Equivalent racial outcome after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a single departmental experience

Evaluation of Social Determinants of Health and Prostate Cancer Outcomes Among Black and White Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

As the field of medicine strives for equity in care, research showing the association of social determinants of health (SDOH) with poorer health care outcomes is needed to better inform quality improvement strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of SDOH with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) among Black and White patients with prostate cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed of prostate cancer comparative effectiveness research from January 1, 1960, to June 5, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently selected studies conducted among patients within the United States and performed comparative outcome analysis between Black and White patients. Studies were required to report time-to-event outcomes. A total of 251 studies were identified for review.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Three authors independently screened and extracted data. End point meta-analyses were performed using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed, and 2 authors independently reviewed all steps. All conflicts were resolved by consensus.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was PCSM, and the secondary outcome was OS. With the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2030 initiative, an SDOH scoring system was incorporated to evaluate the association of SDOH with the predefined end points. The covariables included in the scoring system were age, comorbidities, insurance status, income status, extent of disease, geography, standardized treatment, and equitable and harmonized insurance benefits. The scoring system was discretized into 3 categories: high (≥10 points), intermediate (5-9 points), and low (<5 points).

RESULTS

The 47 studies identified comprised 1 019 908 patients (176 028 Black men and 843 880 White men; median age, 66.4 years [IQR, 64.8-69.0 years]). The median follow-up was 66.0 months (IQR, 41.5-91.4 months). Pooled estimates found no statistically significant difference in PCSM for Black patients compared with White patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.99-1.19]; P = .08); results were similar for OS (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.95-1.07]; P = .68). There was a significant race-SDOH interaction for both PCSM (regression coefficient, -0.041 [95% CI, -0.059 to 0.023]; P < .001) and OS (meta-regression coefficient, -0.017 [95% CI, -0.033 to -0.002]; P = .03). In studies with minimal accounting for SDOH (<5-point score), Black patients had significantly higher PCSM compared with White patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.41; P < .001). In studies with greater accounting for SDOH variables (≥10-point score), PCSM was significantly lower among Black patients compared with White patients (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that there is a significant interaction between race and SDOH with respect to PCSM and OS among men with prostate cancer. Incorporating SDOH variables into data collection and analyses are vital to developing strategies for achieving equity.

Impact of Race on Outcomes of High-Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in an Equal Access Setting

BACKGROUND

Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) is an accepted treatment for localized prostate cancer; however, limited MHRT data address high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) and/or African American patients. We report clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles for individuals with HRPC treated in an equal access system.

METHODS

We identified patients with HRPC treated with MHRT at a US Department of Veterans Affairs referral center. Exclusion criteria included < 12 months follow-up and elective nodal irradiation. MHRT included 70 Gy over 28 fractions or 60 Gy over 20 fractions. Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Clinical endpoints, including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Clinical outcomes, acute toxicity, and late toxicity-free survival were compared between African American and White patients with logistic regression and log-rank testing.

RESULTS

Between November 2008 and August 2018, 143 patients with HRPC were treated with MHRT and followed for a median of 38.5 months; 82 (57%) were African American and 61 were White patients. Concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was provided for 138 (97%) patients for a median duration of 24 months. No significant differences between African American and White patients were observed for 5-year OS (73% [95% CI, 58%-83%] vs 77% [95% CI, 60%-97%]; P = .55), PCSS (90% [95% CI, 79%-95%] vs 87% [95 % CI, 70%-95%]; P = .57), DMFS (91% [95% CI, 80%-96%] vs 81% [95% CI, 62%-91%]; P = .55), or BRFS (83% [95% CI, 70%-91%] vs 71% [95% CI, 53%-82%]; P = .57), respectively. Rates of acute grade 3+ GU and GI were low overall (4% and 1%, respectively). Late toxicities were similarly favorable with no significant differences by race.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with HRPC treated with MHRT in an equal access setting demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes that did not differ by race, alongside acceptable rates of acute and late toxicities.

African-American Prostate Cancer Disparities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to examine prostate cancer racial disparities specific to the African-American population.

