1
|
Sener U, Islam M, Webb M, Kizilbash SH. Antiangiogenic exclusion rules in glioma trials: Historical perspectives and guidance for future trial design. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae039. [PMID: 38596714 PMCID: PMC11003534 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the lack of proven therapies for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG), only 8%-11% of patients with glioblastoma participate in clinical trials, partly due to stringent eligibility criteria. Prior bevacizumab treatment is a frequent exclusion criterion, due to difficulty with response assessment and concerns for rebound edema following antiangiogenic discontinuation. There are no standardized trial eligibility rules related to prior antiangiogenic use. Methods We reviewed ClinicalTrials.gov listings for glioma studies starting between May 2009 and July 2022 for eligibility rules related to antiangiogenics. We also reviewed the literature pertaining to bevacizumab withdrawal. Results Two hundred and ninety-seven studies for patients with recurrent glioma were reviewed. Most were phase 1 (n = 145, 49%), non-randomized (n = 257, 87%), evaluated a drug-only intervention (n = 223, 75%), and had a safety and tolerability primary objective (n = 181, 61%). Fifty-one (17%) excluded participants who received any antiangiogenic, one (0.3%) excluded participants who received any non-temozolomide systemic therapy. Fifty-nine (20%) outlined washout rules for bevacizumab (range 2-24 weeks, 4-week washout n = 35, 12% most common). Seventy-eight required a systemic therapy washout (range 1-6 weeks, 4-week washout n = 34, 11% most common). Nine permitted prior bevacizumab use with limitations, 18 (6%) permitted any prior bevacizumab, 5 (2%) were for bevacizumab-refractory disease, and 76 (26%) had no rules regarding antiangiogenic use. A literature review is then presented to define standardized eligibility criteria with a 6-week washout period proposed for future trial design. Conclusions Interventional clinical trials for patients with HGG have substantial heterogeneity regarding eligibility criteria pertaining to bevacizumab use, demonstrating a need for standardizing clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mahnoor Islam
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mason Webb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sani H Kizilbash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Collienne M, Neven A, Caballero C, Kataoka K, Carrion-Alvarez L, Nilsson H, Désolneux G, Rivoire M, Ruers T, Gruenberger T, Protic M, Troisi RI, Primavesi F, Staettner S, Rahbari N, Schnitzbauer A, Malik H, Swijnenburg RJ, Mauer M, Ducreux M, Evrard S. EORTC 1409 GITCG/ESSO 01 - A prospective colorectal liver metastasis database for borderline or initially unresectable diseases (CLIMB): Lessons learnt from real life. From paradigm to unmet need. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107081. [PMID: 37793303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Multidisciplinary management of metastatic colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is still challenging. To assess postoperative complications in initially unresectable or borderline resectable CRLM, the prospective EORTC-1409 ESSO 01-CLIMB trial capturing 'real-life data' of European centres specialized in liver surgery was initiated. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 219 patients were registered between May 2015 and January 2019 from 15 centres in nine countries. Eligible patients had borderline or initially unresectable CRLM assessed by pre-operative multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT). Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, 30-day and 90-days mortality post-surgery, and quality indicators. We report the final results of the 151 eligible patients that underwent at least one liver surgery. RESULTS Perioperative chemotherapy with or without targeted treatment were administered in 100 patients (69.4%). One stage resection (OSR) was performed in 119 patients (78.8%). Two stage resections (TSR, incl. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)) were completed in 24 out of 32 patients (75%). Postoperative complications were reported in 55.5% (95% CI: 46.1-64.6%), 64.0% (95% CI: 42.5-82%), and 100% (95% CI: 59-100%) of the patients in OSR, TSR and ALPPS, respectively. Post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 6.7%, 20.0%, and 28.6% in OSR, TSR, and ALPPS, respectively. In total, four patients (2.6%) died after surgery. CONCLUSION Across nine countries, OSR was more often performed than TSR and tended to result in less postoperative complications. Despite many efforts to register patients across Europe, it is still challenging to set up a prospective CRLM database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike Collienne
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Anouk Neven
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg Institute of Health, Competence Center for Methodology and Statistics, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | | | - Kozo Kataoka
- Division of Lower GI, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Henrik Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Theo Ruers
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Clinic Favoriten, HPB Center, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mladjan Protic
- University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia and Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplantation Service, Dept. of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Austria
| | - Stefan Staettner
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Austria
| | - Nuh Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Schnitzbauer
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hassan Malik
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Murielle Mauer
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, U1279, France
| | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mortality of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received elective or emergent operation after exposure to bevacizumab: A nationwide database study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:445-451. [PMID: 36208981 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate that surgical intervention within 4 weeks or 8 weeks after bevacizumab therapy might increase the risk of postoperative complications and mortality, especially in patients who received emergent operation. Therefore, we aimed to assess the association between different surgical timings, emergent or elective surgery, and the risk of postoperative mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry, we identified patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent surgery within 1 year of receiving bevacizumab between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 60-day, and in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcomes were hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, and surgical complications. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS This study included 2,047 patients. In the multivariate analysis, patients who underwent emergent operation and had higher Charlson scores had a significantly higher mortality rate. Patients with a longer interval to surgery, more cycles of bevacizumab treatment, and distal metastectomy had the opposite result. In subgroup analysis, patients who received emergent operation within 28 days had the highest surgical mortality. CONCLUSIONS The interval to operation among mCRC patients who receive bevacizumab treatment should exceed 4 weeks to avoid additional risk of mortality whether patients receiving elective or emergent operation. Patients who received emergent operation within 28 days of bevcizumab infusion had the highest risk of mortality.
Collapse
|
4
|
Fukuda K, Arigami T, Tokuda K, Yanagita S, Matsushita D, Kawasaki Y, Iino S, Sasaki K, Nakajo A, Kirishima M, Tanimoto A, Tsubouchi H, Kurahara H, Ohtsuka T. Successful conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer with liver metastases after second-line chemotherapy with ramucirumab and paclitaxel: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2022; 8:58. [PMID: 35362899 PMCID: PMC8975963 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01412-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, conversion surgery after chemotherapy has been considered a promising strategy for improving the prognosis of patients with stage IV gastric cancer. However, there are few reports on conversion gastrectomy after second-line chemotherapy. Here, we report a case of long-term survival of a patient with liver metastases from gastric cancer who underwent conversion surgery after second-line chemotherapy with ramucirumab and paclitaxel. CASE PRESENTATION A 77-year-old man complaining of weight loss was diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases. Although the patient initially received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, it was discontinued, because he experienced trastuzumab-induced infusion reactions. Thereafter, he was treated with six courses of S-1 plus cisplatin and six courses of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as the first- and second-line regimens, respectively. The primary tumor and liver metastases remarkably shrank, and the reduction rate of the measurable metastatic liver lesions was 81.1%. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the patient responded partially. Therefore, he underwent total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and partial hepatectomy of segments 3 and 4. Pathological examination revealed tumor invasion into the muscularis propria, a grade 1a histological response, and no lymph node metastases. No viable cancer cells were identified in the specimens resected from liver segments 3 and 4. Accordingly, the patient was pathologically diagnosed with stage IB (ypT2N0M0). Postoperatively, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 6 months, and he survived without recurrence for 42 months after conversion surgery. CONCLUSIONS Conversion surgery might be clinically useful for improving survival in certain patients with gastric cancer, including those who previously received second-line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Fukuda
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Takaaki Arigami
- Department of Onco-Biological Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Koki Tokuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobayashi City Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Yanagita
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsushita
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Yota Kawasaki
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Satoshi Iino
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Ken Sasaki
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Akihiro Nakajo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Mari Kirishima
- Department of Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Akihide Tanimoto
- Department of Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Tsubouchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobayashi City Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kurahara
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
- Department of Onco-Biological Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baldin P, Carrasco J, Beniuga G, Jouret-Mourin A, Demolin G, Roland S, D’Hondt L, Vergauwe P, Van Daele D, Mailleux M, Sinapi I, De Cuyper A, Blétard N, Massart B, Delos M, Castella ML, van Maanen A, Van den Eynde M. Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing Pathological Responses of Resected Colorectal Cancer Metastases after Bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI (BEV-ONCO Trial). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051183. [PMID: 35267491 PMCID: PMC8909786 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Retrospective studies reported that preoperative oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy increased pathological response (PR) in patients resected for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This multicenter prospective randomized (1/1) phase II trial evaluated PR on resected CRLM after preoperative mFOLFOX6 (arm A) or FOLFIRI (arm B) + bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response rate (MPRR), defined as the percentage of patients presenting CRLMs with mean tumor regression grade (TRG) < 3. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Out of 65 patients, 57 patients (28 and 29 in arm A/B) were resected for CRLM (one patient with lung metastases). Clinical and treatment characteristics were similar in both arms. One-month postoperative complications were 39.3%/31.0% in arm A/B (p = 0.585). MPRR and complete PR were 32.1%/20.7% (p = 0.379) and 14.3%/0.0% (p = 0.052) in arm A/B, respectively. PFS and OS were not different. Patients with PR among all CRLMs (max TRG ≤ 3; 43.8% of patients) had a lower risk of relapse (PFS: HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.204−0.840, p = 0.015) and a tendency towards better survival (OS: HR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.104−1.114, p = 0.075). The homogeneity of PR was associated with improved PFS/OS. This trial fails to demonstrate a significant increase in MPRR in patients treated with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab but confirms PR as an important prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Baldin
- Pathology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium; (P.B.); (A.J.-M.)
