Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study

Palliative Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Intractable Cancer-Related Pain Due to Malignant Psoas Syndrome: Case Report

Uncontrollable cancer pain is a highly feared and debilitating symptom. The effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for osseous metastases with intractable cancer-related pain refractory to pharmacological therapy has been reported previously. This case report is the first to demonstrate the use of RFA to achieve pain relief in a patient suffering severe pain caused by para-aortic lymph node metastasis. A 55-year-old male complained of intractable pain in the left groin and perineum due to malignant psoas syndrome caused by metastatic para-aortic lymph nodes. The pain was refractory to medications including opioids and nerve blocks. Considering the dermatome indicating referred pain and the imaging findings, RFA of the area of invasion was performed at the L3 level. The severe pain was relieved within 24 hours without any complications. Opioids were tapered at each postoperative outpatient visit. We discuss the use of RFA for control of intractable cancer-related pain refractory to medication, including opioids.

Interventional management of malignant bone tumours

In the last few decades, interventional radiology (IR) has significantly increased its role in the management of bone tumours including bone metastases (BM) that represent the most common type of tumour involving the bone. The current IR management of BM is based on the 'palliative-curative' paradigm and relies on the use of consolidative (i.e. osteplasty, osteosynthesis) and/or ablation (i.e. cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, electrochemotherapy) techniques. The present narrative review will overview the current role of IR for the management of BM.

Management of metastatic bone disease of the pelvis: current concepts

PURPOSE

Metastatic disease of the pelvis is frequently associated with severe pain and impaired ambulatory function. Depending on the patient's characteristics, primary tumor, and metastatic pelvic disease, the treatment choice may be varied. This study aims to report on the current management options of metastatic pelvic disease.

METHODS

We comprehensively researched multiple databases and evaluated essential studies about current concepts of managing a metastatic bone disease of the pelvis, focusing on specific indications as well as on the result of treatment.

RESULTS

Pelvic metastases not in the periacetabular region can be managed with modification of weight-bearing, analgesics, bisphosphonates, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Minimally invasive approaches include radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, embolization, percutaneous osteoplasty, and percutaneous screw placement. Pathological or impending periacetabular fracture, excessive periacetabular bone defect, radioresistant tumor, and persistent debilitating pain despite non-surgical treatment and/or minimally invasive procedures can be managed with different surgical techniques. Overall, treatment can be divided into nonoperative, minimally invasive, and operative based on specific indications, the expectations of the patient and the lesion.

CONCLUSION

Different treatment modalities exist to manage metastatic pelvic bone disease. Decision-making for the most appropriate treatment should be made with a multidisciplinary approach based on a case-by-case basis.

Tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral metastases: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of metastatic vertebral fractures without neural compression is performed with percutaneous cementation techniques. The increase in intratumoral pressure by these techniques can send tumor cells into the bloodstream. To prevent this dissemination and improve pain treatment, ablation techniques have been introduced that would allow the creation of a cavity in the tumor prior to cementation or directly necrosing the metastasis when its size is small.

MATERIAL

We present the experience with ablation of two hospitals and two different ablation techniques. The first group used radiofrequency ablation (A) in 14 patients (26 vertebrae), 4 of whom underwent vertebral arthrodesis. The second group used microwave ablation (B) in 93 patients (129 lesions) without associated vertebral instrumentation.

RESULTS

In group A pain improvement in VAS was 7.7-2.6 at 6 weeks. There were no complications derived from the ablation. In most cases cementation was associated. In the group B pain improvement in VAS went from 6.8-1.7 at 6 weeks. Cementation was associated in all cases. There were no complications derived from the ablation.

CONCLUSION

The association of ablation techniques with vertebral cementation is a safe technique that significantly improves the patient's pain and can help control the disease.

[Translated article] Tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral metastases: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of metastatic vertebral fractures without neural compression is performed with percutaneous cementation techniques. The increase in intratumoral pressure by these techniques can send tumor cells into the bloodstream. To prevent this dissemination and improve pain treatment, ablation techniques have been introduced that would allow the creation of a cavity in the tumor prior to cementation or directly necrosing the metastasis when its size is small.

MATERIAL

We present the experience with ablation of two hospitals and two different ablation techniques. The first group used radiofrequency ablation (A) in 14 patients (26 vertebrae), 4 of whom underwent vertebral arthrodesis. The second group used microwave ablation (B) in 93 patients (129 lesions) without associated vertebral instrumentation.

RESULTS

In group A pain improvement in VAS was 7.7-2.6 at 6 weeks. There were no complications derived from the ablation. In most cases cementation was associated. In the group B pain improvement in VAS went from 6.8 to 1.7 at 6 weeks. Cementation was associated in all cases. There were no complications derived from the ablation.

CONCLUSION

The association of ablation techniques with vertebral cementation is a safe technique that significantly improves the patient's pain and can help control the disease.

Management of Spinal Metastasis by Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques: Surgical Principles and Indications-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Spinal metastasis is becoming more frequent. This raises the topics of pain and neurological complications, which worsen the functional and survival prognosis of oncological population patients. Surgical treatment must be as complete as possible in order to decompress and stabilize without delaying the management of the oncological disease. Minimally invasive spine surgical techniques inflict less damage on the musculocutaneous plan than opened ones.

METHODS

Different minimally invasive techniques are proposed in this paper for the management of spinal metastasis. We used our experience, developed degenerative and traumatic pathologies, and referred to many authors, establishing a narrative review of our local practice.

RESULTS

Forty-eight articles were selected, and these allowed us to describe the different techniques: percutaneous methods such as vertebro/kyphoplasty, osteosynthesis, mini-open surgery, or that through a posterior or anterior approach. Also, some studies detail the contribution of new technologies, such as intraoperative CT scan and robotic assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems essential to offer a lasting solution to a spinal problem, such as in the form of pain relief, stabilization, and decompression. Our department has embraced a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to MISS, incorporating cutting-edge technologies and evidence-based practices.

Percutaneous Vertebral Reconstruction (PVR) Technique of Pathological Compression Fractures: An Innovative Combined Treatment of Microwave Ablation, Bilateral Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants Followed by Vertebroplasty

(1) Background: to retrospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of combined microwave ablation (MWA) and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack (SJ) implants followed by vertebroplasty (VP) for the treatment of painful thoracolumbar pathological vertebral compression fracture. (2) Methods: from July 2017 to October 2022, twenty-eight patients (13 women and 15 men; mean age 68 ± 11 years) with a history of primary neoplasm and thirty-six painful vertebral metastases with vertebral compression fracture underwent combined MWA and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty. We analyzed safety through complications rate, and efficacy through vertebral height restoration and pain decrease, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), and local tumor control. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI at 6 months after the procedure. (3) Results: Technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications or death occurred. Vertebral height restoration was observed in 22 levels (58%), with a mean anterior height restoration of 2.6 mm ± 0.6 and a mean middle height restoration of 4.4 mm ± 0.6 (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score of pain evaluation on the day before treatment was 6.3 ± 1.5 (range 4-9). At the 6-month evaluation, the median VAS score for pain was 0.4 ± 0.6 (range 0-2) with a mean reduction of 93.65% (6.8 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.6; p < 0.000) compared with baseline evaluation. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI was performed at 6 months after the procedure, showing no local recurrence, implant displacement, or new fractures in the treated site. (4) Conclusions: combined microwave ablation and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of pathological compressive vertebral fractures. The vertebral stabilization achieved early and persistent pain relief, increasing patient mobility, improving recovery of walking capacity, and providing local tumor control.