RECENT FINDINGS

African-American men are more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer, present at an earlier age; are more likely to have locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis; and have suboptimal outcomes to standard treatments. Prostate cancer treatment requires a nuanced approach, particularly when applying screening, counseling, and management of African-American men. Oncological as well as functional outcomes may differ and are potentially due to a combination of genetic, molecular, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors.

Curative brachytherapy for prostate cancer in African-Caribbean patients: A retrospective analysis of 370 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer is the most frequent malignancy in African-Caribbean men, a population sharing common genetic traits with African-American (AA) but presenting also genomic and epidemiologic specificities. Despite socioeconomic disparities with French mainland, all patients were treated within the French state-financed equal-access health care system. In this study, we report biochemical outcomes of patients treated by brachytherapy in our department from 2005 to 2014 in an African-Caribbean population.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three hundred seventy consecutive patients receiving ¹²⁵I brachytherapy as a curative treatment for early-stage (localized) disease between 2005 and 2014 were recorded. Selected patients presented with low-risk disease: initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng/mL, clinical stage ≤ T2c, and Gleason score <7. Patients with intermediate risk of recurrence were also included on a case-to-case basis with prostate-specific antigen <15 or Gleason score 7 (3 + 4). Biochemical failure free-survival was defined according to the American Society for Radiation Oncology nadir+2 definition.

RESULTS

The 3-year and 5-year biochemical failure free-survival for the entire cohort were 98.3% and 91.6%, respectively. For patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease, the 5-year BBFS rates were 92.1% and 90.8%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, only Gleason score (<7 vs. 7; p =  0.030 vs. p < 0.05) was a significant predictor of biochemical failure. The overall rate of late and acute Grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxicity was 12.6% and 10.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large single-center series, brachytherapy achieved excellent rates of medium-term biochemical control in both low and selected intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer in African-Caribbean patients. Brachytherapy seems to be an excellent choice of treatment, with excellent outcomes and limited morbidity for African-Caribbean populations.

Prostate cancer in men of African origin

Men of African origin are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer: prostate cancer incidence is highest among men of African origin in the USA, prostate cancer mortality is highest among men of African origin in the Caribbean, and tumour stage and grade at diagnosis are highest among men in sub-Saharan Africa. Socioeconomic, educational, cultural, and genetic factors, as well as variations in care delivery and treatment selection, contribute to this cancer disparity. Emerging data on single-nucleotide-polymorphism patterns, epigenetic changes, and variations in fusion-gene products among men of African origin add to the understanding of genetic differences underlying this disease. On the diagnosis of prostate cancer, when all treatment options are available, men of African origin are more likely to choose radiation therapy or to receive no definitive treatment than white men. Among men of African origin undergoing surgery, increased rates of biochemical recurrence have been identified. Understanding differences in the cancer-survivorship experience and quality-of-life outcomes among men of African origin are critical to appropriately counsel patients and improve cultural sensitivity. Efforts to curtail prostate cancer screening will likely affect men of African origin disproportionately and widen the racial disparity of disease.

Racial parities in outcomes after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Although black patients experience worse outcomes after treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), these conclusions were based on populations in which blacks comprised a minority of patients. The objective of the current study was to determine the impact of race on outcomes in patients with HNSCC who received radiotherapy at an institution in which blacks comprised the majority of patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the authors reviewed 366 black patients and 236 white patients who had nonmetastatic HNSCC for which they received radiotherapy between 1990 and 2012. The primary study outcome measures were locoregional control, freedom from distant metastasis, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 18.3 months for all patients. The 2-year locoregional control rate was 71.9% for black patients compared with 64.2% for white patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; P=.03). There was no difference between blacks and whites regarding 2-year freedom from distant metastasis, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Among the patients who had stage III through IVB disease, blacks and whites had similar outcomes. On multivariate analysis, race was not statistically significant for locoregional control, freedom from distant metastasis, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Despite these similar outcomes, black patients had worse socioeconomic factors and increased comorbidities but had similar treatment compliance compared with white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

With more adverse prognostic factors, black patients experienced oncologic outcomes similar to the outcomes of white patients after receiving radiotherapy for HNSCC. The current data suggest that centers that treat large percentages of minority patients who receive radiotherapy for HNSCCs may overcome existing health care disparities through improved treatment compliance.

