Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Long Road to Cure

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains an important cause of cancer-related mortality, and it is expected to play an even bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Despite concerted efforts from scientists and physicians, patients have experienced little improvement in survival over the past decades, possibly because of the non-specific nature of the tested treatment modalities. Recently, the discovery of potentially targetable molecular alterations has paved the way for the personalized treatment of PDAC. Indeed, the central piece in the molecular framework of PDAC is starting to be unveiled. KRAS mutations are seen in 90% of PDACs, and multiple studies have demonstrated their pivotal role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Recent investigations have shed light on the differences in prognosis as well as therapeutic implications of the different KRAS mutations and disentangled the relationship between KRAS and effectors of downstream and parallel signaling pathways. Additionally, the recognition of other mechanisms involving KRAS-mediated pathogenesis, such as KRAS dosing and allelic imbalance, has contributed to broadening the current knowledge regarding this molecular alteration. Finally, KRAS G12C inhibitors have been recently tested in patients with pancreatic cancer with relative success, and inhibitors of KRAS harboring other mutations are under clinical development. These drugs currently represent a true hope for a meaningful leap forward in this dreadful disease.

Risk of Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pitfalls in Oncologic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), represented by ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is an idiopathic condition caused by a dysregulated immune response to host intestinal microflora, leading to chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation. Individuals with IBD are more prone to die from several diseases, including cancer.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted of PubMed using the following medical subject heading-"inflammatory bowel disease" OR "Crohn's disease" OR "ulcerative colitis" AND "cancer."

RESULTS

In this review article, we discuss the oncogenic mechanisms and genomics of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Beyond this, we describe the multiple other malignancies that IBD patients are at risk for, discuss caveats in the screening and diagnosis of those cancers, and shed light on pitfalls on the management and treatment of cancer in IBD patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients, caregivers, and health professionals who deal with IBD must be educated on how to identify warning signs so that cancers can be diagnosed and treated as early as possible.

Minimal Residual Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Are We Finding the Needle in a Haystack?

Despite significant advances in the surgical and systemic therapy of colorectal cancer (CRC) in recent decades, recurrence rates remain high. Apart from microsatellite instability status, the decision to offer adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with CRC is solely based on clinicopathologic factors, which offer an inaccurate risk stratification of patients who derive benefit from adjuvant therapy. Owing to the recent improvements of molecular techniques, it has been possible to detect small allelic fractions of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and therefore, to identify patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative-intent therapies. The incorporation of ctDNA identifying MRD in clinical practice may dramatically change the standard of care of CRC, refining the selection of patients who are candidates for escalation and de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy, and even for organ-preservation strategies in rectal cancer. In the present review, we describe the current standard of care and the DNA sequencing methodologies and assays, present the data from completed clinical studies and list ongoing potential landmark clinical trials whose results are eagerly awaited, as well as the impact and perspectives for the near future. The discussed data bring optimism for the future of oncologic care through the hope of refined utilization of adjuvant therapies with higher efficacy and safety for patients with both localized and advanced CRC.

Triplets versus doublets in the treatment of right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world setting: A propensity-score weighting analysis

55

Background: Right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a worse prognosis and the best first-line treatment is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing triplet versus doublet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated in a private institution in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Information of 118 patients with right-sided primary tumor was analyzed in this study. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. PFS and OS were calculated in months (m) using propensity-score weighting analysis (PSWA) due to expected disparity between the number of patients treated with triplet and doublet regimens. Variables used to balance patient groups were age; metastasectomy; primary tumor resection; bevacizumab use; BRAF and RAS mutation status. Results: The median follow-up was 31 months. Our population was mostly composed of elderly (64%) and female (52%) patients. First-line treatment with triplet backbone chemotherapy was done in 16 patients (14%). Primary tumor resection was done in 14% of the cases, 55% underwent metastasectomy, and 57% received anti-VEGF treatment. BRAF mutation was found in 9% of the patients and RAS mutation in 46%. After PSWA we found a significant better median PFS among patients treated with triplet regimen: 12.7m versus 8.9m compared to those receiving doublet backbone chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (CI 95%: 0.42 – 0.97); p-value: 0.037. No significant difference was found in OS (29.8m versus 45.5m) between triplet and doublet therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions: In our study we found a significantly better PFS with triplet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC, encouraging the use of this regimen in treatment-naive selected patients. However, no difference in OS was found, probably due to subsequent treatments. PSWA is an acceptable and needed tool to enable retrospective real world studies involving treatments with expected uneven distribution. More studies are needed to answer the best strategy to target right-sided mCRC, which remains a challenge for oncologists, with unmet needs.

