Management of stage I testicular germ cell tumours

Clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) are highly curable neoplasms. The treatment of stage I testicular cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Standard options after radical orchiectomy for seminoma include active surveillance, radiation therapy or 1-2 cycles of carboplatin, and options for nonseminoma include active surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or 1-2 cycles of bleomycin plus etoposide plus cisplatin (BEP). All the options should be discussed with each patient and treatment choices should be made by shared decision making as virtually all patients with clinical stage I TGCT can be cured of their disease. Long-term survival of men with stage I disease is ∼99% and care must be taken to limit the long-term risks of treatment. Orchiectomy is curative in the majority of patients. The management of clinical stage I TGCT remains controversial among experts at high-volume centres throughout the world. The main controversy is whether to overtreat a substantial number of patients with stage I disease to prevent relapse, or to observe and treat only patients who experience disease relapse as adjuvant treatment and surveillance strategy both bring curative outcome. Thus, a summary of the available evidence in stage I disease and recommendations for disease management from a high-volume centre such as Indiana University might be of interest to treating clinicians.

Assessment of intravascular granulomas in testicular seminomas and their association with tumour relapse and dissemination

AIMS

First, to determine the frequency of intravascular granulomas (IVGs) in seminomas and assess for the presence of entrapped seminoma cells. Second, to identify the relationship of this unusual form of vascular space invasion with tumour relapse and/or dissemination.

METHODS

86 cases of seminoma were reviewed to identify IVGs. Immunostaining for OCT3/4 and CD68 was performed. Pathological stage, presence of conventional vascular and rete testis invasion, parenchymal granulomas and follow-up were recorded. Multivariable analysis incorporating tumour size, vascular invasion (conventional granulomas and IVGs) and rete testis invasion was performed.

RESULTS

IVGs were identified in 13 cases (13/86). CD68 confirmed histiocytes in all cases. OCT3/4 identified tumour cells in 9/13 seminomas. 27 patients had disease progression with either dissemination at presentation (n=11) or relapse (n=16). Of these 27 patients, 8 had IVG (29.6%). By comparison, 6 of 57 clinical stage 1 seminomas that did not relapse had IVG (10.53%). Multivariable analysis revealed that no single parameter was statistically significant at predicting tumour relapse and/or dissemination (size: HR 1.65; CI 0.71 to 3.82, p=0.24, rete testis invasion: HR 1.04; CI 0.48 to 2.26, p=0.92, lymphovascular space invasion/IVG: HR 1.62; CI 0.65 to 4.01, p=0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

IVGs may represent a previously unrecognised form of vascular space invasion in seminomas. Studies on larger cohorts are needed to demonstrate its clinical value.

[Seminona of stage I: strategies compared]

Testicular cancer is an infrequent disease, accounting for 1% to 2% of all malignant 
neoplasms in men. However, it represents the most common solid malignancy among men between 15 and 35 years old.
The standard initial treatment for stage I seminoma is radical inguinal orchiectomy. Since the mid-20th century, the traditional treatment after surgery had consisted in external photon beam radiotherapy directed to the para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes. Patients receiving radiotherapy achieve cause-specific survival rates approaching 100%, with virtually no relapses within the radiation portal.
At the moment, the options for the management of stage I seminoma consist of surveillance, adjuvant radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy usually done with carboplatin. Patients should be informed of all treatment options and of potential benefits and side effects of each choice.
Significant treatment-related morbidities following radiotherapy have been reported. Acute toxicities are generally mild and self-timing, but patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone had a significantly increased risk of second primary malignances (SPMs) and gonadal toxicity.
The Medical Research Council (MRC) TE10 and TE18 randomized trials have investigated the reduction of the treatment volume and total dose to decrease the risk of radiation-related side effects.
The MRC TE19 randomized trial compared radiotherapy and a single course of carboplatin AUC7. The preliminary results, reported in 2005, and also the updated results, reported in 2008 and 2011, confirm the non inferiority of single-dose carboplatin.

Management of stage I testicular seminoma over a period of 49 years

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review the treatment, toxicity, and outcomes in patients with stage I seminoma after orchidectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with stage I seminoma referred for initial treatment during the last 49 years was performed. Initial treatment approaches, toxicity, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients were seen between 1960 and 2009. Median age at diagnosis was 37 years (range: 20-72), with a median follow-up of 22.7 years (range: 1-48). All patients but 12 were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Acute toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal, with 7.6% classified as grade 2. The 10-year disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival were 97.7 and 97.6%, respectively. 8 patients (2.7%) developed a relapse and were managed with chemotherapy. 10 patients died, 6 of the disease and 4 from other causes (disease-free at time of death).