Differences in disease presentation, treatment outcomes, and toxicities in African American patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed differences in disease presentation, outcomes, and toxicities between African American (AA) and White (W) men treated with definitive radiation therapy for their prostate cancer.

METHODS

Three thousand one hundred eighty cases of prostate cancer treated with various radiation modalities at a single institution were reviewed. The cohort consisted of 92% W patients and 8% AA patients. Clinical and pathologic characteristics at presentation, treatment outcomes, and related toxicities were analyzed between the 2 groups. The median follow-up was 6.6 years (0.6 to 22.4 y).

RESULTS

At presentation, AA men were younger (P<0.001) and more likely to have a Gleason score of ≥7 (47.9% vs. 39.2%, P=0.006). No difference in the 5 or 10-year rates of biochemical failure, disease-free survival, or distant metastases were noted. Although there was a trend for improved 10-year overall survival for AA men (65.3% vs. 57.4%, P=0.06), cause-specific survival was significantly improved at 10 years (98.6% vs. 90.6%, P=0.002). Similar findings were seen when controlling for radiation therapy dose, the use of hormonal therapy, and modality of radiation therapy used. Overall, genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicities were similar regardless of the modality used.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in presenting characteristics, AA men did not have inferior clinical outcomes but rather improved cause-specific survival when treated with standard of care radiation therapy. Regardless of the treatment modality used, toxicities between AA and W men were comparable.

[Radiotherapy with androgen deprivation in high-risk prostate cancer: what outcomes on a Caribbean population?]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze in a Caribbean population at 90% of African descent, the results of radiotherapy with androgen deprivation (AD) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with a high-risk PCa as defined by the D'AMICO classification and treated by radiotherapy with AD between January 2003 and April 2009 in our center were analyzed. The median dose of radiation and the median duration of AD were 70Gy and 37months respectively. Biochemical recurrence (BF), as primary outcome was defined according to the PHOENIX criteria (nadir PSA+2ng/mL). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of BF. The median follow-up was 47months.

RESULTS

Eight (13.6%) patients had BF and four (6.8%) developed metastases. Six (10.2%) died during the follow-up. The 5years acturial biochemical disease-free survival was 79.7%. Multivariate analyses have shown that Gleason sum (GS) superior to 7 (P=0.029), AD duration less than 24months (P=0.004) and the rate of Nadir PSA greater or equal to 0.5ng/mL (P=0.011) were independent predictive factors of BF.

CONCLUSION

This study was the first to our knowledge, to provide that radiotherapy associate with AD for HRPC among Caribbean men is effective as observed in other populations. Patients with GS superior to 7 could be considered for more aggressive treatments in clinical trials.

Systematic review of the effect of radiation dose on tumor control and morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer by 3D-CRT

PURPOSE

A higher radiation dose is believed to result in a larger probability of tumor control and a higher risk of side effects. To make an evidence-based choice of dose, the relation between dose and outcome needs to be known. This study focuses on the dose-response relation for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was carried out on the literature from 1990 to 2003. From the selected studies, the radiation dose, the associated 5-year survival, 5-year bNED (biochemical no evidence of disease), acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity Grade 2 or more, and sexual dysfunction were extracted. With logistic regression models, the relation between dose and outcome was described.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies met our criteria, describing 87 subgroups and involving up to 3000 patients per outcome measure. Between the (equivalent) dose of 70 and 80 Gy, various models estimated an increase in 5-year survival (ranging from 10% to 11%), 5-year bNED for low-risk patients (5-7%), late GI complications (12-16%), late GU complications (8-10%), and erectile dysfunction (19-24%). Only for the overall 5-year bNED, results were inconclusive (range, 0-18%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest a relationship between dose and outcome measures, including survival. However, the strength of these conclusions is limited by the sometimes small number of studies, the incompleteness of the data, and above all, the correlational nature of the data. Unambiguous proof for the dose-response relationships can, therefore, only be obtained by conducting randomized trials.