Identification and external validation of clinical-molecular features to predict benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction/rechallenge in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

153

Background: Oxaliplatin is a backbone cytotoxic treatment for mCRC patients, particularly in the front-line setting. In the refractory disease, current treatment options are scarce and with limited efficacy. Several retrospective studies have explored the efficacy of oxaliplatin reintroduction/rechallenge (OxRe) in this scenario. However, more evidence is still needed to determine which patients do benefit from this treatment strategy. Methods: The discovery cohort includes all patients treated with oxaliplatin in a third- or fourth-line setting at VHIO between 2015 and 2021 (N = 102). Results were externally validated in a real-world cohort of patients treated at community oncology practices from Oncoclínicas Group in Brazil (N = 157). We analyzed the impact of clinical-molecular features in uni- and multivariable prognostic models in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) (discovery cohort) and median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) (validation cohort). For both cohorts separately, data was extracted from EHRs in structured formats (demographics, tumor characteristics, pharmacy records) and combined with elements from unstructured sources (physician notes on progression and survival status) using technology-based abstraction techniques. Results: In the discovery cohort, 102 out of 735 mCRC patients (13,9%) were eligible. Median oxaliplatin-free interval (from Oxl stop to OxRe) was 17 months (CI95% 13.0-23.2). In OxRe setting, mPFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 3.29-5.03). In PFS multivariate analysis, determinants of favorable outcome were left tumor location (p = 0.01), oxaliplatin-free interval (p = 0.03), administration of Bev in refractory setting (p = 0.001), and not receiving Bev in first-line treatment (p = 0.008). Overall, 27% of all patients had a mPFS > 6 months with OxRe. In the validation cohort, out of 4,317 patients with mCRC, 157 (4%) were treated with OxRe. Median oxaliplatin-free interval was 15 months. Median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) of the OxRe was 3.4 months (CI95% 2.8-4.2). In multivariable model, the only independent prognostic factor was addition of Bev to OxRe (p = 0.036). Interestingly, 31% of all patients had mTTD > 6 months, largely enriched (65%) in patients with first Bev exposure at the time of OxRe. Conclusions: This study suggests that in refractory mCRC patients re-exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, the addition of Bev is associated with improved outcomes. One-third of the patients are long-term responders (PFS/TTD > 6 months), reinforcing the value of this strategy in selected populations and the relevance of anti-angiogenic agents in refractory mCRC.

Biomarkers in Anal Cancer: Current Status in Diagnosis, Disease Progression and Therapeutic Strategies

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is a rare neoplasm, but with rising incidence rates in the past few decades; it is etiologically linked with the human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and is especially prevalent in immunocompromised patients, mainly those infected with HIV. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy remains the cornerstone of the treatment of non-metastatic disease, but the locally advanced disease still presents high rates of disease recurrence and systemic therapy of SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Despite sharing common molecular aspects with other HPV-related malignancies, such as cervical and head and neck cancers, SCCA presents specific epigenomic, genomic, and transcriptomic abnormalities, which suggest that genome-guided personalized therapies should be specifically designed for this disease. Actionable mutations are rare in SCCA and immune checkpoint inhibition has not yet been proven useful in an unselected population of patients. Therefore, advances in systemic therapy of SCCA will only be possible with the identification of predictive biomarkers and the subsequent development of targeted therapies or immunotherapeutic approaches that consider the unique tumor microenvironment and the intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In the present review, we address the molecular characterization of SCCA and discuss potential diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers of this complex and challenging disease.

