Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21

The association of EGFR amplification with aberrant exon 20 insertion report using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2

Determining the exact type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutation in lung cancer has become important. We found that not all ex20ins mutations reported by cobas EGFR test v2 could be validated by Sanger sequencing even using surgical specimens with high tumor contents. This study aimed to validate the ex20ins results reported by the cobas test and to determine whether there were clinicopathological factors associated with aberrant cobas ex20ins report. In total, 123 cobas-reported cases with ex20ins were retrospectively collected and validated by Sanger sequencing and Idylla assay. Clinicopathological features between ex20ins cobas+/Sanger+ group (n = 71) and cobas+/Sanger- group (n = 52) were compared. The Idylla assay detected ex20ins in 82.6% of cobas+/Sanger+ cases but only in 4.9% of cobas+/Sanger- cases. The cobas+/Sanger- group was significantly associated with higher tumor contents, poorly differentiated patterns, tumor necrosis, and a lower internal control cycle threshold value reported by the Idylla which suggesting the presence of increased EGFR gene copy numbers. EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the majority of cobas+/Sanger- group had EGFR high copy number gain (16%) or amplification (76%) according to the Colorado criteria. Among cases reported to have concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas, the classic EGFR mutations were all detected by Sanger sequencing and Idylla, while the ex20ins mutations were undetected by Sanger sequencing (0%) or rarely reported by Idylla assay (3%). FISH revealed high EGFR copy number gain (17.9%) and amplification (79.5%) in cases reported having concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas. This study demonstrated an unusually high frequency of EGFR amplification in cases with aberrant cobas ex20ins report which could not be validated by Sanger sequencing or Idylla assay. Ex20ins reported by the cobas test should be validated using other methods especially those reported having concomitant ex20ins and classic EGFR mutations.

FOCUS4 biomarker laboratories: from the benefits to the practical and logistical issues faced during 6 years of centralised testing

AIMS

FOCUS4 was a phase II/III umbrella trial, recruiting patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, between 2014 and 2020. Molecular profiling of patients' formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour blocks was undertaken at two centralised biomarker laboratories (Leeds and Cardiff), and the results fed directly to the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, and used for subsequent randomisation. Here the laboratories discuss their experiences.

METHODS

Following successful tumour content assessment, blocks were sectioned for DNA extraction and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Pyrosequencing was initially used to determine tumour mutation status (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA), then from 2018 onwards, next-generation sequencing was employed to allow the inclusion of TP53. Protein expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and pTEN was determined by IHC. An interlaboratory comparison programme was initiated, allowing sample exchanges, to ensure continued assay robustness.

RESULTS

1291 tumour samples were successfully analysed. Assay failure rates were very low; 1.9%-3.3% for DNA sequencing and 0.9%-1.3% for IHC. Concordance rates of >98% were seen for the interlaboratory comparisons, where a result was obtained by both laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

Practical and logistical problems were identified, including poor sample quality and difficulties with sample anonymisation. The often last-minute receipt of a sample for testing and a lack of integration with National Health Service mutation analysis services were challenging. The laboratories benefitted from both pretrial validations and interlaboratory comparisons, resulting in robust assay development and provided confidence during the implementation of new sequencing technologies. We conclude that our centralised approach to biomarker testing in FOCUS4 was effective and successful.

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

BACKGROUND

KRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS "undruggability", and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.

RESULTS

In the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician's choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

Prognostic Impact of EGFR Amplification and Visceral Pleural Invasion in Early Stage Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinomas Patients after Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor

Over the last few decades, an increasing amount of information has been accumulated on biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite these advances, most biomarkers have been identified in the adenocarcinoma histological subtype (AC). However, the application of molecular-targeted therapies in the prognosis and treatment of SCC in the clinical setting is very limited, becoming one of the main focus areas in research. Here, we prospectively analyzed the frequency of numerical/structural abnormalities of chromosomes 5, 7, 8, 9, 13 and 22 with FISH in 48 pulmonary SCC patients. From a total of 12 probes, only abnormalities of the 7p12 and 22q12 chromosomal regions were identified as unique genetic variables associated with the prognosis of the disease. The study for these two chromosomal regions was extended to 108 patients with SCC. Overall, chromosome losses were observed more frequently than chromosome gains, i.e., 61% versus 19% of all the chromosome abnormalities detected. The highest levels of genetic amplification were detected for the 5p15.2, 7p12, 8q24 and 22q11 chromosome bands, of which several genes are potentially involved in the pathogenesis of SCC, among others, include the EGFR gene at chromosome 7p12. Patients who displayed EGFR amplification (n = 13; 12%) were mostly older than 65 years (p = 0.07) and exclusively patients in early T-primary tumor stage (pT1−pT2; p = 0.03) with a significantly shortened overall survival (OS) (p ≤ 0.001). Regarding prognosis, the clinical, biological, and histopathologic characteristics of the disease that displayed a significant adverse influence on OS in the univariate analysis included patients older than 65 years (p = 0.02), the presence of lymph node involvement (p = 0.005), metastasis (p = 0.01) and, visceral pleural invasion (VPI) at diagnosis (p = 0.04). EGFR amplification also conferred an adverse impact on patient OS in the whole series (p = 0.02) and especially in patients in early stages (pT1−pT2; p = 0.01). A multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors for OS showed that the most informative combination of independent variables to predict an adverse outcome was the presence of VPI and/or EGFR amplification (p < 0.001). Based on these two variables, a scoring system was built to stratify patients into low- (no adverse features: score 0; n = 69), intermediate- (one adverse feature: score 1; n = 29) and high-risk (two adverse features: score 2; n = 5) groups, with significantly different (p = 0.001) OS rates at 50 months, which were as following: 32%, 28% and 0%, respectively. In the present study, we show that the presence of a high level of 7p12 (EGFR) amplification, exclusively detected in early stage SCC (pT1−pT2), is an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. The identification of the EGFR gene copy number using FISH techniques may provide a more accurate diagnosis of high-risk populations after the complete resection of the primary tumor. When combined with VPI, three groups of pulmonary SCC were clearly identified that show the extent of the disease. This is of such importance that further prospective studies are necessary in larger series of SCC patients to be classified at the time of diagnosis. This could be achieved with the combined assessment of 7p12 amplification and VPI in primary tumor samples.

Age Effects Aggressive Behavior: RNA-Seq Analysis in Cattle with Implications for Studying Neoteny Under Domestication

The reactive type of aggression is regulated mostly by the brain's prefrontal cortex; however, the molecular changes underlying aggressiveness in adults have not been fully characterized. We used an RNA-seq approach to investigate differential gene expression in the prefrontal cortex of bovines from the aggressive Lidia breed at different ages: young three-year old and adult four-year-old bulls. A total of 50 up and 193 down-regulated genes in the adult group were identified. Furthermore, a cross-species comparative analysis retrieved 29 genes in common with previous studies on aggressive behaviors, representing an above-chance overlap with the differentially expressed genes in adult bulls. We detected changes in the regulation of networks such as synaptogenesis, involved in maintenance and refinement of synapses, and the glutamate receptor pathway, which acts as excitatory driver in aggressive responses. The reduced reactive aggression typical of domestication has been proposed to form part of a retention of juvenile traits as adults (neoteny).

Lung cancer driven by BRAFG469V mutation is targetable by EGFR kinase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in BRAF occur in 2-4% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Combination dabrafenib/trametinib or single-agent vemurafenib is approved only for patients with cancers driven by the V600E BRAF mutation. Targeted therapy is not currently available for patients harboring non-V600 BRAF mutations.