| | - Javier Carrasco
- Department of Medical Oncology, GHdC-Grad Hopital de Charleroi-Site Notre Dame, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium; (J.C.); (I.S.)
| | - Gabriela Beniuga
- Pathology Department, Institut de Pathologie et Génétique, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium;
| | - Anne Jouret-Mourin
- Pathology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium; (P.B.); (A.J.-M.)
- Pathology Department, Institut de Pathologie et Génétique, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium;
| | - Gauthier Demolin
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinique CHC MonLégia, 4000 Liège, Belgium;
| | - Sandrine Roland
- Gastroenterology Department, CHIREC-Hôpital Delta, 1160 Auderghem, Belgium;
| | - Lionel D’Hondt
- Oncology Department, CHU-UCL-Namur, Site Godinne, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - Philippe Vergauwe
- Gastroenterology Department, AZ Groeninge Hospital, 3220 Kortrijk, Belgium;
| | | | - Marie Mailleux
- Medical Oncology, Clinique Saint-Luc Bouge, 5000 Namur, Belgium;
| | - Isabelle Sinapi
- Department of Medical Oncology, GHdC-Grad Hopital de Charleroi-Site Notre Dame, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium; (J.C.); (I.S.)
| | - Astrid De Cuyper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium;
| | - Noëlla Blétard
- Pathology Department, Clinique CHC MonLégia, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (N.B.); (B.M.)
| | - Brigitte Massart
- Pathology Department, Clinique CHC MonLégia, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (N.B.); (B.M.)
| | - Monique Delos
- Pathology Department, CHU-UCL-Namur, Site Godinne, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - Marie-Laure Castella
- Colorectal Clinical Research Unit, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium;
| | - Aline van Maanen
- Support Statistique, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium;
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Department of Medical Oncology and Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc (UCL)—Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score matching comparative study. Int J Surg 2021; 94:106106. [PMID: 34536602 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) is at an advanced tumor stage and requires multidisciplinary treatments. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is thought to be an effective treatment modality, but its prognostic impact is still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with resectable SCRLM presented to eight university hospitals between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust baseline characteristics between patients who received NAC with those who underwent up-front hepatectomy. The prognostic impact of NAC was then evaluated. RESULTS The cohort comprised of 320 patients: 151 patients received NAC and the remaining 169 patients underwent up-front hepatectomy. After a 1:1 ratio of PSM, 102 patients per group were selected. Within the PSM cohort, 66% patients had multiple liver tumors, with 15% having five or more liver tumors. The median survival (95% confidence interval) periods for patients with and without NAC in the PSM cohort were 88.5 (68.4 - not reached) and 84.2 (52.1 - not reached) months, respectively (P = 0.51). On multivariate analysis, the postoperative events in these patients including operative complications and use of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy were prognostic factors with hazards (95% confidence interval) being 1.88 (1.18-2.98) and 0.65 (0.42-1.01), respectively. CONCLUSION This PSM study was restricted to patients with SCRLM and relatively advanced tumor stagings. NAC did not show any significant prognostic impact. While operative complications had a significant prognostic impact, use of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy had only a marginal prognostic impact. Reconsideration of indications for NAC is needed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jácome AA, Oliveira FA, Lino F, Lima JPSN. Effect of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy on Pathologic Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:265-272. [PMID: 34158251 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer is a potentially curable disease. Pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the overall effect of bevacizumab on pR in preoperative systemic therapy for CLM. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and LILACS for studies published between January 2004 and August 2019 that compared the pR of CT plus bevacizumab to CT alone as preoperative therapy for CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were pathologic major (pMaR) and minor (pMiR) response. Overall effects were expressed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. RESULTS Of the 1,452 studies yielded by the search, 9 were eligible, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab and 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate without reaching statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.92, P = .32). However, pMaR was significantly higher (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.25, P < .001), and pMiR was significantly lower (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54, P < .001), in the bevacizumab group. The analyses showed a low level of heterogeneity (I2 = 0% to 6%). Publication bias was not found. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrates that bevacizumab plus preoperative CT is associated with higher rates of pR in CLM. Antiangiogenics might improve the OS of CLM patients and should be evaluated in randomized clinical trials. MICROABSTRACT The benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is uncertain, but pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor. Our meta-analysis of observational studies compared the pR of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone as preoperative systemic therapy in the management of CLM. The addition of bevacizumab was associated with significantly higher rates of pR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre A Jácome
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclinicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | | | - Flora Lino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclinicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Predictors of complications after liver surgery: a systematic review of the literature. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:645-655. [PMID: 33485797 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous potential predictors of adverse outcomes have been reported but their performance and utilization in practice seem heterogenous. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the role and value of predictors of complications after hepatectomy. METHODS A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies on liver transplant were excluded. Only studies assessing overall or major complications were included. RESULTS A total of 10'965 abstracts were screened. After application of exclusion criteria, 72 articles including 68'480 patients were included. A total of 72 markers with 48 pre-, 9 intra- and 15 postoperative factors were identified as predictors of complications. Preoperative and intraoperative predictive markers retrieved several times with the highest odds ratios (OR) were ASA score (OR range: 1.3-7.5, significant in 8 studies) and intraoperative need for red blood cell transfusion (OR range: 1.2-17.1, significant in 24 studies), respectively. CONCLUSION Numerous markers have been described to predict the complication risk after hepatectomy. Because of their intrinsic characteristics, most markers such as ASA score and need for red blood cell transfusion are of limited clinical interest. There is a clear need to identify new biomarkers and to develop scores that could easily be implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang HL, Jones AL. Current Status of Biologics in Perioperative Treatment for Resectable or Borderline Resectable Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00464-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
10
|
Krasnodebski M, Kim BJ, Wei SH, Velasco JD, Nishioka Y, Vauthey JN. Chemotherapy in combination with resection for colorectal liver metastases – current evidence. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
11
|
Miyamoto R, Kikuchi K, Uchida A, Ozawa M, Sano N, Tadano S, Inagawa S, Oda T, Ohkohchi N. Pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy including FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 62:85-88. [PMID: 31476559 PMCID: PMC6726879 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer remain unclear. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was a promising treatment for unresectable rectal cancer. Earlier preoperative systemic chemotherapy was assumed to prevent the dissemination.