Biologics in rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite the use of multimodality therapy, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) still presents high rates of disease recurrence. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) remains the cornerstone of neoadjuvant therapy of LARC, and novel therapies are urgently needed in order to improve the clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to summarize data from completed and ongoing clinical trials addressing the role of biological therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and gene therapies in the systemic therapy of rectal cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Deeper understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has allowed meaningful advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic disease in the past few years. The larger applicability of biological therapy in CRC, including genome-guided targeted therapy, antiangiogenics, and immunotherapy, gives us optimism for the personalized management of rectal cancer. Microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors have demonstrated high sensitivity to ICIs, and preliminary findings in the neoadjuvant setting of rectal cancer are promising. To date, antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies in LARC have not demonstrated the same benefit seen in metastatic disease. The outstanding results accomplished by biomarker-guided therapy in metastatic CRC will guide future developments of biological therapy in LARC.

Anal Cancer: Emerging Standards in a Rare Rare Disease

The social stigma surrounding an anal cancer diagnosis has traditionally prevented open discussions about this disease. However, as recent treatment options and an increasing rate of diagnoses are made worldwide, awareness is growing. In the United States alone, 9,090 individuals were expected to be diagnosed with anal cancer in 2021. The US annual incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus continues to increase by 2.7% yearly, whereas the mortality rate increases by 3.1%. The main risk factor for anal cancer is a human papillomavirus infection; those with chronic immunosuppression are also at risk. Patients with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop anal cancer compared with the general population. In this review, we have provided an overview of the carcinoma of the anal canal, the role of screening, advancements in radiation therapy, and current trials investigating acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities. This article is a comprehensive approach to presenting the existing data in an effort to encourage continuous international interest in anal cancer.

Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in third-line and beyond systemic therapy: Real-world data from a setting with limited resources

58

Background: Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) are the only therapeutic options for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with demonstrated benefit in overall survival (OS). However, they are not accessible worldwide. In Brazil, they have been recently approved, but they have not yet been provided by public health system or private health insurances. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of that population in a setting with limited access to those drugs. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated at five Oncoclinicas centers in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The median OS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were evaluated via multivariable Cox Regression, calculating the Hazard Ratio (HR) and the confidence interval (CI95%). Results: A total of 163 patients (33% of the overall population) received third-line and 73 (15%) fourth-line systemic therapy. Median age was 62 years, 59% were male. Tumors were right-sided in 19%, RAS mutated 44%, BRAF mutated 3%, and high-frequency microsatellite instability 3%. Metastasectomy prior to third-line was performed in 62% of the patients. From the start of third-line therapy, median follow-up was 9.0 months, with 67% of deaths, and median OS was 13.7 months (CI95% 11.8m–20.0m). Most adopted regimens in third-and fourth-line were (1) rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy (39% and 26%, respectively); (2) rechallenge with irinotecan-based therapy (32% and 34%); (3) rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (20% and 29%); (4) regorafenib (13% and 25%); and (5) TAS-102 (2% and 4%). In multivariable model including clinical and molecular variables, prior metastasectomy was the only significant prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.51, CI95% 0.31–0.83, p=0.007). Conclusions: In real-world, a meaningful proportion of patients with mCRC are eligible for third and later lines of therapy. Rechallenge with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR agents is overused in a setting of limited access to therapies with demonstrated OS benefit, such as regorafenib and TAS-102. Barriers to drug access impair the adoption of the best evidence-based continuum of care and strategies to overcome them are urgently needed. Refractory patients in later lines of therapy derive survival benefit from prior metastasectomy.

