Phase I evaluation of sequential doxorubicin gemcitabine then ifosfamide paclitaxel cisplatin for patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract

Analysis of the factors influencing the survival time of patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to identify the factors influencing the survival time of patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC). Between January 2000 and September 2017, a total of 21 patients were enrolled, all of whom were diagnosed with SRCC. In total, eight prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, a log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards model. The log-rank test results revealed that there was a significant association between the proportion of sarcoma elements and survival time of patients with SRCC (P<0.05). In addition, there was a significant association between post-operative drug treatment and SRCC survival time (P<0.05). The results of the Kaplan-Meier estimate demonstrated that the survival curve of post-operative drug treatment was significantly greater compared with the survival curve of patients who did not undergo drug treatment (P<0.05). The survival curve of patients with a proportion of sarcoma elements <50% was significantly greater compared with the survival curve of patients with a proportion of sarcoma elements ≥50% (P<0.05). Furthermore, the Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that the mortality risk in post-operative patients without drug treatment was 5.822 times greater compared with that of patients with drug treatment (P<0.05). Mortality risk in patients with a proportion of sarcoma elements ≥50% was 4.682 times higher compared with that of patients with sarcoma elements <50% (P<0.05). Finally, post-operative drug therapy was revealed to be a protective factor which significantly affected the survival time of patients with SRCC [risk ratio (RR)=0.172], in addition to the proportion of sarcoma elements ≥50% (RR=4.682). In conclusion, drug therapy should be promoted upon patient diagnosis with SRCC and attention should be given to the proportion of sarcomatoid components.

Advanced bladder cancer: new agents and new approaches. A review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present paper is to review findings from the most relevant studies and evaluate the potential of new drugs in treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and Pubmed databases up to 2009 using both medical subject heading (Mesh) and a free text strategy with the name of known individual chemotherapeutic drug and the following key words: 'muscle-invasive bladder cancer', 'urothelial/transitional carcinoma', 'chemotherapeutics drugs and agents'. At the end of our research in literature we selected 63 articles and we have considered only studies in which almost 30 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the gold standard of treatment for clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. While more extensive lymph node dissection may have both prognostic and therapeutic significance, effective systemic therapies that eliminate micrometastases may improve outcome. Perioperative chemotherapy can be administered before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) cystectomy to eradicate subclinical disease and to improve survival.

CONCLUSION

The challenge remains as to how to integrate all of the relevant knowledge and data in a systematic manner so that researchers can gain the knowledge needed to devise the best therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. Future improvements in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer will rely not only on the optimization of currently available cytotoxic agents but also on the biologic profile of individual patient tumors and the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy.

Current chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer: a review

Advanced bladder cancer is a disease with a high recurrence rate and metastatic capacity exhibiting a poor outcome. The pathologic stage and nodal involvement are independent prognostic factors for survival after cystectomy, and in locally advanced or metastatic disease, the performance status and the presence of visceral metastases have been correlated with treatment outcome. The regimen methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (MVAC) has been the treatment of choice for decades and later the combination of cisplatin with gemcitabine became also the new standard of care, by demonstrating a more favorable toxicity profile. Also, carboplatin-gemcitabine and taxanes have been useful alternatives for patients unfit for cisplatin-based treatment. Additionally, the evaluation of certain chemotherapeutic agents has produced promising results in the second-line setting. Lastly, the past decade has provided information on the molecular mechanism of bladder cancer offering a personalized approach and optimizing the management of the disease.

Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of high-risk urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite definitive surgery, the survival of patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma (UC) is poor. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy may be beneficial, but it is restricted by the need for normal renal function (RF). Sequential administration of adjuvant chemotherapy facilitates drug delivery and improves survival in patients with breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and survival impact of adjuvant, sequential chemotherapy in patients with high-risk UC.

METHODS

Fifty patients were treated on 2 simultaneous protocols between 1997 and 2004. The patients on Protocol A (normal RF) received doxorubicin and gemcitabine (AG) followed by paclitaxel and cisplatin. The patients on Protocol B (impaired RF) received AG followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared with a group of 203 contemporary control patients who had similar pathology and RF and who underwent surgery alone.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of protocol patients was 6.5 years (range, 0.9-8.6 years), and 25 patients remained alive. The median follow-up of the control group was 4.7 years (0.0-9.2), and 68 patients remained alive. The median OS for patients on Protocol A was greater than that for controls who had good RF (4.6 years vs 2.5 years; P = .03). The median OS for patients on Protocol B was greater than that for controls who had impaired RF (3.4 years vs 2 years; P = .04). DSS for the protocol and matched control groups was similar (good RF: 4.6 years vs 3 years; P = .24; impaired RF: 3.4 years vs 3.3 years; P = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized study, adjuvant, sequential chemotherapy for patients with high-risk UC did not improve DSS over that observed with surgery alone.