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of a presumed enchondroma in the flat bones of the pelvis

Herein, a 30-year-old Caucasian female who presented with a persistent pain in the right pelvic region due to an enchondroma and treated with RF ablation is described. An initial MRI of the pelvis revealed a well-circumscribed lesion in the right inferior ischiopubic ramus with a maximum diameter of 9.5 mm. The final diagnosis was established by a percutaneous CT-guided bone biopsy, which excluded malignancy and revealed an enchondroma. About a month after the biopsy, a percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lesion was performed. The symptoms resolved completely gradually 2 months after the treatment and a follow-up imaging with MRI showed complete resolution of the pathological enhancement indicating necrosis of the lesion. RFA has not been previously reported as a treatment option of enchondromas found in flat bones of the pelvis and could be a safe alternative minimally invasive treatment option in such cases, avoiding major operations.

Comparison of Percutaneous Interventional Ablation-Osteoplasty-Reinforcement-Internal Fixation (AORIF), Long Intramedullary Nailing, and Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Focal Metastatic Osteolytic Lesions in the Femoral Head and Neck

PURPOSE

Osteolytic metastatic lesions in the femoral head and neck are traditionally treated with intramedullary long nailing (IM) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recovery, surgical complications, and medical co-morbidities delay oncologic care. This study sought to elucidate the comparative efficacy of percutaneous ablation-osteoplasty-reinforcement-internal fixation (AORIF), IM, and HA in stabilizing osteolytic lesions in the femoral head and neck.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 67 patients who underwent IM, AORIF, or HA for osteolytic femoral head and neck lesions was performed. Primary outcome was assessed using a combined pain and ambulatory score (Range 1-10: 1 = bedbound, 10 = normal ambulation) at first follow-up (~ 2 weeks). Surgical complications associated with each treatment were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (mean age, 65 ± 13, 36 men and 31 women) underwent IM (40), AORIF (19), and HA (8) with a mean follow-up of 9 ± 11 months. Two patients in the IM group (5%), three in the AORIF group (16%), and none in the HA (0%) group required revision procedures. AORIF demonstrated superior early improvement in combined pain and ambulatory function scores by 3.0 points [IQR = 2.0] (IM p = 0.0008, HA p = 0.0190). Odds of post-operative complications was 10.3 times higher in HA than IM (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 60.3). Future revision procedures were not found to be statistically significant between AORIF and IM (p = 0.234).

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive interventional skeletal procedure for focal femoral head and neck osteolytic lesions may serve as an effective alternative treatment to traditional surgical approaches, conferring a shorter recovery time and fewer medical complications.

Radiofrequency Ablation Provides Rapid and Durable Pain Relief for the Palliative Treatment of Lytic Bone Metastases Independent of Radiation Therapy: Final Results from the OsteoCool Tumor Ablation Post-Market Study

PURPOSE

The OsteoCool Tumor Ablation Post-Market Study (OPuS One) was a prospective, multi-national, single-arm study to investigate safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for palliation of painful lytic bone metastases with 12 months of follow-up. RFA has demonstrated effective palliation of osseous metastases in small clinical studies with short-term follow-up; however, a long-term assessment with robust subject numbers is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective assessments were conducted at Baseline, 3 days, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12-months. Pain and quality of life were measured prior to RFA and postoperatively using the Brief Pain Inventory, European Quality of Life-5 Dimension, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Care Quality of Life Questionnaire for palliative care. Radiation, chemotherapy and opioid usage, and related adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

206 subjects were treated with RFA at 15 institutions in OPuS One. Worst pain, average pain, pain interference and quality of life significantly improved at all visits starting 3 days post-RFA and sustained to 12 months (P < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis found neither systemic chemotherapy nor local radiation therapy at the index site of RFA influenced worst pain, average pain, or pain interference. Six subjects had device/procedure-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

RFA for lytic metastases provides rapid (within 3 days) and statistically significant pain and quality of life improvements with sustained long-term relief through 12 months and a high degree of safety, independent of radiation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2B, PROSPECTIVE, NON-RANDOMIZED, POST-MARKET STUDY: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pharmacologic Pain Management: What Radiation Oncologists Should Know

Individuals with cancer experience a host of symptoms, especially when the malignancy is advanced. Pain occurs from the cancer itself or related treatments. Undertreated pain contributes to patient suffering and lack of engagement in cancer-directed therapies. Adequate pain management includes thorough assessment; treatment by radiotherapists or anesthesia pain specialists; anti-inflammatory medications, oral or intravenous opioid analgesics, and topical agents; and attention to the emotional and functional effects of pain, which may involve social workers, psychologists, speech therapists, nutritionists, physiatrists and palliative medicine providers. This review discusses typical pain syndromes arising in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and provides concrete recommendations for pain assessment and pharmacologic treatment.

Role of interventional radiology in pain management in oncology patients

This article reviews the current evidence of interventional radiology procedures for patients suffering with debilitating cancer pain, refractory to conventional therapies. Cancer pain is notoriously difficult to treat. Up to 90% of cancer patients experience pain with 56-82% of cancer pain controlled inadequately. Cancer pain influences a patient's ability to perform normal daily activities, causes higher risk of depression, and reduces quality of life. Pain-free status has been universally voted as a "good death". Alternative minimally invasive options include nerve blocks, neurolysis, bone ablation, spine and peripheral musculoskeletal augmentation techniques, embolisation, and cordotomy with evidence highlighting improved pain control, reduced analgesic requirements, and improved quality of life. Unfortunately, awareness and availability of these procedures is limited, potentially leaving patients suffering during their remaining life. The purpose of this review is to describe the basic concepts of interventional radiology techniques for pain palliation in oncology patients. In addition, emphasis will be given upon the need for an individually tailored approach aiming to augment efficacy and safety.

Precision pain management in interventional radiology

Pain is a common manifestation of several benign and malignant conditions. Inadequate response to conservative therapies is often succeeded by incremental use of analgesics and opioids; however, such an approach is often ineffective, not well tolerated by patients, and carries the risk of addiction leading to the opioid crisis. Implementing minimally invasive percutaneous procedures, performed by interventional radiologists has proven to be successful in providing safe, effective, and patient-specific therapies across a wide range of painful conditions. In the present narrative review, we will review the repertoire of minimally invasive imaging guided interventions, which have been successfully used to treat common painful benign and malignant conditions. We briefly describe each technique, common indications, and expected results.

