Humoral immune response to a therapeutic polyvalent cancer vaccine after complete resection of thick primary melanoma and sentinel lymphadenectomy

Targeting tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens: a phase I study of a carbohydrate mimetic-peptide vaccine in stage IV breast cancer subjects

Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) support cell survival that could be interrupted by anti-TACA antibodies. Among TACAs that mediate cell survival signals are the neolactoseries antigen Lewis Y (LeY) and the ganglioside GD2. To induce sustained immunity against both LeY and GD2, we developed a carbohydrate mimicking peptide (CMP) as a surrogate pan-immunogen that mimics both. This CMP, referred to as P10s, is the N-terminal half of a peptide vaccine named P10s-PADRE, the C-terminal half of which (PADRE) is a Pan-T-cell epitope. A Phase I dose-escalation trial of P10s-PADRE plus adjuvant MONTANIDE™ ISA 51 VG was conducted in subjects with metastatic breast cancer to test 300 and 500 μg/injection in two cohorts of 3 subjects each. Doses of the P10s-PADRE vaccine were administered to research participants subcutaneously on weeks 1, 2, 3, 7 and 19. Antibody responses to P10s, GD2, and LeY were measured by ELISA. The P10s-PADRE vaccine induced antibodies specifically reactive with P10s, LeY and GD2 in all 6 subjects. Serum antibodies displayed Caspase-3-dependent apoptotic functionality against LeY or GD2 expressing breast cancer cell lines. Immunization with the P10s-PADRE vaccine was well-tolerated and induced functional antibodies, and the data suggest potential clinical benefit.

An Operational Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging System Prototype for Large Animal Surgery

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging has the potential to revolutionize human cancer surgery by providing sensitive, specific, and real-time intraoperative visualization of normal and disease processes. We have previously introduced the concept of a low-cost, safe, and easy-to-use NIR fluorescence imaging system that permits the surgeon to “see” surgical anatomy and NIR fluorescence simultaneously, non-invasively, with high spatial resolution, in real-time, and without moving parts [Nakayama et al. Molecular Imaging 1, 365–377 (2002)]. In this study, we present an operational prototype designed specifically for use during large animal surgery. Such a system serves as a foundation for future clinical studies. We discuss technical considerations, and provide details of the implementation of subsystems related to excitation light, light collection, computer, and software. Using the prototype, and the clinically available NIR fluorophore indocyanine green, we demonstrate vascular imaging in 35 kg pigs. Cancer-specific applications of this imaging system include image-guided cancer resection with real-time assessment of surgical margins, image-guided sentinel lymph node mapping, intraoperative mapping of tumor and normal vasculature, image-guided avoidance of critical structures such as nerves, and intraoperative detection of occult metastases in the surgical field. Taken together, this study describes an optical imaging system engineered for eventual translation to the clinic.

Biomarkers in melanoma: Stage III and IV disease

The prognosis associated with Stage III melanoma is variable (17-65% 5-year survival) and primarily influenced by the number of lymph nodes involved, the presence of ulceration in a primary lesion, and the tumor burden present in each lymph node. In patients with metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma, the prognosis remains dismal (6-18% 5-year survival) and is influenced primarily by the sites (and extent) of metastatic involvement. Serum lactate dehydrogenase is the only prognostic biomarker useful in metastatic melanoma and it has been incorporated into the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging system. In this review, the known prognostic factors in Stage III and IV melanoma are reviewed. Selected investigational therapies and associated biomarkers are also discussed.

Immunoediting and antigen loss: overcoming the achilles heel of immunotherapy with antigen non-specific therapies

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a mainstream therapy option in the battle against cancer. Pre-clinical data demonstrates the ability of immunotherapy to harness the immune system to fight disseminated malignancy. Clinical translation has failed to recapitulate the promising results of pre-clinical studies although there have been some successes. In this review we explore some of the short-comings of cancer immunotherapy that have limited successful clinical translation. We will give special consideration to what we consider the most formidable hurdle to successful cancer immunotherapy: tumor-induced immune suppression and immune escape. We will discuss the need for antigen-specific immune responses for successful immunotherapy but also consider the need for antigen specificity as an Achilles heel of immunotherapy given tumor heterogeneity, immune editing, and antigen loss. Finally, we will discuss how combinatorial strategies may overcome some of the pitfalls of antigen specificity and highlight recent studies from our lab which suggest that the induction of antigen non-specific immune responses may also produce robust anti-tumor effects and bypass the need for antigen specificity.