METHODS

An LUAD patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model (PHLC12) with wild-type and non-amplified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was tested for response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). A cell line derived from this model (X12CL) was also used to evaluate drug sensitivity and to identify potential drivers by siRNA knockdown. Kinase assays were used to test direct targeting of the candidate driver by the EGFR TKIs. Structural modeling including, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and binding assays were conducted to explore the mechanism of off-target inhibition by EGFR TKIs on the model 12 driver.

RESULTS

Both PDX PHLC12 and the X12CL cell line were sensitive to multiple EGFR TKIs. The BRAF^G469V mutation was found to be the only known oncogenic mutation in this model. siRNA knockdown of BRAF, but not the EGFR, killed X12CL, confirming BRAF^G469V as the oncogenic driver. Kinase activity of the BRAF protein isolated from X12CL was inhibited by treatment with the EGFR TKIs gefitinib and osimertinib, and expression of BRAF^G469V in non-EGFR-expressing NR6 cells promoted growth in low serum, which was also sensitive to EGFR TKIs. . Structural modeling, MD simulations, and in vitro binding assays support BRAF^G469V being a direct target of the TKIs.

CONCLUSION

Clinically approved EGFR TKIs can be repurposed to treat NSCLC patients harboring the BRAF^G469V mutation.

Oncogenic KRAS blockade therapy: renewed enthusiasm and persistent challenges

Across a broad range of human cancers, gain-of-function mutations in RAS genes (HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS) lead to constitutive activity of oncoproteins responsible for tumorigenesis and cancer progression. The targeting of RAS with drugs is challenging because RAS lacks classic and tractable drug binding sites. Over the past 30 years, this perception has led to the pursuit of indirect routes for targeting RAS expression, processing, upstream regulators, or downstream effectors. After the discovery that the KRAS-G12C variant contains a druggable pocket below the switch-II loop region, it has become possible to design irreversible covalent inhibitors for the variant with improved potency, selectivity and bioavailability. Two such inhibitors, sotorasib (AMG 510) and adagrasib (MRTX849), were recently evaluated in phase I-III trials for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS-G12C mutations, heralding a new era of precision oncology. In this review, we outline the mutations and functions of KRAS in human tumors and then analyze indirect and direct approaches to shut down the oncogenic KRAS network. Specifically, we discuss the mechanistic principles, clinical features, and strategies for overcoming primary or secondary resistance to KRAS-G12C blockade.

Nucleic Acid Tests for Clinical Translation

Nucleic acids, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA), are natural biopolymers composed of nucleotides that store, transmit, and express genetic information. Overexpressed or underexpressed as well as mutated nucleic acids have been implicated in many diseases. Therefore, nucleic acid tests (NATs) are extremely important. Inspired by intracellular DNA replication and RNA transcription, in vitro NATs have been extensively developed to improve the detection specificity, sensitivity, and simplicity. The principles of NATs can be in general classified into three categories: nucleic acid hybridization, thermal-cycle or isothermal amplification, and signal amplification. Driven by pressing needs in clinical diagnosis and prevention of infectious diseases, NATs have evolved to be a rapidly advancing field. During the past ten years, an explosive increase of research interest in both basic research and clinical translation has been witnessed. In this review, we aim to provide comprehensive coverage of the progress to analyze nucleic acids, use nucleic acids as recognition probes, construct detection devices based on nucleic acids, and utilize nucleic acids in clinical diagnosis and other important fields. We also discuss the new frontiers in the field and the challenges to be addressed.

Drug-Like Small Molecule HSP27 Functional Inhibitor Sensitizes Lung Cancer Cells to Gefitinib or Cisplatin by Inducing Altered Cross-Linked Hsp27 Dimers

Relationships between heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) and cancer aggressiveness, metastasis, drug resistance, and poor patient outcomes in various cancer types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were reported, and inhibition of HSP27 expression is suggested to be a possible strategy for cancer therapy. Unlike HSP90 or HSP70, HSP27 does not have an ATP-binding pocket, and no effective HSP27 inhibitors have been identified. Previously, NSCLC cancer cells were sensitized to radiation and chemotherapy when co-treated with small molecule HSP27 functional inhibitors such as zerumbone (ZER), SW15, and J2 that can induce abnormal cross-linked HSP27 dimer. In this study, cancer inhibition effects of NA49, a chromenone compound with better solubility, longer circulation time, and less toxicity than J2, were examined in combination with anticancer drugs such as cisplatin and gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines. When the cytotoxic drug cisplatin was treated in combination with NA49 in epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) WT cell lines, sensitization was induced in an HSP27 expression-dependent manner. With gefitinib treatment, NA49 showed increased combination effects in both EGFR WT and Mut cell lines, also with HSP27 expression-dependent patterns. Moreover, NA49 induced sensitization in EGFR Mut cells with a secondary mutation of T790M when combined with gefitinib. Augmented tumor growth inhibition was shown with the combination of cisplatin or gefitinib and NA49 in nude mouse xenograft models. These results suggest the combination of HSP27 inhibitor NA49 and anticancer agents as a candidate for overcoming HSP27-mediated drug resistance in NSCLC patients.

The Prevalence and Concurrent Pathogenic Mutations of KRAS G12C in Northeast Chinese Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients

Objective

KRAS mutation is one of important driver genes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the patients with KRAS ^G12C mutations benefit from the inhibitor AMG510. However, the frequency, concurrent pathogenic mutations, and clinical characteristic of KRAS ^G12C is unknown in the NSCLC population of Northeast China.

Methods

The retrospective analysis was derived from 431 NSCLC patients in Jilin Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and June 2019. The mutation frequency and concurrent mutations of KRAS ^G12C in tumor or peripheral blood was detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

The RAS mutant rate was observed in 10.7% (46/431) of this cohort. All RAS-driver cancers are caused by mutations in the KRAS isoform, while the NRAS and HRAS isoforms were not detected. Among KRAS-mutant patients, 42 (91.3%) showed exon 2 mutation in 12 codon and 13 codon. KRAS ^G12C showed a 4.6% (20/431) mutation rate in this cohort and the highest frequency (43.5%, 20/46) in KRAS-mutant-positive patients. There was no difference between tumor tissue and plasma in terms of either KRAS or KRAS ^G12C mutation. The most frequent co-occurrence mutations with KRAS ^G12C were TP53, followed by PTEN. Furthermore, KRAS ^G12C was exclusive with STK11 mutation. KRAS ^G12C mutation was associated with age, disease stage, and smoking status (P=0.024; P=0.02; P=0.006), smoking remained an independent factor for KRAS ^G12C mutation (P=0.037), and higher mutation frequency in patients older than 60, stage I-III, or smoking in NSCLC (P=0.0151, P=0.0343, P=0.0046, respectively).

Conclusion

KRAS mutation was the only isoforms of RAS family, of these 43.5% harbored the KRAS ^G12C subtype in northeastern Chinese NSCLC patients. KRAS ^G12C is associated with age, pathological stage and smoking status, more commonly harbored TP53/PTEN mutations, and providing more genome profile for targeted therapy in local clinical practice.

Innovative Tumor Tissue Dissection Tool for Molecular Oncology Diagnostics

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most commonly used material for tumor molecular profiling, therapy selection, and prognostication. Tumor tissue enrichment by tissue dissection is highly recommended to generate quality data reproducibly for use in downstream assays, such as real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the automated tissue dissection tool AVENIO Millisect System compared with a manual dissection method using 18 FFPE tissue specimens. The study assessed performance of these two methods with paraffinized and deparaffinized sections at 5- and 10-μm thickness as well as at low (5% to 10%) and high (>50%) tumor content. In addition, compatibility with various nucleic acid and protein extraction methods was assessed. Overall, dissection by Millisect resulted in statistically significantly higher yields of nucleic acids and protein compared with manual dissection (P = 0.00524). In downstream analysis on a statistically nonpowered sample set, EGFR mutation testing by PCR led to highly concordant results, and next-generation sequencing testing yielded significantly higher allelic frequencies when tissue was dissected by Millisect compared with manual scraping, demonstrating noninferiority of the automated method. In summary, the AVENIO Millisect System may replace manual labor and support automation of FFPE tumor tissue workflows in clinical molecular laboratories with high testing volumes with adequate validation.