Background In Japan, the significance and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer remain controversial. This case report presents the apparent effectiveness of preoperative FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as shown by pathological complete response (pCR). Additionally, we review the relevant literature and discuss the clinical management of locally advanced rectal cancer with preoperative chemotherapy. Case presentation A 59-year-old male presented with severe constipation, bloody stool and a loss of 10% of his body weight over 3 months. Preoperative examination revealed locally advanced rectal cancer with extensive invasion of the bladder wall and enlarged regional lymph nodes. Thus, this lesion was assigned a preoperative classification of T4bN2bM0 stage IIIC according to the 8th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) guidelines. Therefore, the patient initially underwent an external loop colostomy of the transverse colon. Next, the patient received chemotherapy including FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. After 12 cycles of chemotherapy, the tumor size was markedly decreased, and all lymph node metastases had disappeared. Therefore, the patient underwent conventional resection of the rectum with D3 lymph node dissection and closure of the colostomy. Histopathological analysis of the resected specimen revealed that all lesions were fibrotic and devoid of any viable cancer cells. Thus, this lesion was assigned a final classification of ypT0N0M0 stage 0. Conclusions We present the rare case of a patient with surgically resected locally advanced rectal cancer who demonstrated an impressive pCR with preoperative chemotherapy, which included FOLFOX plus bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan; Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Kazunori Kikuchi
- Department of Pathology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Atsushi Uchida
- Department of Pathology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Ozawa
- Department of Pathology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Naoki Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Sosuke Tadano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Satoshi Inagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Oda
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Perioperative Bevacizumab-based Triplet Chemotherapy in Patients With Potentially Resectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:34-43.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
13
|
Cetin B, Bilgetekin I, Cengiz M, Ozet A. Managing Synchronous Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2018; 9:461-471. [PMID: 30538373 PMCID: PMC6265172 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0765-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common site of blood-borne metastases from colorectal cancers (CRC) is the liver. Resection of (liver) metastases is a part of standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Hepatic resection is the first-line treatment of liver metastases, with 5-year survival rates between 25 and 58%. The enhanced efficacy of systemic chemotherapeutic regimens has increased tumor response rates and improved the progression-free and overall survival of patients with these malignancies. In approximately 20% of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases, the metastases may become resectable after administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Unresectable liver metastases can be managed with systemic therapy and/or a variety of liver-directed techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, hepatic artery infusion, or yttrium-90 radioembolization. Our examination of the literature led us to propose a new patient-oriented algorithm to guide clinicians' decisions on the best choice of upfront therapy for CRC and synchronous liver metastases. The need for multidisciplinary consensus has become especially important for metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bulent Cetin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Faculty of Medicine, 53200 Rize, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Ozet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li CC, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Yeh YS, Tsai TH, Wang JY. Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Two case reports. Mol Clin Oncol 2018; 9:499-503. [PMID: 30345042 PMCID: PMC6174392 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Pseudoaneurysms are extremely rare in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab in the first-line setting. We herein present two rare cases of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm developing in patients with mCRC after administration of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. The first patient was a 57-year-old man who was admitted to our institution with intermittent massive bloody discharge following treatment with the 9th cycle of FOLFIRI combined with bevacizumab. Colonoscopic examination revealed sizeable bloody clots in the rectum, but no active bleeder was identified; however, the patient's hemoglobin level was found to be persistently decreased, so an angiography was performed. The angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm with contrast extravasation from a branch of the left internal iliac artery. Embolization of the bleeding vessel was performed, and the post-embolization angiography revealed no active bleeding. The second patient was a 65-year-old man who observed blood in the stool following treatment with the 5th cycle of FOLFIRI combined with bevacizumab. The angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm in the superior rectal artery, and intravascular embolization with coils was performed. The patient was discharged without any signs of recurrent bleeding. Following a review of the relevant English literature, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the formation of a bevacizumab-related pseudoaneurysms in mCRC patients. The aim of this study was to alert clinicians to the possibility of this rare complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Chun Li
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ching-Wen Huang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Yung-Sung Yeh
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Tzu-Hsueh Tsai
- Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C.,Center for Biomarkers and Biotech Drugs, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A Population-Based Study of Complications After Colorectal Surgery in Patients Who Have Received Bevacizumab. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61:306-313. [PMID: 29420426 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients receiving Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, may be at greater risk of complications after colorectal surgery because of impaired healing. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe population-based rates of complications of colorectal surgery after Bevacizumab treatment and evaluate the relationship between time since last treatment and risk of complications. DESIGN This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative and cancer registry data. SETTINGS The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving Bevacizumab between January 2008 and December 2011 were followed for a year after treatment or until death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Administrative data were used to identify patients who underwent colorectal surgery after initiation of Bevacizumab and to determine whether they experienced a complicated postoperative course. The relationship between time since last Bevacizumab treatment (≤28 d, 29 d to 3 mo, and >3 mo) and risk of postoperative complications was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 2759 patients who received Bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 265 underwent a colorectal procedure after exposure. The majority had a bowel resection or repair with no stoma (47.5%) and had emergency surgery (61.1%). Overall, 96 (36.2%) had a complicated postoperative course, including 20.4% readmission, 12.5% wound complications, and 7.9% mortality rate within 30 days of surgery. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed no difference in the likelihood of a complicated postoperative course among patients undergoing surgery within 28 days of receiving their last Bevacizumab dose compared with 29 days to 3 months (OR = 1.23 (95% CI, 0.53-2.84), or 3 to 12 months (OR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.46-2.09) after receiving Bevacizumab. LIMITATIONS Reliance on administrative data to measure complications limited the scope of this study. CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer requiring colorectal surgery after exposure to Bevacizumab experience substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk of complications is not detectably associated with time since exposure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A474.
