Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy versus isolated upper abdominal perfusion for advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study on 454 patients

Purpose

The treatment of pancreatic carcinoma remains a challenge as prognosis is poor, even if confined to a single anatomical region. A regional treatment of pancreatic cancer with high drug concentrations at the tumor site may increase response behaviour. Intra-arterial administration of drugs generates homogenous drug distribution throughout the entire tumor volume.

Methods

We report on treatment outcome of 454 patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (WHO stage III: 174 patients, WHO stage IV: 280 patients). Patients have been separated to two different treatment protocols. The first group (n = 233 patients) has been treated via angiographically placed celiac axis catheters. The second group (n = 221 patients) had upper abdominal perfusion (UAP) with stopflow balloon catheters in aorta and vena cava. Both groups have been treated with a combination of cisplatin, adriamycin and mitomycin.

Results

For stage III pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 8 and 12 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. For stage IV pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 7 and 8.5 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. Resolution of ascites has been reached in all cases by UAP treatment. Toxicity was generally mild, WHO grade I or II, toxicity grade III or IV was only noted in patients with severe systemic pretreatment. The techniques, survival data and detailed results are demonstrated.

Conclusions

Responsiveness of pancreatic cancer to regional chemotherapy is drug exposure dependent. The isolated perfusion procedure is superior to intra-arterial infusion in survival times.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03019-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Phase II Study of Biweekly Cisplatin, Fixed-Dose-Rate Gemcitabine and Infusional 5-Fluorouracil in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic and Biliary Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Combinations of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and platinum have demonstrated improved outcomes compared with singlet chemotherapy in pancreatic and biliary cancers. This phase II study examined efficacy and safety of a novel schedule of cisplatin, fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or biliary tract, previously untreated or having received 1 cytotoxic regimen for advanced disease, were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m intravenously (IV) over 100 minutes, cisplatin 35 mg/m IV over 30 minutes, and 5-FU 2400 mg/m IV over 48 hours on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Patients were treated until disease progression or for 12 cycles. After 12 cycles, patients with stable or responding disease could continue gemcitabine and 5-FU. The primary endpoint was objective response.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were treated: 8 with biliary cancer (all untreated) and 31 with pancreatic cancer (17 untreated, 14 previously treated). Best response in 25 untreated patients was partial response in 40%, stable disease in 40%, and progressive disease in 20%. In 14 previously treated pancreatic patients, best response was partial response in 7%, stable disease in 50%, and progressive disease in 43%. Median overall survival in untreated patients was 10.3 versus 4.9 months in previously treated patients. Adverse events were primarily uncomplicated hematologic toxicity, ≥grade 3 neutropenia (54%), anemia (21%), and thrombocytopenia (13%).

CONCLUSION

Biweekly cisplatin, fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine, and infusional 5-FU demonstrated a high response rate and were well tolerated, encouraging further investigation of this regimen in metastatic pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Triplet cytotoxic chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer

In advanced or relapsed pancreatic cancer, mono- or duo-therapy has shown modest efficacy at best. The present study evaluated the efficacy of a triplet combination in relapsed or advanced pancreatic cancer. A total of 37 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in stage III/IV or with relapsed disease were treated with a gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (GFP) regimen every 3 weeks. Only 29 out of 37 patients were evaluable for response due to early treatment interruption in 8 patients. The overall response rate was 24.1% and the disease control rate was 68.9%. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 61.5, 30.9 and 17.6% at 3, 6 and 9 months, respectively, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 46.5 and 30.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18.4, 29.9 and 24.5% of 147 cycles, respectively. Old age and a poor performance status (PS) were associated with the early discontinuation of chemotherapy (P=0.038 and P=0.036, respectively). In patients <65 years old and with a PS of <2, the median PFS and OS times were 5.3 months and 10.3 months, respectively. Overall, although GFP resulted in acceptable response and survival rates, it does not appear to have marked superiority to gemcitabine-based single or duplet chemotherapy.

Emerging role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

The management of pancreatic cancer continues to be challenging. Despite surgical, genetic and molecular advances, its overall prognosis remains poor. Surgical resection is the only modality that offers a chance for a cure, with an overall survival rate of 10-20% at 5 years. However, only 20% of the patients are surgical candidates because of locally advanced disease or systemic stage at presentation. Conventional radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, has been used to treat patients with advanced-stage pancreatic cancer, an approach with high rates of local recurrence. Stereotactic body radiation therapy, also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy has emerged as a treatment modality that allows the precise delivery of a large ablative radiation dose to a tumor volume while sparing surrounding organs and tissues. Phase I and II studies have shown good rates of local control of the disease but rates of distant metastasis remain significant. Strategies to combine novel systemic therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy are to be explored.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of 6 prospective trials