A comprehensive framework for early-onset colorectal cancer research

Sporadic colorectal cancer has traditionally been viewed as a malignancy of older individuals. However, as the global prevalence of the disease diagnosed in younger individuals (<50 years) is expected to increase within the next decade, greater recognition is now being given to early-onset colorectal cancer. The cause of the predicted rise in prevalence is largely unknown and probably multifactorial. In this Series paper, we discuss the potential underlying causes of early-onset colorectal cancer, the role of energy balance, biological and genomic mechanisms (including microbiome aspects), and the treatment of early-onset colorectal cancer. We have specifically considered the psychosocial challenges of being diagnosed with colorectal cancer at younger age and the potential financial toxicity that might ensue. This Series paper brings a comprehensive review based on the existing data in the hopes of optimising the overall outcomes for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer.

Efficacy and Safety Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded conflicting results in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The overall effect of ICIs compared with standard therapies in unresectable HCC requires more research.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the efficacy and safety associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies in patients with unresectable HCC.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting proceedings were systematically searched. Reference lists from studies selected by electronic searching were manually searched to identify additional relevant studies. The search included literature published or presented from February 2010 to February 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

From December 2019 to February 2020, independent reviewers evaluated each database, scanning the title, abstract, and keywords of every record retrieved. Full articles were further assessed if the information given suggested that the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing ICIs vs standard therapies in the treatment of unresectable HCC.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The full text of the resulting studies and extracted data were reviewed independently according to PRISMA guidelines. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by a random-effects model. The likelihood of ICIs being associated with overall response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was expressed by odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR, and TRAEs.

RESULTS

Of 1836 studies yielded by the search, 3 were retained, totaling 1657 patients (985 treated with ICIs vs 672 receiving standard treatment). Two studies evaluated ICIs as monotherapy, and 1 study investigated the combination of ICIs with bevacizumab. Compared with standard therapies (sorafenib in first-line therapy or placebo in second-line therapy), ICIs were associated with significantly improved OS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .006), PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97; P = .03), and ORR (OR, 2.82; 95% CI 2.02-3.93; P < .001). The probability of grade 3 or 4 TRAEs was lower with ICIs than with sorafenib (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.96; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found superior efficacy and safety associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies and highlights the survival benefit associated with the combination of antiangiogenic therapy with ICIs in first-line systemic therapy of unresectable HCC.

Effect of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy on Pathologic Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer is a potentially curable disease. Pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the overall effect of bevacizumab on pR in preoperative systemic therapy for CLM.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and LILACS for studies published between January 2004 and August 2019 that compared the pR of CT plus bevacizumab to CT alone as preoperative therapy for CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were pathologic major (pMaR) and minor (pMiR) response. Overall effects were expressed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 1,452 studies yielded by the search, 9 were eligible, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab and 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate without reaching statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.92, P = .32). However, pMaR was significantly higher (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.25, P < .001), and pMiR was significantly lower (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54, P < .001), in the bevacizumab group. The analyses showed a low level of heterogeneity (I² = 0% to 6%). Publication bias was not found.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that bevacizumab plus preoperative CT is associated with higher rates of pR in CLM. Antiangiogenics might improve the OS of CLM patients and should be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

MICROABSTRACT

The benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is uncertain, but pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor. Our meta-analysis of observational studies compared the pR of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone as preoperative systemic therapy in the management of CLM. The addition of bevacizumab was associated with significantly higher rates of pR.

Predictors of home death and the quality of end-of-life care at a cancer center in Brazil