Collapse
|
16
|
Vigano L, Darwish SS, Rimassa L, Cimino M, Carnaghi C, Donadon M, Procopio F, Personeni N, Del Fabbro D, Santoro A, Torzilli G. Progression of Colorectal Liver Metastases from the End of Chemotherapy to Resection: A New Contraindication to Surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1676-1685. [PMID: 29488188 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6387-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Not all patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) benefit from liver resection (LR); only patients with disease progression during chemotherapy are excluded from surgery. OBJECTIVE This study was performed to determine whether tumor behavior (stable disease/progression) from the end of chemotherapy to LR impacts prognosis. METHODS Patients undergoing LR after tumor response or stabilization during chemotherapy were considered. Overall, 128 patients who underwent examination by two imaging modalities (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) after chemotherapy with a > 3-week interval between the two imaging modalities were analyzed. Any variation in CLM size was registered. Tumor progression was defined according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. RESULTS Among 128 patients with stable disease or partial response to preoperative chemotherapy, 32 (25%) developed disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval, with a disease progression rate of 17% when this interval was < 8 weeks. Survival was lower among patients with progression than those with stable disease [3-year overall survival (OS) 23.0 vs. 52.4%, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) 6.3% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.001]. Survival was extremely poor in patients with early progression (< 8 weeks) (0.0% 2-year OS, 12.5% 6-month RFS). Disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and RFS [hazard ratio 3.144 and 2.350, respectively; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Early disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval occurred in approximately 15% of patients and was associated with extremely poor survival. Even if these data require validation, the risk for early disease progression after chemotherapy should be considered, and, if progression is evident, the indication for surgery should be cautiously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Vigano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Shadya Sara Darwish
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Cimino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Carnaghi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Procopio
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Personeni
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Del Fabbro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kachaamy T, Gupta D, Edwin P, Vashi P. Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176899. [PMID: 28472195 PMCID: PMC5417598 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28 days before and after surgery. However, there are no specific guidelines which address their use around endoscopic procedures because data regarding the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients while on AAs is scarce despite the fact that these patients often require endoscopy. This study investigated the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients receiving AAs. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study of a consecutive case series of 445 cancer patients undergoing endoscopy within 31 days of administration of AAs at 5 specialized cancer centers between April 2008 and August 2014. Endoscopies were classified into two different categories based on the risk of GI bleeding and perforation: low and high. The primary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and death within 30 days of endoscopy. The severity of AEs was classified according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of AEs and mortality was calculated using the total number of patients as the denominator. RESULTS 445 cancer patients with a mean age of 54 years underwent a total of 545 endoscopies. Median time duration from AAs to endoscopy was 11 days. Of 545 endoscopic procedures, 398 (73%) were low-risk and 147 (27%) were high-risk. There were 3 procedure-related AEs: esophageal perforation (grade 3) two days after an EGD, pancreatitis (grade 5) a day after failed ERCP, and bleeding from the gastrostomy site (grade 1) two days after an EGD. Of 445 patients, 29 (6.5%) died within 30 days of the procedure with no deaths deemed procedure-related. The most common causes of death were terminal cancer (n = 10), hepatic decompensation (n = 5) and sepsis (n = 4). CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, the rate of endoscopy-related AEs in patients on AAs appears to be low when performed in specialized cancer centers. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toufic Kachaamy
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America
| | - Digant Gupta
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America
| | - Persis Edwin
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America
| | - Pankaj Vashi
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fukuoka K, Nara S, Honma Y, Kishi Y, Esaki M, Shimada K. Hepatectomy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Preoperative Chemotherapy: Evaluation of Postoperative Complications. World J Surg 2017; 41:1073-1081. [PMID: 27679508 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3724-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, an increasing number of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer have received chemotherapy before hepatectomy. However, the effect of chemotherapy on postoperative short-term outcome is not well defined. METHODS We retrospectively investigated the postoperative complications of 439 patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in our division from 2005 to 2014. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence (Cx; 84 patients) or absence (NCx; 355 patients) of preoperative chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the predictive factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS There was neither mortality nor liver failure after surgery. There was no significant difference in the frequency of postoperative complications between Groups Cx and NCx [29 vs 26 % for all complications; both 6 % for bile leakage that required therapeutic intervention; and 2 vs 3 % for Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade ≥ IIIa, respectively]. In Group Cx, morbidity rates were similar among patients with different chemotherapy regimens. Chemotherapy-related factors (administration of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin or irinotecan, duration of chemotherapy >150 days, and timing of hepatectomy) were not significantly associated with clinically relevant bile leakage and CD ≥ IIIa in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Even after combination chemotherapy including targeted therapy, hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases can be performed safely without increasing morbidity or mortality, if the patients fulfill the conventional criteria for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kengo Fukuoka
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Yoshitaka Honma
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoji Kishi
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Shimada
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bergeat D, Rayar M, Mouchel Y, Merdrignac A, Meunier B, Lièvre A, Boudjema K, Sulpice L. Preoperative bevacizumab and surgery for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402:57-67. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1551-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
20
|
Bear HD, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE, Zoon CK, Kidwell KM, Robidoux A, Baez-Diaz L, Brufsky AM, Mehta RS, Fehrenbacher L, Young JA, Senecal FM, Gaur R, Margolese RG, Adams PT, Gross HM, Costantino JP, Paik S, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. The Effect on Surgical Complications of Bevacizumab Added to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: NRG Oncology/NSABP Protocol B-40. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:1853-1860. [PMID: 27864694 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5662-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NRG Oncology/NSABP trial B-40 tested the impact of adding bevacizumab (bev) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Secondary endpoints included rates of surgical complications after surgery in patients who did or did not receive bev. METHODS A total of 1206 women with HER2-negative operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of three different docetaxel-plus-anthracycline-based regimens, without or with bev (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for the first 6 of 8 cycles and for 10 doses postoperatively. Surgical complications were assessed from date of surgery through 24 months following study entry. RESULTS Early surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the bev group (25.4 vs. 18.9%; trend test p = 0.008), but most were grade 1-2. Early noninfectious wound dehiscences were infrequent and not significantly different (5.4 vs. 3.1%; trend test p = 0.15). Long-term noninfectious wound complications were significantly higher for patients receiving bev (11.8 vs. 5.1%; trend test p = 0.0007), but the incidence of grade ≥3 wound dehiscence was low in both groups (<1%). Among 193 patients undergoing expander or implant reconstructions, 19 (19.6%) of 97 in the bev-receiving group versus 10 (10.4%) of 96 in the non-bev group had grade ≥3 complications (Pearson, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS Overall, adding bev increased surgical complications, but most serious complications were not significantly increased. In particular, the need for surgical intervention in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants was higher with bev but was not statistically significantly different. With precautions, bev can be used safely perioperatively in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry D Bear
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Gong Tang
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Rastogi
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Charles E Geyer
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Christine K Zoon
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - André Robidoux
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Luis Baez-Diaz
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, PR, USA
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh/Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rita S Mehta
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,School of Medicine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Louis Fehrenbacher
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials, Northern California, Vallejo, CA, USA
| | - James A Young
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,CCOP, Colorado Cancer Research Program, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | - Francis M Senecal
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,CCOP, North-West Medical Specialties, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Rakesh Gaur
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Kansas City Clinical Oncology Program, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Richard G Margolese
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul T Adams
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Genesys Regional Medical Center, Grand Blanc, MI, USA
| | - Howard M Gross
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Dayton CCOP, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P Costantino
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Severance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sandra M Swain
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) (NSABP legacy trials are now part of the NRG Oncology portfolio), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Andres A, Majno P, Terraz S, Morel P, Roth A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Schiffer E, Ris F, Toso C. Management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis in eleven questions and answers. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:1277-1290. [PMID: 27744725 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1249855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the most frequent indication for liver resection in many centers. Recent improvements in oncology, surgery, interventional radiology, pathology and anesthesiology allow curative treatment in a larger proportion of patients with CRLM. Areas covered: We illustrate the various aspects of the management of CRLM through 11 questions that summarize the topic, from the current obtained survival to future perspectives such as transplantation. The limits of a curative treatment are also presented from different angles, such as the benefits of pathology, the surgical options for extreme resections, the available chemotherapies and their efficacy, or the non-surgical ablative treatments. Expert commentary: Given the increasing therapeutic possibilities, we strengthen the importance to analyze the situation of each patient with CRLM in a dedicated multidisciplinary team, in order to offer the best individualized treatment combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Andres
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,b Faculty of Medicine, Division of Abdominal Surgery , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Pietro Majno
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,b Faculty of Medicine, Division of Abdominal Surgery , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Sylvain Terraz
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,c Faculty of Medicine, Division of Radiology , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Philippe Morel
