1
|
Hajek R, Siegel D, Orlowski RZ, Ludwig H, Palumbo A, Dimopoulos M. The role of histone deacetylase inhibitors in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 55:11-8. [PMID: 23614765 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.797084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Clinical outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved substantially since the introduction of novel agents including the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide. However, most patients with MM eventually relapse, and prognosis remains poor among patients with relapsed and/or refractory disease. Combination therapy using agents with different mechanisms of action is emerging as an attractive treatment approach in oncology to increase efficacy and/or overcome resistance to standard treatment regimens. This review discusses unmet needs in the treatment of MM and the development of histone deacetylase inhibitors as a treatment modality for MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Hajek
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minarik J, Sandecka V, Maisnar V, Gregora E, Spicka I, Starostka D, Plonkova H, Jarkovsky J, Walterova L, Wrobel M, Adamova D, Pika T, Melicharova H, Pour L, Radocha J, Pavlicek P, Straub J, Gumulec J, Bacovsky J, Adam Z, Scudla V, Hajek R. 10 years of experience with thalidomide in multiple myeloma patients: Report of the Czech Myeloma Group. Leuk Res 2013; 37:1063-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2013] [Revised: 06/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
3
|
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients. Blood 2009; 115:1343-50. [PMID: 20008302 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (len/dex) versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma. We retrospectively studied 411 newly diagnosed patients treated with len/dex (228) or thal/dex (183) at the Mayo Clinic. The differences were similar in a matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transplantation status, and dexamethasone dose. The proportions of patients achieving at least a partial response to len/dex and thal/dex were 80.3% versus 61.2%, respectively (P < .001); very good partial response rates were 34.2% and 12.0%, respectively (P < .001). Patients receiving len/dex had longer time to progression (median, 27.4 vs 17.2 months; P = .019), progression-free survival (median, 26.7 vs 17.1 months; P = .036), and overall survival (median not reached vs 57.2 months; P = .018). A similar proportion of patients in the 2 groups experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event (57.5% vs 54.6%, P = .568). Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities of len/dex were hematologic, mainly neutropenia (14.6% vs 0.6%, P < .001); the most common toxicities in thal/dex were venous thromboembolism (15.3% vs 9.2%, P = .058) and peripheral neuropathy (10.4% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Len/dex appears well-tolerated and more effective than thal/dex. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
4
|
Laubach JP, Mahindra A, Mitsiades CS, Schlossman RL, Munshi NC, Ghobrial IM, Carreau N, Hideshima T, Anderson KC, Richardson PG. The use of novel agents in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009; 23:2222-32. [PMID: 19741729 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Although outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved over the past decade, the disease remains incurable and even patients who respond well to induction therapy ultimately relapse and require additional treatment. Conventional chemotherapy and high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation (SCT) have historically been utilized in the management of relapsed MM, but in recent years the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide, as well as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, have assumed a primary role in this setting. This review focuses on the role of thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in relapsed and refractory MM, with additional discussion dedicated to emerging drugs in relapsed MM that may prove beneficial to patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Laubach
- Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The introduction of several novel and active treatments and improvements in supportive care of myeloma patients has resulted in a prolongation of the survival of these patients. However, myeloma remains an incurable disease and almost all patients will relapse. Effective management of the relapsing/refractory disease incorporates several different strategies, depending on prior treatments, responses, and duration of responses, as well as residual toxicity, age, and physical condition. High-dose dexamethasone still has a role in the management of disease complications such as cytopenias, renal impairment, or spinal cord compression until another agent is added. High-dose therapy may be considered for selected patients who have a long-term treatment-free interval after their first transplantation. Allogeneic transplantation is limited to selected young patients, preferably with an HLA-matched donor. However, the backbone of current strategies for the management of relapsed/refractory myeloma includes the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide. These agents, either with dexamethasone or in combination with chemotherapy, have shown significant activity both in relapsed and in refractory patients. Based on the results of phase III trials, lenalidomide and bortezomib have increased the post-relapse survival and are active in patients who have received prior novel agents; lenalidomide is active in thalidomide-pretreated or bortezomib-pretreated patients and bortezomib alone or in combination with chemotherapy is active in thalidomide/lenalidomide-pretreated patients. Combinations of novel agents show synergistic activity and may overcome drug resistance. Finally, special consideration is needed for the management of patients with renal impairment or other poor prognostic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens School of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Offidani M, Corvatta L, Polloni C, Piersantelli MN, Gentili S, Galieni P, Visani G, Alesiani F, Catarini M, Brunori M, Samori A, Burattini M, Centurioni R, Ferranti M, Giuliodori L, Candela M, Mele A, Marconi M, Leoni P. Thalidomide-dexamethasoneversusInterferon-alpha-dexamethasone as maintenance treatment after ThaDD induction for multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised study. Br J Haematol 2009; 144:653-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07495.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
7
|
Historical perspective and advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Oncol Rev 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/s12156-008-0082-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
8
|
García Quetglas E, Azanza Perea JR, Lecumberri Villamediana R. [New therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses]. Med Clin (Barc) 2008; 130:626-35. [PMID: 18482531 DOI: 10.1157/13120342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the present article is the review of the most important therapeutic innovations in the treatment of multiple myeloma in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Besides autologous transplant with peripheral-blood stem-cell, thalidomide establishes as one of the most powerful therapeutic tools in induction and maintenance treatment and together with lenalidomide and bortezomib as therapy for relapsing/refractory multiple myeloma. Considering, the last named situation thalidomide can be an adequate therapeutical option in combination with dexamethasone. Under a strictly pharmacoeconomic point of view, lenalidomide and bortezomib seem to be additional alternatives in patients previously treated with thalidomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio García Quetglas