Analysis of impact of age and race on biochemical control after radiotherapy in different prostate cancer settings

OBJECTIVES

To provide a single-institution analysis of the impact of age and race on biochemical control after radiotherapy (RT) administered in different prostate cancer scenarios. Age and race are among the most controversial prognostic factors in determining outcome after RT. Proper understanding of these prognostic factors can assist in both treatment decision-making and the general understanding of the natural history of prostate cancer.

METHODS

The records of 527 consecutive nonmetastatic patients undergoing RT at a single institution and for whom demographic, disease, treatment, and follow-up information were available were reviewed. The cohort was divided into two categories: locally advanced/localized (458 patients) and postprostatectomy (69 patients). Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) curves were compared within each group to determine the influence of age and race on biochemical control.

RESULTS

BFFS curves for the entire study population did not reveal any statistically significant difference when separated by age (younger than 60 years versus 60 to 69 years versus 70 years or older; 4-year BFFS 75% versus 70% versus 72%, respectively; P = 0.773) or by race (African American versus white; 4-year BFFS 74% versus 70%, respectively; P = 0.469). Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed as a function of stage or age within either category (intact prostate or postprostatectomy).

CONCLUSIONS

Age and race did not, in our study, independently influence biochemical control after RT for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. On the basis of the results of this study, age and race should not be used as independent factors in treatment decision-making and in patient counseling concerning prostate cancer.

Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment outcomes: a systematic review

Although differences in prostate cancer incidence and mortality between black and white men are widely accepted, the existence of racial differences in treatment outcomes remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of racial differences in prostate cancer treatment outcomes. Systematic review of literature from 1992-2002 was conducted. Database searches were performed using the terms: "prostate cancer" (keyword) or "prostate neoplasm" (subject heading) + "blacks" (subject heading) or "blacks" (keyword) + "African-Americans" (subject heading or "African-Americans" (keyword). Two hundred fifty-eight relevant articles were identified; 29 fit the inclusion criteria. All but 3 were retrospective. Seven (24%) studies were conducted at Veterans Affairs medical centers. Treatment included radical prostatectomy (15 studies), hormonal therapy (5 studies), and radiotherapy (12 studies). Three studies included more than 1 treatment. Twenty-three (79%) studies, observed no significant difference in treatment outcomes between races. The remainder found worse outcomes among black men, including worse 5-year survival (HR range, 2.35-96.74) and higher rates of PSA failure (OR range, 1.15-1.69). Most studies investigating racial differences in prostate cancer treatment outcomes over the past 10 years found no difference between races after controlling for tumor and patient characteristics. Efforts to narrow the gap between black and white prostate cancer mortality should focus on ensuring that all patients receive optimal treatment and that all patients become informed about the use of screening for early cancer detection. Research should focus on interventions to reduce advanced presentation of the disease and disease-related mortality among black men.

Explaining racial differences in prostate cancer in the United States: sociology or biology?

Black men in the United States have the highest incidence and mortality from prostate cancer in the world. Even after adjusting for stage at diagnosis, black men have higher mortality rates than white men. Multiple reasons have been postulated to explain these findings including access to care, attitudes about care, socioeconomic and education differences, differences in type and aggressiveness of treatment, dietary, and genetic differences. While each reason may contribute to the higher incidence or higher mortality, likely combinations of reasons will best explain all the findings. Racial differences in socioeconomic status have been well established and we review the significance of these findings in relationship to prostate cancer. Also, with recent advances in the understanding of genetic variation in the human genome, in general, and in the genes involved in pathways relevant to prostate cancer biology, in particular, a number of genes with alleles which differ in frequency between black and white men have been proposed as a genetic cause or contributor to the increased prostate cancer risk in black men. However, the clinical significance of these genetic differences is not fully known. Finally, we conclude with some thoughts as to how to integrate the findings from sociological as well as biological studies and touch upon methods to reduce the disparate burden of prostate cancer among blacks in the United States.