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,b Faculty of Medicine, Division of Abdominal Surgery , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Arnaud Roth
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,d Faculty of Medicine, Division of Oncology , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Laura Rubbia-Brandt
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,e Faculty of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pathology , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Schiffer
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,f Faculty of Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Frederic Ris
- b Faculty of Medicine, Division of Abdominal Surgery , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- a Faculty of Medicine, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland.,b Faculty of Medicine, Division of Abdominal Surgery , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Matsushima S, Sato T, Nishiofuku H, Sato Y, Murata S, Kinosada Y, Era S, Inaba Y. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging and diffusion weighted imaging for early prediction of response to bevacizumab-containing treatment in colorectal liver metastases-preliminary study. Clin Imaging 2016; 41:1-6. [PMID: 27721090 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compare the usefulness of equivalent cross-relaxation rate (ECR) imaging (ECRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the early prediction of the response of bevacizumab-containing treatments of colorectal liver metastases. METHODS AND MATERIAL Seven patients received bevacizumab-containing treatments for colorectal liver metastases. Serial magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate responses before and 2 weeks after starting chemotherapy. In the ECRI, we adopted the off-resonance technique for preferential saturation of immobile protons to evaluate the ECR values. A single saturation transfer pulse frequency was used at a frequency of 3.5 ppm downfield from the water resonance. In the DWI, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value commonly used with two b-values was acquired by using diffusion weightings of 0 and 800 s/mm2. The region of interest of the metastatic lesions in the liver was separately measured by ECRI and DWI. Tumor response was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria 8 weeks after starting chemotherapy. RESULTS In this study, we had four responders and three nonresponders. There was a significant difference in the pretreatment ECR values between the responders and nonresponders (P=.01); there was no significant difference in the ADC values between the two groups. Analysis of the percentage difference between the pretreatment and post-treatment values, termed as percentage change, showed that there were no significant differences in the percentage change of the ADC values between both groups; however, the percentage change in the ECR value was significantly greater for the responders than for the nonresponders (-41.6%±17.1% vs. -12.9%±6.9%, respectively; P=.04). CONCLUSION The pretreatment ECR value and percentage change of the ECR value 2 weeks after starting chemotherapy were useful parameters in the early prediction of response to bevacizumab-containing treatment in colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeru Matsushima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-0021, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Sato
- Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Nishiofuku
- Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, Japan
| | - Yozo Sato
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-0021, Japan
| | - Shinichi Murata
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-0021, Japan
| | - Yasutomi Kinosada
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Seiichi Era
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Inaba
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-0021, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Use of Bevacizumab in the Management of Potentially Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Safety, Pathologic Assessment and Benefit. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-016-0326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
24
|
Simoneau E, Alanazi R, Alshenaifi J, Molla N, Aljiffry M, Medkhali A, Boucher LM, Asselah J, Metrakos P, Hassanain M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not impair liver regeneration following hepatectomy or portal vein embolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113:449-55. [PMID: 26955907 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Treatment strategies for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) such as major hepatectomy and portal vein embolization (PVE) rely on liver regeneration. We aim to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration occurring after PVE and after major hepatectomy. METHODS CRCLM patients undergoing PVE or major resection were identified retrospectively from our database. Liver regeneration data (expressed as future liver remnant [FLR] and percentage of liver regeneration [%LR]), total liver volume (TLV) and clinical characteristics were collected. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2013, 226 patients were included (85 major resection, 141 PVE). The median chemotherapy cycles was six in both groups. The median time interval between the last chemotherapy and the intervention was 51 days in the PVE group and 79 days in the hepatectomy group. In the PVE group, chemotherapy was not associated with altered liver regeneration (number of cycles [P = 0.435], timing [P = 0.563], or chemotherapy agent [P = 0.116]). Similarly in the major hepatectomy group, preoperative chemotherapy (number of cycles [P = 0.114]; agent [P = 0.061], timing [P = 0.126]) were not significantly associated with differences in liver regeneration (P = 0.592). In both groups, the predicted FLR% was inversely correlated with the %LR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Chemotherapy does not affect liver regeneration following PVE or major resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:449-455. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Simoneau
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Reema Alanazi
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jumanah Alshenaifi
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nouran Molla
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Murad Aljiffry
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad Medkhali
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Jamil Asselah
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mazen Hassanain
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Impact of Bevacizumab on parenchymal damage and functional recovery of the liver in patients with colorectal liver metastases. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:84. [PMID: 26864935 PMCID: PMC4750178 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2095-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the safety of the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of bevacizumab on parenchymal damage and functional recovery in patients undergoing resection for CLM. Methods The Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies on preoperative chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab prior to resection of CLM. Studies that reported histological and/or clinical outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. Results A total of 18 studies with a total sample size of 2430 patients (1050 patients with bevacizumab) were found. Meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) (Odds ratio 0.50 [95 % confidence interval 0.37, 0.67]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0 %) and hepatic fibrosis (0.61 [0.4, 0.86]; p = 0.004; I2 = 7 %) after preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab. The reduced incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with bevacizumab treatment just failed to reach statistical significance (0.61 [0.34, 1.07]; p = 0.08 I2 = 6 %). While there was no difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality, the incidence of wound complications was significantly increased in patients who received bevacizumab (1.81 [1.12, 2.91]; p = 0.02 I2 = 4 %). Conclusions The combination of bevacizumab with cytotoxic chemotherapy is safe but increases the incidence of wound complications after resection of CLM. The reduction of SOS and hepatic fibrosis warrant further investigation and may explain the inverse association of bevacizumab administration and posthepatectomy liver failure. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2095-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
26
|
Simoneau E, Hassanain M, Shaheen M, Aljiffry M, Molla N, Chaudhury P, Anil S, Khashper A, Valenti D, Metrakos P. Portal vein embolization and its effect on tumour progression for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1240-1249. [PMID: 26109487 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2014] [Revised: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) exhibiting disease progression after portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS Patients with CRCLM requiring PVE before hepatectomy between 2003 and 2014 were included. Clinical variables, and liver and tumour volumes determined by three-dimensional CT volumetry were assessed before and after PVE. Overall and disease-free survival data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of tumour progression after PVE. RESULTS Of 141 patients who underwent PVE, 93 (66.0 per cent) had tumour progression and 17 (12.1 per cent) developed new contralateral lesions. Significantly fewer patients had resectable disease in the group with disease progression than among those with stable disease: 43 (46 per cent) of 93 versus 36 (75 per cent) of 48 respectively (P = 0.001). Median survival was similar in patients with and without tumour growth after PVE: 22.5 versus 26.0 months for patients with unresectable tumours (P = 0.706) and 46.2 versus 52.2 months for those with resectable disease (P = 0.953). However, disease-free survival for patients with tumour progression after PVE was shorter than that for patients with stable disease (6.0 versus 20.2 months; P = 0.045). Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the only significant factor associated with tumour progression in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Tumour progression after PVE did not affect overall survival, but patients with resected tumours who had tumour growth after embolization experienced earlier recurrence. A borderline response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be associated with tumour progression after PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Simoneau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Hassanain
- Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Shaheen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Aljiffry
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - N Molla
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - P Chaudhury
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - S Anil
- Department of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Khashper
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pollom EL, Deng L, Pai RK, Brown JM, Giaccia A, Loo BW, Shultz DB, Le QT, Koong AC, Chang DT. Gastrointestinal Toxicities With Combined Antiangiogenic and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:568-76. [PMID: 26068491 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Combining the latest targeted biologic agents with the most advanced radiation technologies has been an exciting development in the treatment of cancer patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an ablative radiation approach that has become established for the treatment of a variety of malignancies, and it has been increasingly used in combination with biologic agents, including those targeting angiogenesis-specific pathways. Multiple reports have emerged describing unanticipated toxicities arising from the combination of SBRT and angiogenesis-targeting agents, particularly of late luminal gastrointestinal toxicities. In this review, we summarize the literature describing these toxicities, explore the biological mechanism of action of toxicity with the combined use of antiangiogenic therapies, and discuss areas of future research, so that this combination of treatment modalities can continue to be used in broader clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - J Martin Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Amato Giaccia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - David B Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Konda B, Shum H, Rajdev L. Anti-angiogenic agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7:71-86. [PMID: 26191351 PMCID: PMC4501927 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health concern being the third leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. The availability of better therapeutic options has led to a decline in cancer mortality in these patients. Surgical resection should be considered in all stages of the disease. The use of conversion therapy has made surgery a potentially curative option even in patients with initially unresectable metastatic disease. In this review we discuss the role of various anti-angiogenic agents in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We describe the mechanism of action of these agents, and the rationale for their use in combination with chemotherapy. We also review important clinical studies that have evaluated the safety and efficacy of these agents in mCRC patients. Despite the discovery of several promising anti-angiogenic agents, mCRC remains an incurable disease with a median overall survival of just over 2 years in patients exposed to all available treatment regimens. Further insights into tumor biology and tumor microenvironment may help improve outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Petrillo M, Paris I, Vizzielli G, Amadio