Predictive and prognostic markers in human glioblastomas

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are among the most aggressive of all known human tumors. The median survival times remain in the 12- to 15-month range despite aggressive surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Through molecular and genetic profiling efforts, underlying mechanisms of resistance to these therapies are becoming better understood. The present standard of care has been shaped by the recently reported phase III study by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Cancer Institute of Canada, which found that the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiation therapy significantly improved outcome compared with radiation alone. However, careful examination of these data reveals that not all GBM patients benefited from the addition of TMZ to radiation therapy. A companion correlative study found that GBM patients with tumors with MGMT promoter methylation appeared to derive the greatest benefit from the addition of TMZ to radiation therapy. Although this finding is provocative, it should be kept in mind that this study was performed retrospectively and that prospective validation is required before MGMT methylation can be used for clinical stratification purposes. However, this study does show promise for the tailoring of future treatments according to the molecular and genetic profiles of an individual's tumor rather than using the "one-glove-fits-all" approach that is currently being followed. As more effective "smart drugs" are developed, molecular and genetic profiling will assume even greater importance in this regard.

Should concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide be used as standard therapy in patients with anaplastic glioma?

Malignant gliomas are devastating tumors associated with poor prognosis. Standard treatment has been surgery followed by radiotherapy while the role of chemotherapy has remained controversial. Concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide has recently been shown to improve survival in patients with glioblastoma. While it seems intuitive to apply this regimen to patients with anaplastic gliomas which have traditionally been considered more chemosensitive, chemotherapy has not been shown to prolong life in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Despite promising preclinical and early clinical results, there is currently not enough level 1 evidence to justify concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide as standard therapy for patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas. Further investigation is needed to better define the role of chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Trials evaluating chemoradiotherapy as well as targeted therapeutic agents are the subject of further research.

Phase 1 study of erlotinib HCl alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent malignant glioma

The purpose of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and characterize its pharmaco-kinetics and safety profile, alone and with temozolomide, with and without enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs), in patients with malignant gliomas. Patients with stable or progressive malignant primary glioma received erlotinib alone or combined with temozolomide in this dose-escalation study. In each treatment group, patients were stratified by coadministration of EIAEDs. Erlotinib was started at 100 mg orally once daily as a 28-day treatment cycle, with dose escalation by 50 mg/day up to 500 mg/day. Temozolomide was administered at 150 mg/m2 for five consecutive days every 28 days, with dose escalation up to 200 mg/m2 at the second cycle. Eightythree patients were evaluated. Rash, fatigue, and diarrhea were the most common adverse events and were generally mild to moderate. The recommended phase 2 dose of erlotinib is 200 mg/day for patients with glioblastoma multiforme who are not receiving an EIAED, 450 mg/day for those receiving temozolomide plus erlotinib with an EIAED, and at least 500 mg/day for those receiving erlotinib alone with an EIAED. Of the 57 patients evaluable for response, eight had a partial response (PR). Six of the 57 patients had a progression-free survival of longer than six months, including four patients with a PR. Coadministration of EIAEDs reduced exposure to erlotinib as compared with administration of erlotinib alone (33%-71% reduction). There was a modest pharmacokinetic interaction between erlotinib and temozolomide. The favorable tolerability profile and evidence of antitumor activity indicate that further investigation of erlotinib is warranted.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of gefitinib in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor is expressed in pediatric malignant solid tumors. We conducted a phase I trial of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in children with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gefitinib (150, 300, 400, or 500 mg/m2) was administered orally to cohorts of three to six patients once daily continuously until disease progression or significant toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during course one (day 1 through 28).

RESULTS

Of the 25 enrolled patients, 19 (median age, 15 years) were fully evaluable for toxicity and received 54 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity was rash in two patients treated with 500 mg/m2 and elevated ALT and AST in one patient treated with 400 mg/m2. The maximum-tolerated dose was 400 mg/m2/d. The most frequent non-dose-limiting toxicities were grade 1 or 2 dry skin, anemia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. One patient with Ewing's sarcoma had a partial response. Disease stabilized for 8 to > or = 60 weeks in two patients with Wilms' tumor and two with brainstem glioma (one exophytic). At 400 mg/m2, the median peak gefitinib plasma concentration was 2.2 microg/mL (range, 1.2 to 3.6 microg/mL) and occurred at a median of 2.3 hours (range, 2.0 to 8.3 hours) after drug administration. The median apparent clearance and median half-life were 14.8 L/h/m2 (range, 3.8 to 24.8 L/h/m2) and 11.7 hours (range, 5.6 to 22.8 hours), respectively. Gefitinib systemic exposures were comparable with those associated with antitumor activity in adults.

CONCLUSION

Oral gefitinib is well tolerated in children. Development of the drug in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy will be pursued.