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is a widely used biomarker in pancreatic cancer. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the change in CA19-9 serum levels and its role in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Individual patient data from 6 prospective trials evaluating gemcitabine-containing regimens from 3 different institutions were pooled. CA19-9 values were obtained at baseline and after successive cycles of treatment. The objective of this study was to correlate a decline in CA19-9 with outcomes while undergoing treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients with locally advanced (n = 50) or metastatic (n = 162) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included. Median baseline CA19-9 level was 1077 ng/mL (range, 15-492,241 ng/mL). Groups were divided into those levels below (low) or above (high) the median. Median overall survival (mOS) was 8.7 versus 5.2 months (P = .0018) and median time to progression (mTTP) was 5.8 versus 3.7 months (P = .082) in the low versus high groups, respectively. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, up to a 5% increase versus ≥ 5% increase in CA19-9 levels conferred an improved mOS (10.3 vs 5.1 months, P = .0022) and mTTP (7.5 vs 3.5 months, P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who have advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine-containing regimens baseline CA19-9 is prognostic for outcome. A decline in CA19-9 after the second cycle of chemotherapy is not predictive of improved mOS or mTTP; thus, CA19-9 decline is not a useful surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Clinically, a ≥ 5% rise in CA19-9 after 2 cycles of chemotherapy serves as a negative predictive marker.

The GOFURTGO Study: AGITG phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine-oxaliplatin integrated with concomitant 5FU and 3-D conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of localised pancreatic cancer

Background:

Locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a poor prognosis. By increasing intensity of systemic therapy combined with an established safe chemoradiation technique, our intention was to enhance the outcomes of LAPC. In preparation for phase III evaluation, the feasibility and efficacy of our candidate regimen gemcitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy with sandwich 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) needs to be established.

Methods:

A total of 48 patients with inoperable LAPC without metastases were given gemcitabine (1000 mg m⁻² d1 + d15 q28) and oxaliplatin (100 mg m⁻² d2 + d16 q28) in induction (one cycle) and consolidation (three cycles), and 5FU 200 mg m⁻² per day over 6 weeks during 3DCRT 54 Gy.

Results:

Median duration of sustained local control (LC) was 15.8 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months, and overall survival was 15.7 months. Survival rates for 1, 2, and 3 years were 70.2%, 21.3%, and 12.8%, respectively. Global quality of life did not significantly decline from baseline during treatment, which was associated with modest treatment-related toxicity.

Conclusion:

Fixed-dose gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, combined with an effective and safe regimen of 5FU and 3DCRT radiotherapy, was feasible and reasonably tolerated. The observed improved duration of LC and PFS with more intensive therapy over previous trials may be due to patient selection, but suggest that further evaluation in phase III trials is warranted.

Regional hyperthermia combined with chemoradiotherapy in primary or recurrent locally advanced pancreatic cancer : an open-label comparative cohort trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of delivering regional hyperthermia (HT) plus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients suffering from locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2008, 68 patients affected by primary (56/68) or recurrent (12/68) LAPC were treated either with CRT alone or CRT plus HT. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of 3D conformal irradiation of tumor and regional lymph nodes (dose ranged from 30 Gy/10 fractions to 66 Gy/33 fractions). Chemotherapy (CT) consisted of gemcitabine (GEM) alone or in association with either oxaliplatin, cisplatin, or 5-FU. HT was delivered twice a week, concomitant with RT.

RESULTS

In the current study, 60 of the original 68 patients were included. Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months in the HT group versus 11 months in the control group (log-rank test: p = 0.025). HT did not increase CRT toxicity.

CONCLUSION

HT can be added safely to CRT in LAPC, thus, resulting in slightly prolonged survival in certain cases.

Imaging evaluation of therapeutic response in patients with pancreatic cancer: recent advances

Chemoradiotherapy is the primary choice of non-surgical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and diagnostic imaging plays an important role in objectively assessing early therapeutic response. This article systematically reviews the criteria for evaluation of therapeutic response in solid tumors and their application in pancreatic cancer, highlighting some key contents in imaging evaluation of therapeutic response in patients with pancreatic cancer.

CA19-9 as a predictor of tumor response and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine based chemotherapy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive role of pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) measurement and its change after one cycle of gemcitabine-based therapy for response, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Analyses were derived from three consecutive gemcitabine-containing phase II clinical trials between 1997 and 2004.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients with pancreas cancer was studied. Baseline CA19-9 concentrations were dichotomized near the median. Lower baseline CA19-9 levels were positively associated with OS (median 9.1 vs 6.1 months, P = 0.0057) and TTP (median 6.4 vs 4.2 months, P = 0.0044).The covariate adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for progression among patients with baseline CA19-9 >or= 1000 ng/mL was HR = 1.94 (95% CI 1.24-3.02), with P = 0.0035. The covariate adjusted risk of death among patients with baseline CA19-9 >or= 1000 ng/ml was similarly elevated: HR = 1.90 (95% CI 1.23-2.94), with P = 0.0039. Change in CA19-9 levels from baseline to the end of treatment cycle 1 did not predict objective response (P = 0.75). There was somewhat longer OS (median 8.7 vs 7.1 months) and TTP (median 7.1 vs 5.4 months) in patients with >or=50% reduction in serum CA19-9 concentrations, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.74 and 0.81, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Baseline CA19-9 levels may predict survival in patients with advanced pancreas cancer. The change in CA19-9 levels determined within 1 month of the initiation of therapy did not predict treatment outcome.