G, Cosentino F, Salutari V, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Maintenance Therapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Unresectable High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S952-8. [PMID: 26036187 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4651-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity, perioperative outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS), and duration of progression-free survival (PFS) in women with unresectable high-grade serous advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with or without bevacizumab. METHODS Twenty-five patients with high-grade serous AOC treated with bevacizumab-based NACT (cases) were matched according to initial disease extension assessed by laparoscopy, and age, in a 1:2 ratio, with 50 high-grade serous AOC patients treated with standard NACT without bevacizumab (controls). RESULTS Both groups received a median of four NACT cycles before IDS (p = 0.867), and the median time interval between NACT and IDS was 27 days in both groups (p = 0.547). Twenty-two cases (88.0 %) showed complete/partial radiologic response compared with 36 controls (72.3 %; p = 0.054). A higher percentage of cases showed complete serological response (48 vs. 35.1 %; p = 0.041). At IDS, complete cytoreduction was achieved in 20 cases (80.0 %) and 36 controls (72.3 %) [p = 0.260]. No differences were observed between groups in terms of surgical complexity score, perioperative outcomes, surgical complications, and chemotherapy-related adverse events. One death due to gastrointestinal perforation was observed among cases. Cases showed a longer median PFS compared with controls (18 months vs. 10 months; p = 0.001), and the administration of bevacizumab (hazard ratio 3.786; p = 0.001) retained a prognostic role for longer PFS at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS The incorporation of bevacizumab in NACT prolongs PFS without affecting the safety of IDS. The risk of gastrointestinal perforation should be considered prior to attempting bevacizumab-based NACT in women with diffuse bowel involvement at initial laparoscopic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Petrillo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Foundation John Paul II, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Campobasso, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Amadio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abrams DA, Hanson JA, Brown JM, Hsu FPK, Delashaw JB, Bota DA. Timing of surgery and bevacizumab therapy in neurosurgical patients with recurrent high grade glioma. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 22:35-9. [PMID: 25481268 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2013] [Revised: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 05/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Malignant gliomas continue to have a dismal prognosis despite all available treatments and advances made in understanding molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways. Conventional treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, have been used with limited success. Bevacizumab is a recently described molecule, which inhibits endothelial proliferation and prevents formation of new blood vessels in tumor. However, this treatment confers increased hemorrhage risk and impairs wound healing. Therefore, the timing of surgery for patients receiving bevacizumab, who are in need of surgery, is critical. We performed a literature review to establish the appropriate timing between the cessation of bevacizumab therapy and surgical intervention. Our literature review indicated that the optimum time between cessation of bevacizumab therapy and surgery was 4 weeks. The timing for re-initiation of bevacizumab post-surgery was at least 2 weeks. The duration of preoperative cessation of bevacizumab treatment is critical in preventing life threatening surgical complications. The interval between the surgery and re-initiation of bevacizumab can be shortened. However, more studies are needed to ascertain the exact timing of preoperative and postoperative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alexandru Abrams
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Building 200, Orange, CA 92868, USA; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - Joseph A Hanson
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Justin M Brown
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Frank P K Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Building 200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Johnny B Delashaw
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Building 200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Daniela A Bota
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Building 200, Orange, CA 92868, USA; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wong P, Houghton P, Kirsch DG, Finkelstein SE, Monjazeb AM, Xu-Welliver M, Dicker AP, Ahmed M, Vikram B, Teicher BA, Coleman CN, Machtay M, Curran WJ, Wang D. Combining targeted agents with modern radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju329. [PMID: 25326640 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Improved understanding of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) biology has led to better distinction and subtyping of these diseases with the hope of exploiting the molecular characteristics of each subtype to develop appropriately targeted treatment regimens. In the care of patients with extremity STS, adjunctive radiation therapy (RT) is used to facilitate limb and function, preserving surgeries while maintaining five-year local control above 85%. In contrast, for STS originating from nonextremity anatomical sites, the rate of local recurrence is much higher (five-year local control is approximately 50%) and a major cause of death and morbidity in these patients. Incorporating novel technological advancements to administer accurate RT in combination with novel radiosensitizing agents could potentially improve local control and overall survival. RT efficacy in STS can be increased by modulating biological pathways such as angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, cell survival signaling, and cancer-host immune interactions. Previous experiences, advancements, ongoing research, and current clinical trials combining RT with agents modulating one or more of the above pathways are reviewed. The standard clinical management of patients with STS with pretreatment biopsy, neoadjuvant treatment, and primary surgery provides an opportune disease model for interrogating translational hypotheses. The purpose of this review is to outline a strategic vision for clinical translation of preclinical findings and to identify appropriate targeted agents to combine with radiotherapy in the treatment of STS from different sites and/or different histology subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Peter Houghton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Steven E Finkelstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Arta M Monjazeb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Meng Xu-Welliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Mansoor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Beverly A Teicher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW)
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (PW); Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (PH); Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DGK); 21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium (TRC) Headquarters, Scottsdale, AZ (SEF); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (AMM); Department of Radiation Oncology, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (MXW); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (APD); Radiotherapy Development Branch & Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (MA, CNC); Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BV); Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (BAT); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (MM); Winship Cancer Institute, Woodruff Health Science Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (DW).
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clark ME, Smith RR. Liver-directed therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5:374-87. [PMID: 25276410 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health concern in the United States (US) with over 140,000 new cases diagnosed in 2012. The most common site for CRC metastases is the liver. Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 35% to 58%. Unfortunately, only about 20% of patients are eligible for resection. There are a number of options for extending resection to more advanced patients including systemic chemotherapy, portal vein embolization (PVE), two stage hepatectomy, ablation and hepatic artery infusion (HAI). There are few phase III trials comparing these treatment modalities, and choosing the right treatment is patient dependent. Treating hepatic metastases requires a multidisciplinary approach and knowledge of all treatment options as there continues to be advances in management of CLM. If a patient can undergo a treatment modality in order to increase their potential for future resection this should be the primary goal. If the patient is still deemed unresectable then treatments that lengthen disease-free and overall-survival should be pursued. These include chemotherapy, ablation, HAI, chemoembolization, radioembolization (RE) and stereotactic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret E Clark
- Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96859, USA
| | - Richard R Smith
- Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96859, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Giakoustidis A, Neofytou K, Khan A, Mudan S. Addition of bevacizumab to preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases does not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality. Hepat Oncol 2014; 1:363-375. [PMID: 30190972 PMCID: PMC6095412 DOI: 10.2217/hep.14.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) benefit from liver resection. Bevacizumab is commonly used in these patients resulting in a greater number of patients receiving an operation for a potentially curative liver resection, with initially unresectable liver metastases. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of preoperative bevacizumab administration on perioperative complications in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM who received only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group, n = 133), or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab (chemotherapy and bevacizumab group, n = 103). We compared surgical characteristics, perioperative complications and postoperative liver function. RESULTS The type of liver resection (minor vs major liver resection) was comparable in the two groups (major liver resection 52.6 vs 62.1%, p = 0.144). The addition of bevacizumab to preoperative chemotherapy does not affect the frequency (chemotherapy group vs chemotherapy and bevacizumab group, 35.3 vs 38.8%, p = 0.581), severity (major complications, 20.3 vs 19.4%, p = 0.487) and type of perioperative complications. Preoperative administration of bevacizumab was associated with a higher peak of postoperative alanine aminotransferase levels but did not affect functional recovery of the liver. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant administration of bevacizumab was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications after hepatic resection and did not affect the liver's functional recovery. Patients receiving more than eight cycles of bevacizumab are at an increased risk to develop perioperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kyriakos Neofytou
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Aamir Khan
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Satvinder Mudan
- Department of Surgery, The London Clinic, 116 Harley Street, London, W1G 7JL, UK
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Management of Colon Cancer and Liver Metastases: Is There a Role for Molecularly Targeted Agents? CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-014-0213-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
35
|
Scilletta R, Pagano D, Spada M, Mongiovì S, Pesce A, Portale TR, Guardabasso V, Puleo S, Gruttadauria S. Comparative analysis of the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with liver resection for colorectal hepatic metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Res 2014; 188:183-189. [PMID: 24398304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2013] [Revised: 11/01/2013] [Accepted: 11/15/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) and postoperative complications, as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification, after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with and without associated neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS A total of 181 patients were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group comprised patients with associated neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment for liver metastases with a latency time <8 wk and the second group comprised patients without associated neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Variables of duration of liver surgery, length of total hospital stay, and length of postoperative hospital stay seem to be correlated with SSIs and postoperative complications, P < 0.005 and P < 0.0001, respectively. Duration of surgery is a risk factor for SSIs, with an odds ratio of 1.15, and for complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with an odds ratio of 1.35. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor for SSIs, whereas the total length of hospital stay, length of postoperative hospital stay, and duration of surgery were independent predictors of SSIs and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Scilletta
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Catania, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.