Final results of sequential doxorubicin plus gemcitabine and ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

PURPOSE

Sequential chemotherapy with doxorubicin and gemcitabine (AG) followed by ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) was previously demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and to additionally define toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with advanced TCC received AG every 2 weeks for five or six cycles followed by ITP every 21 days for four cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given between cycles.

RESULTS

Myelosuppression was seen with 68% of patients who experienced grades 3 to 4 neutropenia and with 25% who experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicities were infrequent. Forty (73%) of 55 evaluable patients (95% CI, 59% to 84%) demonstrated a major response (complete, n = 19; partial, n = 21) and had a median response duration of 11.3 months (range, 1.7 to >or= 105.6 months). Twenty-seven (79%) of 34 patients with locally advanced disease (ie, T4, N0, M0) or with regional lymph node involvement (ie, T3-4, N1, M0) and 10 (56%) of 18 patients with distant metastases achieved a major response. The median progression-free survival was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 14.8 months), and the median overall survival was 16.4 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 22.5 months). At a median follow-up of 76.4 months, seven (11.7%) patients remain alive, and all were disease free.

CONCLUSION

AG plus ITP is an active regimen in previously untreated patients with advanced TCC; however, it is associated with toxicity and does not clearly offer a benefit compared with other nonsequential, cisplatin-based regimens.

Simultaneous delivery of doxorubicin and gemcitabine to tumors in vivo using prototypic polymeric drug carriers

Copolymers of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) are prototypic and well-characterized polymeric drug carriers that have been broadly implemented in the delivery of anticancer therapeutics. To demonstrate that polymers, as liposomes, can be used for simultaneously delivering multiple chemotherapeutic agents to tumors in vivo, we have synthesized and evaluated an HPMA-based polymer-drug conjugate carrying 6.4wt% of gemcitabine, 5.7wt% of doxorubicin and 1.0mol% of tyrosinamide (to allow for radiolabeling). The resulting construct, i.e. poly(HPMA-co-MA-GFLG-gemcitabine-co-MA-GFLG-doxorubicin-co-MA-TyrNH(2)), was termed P-Gem-Dox, and was shown to effectively kill cancer cells in vitro, to circulate for prolonged period of time, to localize to tumors relatively selectively, and to inhibit tumor growth. As compared to control regimens, P-Gem-Dox increased the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and doxorubicin without increasing its toxicity, and it more strongly inhibited angiogenesis and induced apoptosis. These findings demonstrate that passively tumor-targeted polymeric drug carriers can be used for delivering two different chemotherapeutic agents to tumors simultaneously, and they thereby set the stage for more elaborate analyses on the potential of polymer-based multi-drug targeting.

New agents for treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma

The prognosis for any patient with progressive or recurrent invasive transitional cell carcinoma remains poor. In this context, the focus of clinical research in these invasive cancers concentrates on identifying systemic treatment options and new agents in order to improve survival of patients. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer; however, despite regimens as the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination, the overall response rates vary between 40% and 65%, with complete response in 15%-25% with survivals up to 16 months. This survival is frequently achieved with severe and life-threatening side effects. None the less, almost all responding patients relapse within the first year; therefore, the need for development of new and tolerable agents is urgent. This review highlights some new active chemotherapeutic as new platinum compounds (oxaliplatin, lobaplatin), gallium nitrate, ifosfamide, the antifolates piritrexim and pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514), vinflunine and molecular targeting agents such as farnesyltransferase inhibitors (lonafarnib, R115777, SCH66336), ribozyme (RPI.4610), histone deacetylase inhibitor (CI-994) and monoclonal antibodies (epidermal growth factor receptor, Her 2/neu).

Chemotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Bladder Cancer

Cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and vinblastine (M-VAC) combination chemotherapy has been the historic standard of care in patients with advanced urothelial tumors. Phase III trials have evaluated new combinations such as gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), carboplatin/paclitaxel, docetaxel/cisplatin, and interferon-alpha/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin. However, these new regimens have failed to demonstrate superiority in terms of overall survival when compared with classic M-VAC. The GC doublet has proved to be a new standard treatment alternative based on an improved toxicity profile and similar survival results. The addition of a third agent (paclitaxel) to this regimen is the focus of a phase III trial. However, long-term follow-up with classical and new regimens (doublets and triplets) still show limited efficacy and emphasize the need to identify more active treatment. For "unfit" patients, ie, those unable to receive cisplatin-based regimens, conventional regimens include methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine (M-CAVI), carboplatin-gemcitabine, carboplatin-paclitaxel, gemcitabine-taxane, or monotherapy with either gemcitabine, carboplatin, or a taxane. New drugs, including pemetrexed and vinflunine, are now being studied for salvage therapy. In addition to new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, chemotherapy optimization using molecular characteristics to predict chemosensitivity is emerging.