Long Term Survivor with Erlotinib in Metastatic Lung Cancer-Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype

Currently, data that supports the clinical benefit of agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the therapy of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histologic version of the lung cancer (LC) is insufficient. In the following report we present the case of a patient treated with erlotinib for SCC NSCLC. At the time of initiation, there were no available guidelines recommendations regarding the EGFR status in for initiation of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy for NSCLC, thus the sample was never tested for the EGFR mutational status. Not widely used in the treatment of SCC, EGFR-TKIs remain a valid therapeutic option in selected groups of patients.

Use of Gefitinib in EGFR-Amplified Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with chemotherapy-refractory solid tumors are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory solid tumors and EGFR amplification or sensitivity to an EGFR inhibitor identified through a drug-screening platform with patient-derived tumor cells (PDCs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EGFR amplification was detected by targeted sequencing. Sensitivity to an EGFR inhibitor was established in chemical screening using PDCs. Gefitinib (250 mg daily) was administered continuously in 28-day cycles until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death due to any cause. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

In total, 15 patients were assigned to the present study. The most common tumor type was glioblastoma multiforme (n = 9, 60%), followed by gastric cancer (n = 3, 20%), anal squamous cancer, rectal cancer, and sarcoma (each n = 1, 6.7%). Among 13 evaluable patients, one patient had a partial response and five had stable disease, with an ORR of 7.7% and a disease control rate of 46.1%. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-3.43). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (26.7%) and skin rash (26.7%).

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib demonstrated modest anti-tumor activity and a manageable safety profile in chemotherapy-refractory solid tumors with EGFR amplification or sensitivity to an EGFR inhibitor identified through a drug-screening platform with PDCs. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02447419.

A Randomized Phase III Study of Abemaciclib Versus Erlotinib in Patients with Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With a Detectable KRAS Mutation Who Failed Prior Platinum-Based Therapy: JUNIPER

Introduction

JUNIPER compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, with erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation.

Methods

JUNIPER was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of abemaciclib versus erlotinib in patients with stage IV NSCLC and a detectable mutation in codons 12 or 13 of the KRAS oncogene, who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 additional therapy (could include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy). Randomized patients (3:2) received either 200 mg abemaciclib twice daily or 150 mg erlotinib once daily with best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

Results

Between December 2014 and April 2017, 453 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib (N = 270) or erlotinib (N = 183). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 8.8) with abemaciclib and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5) with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968 [95% CI: 0.768, 1.219]; p = .77). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.8) with abemaciclib and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9, 2.0) with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p <.000001). ORR was 8.9% and 2.7% (p = .010), and the disease control rate was 54.4% and 31.7% (p <.001) with abemaciclib and erlotinib, respectively. Safety results reflected the known safety profiles of abemaciclib and erlotinib.

Conclusions

In this study, the primary endpoint of OS was not met; PFS and ORR were improved with manageable toxicity in the abemaciclib arm. The increases in response rates and PFS support further investigation of abemaciclib in other NSCLC subpopulations or in combination with other agents.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02152631

An Overview of Promising Biomarkers in Cancer Screening and Detection

Applications of biomarkers have been proved in oncology screening, diagnosis, predicting response to treatment as well as monitoring the progress of the disease. Considering the crucial role played by them during different disease stages, it is extremely important to evaluate, validate, and assess them to incorporate them into routine clinical care. In this review, the role of few most promising and successfully used biomarkers in cancer detection, i.e. PD-L1, E-Cadherin, TP53, Exosomes, cfDNA, EGFR, mTOR with regard to their structure, mode of action, and reports signifying their pathological significance, are addressed. Also, an overview of some successfully used biomarkers for cancer medicine has been presented. The study also summarizes biomarker-driven personalized cancer therapy i.e., approved targets and indications, as per the US FDA. The review also highlights the increasingly prominent role of biomarkers in drug development at all stages, with particular reference to clinical trials. The increasing utility of biomarkers in clinical trials is clearly evident from the trend shown, wherein ~55 percent of all oncology clinical trials in 2019 were seen to involve biomarkers, as opposed to ~ 15 percent in 2001, which clearly proves the essence and applicability of biomarkers for synergizing clinical information with tumor progression. Still, there are significant challenges in the implementation of these possibilities with strong evidence in cost-- effective manner.

Oncogenic ERBB2 aberrations and KRAS mutations cooperate to promote pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease with few therapeutic options, representing one of the great challenges in oncology. Activating KRAS mutation, occurring in >90% PDACs, is present in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions, the precursor ductal lesions of PDAC, indicating additional genetic alterations contribute to the pathogenesis of PDAC. PDAC sequencing projects identify recurrent genomic ERBB2 alterations, mutations and amplifications, in 8.5% of PDAC patients, ranking as the top hit among the 100 receptor tyrosine kinases-encoding genes. Introduction of the ERBB2 mutations encoding protein variants S310F, S423R, R678Q, Q679L, E717D, L755S, V777L and V842I into human pancreatic epithelial cells causes oncogenic transformation, increasing ERBB2 signaling, anchorage-independent cell growth and tumor xenograft growth in nude mice, demonstrating that they are activating mutations. Interestingly, in many PDACs, mutations in ERBB2 and KRAS occur together. ERBB2 activating mutants facilitate KRAS-driven oncogenic properties. Introduction of ERBB2 mutations into KRAS-mutant PDAC cells activates ERBB2 signaling, promotes tumor growth and attenuates KRAS dependency. In contrast, a CRISPR-mediated knockout (KO) of ERBB2 in ERBB2-amplified PDAC cells inhibits ERBB2 signaling, colony formation, anchorage-independent growth and tumor xenograft formation. Finally, oncogenic ERBB2 aberrations can be abrogated by treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. ERBB2 and KRAS inhibition cooperate to suppress PDAC cell growth in vitro and to promote tumor regression in nude mice, providing a rationale for testing an anti-ERBB2 drug in combination with a KRAS inhibitor in ERBB2-mutant PDAC patients that are currently untreatable.

KRAS mutation as a prognostic factor and predictive factor in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) is the most common oncogenic mutation detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of KRAS as either a prognostic factor or predictive factor (modifier of treatment effects) in NSCLC is not well established at this time. This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis synthesized the available evidence regarding the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor and/or prognostic factor of survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC. Relevant clinical trials and observational studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Meta-analyses were performed using data extracted from multivariable and univariable analyses from clinical studies to assess the empirical evidence of KRAS mutation status as a prognostic or/and predicitive factor. 43 selected studies were identified by the SLR and included in this meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not demonstrate a significant prognostic effect of mutant KRAS on overall survival (OS) (HR=1.10; 95% CI [0.88, 1.38]) or progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.03; 95% CI [0.80, 1.33]). However, when conducting meta-analyses on HRs reported in observational studies, a statistically significant negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS was observed (OS HR=1.71; 95% CI [1.07, 2.84]; PFS HR=1.18; 95% CI [1.02, 1.36]). Meta-analyses of objective response rate (ORR) in RCTs demonstrated a negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS (RR=0.38; 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]). Limited data were available to evaluate the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor. In conclusion, this research offers evidence that KRAS mutation may be a negative prognostic factor for survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, but further research is needed to address conflicting results on the importance of KRAS mutations as a predictive factor.