Percutaneous CT-Guided Microwave Ablation Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation Followed by Vertebroplasty (MASFVA): Initial Experience of a Minimally Invasive Treatment of Vertebral Metastases with Extension to the Vertebral Pedicle

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and pedicle screw fixation followed by vertebroplasty (MASFVA) for the treatment and stabilization of painful vertebral metastases with vertebral pedicle involvement. (2) Methods: from January 2013 to January 2017 11 patients with 16 vertebral metastatic lesions (7 men and 5 women; mean age, 65 ± 11 years) with vertebral metastases underwent CT-guided microwave ablation and screw fixation followed by vertebroplasty (MASFVA). Technical success, complication rate, pain evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and local tumor control were examined. (3) Results: Technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications occurred. VAS score decreased from 6.8 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.6. ODI score decreased from 3.1 ± 0.7 to 1.2 ± 0.4. All patients could walk independently without neurological complication after one week from the procedure. No new bone fractures or local disease recurrence occurred during a median follow-up of 12 months. (4) Conclusions: Our results suggest that MWA and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation followed by vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful vertebral metastases is a safe and effective procedure for painful vertebral metastases with vertebral pedicle involvement, allowing pain relief and local tumor control.

Surgical robot-assisted tripod percutaneous reconstruction technique combined with bone cement filling technique for the treatment of acetabular metastasis

Background: Acetabular metastasis is a type of metastatic bone cancer, and it mainly metastasizes from cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and renal carcinoma. Acetabular metastasis often causes severe pain, pathological fractures, and hypercalcemia which may seriously affect the quality of life of acetabular metastasis patients. Due to the characteristics of acetabular metastasis, there is no most suitable treatment to address it. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate a novel treatment technique to relieve these symptoms. Methods: Our study explored a novel technique to reconstruct the stability of the acetabular structure. A surgical robot was used for accurate positioning and larger-bore cannulated screws were accurately inserted under the robot's guidance. Then, the lesion was curetted and bone cement was injected through a screw channel to further strengthen the structure and kill tumor cells. Results: A total of five acetabular metastasis patients received this novel treatment technique. The data relating to surgery were collected and analyzed. The results found that this novel technique can significantly reduce operation time, intraoperative bleeding, visual analogue score scores, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, and postoperative complications (e.g., infection, implant loosening, hip dislocation) after treatment. Follow-up time ranged from 3 months to 6 months, and the most recent follow-up results showed that all patients survived and no acetabular metastasis progressed in any of the patients after surgery. Conclusion: Surgical robot-assisted tripod percutaneous reconstruction combined with the bone cement filling technique may be a novel and suitable treatment in acetabular metastasis patients. Our study may provide new insights into the treatment of acetabular metastasis.

Juxtametallic Bipolar Bone Radiofrequency Ablation: Thermal Monitoring in an Ex-Vivo Model with Specimen MRI and Histopathologic Correlation

PURPOSE

To measure the ablation zone temperature and nontarget tissue temperature during radiofrequency (RF) ablation in bone containing metal instrumentation versus no metal instrumentation (control group).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ex vivo experiments were performed on 15 swine vertebrae (control, n = 5; titanium screw, n = 5; stainless steel screw, n = 5). Screws and RF ablation probe were inserted identically under fluoroscopy. During RF ablation (3 W, 5 minutes), temperature was measured 10 mm from RF ablation centerpoint and in muscle contacting the screw. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, gross pathologic, and histopathologic analyses were performed on 1 specimen from each group.

RESULTS

Ablation zone temperatures at 2.5 and 5 minutes increased by 12.2 °C ± 2.6 °C and 21.5 °C ± 2.1 °C (control); 11.0 °C ± 4.1 °C and 20.0 °C ± 2.9 °C (juxta-titanium screw), and 10.0 °C ± 3.4 °C and 17.2 °C ± 3.5 °C (juxta-stainless steel) screw; differences among groups did not reach significance by analysis of variance (P = .87). Mixed-effects linear regression revealed a statistically significant increase in temperature over time in all 3 groups (4.2 °C/min ± 0.4 °C/min, P < .001). Compared with the control, there was no significant difference in the temperature change over time for titanium (-0.3 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .53) or steel groups (-0.4 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .38). The mean screw temperature at the final time point did not show a statistically significant change compared with baseline in either the titanium group (-1.2 °C ± 2.3 °C, P = .50) or steel group (2.6 °C ± 2.9 °C, P = .11). MR imaging and pathologic analyses revealed homogeneous ablation without sparing of the peri-hardware zones.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjacent metallic instrumentation did not affect the rate of or absolute increase in temperature in the ablation zone, did not create peri-metallic ablation inhomogeneities, and did not result in significant nontarget heating of muscle tissue in contact with the metal instrumentation.

Management of cancer pain due to bone metastasis

Bone metastases frequently occur in patients with cancer. Skeletal-related events (SREs), including pain, impaired mobility, hypercalcemia, pathological fracture, spinal cord and nerve root compression, and bone marrow infiltration, can decrease the quality of life of the patients and increase the risk of morbidity. The mechanism of pain due to bone metastasis is complicated and involves various interactions among tumor cells, bone cells, activated inflammatory cells, and bone-innervating neurons. Cancer pain due to bone metastasis can be crippling and a chronic state that causes sarcopenia. For pain management, it is important to diagnose whether the pain is based on background pain or breakthrough pain due to bone metastasis. In addition, the management goal of cancer pain due to bone metastasis is not only to achieve pain relief but also to prevent pain progression and SREs. Pain mechanisms should be applied to achieve optimal management. This review aims to discuss the mechanisms of cancer pain due to bone metastasis and review the recommended drug therapies.

Assessing long-term locoregional control of spinal osseous metastases after microwave ablation

Osseous metastases to the spine result in significant pain and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of spinal metastases regarding pain reduction and local control of disease progression. In this single center retrospective study, patients with osseous metastases to the spine undergoing MWA with vertebroplasty from 2013 to 2020 were included. Locoregional control of metabolic activity at the treated level was assessed using PET/CT scan both pre- and post-procedure. Pain reduction was measured using change in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Forty-eight spinal levels were treated with MWA in 28 patients (57 % male, mean age 68 ± 9 years). Median ablation time, energy, and temperature were 4 min and 13 s, 3.6 kJ, and 80 °C, respectively. Median pre-procedure maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was significantly reduced following ablation, from 4.55 (IQR 3.65-6.1) to 0 (IQR 0-1.8; p < 0.001), over an average of 29 ± 14.1 month follow up period. Pre-procedure VAS pain score was reduced from median (IQR) of 8 (6.5-9) to 1(1-2), 2(1-3) and 1(0.5-3) at 24 h, four weeks, and six months post-procedure, respectively (all p < 0.001 with respect to pre-procedure scores). In conclusion, this study supports microwave ablation as an effective technique for pain palliation and long-term locoregional tumor control of oligometastatic spinal disease as assessed by metabolic response.

