, in the curative as well as in the palliative setting. The role of radiation therapy in all stages of SCLC has changed in recent years; this article describes these changes and highlights the role of radiation therapy in the management of SCLC.

Advances in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor characterized by early metastatic spread and responsiveness to initial therapy. The incidence of SCLC has been declining in the United States in parallel with the decreasing prevalence of cigarette smoking. Limited stage disease is potentially curable with chemoradiotherapy followed by cranial irradiation. Extensive stage disease is incurable, but systemic chemotherapy can improve quality of life and prolong survival. Nearly all patients relapse with chemoresistant disease. Molecularly targeted therapy has failed to yield convincing clinical benefits. Nevertheless, many biologically rational strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, show promise in ongoing clinical trials.

Prognostic value of pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET uptake in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease, despite an initially favorable response to treatment, and its prognosis is still poor. Multiple parameters have been studied as possible prognostic factors, but none of them are reliable enough to change the treatment approach. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a novel imaging technique for staging of SCLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-treatment FDG-PET parameters on clinical outcome in limited stage (LS) SCLC patients treated with curative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Clinical records of 46 LS-SCLC patients with pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with definitive RT for a total dose of 50-60 Gy and chemotherapy. The clinical endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median age was 59 (range 30-82) years, and median follow-up time was 23.2 months (range 5-82.8 months). Median OS was 30.9 months for pre-treatment tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) <9.3 and 20.6 months for SUV_max ≥9.3 (p = 0.027) and PFS was 55.6 months for SUV_max <9.3 and 38.6 months for SUV_max ≥9.3 (p = 0.16). Median OS was 73 months for pre-treatment lymph node SUV_max <5.8 and 21 months for ≥5.8 (p = 0.01) and PFS was 38.6 months (range 6.8-70.3 months) for SUV_max-LN ≥5.8; all patients with SUV_max-LN <5.8 were alive (p = 0.07). Median survival time was 28.2 months (range 21.7-34.7 months) for patients younger than 65 and 8.7 months (range 5.7-11.8 months) for those ≥65 years (p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment FDG-PET uptake may be a valuable tool to evaluate prognosis in SCLC patients. Patients with a higher pre-treatment FDG uptake may be considered at increased risk of failure and may benefit from more aggressive treatment approaches.

Thoracic irradiation in 3weeks for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Is twice a day fractionation really needed?

PURPOSE

Many Canadian institutions treat limited-disease small cell lung cancer with 40Gy in 15 fractions delivered once-a-day in 3weeks concomitantly with chemotherapy. This regimen is convenient and seems to be effective. Here, we report and compare with a literature review the outcomes of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated in our institution with this hypofractionated regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2012, patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated curatively with platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at a dose of 40Gy in 16 fractions once-a-day were eligible for this review.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients fit the analysis criteria, including ten patients with small pleural effusion. The median age was 66years old. After a median follow-up of 77months for those alive, the median survival was 28months. At 3 and 5years respectively, the locoregional control rates were 67 and 64%, while the overall survival rates were 40 and 35%. Prophylaxis cranial irradiation was delivered to 68% of the patients. Grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis occurred in respectively 49 and 9% of the patients. There was no grade 4 radiation-induced toxicity. All patients, except for one, completed their thoracic irradiation course without interruption.

CONCLUSION

Once-a-day hypofractionated radiation with concurrent chemotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation is a practical regimen. Based on our experience and the published literature, it appears to be similarly effective as regimens using twice-daily fractionation in 3weeks, or once-daily in 6 to 7weeks with higher radiotherapy doses. Further prospective comparisons of hypofractionation with the current recommendations are needed.

Risk factors for brain metastases after prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer

Despite administration of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), some small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients still suffer from brain metastases (BM) with unknown risk factors. We conducted this study to identify patients with higher BM risk after PCI and improve their outcome. The characteristics and survival of all the SCLC patients underwent PCI in our institute from 2003 to 2014 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate BM free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors for BM. A total of 175 patients with the median age of 55 years (range, 29–76) were eligible, among whom 36 (20.6%) developed BM with median follow-up of 42 months. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed HART and TNM classification (p < 0.05) were associated with BM. Two-stage system was not related with BMFS or OS (p > 0.05). Stage IIIB-IV and HART were independent risk factors for BM after PCI in SCLC. TNM classification was more valuable on prognosis than two-stage system. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials

BACKGROUND

Futility (inefficacy) interim monitoring is an important component in the conduct of phase III clinical trials, especially in life-threatening diseases. Desirable futility monitoring guidelines allow timely stopping if the new therapy is harmful or if it is unlikely to demonstrate to be sufficiently effective if the trial were to continue to its final analysis. There are a number of analytical approaches that are used to construct futility monitoring boundaries. The most common approaches are based on conditional power, sequential testing of the alternative hypothesis, or sequential confidence intervals. The resulting futility boundaries vary considerably with respect to the level of evidence required for recommending stopping the study.