Impact of race, age, and socioeconomic status on participation in pancreatic cancer clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

Over 18 years, 7 phase 2 trials in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) were conducted at Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI). We sought factors that influenced the selection of patients for clinical trials and explored differences in overall survival (OS) of patients treated on clinical trials versus standard of care.

METHODS

The target population was patients with APC diagnosed between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 2003. Patients were divided into 3 mutually exclusive groups: treated on clinical trials at KCI (t-KCI), treated at KCI but not on a clinical trial (KCI), or treated at non-KCI institutions (n-KCI).

RESULTS

Eight thousand two hundred thirty patients met study criteria: 6470 n-KCI, 1642 KCI, and 118 t-KCI. Significant differences were observed across the 3 groups with respect to age, race, stage, grade, and socioeconomic status. Median OS was higher in t-KCI (8.5 months) than in KCI (5.0 months) or n-KCI (2.8 months) and could not be accounted for by variations in baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients enrolled on clinical trials were younger, had better socioeconomic status, and were less often African American. Patients with APC treated at academic institutions may have longer OS than patients treated in the community. Clinical trials seem to offer a survival advantage for patients with APC.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy and gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer have a dismal prognosis. Conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy requires 6 weeks of daily treatment and can be arduous. We explored the safety and effectiveness of a 3-day course of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) followed by gemcitabine in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 36 patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer with ≥12 months of follow-up were included. They received three fractions of 8, 10, or 12 Gy (total dose, 24-36 Gy) of SBRT according to the tumor location in relation to the stomach and duodenum, using fiducial-based respiratory motion tracking on a robotic radiosurgery system. The patients were then offered gemcitabine for 6 months or until tolerance or disease progression.

RESULTS

With an overall median follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-33), the local control rate was 78%, the median overall survival time was 14.3 months, the median carbohydrate antigen 19-9-determined progression-free survival time was 7.9 months, and the median computed tomography-determined progression-free survival time was 9.6 months. Of the 36 patients, 28 (78%) eventually developed distant metastases. Six patients (17%) were free of progression at the last follow-up visit (range, 13-30 months) as determined by normalized tumor markers with stable computed tomography findings. Nine Grade 2 (25%) and five Grade 3 (14%) toxicities attributable to SBRT occurred.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated SBRT can be delivered quickly and effectively in patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer with acceptable side effects and minimal interference with gemcitabine chemotherapy.

MDM2 inhibitor MI-319 in combination with cisplatin is an effective treatment for pancreatic cancer independent of p53 function

Small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) are known to restore the apoptotic and cell cycle regulatory functions of p53 by disrupting the MDM2-p53 interaction. In principle, these SMIs are not effective against tumours with mutation in the tumour suppressor p53 (mut-p53), which is known to be present in approximately 50% of all cancers. In this study we are reporting, for the first time, that MI-319 in combination with cisplatin induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer (PC) cells irrespective of their p53 mutational status. MI-319-cisplatin combination synergistically suppressed cell growth (MTT Combination Index [CI]<1) and colony formation (clonogenic assay) and induced apoptosis. Western blot analysis and siRNA silencing studies in mutant as well as p53 null cells highlighted a mechanism involving p73 which is also known to be under the regulation of MDM2, and unlike p53, it is rarely mutated in PC. Down-regulating MDM2 using siRNA enhanced p73 reactivation and increased cell death. Further, the combination effectively reduced tumour growth in both wt-p53 and mut-p53 tumour xenograft models (50% Capan-2 animals were tumour free). Consistent with our in vitro results, remnant tumour tissue analysis showed up-regulation of p73 and the cell cycle regulator p21. In conclusion, this study highlights a new role of MDM2 inhibitors in combination with cisplatin, and thus warrants further clinical investigation in human pancreatic tumours containing both wt-p53 and mut-p53.

Rationale and design of PROSPECT-CONKO 004: a prospective, randomized trial of simultaneous pancreatic cancer treatment with enoxaparin and chemotherapy)

Background

Advanced pancreatic cancer, in addition to its high mortality, is characterized by one of the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) as compared to other types of cancer. Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), has proven to be effective for the prevention and treatment of VTE in surgical and general medical patients. Results of some small studies suggest that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer, however, enoxaparin is not currently indicated for this use. This phase IIb study was designed to analyze the efficacy of enoxaparin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

The aim of this prospective multicenter trial is to compare concomitant treatment with enoxaparin to no anticoagulation in 540 patients. Primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant VTE (symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the leg and/or pelvic and/or pulmonary embolism (PE)) within the first 3 months. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE after 6, 9 and 12 months as well as remission at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, overall survival and bleeding. Trial registration: isrctn.org identifier CCT-NAPN-16752, controlled-trials.com identifier: ISRCTN02140505.