The 100 most cited papers on bone metastasis: A bibliometric analysis

•

Citations per article in the most 100 top cited articles ranged from 357 to 2167.

•

The leading country was USA, Canada, and United Kingdom.

•

Clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins.

•

Intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions was obvious between the selected papers.

Background

Over the past few decades, a vast number of articles focused on bone metastasis have been published. Bibliometric analysis is helpful to determine the qualities and characteristics and to reveal the influential articles in this field.

Methods

All the databases in Web of Science were utilized to identify articles published from 1961 to 2020. The top 100 most cited articles on bone metastases were involved for degree centrality analysis and analyses on publication time and citations, journals, authors, geographical distribution, research institutions, and research keywords.

Results

The selected articles were published mainly from 1986 to 2015. The 100 most cited articles were selected from a total of 67,451 citations out of 90,502 publications with a density of 50.239 citations/year. Citations per article ranged from 357 to 2167. The leading country was USA, followed by Canada and United Kingdom. The most frequently studied themes were clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins. A co-authorship analysis revealed an intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions.

Conclusions

This study identified the top 100 most cited articles on bone metastasis. Publication time, area, and theme distribution were thoroughly analyzed. The present study highlighted some of the most influential contributions to the field. Clinical and academic communities have shown a sustained interest in the management of bone metastasis.

Radiofrequency Ablation and Augmentation in the Management of Spinal Metastases: Clinical Experience in 41 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate functional outcome after combined radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation in patients with metastatic spinal tumors using visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 41 patients with metastatic spinal tumors. There were 19 women and 22 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 45-87 years). Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess the intensity of pain and quality of life. The assessments were performed before the procedure and at 1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

No serious complications were seen in the periprocedural period. Two patients (4.8%) had transient neurological motor deficits without cement leakage, and 1 patient had a pulmonary embolism with transient mild symptoms. The comparison of preprocedural visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores with postprocedural scores up to 6 months after treatment revealed significant pain control and good functional state.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal metastasis is a frequent entity in the growing population of patients with cancer. A multidisciplinary approach using several nonsurgical and minimally invasive methods (e.g., radiofrequency ablation, vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty) is key to successful management, and combining these procedures is effective against spinal metastatic pain.

Interventional Radiology in the Management of Metastases and Bone Tumors

Interventional Radiology (IR) has experienced an exponential growth in recent years. Technological advances of the last decades have made it possible to use new treatments on a larger scale, with good results in terms of safety and effectiveness. In musculoskeletal field, painful bone metastases are the most common target of IR palliative treatments; however, in selected cases of bone metastases, IR may play a curative role, also in combination with other techniques (surgery, radiation and oncology therapies, etc.). Primary malignant bone tumors are extremely rare compared with secondary bone lesions: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma are the most common; however, the role of interventional radiology in this fiels is marginal. In this review, the main techniques used in interventional radiology were examined, and advantages and limitations illustrated. Techniques of ablation (Radiofrequency, Microwaves, Cryoablation as also magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound), embolization, and Cementoplasty will be described. The techniques of ablation work by destruction of pathological tissue by thermal energy (by an increase of temperature up to 90 °C with the exception of the Cryoablation that works by freezing the tissue up to -40 °C). Embolization creates an ischemic necrosis by the occlusion of the arterial vessels that feed the tumor. Finally, cementoplasty has the aim of strengthening bone segment weakened by the growth of pathological tissue through the injection of cement. The results of the treatments performed so far were also assessed and presented focused the attention on the management of bone metastasis.

Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for Primary and Metastatic Tumors

Image-guided percutaneous ablation methods have been further developed during the recent two decades and have transformed the minimally invasive and precision features of treatment options targeting primary and metastatic tumors. They work by percutaneously introducing applicators to precisely destroy a tumor and offer much lower risks than conventional methods. There are usually shorter recovery periods, less bleeding, and more preservation of organ parenchyma, expanding the treatment options of patients with cancer who may not be eligible for resection. Image-guided ablation techniques are currently utilized for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors in various organs including the liver, pancreas, kidneys, thyroid and parathyroid, prostate, lung, bone, and soft tissue. This article provides a brief review of the various imaging modalities and available ablation techniques and discusses their applications and associated complications in various organs.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process

•

Evidence is emerging for new paradigms in the management of non-spine bone metastases.

•

Consensus was feasible amongst physicians in both academic and community-based practice settings.

•

Topics deemed of highest importance for consensus included referral for surgical stabilization and approach to peri-operative radiation, preferred radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic techniques, and clinical scenarios classified as potentially “complex” warranting multidisciplinary discussion.

Purpose

Methods and Materials

Results

Conclusions

Interventional Management of Painful Vertebral Body Metastases

Management of osseous metastatic disease has advanced over the years with the advent of ablation and interventional technologies. Painful metastatic vertebral body lesions have been particularly studied in the recent years, as open surgery is usually reserved for emergent cord compression. Minimally invasive options in managing these lesions include percutaneous vertebral augmentation, percutaneous ablation, and embolization. This article will include an overview of these procedures including the most recent literature.

Percutaneous CT-Guided Microwave Ablation Combined with Vertebral Augmentation for Treatment of Painful Spinal Metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Percutaneous thermal ablation followed by vertebral augmentation is an emerging minimally invasive therapeutic alternative for the management of spinal metastases. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation for the treatment of painful vertebral metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 91 patients with 140 metastatic vertebrae who experienced refractory moderate-to-severe pain were treated with CT-guided microwave ablation and vertebral augmentation. Procedural effectiveness was determined using the visual analog scale, daily morphine consumption, and the Oswestry Disability Index preprocedurally and during follow-up. Local tumor control was assessed at follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

The procedure was technically successful in all patients. The median visual analog scale score and mean morphine dose were 6 (range, 4-10) and 77.8 (SD, 31.5) mg (range, 15-143 mg), preprocedurally; 5 (range 3-8) and 34.5 (SD, 23.8) mg (range, 0-88 mg) at 3 days; 4 (range, 2-7) and 28.7 (SD, 16.4) mg (range, 0-73 mg) at 1 week; 3 (range, 1-6) and 24.6 (SD, 13.2) mg (range, 0-70 mg) at 1 month; 3 (range, 1-6) and 21.70 (SD, 10.0) mg (range, 0-42 mg) at 3 months; and 3 (range, 1-8) and 21.0 (SD, 9.9) mg (range, 0-46 mg) at 6 months postprocedurally (all P < .05). A decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score was also observed (P < .01). Local control was achieved in 94.8% of the treated metastatic vertebrae during the 6-month follow-up period. Asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 42 (30%) treated vertebrae. A grade 3 neural injury was observed in 1 patient (1.1%). The patient's neurologic function returned to normal following treatment with mannitol, glucocorticoids, and radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that percutaneous CT-guided microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation is a safe and effective minimally invasive intervention for the treatment of painful spinal metastases.