PURPOSE

We evaluate the performance of commonly used methods using event histories from completed phase III clinical trials of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

METHODS

We considered published superiority phase III trials with survival endpoints initiated after 1990. There are 52 studies available for this analysis from different disease sites. Total sample size and maximum number of events (statistical information) for each study were calculated using protocol-specified effect size, type I and type II error rates. In addition to the common futility approaches, we considered a recently proposed linear inefficacy boundary approach with an early harm look followed by several lack-of-efficacy analyses. For each futility approach, interim test statistics were generated for three schedules with different analysis frequency, and early stopping was recommended if the interim result crossed a futility stopping boundary. For trials not demonstrating superiority, the impact of each rule is summarized as savings on sample size, study duration, and information time scales.

RESULTS

For negative studies, our results show that the futility approaches based on testing the alternative hypothesis and repeated confidence interval rules yielded less savings (compared to the other two rules). These boundaries are too conservative, especially during the first half of the study (<50% of information). The conditional power rules are too aggressive during the second half of the study (>50% of information) and may stop a trial even when there is a clinically meaningful treatment effect. The linear inefficacy boundary with three or more interim analyses provided the best results. For positive studies, we demonstrated that none of the futility rules would have stopped the trials.

CONCLUSION

The linear inefficacy boundary futility approach is attractive from statistical, clinical, and logistical standpoints in clinical trials evaluating new anti-cancer agents.

The Current Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiotherapy has been shown to play a key role in the management of small cell lung cancer. There are well-established data in the literature for the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage I-III disease, although key questions remain over the timing of radiation, the optimal dose/fractionation and particularly once versus twice daily treatment, the use of elective nodal irradiation and drug combinations. Data for the use of thoracic radiation in stage IV disease, after chemotherapy, have recently become available and are leading to a change in practice. Prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to be of use in both stage I-III and stage IV disease, although uncertainties surround its use in the elderly population and the use of brain imaging before treatment. This overview will address the current available evidence and focus on areas for future research.

Management of small-cell lung cancer with radiotherapy-a pan-Canadian survey of radiation oncologists

BACKGROUND

The management of small-cell lung cancer (sclc) with radiotherapy (rt) varies, with many treatment regimens having been described in the literature. We created a survey to assess patterns of practice and clinical decision-making in the management of sclc by Canadian radiation oncologists (ros).

METHODS

A 35-item survey was sent by e-mail to Canadian ros. The questions investigated the role of rt, the dose and timing of rt, target delineation, and use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (pci) in limited-stage (ls) and extensive-stage (es) sclc.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 52 eligible ros. For ls-sclc, staging (98%) and simulation or dosimetric (96%) computed tomography imaging were key determinants of rt suitability. The most common dose and fractionation schedule was 40-45 Gy in 15 once-daily fractions (40%), with elective nodal irradiation performed by 31% of ros. Preferred management of clinical T1/2aN0 sclc favoured primary chemoradiotherapy (64%). For es-sclc, consolidative thoracic rt was frequently offered (88%), with a preferred dose and fractionation schedule of 30 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions (70%). Extrathoracic consolidative rt would not be offered by 23 ros (44%). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was generally offered in ls-sclc (100%) and es-sclc (98%) after response to initial treatment. Performance status, baseline cognition, and pre-pci brain imaging were important patient factors assessed before an offer of pci.

CONCLUSIONS

Canadian ros show practice variation in sclc management. Future clinical trials and national treatment guidelines might reduce variability in the treatment of early-stage disease, optimization of dose and targeting in ls-sclc, and definition of suitability for pci or consolidative rt.