Chemotherapy practices and perspectives in invasive bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in adult patients. Two-thirds of patients have superficial tumors and their treatment is conservative. Nevertheless, 30% of superficial tumors become infiltrative and represent a third of tumors at initial diagnosis. Overall mortality from bladder cancer is 30%. Important molecular events may explain the carcinogenesis and evolution of these tumors. Infiltrating bladder cancers are currently treated by radical cystectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated a positive impact on patients' outcomes before cystectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after cystectomy is currently being studied in an international randomized trial. Patients with advanced disease are treated by chemotherapy with palliative intentions. Two regimens are standard: the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin, and the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. The addition of paclitaxel to the latter regimen is the subject of ongoing study. Only a few patients have long-term nonevolutive disease. Research must be focused on the combination of chemotherapy and targeted drugs directed through gene methylation, cytokine-receptor activation and signaling pathways.

Phase I trial of gemcitabine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (GAP) in patients with advanced solid tumors

A phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II dose, safety profile and anti-tumor activity of a combination regimen of gemcitabine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (GAP). Gemcitabine (G) and doxorubicin (A) were administered on days 1 and 8 at increasing doses (starting level 800 and 15 mg/m, respectively). Cisplatin (P) was given at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m2 (day 1). Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Nineteen patients received 76 cycles of treatment. A and G were escalated up to 20 and 1000 mg/m2, and finally de-escalated to 15 and 800 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever that was observed in 21% of the patients. Non-hematological toxicities included mild/moderate nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue, observed in 58, 37, 21 and 95% of the patients, respectively. Of 19 patients with evaluable disease, six patients had a partial response yielding an overall response rate of 31.6 % (95% confidence interval 12.6-56.6%) by intention-to-treat. We conclude that GAP is an active and tolerable treatment combination, with minimal visceral organ toxicities.

State-of-the-art management of metastatic disease at initial presentation or recurrence

Carcinoma of the bladder is the second most prevalent genitourinay malignancy and the fifth most common solid tumor in the USA. On the basis of favorable response rates and survival data, cisplatin-based regimens can be considered the standard treatment for fit patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Since cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, gemcitabine plus either paclitaxel or docetaxel may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for these patients. Randomized trials are needed to determine the future role of these combinations in the management of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. The optimal regimens for the medically unfit patients and second-line chemotherapy remain undefined. Postchemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in a disease-free survival in highly selected patients who would otherwise die of the disease. Progresses in the understanding of the molecular biology of bladder cancer and identification of new targeted therapies will undoubtedly provide new opportunities but whether or not this approach to therapy will lead to better results must still be determined.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer

Although metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and urothelium commonly responds to first-line chemotherapy, eventual progression is nearly universal. Current salvage therapy for progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy is ineffective, and such patients are candidates for clinical trials. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves long-term outcome and provides an exciting paradigm for the rapid development of systemic therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation also facilitates bladder conservation in patients who attain pathologic complete remission. Definitive data supporting adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking. With the unraveling of bladder cancer biology and the discovery of novel agents targeting several carcinogenic pathways, the future of therapy for transitional cell carcinoma appears promising.

Systemic chemotherapy options for metastatic bladder cancer

Systemic chemotherapy has reached a therapeutic plateau in the treatment of transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelium. Since the advent of the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) in the 1980s, no chemotherapy regimen has been proven to be superior to this therapy. Only one regimen, a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin, has been equivalent. With a similar response rate and survival, plus the benefit of an improved toxicity profile, the gemcitabine cisplatin combination has largely supplanted MVAC in physician's practices. Although a recent dose-intense version of MVAC has shown an improved toxicity profile compared with traditional MVAC, it is clear that, for many patients, a full-dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen may not be a tolerable option. Tobacco use, which is a common risk factor predisposing for the development of transitional cell carcinoma, may also cause morbidities that preclude treatment with aggressive combination therapy. Therefore, there is a clear need for regimens with improved toxicity, especially for the frequently frail or elderly patient population with poor renal function. There is an additional unmet requirement in rare bladder tumors, for which treatment has traditionally been based upon anecdotal evidence, limited by small patient numbers. Currently, there is newfound hope for all bladder cancer patients, with investigators studying new combinations and novel treatment paradigms, with recent studies focusing on frail, or 'cisplatin-unfit', patients and additional studies in the setting of rare small cell or urachal carcinoma patients.

Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

M-VAC (cisplatin, methotrexate, adriamycin, vinblastine) combination chemotherapy has been for long time the standard of care in fit patient with advanced urothelial tumors. Gemcitabine/cisplatin with similar results and an improved toxicity profile has proved to be a new standard alternative. Whether or not we can improve survival with newer triplet regimens will depend upon the results of ongoing phase III trials. In addition to the new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, new approaches are emerging for treatment. Chemotherapy optimization using molecular markers predicting chemosensitivity are being applied. There is an obvious need to incorporate in clinical trials a systematic translational approach to explain both our successes and our failures.

Systemic chemotherapy in inoperable or metastatic bladder cancer

Urothelial cancer is a common malignancy. The management of patients with recurrent disease after cystectomy or initially metastatic or unresectable disease represents a therapeutic challenge. Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival but long-term survival remains infrequent. During recent years there has been improvement due to the use of novel chemotherapeutic agents, mainly gemcitabine and the taxanes. The long-considered-standard MVAC has been challenged by combinations showing more favourable toxicity profiles and equal (gemcitabine-cisplatin) or even improved (dose-dense, G-CSF-supported MVAC) efficacy. Specific interest has also been generated in specific groups of patients (elderly patients, patients with renal function impairment or comorbidities), who are not fit for the standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy but can derive significant benefit from carboplatin- or taxane-based treatment. Retrospective analyses have enabled the identification of groups of patients with different prognoses, who possibly require different therapeutic approaches. Modern chemotherapy offers a chance of long-term survival in patients without visceral metastases, possibly in combination with definitive local treatment. Finally, the progress of targeted therapies in other neoplasms seems to be reflected in advanced bladder cancer by recent studies indicating that biological agents can be combined with modern chemotherapy. The true role of such therapies is currently being evaluated.

The role of taxanes in the management of bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a chemo-sensitive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Among the most important of these newer agents are taxanes. Whereas taxane-containing regimens have not yet been shown to improve the survival of patients with transitional cell carcinoma in randomized trials, ongoing phase III trials will further define the role of these agents in both the perioperative and advanced disease settings.

Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Mitoxantrone/prednisone ameliorates symptoms in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) but has no effect on survival. Docetaxel (Taxotere)/estramustine improves response but with significant toxicity. We reasoned that a sequential administration of the two regimens could be a viable alternative for delivering full doses of chemotherapy, avoiding overlapping toxicity and preserving dose intensity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty HRPC patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks, plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, for three cycles, followed by estramustine phosphate, 280 mg three times daily, days 1 to 5, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 2, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 10 cycles.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. After mitoxantrone/prednisone treatment, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 23%, which increased to 63% after completion of sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine treatment (12 partial and 7 complete responses). With a median follow-up of 18 months, median survival for all patients was 18 months, and median progression-free survival was 10 months. The mitoxantrone/prednisone regimen was well tolerated, and the only grade 3-4 toxicity was grade 3 neutropenia in four (13%) patients. Twenty-nine patients received a total of 173 cycles of docetaxel/estramustine (median, 6 cycles/patient). Six (20%) patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and two (6%) patients had febrile neutropenia episodes. The most frequent non-hematological toxic effects were asthenia, nausea and vomiting, edemas and onycholysis. Two (6%) patients had deep venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in HRPC. Sequential therapy is feasible and can be used to integrate novel, more active regimens.

Active chemotherapy for sarcomatoid and rapidly progressing renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is generally ineffective in patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and in patients with rapidly progressive metastatic or locally recurrent disease, with a median time to progression of approximately 2 months and a median survival of 4-7 months. Gemcitabine-based regimens have modest antitumor activity, whereas doxorubicin is often used to treat sarcomatoid RCC. Based on the antitumor activity of doxorubicin and gemcitabine in collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney, the authors used this combination to treat selected patients with sarcomatoid or rapidly progressing RCC.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (11 males and 7 females; median age, 53 years; range, 31-81 years) with RCC (56% sarcomatoid; 44% other) were treated at 2 institutions in a collaborative study that was not institutional review board reviewed. Seven patients received previous treatment with interferon or interleukin-2. Sites of metastases included the lung, soft tissue, bone, liver, and brain with 88% of patients having > or = 3 sites of disease. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 or 2000 mg/m2) every 2-3 weeks with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support.

RESULTS

A median of 5 courses was administered (range, 2-12 cycles). Therapy was well tolerated with no Grade 4 toxicities. Two patients had a complete response, five had a partial response, three had a mixed response, and one had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2-21+ months).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that the combination of doxorubicin and gemcitabine has antitumor activity in patients with sarcomatoid RCC or with rapidly progressing RCC. A prospective investigation of this combination in RCC is warranted.

A Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer

This Phase II trial was designed to evaluate the overall objective response rate, complete response rate, efficacy, and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin (Paraplatin) in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Thirty-three patients with measurable, unresectable, stage III-IV carcinoma of the urothelium were enrolled. Paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=2) were given by intravenous (IV) infusion weekly x 6 followed by two weeks rest. Patients were premedicated with oral dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetadine (or equivalent). Patient characteristics included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0 (36%), one (36%), two (28%); median age 70 years (37-83); 29 (88%) male, four (12%) female; 16 (48%) patients had prior chemotherapy [eight postoperative (adjuvant), five neoadjuvant, three for metastatic disease] and eight (24%) had prior radiation therapy. Eight patients (24%) achieved objective responses, three complete responses (CR) and five partial responses (PR); one patient was not evaluable (patient died prior to first dose). The median duration of response was 13 months (range, 2-29). Nine patients (27%) had stable disease (SD) and 15 patients (45%) had progressive disease (PD). Median time to progression was 3.6 months (range, < 1-29) and median survival was 10.3 months (range, < 1-33). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included: asthenia (46%), neutropenia (36%), leukopenia (15%), thromboembolism (12%), diarrhea (9%), nausea and vomiting (9%), hyperglycemia (7%), and neuropathy (6%). Two patients died of sepsis, one death was treatment-related. Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin shows promising activity; however in the current study, efficacy may have been limited by the toxicities associated with this dose-intensive regimen in an elderly, pretreated patient population with poor performance status. This regimen warrants further study, perhaps as a three out of four week regimen or at reduced doses.

Is There a Role for Surgery in the Management of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer? The M. D. Anderson Experience

PURPOSE

Although rarely curative, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer. The role of surgery for metastatic disease is not well established for urothelial cancer, but is sometimes undertaken in the face of persistent or recurrent disease that can be surgically resected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 31 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer undergoing metastasectomy with the intent of rendering them free of disease. All gross disease was completely resected in 30 patients (97%). The most frequently resected location was lung in 24 cases (77%), followed by distant lymph nodes in 4 (13%), brain in 2 (7%) and a subcutaneous metastasis in 1 (3%).

RESULTS

Median survival from diagnosis of metastases and from time of metastasectomy was 31 and 23 months, respectively. The 5-year survival from metastasectomy was 33%. Median time to progression following metastasectomy was 7 months. Five patients were alive and free of disease for more than 3 years after metastasectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results in this highly selected cohort, with 33% alive at 5 years after metastasectomy, suggest that resection of metastatic disease is feasible and may contribute to long-term disease control especially when integrated with chemotherapy. Further prospective studies should be undertaken to better characterize the selection criteria and benefit from this intervention.

Treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma with alternating paclitaxel, methotrexate, cisplatin (TMP) and 5-fluorouracil, α-interferon, cisplatin (FAP)

We assessed the activity and safety of a biochemotherapy regimen in which courses of paclitaxel, methotrexate, and cisplatin were alternated with courses of 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, and cisplatin in the treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the phase I portion, 15 patients were treated according to an escalating dosage regimen designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose. A total of 30 patients received treatment according to the maximum tolerated dose regimen: methotrexate (30 mg/m(2)) given iv on days 1 and 22; paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given iv over 3 h on day 1; cisplatin (70 and 25 mg/m(2)) administered iv on days 1 and 22, respectively; 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) given iv by continuous infusion daily for 5 days beginning on day 22; and alpha-interferon (4 mIU/m(2)) given SC daily for 5 days simultaneously with the 5-fluorouracil infusions. The regimen was repeated at 42-day intervals. The 40 treated patients had an overall response rate of 43%, a complete response rate of 18%, and a median survival time of 44 weeks. Most of the toxic effects were hematologic: Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% of patients (12 patients) and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 20% (8 patients). Even though this alternating biochemotherapy regimen was active for patients with refractory urothelial carcinoma, its activity was not better than that of certain single cytotoxic agents. Furthermore, the complicated dosing schedule and toxic effects of the regimen precluded its routine use in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

New drugs and new approaches in metastatic bladder cancer

The median survival of patients with metastatic cancer of the urothelium who receive best supportive care only in 4-6 months. With the introduction of combination chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin and methotrexate for the management of metastatic urothelial cancer, median overall survival has doubled. Nevertheless, death due to cancer ultimately occurs in more than 80% of these patients, thus more effective therapy is required. The new available treatment modalities range from new combinations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents to combinations incorporating novel drugs like gemcitabine and the taxanes. These new combinations incorporate the new active agents in two, three or multiple drug combinations, administered either in one regimen or sequentially in various combinations and schedules intended to improve the outcome of bladder cancer patients. Ongoing phase III studies will help to define the role of these new combinations in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer. The improved understanding of the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies is helping to define the role of new prognostic indices that can direct the most appropriate choice of treatment for advanced disease. In addition, advances in the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies may allow identification of specific genetic lesions and biochemical pathways upon which future therapeutic approaches can be focused. The integration of newer biologic agents, probably to supplement rather than to supplant chemotherapeutic drugs, should be a primary direction of research with the objective to interfere with multiple aspects of bladder cancer progression.

Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, pemetrexed and other newer agents in urothelial and kidney cancers

Significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of urothelial and kidney cancers. Approaches to advanced urothelial cancer include dose intensification, reducing toxicity in unfit or elderly patients, doublet and triplet combination chemotherapy and sequential regimens. Promising new chemotherapeutic agents such as the epothilones, pemetrexed (Alimta), topoisomerase inhibitors and vinflunine act at different phases of the cell cycle and on folate metabolism. New agents that are combined with chemotherapy in urothelial cancer include the farnesyl transferase inhibitors and growth factors receptor inhibitors. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is particularly resistant to cytotoxic agents, although a gemcitabine/fluorinated pyrimidine combination may have modest but real clinical benefit. In metastatic RCC, new biologic and targeted therapies include anti-angiogenesis agents such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody and thalidomide, as well as toremifene, CCI-779 and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Metastatic urothelial and renal cell cancers continue to be the clinical trial focus of many novel agents. The molecular biology of these diseases is being unravelled and as knowledge accumulates, our ability to target these cancers will continue to increase.

Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Genitourinary Committee has developed a broad range of clinical trials across most stages of bladder cancer. Recurrence rates of superficial bladder cancer after transurethral resection range from 50-70%. Although adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guerin reduces the risk of disease recurrence or progression, only 30% of patients have long-term disease-free survival. Because the development of novel secondline agents is needed, the CALGB is evaluating the utility of intravesicle gemcitabine as well as an oral proapoptotic agent (CP-461). In patients with locally advanced disease with an increased risk of disease recurrence after cystectomy, a randomized trial of conventional chemotherapy versus sequential dose-dense therapy is under development. The gemcitabine/cisplatin combination has become a commonly used regimen for the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). The CALGB is undertaking a Phase II study that incorporates a fixed dose rate gemcitabine infusion in this regimen, together with a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Iressa (Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, DE). In patients with renal insufficiency, a regimen of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and Iressa is planned. Novel agents, including arsenic trioxide and trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), are being evaluated as secondline therapy in patients with advanced TCC who have disease progression after frontline therapy.

Progress in the chemotherapy of metastatic cancer of the urinary tract

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has an evolving role in the management of metastatic cancer of the bladder and urinary tract. The most responsive of these tumors are transitional cell carcinomas. Standard single agents (e.g., methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitomycin, ifosfamide, vinblastine, and cisplatin) have produced objective response rates of 15-25% and combination chemotherapy has resulted in objective regression in 40-75% of cases. The taxanes and gemcitabine are now being incorporated into combination regimens because they have activity against this disease, both in previously treated and untreated patients. In previously untreated patients, regimens incorporating gemcitabine and paclitaxel and a platinum complex, with or without ifosfamide or doxorubicin, produce median survival periods of 15-20 months. Contemporary experience with the methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin regimen yields a median survival period of 18 months. Traditional cytotoxic regimens have been ineffective in the management of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. However, regimens predicated on the taxanes and gemcitabine yield response rates of 30-40%, which may translate into improved survival. Nevertheless, stage migration may produce the semblance of improved survival, which may reflect reduced tumor burden (via reclassification) and case selection. Because historically controlled comparisons may introduce errors from case selection bias, stage migration, differences in duration of follow-up, and the evolution of supportive care, it is essential to validate the role of new agents in well structured, randomized clinical trials.

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in breast and ovarian carcinoma patients. We conducted a Phase I trial to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of this combination in patients with advanced malignancies.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with refractory or recurrent malignancies were enrolled in this dose escalation trial. Dose escalation proceeded from a starting level of PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) administered on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

The MTD was PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2) administered on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity, a Grade 3 rash, was observed in one patient during Cycle 1 and Grade 3 stomatitis and a rash were observed in a second patient during Cycle 2 after administration of PEG-LD 25 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2). Other side effects included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, nausea, and fatigue. One complete and two partial responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase II dose is PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) with gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A trial with this combination is currently ongoing at this institution comprising patients with refractory ovarian carcinoma.

Pilot study of sequentially applied doublets in poor-prognosis metastatic urothelial cancer

To gather preliminary data on the tolerability of "stacking" sequentially applied regimens in patients recognized to have a poor prognosis from metastatic urothelial cancer. To assess toxicity, especially cumulative myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy, and to characterize the median survival associated with this approach in a high-risk cohort. A total of ten patients were registered and treated. Eight of the 10 demonstrated a major response to treatment (3 patients with complete clinical response, 5 with partial response). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 13.1 months, which is encouraging given the prognostic features of the group. Significantly, we did not appreciate excessive toxicity, and found no peripheral neuropathy of grade 3 or greater. We believe this experience supports the notion that combining individually optimized doublets or triplets will not necessarily be more toxic than multiple cycles of the same regimen. Furthermore, we are encouraged to pursue this line of research in light of promising levels of anti-cancer activity. It is clear however, that even complete responses are all too often short-lived, and that some qualitative change in the impact of cytotoxic therapy is required in order to substantially improve the survival of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

High-risk metastatic urothelial cancer: chances for cure?