Identification of MMP1 as a potential gene conferring erlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer based on bioinformatics analyses

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the major type of lung cancer with high morbidity and poor prognosis. Erlotinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has been clinically applied for NSCLC treatment. Nevertheless, the erlotinib acquired resistance of NSCLC occurs inevitably in recent years.

METHODS

Through analyzing two microarray datasets, erlotinib resistant NSCLC cells microarray (GSE80344) and NSCLC tissue microarray (GSE19188), the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened via R language. DEGs were then functionally annotated by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, which up-regulated more than 2-folds in both datasets were further functionally analyzed by Oncomine, GeneMANIA, R2, Coremine, and FunRich.

RESULTS

We found that matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) may confer the erlotinib therapeutic resistance in NSCLC. MMP1 highly expressed in erlotinib-resistant cells and NSCLC tissues, and it associated with poor overall survival. In addition, MMP1 may be associated with COPS5 and be involve in an increasing transcription factors HOXA9 and PBX1 in erlotinib resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, these results demonstrated that MMP1 may play a crucial role in erlotinib resistance in NSCLC, and MMP1 could be a prognostic biomarker for erlotinib treatment.

Potential insights from population kinetic assessment of progression-free survival curves

Progression-free survival (PFS) curves follow first order kinetics on exponential decay nonlinear regression analysis (EDNLRA). Some exhibit 1-phase-decay, some have 2-phase-decay, some are convex. We digitized, performed EDNLRA and generated log-linear plots for 887 published PFS curves for incurable solid tumors treated with various systemic therapies. Proportion of curves fitting 2-phase-decay varied by therapy (p < 0.0001). For 13 therapies, >64 % of PFS curves had 2-phase-decay. This included epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in unselected lung cancer patients (some with, some without mutations), immune checkpoint inhibitors, interferon, breast cancer hormonal therapies, and selected others, suggesting 2 distinct, potentially identifiable subpopulations with differing progression rates. For 22 other therapies, <25 % of PFS curves had 2-phase-decay. Only 1 therapy was in the mid-range. Small cell lung and colon carcinomas were particularly likely to yield highly convex curves (p < 0.006), probably from discontinuation of effective therapies. PFS curve shape may yield biological and clinical insights.

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on nivolumab or pembrolizumab

Background

Although PD-1 antibodies (PD1 Ab) are the standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ansclc), most patients will progress. We compared survival outcomes for patients with ansclc who received systemic therapy (st) after progression and for those who did not. Additionally, clinical characteristics that predicted receipt of st after PD1 Ab failure were evaluated.

Methods

All patients with ansclc in British Columbia initiated on nivolumab or pembrolizumab between June 2015 and November 2017, with subsequent progression, were identified. Eligibility criteria for additional st included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status (ps) of 3 or less and survival for more than 30 days from the last PD1 Ab treatment. Post-progression survival (pps) was assessed by landmark analysis. Baseline characteristics associated with pps were identified by multivariable analysis.

Results

Of 94 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, 33 received st after progression. In 75.6%, a PD1 Ab was received as first- or second-line treatment. The most common sts were erlotinib (36.4%) and docetaxel (27.3%). No statistically significant difference in median pps was observed between patients who did and did not receive st within 30 days of their last PD1 Ab treatment (6.9 months vs. 3.6 months, log-rank p = 0.15.) In multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased pps included an ecog ps of 0 or 1 compared with 2 or 3 [hazard ratio (hr): 0.42; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.24 to 0.73; p = 0.002] and any response compared with no response to PD1 Ab (hr: 0.54; 95% ci: 0.33 to 0.90; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

In this cohort, only 35.1% of patients eligible for post-PD1 Ab therapy received st. Post-progression survival was not significantly affected by receipt of post-progression therapy. Prospective trials are needed to clarify the benefit of post-PD1 Ab treatments.

Targeting EGFR pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer- tumour heterogeniety and convergent evolution

Despite significant progress in management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pertaining to better screening procedures and amelioration of the therapeutic armamentarium with targeted therapies, prognosis remains poor. Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been of particular interest owing to favourable efficacy benefits demonstrated by monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) in various clinical settings and development of predictive biomarkers informing treatment decisions respectively. In spite of optimal patient selection based on RAS mutation status, primary and secondary resistance to monoclonal antibodies is higher than desired. Further research into predictive biomarkers is therefore essential, but has, to date, been conducted with considerable limitations. Whilst molecular heterogeneity has been demonstrated by several studies in mCRC, for incomprehensible reasons, multiple resistant genetic alterations that emerge under the selective pressure of EGFR-targeted therapies are somehow able to influence the biological and clinical behaviour of cancer cells, despite being detectable at extremely low frequencies. Intriguingly, these subclonal events largely seem to converge on RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway in patients treated with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. This review describes the clinical and biological evolution and development of EGFR targeted therapies in mCRC, the challenges in the presence of molecular complexities, the role of cell free (cf)-DNA and future strategies that could lead to further optimal discovery of clinically meaningful biomarkers and application of precision medicine.

Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells: Why Heterogeneity Matters

Unlike bulk-cell analysis, single-cell approaches have the advantage of assessing cellular heterogeneity that governs key aspects of tumor biology. Yet, their applications to circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are relatively limited, due mainly to the technical challenges resulting from extreme rarity of CTCs. Nevertheless, recent advances in microfluidics and immunoaffinity enrichment technologies along with sequencing platforms have fueled studies aiming to enrich, isolate, and sequence whole genomes of CTCs with high fidelity across various malignancies. Here, we review recent single-cell CTC (scCTC) sequencing efforts, and the integrated workflows, that have successfully characterized patient-derived CTCs. We examine how these studies uncover DNA alterations occurring at multiple molecular levels ranging from point mutations to chromosomal rearrangements from a single CTC, and discuss their cellular heterogeneity and clinical consequences. Finally, we highlight emerging strategies to address key challenges currently limiting the translation of these findings to clinical practice.

The ERBB network facilitates KRAS-driven lung tumorigenesis

KRAS is the most frequently mutated driver oncogene in human adenocarcinoma of the lung. There are presently no clinically proven strategies for treatment of KRAS-driven lung cancer. Activating mutations in KRAS are thought to confer independence from upstream signaling; however, recent data suggest that this independence may not be absolute. We show that initiation and progression of KRAS-driven lung tumors require input from ERBB family receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs): Multiple ERBB RTKs are expressed and active from the earliest stages of KRAS-driven lung tumor development, and treatment with a multi-ERBB inhibitor suppresses formation of KRAS^G12D-driven lung tumors. We present evidence that ERBB activity amplifies signaling through the core RAS pathway, supporting proliferation of KRAS-mutant tumor cells in culture and progression to invasive disease in vivo. Brief pharmacological inhibition of the ERBB network enhances the therapeutic benefit of MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibition in an autochthonous tumor setting. Our data suggest that lung cancer patients with KRAS-driven disease may benefit from inclusion of multi-ERBB inhibitors in rationally designed treatment strategies.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase 5A4 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic assay in lung cancer: A Canadian reference testing center's results in population-based reflex testing

BACKGROUND

The presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement predicts response to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was the initial reference standard to detect ALK rearrangement, but immunohistochemistry (IHC) using D5F3 has gained acceptance as an alternative diagnostic method. ALK IHC assays using other ALK antibodies have also been used as screening methods, but data supporting their utility as diagnostic tests have not been widely reported.