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer of neuroendocrine origin, which is strongly associated with cigarette smoking. Patients typically present with a short duration of symptoms and frequently (60-65 %) with metastatic disease. SCLC is a heterogeneous disease including extremely chemosensitive and chemoresistant clones. For this reason, a high percentage of patients respond to first-line chemotherapy but rapidly succumb to the disease. SCLC is generally divided into two stages, limited and extensive. Standard treatment of limited stage disease includes combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for four cycles, thoracic radiation initiated early with the first cycle of chemotherapy, and consideration of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the subset of patients with good response. Surgery may play a role in TNM stages I and II. In extensive disease, platinum agents and etoposide, used in combination, are again the first-line standard of care in the USA. However, thoracic radiation therapy is used predominately in patients where local control is important and PCI is of uncertain benefit. Despite these treatments, prognosis remains poor and novel therapies are needed to improve survival in this disease.

PET-CT guided curative conformal radiation therapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been improving with the advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) which has been studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for a long time, and it has only recently been applied to SCLC. Therefore we sought to observe firstly the prognostic importance of the FDG uptake in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) patients and secondly the clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of LD-SCLC patients treated with conformal radiation therapy (RT) using FDG-PET/CT simulation.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 33 LD-SCLC patients with LD-SCLC underwent disease staging using FDG-PET/CT conformal RT. Thoracic radiation was administered at a daily fraction of 2 Gy. Total dose was prescribed according to the treatment protocol such as, concurrent or sequential chemotherapy and in some patients according to the response of CT. All patients underwent chemotherapy. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 38-77 years). The median follow-up time was 20 months (range, 6.6-47.6 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and locoregional control rates were 23% and 48%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies examining the impact of PET-CT and the prognostic significance of FDG-uptake on outcomes in patients with LD-SCLC. Higher RT doses in response to higher FDG uptake may be safely applied for the purpose of locoregional control.

Effect of early chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effect of early chemoradiotherapy on the treatment of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2011, thirty-one patients with histologically proven LS-SCLC who were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The chemotherapy regimen was composed of etoposide and cisplatin. Thoracic radiotherapy consisted of 50 to 60 Gy (median, 54 Gy) given in 5 to 6.5 weeks.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 53 months (median, 22 months). After chemoradiotherapy, 35.5% of the patients (11 patients) showed complete response, 61.3% (19 patients) showed partial response, 3.2% (one patient) showed progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate of 96.8% (30 patients). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 66.5%, 41.0%, and 28.1%, respectively, with a median OS of 21.3 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 49.8%, 22.8%, and 13.7%, respectively, with median PFS of 12 months. The patterns of failure were: locoregional recurrences in 29.0% (nine patients), distant metastasis in 9.7% (three patients), and both locoregional and distant metastasis in 9.7% (three patients). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities of leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 32.2%, 29.0%, and 25.8%, respectively. Grade 3 radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis were shown in 12.9% and 6.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that early chemoradiotherapy for LS-SCLC provides feasible and acceptable local control and safety.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13% of all lung cancers, and limited-disease SCLC is defined as a disease that can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation field. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for limited-disease SCLC. In both concurrent and consolidation chemoradiotherapies, the combination of etoposide and cisplatin is considered to be a standard chemotherapy regimen. To develop novel treatment for SCLC, several clinical trials of molecular-targeted therapy or immunotherapy have been reported. However, no molecular-targeted drug has shown clinical activity in limited-disease SCLC. In future studies, understanding the molecular profile of SCLC will be necessary for the development of molecular-targeted therapies for SCLC. This review provides an overview of chemotherapy regimens for limited-disease SCLC.

Feasibility of tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer

Background: To assess the tolerance of patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiation with tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the toxicity profile for nine patients with small cell lung cancer of the limited stage who underwent chemoradiation delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) has been conducted.

Results: Acute grade 3–4 hematologic and esophagitis toxicities developed in two and three patients respectively. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism during radiotherapy. Seven patients had weight loss ranging from 0 to 30 pounds (median: 4 pounds). Three patients had treatment breaks ranging from 2 to 12 days. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 2–24 months), no patients developed any radiation related toxicities such as grade 3–4 pneumonitis or other long-term complications. The median survival was estimated to be 15 months. There were two local recurrences, three mediastinal recurrences, and six distant metastases.

Conclusion: Grade 3–4 toxicities remained significant during chemoradiation when radiation was delivered with tomotherapy-based IGRT. However, the absence of grade 3–4 pneumonitis is promising and the use of HT needs to be investigated in future prospective studies.