Results

An interim analysis for safety performed after inclusion of 152 patients revealed no increased risk of bleeding (5 pts vs. 6 pts, Chi²: 0.763).

Conclusion

PROSPECT is a pivotal study in elucidating the role of low molecular weight heparins in advanced pancreatic cancer. Its results will lead to a new understanding of the role of heparins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and of their effect on survival, remission rates and toxicity of chemotherapeutic regimens.

A pilot study on combination of cryosurgery and 125iodine seed implantation for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

AIM: To study the therapeutic value of combination of cryosurgery and ¹²⁵iodine seed implantation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Forty-nine patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (males 36, females 13), with a median age of 59 years, were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients had liver metastases. In all cases the tumors were considered unresectable after a comprehensive evaluation. Patients were treated with cryosurgery, which was performed intraoperatively or percutaneously under guidance of ultrasound and/or computed tomography (CT), and ¹²⁵iodine seed implantation, which was performed during cryosurgery or post-cryosurgery under guidance of ultrasound and/or CT. A few patients received regional celiac artery chemotherapy.

RESULTS: Thirteen patients received intraoperative cryosurgery and 36 received percutaneous cryosurgery. Some patients underwent repeat cryosurgery. ¹²⁵Iodine seed implantation was performed during freezing procedure in 35 patients and 3-9 d after cryosurgery in 14 cases. Twenty patients, 10 of whom had hepatic metastases received regional chemotherapy. At 3 mo after therapy, CT was repeated to estimate tumor response to therapy. Most patients showed varying degrees of tumor necrosis. Complete response (CR) of tumor was seen in 20.4% patients, partial response (PR), in 38.8%, stable disease (SD), in 30.6%, and progressive disease (PD), in 10.2%. Adverse effects associated with cryosurgery included upper abdomen pain and increased serum amylase. Acute pancreatitis was seen in 6 patients one of whom developed severe pancreatitis. All adverse effects were controlled by medical management with no poor outcome. There was no therapy-related mortality. During a median follow-up of 18 mo (range of 5-40), the median survival was 16.2 mo, with 26 patients (53.1%) surviving for 12 mo or more. Overall, the 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-mo survival rates were 94.9%, 63.1%, 22.8% and 9.5%, respectively. Eight patients had survival of 24 mo or more. The patient with the longest survival (40 mo) is still living without evidence of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION: Cryosurgery, which is far less invasive than conventional pancreatic resection, and is associated with a low rate of adverse effects, should be the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. ¹²⁵Iodine seed implantation can destroy the residual surviving cancer cells after cryosurgery. Hence, a combination of both modalities has a complementary effect.

Cryosurgery with combination of (125)iodine seed implantation for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To study the therapeutic value of cryosurgery with combination of (125)iodine seed implantation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathology in 31 patients. Ten patients had metastases of the peripancreatic lymph node and eight had liver metastases. The therapy included cryosurgery, which was performed intra-operatively or percutaneously under guidance of ultrasound and/or computed tomography (CT), and (125)iodine seed implantation, which was performed during cryosurgery process or post-cryosurgery under the guidance of ultrasound and/or CT.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received intra-operative cryosurgery and 27 received percutaneous cryosurgery. Fourteen patients underwent two procedures of cryosurgery and three underwent three procedures of cryosurgery. (125)Iodine seed implantation was performed during the freezing procedure in 29 patients and within 3-7 days after cryosurgery in nine patients under ultrasound and CT guidance. Fifteen patients, of whom 13 had metastases of peripancreatic lymph nodes or liver received regional chemotherapy. At 3 months after therapy, a CT follow-up was performed to estimate the tumor response to therapy. Most of the patients had varying degrees of tumor necrosis. A complete response of the tumor was seen in 23.6% of patients, a partial response in 42.1%, stable disease in 26.3% and progressive disease in 7.9%. The adverse effects associated with cryosurgery mainly included pain of the upper abdomen and increased serum amylase activity. Acute pancreatitis was seen in five patients, one of whom presented a severe type of pancreatitis. During the followed-up of a median of 16 months (range of 5-37) median overall survival was 12 months, 19 patients (50.0%) survived for 12 months or longer and four survived for 24 months or longer.

CONCLUSION

As it is far less invasive than conventional pancreas resection and entails a low rate of adverse effects, cryosurgery should be the choice modality for most patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. (125)Iodine seed implantation can destroy residue survival cancer cells after cryosurgery. Hence, combination of both modalities has a complementary effect.

The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

We developed a laboratory based regimen called GTX which induces synergistic apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. This retrospective review summarizes our clinical experience with GTX in an initial group of 35 patients; 66% untreated and 34% failed prior therapies.