e24004

Background: Early palliative care has shown an improvement in the quality of life of cancer patients by reducing overtreatment at the end of life and improving symptomatic control. Little is known about the quality of death in developing countries. End-of-life cancer care varies widely, and very few centers evaluate it systematically. The aim of the present study is to analyze the impact of follow-up of cancer patients by an outpatient palliative care team (OPCT) on the end-of-life outcomes at a Cancer Center in Brazil. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved data from electronic medical records of cancer patients who were treated at a Cancer Center in Brazil and who died from cancer or associated complications during the year of 2020. They were divided into two groups: OPCT and No-OPCT. OPCT group was followed-up by a multidisciplinary team composed of physician, nurse, physiotherapist, psychologist, nutritionist, social worker, speech-language therapist, and pharmacist, who regularly evaluated cancer patients during their treatments at outpatient setting. During COVID-19 pandemic, some patients were evaluated by telemedicine appointments. No-OPCT group was followed-up by cancer physicians exclusively. We performed univariate comparisons and multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model. p < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: A total of 315 patients were included in the study: OPCT (N=122) and No-OPCT (N=193). The groups were well balanced in relation to median age (61yo vs 63yo), gender (women: 51% vs 54%), and TNM stage (stage IV: 69% vs 65%). Gastrointestinal and breast cancers were the most prevalent. The rate of home death was 44% in the OPCT group, compared to 16% in the No-OPCT group (p<0.001). The rate of admission in intensive care unit in the last 30 days of life (ICU30) was 13% vs 10%, respectively (p=0.413). Likewise, the rate of patients treated with chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life (CT30) was 42% vs 51% (p=0.146). In multivariate analysis, follow-up by the OPCT was the strongest independent predictor of home death (Table). In contrast, ICU30 and CT30 were inversely correlated with this outcome. Age, gender, and TNM stage did not have influence on the place of death. Conclusions: Follow-up by an OPCT had a strong positive impact on end-of-life care of cancer patients in a country which does not have Hospice culture. The OPCT was able to offer home death to a greater number of patients, with proximity to caregivers, and respect to their beliefs and values. Our data highlight the importance of early conversations about goals of care, prognostic awareness, and end-of-life preferences, while also reinforcing the need of early referral to a palliative care team.[Table: see text]

Machine learning prediction of COVID-19 mortality in cancer patients

1558

Background: COVID-19 is a challenge for clinical decision-making in cancer patients and the allocation of healthcare resources. An accurate prognosis prediction to effectively triage patients is needed, especially in the community oncology practice. Methods:Nationwide cohort from Oncoclínicas Brazil was used to validate previously developed multivariable logistic regression (mLR) model (Ferrari et al, JCO GO 2021) and to construct a machine learning Random Forest (RF) algorithm as predictor of 30-day mortality after SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR in cancer patients diagnosed in an outpatient setting. To find the most important baseline clinical determinants of early COVID-19-related death via Gini index, a RF with 100,000 trees was trained in 75% of the dataset, and the performance was assessed in the remaining 25%. We then compared the accuracy of different models in terms of sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Results:From March to December 2020, 533 patients with COVID-19 were prospectively registered in the database. Median age was 60 years (19-93) and 67% were female. Most frequent cancers were breast in 34%, hematological in 16%, and gastrointestinal in 15%. Comorbidities were common (52%), as was current/former smoking history (17%). Most patients were on active systemic therapy or radiotherapy (84%) in the advanced or metastatic disease setting (55%). The overall mortality rate was 15% (CI95% 12%-18%). We validated the original mLR model trained in the first 198 patients: management in a non-curative setting (odds ratio [OR] 3.7), age ≥ 60 years (OR 2.3), and current/former smoking (OR 1.9) were significant predictors of death in the expanded cohort. Presence of comorbidities (OR 1.9) also defined poor outcome in the updated mLR model, which yielded low sensitivity (74%), specificity (68%) and AUC (0.78). With RF modeling, the most significant predictors of 30-day death after COVID-19 (in decreasing order) were older age, treatment of advanced or metastatic disease, tumor type (respiratory tract, brain and unknown primary cancers had higher mortality), COVID-related symptom burden at baseline evaluation and treatment regimen (immunotherapy combinations had higher mortality). The RF model demonstrated high sensitivity (89%), specificity (88%) and AUC (0.96). Conclusions:The results highlight the possibility that machine learning algorithms are able to predict early mortality after COVID-19 in cancer patients with high accuracy. The proposed prediction model may be helpful in the prompt identification of high-risk patients based on clinical features alone, without having to wait for the results of additional tests such as laboratory or radiologic studies. It can also help prioritize medical resources and redefine vaccination strategies. A web-based mortality risk calculator will be created for clinical decision support.