The role of antigen-specific and non-specific immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer

Immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer is increasing, particularly with the recent FDA approval of sipuleucel-T and ipilimumab. The efficacy of anti-tumor immunotherapies has been modest compared to their theoretical and pre-clinical promise. This review evaluates the promise and pitfalls of immunotherapy and highlight some of the obstacles to improving anti-tumor immunotherapy: the need for technical refinement of therapies, the need for an increased understanding of how best to combine therapies with traditional cytotoxic therapies, the inability of patients to mount an effective immune response either due to disease burden or tumor induced immune suppression, the significant toxicities associated with many immunotherapies, and the lack of strongly immunogenic antigens required by many therapies. Further, antigen-non-specific immunotherapies, including cytokines such as interleukins and interferons, immuno-stimulatory agents such as CpG oligonucleotides, or BCG, antibodies targeted against receptors such as the agonistic CD40 or inhibitory CTLA-4 antibodies, and enzyme inhibitors such as those targeting cyclo-oxygenase or indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase are discussed. In addition, potential mechanisms of these therapies such as direct anti-tumor effects, reversal of immune suppression, activation of innate immunity, and antigen-non-specific T-cell activation are reviewed. We also appraise the potential of these antigen-non-specific therapies to overcome some of the previously described pitfalls of immunotherapy. Lastly, we discuss a recent series of studies from our laboratory demonstrating the importance of antigen-non-specific 'bystander activation' of memory T-lymphocytes by immunomodulatory therapies such as interleukin-2 and the antigen-non-specific anti-tumor effects of these cells.

Melanoma vaccines

There is much renewed activity in the testing of vaccines that target metastatic melanoma, driven by successes in other areas, most notably prostate cancer. Yet, sound evidence that any stand-alone vaccination approach has clinical benefit against melanoma remains lacking. With phase III studies showing no efficacy of promising whole-cell vaccines and heat shock proteins, peptide and dendritic cell vaccines remain the most common approaches. A major obstacle to progress is the lack of any surrogate measures in phase II studies that associate meaningfully with clinical benefit, and this is further complicated by phase III evidence in prostate cancer that immunologic monitoring, tumor response rates, or even times to tumor progression may not accurately predict survival benefit. The area with the most progress has been in combining vaccines with other systemic immunostimulatory agents. Although no vaccine has been found which fulfills the prediction from murine models that they can enhance the efficacy of ipilimumab, combining a peptide vaccination with high-dose interleukin 2 was shown to enhance complete and overall response rates compared with interleukin 2 alone. These promising combinations continue to struggle with the same unresolved issues that have plagued melanoma vaccines from the beginning-what are the best antigens to target, what are the best methods of vaccination, and what constitutes a sufficient immune response to be of value? Virtually no progress has been made toward answering these questions.

Systemic therapy of non-resectable metastatic melanoma

In advanced metastatic melanoma (non-resectable stage III/IV), the prognosis still remains poor, with median survival times between six and twelve months. Systemic therapeutic approaches for metastatic melanoma include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, immunochemotherapy, small molecules and targeted therapy. In this review, we will focus on the various treatment modalities as well as new agents used for targeted therapy.

Melanoma biomarkers: Vox clamantis in deserto (Review)

Detecting malignant melanoma at an early stage, monitoring therapy, predicting recurrence and identifying patients at risk for metastasis continue to be a challenging and demanding objective. The last two decades have witnessed innovations in the field of melanoma biomarkers. However, global agreement concerning monitoring and early detection has yet to be reached. This is a review of the current literature regarding melanoma biomarkers including demographic, clinical, pathological and molecular biomarkers that are produced by melanoma or non-melanoma cells. A number of these biomarkers demonstrate promising results as possible methods for early detection, predicting recurrence and monitoring therapy. Other biomarkers appear to be promising for identifying patients at risk for metastasis. We reviewed the most pertinent information in the field thus far and how this knowledge can impact, or not, the management of melanoma patients prognostically and therapeutically.