CONCLUSION

In the management of stage I seminoma, 3 treatment options are available; currently in the European Consensus, surveillance is the first choice, considering the overall comparable outcome and the low acute and late toxicity. Adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered as alternative options only if the patient declines the surveillance strategy.

Management of stage I testicular seminoma

Adjuvant treatment options for stage I seminoma include surveillance, radiation, and hemotherapy. Despite excellent results for both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, many concerns have been raised in regards to the potential long-term toxicities of these treatments. To minimize the burden of treatment, there has been a shift away from adjuvant treatments for stage I testicular seminomas toward surveillance protocols for seminoma survivors. This article reviews the evidence for all adjuvant treatment options for stage I testicular seminomas with a particular focus on surveillance.

[What's new in the treatment of seminomas?]

Pure testicular seminoma is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Its management is controversial. In stage I disease, several treatment options are considered. Those are radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy alone or active surveillance, which is becoming increasingly popular. For more advanced stages, treatment is based on chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. In this article, we review thoroughly the existing literature and recent recommendations the various treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages in different stages of the disease.

Randomized trial of carboplatin versus radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: mature results on relapse and contralateral testis cancer rates in MRC TE19/EORTC 30982 study (ISRCTN27163214)

PURPOSE

Initial results of a randomized trial comparing carboplatin with radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma found carboplatin had a noninferior relapse-free rate (RFR) and had reduced contralateral germ cell tumors (GCTs) in the short-term. Updated results with a median follow-up of 6.5 years are now reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Random assignment was between RT and one infusion of carboplatin dosed at 7 × (glomerular filtration rate + 25) on the basis of EDTA (n = 357) and 90% of this dose if determined on the basis of creatinine clearance (n = 202). The trial was powered to exclude a doubling in RFRs assuming a 96-97% 2-year RFR after radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], approximately 2.0).

RESULTS

Overall, 1,447 patients were randomly assigned in a 3-to-5 ratio (carboplatin, n = 573; RT, n = 904). RFRs at 5 years were 94.7% for carboplatin and 96.0% for RT (RT-C 90% CI, 0.7% to 3.5%; HR, 1.25; 90% CI, 0.83 to 1.89). One death as a result of seminoma (in RT arm) occurred. Patients receiving at least 99% of the 7 × AUC dose had a 5-year RFR of 96.1% (95% CI, 93.4% to 97.7%) compared with 92.6% (95% CI, 88.0% to 95.5%) in those who received lower doses (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24 to 1.07; P = .08). There was a clear reduction in the rate of contralateral GCTs (carboplatin, n = 2; RT, n = 15; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.95; P = .03), and elevated pretreatment follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (> 12 IU/L) was a strong predictor (HR, 8.57; 95% CI, 1.82 to 40.38).

CONCLUSION

These updated results confirm the noninferiority of single dose carboplatin (at 7 × AUC dose) versus RT in terms of RFR and establish a statistically significant reduction in the medium term of risk of second GCT produced by this treatment.

Management of stage I seminomatous testicular cancer: a systematic review

The treatment options available for the management of stage I seminoma consist of either a surveillance strategy or adjuvant therapy after orchidectomy. A systematic review was undertaken to identify the optimal management strategy. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, in addition to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting Proceedings, were searched for the period 1981 to May 2007. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they discussed at least one of survival, recurrence, second malignancy, cardiac toxicity, or quality of life for patients with stage I seminoma. A search update was carried out in June 2009. Fifty-four reports satisfied the eligibility criteria, including seven clinical practice guidelines, one systematic review, three randomised controlled trials focused on treatment options, 26 non-randomised studies of treatment options, and 15 non-randomised long-term toxicity studies. The existing data suggest that virtually all patients with stage I testicular seminoma are cured regardless of the post-orchidectomy management. The 5-year survival reported in all the studies identified in this systematic review was over 95%, regardless of the management strategy, including surveillance alone with no adjuvant therapy. In conclusion, to date, the optimal management of stage I seminoma remains to be defined. Surveillance seems to be the preferable option, as this strategy minimises the toxicity that might be associated with adjuvant treatment, while preserving high long-term cure rates. The currently available evidence should be presented to patients in order to select the most appropriate option for the individual.

Controversies in the management of early-stage germ cell tumors

The optimal management of clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumors remains controversial despite a cure rate of 99%. Alternatives for stage I nonseminomas include close surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and chemotherapy. For pure seminomas, the options are surveillance, chemotherapy, and radiation. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach may help in choosing a management plan.

Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma

BACKGROUND

The authors developed evidence-based guidelines for a follow-up schedule after orchiectomy for stage 1 seminoma. Required investigations, frequency of assessment, overall duration of follow-up, and management strategies were identified.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed of prospective studies in stage 1 seminoma. Studies published after 1980 were considered eligible for inclusion. Data extracted included relapse-free rates, number of patients at risk, and relapse locations. Five strategies were identified: Surveillance, Extended-Field Radiotherapy, Para-aortic Radiotherapy, and either 1 or 2 cycles of Carboplatin Chemotherapy. For each strategy, Kaplan-Meier relapse-free estimates were used to calculate weighted-mean cumulative hazards of relapse over time. These were used to calculate semiannual weighted-mean relapse hazards.

RESULTS

Seventeen prospective studies with a total of 5561 patients were identified. Actuarial data on relapse was available in 5013 (90.1%) patients, and 92.9% of all relapses had location data reported. Annual hazard rates for relapse were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based recommendations for follow-up frequency based on risk of relapse were formulated. The authors suggested 3 times per year when the risk is >5%, 2 times per year when the risk is 1% to 5%, and annually until the risk is <0.3%. Investigations should reflect location(s) at risk of relapse and include computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis for surveillance and adjuvant carboplatin, whereas for para-aortic radiotherapy, pelvic computed tomography alone is required. These recommendations offer the possibility of maximal patient convenience and optimal healthcare resource allocation without compromising disease control.

Treatment Options, Prognostic Factors and Selection of Treatment in Stage I Seminoma

Treatment options in patients with stage I seminoma include radiotherapy (RT), surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. This patient population has virtually a 100% cure rate whichever approach is taken. While adjuvant retroperitoneal RT has been the standard of care for the past 50-60 years, there is increasingly persuasive data that adjuvant RT in this setting is associated with a small but definite increased risk of second malignancy and cardiovascular death. The long-term data from surveillance series have documented the safety of this approach, and it is now accepted that a policy of surveillance is the optimal management approach. This gives a relapse rate of 15%, and most patients can be successfully salvaged with RT. Second relapse after salvage RT occurs in a small proportion of cases, and these patients are cured with chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy using carboplatin has been investigated as an alternative strategy but has not lived up to its initial promise. If used, then 2 courses of treatment should probably be given. It must be remembered that 80-85% of patients with testicular seminoma require no treatment after orchiectomy, and the long-term side effects of any adjuvant treatment approach must be carefully considered.

Late Relapses of Germ Cell Malignancies: Incidence, Management, and Prognosis

Late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs) are rare and occur, by definition, 2 years or later after successful treatment. They represent a major challenge of today's treatment of MGCTs. Because of the rarity and heterogeneity of late relapses, many aspects of their main characteristics remain obscure. We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCTs to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival. In a pooled analysis, the incidence is 1.4% and 3.2% in seminoma and nonseminoma patients, respectively. The predominant site of relapse is the retroperitoneal space in both histologic types. The initial treatment appears to be important for the risk and localization of late relapses. The treatment of late relapses should be based on a representative presalvage biopsy and includes radical surgery and salvage chemotherapy in most cases. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single-site teratoma. Diagnosis and treatment of late-relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late-relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables increasing understanding of tumor biology and the clinical course of these patients.

Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer

During the last two decades, definitive primary treatments and surveillance with definitive treatment deferred until relapse have demonstrated 98% to 99% cure rates in patients with stage I testis cancer, and these options have obtained firm positions in standard management. The development of optimal management strategies in various countries were at least partly guided by available surgical expertise in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the United States, and easy access to reference hospitals in densely populated countries in Western Europe that facilitated close surveillance programs; hence, treatment preferences differ on the two sides of the Atlantic. The success of both approaches is highly dependent on the skills of the practitioner, particularly of surgery and of scrutinized surveillance. As a result, local expertise and familiarity with a chosen modality has strengthened over the years, and investigators have been reluctant to embark on randomized trials designed to compare one modality with another. Such expertise with one particular technique, with the other approach being less familiar territory, has created controversy, because both physicians and patients seek evidence-based data coming from randomized clinical trials on which to make management decisions. Moreover, the reduced risk of relapse resulting from the use of radiotherapy or carboplatin in stage I seminoma and of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage I nonseminoma must be balanced against the potential long-term adverse effects in this population of patients with a normal life expectancy. The purpose of this review is to present the currently available data and discuss the merits and the disadvantages of the various approaches, yielding to the possible conclusion that all options appear to be equal in terms of efficacy, but that modality-associated adverse effects differ.

Radiotherapy in the management of common genitourinary malignancies

A continued role for radiation therapy in the multidisciplinary management of genitourinary malignancies seems certain. Treatment outcomes continue to improve, accompanied by diminishing rates of toxicity. With continued technologic advances in the delivery of radiation, including the use of adaptive radiotherapy, the discovery and application of novel treatment agents, and the combined efforts of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists, patients who have genitourinary malignancies have an excellent chance of cure.