METHODS

All patients treated with GTX for metastatic pancreatic cancer, prior to initiation of a prospective phase II trial of GTX were assessed and followed until death. GTX consisted of capecitabine (X), 750 mg/m(2) p.o. BID on days 1-14, gemcitabine (G) (750 mg/m(2)) over 75 min and docetaxel (T) (30 mg/m(2)) on days 4 and 11. Thus one cycle of GTX was 14 days with 7 days off for a 21 day cycle. Tumor assessments were repeated every 3 cycles.

RESULTS

All 35 patients had metastatic pancreatic cancer (94% liver, 6% lung sites). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were: leukopenia and thrombocytopenia-both 14%, and anemia 9%, respectively. The overall response rate of all 35 patients treated with GTX (from 0.5 cycles onward) was 29% (CR/PR) by WHO criteria, and 31% had a minor response or stable disease (MR, SD). At the metastatic sites for the 35 patients, there were 9% complete (CR) and 31% partial (PR) responses (total 40%). For the 31 patients who had their primary tumor (4 patients had a prior Whipple resection), there were 13% CR and 19% PR for a response rate of 32% at the primary tumor site. Overall median progression free survival of responders was 6.3 months (95% C.I. 4.4-10.4 months) and median survival was 11.2 months (95% C.I. 8.1-15.1 months). Survival after initiation of GTX at 12, 18, 24 and 30 months was 43, 29, 20, and 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective review suggests that GTX has potential as a regimen for untreated and treated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies

PURPOSE

The management of locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer patients remains controversial. To select patients who could benefit from chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the therapeutic strategy used by the Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) consisted of initial chemotherapy (CT) for at least 3 months. The decision to administer CRT or continue CT in nonprogressive patients was the investigator's choice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of outcome in 181 patients with LA pancreatic cancer (76 women and 105 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 37 to 85 years) enrolled onto prospective phase II and III GERCOR studies was performed to compare the survival of patients who received CRT with that of patients who continued CT alone.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times for the 181 patients were 6.3 and 11.4 months, respectively. Fifty-three patients (29.3%) had metastatic disease after 3 months of CT and were not eligible for CRT. Among the 128 remaining patients (70.3%) who had no disease progression and who were, therefore, eligible for CRT, 72 (56%) received CRT (group A), whereas 56 (44%) continued with CT (group B). The two groups were balanced for initial characteristics (performance status, sex, age, and type of CT), as well as for induction CT results. In groups A and B, the median PFS times were 10.8 and 7.4 months, respectively (P = .005), and the median OS times were 15.0 and 11.7 months, respectively (P = .0009).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, after control of disease by initial CT, CRT could significantly improve survival in patients with LA pancreatic cancer compared with CT alone. A prospective phase III study is ongoing to evaluate this strategy.

Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and weekly high-dose 5-FU as 24-h infusion in chemonaive patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

BACKGROUND

Combinations of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, gemcitabine-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-FU-oxaliplatin have synergistic activity and nonoverlapping adverse effect profiles. This trial assessed efficacy and safety of the triple combination gemcitabine-oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU in patients with locally advanced (n=11) or metastatic (n=32) pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 43 eligible patients were treated with intravenous infusions of gemcitabine (900 mg/m2 over 30 min), followed by oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2 over 2 h) and 5-FU (1500 mg/m2 over 24 h) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Among all 43 patients, the tumor response rate was 19% [95% confidence interval 7% to 30%]. Nine patients were nonassessable for response because they did not complete the first two cycles of chemotherapy due to rapid disease progression, early death or treatment refusal. One patient was lost to follow-up. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.7 and 7.5 months. Principal grade III/IV toxic effects were leucopenia in 11 (2%), thrombocytopenia in 13 (2%), nausea in 13 (0%), anorexia 16 (7%) and sensory neuropathy in 18 (0%) of patients. Unexpected cardiotoxicity was observed in this trial.

CONCLUSION

Response rates and survival of the three-drug combination compare favorably with single-agent gemcitabine, but do not exceed results for doublets.

Dose-intense PEFG (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

PEFG regimen (cisplatin and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil (FU) 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion) significantly improved the outcome of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) with respect to standard gemcitabine in a previous phase III trial. This regimen was subsequently modified in a dose-finding study by increasing dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin (both at 30 mg/m2 every 14 days) and of gemcitabine (at 800 mg/m2 every 14 days). Results of a consecutive series treated by dose-intense PEFG regimen are herewith reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Dose-intense PEFG was administered to chemotherapy-naive patients with stages III-IV PA, < 75 years, performance status (PS) > 50, till progressive disease or for a maximum of 6 months.