METHODS

Data from reflexive clinical ALK IHC test using the 5A4 clone concurrent with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing were analyzed. ALK IHC results were reported as negative (-), equivocal, or positive (+), with equivocal or positive staining validated by FISH break-apart probe testing. Treatment outcomes were reviewed for ALK IHC+ patients.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2015, 146 (2.5%) cases were reported as ALK IHC+, 188 (3.2%) were reported as equivocal, and 5624 (94.4%) were reported as ALK IHC-. Of the ALK IHC+ cases, 131/143(91.6%) were ALK FISH+. Excluding 6 cases in which FISH was inconclusive or not performed, the positive predictive value was 95.6%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. Most specimens (n = 5352 [89.6%]) were also successfully tested for EGFR. Clinical responses to ALK TKIs were noted in 49 ALK IHC+ patients, with a median progression-free survival of 9.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ALK 5A4 IHC can serve as a robust diagnostic test for ALK-rearranged lung cancer and is associated with treatment response and survival. Optimized tissue allocation resulted in high success rates of combined reflex EGFR and ALK testing.

Comparing and contrasting predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted therapy of NSCLC

The era of personalized medicine for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) began when biomarker-based evidence of molecular pathway and/or oncogene addiction of the tumour became mandatory for the allocation of specific targeted therapies. More recently, the immunotherapy revolution, specifically, the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has dramatically altered the NSCLC treatment landscape. Herein, we compare and contrast the clinical development of immunotherapy and oncogene-directed therapy for NSCLC, focusing on the role of predictive biomarkers. Immunotherapy biomarkers are fundamentally different from oncogene biomarkers in that they are continuous rather than categorical (binary), spatially and temporally variable and reliant on multiple complex interactions rather than a single, dominant determinant. The performance of predictive biomarkers for ICIs might be improved by combining different markers to reduce the assumptive risks associated with each one. Novel combinations with chemotherapy and ICIs complicate biomarker discovery but do not decrease the value of the markers identified. Perfectly predictive biomarkers of benefit from immunotherapy are unlikely to be identified, although exclusionary biomarkers of minimal benefit or an unacceptable risk of toxicity might be feasible. The clinical adoption and applicability of such biomarkers might vary depending on line of treatment, the available therapeutic alternatives and health economic considerations.

[Second- or third-line treatment with erlotinib in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer: Real-life data]

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with an EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial.

METHODS

The survival of patients with an EGFR wild-type NSCLC who received second- or third-line erlotinib treatment was assessed using real-life data that had been collected in a prospective, national, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study.

RESULTS

Data from 274 patients were analysed, 185 (68%) treated with erlotinib and 89 (32%) treated with supportive care only. The median overall survival was 4.2months (95% CI [3.5; 5.4]) with erlotinib, and 1.3months (95% CI [1.0; 1.8]) with supportive care. Survival rate at 3, 6, and 12months was 62%, 37%, and 17%, respectively, with erlotinib, versus 20%, 8%, et 3%, with exclusive supportive care. Significant predictive factors for longer overall survival were the presence of adenocarcinoma, and use of 1st line chemotherapy including either taxanes, pemetrexed or vinorelbine (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib remains a valuable therapeutic option to treat inoperable locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen in fragile patients who are not eligible for chemotherapy.

The regulation of Neuropilin 1 expression by miR-338-3p promotes non-small cell lung cancer via changes in EGFR signaling

Neuropilin 1 (NRP1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that acts as a co‐receptor for multiple extracellular ligands and typically performs growth‐promoting functions in cancer cells. Accumulating evidence indicates that NRP1 is upregulated, and may be an independent predictor of cancer relapse and poor survival, in many cancer types, including non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent evidence suggests that NRP1 affects tumour cell viability via the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Erb‐B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ErbB2) signalling pathways in venous endothelial cells and in multiple cancer cells. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the role of NRP1 in NSCLC tumourigenesis and to explore a new post‐transcriptional mechanism of NRP1 regulation via a microRNA that mediates EGFR signalling regulation in lung carcinogenesis. The results showed that miR‐338‐3p is poorly expressed and NRP1 is overexpressed in NSCLC tissues relative to their levels in adjacent noncancerous tissues. Luciferase reporter assays, quantitative real‐time reverse transcription PCR, and Western blot analyses showed that NRP1 is a direct target of miR‐338‐3p. Overexpression of miR‐338‐3p in NSCLC cell lines inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, cell migration and invasion were inhibited by miR‐338‐3p overexpression. These effects occurred via the EGF signalling pathway. Our data revealed a new post‐transcriptional mechanism by which miR‐338‐3p directly targets NRP1; this mechanism plays a role in enhancing drug sensitivity in EGFR wild‐type patients with NSCLC.

Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of 18F-icotinib for EGFR-targeted PET imaging of lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has emerged as an attracting target in the field of imaging and treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiolabeled EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) specifically targeting EGFR are deemed as promising probes for the imaging of NSCLC. This study aimed to label icotinib (one kind of EGFR-TKI) with ¹⁸F through click reaction to develop a new EGFR-targeting PET probe-¹⁸F-icotinib. ¹⁸F-icotinib was obtained in 44.81% decay-corrected yield in 100 min synthesis time with 34 GBq/μmol specific activity and >99% radiochemical purity at the end of synthesis. The identity of the product was confirmed by co-injection with ¹⁸F-icotinib and ¹⁹F-icotinib. The Log P was 1.28 ± 0.04 (n = 6). The tracer displayed excellent stability after incubation for 4 h in vitro. ¹⁸F-icotinib showed satisfying binding ability to A549 NSCLC cells, which could be inhibited by icotinib. PET imaging studies demonstrated a specific uptake of the radiotracer (0.90 ± 0.24% ID/g) in A549 tumor-bearing mice, while lower uptake was observed in heart, lung and spleen at 1.5 h post injection. Inmunohistochemical staining confirmed that the A549 tumor was EGFR-positive. Therefore, we considered that ¹⁸F-icotinib was a highly promising compound for EGFR-based tumor PET imaging.

Clinical validation of coexisting driver mutations in colorectal cancers

Mutational profiling is recommended for selecting targeted therapy and predicting prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Detection of coexisting mutations within the same pathway, which are usually mutually exclusive, raises the concern for potential laboratory errors. In this retrospective study for quality assessment of a next-generation sequencing assay, we examined BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS genes within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the PIK3CA gene within the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (mTOR) pathway in 744 CRC specimens submitted to our clinical diagnostics laboratory. Although coexistence of mutations between the MAPK and mTOR pathways was observed, it rarely occurred within the MAPK pathway. Retrospective quality assessments identified false detection of coexisting activating KRAS and NRAS mutations in 1 specimen and confirmed 2 activating KRAS mutations in 2 specimens and coexisting activating KRAS and NRAS mutations in 2 specimens, but no coexisting activating RAS and BRAF mutations. There were 15 CRCs with a kinase-impaired BRAF mutation, including 3 with a coexisting activating KRAS mutation, which may have therapeutic implications. Multiregional analysis based on different histologic features demonstrated that coexisting KRAS and NRAS mutations may be present in the same or different tumor populations and showed that invasion of adenomas by synchronous adenocarcinomas of different clonal origin may result in detection of coexisting mutations within the MAPK pathway. In this study, we proposed an operating procedure for clinical validation of unexpected coexisting mutations. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the biological significance and clinical implications of coexisting mutations within the MAPK pathway.

Clinical Validation of Coexisting Activating Mutations Within EGFR, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathways in Lung Cancers

CONTEXT.—

Mutations within the same signature transduction pathway are redundant and, therefore, most are mutually exclusive. Laboratory errors, however, may introduce unexpected coexisting mutations.

OBJECTIVE.—

To validate coexisting mutations within epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways.

DESIGN.—

In this retrospective study for quality assessment of next-generation sequencing in a clinical diagnostics setting, coexisting mutations within EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, AKT1, and PIK3CA genes were examined in 1208 non-small cell lung cancers.