| | - Duilio Pagano
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Italy, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Spada
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Italy, Palermo, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Mongiovì
- Department of Abdominal Oncology Surgery, Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Pesce
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Catania, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
| | - Teresa R Portale
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Catania, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Guardabasso
- Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Puleo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Catania, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Italy, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bevacizumab and wound-healing complications: mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, and management recommendations for the plastic surgeon. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 71:434-40. [PMID: 22868316 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e31824e5e57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Reflecting the growing understanding of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cancer survival and growth, the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) is increasingly used to treat advanced malignancy. However, because VEGF also mediates proper wound healing, bevacizumab may lead to potentially severe wound-healing complications (WHCs). Because bevacizumab expands in use, the plastic surgeon will increasingly be entrusted to manage such WHCs successfully. Therefore, this review summarizes the pathophysiological evidence, systematically reviews the available clinical evidence, and provides management guidelines for bevacizumab-related WHCs. Bevacizumab produces WHCs by disrupting vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and angiogenesis. Current clinical evidence suggests that bevacizumab may increase WHC risk. This risk seems higher with neoadjuvant than adjuvant bevacizumab use and may be decreased by extending the bevacizumab-surgery interval. Further research is required to quantify the exact bevacizumab-related WHC incidence and optimize the bevacizumab-surgery interval. We propose management guidelines for bevacizumab-related WHCs by indication that should be integrated with clinical judgment, input from the oncology team, and patient wishes when making therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ceelen W, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Putte DV, Pattyn P. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab may improve outcome after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) for colorectal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3023-8. [PMID: 24756812 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3713-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) may improve survival. We aimed to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab is indicated in this patient population. METHODS Colorectal PC patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC using oxaliplatin (200-460 mg/m(2)) or mitomycin C (35 mg/m(2)). Postoperative outcome and long-term survival were prospectively recorded. The impact of clinical variables on overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and Cox multivariate analysis. RESULTS Between October 2002 and May 2012, 166 patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone was administered to 21 % and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab to 16 % of patients. Postoperative mortality and major morbidity were 2.4 and 35 %, respectively. Half of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 18 months, OS was 27 months (95 % confidence interval 20.8-33.2). On univariate analysis, OS was associated with extent of disease (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab (P = 0.021), completeness of cytoreduction (CC) (P < 0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.04), but not with primary disease site, synchronous presentation, or chemoperfusion drug. In multivariate Cox regression, independent predictors of OS were CC (hazard ratio 0.29, P < 0.001) and neoadjuvant therapy containing bevacizumab (hazard ratio 0.31, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS Long-term OS after CRS and HIPEC for colorectal cancer is associated with CC and neoadjuvant therapy containing bevacizumab. This regimen merits prospective study in patients with resectable PC of colorectal origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Ceelen
- Department of Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Connor AA, Burkes R, Gallinger S. Strategies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Synchronous Colorectal Cancer and Resectable Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-014-0222-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
39
|
Liver metastases from primary rectal cancer: a multidisciplinary reverse approach. J Gastrointest Cancer 2014; 44:368-9. [PMID: 23054581 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-012-9444-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
40
|
Martin LK, Bekaii-Saab T. Controversies in Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. COLORECTAL CANCER 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118337929.ch14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
41
|
Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Wound Healing and Tissue Repair: Implications for Surgery in Cancer Patients. Drug Saf 2014; 37:135-49. [DOI: 10.1007/s40264-014-0139-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
42
|
Köpke T, Bierer S, Wülfing C, Tiemann A, Hertle L, Herrmann E. Multimodality treatment paradigms for renal cell carcinoma: surgery versus targeted agents. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 9:763-71. [DOI: 10.1586/era.09.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
43
|
Timsit MO, Albiges L, Méjean A, Escudier B. Neoadjuvant treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma: current situation and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 12:1559-69. [DOI: 10.1586/era.12.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
44
|
Morine Y, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T. Evaluation and management of hepatic injury induced by oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatol Res 2014; 44:59-69. [PMID: 23551330 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2013] [Revised: 02/19/2013] [Accepted: 02/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) can be cured with surgical resection. Recent advances in systemic chemotherapy, including molecular target agents, can be used to introduce "conversion surgery" and achieve R0 resection even in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy also tries to be applied in patients with resectable CRLM to maximize the remnant liver and reduce the residual micrometastasis before surgery. The development of chemotherapy-induced hepatic injuries is increasingly being recognized, including sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS), steatosis, steatohepatitis and biliary sclerosis. Especially, oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapy in clinical settings appears to be primarily associated with SOS. Various reports have tried to demonstrate the rationale of the correlation between L-OHP-based chemotherapy and SOS for the following hepatic surgery. While we can recognize that this pathophysiological disadvantage leads to hepatic dysfunction and the increasing postoperative morbidity, the essential part of this problem including clinical disadvantage, onset mechanism, evaluation systems, and targeted agents for prevention and treatment of SOS continue to be unclear. In this review, we summarize the current experience with hepatic injury induced by L-OHP-based chemotherapy, focusing on SOS-based on clinical and experimental data, in order to assist in the resolution of these identified factors. Finally, the need for reliable methods to identify the risk of SOS, to evaluate SOS status and to predict the safety of surgical treatment in patients with chemotherapy prior to surgery will be emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Morine
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Imai K, Emi Y, Iyama KI, Beppu T, Ogata Y, Kakeji Y, Samura H, Oki E, Akagi Y, Maehara Y, Baba H. Splenic volume may be a useful indicator of the protective effect of bevacizumab against oxaliplatin-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 40:559-566. [PMID: 24388740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2013] [Revised: 11/29/2013] [Accepted: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the use of bevacizumab (Bmab) in addition to oxaliplatin (OX), the development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and the changes in splenic volume as an indicator of the protective effect of Bmab against OX-induced SOS. METHODS Seventy-nine patients who received OX-based chemotherapy with (OX + Bmab group: n = 48) or without Bmab (OX group: n = 31) for colorectal liver metastases were included in this study. The changes in splenic volume after chemotherapy were evaluated in the two groups. Furthermore, the relationship between the changes in splenic volume and SOS were analyzed in the 55 patients who underwent hepatectomy. RESULTS A significant increase in the splenic volume was observed in the OX group, but not in the OX + Bmab group. The increase in the splenic volume relative to baseline was significantly higher in the OX group than in the OX + Bmab group (39.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.0001). The incidence of moderate or severe SOS was significantly higher in the OX group than in the OX + Bmab group (50.0% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.0068), and the increase in the splenic volume was significantly higher in the patients with SOS than in those without SOS (42.9% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.0001). A multivariate analysis identified the increase in the splenic volume as an independent predictor of the development of SOS. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the inhibition of splenic volume enlargement might be a useful indicator of the protective effect of Bmab against OX-induced SOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Y Emi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - K-I Iyama
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - T Beppu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Y Ogata
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University Medical Center, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Kakeji
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - H Samura
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - E Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Y Akagi
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Maehara