RESULTS

Between January 2004 and June 2005, 49 (31 or 63% metastatic) patients, median age 62 years, median PS 80, were treated with dose-intense PEFG. Partial response and stable disease was observed in 24 (49%) and 16 (33%) patients, respectively; 31 patients were progression-free at 6 months (PFS-6 = 63%). Median survival was 10.5 months and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% confidence interval: 33-61%). Main grade 3-4 toxicity was: neutropenia in 26% of patients, stomatitis and fatigue in 8%, anaemia, diarrhoea, nausea/vomit in 6%, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopaenia in 4%, hand-foot syndrome in 2%.

CONCLUSION

When compared with 84 patients treated by classical PEFG at the same institution, dose-intense PEFG was not inferior in terms of PFS-6 (63 versus 57%), 1-year OS (48 versus 42%) and response rate (49 versus 49%); it allowed to increase dose intensity for gemcitabine by 32%, for cisplatin and epirubicin by 36% (FU reduced by 3%), to significantly reduce grade 3-4 hematological toxicity (neutropenia: 26 versus 86%; P < 0.00001; thrombocytopaenia: 4 versus 58%; P < 0.00001) and to reduce by one-third the number of outpatient accesses. The new PEFG schedule appears more suitable for clinical use and should be preferred as a basis for further development of therapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer.

Cisplatin-induced antitumor activity is potentiated by the soy isoflavone genistein in BxPC-3 pancreatic tumor xenografts

BACKGROUND

The activation of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) contributes to drug resistance in pancreatic carcinoma. The authors previously showed that the soy isoflavone genistein down-regulates the activation of NF-kappaB in many carcinoma cell lines in vitro. In the current study, they focused their investigation on testing whether the inactivation of NF-kappaB by genistein could enhance cisplatin-induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in BxPC-3 cells in vitro and antitumor activity of cisplatin in vivo.

METHODS

BxPC-3 cells were preexposed to 25 microM genistein for 24 hours and then exposed to cisplatin (0.5 microM) for an additional 72 hours. A cell growth inhibition assay, an apoptosis assay, and an NF-kappaB electrophoretic mobility shift assay were conducted. For the in vivo study, a xenograft model of BxPC-3 cells in severe combined immunodeficient mice was used. Genistein was given at a dose of 800 microg/kg orally for 5 days, cisplatin was given at a dose of 9 mg/kg as an intraperitoneal bolus, and another group of mice received both cisplatin and genistein (given on Day 1 concurrently followed by genistein for 4 days).

RESULTS

The combination of 25 microM genistein with 0.5 microM cisplatin resulted in significantly greater growth inhibition (P < 0.01) and more apoptosis in BxPC-3 cells compared with either agent alone. Preexposure of BxPC-3 cells to genistein abrogated cisplatin-induced activation of NF-kappaB, which appeared to be consistent with the authors' hypothesis. The authors also demonstrated for the first time that the in vivo effect of genistein enhanced the antitumor activity of cisplatin. The tumor weight for the control, genistein, cisplatin, and combined genistein and cisplatin mice was 940 mg, 762 mg, 261 mg, and 108 mg, respectively. Most important, for the first time, the authors observed that the DNA-binding activity of NF-kappaB was inactivated in genistein-treated animal tumors, whereas cisplatin significantly induced NF-kappaB DNA binding activity, and this was completely abrogated in genistein-pretreated tumors that were exposed to cisplatin, consistent with the in vitro data.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the current results were consistent with the authors' hypothesis and suggested that pretreatment of pancreatic carcinoma cells with genistein down-regulates NF-kappaB activity and contributes toward enhancing the apoptosis-inducing effect of cisplatin, leading to greater antitumor activity in vivo.

Fixed dose-rate infusion of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin and UFT in advanced carcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine is currently considered the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Cisplatin and a fluoropyrimidine have some activity in the treatment of this cancer. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a fixed dose-rate infusion of gemcitabine associated with cisplatin and UFT in patients with APC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six chemotherapy-naïve patients with APC that was either unresectable or metastatic were included in this phase II study. All of them had Karnofsky performance status > or =50 and unidimensionally measurable disease. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 given as a 120-min infusion weekly for three consecutive weeks, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral UFT 400 mg/m2/day (in two to three daily doses) on days 1 to 21; cycles of treatment were given every 28 days.

RESULTS

A total of 208 cycles of chemotherapy were given with a median of 4 per patient. Fourteen patients (30%) achieved partial responses (95% CI 19-48%) and 17 (37%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5 months, and the median overall survival 9 months. Nineteen patients (49%; 95% CI 32-64%) had a clinical benefit response. Grade 3-4 WHO toxicities were as follows: neutropaenia in 26 patients (57%), with 5 cases of febrile neutropaenia (11%), thrombocytopaenia in 15 (33%), anaemia in six (13%), diarrhoea in 5 (11%), asthenia in 2 (4%) and mucositis in 1 (2%). Seven patients required hospitalisation for treatment-related complications.

CONCLUSION

A fixed dose-rate infusion of gemcitabine associated with cisplatin and UFT is active in patients with APC, though at the cost of considerable toxicity.