RESULTS.—

EGFR mutations did not coexist with BRAF mutations, neither kinase-activated nor kinase-impaired mutations. There was a low but similar incidence (3.3%-5.1%) of PIK3CA mutations in BRAF-, EGFR-, and KRAS-mutated lung cancers and a rare incidence of coexisting KRAS and EGFR mutations detected in 1 of 1208 lung cancers (0.08%) or 1 of 226 EGFR-mutated lung cancers (0.4%). Coexisting BRAF p.V600E mutation was observed in 3 of 4 AKT1 p.E17K-mutated lung cancers. Mutational profiling of DNA reisolated from subareas with the same or different histomorphology, using an alternative assay, confirmed that coexisting mutations might present within the same (whole or subclonal) population or different populations and clarified that the so-called coexisting activating KRAS and BRAF mutations originally reported in a specimen were indeed present in separate lung nodules submitted in the same block.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The results supported that EGFR and BRAF mutations are early driver mutations in lung cancers. Guidelines from official organizations to establish standard operating procedures are warranted to validate unexpected coexisting mutations and, if clinically indicated, to determine their presence in the same or different tumor populations.

Multi-disciplinary proactive follow-up algorithm for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving afatinib

PURPOSE

Afatinib is a standard first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC. We implemented a pharmacist-led proactive follow-up algorithm to identify and manage early afatinib-related adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients treated with afatinib after implementation of the algorithm at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) from April 1, 2015 to July 31, 2016. Our in-house algorithm involved consultations in person and proactive pharmacist-led callbacks on days 5, 10, and 17. All AEs were graded and documented in real time and management based on toxicity grade was standardized. This study evaluated the impact of our algorithm on real-world AEs.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Thirty-three patients were identified and reviewed. Median follow-up was 248 days. All patients experienced at least one drug-related AE; 18.2% were grade 3/4. The most common AEs were diarrhea 87.9%, rash 81.8%, stomatitis 57.6%, and paronychia 45.5%. Median dose of afatinib was 40 mg daily; 51.5% of patients had ≥ 1 dose reduction and 6.3% discontinued afatinib due to AEs. Proactive calls by the pharmacist identified 36.5% of all drug-related AEs, 33.3% of grade 3/4 AEs, 58.1% of first drug-related AEs and identified two patients that were non-compliant. Only 3.2% of AEs were identified by an emergency room/urgent clinic visit.

CONCLUSIONS

This proactive multi-disciplinary AE management algorithm resulted in a low rate of urgent assessments and discontinuation due to toxicity while maintaining afatinib at ideal dose, thus providing a useful tool for centers prescribing afatinib.

Shikonin sensitizes wild‑type EGFR NSCLC cells to erlotinib and gefitinib therapy

As patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are resistant to treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib, potential chemosensitizers are required to potentiate wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells to erlotinib/gefitinib treatment. The present study reported that shikonin could sensitize the anticancer activity of erlotinib/gefitinib in wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells. Furthermore, shikonin could potentiate mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis induced by erlotinib/gefitinib in wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells. In addition, the present study demonstrated that shikonin could induce apoptosis by activating reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and that erlotinib/gefitinib may also induce ER stress in wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells; however, shikonin plus erlotinib/gefitinib was more effective in activating ER stress than either agent alone. This indicated that ROS-mediated ER stress may be associated with enhanced mitochondrial apoptosis induced by shikonin plus erlotinib/gefitinib. In addition, shikonin may promote the transition of cytoprotective ER stress-inducing EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor tolerance to apoptosis-promoting ER stress. Furthermore, shikonin may enhance the anti-NSCLC activity of erlotinib/gefitinib in vivo. The data of the present study indicated that shikonin may be a potential sensitizer to enhance the anti-cancer efficacy of erlotinib/gefitinib in wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells resistant to erlotinib/gefitinib treatment.

CPNE1 is a target of miR-335-5p and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor. There is therefore a strong need to identify potential molecular targets for the treatment of NSCLC. In the present study, we investigated the function of CPNE1 in the regulation of cell growth, migration and invasion.

Methods

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of CPNE1 and miR-335-5p. Western blot and immunohistochemical assays were used to investigate the levels of CPNE1 and other proteins. Flow cytometry was used to determine cell cycle stage and apoptosis. CCK-8 and clonogenic assays were used to investigate cell proliferation. Wound healing, migration and invasion assays were used to investigate the motility of cells. A lung carcinoma xenograft mouse model was used to investigate the in vivo effects of CPNE1 overexpression.

Results

We observed that knockdown of CPNE1 and increased expression of miR-335-5p inhibits cell proliferation and motility in NSCLC cells, and found that CPNE1 was a target of miR-335-5p. In addition, our data indicated that CPNE1 inhibition could improve the clinical effects of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Conclusions

The present results indicate that CPNE1 may be a promising molecular target in the treatment of NSCLC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-018-0811-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Amplification Predicts Worse Outcome in Patients With Surgically Resected Nonadenocarcinoma Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic role of amplification and increased expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in surgically resected non-adenocarcinoma of non-small cell lung cancer (NA-NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present retrospective study included 114 consecutive NA-NSCLC patients with available tumor tissue and survival data. EGFR gene copy number and protein expression were evaluated using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry in tissue microarray sections, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 114 patients, 99 (86.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma histologic features. EGFR gene amplification and high polysomy (EGFR FISH⁺) were observed in 7.9% and 31.6% of cases, respectively. Patients with EGFR FISH⁺ had significantly shorter overall survival (P = .011). A multivariate model confirmed that patients with EGFR FISH⁺ had a significantly greater risk of death than EGFR FISH^- patients after adjusting for pathologic stage, presence of pleural invasion, venous invasion, and surgical margins (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.040 to 1.782; P = .025). EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry was not associated with overall survival in the same group. Neither EGFR gene amplification nor EGFR immunohistochemistry expression was associated with relapse-free survival.

CONCLUSION

An increased EGFR gene copy number in surgically resected NA-NSCLC was associated with worse survival.

Preliminary evaluation of the potential role of β-elemene in reversing erlotinib-resistant human NSCLC A549/ER cells

β-elemene (β-ELE) is a natural compound extracted from Curcuma zedoaria Roscoe that has shown promise as a novel anticancer drug to treat malignant tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated that β-ELE can reverse the drug resistance of tumor cells. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports concerning the reversal of erlotinib resistance by β-ELE in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of β-ELE on erlotinib-resistant human NSCLC A549/ER cells in vitro and its possible mechanism of action. The sensitivity of A549/ER cells to erlotinib, the cytotoxicity of β-ELE on the growth of A549/ER cells and the effects of β-ELE on the reversal of drug resistance in A549/ER cells were determined by MTT assay. The cell apoptosis rate, cell cycle phase distribution and intracellular rhodamine 123 (Rh123) fluorescence intensity were detected by flow cytometry. The expression level of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was detected by western blotting. A549/ER cells had a stable drug-resistance to erlotinib. β-ELE inhibited the proliferation of A549/ER cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner, enhanced the sensitivity of A549/ER cells to erlotinib and reversed the drug resistance in A549/ER cells. Treatment with 15 µg/ml β-ELE combined with 10 µmol/l erlotinib caused an increased rate of cell apoptosis and G₀/G₁ phase arrest. Furthermore, β-ELE reduced the efflux of Rh123 from A549/ER cells, increased the intracellular accumulation of Rh123 and decreased the expression of P-gp. The results of the present study indicated that β-ELE could reverse drug resistance in erlotinib-resistant human NSCLC A549/ER cells in vitro through a mechanism that may involve the decreased expression of P-gp, inhibition of P-gp dependent drug efflux and the increased intracellular concentration of anticancer drugs.

