[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Role of circulating-tumor DNA in the early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma as a predictive biomarker

Lung cancer is one of the most common solid malignancies. Tissue biopsy is the standard method for accurately diagnosing lung and many other malignancies over decades. However, molecular profiling of tumors leads to establishing a new horizon in the field of precision medicine, which has now entered the mainstream in clinical practice. In this context, a minimally invasive complementary method has been proposed as a liquid biopsy (LB) which is a blood-based test that is gaining popularity as it provides the opportunity to test genotypes in a unique, less invasive manner. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) captivating the Circulating-tumor DNA (Ct-DNA) are often present in the blood of lung cancer patients and are the fundamental concept behind LB. There are multiple clinical uses of Ct-DNA, including its role in prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The treatment of lung cancer has drastically evolved over time. Therefore, this review article mainly focuses on the current literature on circulating tumor DNA and its clinical implications and future goals in non-small cell lung cancer.

Molecularly targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: The evolving role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major subtype of lung cancer. Patients with NSCLC are diagnosed at a locally advanced or metastatic stage where prognosis with palliative chemotherapy is poor. The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has revolutionized cancer treatment for NSCLC by promoting the development of molecularly targeted therapies like tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This review summarizes the clinical efficacy and tolerability of EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. EGFR-TKIs have demonstrated superior response and overall survival rates compared with chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, despite the initial rapid and durable clinical responses, acquired resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs eventually develops in most cases, with disease progression observed mostly within 12 months of treatment initiation. Osimertinib, a potent third-generation TKI, irreversibly inhibits mutated EGFR alleles, including T790M. In addition to longer survival and higher response rate, osimertinib has a favorable safety profile with a lower incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events compared with other TKIs. Based on the efficacy and safety results, recently the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has included osimertinib as the "preferred first-line of treatment" in patients with metastatic EGFR mutationpositive NSCLC. Thus, osimertinib as first-line therapy for EGFRpositive patients irrespective of the T790M mutation status could be an ideal choice in the Indian setting where only 50% of patients opt for any second-line therapy after first-line failure.

Impact of the 7th TNM staging lung cancer in surgery

Accurate staging of lung cancer is very critical to determine the proper management approach of each patient and to address prognosis issues. In this manuscript, we will discuss the impact of the most recent staging categories (7th TNM staging) on the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

The potential role of bevacizumab in early stages and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Improving outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major research area considering that a significant percentage of such patients develop recurrent disease within 5 years of complete lung resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival, with an absolute improvement in 5-year overall survival of about 5% with drawbacks such as treatment toxicity. Approximately, one third of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC have locally advanced disease not amenable for surgical resection - in this setting of patients concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of therapy. However, the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC is still controversial and clinical outcomes are disappointing, and so new approaches are required to improve the clinical benefit in this setting of patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic factor implicated in tumor blood vessels formation and permeability, and tumor VEGF overexpression in patients with early stage lung cancer has been associated with worse relapse free and overall survival. Several agents have been developed that inhibit VEGF or its receptor signalling system. Bevacizumab is the first recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody binding VEGF to demonstrate clinical benefit or rather a survival prolongation in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-squamous advanced NSCLC patients. These positive results led to a large number of clinical trials to evaluate bevacizumab in combination with other targeted agents in advanced disease, and to define the role of this agent in early stage NSCLC such as the impact of bevacizumab integration in chemoradiotherapy strategy for locally advanced disease.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C as a Predictor of Early Recurrence and Poor Prognosis of Resected Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is potentially curable after completely resection, but early recurrence may influence prognosis. This study hypothesises that vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) plays a key role in predicting early recurrence and poor survival of patients with stage I NSCLC. Materials and Methods: The expression of VEGF-C was immuno-histochemically (IHC) analysed in tumour samples of primary stage I NSCLC and correlated to early recurrence (< 36 months), disease-free survival, and overall survival in all 49 patients. Results: Early recurrence was identified in 16 patients (33%), and the early recurrence rate in strong and weak VEGF-C activity was significantly different (P = 0.016). VEGF-C was also an independent risk factor in predicting early recurrence (HR = 3.98, P = 0.02). Patients with strong VEGF-C staining also had poor 3-year disease-free survival (P = 0.008) and overall survival (P = 0.007). Conclusion: Strong VEGF-C IHC staining could be a biomarker for predicting early recurrence and poor prognosis of resected stage I NSCLC, if the results of the present study are confirmed in a larger study. A more aggressive adjuvant therapy should be used in this group of patients. Key words: Early recurrence, Stage I NSCLC, Survival, VEGF-C

Use of microRNA expression levels to predict outcomes in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite undergoing curative resection, nearly a third of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) die of recurrent disease. There are no reliable clinical or molecular predictors of relapse in patients with resected stage I NSCLC. Identifying patients at risk for relapse after surgical resection is one of the important challenges today. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate hundreds of genes central to maintaining a cancer phenotype.