Designing a Randomized Phase I/II Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention Trial Using 1??-Hydroxy-24-Ethyl-Cholecalciferol, an Analogue of Vitamin D3

Prostate cancer continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality among older men. One possible means of reducing its impact on overall health and vitality is via cancer chemoprevention, both in the population that is unaffected but at some risk and in those who have undergone some form of curative therapy after the onset of the disease. Chemoprevention holds significant promise, but large phase III clinical trials evaluating chemopreventive agents in prostate cancer can require vast numbers of enrollees and require the commitment of significant financial resources and time before any therapeutic benefit may become apparent. One technique to shorten the time required for chemoprevention clinical trials is to use surrogate endpoint biomarkers in place of the currently used actual endpoints of cancer incidence or survival. The validation of such surrogate endpoint biomarkers will require small, well-designed phase I and/or II trials to accumulate data on the modulation of the surrogate biomarkers and the endpoints of cancer incidence or survival by the chemopreventive agent. Careful statistical correlation and clinical validation of the data will then allow us to justify the use such surrogates in place of the actual endpoint in large, randomized trials, potentially shortening trial duration, improving financial efficiency, and accelerating approval of the chemopreventive agent. To that end, we first review the theoretical construct of cancer chemoprevention trials with particular reference to prostate cancer. We thereafter describe the design of a small, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase I/II clinical trial of an analogue of vitamin D, vitamin D5, which we believe could serve as a model for data accumulation on surrogate biomarkers and correlation with other clinical endpoints.

Comparison of clinical and pathological features in African-American and Caucasian patients with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient characteristics, prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, and established preoperative and pathological prognostic factors to determine differences between Caucasian and African-American patients with localised prostate cancer, as it remains controversial whether African-American men present with more aggressive disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (aged 53-76 years) undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at an equal-access tertiary-care centre were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had preoperative PSA levels, a physical examination (including clinical staging), and sextant biopsy. Insurance information was also collected. The same urological oncologist determined clinical staging and performed all the RRPs, and the same genitourinary pathologist determined the Gleason grade for biopsies and surgical specimens, pathological stage, percentage of tumour involvement, and specimen weight. African-American and Caucasian patients were compared for PSA, clinical stage, pathological stage, biopsy and pathological Gleason grade, organ confinement, margin status and specimen weight. Using preoperative and pathological data, both groups were also compared for over- and under-staging and -grading. The Wilcoxon rank test with P < 0.05 was used to determine statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

African-American patients were more likely to be Medicaid or self-insured than Caucasian patients. Age, biopsy grade and clinical stage were not significantly different between the groups. African-American patients presented with a mean PSA level of 11.9 ng/mL and Caucasians with a mean of 8.5 ng/mL (P = 0.03). When clinical and biopsy data were compared with pathological data there were no differences between the groups in under/over-grading or under/over-staging. African-American patients had larger prostates per surgical specimen than their Caucasian counterparts (59.3 g vs 51.6 g, respectively; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In a referred, equal-access system, African-American patients presented with higher serum PSA levels and had larger prostates in the surgical specimen. However, African-American patients did not present at an earlier age or with higher Gleason grade or clinical stage, nor were pathological grade and stages higher. Other pathological features were no different. African-American patients were not under- or over-staged or under- or over-graded more than their Caucasian counterparts. This retrospective study does not suggest that African-American men present with more aggressive disease.

Efficacy of brachytherapy for prostate cancer in African Americans compared with Caucasians

PURPOSE

To compare the biochemical response to prostate brachytherapy between African Americans and Caucasians in a consecutive series of patients treated at a single institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 1995 and October 2001, 173 patients were treated with permanent (125)I seed implantation alone for presumed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Twelve patients were African American and their biochemical response to treatment was compared with the 161 Caucasian patients. The patients were evaluated for biochemical recurrence according to the ASTRO consensus statement and for achieving and maintaining PSA nadirs of < or = 1.0, < or = 0.5, and < or = 0.2. Median pretreatment PSA level was 8 for the African American group and 6 for the Caucasian group. Median Gleason score for each group was 6 and no patients had palpable extraprostatic disease at the time of treatment.