Practice patterns in the United States for ablation of osseous tumors using Medicare claims analysis

OBJECTIVES

To describe national practice trends in bone radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation for osseous lesions by physician specialty and site-of-service from 2015 to 2018.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services public use files for 2015-2018. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for bone RFA (20982) and cryoablation (20983) were analyzed. Based on the specialty code, the specialty was sorted into five categories: radiology (diagnostic and interventional), orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pain management (pain management, anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and interventional pain management), and all others. Annual volume of billed services was additionally evaluated by site of service and provider specialty.

RESULTS

Aggregate claims dramatically increased from 2015 to 2018. The enrollment adjusted overall growth averaged 45.2.% year-over-year, strongly driven by growth in RFA. Annual market share for radiology decreased slightly from 80.6% to 73.3% with neurosurgery making the largest gain, increasing from 4.7% to 11.3% from 2015 to 2018. Clinical site-of-service analysis demonstrated that outpatient is the main site-of-service for ablation (62.7% cumulatively from 2015 to 2018). Growth rates of outpatient and inpatient services are about the same over this time.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been significant growth in osseous ablation between 2015 and 2018, with the growth dominated by Radiologists, although the overall growth rate and the market share of radiology are declining as the growth is outstripped by neurosurgery and orthopedics. Further consideration of these trends will be important for interventional radiologists to assure their involvement and expertise in ablation procedures.

Management of Spinal Bone Metastases With Radiofrequency Ablation, Vertebral Reinforcement and Transpedicular Fixation: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series

Spine is a frequent site of bone metastases, with a 8.5 months median survival time after diagnosis. In most cases treatment is only palliative. Several advanced techniques can ensure a better Quality of Life (QoL) and increase life expectancy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses alternating current to produce local heating and necrosis of the spinal lesion, preserving the healthy bone. RFA is supported by vertebral reinforcement through kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in order to stabilize the fracture with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injection, restoring vertebral body height and reducing the weakness of healthy bone. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and advantages of RFA plus vertebral reinforcement through PMMA vertebroplasty and fixation in patients affected by bone spinal metastases. We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients with thoraco-lumbar metastatic vertebral fractures admitted to our Unit between January 2014 and June 2020. Each patient underwent RFA followed by PMMA vertebroplasty and transpedicle fixation. We evaluated pain relief through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score and PMMA vertebral filling based on the mean Saliou filling score. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test pain relief with statistical significance for p<0.05. A total of 54 patients (median age 63,44 years; range 34-86 years), with a total of 63 infiltrated vertebrae, were treated with RFA, PMMA vertebroplasty and transpedicular screw fixation; average operative time was 60.4 min (range 51–72). The preoperative average VAS score decreased significantly from 7.81 to 2.50 (p < 0.05) after 12 months. Based on Saliou filling score, filling was satisfactory (12–18) in 20 vertebrae (31,7%), mediocre (6–11) in 33 vertebrae (52,4%), inadequate (0–5) in 10 vertebrae (15,9%). A consistent PMMA filling of vertebral bodies was successfully achieved with significant pain relief. Concomitant RFA, PMMA vertebroplasty and pedicle screw fixation represent a safe and effective technique for the management of spinal metastases, improving clinical outcome and pain control.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Spine Metastases: A Clinical and Technical Approach

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an integral component of the multidisciplinary treatment algorithm for both local tumor control and palliation of painful spine metastases. This minimally invasive therapy complements additional treatment strategies, such as pain medications, systemic chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy. The location and size of the metastatic lesion dictate preprocedure planning and the technical approach. For example, ablation of lesions along the spinal canal, within the posterior vertebral elements, or with paraspinal soft tissue extension are associated with a higher risk of injury to adjacent spinal nerves. Additional interventions may be indicated in conjunction with RFA. For example, ablation of vertebral body lesions can precipitate new, or exacerbate existing, pathologic vertebral compression fractures that can be prevented with vertebral augmentation. This article reviews the indications, clinical work-up, and technical approach for RFA of spine metastases.

Efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) in the treatment of painful bone metastases through a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain scores before and after MRgFUS treatment and post-treatment adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed for studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of MRgFUS. The mean difference of pain scores (10-point visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale) between baseline and 1-month/3-month pain scores was collected and analyzed in a pooled meta-analysis. Post-treatment adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading were recorded and the pooled prevalence was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies published between 2007 and 2019 were collected, resulting in a total sample size of 1082 patients. The majority of the studies were prospective with a reported follow-up period of 3 months. The pooled proportion of patients that achieved pain relief from MRgFUS (complete response or partial response [≥ 2-point improvement of pain score]) was 79% (95% CI 73-83%). The pooled 1-month and 3-month mean difference in pain score were - 3.8 (95% CI - 4.3; - 3.3) and - 4.4 (95% CI - 5.0; - 3.7), respectively. The overall rate of high-grade (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) and low-grade (CTCAE grade 2 or lower) MRgFUS-related adverse events were 0.9% and 5.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRgFUS is an effective procedure that is able to provide significant pain palliation for patients with symptomatic bone metastases with a favorable safety profile.

Interventional Procedures for Vertebral Diseases: Spinal Tumor Ablation, Vertebral Augmentation, and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation-A Scoping Review

Low back pain is consistently documented as the most expensive and leading cause of disability. The majority of cases have non-specific etiologies. However, a subset of vertebral diseases has well-documented pain generators, including vertebral body tumors, vertebral body fractures, and vertebral endplate injury. Over the past two decades, specific interventional procedures targeting these anatomical pain generators have been widely studied, including spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation. This scoping review summarizes safety and clinical efficacy and discusses the impact on healthcare utilization of these interventions. Vertebral-related diseases remain a top concern with regard to prevalence and amount of health care spending worldwide. Our study shows that for a subset of disorders related to the vertebrae, spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation are safe and clinically effective interventions to decrease pain, improve function and quality of life, and potentially reduce mortality, improve survival, and overall offer cost-saving opportunities.

Role of radiofrequency ablation and cement injection for pain control in patients with spinal metastasis

Background

The study aimed to investigate the effects and reliability of simultaneous vertebroplasty and radiofrequency ablation or radiofrequency ablation applied alone for pain control in patients with painful spine metastasis, and to investigate the effect of preventing tumor spread in long-term follow-up.