METHODS

In an exploratory study, we determined whether expression of six miRNAs (let-7a, miR-7, miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, and miR-221) previously reported to correlate with invasiveness or outcome in various human malignancies were associated with tumor recurrence in patients with resected stage I NSCLC. We measured expression of these miRNAs in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from both tumor and matched normal lung in a set of 46 patients with surgically resected T1 or T2 stage I NSCLC.

RESULTS

Averaged triplicate data showed that tumors which recurred had 0.14-fold lower miR-221 expression than those which did not recur (p = 0.0036). In addition, increased miR-221in tumor tissue when compared with adjacent normal appearing lung in the same patient also correlated with nonrecurrence (p = 0.0011). Parallel measurement of expression of selected downstream target genes regulated by miR-221, specifically, CDKN1B, CDKN1C, paralemmin-2, and CXCL12, showed a near significant (p = 0.0522) down-regulation of CDKN1C in tumors of patients with no recurrent disease, consistent with increased miR-221 activity in the same group.

CONCLUSION

If confirmed in prospective studies, miRNA expression in resected NSCLC could potentially identify those at high risk of relapse after surgery.

Adjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: current and future directions

The cornerstone of treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has long been surgical resection. Over the past few years, there has been a paradigm shift to provide adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC founded on large randomized clinical trials demonstrating longer overall survival with this treatment. Reassuringly, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Cancer Therapeutics Group JBR.10 trial recently reported a continued survival advantage for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after >9 years of median follow-up. In contrast, the gains from using this approach for stage IB disease are less clear, although data from an unplanned subgroup analysis suggest benefit for patients with tumors > or = 4 cm. Herein, we review the evidence supporting adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC patients before discussing key mitigating factors in providing treatment, such as stage of disease and the impact of the new seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification system. Criteria such as patient age and performance status, as well as the value of appropriate chemotherapy selection, are highlighted as measures to help guide management. The role of postoperative radiotherapy and the future landscape of early-stage NSCLC research are also explored; namely, therapeutic strategies exploiting pharmacogenomic and gene-expression profiling, in an attempt to personalize care, and the integration of novel targeted therapies into adjuvant clinical trials.

Perspectives in adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC

In 2007 the long-term outcome of lung cancer is still disappointing, with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 15%. However, small but significant improvements in survival times have been achieved in the last decade. This progress has been achieved through the improvement of surgical techniques and following the introduction of more effective anticancer agents, mainly cisplatin in combination with newer agents (vinorelbine, taxanes, gemcitabine). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IIIA disease has been clearly demonstrated. Hints of some efficacy have also emerged for stage IB, while data on active adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IA, mostly from Japanese studies with oral uracil-tegafur, need to be confirmed in non-Asian patients. Optimal chemotherapy regimens and the role of targeted agents in the adjuvant setting are currently unknown. Increasing numbers of patients must be enrolled in adjuvant trials with a design based on pharmacogenomics profiles. Therefore, efforts should be directed toward the collection of surgical specimens to define biomolecular markers to select patients who will benefit from adjuvant treatments on an individual basis.

Preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and indirect comparison meta-analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

A large number of trials have evaluated the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after resection for lung cancer, and a smaller number have evaluated preoperative chemotherapy on survival for potentially resectable lung cancer, but no direct comparison has yet been published comparing the two approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials, extracted time-to-event data using Parmar methods (when not reported), used random effects meta-analysis to evaluate overall and disease survival treatment effects and performed indirect comparison meta-analysis to obtain the relative hazards of postoperative to preoperative administration on survival.

RESULTS

Data were abstracted from 32 randomized trials involving more than 10,000 participants, with 22 trials administering postoperative and 10 trials administering preoperative chemotherapy. For overall survival, the hazard ratios were 0.80 (0.74-0.87; p < 0.001) and 0.81 (0.68-0.97; p = 0.024) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.99 (0.81-1.21; p = 0.91). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios were 0.76 (0.67-0.86; p < 0.001) and 0.79 (0.63 to 1.00; P = 0.050) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.96 (0.77-1.20; p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable lung cancer, there was no evidence of a difference in overall and disease-free survival between the timing of administration of chemotherapy (postoperative versus preoperative).