RESULTS

None of the African American patients have experienced biochemical recurrence compared with 7.5% of the Caucasian patients (p=0.34). The percentage of African American patients achieving and maintaining a PSA level of < or = 1.0 was 83% compared with 89% for the Caucasian patients (p=0.61). PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 was achieved in 75% of the African American patients and 81% of the Caucasian patients (p=0.52) and 50% of the African American patients experienced PSA levels of < or = 0.2 compared with 59% of the Caucasian patients (p=0.88).

CONCLUSION

African American patients with prostate cancer have in general been reported to have worse prognosis compared with Caucasians. This series suggests similar outcome between African American and Caucasian patients treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Effect of race on biochemical disease-free outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy in an equal-access health care system: radiation oncology report of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research

PURPOSE

To report on the first collaboration of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research concerned with the relationship between African American race and biochemical disease-free outcomes after definitive radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information from the medical records of 1,806 patients (1,349 white, 343 African American, 42 of "other" races, and 72 of "unknown" races) treated with definitive radiation therapy between 1973 and 2000 was reviewed. Patients receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy or postoperative adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy were excluded. Biochemical failure was calculated in over 96% of cases by using ASTRO criteria; patients with fewer than three follow-up visits were considered to have biochemical failure with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value more than 10-fold the previous value or with any value greater than 50.0 ng/mL. Median radiation therapy doses were similar. The median follow-up was 58.4 months. Kaplan-Meier tests, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and log-rank tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival according to race when patients were stratified according to T stage. African American race conferred a negative prognosis for patients with lesions of Gleason biopsy score 7 (P =.004) but not for patients with lesions of Gleason score 2-4 (P =.14), 5-6 (P =.79), or 8-10 (P =.86). Similarly, African American race conferred a negative prognosis in patients with PSA values of 20.1-50.0 ng/mL (P =.01) at presentation but not in patients with PSA values less than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL (P =.84), 4.1-10.0 ng/mL (P =.71), 10.1-20.0 ng/mL (P =.75), or above 50.0 ng/mL (P =.15) at presentation. At multivariate analysis, race was not a statistically significant predictor of outcome.

CONCLUSION

In the equal-access health care system of the Department of Defense, African American race is not associated with a consistently negative prognosis in patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Race appears to confer a negative prognosis only in patients with advanced disease at presentation.

Impact of race on prostate-specific antigen outcome after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer in African-American and white men using previously established risk groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 2000, 2,036 men (n = 162 African-American men, n = 1,874 white men) underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. Using pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage, and percentage of positive biopsy specimens, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups. For each risk group, PSA outcome was estimated using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of PSA outcome between African-American and white men were made using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median age and PSA level for African-American and white men were 60 and 62 years old and 8.8 and 7.0 ng/mL, respectively. African-Americans had a statistically significant increase in PSA (P =.002), Gleason score (P =.003), clinical T stage (P =.004), and percentage of positive biopsy specimens (P =.04) at presentation. However, there was no statistical difference in the distribution of PSA, clinical T stage, or Gleason score between racial groups in the low- and high-risk groups. The 5-year estimate of PSA outcome was 87% in the low-risk group for all patients (P =.70) and 28% versus 32% in African-American and white patients in the high-risk group (P =.28), respectively. Longer follow-up is required to confirm if these results are maintained at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Even though African-American men presented at a younger age and with more advanced disease compared with white men with prostate cancer, PSA outcome after RP when controlled for known clinical predictive factors was not statistically different. This study supports earlier screening in African-American men.

Prognostic significance of race on biochemical control in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with permanent brachytherapy: multivariate and matched-pair analyses

PURPOSE

To compare PSA relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) between African-American (AA) and white American (WA) males treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One thousand eighty-one consecutive patients, including 246 African-Americans, underwent PPB with 103Pd or 125I, alone or with external beam radiation therapy between September 1992 and September 1999. Computer-generated matching was performed to create two identical cohorts of WA and AA males, based on the use of neoadjuvant androgen ablation (NAAD), pretreatment PSA, and Gleason score. Presenting characteristics were used to define risk groups, as follows: Low risk had PSA <or=10 and Gleason score <or=6, intermediate risk had PSA >10 or Gleason score >or=7, and high risk had PSA >10 and Gleason score >or=7. PSA-RFS was calculated using the Kattan modification of the ASTRO definition, and the log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier PSA-RFS curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of PSA-RFS.