Treatment update in small-cell lung cancer: from limited to extensive disease

OPINION STATEMENT

Small-cell lung cancers are aggressive tumors, often discovered with widespread metastases that include brain involvement. For patients with limited-stage disease, the standard of care is platinum-doublet chemotherapy (often etoposide) with concurrent radiation. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy can be difficult when given upfront, sometimes preventing on-time completion of later chemotherapy cycles. Recent data support giving concurrent chemoradiotherapy following 1 or 2 cycles of chemotherapy alone. For patients with extensive disease, chemotherapy alone remains the standard of care. For patients with limited or extensive disease who achieve clinical benefit from primary therapy, consideration of prophylactic cranial radiation should be made. Despite aggressive use of these treatments, most patients will have life-threatening disease return, sometimes very soon after finishing treatment. For those patients who are candidates for additional systemic treatment, several single-agent options exist, such as topotecan, paclitaxel, or even consideration of retreating with the same initial regimen depending on how effective it was. All patients with SCLC should be considered for clinical trials, because this remains our greatest hope for finding more effective therapies.

Dosimetric rationale and early experience at UFPTI of thoracic proton therapy and chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Treatment with conventional x-ray therapy (XRT) is associated with high toxicity rates, particularly acute grade 3+ esophagitis and pneumonitis. We present outcomes for the first known series of limited-stage SCLC patients treated with proton therapy and a dosimetric comparison of lung and esophageal doses with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six patients were treated: five concurrently and one sequentially. Five patients received 60-66 CGE in 30-34 fractions once daily and one patient received 45 CGE in 30 fractions twice daily. All six patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v3.0, was used to grade toxicity. IMRT plans were also generated and compared with proton plans.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 12.0 months. The one-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 83% and 66%, respectively. There were no cases of acute grade 3+ esophagitis or acute grade 2+ pneumonitis, and no other acute grade 3+ non-hematological toxicities were seen. One patient with a history of pulmonary fibrosis and atrial fibrillation developed worsening symptoms four months after treatment requiring oxygen. Three patients died: two of progressive disease and one after a fall; the latter patient was disease-free at 36 months after treatment. Another patient recurred and is alive, while two patients remain disease-free at 12 months of follow-up. Proton therapy proved superior to IMRT across all esophageal and lung dose volume points.

CONCLUSION

In this small series of SCLC patients treated with proton therapy with radical intent, treatment was well tolerated with no cases of acute grade 3+ esophagitis or acute grade 2+ pneumonitis. Dosimetric comparison showed better sparing of lung and esophagus with proton therapy. Proton therapy merits further investigation as a method of reducing the toxicity of CRT.

Treatment of lung cancer

Lung cancer is a heterogenous disease with 2 main subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Early-stage NSCLC is managed primarily by surgical resection, with adjuvant chemotherapy for selected patients with stage IB, II, and III disease. Patients with locally advanced stage III NSCLC are usually treated with combined modality therapy. Advanced NSCLC remains an incurable disease. Further advances will rely on improvements in understanding of the molecular events driving the malignant phenotype and the development of novel, targeted therapeutic strategies.

Chemoradiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for small-cell lung cancer. A third of small-cell lung cancer patients present with limited disease; in this population, thoracic radiotherapy caused a 14% reduction in the mortality rate, and benefit in terms of overall survival at 3 years was 5.4% as compared with chemotherapy alone. Although the optimal schedule and volume of thoracic radiotherapy remain controversial, early twice-daily concurrent radiotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin is recommended. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended for patients with any response to first-line treatment. Maintenance and dose-intense treatment is not recommended outside of clinical trials. Large randomized trials that compare standard-dose radiation therapy of 45 Gy in twice-daily fractions for 3 weeks with once-daily schedules with a higher total dose are ongoing. The incorporation of new drugs is warranted for future combined modality treatment.

Quality-of-life concerns in lung cancer patients

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths for both men and women across the world. In the past, studies on lung cancer have focused on traditional end points such as survival, disease-free survival or local control. More recently, investigators have begun to appreciate the importance of health-related quality-of-life outcomes, particularly in the setting of lung cancer. This article provides an overview of the importance, methodology, analysis and presentation of health-related quality of life in lung cancer trials, and also discusses some of the limitations and challenges of such studies.