Improved compliance with adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Poor compliance has been a common feature in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC with only 48% to 69% of patients completing all planned cycles. We retrospectively evaluated compliance and toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy in the 2 years following recent reports of successful adjuvant chemotherapy trials for NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of NSCLC between May 2003 and May 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics, ECOG status, stage, pathologic subtype and type of surgery were recorded. The number of chemotherapy cycles, delays, dose reductions and change of chemotherapy were reported.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were identified. The median age was 62 years (38% stage I, 18% stage II, 30% stage III and 14% had multiple primary tumors of variable stages). Twenty percent were ECOG PS2; Only 12% had undergone pnemonectomy. Forty-one patients (82%) started cisplatin/vinorelbine (three switched to carboplatin because of nephrotoxicity, and one switched to carboplatin/paclitaxel because of fatigue and vomiting). Three patients received other cisplatin-based combinations; six received carboplatin-based treatment (one each because of advanced age and cardiac dysfunction and 4 because of preexisting neuropathy). Eighty percent completed all treatment; 40% required a dose reduction and 58% required delays in treatment. Six events of febrile neutropenia were reported in 5 patients and 5 patients required admission for toxicity. There were no toxic deaths. Multivariate analysis showed no effect of age, gender, extent of surgery or ECOG status on compliance, need for treatment modification or toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to historical trials, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for resected NSCLC is now accepted by patients and physicians with a high degree of compliance.

Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlates with disease recurrence and survival in patients with large non-small-cell lung cancer tumors

BACKGROUND

The density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in lung cancer is variable and may have an impact on disease course. We reviewed the histology of lobectomy specimens from patients with pathologic stage IA-IB non-small-cell lung cancer to determine the impact of TILs on recurrence and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred nineteen lobectomies performed between 2002 and 2005 for stage IA-IB non-small-cell lung cancer were reviewed. Patients were stratified according to tumor size. Infiltrating patterns were graded as follows: group 1 (none to mild infiltrate) or group 2 (moderate to severe infiltrate). Recurrence rates and disease-free survival were compared between groups in each tumor size cohort.

RESULTS

A higher density of TILs was associated with lower disease recurrence (60%, group 1 versus 21%, group 2, P=0.02) and improved 5-y disease-free survival (35.9%, group 1 versus 75.6%, group 2, P=0.04) in patients with tumors 5 cm or greater in diameter. There were no correlations in patients with smaller tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher degree of TILs within large node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with decreased risk of disease recurrence and improved disease-free survival. This subset of patients with tumor infiltration needs to be examined more closely with regards to outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Nearly half of all patients who undergo surgical resection of localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will develop and ultimately die of recurrent disease. The postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) meta-analysis showed adjuvant thoracic radiotherapy to have a detrimental effect on survival in this patient population. A meta-analysis of early trials of adjuvant chemotherapy by the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group showed that while chemotherapy with alkylating agents was also detrimental, chemotherapy with cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an improved hazard ratio for death (HR = 0.87), equating to a 5 percent survival benefit at 5 years. However, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Recently, results have been reported for several large Phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy which differed with respect to the stage of resected disease included, the type of chemotherapy used and the use of post-operative radiotherapy. Three trials (IALT, JBR 10, and ANITA) that utilized cisplatin-based doublets showed a significantly positive survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage II-IIIA NSCLC. The magnitude of this benefit, which was suggested to be 4-5 percent at 5 years in the meta-analysis and by the IALT study, may be as large as 8-15 percent as indicated by more recent studies with modern platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. These data indicate that medically fit patients with resected Stage II-IIIA NSCLC should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy with a modern cisplatin-based doublet.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Single-centre experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