- Servicio de Farmacología Clínica, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra. España.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Thalidomide--either alone or in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy--has shown significant activity in relapsed/refractory disease. When used in the induction regimens in untreated patients, it significantly increases the response rates as well progression-free survival. Moreover, thalidomide as a maintenance therapy has become a very attractive option. However, the toxicity profile of the drug, mainly neurotoxicity and thrombotic events, mandate careful monitoring of patients treated with thalidomide, whether as the first line, in the relapsed setting, or as maintenance. In this chapter we will review the pharmacology, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of the drug, and will focus on available data from clinical experience and randomized trials of thalidomide in the different settings of multiple myeloma: refractory/relapsed disease, upfront treatment in patients who are eligible for high-dose therapy as well as those who are not, and finally the use of thalidomide as a maintenance treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens 115 28, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
The place of thalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Oncol Rev 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/s12156-008-0025-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
11
|
Abstract
Thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide have recently changed the treatment paradigm of myeloma. In young, newly diagnosed patients, the combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone has been widely used as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In 2 randomized studies, consolidation or maintenance with low-dose thalidomide has extended both progression-free and overall survival in patients who underwent ASCT at diagnosis. In elderly, newly diagnosed patients, 3 independent randomized studies have reported that the oral combination of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide (MPT) is better than the standard melphalan and prednisone (MP). These studies have shown better progression-free survival, and 2 have shown improved overall survival for patients assigned to MPT. In refractory-relapsed disease, combinations including thalidomide with dexamethasone, melphalan, doxorubicin, or cyclophosphamide have been extensively investigated. The risks of side effects are greater when thalidomide is used in combination with other drugs. Thromboembolism and peripheral neuropathy are the major concern. The introduction of anticoagulant prophylaxis has reduced the rate of thromboembolism to less than 10%. Immediate thalidomide dose reduction or discontinuation when paresthesia is complicated by pain or motor deficit has decreased the severity of neuropathy. Future studies will define the most effective or the best sequence of combinations which could improve life expectancy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Studies of bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have shown promising clinical activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib alone and in combination with other agents is associated with high response rates, consistently high rates of complete response, and a predictable and manageable profile of adverse events. Thalidomide-based regimens have also shown substantial clinical activity. The accumulating experience from ongoing trials of bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone combinations in patients who have relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed MM will provide critical information that will determine the possible role of this combination as the basic backbone for combination regimens for management of advanced MM.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The advent of new therapies for multiple myeloma brings new hope for patients but also new side effects. Emerging information about the risks of supportive care therapies, including long-term, high-intensity bisphosphonate use and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, is examined. As the number of drugs in the myeloma armamentarium grows, so does the list of possible side effects and interactions. With current progress, not only are there more complications to consider but patients are also living longer and the risk for delayed complications is becoming more relevant. The author provides perspective about the risks for the most active and commonly used single-agent and combination myeloma therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Dispenzieri
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fonseca R, Stewart AK. Targeted therapeutics for multiple myeloma: The arrival of a risk-stratified approach. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6:802-10. [PMID: 17363477 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematologic malignancy characterized by frequent early responses, inevitably followed by treatment relapse. Until recently, few effective therapies existed. Indeed, the use of alkylating agents and corticosteroids had remained the treatment of choice for almost four decades. Several novel agents for MM have now become available, including the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide, as well as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Each of these agents is undergoing extensive clinical evaluation in combination with other therapies to produce unprecedented response rates in newly diagnosed and relapsed MM. Nevertheless, relapse remains universal and further therapeutics with broad activity are required. Importantly, it has become clear that pivotal genetic events are the primary harbingers of clinical outcome and novel targeted therapy approaches using existing approved drugs or novel agents, which address that disrupted signaling pathways are now in various stages of clinical testing. It seems increasingly likely that novel drug combinations, which together turn off these critical Achilles heels, will become the standard of care and that treatment will become increasingly personalized and guided by genetic testing and prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Fonseca
- Mayo Clinic, 13208 East Shea Boulevard, Collaborative Research Building 3-006, Scottsdale, AZ 85259-5494, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM), a plasma cell malignancy, is a disorder of the elderly with an increasing prevalence as the average life expectancy increases. Survival remains unacceptably low in elderly patients with MM, in whom the gold standard of treatment has been, until recently, oral melphalan and prednisolone, which induces a response rate of approximately 50% and overall survival of <3 years. In the last 15 years, traditional treatment paradigms for elderly patients with MM have been challenged not only as a result of the change in what we define as 'elderly' but also as a result of the reduced morbidity and treatment-related mortality associated with high-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and the emergence of novel therapies including thalidomide, its immunomodulator drug derivative lenalidomide and the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. In this review, we examine currently available data regarding the treatment of MM in the elderly population. Recent years have seen a paradigm shift in the standard of care of elderly patients with MM from oral melphalan and prednisolone to approaches including HDT with ASCT using intermediate-dose melphalan in selected elderly patients, and the evaluation of and incorporation of drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Importantly, we now have been able to change the traditional goal of palliation in the elderly group of patients to a more ambitious objective of achieving a complete response or a near complete response, in the hope that this will translate into improved progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Quach
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|