RESULTS

Overall, univariate analysis revealed that AA males at presentation had lower disease stage (p = 0.01), had lower Gleason scores (p = 0.017), were younger (p = 0.001), and were more likely to receive NAAD (p = 0.001) than their WA counterparts. There were no differences in pretreatment PSA, isotope selection, use of external beam radiation therapy, median follow-up, or risk group classification between AA and WA males. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were significant predictors of PSA-RFS in multivariate analysis, and race was not significant. There was no significant difference between the 5-year PSA-RFS for AA males (84.0%) and the matched cohort of WA males (81.2%) (p = 0.384). Race was not a predictor of 5-year PSA-RFS among patients treated with or without NAAD and within low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

Race is not an independent predictor of 5-year PSA-RFS in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with PPB. This result is consistent with other studies that also show that race does not contribute to differences in outcome after definitive therapies for localized prostate cancer.

Independent prognostic significance of HER-2 oncoprotein expression in pN0 prostate cancer undergoing curative radiotherapy

Existing prognostic algorithms for localized prostate cancer (PC) are hampered by poor validation for endpoints other than biochemical relapse such as clinical disease progression or survival. Therefore, the prognostic relevance of Her-2 (Her-2/neu, c-erbB2) protein expression in patients undergoing curative radiotherapy (RT) was compared to widely accepted prognostic factors such as pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, biopsy Gleason score and T category of the primary tumor. Biopsies from 112 homogeneously treated patients with T1-4pN0M0 PC were examined by immunohistochemistry and 37% of cases showed membrane-bound Her-2 expression in more than 10% of cancer cells. No definite membrane staining was seen in normal prostate epithelium. With 25 patients dead of PC and a median follow-up of surviving patients of 71 months (range 48-144), the prognostic relevance of Her-2 expression was univariately associated with adverse outcome in terms of biochemical or clinical progression-free survival (B/C-PFS; p = 0.04), clinical progression-free survival (C-PFS; p = 0.02) and disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, Her-2 expression, T category and Gleason score were independently associated with C-PFS, whereas only Her-2 expression and Gleason score were associated with DSS. Her-2 expression and Gleason score together discriminated 2 groups of patients with 5-year DSS of 95% and 79%, respectively (p < 0.001). Pretreatment PSA levels were associated only with B/C-PFS but not with C-PFS or DSS. Together the data show for the first time that expression of Her-2 is of prognostic relevance in localized PC undergoing RT and suggest that analysis for Her-2 may improve prognostic algorithms for clinically relevant endpoints other than biochemical relapse.

Clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy in black and white men

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer in black men is 50% to 70% higher than among age-matched white men. Black men have a twofold higher mortality rate and overall tend to have higher serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels than white men. To determine whether racial differences exist in men whose prostate cancer was diagnosed based solely on an elevated serum PSA level, we compared clinical and pathologic features in black and white men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinical stage T1c prostate cancer.

METHODS

We used a prospectively collected database to identify all men undergoing RP for clinical T1c prostate cancer between July 1995 and October 2000. A total of 129 consecutive men (56 black men and 73 white men) were compared for age at diagnosis, serum PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, RP specimen Gleason score, incidence of lymph node metastasis, and incidence of positive surgical margins.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were not found by race in patients' ages, serum PSA levels, biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, incidence of lymph node metastases, or incidence of positive surgical margins. The RP specimen Gleason score was more heterogeneous in black men than white men (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial differences in the incidence and mortality rate of prostate cancer are well known, but differences in the clinical and pathologic features between black and white men with prostate cancer identified solely based on an elevated serum PSA level with negative results on digital rectal examination (clinical stage T1c ) have been poorly studied. Our results suggest that men with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer have similar clinical and pathologic findings regardless of race. These results suggest that early-detection programs using serum PSA testing for prostate cancer in black men potentially can result in improvements in prostate cancer outcomes in this high-risk group.