The median survival of patients with metastatic bladder cancer treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin chemotherapy is approximately 1 year and long-term survival occurs in a small proportion of patients. Recent efforts to improve the outcome of patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma have focused on the identification of new drugs with single agent activity and on their incorporation into platinum-based combination regimens. Paclitaxel, docetaxel, ifosfamide and gemcitabine are among the most active new agents. A large number of phase I/II trials have evaluated these agents in two- and three-drug combination regimens. The response proportion observed with these combinations varies considerably and median survival times range from 8 to 20 months. Because it is known that pretreatment prognostic features have an impact on individual patient outcome, the variation in reported survival in patients treated with chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer is still controversial. After a significant response to chemotherapy, resection of residual resistant disease may be performed with intent to cure in highly selected patients. As obtainment of complete remission is a prerequisite for long-term survival, new therapeutic strategies, such as molecular targeted small molecule therapy and monoclonal antibodies, and new molecular markers predictive of response have the potential to be incorporated into the current treatment strategies, increasing the rate of cure.

The present and future of combination chemotherapy in bladder cancer

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) has dominated the landscape of chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer for over 15 years. Randomized studies have shown its superiority over cisplatin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. However, it exhibits a significant toxicity profile and achieves only a slight impact on overall survival. Gemcitabine is among the new cytotoxic drugs in development for treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin represents a new standard alternative of treatment in the disease based on similar efficacy to and lower toxicity than the classic MVAC regimen. Future drug development will focus on the clinical usefulness of three-drug regimens (including gemcitabine, paclitaxel or docetaxel, and a platinum salt), and nonplatinum-based combinations, as well as showing the impact of adjuvant postcystectomy chemotherapy on survival.

Phase III trial of fluorouracil, interferon alpha-2b, and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

Previously, we developed a novel biochemotherapy regimen combining interferon alpha-2b with fluorouracil and cisplatin (FAP). We now report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing FAP with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC), the standard chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer treated with these two chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1992 and September 1999, 172 previously untreated patients were registered and randomly assigned to treatment with either FAP or M-VAC. Patients were followed until their death.

RESULTS

The pretreatment clinical characteristics of the groups were similar except for sex (P <.01). Sex did not affect prognosis or survival. The objective response rate for patients assigned to FAP was 42% (35 of 83 patients), with complete response observed in eight (10%) of 83 patients. Among the patients assigned to M-VAC, 51 (59%) of 86 had an objective response, with complete response observed in 21 (24%) of 86. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 12.5 months for both groups. Both regimens were quite toxic, with more mucocutaneous toxicity in the FAP arm and more myelosuppression in the M-VAC arm.

CONCLUSION

Although overall survival was not significantly different, patients assigned to M-VAC had a much better chance of responding to front-line therapy. Thus, FAP is very likely to be inferior to M-VAC and is certainly no less toxic. FAP cannot be recommended as part of the standard armamentarium for urothelial cancer.

Future directions for gemcitabine in the treatment of genitourinary cancer

Because of an annual morbidity of 225,000 patients and mortality of over 56,000 patients per year in the United States from metastatic genitourinary malignancies, there is a great need for new systemic agents. With its activity and low toxicity, gemcitabine has begun to play a growing role in genitourinary cancer treatment and clinical trials. Substantial activity has been reported for gemcitabine combinations in the treatment of bladder cancer (median survival in one study of nearly 20 months) and for gemcitabine alone or in combinations in testicular cancer patients. Lower (but real) levels of activity have also been observed for gemcitabine combinations in renal carcinoma (17% response rate) and for monotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (7%). These data suggest the need for further trials of gemcitabine alone or in combinations in genitourinary cancer patients.

Novel gemcitabine-containing triplets in the management of urothelial cancer

Chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. For a decade, the combination regimen of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin has been considered the standard for these patients. The need for improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of a predominantly palliative therapy has propelled efforts for new drug development. Of the newly identified agents with documented activity, both gemcitabine and paclitaxel have been evaluated with a platinum and have been incorporated into multiagent chemotherapy combinations. Phase II data from two gemcitabine-based triplets are currently available. Combination gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin and gemcitabine/paclitaxel/carboplatin have high levels of activity with overall and complete response rates of 76% and 26%, respectively, for the former and 68% and 32%, respectively, for the latter combination. The role of gemcitabine-based multiagent combinations compared with standard therapy awaits evaluation in prospectively randomized trials.

