1
|
Targeting PARP proteins in acute leukemia: DNA damage response inhibition and therapeutic strategies. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15:10. [PMID: 35065680 PMCID: PMC8783444 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01228-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The members of the Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) superfamily are involved in several biological processes and, in particular, in the DNA damage response (DDR). The most studied members, PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3, act as sensors of DNA damages, in order to activate different intracellular repair pathways, including single-strand repair, homologous recombination, conventional and alternative non-homologous end joining. This review recapitulates the functional role of PARPs in the DDR pathways, also in relationship with the cell cycle phases, which drives our knowledge of the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors (PARPi), encompassing inhibition of single-strand breaks and base excision repair, PARP trapping and sensitization to antileukemia immune responses. Several studies have demonstrated a preclinical activity of the current available PARPi, olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, veliparib and talazoparib, as single agent and/or in combination with cytotoxic, hypomethylating or targeted drugs in acute leukemia, thus encouraging the development of clinical trials. We here summarize the most recent preclinical and clinical findings and discuss the synthetic lethal interactions of PARPi in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite the low frequency of genomic alterations of PARP and other DDR-related genes in acute leukemia, selective vulnerabilities have been reported in several disease subgroups, along with a “BRCAness phenotype.” AML carrying the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or PML-RARA fusion genes or mutations in signaling genes (FLT3-ITD in combination with TET2 or TET2 and DNMT3A deficiency), cohesin complex members (STAG2), TP53 and BCOR as co-occurring lesions, IDH1/2 and ALL cases expressing the TCF3-HLF chimera or TET1 was highly sensitive to PARPi in preclinical studies. These data, along with the warning coming from the observation of cases of therapy-related myeloid malignancies among patients receiving PARPi for solid tumors treatment, indicate that PARPi represents a promising strategy in a personalized medicine setting. The characterization of the clonal and subclonal genetic background and of the DDR functionality is crucial to select acute leukemia patients that will likely benefit of PARPi-based therapeutic regimens.
Collapse
|
2
|
Garcia-Manero G, Pemmaraju N, Alvarado Y, Naqvi K, Ravandi F, Jabbour E, De Lumpa R, Kantarjian H, Advani A, Mukherjee S, Gerds A, Carraway HE, Nazha A, Iwamura H, Murase M, Bavisotto L, Kurman M, Maier G, Johansen M, Sekeres MA. Results of a Phase 1/2a dose-escalation study of FF-10501-01, an IMPDH inhibitor, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:1943-1953. [PMID: 32264726 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1747065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
FF-10501-01 potently inhibits inosine-5-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), inducing anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) human cell lines resistant to hypomethylating agents. In this Phase 1/2a study, Phase 1 enrolled 38 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (n = 28) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS/CMML, n = 10) to receive FF-10501 oral doses 50-500 mg/m2 BID for 14 or 21 days out of each 28-day cycle. Fifteen additional patients with HMA-resistant MDS/CMML (Phase 2a) were treated at 400 mg/m2 BID for 21 days. Most Phase 1 adverse events were disease-related and low-grade. 3 of 19 (16%) evaluable AML patients achieved partial remission (31, 7, and 5 months). 2 of 20 (10%) evaluable MDS/CMML patients (Phase 1 and 2a) attained marrow complete remission, one continuing treatment for 17 months. While FF-10501-01 demonstrated clinical activity and target inhibition in heavily pretreated patients with AML and MDS/CMML, increased mucositis events led to Phase 2a closure (ClinTrials.gov#NCT02193958).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Naveen Pemmaraju
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yesid Alvarado
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kiran Naqvi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farhad Ravandi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elias Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ricardo De Lumpa
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anjali Advani
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sudipto Mukherjee
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aaron Gerds
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hetty E Carraway
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aziz Nazha
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael Kurman
- FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Gary Maier
- FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Mary Johansen
- FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Mikkael A Sekeres
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Century-Long Story. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11091346. [PMID: 31514446 PMCID: PMC6770829 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The purine nucleotides ATP and GTP are essential precursors to DNA and RNA synthesis and fundamental for energy metabolism. Although de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis is increased in highly proliferating cells, such as malignant tumors, it is not clear if this is merely a secondary manifestation of increased cell proliferation. Suggestive of a direct causative effect includes evidence that, in some cancer types, the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo GTP biosynthesis, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), is upregulated and that the IMPDH inhibitor, mycophenolic acid (MPA), possesses anti-tumor activity. However, historically, enthusiasm for employing IMPDH inhibitors in cancer treatment has been mitigated by their adverse effects at high treatment doses and variable response. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanistic role of IMPDH in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, as well as the development of IMPDH inhibitors with selective actions on GTP synthesis, have prompted a reappraisal of targeting this enzyme for anti-cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the history of IMPDH inhibitors, the development of new inhibitors as anti-cancer drugs, and future directions and strategies to overcome existing challenges.
Collapse
|