In recent years platinum-based chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with good performance status after complete resection in stages IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although the benefit is mainly in stages II and IIIA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective trial we evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of a platinum- and taxanes-based adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected IB-IIIA NSCLC. The primary end point was relapse- free survival (RFS); principal secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and safety of the regimen. Potential predictive factors of efficacy and clinical patterns of relapse were also analysed.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to December 2006, 41 patients met the inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Median age at diagnosis was 68.1 years (CI 95% 54-72; range 45-78). Most patients were males (87.7%) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (PS) of 0-1 (87.8%), and 53.6% had adenocarcinomas. Pathological stages were as follow: 48.7% stage IB, 24.3% stage II and 26.8% stage IIIA. 75.6% of patients underwent a lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy and were treated with a combination of carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (85.36%) for 3 or 4 cycles. With a median follow-up of 18.2 months (range 5.1-46.5), 26 patients (63%) were free of disease and 32 of them were alive (78%). Median RFS was 12.1 months (CI 95% 9.8-14.9) and median OS had not been reached at the time of analysis. Patients with PS< or =1 at diagnosis had a higher RFS [p=0.051 (CI 95% 0.90-0.96)]. Toxicity was generally mild and haematologic events were the most frequent. Non-haematologic toxic effects of chemotherapy were asthenia/ anorexia (12.2%), nausea/vomiting (12.2%) and peripheral neuropathy (17%), but severe toxic effects (grade 3 or greater) were uncommon (<10%). We did not observe treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in IB-IIIA NSCLC following complete resection is feasible, well tolerated and can be delivered in most patients in the adjuvant setting. Ongoing molecular studies may have value in determining which patients will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Risk of recurrence in surgically resected stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung: histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung is the most common type of lung cancer. A better understanding of the histopathology and molecular biology of lung cancer might improve the capability to predict the outcome for any individual patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate several histopathologic and molecular markers in order to assess their prognostic value in stage I adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were enrolled in the study. Histopathologic factors and molecular markers were selected.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that necrosis, lymphatic vessel invasion, E-cadherin, p53, and Ki-67 emerged as independent prognostic factors of recurrence. When patients were grouped according to low or high risk according to the number of factors involved, the difference in disease-free survival between these groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In resected stage I adenocarcinoma, necrosis, lymphatic vessel invasion, E-cadherin, and p53 have been identified as independent predictors of disease-free survival.

Prognostic Variability in Completely Resected pN1 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

We used the Tuscan Cancer Registry archives to retrieve records of 2,896 patients with a histological diagnosis of lung tumor from January 1996 to December 2000. Of 2,410 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 767 (31.8%) underwent complete resection. The following variables were analyzed for their influence on survival in the 157 patients with pathologic N1 status: sex, age, cell type, pathologic tumor status, number and level of involved lymph nodes, tumor grade, and type of surgery. Overall 5-year survival rates were 43.9% for 417 patients with pN0 disease, 10.8% for 176 with pN2 disease, and 31.6% for those with pN1 disease. In pN1 disease, the overall 5-year survival rates for patients with hilar and non-hilar lymph node involvement were 27.4% and 39.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that pathological T status and level of N1 involvement weresignificant prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that hilar lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor. N1 lymph node status was identified as an independent prognostic factor in a combination of subgroups with different prognoses.

Tomorrow's cancer treatments today: the first 50 years of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Members of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) have been striving to improve cancer therapies for more than 50 years. The organization began in the mid 1950s as a multi-institutional collaboration between investigators at the National Cancer Institute, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, and the Children's Hospital in Buffalo New York. In 1956 the group was officially designated as the Acute Leukemia Group B (ALGB) and for most of its first decade focused largely on leukemia research. Reflecting an expansion of its research portfolio during the 1960s and 70s, the name was changed in 1976 to Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Currently, the organization has hundreds of members, including nurses, clinical research associates, statisticians, physicians, translational scientists, and an administrative staff from a nationwide network of academic and community based organizations and medical practices. Disease areas within the scope of CALGB research include hematologic malignancies, as well as breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and respiratory cancers. Modality expertise includes quality of life, medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, pathology, imaging, oncology nursing, health outcomes, geriatrics, biostatistics, data management, and an extensive array of correlative sciences. Some of the major accomplishments of CALGB investigators and the patients participating in CALGB research as critical and committed partners will be reviewed here.

Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is now accepted on the basis of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that demonstrated improved survival. Although there is strong evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in stages II and IIIA NSCLC, its utility in stage IB disease is unclear. This report provides a mature analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9633, the only RCT designed specifically for stage IB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within 4 to 8 weeks of resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed T2N0 NSCLC and had undergone lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours and carboplatin at an area under the curve dose of 6 mg/mL per minute intravenously over 45 to 60 minutes every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Three hundred-forty-four patients were randomly assigned. Median follow-up was 74 months. Groups were well-balanced with regard to demographics, histology, and extent of surgery. Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia were the predominant toxicity; there were no treatment-related deaths. Survival was not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; CI, 0.64 to 1.08; P = .12). However, exploratory analysis demonstrated a significant survival difference in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who had tumors > or = 4 cm in diameter (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.48 to 0.99; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Because a significant survival advantage was not observed across the entire cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered standard care in stage IB NSCLC. Given the magnitude of observed survival differences, CALGB 9633 was underpowered to detect small but clinically meaningful improvements. A statistically significant survival advantage for patients who had tumors > or = 4 cm supports consideration of adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin for stage IB patients who have large tumors.

Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group

PURPOSE

Several recent trials have shown a significant overall survival (OS) benefit from postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation was to identify treatment options associated with a higher benefit or groups of patients who particularly benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient data were collected and pooled from the five largest trials (4,584 patients) of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected patients that were conducted after the 1995 NSCLC meta-analysis. The interactions between patient subgroups or treatment types and chemotherapy effect on OS were analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs) and log-rank tests stratified by trial.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 5.2 years, the overall HR of death was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96; P = .005), corresponding to a 5-year absolute benefit of 5.4% from chemotherapy. There was no heterogeneity of chemotherapy effect among trials. The benefit varied with stage (test for trend, P = .04; HR for stage IA = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.06; HR for stage IB = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; HR for stage II = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; and HR for stage III = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94). The effect of chemotherapy did not vary significantly (test for interaction, P = .11) with the associated drugs, including vinorelbine (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.91), etoposide or vinca alkaloid (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.07), or other (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13). Chemotherapy effect was higher in patients with better performance status. There was no interaction between chemotherapy effect and sex, age, histology, type of surgery, planned radiotherapy, or planned total dose of cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with NSCLC.

Advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

While there have been advances in the treatment of lung cancer, they have been marginal in comparison with recent advances in the chemotherapy and molecularly targeted treatment of breast cancer, colorectal cancer and genitourinary cancer. Lung cancer is an extremely difficult disease to treat, and to obtain positive results and to develop new standard treatment. The results of clinical trial on gefitinib and erlotinib suggest that the evaluation of molecular target drugs seems to be quite difficult in unselected patient population and may be different from cytotoxic drugs. We need to find out specific molecular biomarkers for each drug. With global studies in view, it will be essential to obtain even more significant results by sophisticated clinical trials in selected patient populations and contribute to improving the treatment outcome of lung cancer patients.

A clinical model to estimate recurrence risk in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

There are no reliable markers to predict recurrence in resected Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A validated clinical model to estimate the risk of recurrence would help select patients for adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 715 patients who had a potentially curative resection for Stage I NSCLC at our institution from 1990 to 2000. Recurrence rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A model to estimate risk of recurrence was developed by combining independent risk factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the 5-year survival rates for Stages IA and IB were 66% and 55% respectively, and 5-year recurrence rates were 19% and 30%, respectively. Four factors were independently associated with tumor recurrence: tumor size >3 cm (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4), surgery other than lobectomy (HR = 2.0), nonsquamous histology (HR = 1.4), and high-grade cellular differentiation (HR = 1.4). A scoring system for recurrence was developed by assigning 2 points for each major risk factor (tumor size and surgery) and 1 point for each minor risk factor (histologic subtype and cellular grade). Scores were grouped as low (0-1), intermediate (2-3), and high (>3), yielding 5-year estimates of risk of recurrence of 14%, 27%, and 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This model, based upon readily available clinicopathologic characteristics, can estimate the risk of recurrence in Stage I NSCLC, independent of T classification. This model could be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy if validated in independent data sets.

Prognostic value of preoperative positron emission tomography in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Approximately 20 to 40% of patients with surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will develop recurrent disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is used often in staging NSCLC. We conducted this study to determine whether the preoperative maximum tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was associated with recurrence in patients with resected stage I NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for stage I NSCLC between 1999 and 2003 who had preoperative FDG-PET imaging. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on SUVmax above or below the median for the group. Recurrence rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and overall survival was analyzed as a secondary end point.

RESULTS

Of 136 patients who met inclusion criteria, 77 (57%) had T1 and 59 (43%) had T2 tumors. The median follow-up time was 46 months and 32 patients had a disease recurrence. The median SUVmax was 5.5. The 5-year estimates of recurrence rates for patients with low and high SUVmax were 14% and 37%, respectively (p = 0.002), with 5-year overall survivals of 74% and 53%, respectively (p = 0.006). In multivariate analyses based on SUVmax, T-classification, age, and histology, high SUVmax was independently associated with recurrence (p = 0.002) and mortality (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

High SUVmax (>or=5.5) on preoperative FDG-PET is an independent predictor of relapse and death in resected stage I NSCLC. Prospective trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I NSCLC and high SUVmax should be considered.