A phase II study of weekly cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: is this a strategy still worth pursuing?

OBJECTIVES

A phase 2 study to assess the activity of the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced/metastatic/relapsed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas received cisplatin 25 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiologic response was assessed after 3 cycles, and treatment continued for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled, 35 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Hematological toxicity was significant but mostly asymptomatic with grade 3 to 4 (% of patients): leucopenia, 40%; neutropenia, 60%; thrombocytopenia, 60%. There were only 3 episodes of neutropenic sepsis and 2 significant bleeding episodes. Grade 3 to 4 nonhematological toxicities were uncommon but included constipation, infection without neutropenia, lethargy, and thromboembolic events. Of 32 evaluable patients, 62.8% achieved stable disease (SD) or better (SD, 53.4%; partial response, 9.4%). Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for clinical benefit response: 11 (31%) were clinical benefit responders, whereas 13 (36%) remained stable. With complete follow-up, the median time to disease progression was 5.75 months; median survival was 9.5 months, 6-month survival was 72.2%, and 1-year survival was 41.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is clearly an active regimen and may improve survival based on our 1-year and median survival findings and results from other institutions. However, only an adequately powered randomized controlled trial will assess any real survival benefit over single agent gemcitabine.

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer as most patients present with advanced disease, which precludes locoregional treatment. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. Gemcitabine is the only agent that improves symptoms and confers a modest survival advantage. Many combination therapy regimens have been studied in phase II settings. Eleven randomised phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine-containing regimens with gemcitabine monotherapy since gemcitabine became available clinically. The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage over gemcitabine, whereas gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin have shown improved progression-free survival or time to tumour progression but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. The search for effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer continues. Gemcitabine in combination with cytotoxic agents or molecular targeted agents hold promise.

Inactivation of nuclear factor kappaB by soy isoflavone genistein contributes to increased apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents in human cancer cells

Cancer chemotherapeutic strategies commonly require multiple agents. However, use of multiple agents contributes to added toxicity resulting in poor treatment outcome. Thus, combination chemotherapy must be optimized to increase tumor response and at the same time lower its toxicity. Chemotherapeutic agents are known to induce nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) activity in tumor cells, resulting in lower cell killing and drug resistance. In contrast, genistein has been shown to inhibit the activity of NF-kappaB and the growth of various cancer cells without causing systemic toxicity. We therefore investigated whether the inactivation of NF-kappaB by genistein before treatment of various cancer cells with chemotherapeutic agents could lead to better tumor cell killing as tested by in vitro studies using gene transfections and also by animal studies. PC-3 (prostate), MDA-MB-231 (breast), H460 (lung), and BxPC-3 (pancreas) cancer cells were pretreated with 15 to 30 micromol/L genistein for 24 hours and then exposed to low doses of chemotherapeutic agents for an additional 48 to 72 hours. We found that 15 to 30 micromol/L genistein combined with 100 to 500 nmol/L cisplatin, 0.5 to 2 nmol/L docetaxel, or 50 ng/mL doxorubicin resulted in significantly greater inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis compared with either agent alone. Moreover, we found that the NF-kappaB activity was significantly increased within 2 hours of cisplatin and docetaxel treatment and that the NF-kappaB inducing activity of these agents was completely abrogated in cells pretreated with genistein. These results were also supported, for the first time, by animal experiments, p65 cDNA transfection and p65 small interfering RNA studies, which clearly showed that a specific target (NF-kappaB) was affected in vivo. Collectively, our results clearly suggest that genistein pretreatment inactivates NF-kappaB and may contribute to increased growth inhibition and apoptosis induced by cisplatin, docetaxel, and doxorubicin in prostate, breast, lung, and pancreatic cancer cells. Theses results warrant carefully designed clinical studies investigating the combination of soy isoflavones and commonly used chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancers.

Primary tumor of pancreatic cancer as a measurable target lesion in chemotherapy trials

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether primary pancreatic cancer (PC) tumors can be accepted as measurable target lesions in chemotherapy trials. We reviewed recent PC patients to clarify the significance of their computed tomography (CT) responses of the primary tumor after chemotherapy.

METHODS

The patient selection criteria were (i) having been admitted between January 2002 and December 2004, (ii) diagnosed as having histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, (iii) treated with chemotherapy with no previous anticancer treatment and (iv) having been evaluated by follow-up CT to assess the response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients met the selection criteria. It was possible to measure the largest diameter of the primary tumor in 119 (83%) of the 143, and primary tumor shrinkage was observed in 10 (8%) of the 119. When regarding the primary as measurable as opposed to non-measurable, the number of patients with measurable disease became 127 from 67, and the frequencies of partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) became 11, 74 and 15% of the 127 from 18, 52 and 30% of the 67, respectively. In the former situation, large primary tumor sometimes canceled the shrinkage or progression of small metastasis. In each setting, PR or SD represented a favorable prognosis compared with PD, however, there were no statistical differences between the PR and the SD.