Lessons from randomized phase III studies with active cancer immunotherapies--outcomes from the 2006 meeting of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC)

After years of effort to develop active cancer immunotherapies, seven candidate products achieved promising results in phase I/II studies that triggered phase III randomized studies. One candidate to date has received an approvable letter from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), defining a clear path to licensure for sipuleucel-T (Provenge, Dendreon) within the next couple of years. The other phase III studies failed to achieve statistical criteria for some or all of the critical endpoints. Yet, there is widespread recognition that using a patient's own immune system to target and destroy cancer cells may offer an effective biological therapy with less toxicity than presently available anti-cancer therapies, and several candidates are still being evaluated in clinical studies. This review summarizes the lessons learned from these case studies, evaluates scientific, study design, and business factors that can affect study outcomes, identifies common challenges faced by sponsors developing these innovative therapies, and provides considerations for future study designs that may increase the likelihood of success.

Cell based cancer vaccines: regulatory and commercial development

There is both clinical and regulatory drive to expedite development of safe, efficacious cancer therapies. Stimulation of the patients immune system through vaccination with tumour cells has long been at the vanguard of cancer therapeutic vaccines, and several have been demonstrated to be safe and to have efficacy in early clinical trials for a range of cancers including melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate and colorectal cancers. A number of development-stage vaccines and strategies are currently being tested, utilising either autologous or allogeneic tumour cells, which may also have been ex vivo manipulated (e.g. cytokine transfected cells). It seems likely that clinical trial success, and hence patient benefit, could be improved through better patient identification, possibly by the discovery and use of novel immune response biomarkers. In this review, we aim to summarise the state of tumour cell vaccines in commercial development and to explore not only the difficulties of determining efficacy, but also the production challenges faced when developing a vaccine from proof of principle to pivotal phase III trials.

Evaluation of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Melanoma

These data show that the extraordinary potency of the immune system can be harnessed to control or destroy melanoma. The proven impact has been limited for patients who have melanoma, but has been dramatic and lasting in selected groups. Recent improvements in understanding of immunology, including mechanisms regulating immune responses and methods of tumor cell escape, are already yielding improved clinical outcomes and potential avenues for extending benefits to more patients. Thus, although the full potential of this treatment modality has yet to be realized, the vanguard of the "treatment of tomorrow" has clearly arrived.

First International Symposium on Melanoma and Other Cutaneous Malignancies

The First International Symposium on Melanoma and Other Cutaneous Malignancies, held in New York City on 23-25 April 2004, brought together researchers and clinicians from all over the world to discuss recent advances in the prevention, treatment and diagnosis of melanoma and other cutaneous malignancies. Discussion topics included primary and secondary prevention; advances in surgical therapy, including sentinel and elective lymph node dissection; the biology and pathogenesis of melanoma, including pathways of drug resistance; genomic analysis of melanoma, serum and tumour cell markers; with point and counterpoint sessions debating therapeutic controversies. The role of vaccines in the management of melanoma was discussed, including cell vaccines, dendritic cell-based vaccination and present research to improve the generation of melanoma vaccine-specific immunity. Adjuvant immunotherapy with high-dose IFN-alpha and an ongoing trial with biochemotherapy were debated. In addition, the role of chemotherapy and novel targeted agents in metastatic melanoma were discussed. Among the emerging agents and therapeutic targets presented were Bcl-2 antisense therapy, RAF kinases, heat-shock proteins, thalidomide and newer immunomodulatory drugs, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody and topical imiquimod. The symposium also provided an overview of existing and emerging agents and modalities in the management of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, ocular melanoma and melanoma involving brain metastases. Sessions also included case-based learning and devoted ample time to providing 'how to' information for practising physicians.

Antigen-based immunotherapy of melanoma: Canvaxin therapeutic polyvalent cancer vaccine

As yet there are no FDA-approved cancer vaccines for malignant melanoma, but encouraging response rates and low toxicities reported in phase I/II trials suggest that antigen-based active immunotherapy may complement current treatment modalities. The cumulative data for Canvaxin therapeutic polyvalent cancer vaccine represent the largest phase II clinical trial of any cancer vaccine. Univariate and multivariate analyses of these data have demonstrated the prognostic significance of this allogeneic whole-cell preparation as a postoperative adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III and IV melanoma. The vaccine has also been shown promising results after resection of stage II melanoma and in patients with regional in-transit disease. The consistent correlation between immune and clinical responses to the vaccine suggests that immune parameters may be used to monitor a patient's response to vaccine therapy.