Survival prediction of stage I lung adenocarcinomas by expression of 10 genes

Adenocarcinoma is the predominant histological subtype of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world. At stage I, the tumor is cured by surgery alone in about 60% of cases. Markers are needed to stratify patients by prognostic outcomes and may help in devising more effective therapies for poor prognosis patients. To achieve this goal, we used an integrated strategy combining meta-analysis of published lung cancer microarray data with expression profiling from an experimental model. The resulting 80-gene model was tested on an independent cohort of patients using RT-PCR, resulting in a 10-gene predictive model that exhibited a prognostic accuracy of approximately 75% in stage I lung adenocarcinoma when tested on 2 additional independent cohorts. Thus, we have identified a predictive signature of limited size that can be analyzed by RT-PCR, a technology that is easy to implement in clinical laboratories.

Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline

PURPOSE

To determine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with completely resected stage IA-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Joint Expert Panel in August 2006 to review the evidence and draft recommendations for these therapies.

RESULTS

Available data support the use of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected NSCLC; however, the strength of the data and consequent recommendations vary by disease stage. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears detrimental to survival in stages IB and II, with a possible modest benefit in stage IIIA.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended for routine use in patients with stages IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease. Although there has been a statistically significant overall survival benefit seen in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling a range of people with completely resected NSCLC, results of subset analyses for patient populations with stage IB disease were not significant, and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB disease is not currently recommended for routine use. To date, very few patients with stage IA NSCLC have been enrolled onto RCTs of adjuvant therapy; adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended in these cases. Evidence from RCTs demonstrates a survival detriment for adjuvant radiotherapy with limited evidence for a reduction in local recurrence. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears detrimental to survival in stage IB and II, and may possibly confer a modest benefit in stage IIIA.

Global histone modifications predict prognosis of resected non small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Epigenetic modifications may contribute to the development and progression of cancer. We investigated whether epigenetic changes involving multiple histones influence prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used immunohistochemistry to assess histone 3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4diMe), and acetylation of histone 2A lysine 5 (H2AK5Ac), histone 2B lysine 12, histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9Ac), and histone 4 lysine 8 in resected tumor samples of 138 NSCLC patients. Data were analyzed using a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA).

RESULTS

The RPA classified the patients into seven distinct prognostic groups based on TNM stage (first node), histology, and histone modifications: H3K4diMe (< or 85% tumor cells), H3K9Ac (< or 68% tumor cells), and H2AK5Ac (< or 5% tumor cells). The seven groups were associated with significantly different disease-free (P < .0001) and overall survival (P < .0001). Interestingly, the four groups determined by stage I patients (below the first node) displayed dramatic differences in survival (median, 10 months in adenocarcinoma patients with H3K9Ac 68% v 147 months in nonadenocarcinoma patients with H3K4diMe 85%). A Cox model retained age and RPA groups as the sole independent factors significantly influencing overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic influence of epigenetic changes involving multiple histones, in particular H2A and H3, is greater in early NSCLC, and evaluation of these changes may help in selecting early-stage NSCLC patients for adjuvant treatment. Our observations provide a rationale for the use of a combination of standard chemotherapy with drugs interacting with histone modifications, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors.

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours

INTRODUCTION

The seventh edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors is due to be published early in 2009. In preparation for this, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer established its Lung Cancer Staging Project in 1998. The recommendations of this committee for changes to the T, N, and M descriptors have been published. This report contains the proposals for the new stage groupings.

METHODS

Data were contributed from 46 sources in more than 19 countries. Adequate data were available on 67,725 cases of non-small cell lung cancer treated by all modalities of care between 1990 and 2000. The recommendations for changes to the T, N, and M descriptors were incorporated into TNM subsets. Candidate stage groupings were developed on a training subset and tested in a validation subset.

RESULTS

The suggestions include additional cutoffs for tumor size, with tumors >7 cm moving from T2 to T3; reassigning the category given to additional pulmonary nodules in some locations; and reclassifying pleural effusion as an M descriptor. In addition, it is suggested that T2b N0 M0 cases be moved from stage IB to stage IIA, T2a N1 M0 cases from stage IIB to stage IIA, and T4 N0-1 M0 cases from stage IIIB to stage IIIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Such changes, if accepted, will involve a reassessment of existing treatment algorithms. However, they are based on an intensive and validated analysis of the largest database to date. The proposed changes would improve the alignment of TNM stage with prognosis and, in certain subsets, with treatment.