NOTCH3 inactivation increases triple negative breast cancer sensitivity to gefitinib by promoting EGFR tyrosine dephosphorylation and its intracellular arrest

Notch dysregulation has been implicated in numerous tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is the breast cancer subtype with the worst clinical outcome. However, the importance of individual receptors in TNBC and their specific mechanism of action remain to be elucidated, even if recent findings suggested a specific role of activated-Notch3 in a subset of TNBCs. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in TNBCs but the use of anti-EGFR agents (including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs) has not been approved for the treatment of these patients, as clinical trials have shown disappointing results. Resistance to EGFR blockers is commonly reported. Here we show that Notch3-specific inhibition increases TNBC sensitivity to the TKI-gefitinib in TNBC-resistant cells. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that Notch3 is able to regulate the activated EGFR membrane localization into lipid rafts microdomains, as Notch3 inhibition, such as rafts depletion, induces the EGFR internalization and its intracellular arrest, without involving receptor degradation. Interestingly, these events are associated with the EGFR tyrosine dephosphorylation at Y1173 residue (but not at Y1068) by the protein tyrosine phosphatase H1 (PTPH1), thus suggesting its possible involvement in the observed Notch3-dependent TNBC sensitivity response to gefitinib. Consistent with this notion, a nuclear localization defect of phospho-EGFR is observed after combined blockade of EGFR and Notch3, which results in a decreased TNBC cell survival. Notably, we observed a significant correlation between EGFR and NOTCH3 expression levels by in silico gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis of human TNBC primary samples. Our findings strongly suggest that combined therapies of TKI-gefitinib with Notch3-specific suppression may be exploited as a drug combination advantage in TNBC treatment.

Exosome-mediated transfer of lncRNA RP11‑838N2.4 promotes erlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Currently, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as erlotinib, has become a major obstacle for improving the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic and advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While cell behavior can be modulated by long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), the roles of lncRNAs within extracellular vesicles (exosomes) are largely unknown. To this end, in this study, the involvement and regulatory functions of potential lncRNAs wrapped by exosomes during the development of chemoresistance in human NSCLC were investigated. Erlotinib-resistant cell lines were established by grafting HCC827 and HCC4006 cells into mice and which were treated with erlotinib. After one treatment course, xenografted NSCLC cells were isolated and transplanted into nude mice again followed by erlotinib treatment. This process was repeated until 4th generation xenografts were isolated and confirmed to be erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. lncRNA microarray assays followed by RT-qPCR were then performed which identified that lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 was upregulated in erlotinib-resistant cells when compared to normal NSCLC cells. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) could bind to the promoter region of lncRNA RP11-838N2.4, resulting in its silencing through the recruitment of histone deacetylase. Functional experiments demonstrated that the knockdown of lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 potently promoted erlotinib-induced cytotoxicity. Furthermore, extracellular lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 could be incorporated into exosomes and transmitted to sensitive cells, thus disseminating erlotinib resistance. Treatment-sensitive cells with exosomes containing lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 induced erlotinib resistance, while the knockdown of lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 abrogated this effect. In addition, the serum expression levels of exosomal lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 were upregulated in patients exhibiting resistance to erlotinib treatment. On the whole, exosomal lncRNA RP11-838N2.4 may serve as a therapeutic target for patients with NSCLC.

FBXW7 deletion contributes to lung tumor development and confers resistance to gefitinib therapy

Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI), is an effective treatment for non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR activating mutations, but inevitably, the clinical efficacy is impeded by the emergence of acquired resistance. The tumor suppressor gene FBXW7 modulates chemosensitivity in various human cancers. However, its role in EGFR‐TKI therapy in NSCLC has not been well studied. Here, we demonstrate that the mice with deficient Fbxw7 have greater susceptibility to urethane‐induced lung tumor development. Through analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data, we show that deletion of FBXW7 occurs in 30.9% of lung adenocarcinomas and 63.5% of lung squamous cell carcinomas, which significantly leads to decrease in FBXW7 mRNA expression. The reduction in FBXW7 mRNA level is associated with poor overall survival in lung cancer patients. FBXW7 knockdown dramatically promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion in NSCLC cells. Moreover, with silenced FBXW7, EGFR‐TKI‐sensitive cells become resistant to gefitinib, which is reversed by the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, rapamycin. Furthermore, xenograft mouse model studies show that FBXW7 knockdown enhances tumorigenesis and resistance to gefitinib. Combination of gefitinib with rapamycin treatment suppresses tumor formation of gefitinib‐resistant (GR) FBXW7‐knockdown cells. In conclusion, our findings suggest that loss of FBXW7 promotes NSCLC progression as well as gefitinib resistance and combination of gefitinib and rapamycin may provide an effective therapy for GR NSCLC.

Outcome of advanced lung cancer with central airway obstruction versus without central airway obstruction

Patients with central airway obstruction (CAO) from advanced lung cancer present with significant morbidity and are assumed to have lower survival. Hence, they are offered only palliative support. We asked if patients who have advanced lung cancer with CAO (recanalised and treated) will behave similarly to those with advanced lung cancer without CAO. This study was a retrospective review of the medical records of the patients managed for advanced lung cancer during 2010 and 2015 at our institution. 85 patients were studied. Median survival and 1-, 2- and 5-year survival were 5.8 months, 30.3%, 11.7% and 2.3% versus 9.3 months, 35.7%, 9.6% and 4.7%, respectively, in the CAO and no CAO groups (p=0.30). More patients presented with respiratory failure (15 (35%) versus none; p=0.0001) and required assisted mechanical ventilation (10 (23.3%) versus none; p=0.001) in the CAO group compared with the no CAO group. Fewer patients received chemotherapy in the CAO group (11 (25.5%)) compared with the no CAO group (23 (54.7%); p=0.008). There was no difference in survival among patients with advanced lung cancer whether they presented with CAO or without CAO. Survival was similar to those without CAO in patients with recanalised CAO despite greater morbidity and lesser use of chemotherapy, strongly advocating bronchoscopic recanalisation of CAO. These findings dispel the nihilism associated with such cases.

Erlotinib for Patients with EGFR Wild-Type Metastatic NSCLC: a Retrospective Biomarkers Analysis

Erlotinib is approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR mutation positive, metastatic NSCLC. It is also approved as second/third line therapy for EGFR mutation negative patients, but in this setting the benefit of erlotinib is modest and there is no validated biomarker for selecting EGFR wild-type patients who may benefit the most from the treatment. We retrospectively assessed EGFR and K-RAS mutational status, and EGFR, c-MET and IGF1-R expression in tumor samples of 72 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with erlotinib after at least one prior line of chemotherapy, from 2008 to 2012. We analyzed the association between biomarkers and outcome (RR, PFS, and OS). EGFR mutated patients achieved a better RR (56% vs 8%, p = .002), PFS (10 vs 3 months, HR 0.53, p = 0.48) and OS (20 vs 6 months, HR 0.55, p = .07), compared to EGFR wild-type patients. Among 63 EGFR wild-type patients, those with EGFR high-expression had a better outcome in terms of RR (40% vs 2%, p = .002), PFS (7.5 vs 2 months, HR 0.45, p = .007) and OS (30 vs 5 months, HR 0.34, p < .001) compared to patients with EGFR intermediate or low/negative-expression. IGF1-R expression, c-MET expression and K-RAS mutational status did not significantly affect the outcome; however, no patients with K-RAS mutation or c-MET high-expression achieved an objective response. In patients with metastatic, chemo-refractory EGFR wild-type NSCLC, EGFR high-expression may represent a positive predictor of activity for erlotinib, whereas K-RAS mutation and c-MET high-expression may predict lack of activity. These findings deserve further prospective evaluation.