Methods

Patients with painful vertebrae metastasis in the Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Medical Faculty, Hospital Neurosurgery Clinic between 01.01.2015 and 01.06.2020 were recruited. They were divided into groups according to the surgical procedures applied. Group 1 included 26 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation only, and group 2 included 40 patients who underwent vertebroplasty with radiofrequency ablation. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in all patients pre-operation. The patients were followed for at least 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at the end of the 6th month in neurologically stable patients. The metastatic lesion, pain, and quality of life were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Survey before and after the procedure.

Results

The mean VAS score before the procedure was 8.3 ± 1.07 in the RFA group, and a statistically significant difference was observed in VAS scores at all post-procedural measurement time-points (p < 0.001). The pain scores decreased at a rate of 58.8 and 69.6% of patients showed significant improvements in the QoL in the RFA-only group. The mean VAS score was 7.44 ± 1.06 in group RFA + VP before the procedure; the difference in the mean VAS scores was statistically significant at all measurement time-points after the procedure (p < 0.001). The mean pre-treatment Oswestry Index (to assess the QoL) was 78.50% in the RFA + VP group, which improved to 14.2% after treatment.

Conclusion

Ablation + vertebroplasty performed to control palliative pain and prevent tumor spread in patients with painful vertebral metastasis is more successful than vertebroplasty performed alone.

Cancer induced bone pain: current management and future perspectives

Recent improvements in the therapeutic armamentarium of oncology by the addition of targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have led to an increase in the life expectancy of advanced-stage cancer patients. This has led to an increased number of patients presenting with bone metastasis and experiencing episodes of cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP). CIBP is a crippling, chronic, morbid state interfering significantly with the functional capacity and the quality of life (QoL). CIBP is characterized by a complex multifactorial pathophysiological mechanism involving tumor cells, bone cells, inflammatory microenvironment, and the neuronal tissue. It may not be possible to mitigate pain completely; therefore, the aim should be to reach the lowest possible level of pain that allows for an acceptable QoL to the patient. Multimodality approach of surgical, radiation, medical and behavioral techniques is thus recommended to manage CIBP. This review discusses the pathogenesis and pathophysiological mechanism accompanying bone metastasis and CIBP, currently approved therapies for the management of CIBP, and the future perspective.

Image-Guided Breast Interventions: Biopsy and Beyond

Breast interventions primarily comprise of biopsy of the suspicious breast lesions to obtain accurate pathological diagnosis. Generally, image-guided breast biopsy is required for nonpalpable lesions, however, even in palpable lesions, image-guided biopsy should be performed as it improves the accuracy of diagnosis. Image-guided breast interventions have progressed well beyond biopsy, making the radiologist an important part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Preoperative localization of nonpalpable abnormalities guides optimal surgical excision to obtain negative margins without sacrificing the normal tissue. Ablative procedures for breast cancer treatment such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation can sometimes replace surgery in older patients with comorbidities. This article enumerates and describes the expanding spectrum of image-guided interventions performed by breast radiologist.

Ablation Techniques in Cancer Pain

Painful bone metastases are a frequently encountered problem in oncology practice. The skeletal system is the third most common site of metastatic disease and up to 85% of patients with breast, prostate, and lung cancer may develop bone metastases during the course of their disease.

Current Overview of Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease

The number of patients with bone metastasis increases as medical management and surgery improve the overall survival of patients with cancer. Bone metastasis can cause skeletal complications, including bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord or nerve root compression, and hypercalcemia. Before initiation of treatment for bone metastasis, it is important to exclude primary bone malignancy, which would require a completely different therapeutic approach. It is essential to select surgical methods considering the patient’s prognosis, quality of life, postoperative function, and risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, bone metastasis treatment requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including radiologists, oncologists, and orthopedic surgeons. Recently, many novel palliative treatment options have emerged for bone metastases, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiopharmaceuticals, vertebroplasty, minimally invasive spine stabilization with percutaneous pedicle screws, acetabuloplasty, embolization, thermal ablation techniques, electrochemotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. These techniques are beneficial for patients who may not benefit from surgery or radiotherapy.

Temperature Monitoring in Hyperthermia Treatments of Bone Tumors: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges

Bone metastases and osteoid osteoma (OO) have a high incidence in patients facing primary lesions in many organs. Radiotherapy has long been the standard choice for these patients, performed as stand-alone or in conjunction with surgery. However, the needs of these patients have never been fully met, especially in the ones with low life expectancy, where treatments devoted to pain reduction are pivotal. New techniques as hyperthermia treatments (HTs) are emerging to reduce the associated pain of bone metastases and OO. Temperature monitoring during HTs may significantly improve the clinical outcomes since the amount of thermal injury depends on the tissue temperature and the exposure time. This is particularly relevant in bone tumors due to the adjacent vulnerable structures (e.g., spinal cord and nerve roots). In this Review, we focus on the potential of temperature monitoring on HT of bone cancer. Preclinical and clinical studies have been proposed and are underway to investigate the use of different thermometric techniques in this scenario. We review these studies, the principle of work of the thermometric techniques used in HTs, their strengths, weaknesses, and pitfalls, as well as the strategies and the potential of improving the HTs outcomes.

Radiofrequency ablation may improve the beneficial results of vertebroplasty for vertebral hemangiomas: analysis of 46 patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of vertebroplasty (VP) alone or combined therapy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with vertebroplasty on pain relief with visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in vertebral hemangiomas.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with hemangiomas were evaluated retrospectively: 20 males and 26 females were included. In group 1 (n = 25) only VP was performed, while RFA+VP were performed in the same treatment session in group 2 (n = 21). Radiological diagnosis was performed with X-ray, CT-scan and MRI images in all patients. The intensity of pain was assessed with the VAS together with the assesment of life quality with the ODI. The assesments were performed before, at first day, at first month and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between mean preprocedural VAS and ODI scores, but a significant decrease was seen in postprocedural VAS and ODI scores between group 1 and 2, when compared with the preprocedural values. Although lack of a statistically significant difference in long term results, mean VAS score was 3.7 for group 1, while it was 1.8 for group 2, and the mean ODI score was 38 for group 1, and 22.48 for group 2 at 6th month assesment.

DISCUSSION

Although minimally invasive percutaneous techniques are indicated as other modalities are ineffective or contraindicated, combining RFA with vertebral augmentation provide prevention of mechanical loading pain, and prevention of somatic pain in patients with spinal hemangiomas.

Musculoskeletal Oncologic Interventions: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology and Society of Interventional Oncology Research Consensus Panel

Musculoskeletal interventions are increasingly used with palliative and curative intent in the multidisciplinary treatment of oncology patients with bone and soft-tissue tumors. There is an unmet need for high-quality evidence to guide broader application and adoption of minimally invasive interventional technologies to treat these patients. Therefore, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation and the Society of Interventional Oncology collaborated to convene a research consensus panel to prioritize a research agenda addressing the gaps in the current evidence. This article summarizes the panel's proceedings and recommendations for future basic science and clinical investigation to chart the course for interventional oncology within the musculoskeletal system. Key questions that emerged addressed the effectiveness of ablation within specific patient populations, the effect of combination of ablation with radiotherapy and/or immunotherapy, and the potential of standardization of techniques, including modeling and monitoring, to improve the consistency and predictability of treatment outcomes.

Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of bone metastases: a retrospective propensity study comparing the safety profile of radio-frequency ablation and cryo-ablation

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare the safety profile of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA) of bone metastases (BM) with and without a propensity score analysis.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and April 2018, 274 consecutive patients (mean age 61.6 ± 12.1 years) with BM were treated at our Institution with RFA (53 patients; 66 BM) or CA (221 patients; 301 BM) and included in this study. Complications were assessed according to the type of ablation modality before and after applying a 1:1 propensity score method taking into account patient's demographics, BM features, procedural details and follow-up findings.

RESULTS

In the whole 9 BM (2.5%) reported major complications without significant difference between RFA (1/66; 1.5%) and CA (8/301; 2.7%; p = 1); 40 BM (10.9%) showed minor complications, which were more common with RFA (22/66; 33.3%) than with CA (18/301; 6.0%, p<.001) mainly due to post-procedural pain occurring more frequently with RFA than CA (20/66; 30.3% vs. 7/301; 2.3%, p<.001). Following 1:1 matching, similar results were obtained, since there were similar rates of major complications with RFA and CA (1/66 [1.5%] and 0/66 [0.0%], respectively; p = 1); and higher rates of minor complications with RFA compared to CA [33.3% (22/66) vs. 2/66 (3%); p<.001] due to preponderant postprocedural pain (90.9% [20/22] minor complications with RFA).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar low rates of major complications are expected with RFA and CA of BM. In the post-operative period, RFA appears more painful than CA, thus warranting for adoption of dedicated analgesic protocols for patients undergoing RFA.

The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision

Background

Bone tumors can cause severe pain and poor quality of life due to recurrence and non-achievement of complete remission after surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be considered for minimally invasive treatment of bone tumors that are difficult to radically excise. In this study, RFA was performed for bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise and did not respond to surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy due to their large sizes and/or locations. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics and survival rates of bone tumors after RFA and provide one more treatment option for the future.

Methods

There were 43 patients with bone tumors who underwent percutaneous RFA at our hospital from April 2007 to October 2017. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 31–75 years), and the median follow-up duration was 67.2 months (range, 10.2–130.5 months). Of the 43 patients, 26 were male and 17 were female. Thirty-four cases were metastatic bone tumors, 5 were chordomas, 3 were osteosarcomas, and 1 was a giant cell tumor. Pain and functional ability of the patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scoring system, respectively. Scores were recorded preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 4 weeks postoperatively. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The mean VAS score was 8.21 preoperatively. The mean VAS score at 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks postoperatively were 3.91, 3.67, 3.31, and 3.12, respectively. The mean preoperative MSTS score was 64.0% (range, 32%–87%). The mean postoperative MSTS score was 71.0% (range, 40%–90%). The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were 95.3%, 69.8%, and 30.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

As per our study findings, RFA was effective in reducing pain and improving functional ability of patients with bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise.

Radiofrequency ablation and balloon kyphoplasty for palliation of painful spinal metastases

PURPOSE

This study was designed with an aim to assess the safety and early postoperative outcomes of the combined Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) used for the treatment of painful neoplastic spinal lesions palliatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 2015 and December 2018, 60 patients (35 men and 25 women) with spinal metastases were operated using RFA and BKP at our institution. Transpedicular biopsy was performed in all cases. Patients' demographics, lesion characteristics, concurrent palliative therapies and complications were recorded. All patients were clinically (Pain score VAS 0-10) and radiologically evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Retrospective analysis of data for this cohort was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five painful spinal metastases (46 in the lumbar spine and 29 in the thoracic region) in 60 patients were operated [transpedicular RFA alone in 5 lesions, and in combination with BKP in 70 lesions (93%)]. The mean pre-procedure and post-procedure VAS for back pain was 7.2/10 and 2.7/10, respectively (p value = 0.0001). No neurological complications related to RFA were found and no cement extravasation into the spinal canal was observed. In two patients, asymptomatic leaks into the needle track, in two patients into draining veins and in one patient into the disk space were detected.

CONCLUSION

Combined RFA and BKP appears to be a safe, practical, effective and reproducible palliative treatment for painful spinal osteolytic metastasis. In carefully indicated cases, it relieves pain and maintains stability in a minimal invasive way without adding significant surgical trauma or complications.

Evolving role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of symptomatic bone metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bone metastases are responsible for considerable morbidity, which can significantly limit a patient's quality of life. This article aims to review minimally invasive, image-guided locoregional treatments for symptomatic bone metastases as an adjunct to conventional treatment modalities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conservative therapy and radiation therapy (RT) can be effective at addressing pain, however, they require time to achieve optimal efficacy and do not address the instability and progressive collapse of pathological fractures. Vertebral and pelvic augmentation with cement enhances structural stability and can prevent progressive collapse and deformity. Ablative therapies, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and photodynamic therapy (PDT), induce cellular destruction of tumor tissue. RFA and PDT can be combined with cement augmentation in a single sitting.

SUMMARY

Minimally invasive image-guided treatments can provide rapid pain relief, enhance mechanical stability, and improve quality of life. These treatments are associated with low complication rates and are suitable for frail patients. They can be used as companion procedures to conventional treatments, or function as an alternative for patients with radioresistant biologies or those with dose limitations from prior RT sessions.

Percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency ablation for spine metastatic lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to become familiar with the most common indications for imaging guided percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency ablation, to learn about different technical considerations during performance providing the current evidence. Controversies concerning products will be addressed.

METHODS

We performed a literature review excluding non-English studies and case reports. All references of the obtained articles were also evaluated for any additional information.

RESULTS

RFA achieves cytotoxicity by raising target area temperatures above 60 °C, and may be used to achieve total necrosis of lesions smaller than 3 cm in diameter, to debulk and reduce the pain associated with larger lesions, to prevent pathological fractures due to progressive osteolysis or for cavity creation aiming for targeted cement delivery in case of posterior vertebral wall breaching. Protective ancillary techniques should be used in order to increase safety and augment efficacy of RFA in the spine.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of vertebral lesions is a reproducible, successful and safe procedure. Ablation should be combined with vertebral augmentation in all cases. In order to optimize maximum efficacy a patient- and a lesion-tailored approach should both be offered focusing upon clinical and performance status along with life expectancy of the patient as well as upon lesion characteristics.

Image-guided Cryotherapy for Musculoskeletal Tumors

BACKGROUND

This article represents a review of the use of image-guided cryotherapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal tumor lesions. Cryotherapy is able to induce a lethal effect on cancer cells through direct and indirect mechanisms. In this manuscript, we combined our experience with that of other authors who have published on this topic in order to provide indications on when to use cryotherapy in musculoskeletal oncology.