Phase II multicentre study of docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

A multicentre phase II trial was undertaken to evaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer. Thirty-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder, renal pelvis or ureter received the combination of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 and repeated every 21 days, to a maximum of six cycles. The median delivered dose-intensity was 98% (range 79-102%) of the planned dose for both drugs. There were seven complete responses and 15 partial responses, for and overall response rate of 58% (95% CI, 41-74%). Responses were even seen in three patients with hepatic metastases. The median time to progression was 6.9 months, and the median overall survival was 10.4 months. Two patients who achieved CR status remain free of disease at 4 and 3 years respectively. Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia occurred in 27 patients, resulting in five episodes of febrile neutropenia. There was one toxic death in a patient with grade 4 granulocytopenia who developed acute abdomen. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was rare (one patient). Other grade 3-4 toxicities observed were anaemia (three patients), vomiting (five patients), diarrhoea (four patients), peripheral neuropathy (two patients) and non-neutropenic infections (seven patients). Docetaxel plus cisplatin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, and warrants further investigation.

Active chemotherapy for collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Collecting (Bellini) duct carcinoma (CDC) of the kidney is associated with an aggressive course and an extremely poor prognosis. To the authors' knowledge, there are no standard treatment regimens and neither immunotherapy nor chemotherapy have been found to be effective.

METHODS

In the current study, the authors report a 49-year-old man who presented with a 7.0 cm x 6.0 cm renal mass with extensive regional, paraaortic, and left supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. Radical nephrectomy revealed a CDC. The patient was treated with doxorubicin, 50 mg/m(2) (Day 1), and gemcitabine, 2000 mg/m(2) (Day 1), (AG) every 2 weeks with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) support.

RESULTS

The left supraclavicular lymphadenopathy significantly decreased in size after the first cycle. Computed tomography (CT) scan after the third cycle revealed a significant (68%) reduction in the tumor volume. Toxicity was comprised of only CTC version 2.0, 1998; Grade 1 nausea and fatigue. After Cycle 6, a repeat CT scan demonstrated minimal disease progression. Based on recent Phase II data of an active regimen comprised of AG alternating with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) in patients with transitional cell carcinoma, the patient was treated with ifosfamide, 1500 mg/m(2) (Days 1-3); paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) (Day 1); and cisplatin, 35 mg/m(2) (Days 1 and 2), every 4 weeks with GCSF support. After two cycles of ITP, the patient developed disease progression in bone and received palliative radiation therapy. Follow-up CT scan demonstrated new liver metastases. The patient received palliative care without further chemotherapy and died approximately 10 months after the initial diagnosis of CDC.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistologic and molecular analyses indicate that CDC more closely resembles transitional cell carcinoma than renal cell carcinoma. Chemotherapy regimens used to treat advanced transitional cell carcinoma such as AG should be evaluated as first-line therapy for CDC.

Locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer

Metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is an aggressive neoplasm characterized by rapid growth and dissemination with a median survival of typically less than 1 year. Despite the availability of a myriad of antineoplastics with moderate-significant anti-tumor activity yielding overall response rates in the 40% to 80% range, randomized trials continue to demonstrate median survival rates in the 13- to14-month range, with very limited long-term survival. Subsets of patients with advanced bladder cancer present additional management problems, including those with renal insufficiency or nontransitional-cell histology. Various observers have noted the similarity in treatment outcomes in advanced bladder cancer and extensive small cell lung cancer where chemotherapy produces relatively high response rates but with limited impact on survival. The optimal chemotherapy combination for patients with advanced bladder cancer remains undefined, however, there is increasing recognition that in order to achieve tangible improvements in complete response rates and survival in this disease will likely require a combination of chemotherapy and targeted molecular therapies and in some settings adjunctive surgery.

New chemotherapy combinations for advanced bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium is considered a chemosensitive malignancy. Until recently, the methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin combination has been considered the standard for treating this disease. The development of new chemotherapeutic agents such as gemcitabine and the taxanes has opened up promising new perspectives in the treatment of this disease. However, the preliminary phase II data must be confirmed in adequately conducted phase III trials.

Second-line treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy such as methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin produces durable improvements in survival in only a minority of patients. Therefore, other therapeutic options and strategies are clearly needed. Strategies include increasing the dose of chemotherapy, modifying the sequencing of chemotherapy, and new therapeutic agents. This paper reviews recent work on high-dose chemotherapy, currently available chemotherapeutic agents and combinations, with an emphasis on gemcitabine and the taxanes. New strategies such as monoclonal antibody therapy and molecular targeted small molecule therapy are becoming a reality in the treatment of many diseases. The rationale for using epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapies is also reviewed.