Complex epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and their responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in previously untreated advanced lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Two or more different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can be detected within a single tumor sample, which represents complex mutations. However, the frequency and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments for patients harboring these mutations are unknown.

METHODS

From January 2011 to January 2017, patients diagnosed with EGFR mutations were screened. The effectiveness of TKIs in patients with complex mutations was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 16,840 subjects were screened, and there were 5898 positive patients. One hundred eighty-seven patients (3.2% of all patients with EGFR mutations) had complex EGFR mutations, and 51 of the patients with advanced adenocarcinoma were treated with TKIs as a first-line treatment. The objective response rates for patients who had Del-19+21L858R mutations (n = 15), Del-19/21L858R+atypical mutations (n = 16), double atypical mutations (n = 8), and complex mutations with a primary drug-resistant pattern (n = 12) were 75.0%, 60.0%, 71.0%, and 8.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival times for the 4 groups were 18.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-25.9 months), 9.7 months (95% CI, 3.3-15.8 months), 9.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-19.0 months), and 1.4 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.3 months), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results from the largest sample size suggest that EGFR-TKI therapy is effective in patients with Del-19+21L858R mutations, Del-19/21L858R+atypical mutations, and double atypical mutations but is less effective in patients with a primary drug-resistant pattern. Patients with the Del-19+21L858R mutations may, therefore, benefit more from treatment with first-generation TKIs. Cancer 2018;124:2399-406. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Targeting focal adhesion kinase overcomes erlotinib resistance in smoke induced lung cancer by altering phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor

EGFR-based targeted therapies have shown limited success in smokers. Identification of alternate signaling mechanism(s) leading to TKI resistance in smokers is critically important. We observed increased resistance to erlotinib in H358 NSCLC (non-small cell lung carcinoma) cells chronically exposed to cigarette smoke (H358-S) compared to parental cells. SILAC-based mass-spectrometry approach was used to study altered signaling in H358-S cell line. Importantly, among the top phosphosites in H358-S cells we observed hyperphosphorylation of EGFR (Y1197) and non-receptor tyrosine kinase FAK (Y576/577). Supporting these observations, a transcriptomic-based pathway activation analysis of TCGA NSCLC datasets revealed that FAK and EGFR internalization pathways were significantly upregulated in smoking patients, compared to the never-smokers and were associated with elevated PI3K signaling and lower level of caspase cascade and E-cadherin pathways activation. We show that inhibition of FAK led to decreased cellular proliferation and invasive ability of the smoke-exposed cells, and restored their dependency on EGFR signaling. Our data suggests that activation of focal adhesion pathway significantly contributes to erlotinib resistance, and that FAK is a potential therapeutic target for management of erlotinib resistance in smoke-induced NSCLC.

Randomized phase 2 study of tivantinib plus erlotinib versus single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated KRAS mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 25% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and are associated with resistance to currently available targeted therapies. The MET oncogene may be implicated in malignant progression of KRAS-mutant tumors. In a pre-specified subset analysis of KRAS mutant cancers in an earlier phase 2 study of erlotinib plus the oral MET inhibitor tivantinib, combination therapy was associated with substantial clinical benefit compared to erlotinib alone (progression-free survival [PFS] HR 0.18; P < 0.01). The current study was conducted to evaluate this combination further in KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Previously treated patients with advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC were randomized to receive either oral tivantinib (360 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (150 mg daily) (ET) or single-agent chemotherapy (investigator's choice of pemetrexed, docetaxel, or gemcitabine) (C). The primary endpoint was PFS. At progression, crossover from C to ET was permitted.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to ET (n = 51) or to C (n = 45). Median PFS was 1.7 months (mos) for ET and 4.3 mos for C (HR 1.19; 95% CI, 0.71-1.97; P = 0.50). There was no difference in overall survival (HR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.76-1.88; P = 0.44). There were 4 partial responses in the C arm, and none in the ET arm. Overall, adverse events occurred more frequently in the C arm, with more cytopenias, nausea, fatigue, and alopecia. Dermatologic toxicities were more common in the ET arm.

CONCLUSION

In previously treated patients with advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC, the combination of the MET inhibitor tivantinib and erlotinib is not superior to conventional single-agent chemotherapy.

Toward a Tiered Model to Share Clinical Trial Data and Samples in Precision Oncology

The recent revolution in science and technology applied to medical research has left in its wake a trial of biomedical data and human samples; however, its opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to a number of legal, ethical, financial, strategic, and technical barriers. Precision oncology has been at the vanguard to leverage this potential of "Big data" and samples into meaningful solutions for patients, considering the need for new drug development approaches in this area (due to high costs, late-stage failures, and the molecular diversity of cancer). To harness the potential of the vast quantities of data and samples currently fragmented across databases and biobanks, it is critical to engage all stakeholders and share data and samples across research institutes. Here, we identified two general types of sharing strategies. First, open access models, characterized by the absence of any review panel or decision maker, and second controlled access model where some form of control is exercised by either the donor (i.e., patient), the data provider (i.e., initial organization), or an independent party. Further, we theoretically describe and provide examples of nine different strategies focused on greater sharing of patient data and material. These models provide varying levels of control, access to various data and/or samples, and different types of relationship between the donor, data provider, and data requester. We propose a tiered model to share clinical data and samples that takes into account privacy issues and respects sponsors' legitimate interests. Its implementation would contribute to maximize the value of existing datasets, enabling unraveling the complexity of tumor biology, identify novel biomarkers, and re-direct treatment strategies better, ultimately to help patients with cancer.

Survival-associated factors of first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor responders and non-responders in lung adenocarcinoma patients with common EGFR mutations

The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to elucidate the clinical presentation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) responders and non-responders in lung adenocarcinoma patients with common EGFR mutations. The cohort included 131 lung adenocarcinoma patients with common exon 19 or exon 21 EGFR mutations, who were receiving first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The patient characteristics, treatment regimen and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Of the 131 patients, 104 (79.3%) responded to treatment, while 27 (20.7%) did not. A significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) [14.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 12.2-18.4 vs. 5.7, 95% CI: 2.7-9.9 months; P<0.001] and overall survival (OS) (42.2, 95% CI: 28.1-58.1 vs. 11.5, 95% CI: 8.3-19.7 months; P<0.001) were observed in responders compared with non-responders. In responders, bone [hazard ratio (HR)=1.87, 95% CI: 1.11-3.20, P=0.021] and pleural (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.37-4.22, P=0.002) metastasis were independent factors of PFS. Exon 19 mutations (HR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.76, P=0.006), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥2 (HR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.42-8.75, P=0.007) and bone metastasis (HR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.05-3.85, P=0.034), were independent factors of OS. In non-responders, smoking (HR=3.97, 95% CI: 1.13-13.91, P=0.031) was an independent factor of PFS. Different survival-associated factors were observed between EGFR-TKI responders and non-responders. The development of new treatment strategies should be advocated in EGFR-TKI non-responders.

Erlotinib

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in a multiplicity of cancer-related signal transduction pathways like cellular proliferation, adhesion, migration, neoangiogenesis and apoptosis inhibition, all of which are important features of cancerogenesis and tumour progression. Its tyrosine kinase activity plays a central role in mediating these processes and has been intensely studied to exploit it as a therapeutic target. Inhibitors of this pathway have been developed and assessed in trials with significant efficacy in clinical applications. The current review focuses in particular on the clinical data of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in different tumour entities, preferably non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer with emphasis to the approved small molecule erlotinib. Its clinical applications, evidence-based efficacy and toxicity as well as predictive markers of response are discussed.