DISCUSSION

Image-Guided percutaneous cryotherapy is a therapeutic method now widely accepted in the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. It can be used both for palliative treatments of metastatic bone lesions and for the curative treatment of benign bone tumors, such as osteoid osteoma or osteoblastoma. In the treatment of bone metastases, cryotherapy plays a major role in alleviating or resolving disease-related pain, but it has also been demonstrated that it can have a role in local disease control. In recent years, the use of cryotherapy has also expanded for the treatment of both benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cryotherapy can be considered a safe and effective technique in the treatment of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Cryotherapy can be considered the first option in benign tumor lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, and a valid alternative to radiofrequency ablation. In the treatment of painful bone metastases, it must be considered secondarily to other standard treatments (radiotherapy, bisphosphonate therapy, and chemotherapy) when they are no longer effective in controlling the disease or when they cannot be repeated (for example, radiotherapy).

Percutaneous thermal ablation alone or in combination with cementoplasty for renal cell carcinoma osseous metastases: Pain palliation and local tumour control

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous thermal ablation alone or in combination with cementoplasty for pain palliation and local tumour control of renal cell carcinoma osseous metastases.

METHODS

Imaging-guided thermal ablation was performed in 59 renal cell carcinoma osseous metastatic tumours in 23 patients (concomitant cementoplasty in 43 tumours) selected following multidisciplinary consultations to achieve local tumour control and pain palliation (75%, 44/59) or pain palliation alone (25%, 15/59) in this retrospective study. Tumour characteristics, procedural details and complications were documented. Pain palliation was assessed using pre- and post-procedural Numeric Rating Scale scores at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month time intervals. Pre- and post-procedural cross-sectional imaging was reviewed to assess local tumour control rates at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month post-treatment time intervals.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful and performed as pre-operatively planned. The median pre- and post-procedural Numeric Rating Scale scores were 8.0 and 3.0 (at all time intervals), respectively (P < 0.001). Local tumour control rates were 100% (40/40), 100% (36/36) and 85% (28/33) at ≥3 months, ≥6 months and ≥12 months post-procedural time intervals, respectively. There was 1 minor complication (1.7%, 1/59).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous thermal ablation alone or in combination with cementoplasty is safe and effective for pain palliation and local tumour control of renal cell carcinoma osseous metastases.

Radiofrequency Ablation for the Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastases: Outcomes from the Multicenter OsteoCool Tumor Ablation Post-Market Study (OPuS One Study) in 100 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) ablation as measured by change in worst pain score from baseline to 3 mo after RF ablation for the palliative treatment of painful bone metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients (mean age, 64.6 y) underwent RF ablation for metastatic bone disease and were followed up to 6 mo. Subjects' pain and quality of life were measured before RF ablation and postoperatively by using the Brief Pain Index and European Quality of Life questionnaires. Opioid agent use and device-, procedure-, and/or therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were treated for tumors involving the thoracolumbar spine and 13 for tumors located in the pelvis and/or sacrum. All ablations were technically successful, and 97% were followed by cementoplasty. Mean worst pain score decreased from 8.2 ± 1.7 at baseline to 3.5 ± 3.2 at 6 mo (n = 22; P < 0.0001 for all visits). Subjects experienced significant improvement for all visits in average pain (P < .0001), pain interference (P < .0001), and quality of life (P < .003). Four AEs were reported, of which 2 resulted in hospitalization for pneumonia and respiratory failure. All 30 deaths reported during the study were attributed to the underlying malignancy and not related to the study procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study show rapid (within 3 d) and statistically significant pain improvement with sustained long-term relief through 6 mo in patients treated with RF ablation for metastatic bone disease.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: a systematic review

AIM

To systematically review microwave ablation (MWA) protocols, safety, and clinical efficacy for treating bone tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science database. Data concerning patient demographics, tumor characteristics, procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven non-comparative studies (6 retrospective, 1 prospective) were included accounting for 249 patients and 306 tumors (244/306 [79.7%] metastases; 25/306 [8.2%] myelomas, and 37/306 [12.1%] osteoid osteomas [OO]). In malignant tumors, MWA power was 30-70 W (except in one spinal tumors series where a mean power of 13.3 W was used) with pooled mean ablation time of 308.3 s. With OO, MWA power was 30-60 W with mean ablation time of 90-102 s. Protective measures were very sporadically used in 5 studies. Additional osteoplasty was performed in 199/269 (74.0%) malignant tumors. Clinically significant complications were noted in 10/249 (4.0%) patients. For malignant tumors, estimated pain reduction on the numerical rating scale was 5.3/10 (95% confidence intervals [95%CI] 4.6-6.1) at 1 month; and 5.3/10 (95% CI 4.3-6.3) at the last recorded follow-up (range 20-24 weeks in 4/5 studies). For OO, at 1-month follow-up, effective pain relief was noted in 92.3-100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

MWA is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful OO and malignant bone tumors, respectively. Although MWA seems safe, further prospective studies are warranted to further assess this aspect, and to standardize MWA protocols.

KEY POINTS

• Large heterogeneity exists across literature about ablation protocols used with microwave ablation applied for the treatment of benign and malignant bone tumors. • Although microwave ablation of bone tumors appears safe, further studies are needed to assess this aspect, as current literature does not allow definitive conclusions. • Nevertheless, microwave ablation is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful osteoid osteomas and malignant bone tumors, respectively.

Comparison of post-operative pain scores and opioid use between kyphoplasty and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems combined with cement augmentation

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective chart review study aims to compare demographic information, post-operative pain scores, and opioid use following treatment with kyphoplasty alone, OsteoCool™ (Medtronic) system, and SpineSTAR ® (Merit Medicine).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, retrospective chart review of 64 patients was examined between January 2011 and December 2017. Inclusion criteria for this study comprised patients greater than 18 years old having metastatic vertebral compression fracture involving the thoracolumbar spine. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-pathologic osteoporotic compression fractures, metastasis in cervical spine, or previous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment. Age at intervention, gender, previous treatment, and nursing recorded VAS score from 0 to 10, with zero representing no pain and 10 representing worst pain were compared. Pain scores documented immediately pre- and post-operatively, as well as 7-14 days post-operatively were targeted for analysis. Post-procedure opioid intake during the first month following surgery was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic characteristics between the treatment arms were similar. Difference of square means analysis showed no statistical difference in pain scores at each time interval between the two RFA systems, or was there a statistical difference in pain scores when each RFA system was compared independently to kyphoplasty alone. Chi-squared analysis showed no statistical difference in opioid use between the treatment arms 1 month post-operatively.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates post-operative pain scores between the two novel RFA systems and kyphoplasty alone. Each system results in improved pain scores post-operatively; however, no additional benefit was seen from the addition of RFA.