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - H Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Eveno C, Passot G, Goéré D, Soyer P, Gayat E, Glehen O, Elias D, Pocard M. Bevacizumab doubles the early postoperative complication rate after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:1792-800. [PMID: 24337648 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3442-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis are increasingly treated with curative intent and perioperative systemic chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential impact of bevacizumab on early morbidity after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. METHODS From 2004 to 2010, in three referral centers, 182 patients with colorectal carcinomatosis were treated with complete cytoreduction followed by HIPEC after either preoperative systemic chemotherapy alone or in combination with bevacizumab. Because there was no control on treatment allocation, propensity score methods were used to control for this bias. RESULTS The median time from discontinuation of bevacizumab to HIPEC was 7 weeks (range 6-10 weeks). Major morbidity was greater in the bevacizumab group (34 vs. 19 %, p = 0.020). Nine patients died postoperatively, 5 (6.2 %) in the bevacizumab group (n = 80) and 4 (3.9 %) in the group treated with chemotherapy alone (n = 102) (p = 0.130). The rate of digestive fistulas was greater in the bevacizumab group, although not statistically significant (18 vs. 10 %, p = 0.300). The effect of bevacizumab on major morbidity (including death) was found to be statistically significant (odds ratio 2.28, 95 % confidence interval 1.05-4.95) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Administration of bevacizumab before surgery with complete cytoreduction followed by HIPEC for colorectal carcinomatosis is associated with twofold increased morbidity. The oncologic benefit of bevacizumab before HIPEC remains to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive Disease, Hôpital Lariboisière-AP-HP & Université Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reissfelder C, Brand K, Sobiegalla J, Rahbari NN, Bork U, Schirmacher P, Büchler MW, Weitz J, Koch M. Chemotherapy-associated liver injury and its influence on outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2013; 155:245-54. [PMID: 24314883 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in neoadjuvant therapy enabled novel strategies for treating resectable and initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Although it is well known that chemotherapeutic agents cause certain types of liver parenchymal injury, the actual contribution of chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity to postoperative morbidity remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to define all kinds of chemotherapy-associated liver injury and to examine its impact on postoperative morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 119 patients who were treated between 2002 and 2010. Chemotherapy-associated changes of the liver were subclassified in 11 different categories and correlated with postoperative morbidity with the ultimate aim of generating a liver injury risk score. RESULTS On univariate analysis severity (P = .004) and localization of parenchymal inflammation (P = .04) were associated with morbidity. Steatosis did not correlate with postoperative outcome (P = .69), whereas steatohepatitis (as assessed by the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score score) was related with morbidity (P = .03). On multivariate analysis, the severity of inflammation (95% confidence interval, 1.008-6.526; odds ratio, 2.56; P = .04) was significantly correlated with postoperative morbidity. The newly developed liver injury risk score was highly associated with postoperative complications (P = .006). CONCLUSION In this study, the induction of inflammation by conventional chemotherapy and its relevance for the development of clinical complications could be demonstrated. The proposed risk score for liver injury-related morbidity might help to better select patients eligible for an operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Karsten Brand
- Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Sobiegalla
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bork
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Moritz Koch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dellas K, Buller J, Görtz GJ, Richter M, Höhler T, Arnold D, Keck T, Dunst J, Zühlke H. Analysis of bevacizumab-based preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on surgery-associated spectrum of complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:1352-60. [PMID: 24306667 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3412-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC; stages II and III). Results of our phase II study (BevXelOx-RT) have shown that this regimen is feasible but without a significant improvement of pathological complete response. Whether preoperatively administered bevacizumab, due to its specific toxicity profile, leads to increased rates of surgical complications is currently a subject for debate. This analysis focusses on the surgery-associated spectrum of complications. METHODS Data from 62 patients with rectal cancer (uT3-4; N0/1, M0) of the phase II trial were analyzed. Patients received radiotherapy (50.4/1.8 Gy fractions), simultaneous bevacizumab 5 mg/kg (d1, d15, d29), and capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily (d1-14, d22-35), oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) (d1, d8, d22, d29). Four to six weeks after RCT, surgical resection was performed. RESULTS Overall, 69/69 patients underwent surgery, and 66 (95.7 %) patients had R0 resection. Surgery was mainly conducted (in 66 %) by highly experienced surgeons (>20 resections of rectal cancer/year) with differences between the institutions due to the operative procedures but without effects on the rate of R0 resection or complications. The average duration of surgery was 239 min (±10). Frequency of multivisceral resections (11 %), intraoperative (8 %) and postoperative (43 %) complications were all in the expected range. In particular, we did not observe an increased rate of postoperative bleedings (3 %). The postoperative mortality rate was 0 %. CONCLUSIONS Quantity and the kind of surgery-associated spectrum of complications followed by a preoperative bevacizumab-containing RCT regimen in patients with LARC were in line with comparable trials of bevacizumab-based approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Dellas
- Department of Radiooncology Kiel/Luebeck, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hubert C, Sempoux C, Humblet Y, van den Eynde M, Zech F, Leclercq I, Gigot JF. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) related to chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: factors predictive of severe SOS lesions and protective effect of bevacizumab. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15:858-64. [PMID: 23458554 PMCID: PMC4503283 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2012] [Accepted: 12/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The most frequent presentation of chemotherapy-related toxicity in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). The purpose of the present study was to identify preoperative factors predictive of SOS and to establish associations between type of chemotherapy and severity of SOS. METHODS A retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary academic referral hospital. Patients suffering from CRLM who had undergone resection of at least one liver segment were included. Grading of SOS on the non-tumoral liver parenchyma was accomplished according to the Rubbia-Brandt criteria. A total of 151 patients were enrolled and divided into four groups according to the severity of SOS (grades 0-3). RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil as chemotherapeutic agents responsible for severe SOS lesions (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). Bevacizumab was identified as having a protective effect against the occurrence of SOS lesions (P = 0.005). Univariate analysis identified the score on the aspartate aminotransferase : platelets ratio index (APRI) as the most significant biological factor predictive of severe SOS lesions. Splenomegaly is also significantly associated with the occurrence of severe SOS lesions. CONCLUSIONS The APRI score and splenomegaly are effective as factors predictive of SOS. Bevacizumab has a protective effect against SOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Hubert
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Sempoux
- Department of Pathology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Yves Humblet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Marc van den Eynde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Francis Zech
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Leclercq
- Laboratory of Hepatogastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-François Gigot
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de LouvainBrussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vibert E, Pittau G, Gelli M, Cunha AS, Jamot L, Faivre J, Castro Benitez C, Castaing D, Adam R. Actual incidence and long-term consequences of posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2013; 155:94-105. [PMID: 24694360 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Accepted: 05/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a severe complication after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. This study evaluated its actual incidence and its effects on short- and long-term overall survival (OS) in a specialized center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2006 and 2008, 193 patients who underwent 232 hepatectomies (147 minor and 85 major) for colorectal liver metastasis were studied prospectively. Hepatectomy was performed if the remnant liver volume was >0.5% of body weight. Uni- and multivariate analyses on OS after all hepatectomies (n = 232) or major resection only (n = 85) were then performed on pre-, intra-, and postoperative (including pathological) data to determine the consequences of PHLF by comparison with those of other intra- and postoperative events. RESULTS The 3-month postoperative mortality rate was 0.8%. PHLF was observed in six patients (7%) after major hepatectomy and in one (0.6%) after minor hepatectomy. With a 25-month follow-up, the 2-year OS rate was 84%. Preoperatively, pulmonary metastasis was the only determinant of OS. Intra- and postoperatively, four factors were determinant of OS: PHLF (risk ratio [RR] = 3.84, P = .04), mental confusion (RR = 3.11, P = .006), fluid collection (RR = 2.9, P = .01) and transfusion (RR = 2.27, P = .009). After major hepatectomy, only PHLF (RR = 4.14, P = .01) and confusion (RR = 3.6, P = .02) were identified. CONCLUSION With improvements in postoperative management, PHLF was found to be less responsible for 3-month mortality but remains an event that exerts a major impact on 2-year survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Vibert
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Unité 785, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
| | - Gabriella Pittau
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Antonio Sa Cunha
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Unité 785, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Jamila Faivre
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Unité 785, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Denis Castaing
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Inserm, Unité 785, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|