Temozolomide for advanced, metastatic melanoma

Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Melanoma: Analysis of a Single-Institution Database

Background

Many new agents are currently in trial in melanoma. It remains unclear, however, what the benefit of a given therapy may be since information on progression-free and overall survival of untreated patients is limited. Since few trials in melanoma have had a non-treated cohort, it remains unclear what survival can be expected in patients who are not treated with chemotherapy.

Methods

To help develop parameters for future trials, we analyzed treatment history and survival in 212 patients with metastatic melanoma seen at our institution between January 1998 and September 2003. A retrospective analysis was done using a database created for melanoma patients at our center. Patient survival information was determined from this database, tumor registry, Social Security index, and direct patient calls. Patient staging information was determined according to the 2001 guidelines. Non–chemotherapy-treated patients with M1c disease were used as “controls.”

Results

The median survival of stage M1c melanoma was 6.0 months. Survival was longer for stage M1a and M1b and shorter in older patients. No significant differences were found in survival based on gender. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, those with progressive disease on treatment or with increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) fared worse than those with a clinical response or normal LDH, respectively. Patients treated with either biochemotherapy or temozolomide and thalidomide survived longer than those who received no chemotherapy treatment. Dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment did not prolong survival.

Conclusions

In this retrospective review of patients treated at a single institution, those treated with multiagent chemotherapy but not with single-agent DTIC appeared to have had a survival benefit.

Metastatic Melanoma: Insights Into the Evolution of the Treatments and Future Challenges

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. While associated survival prognosis is good when diagnosed early, it dramatically drops when melanoma progresses into its metastatic form. Prior to 2011, the favored therapies include interleukin-2 and chemotherapies, regardless of their low efficiency and their toxicity. Following key biological findings, two new types of therapy have been approved. First, there are the targeted therapies, which rely on small molecule B-Raf and MEK inhibitors and allow the treatment of patients with B-Raf mutated melanoma. Second, there are the immunotherapies, with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies that are used for patients harboring a B-Raf wild-type status. Both approaches have significantly improved patient survival, compared with alkylating agents, in the treatment of unresectable melanoma. Herein, we review the evolution of the treatment of melanoma starting from early discoveries to current therapies. A focus will be provided on drug discovery, synthesis, and mode of action of relevant drugs and the future directions of the domain to overcome the emergence of the resistance events.

Melanoma patients in a phase I clinic: molecular aberrations, targeted therapy and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to assess the outcome of patients with advanced melanoma treated with matched molecularly targeted therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 160 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated in the phase I program (N = 35 protocols). Treatment was considered to be 'matched' (N = 84) if at least one drug in the regimen was known to inhibit the functional activity of at least one of the patient's mutations.

RESULTS

Of 160 patients, 134 (83.7%) had adequate tissue for molecular analysis; 69% (110 of 160) had ≥1 mutation: 61.2% (82 of 134), BRAF; 20.7% (23 of 111), NRAS; 2.6% (2 of 77), KIT; 2.3% (1 of 44), KRAS; 20% (1 of 5), GNAQ; 11.1% (1 of 9), P53 and 2.6% (1 of 39), coexisting mutations in BRAF and PIK3CA. Eighty-four patients (52.4%) were treated with matched-targeted agents, most of whom had BRAF mutations (N = 74). Twenty-six percent of patients (41 of 160) achieved a complete or partial remission (CR/PR) [40% (34 of 84)) on a matched phase I protocol versus 9.2% (7 of 76) for those on a non-matched study (P ≤ 0.0001)]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% CI) was longer for patients treated on a matched phase I trial than on their prior first standard treatment [5.27 (4.10, 6.44) versus 3.10 (1.92, 4.28) months, P = 0.023], but not on non-matched phase I treatment. Multivariable analysis showed that matched therapy was an independent predictor of higher CR/PR rates, prolonged PFS and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For melanoma patients, especially those with BRAF mutations, administering molecularly matched agents can be associated with better outcomes, including longer PFS compared with their first-line systemic therapy.

Angiogenesis in gliomas

Angiogenesis, the sprouting of new blood vessels from preexisting blood vessels, is a hallmark of glioma progression. Malignant gliomas are among the most lethal tumors with a very dismal prognosis, despite advances in standard therapy, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The median survival of patients with malignant gliomas has changed little in the last few years and is still measured in months. In an attempt to develop new therapeutic strategies and identify the molecular mechanism involved in glioma growth and progression, there has been extraordinary scientific interest in the past 2 decades in angiogenic responses associated with gliomas. This chapter focuses on the molecular mechanism of glioma angiogenesis and summarizes some of the therapeutic approaches based on antiangiogenesis.

Thalidomide in multiple myeloma--clinical trials and aspects of drug metabolism and toxicity

BACKGROUND

After the tragic events in the early 1960s, thalidomide has re-emerged as therapeutic for multiple myeloma (MM). It was first approved for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum, and is now under evaluation for hematologic and non-hematologic disorders. Its complex mechanism of action is not fully understood; however extensive preclinical studies in MM have revealed its antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we focus on the importance and toxicity of thalidomide in today's clinical use.

METHODS

Key preclinical and clinical trials available as well as data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of thalidomide in humans are summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Thalidomide is widely used as first-line treatment and in relapsed/refractory MM. The most common side effects are fatigue, constipation and peripheral neuropathy, and careful monitoring is required to avoid fetal exposure.

Advances in molecular therapies in patients with brain tumors

BACKGROUND

We are witnessing the development of new treatment modalities for primary brain tumors. An area under intense investigation is the use of small molecules targeting intracellular signaling pathways that interfere with growth, invasion, and metastasis of high-grade gliomas.

METHODS

We review clinical trials of small molecules in adults with brain tumors. This search included electronic databases, specialty journals, textbooks, proceedings, and Web sites of the National Cancer Institute and other cooperative brain tumor groups in Europe and the United States.

RESULTS

Several drugs with the ability to down-regulate the growth and invasion of malignant gliomas are at various stages of testing. Most of these focus on interfering with oncogenic and tumor survival pathways. Examples include inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, farnesyltransferases, and matrix metalloproteinases. These molecules are at different stages of testing, and a conclusive picture of which drug is most effective, either alone or in combination, needs better definition. The metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat with temozolomide has given the best results to date in phase II trials, increasing the rate of 6-month progression-free survival for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

As our understanding of the biology of gliomas increases and new drugs targeting specific molecular pathways enter well-designed cooperative trials, the control and prognosis of these tumors should improve.