CONCLUSION

Measuring the primary tumor is acceptable in approximately 80% of PC patients. However, we must be aware that the frequency of SD may increase compared with the PR or PD.

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Noninvasive assessment of tumor vascularity by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and the prognosis of patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that angiogenesis is one of the factors that influences the prognosis of patients with solid tumors, including pancreatic carcinomas. However, none have assessed noninvasively the relation between angiogenesis and prognosis in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) not only is a convenient, harmless, and noninvasive imaging modality, but it also provides detailed information on tumor vascularity. The objectives of this study were to assess the vascularity of pancreatic carcinoma noninvasively by contrast-enhanced US and to clarify the prognostic value of tumor vascularity in patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed, nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma were examined with contrast-enhanced US before systemic chemotherapy. The correlations among tumor vascularity, clinicopathologic factors, and clinical outcomes then were analyzed statistically to investigate prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

The median time to progression (TTP) was longer in patients who had avascular tumors compared with patients who had vascular tumors (110 days vs. 28 days, respectively; P=0.0072; log-rank test). The median survival also was longer in patients who had avascular tumors (267 days vs. 115 days, respectively; P=0.0034; log-rank test). A multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model revealed that tumor vascularity was a significant, independent factor that influenced TTP (P <0.001) and survival (P=0.022) along with primary tumor size and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, which are well known as prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that contrast-enhanced US may be useful in assessing the prognosis of patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma who receive systemic chemotherapy.

Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Surgery for pancreatic cancer offers a low success rate but it provides the only likelihood of cure. Modern series show that, in experienced hands, the standard Whipple procedure is associated with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%, with a perioperative mortality rate of less than 5%. Most patients, however, will develop recurrent disease within 2 years after curative treatment. This occurs, usually, either at the site of resection or in the liver. This suggests the presence of micrometastases at the time of operation. Negative lymph nodes are the strongest predictor for long-term survival. Other predictors for a favourable outcome are tumour size, radical surgery and a histopathologically well-differentiated tumour. Adjuvant therapy has, so far, shown only modest results, with 5FU chemotherapy, to date, the only proven agent able to increase survival. Nowadays, the choice of therapy should be based on histopathological assessment of the tumour. Knowledge of the molecular basis of pancreatic cancer has led to various discoveries concerning its character and type. Well-known examples of genetic mutations in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are k-ras, p53, p16, DPC4. Use of molecular diagnostics and markers in the assessment of tumour biology may, in future, reveal important subtypes of this type of tumour and may possibly predict the response to adjuvant therapy. Defining the subtypes of pancreatic cancer will, hopefully, lead to target-specific, less toxic and finally more effective therapies. Long-term survival is observed in only a very small group of patients, contradicting the published actuarial survival rates of 10%-45%. Assessment of clinical benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy should, therefore, not only be based on actuarial survival but also on progression-free survival, actual survival, median survival and quality of life (QOL) indicators. Survival in surgical series is usually calculated by actuarial methods. If there is no information on the total number of patients and the number of actual survivors, and no clear definition of the subset of patients, actuarial survival curves can prove to be misleading. Proper assessment of QOL after surgery and adjuvant therapy is of the utmost importance, as improvements in survival rates have, so far, proved to be disappointing.

Apoptosis-inducing effect of chemotherapeutic agents is potentiated by soy isoflavone genistein, a natural inhibitor of NF-kappaB in BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell line

Cancer chemotherapeutic strategies should be devised to provide higher tumor response and lower toxicity for combination chemotherapy. Genistein has been shown to inhibit the growth of various cancer cells in vitro and in vivo without toxicity to normal cells. The antitumor effects of genistein could be in part due to inactivation of NF-kappaB activity. In contrast, chemotherapeutic agents inadvertently induce NF-kappaB activity, which may lead to chemoresistance. In this study, we investigated whether the inactivation of NF-kappaB by genistein would enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells were pretreated with 30 micromol/L genistein for 24 hours and then exposed to lower concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents for an additional 24 hours. Cell growth inhibition assay, apoptosis assay, and NF-kappaB EMSA were performed. The combination of 30 micromol/L genistein with 1 nmol/L docetaxel or 100 nmol/L cisplatin elicited significantly greater inhibition of cell growth compared with either agent alone. The combination treatment induced more apoptosis in BxPC-3 cells compared with single agents. Moreover, the NF-kappaB activity was significantly increased within 2 hours of docetaxel or cisplatin treatment, and the NF-kappaB-inducing activity of these agents was completely abrogated in cells pretreated with genistein. These results clearly suggest that genistein pretreatment, which inactivates NF-kappaB activity, together with other cellular effects of genistein, may contribute to increased cell growth inhibition and apoptosis inducing effects of nontoxic doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, which could be a novel strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.