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Survival in Cancer of Unknown Primary

PURPOSE

Prognostic uncertainty is a major challenge for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Current models limit a meaningful patient-provider dialogue. We aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in CUP based on robust clinicopathologic prognostic factors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We evaluated 521 patients with CUP at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX; 2012-2016). Baseline variables were analyzed using Cox regression and nomogram developed using significant predictors. Predictive accuracy and discriminatory performance were assessed by calibration curves, concordance probability estimate (CPE ± SE), and concordance statistic (C-index). The model was subjected to bootstrapping and multi-institutional external validations using two independent CUP cohorts: V1 [MDACC (2017), N = 103] and V2 (BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada and Sarah Cannon Cancer Center/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; N = 302).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of entire cohort (N = 926) included: median age (63 years), women (51%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 (64%), adenocarcinomas (52%), ≥3 sites of metastases (30%), and median follow-up duration and OS of 40.1 and 14.7 months, respectively. Five independent prognostic factors were identified: gender, ECOG PS, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The resulting model predicted OS with CPE of 0.69 [SE: ± 0.01; C-index: 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.74)] outperforming Culine/Seve prognostic models (CPE: 0.59 ± 0.01). CPE for external validation cohorts V1 and V2 were 0.67 (± 0.02) and 0.70 (± 0.01), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-year OS showed strong agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observations in all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our user-friendly CUP nomogram integrating commonly available baseline factors provides robust personalized prognostication which can aid clinical decision making and selection/stratification for clinical trials.

Emerging and Experimental Agents for Anal Cancer: What is New?

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is an HPV-related malignancy with rising incidence in the past few decades in the US, characterized by high rates of complete response to chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. However, in a long-term follow-up, a meaningful subgroup of patients with locally advanced disease presents disease recurrence, which demands treatments with high morbidity and important impact in the quality of life. In metastatic or unresectable disease, palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care, but it is still associated with a dismal prognosis. Novel agents are urgently needed in the systemic therapy of SCCA. From a translational standpoint, there are many hurdles to overcome, since PI3KCA mutation is the most frequent genetic abnormality and actionable mutations are rarely found in SCCA, as well as it is characterized by low tumor mutational burden and low rates of high-frequency microsatellite instability. But the latest studies of immunotherapeutic approaches have produced promising findings and this therapeutic strategy is the major path being followed in the ongoing clinical trials. The latest advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA have provided the framework for the conception of new clinical trials. Therefore, carboplatin plus paclitaxel have become the backbone for novel agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), mainly anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, such as retifanlimab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have been studied in Phase III trials with chemotherapy in first-line therapy. Likewise, ICIs have been evaluated in locally advanced and refractory disease. Novel technologies, such as bispecific antibodies, and immunotherapeutic approaches, such as vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies, have also been tested in ongoing clinical trials. Immunotherapy may bring practice-changing advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA in the next few years and it might play a larger role in the therapeutic management of this challenging disease.

Determinants of COVID-19 Mortality in Patients With Cancer From a Community Oncology Practice in Brazil

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic remains a public health emergency of global concern. Determinants of mortality in the general population are now clear, but specific data on patients with cancer remain limited, particularly in Latin America.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal multicenter cohort study of patients with cancer and confirmed COVID-19 from Oncoclínicas community oncology practice in Brazil was conducted. The primary end point was all-cause mortality after isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in patients initially diagnosed in an outpatient environment. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis and recursive partitioning modeling to define the baseline clinical determinants of death in the overall population.

RESULTS

From March 29 to July 4, 2020, 198 patients with COVID-19 were prospectively registered in the database, of which 167 (84%) had solid tumors and 31 (16%) had hematologic malignancies. Most patients were on active systemic therapy or radiotherapy (77%), largely for advanced or metastatic disease (64%). The overall mortality rate was 16.7% (95% CI, 11.9 to 22.7). In univariate models, factors associated with death after COVID-19 diagnosis were age ≥ 60 years, current or former smoking, coexisting comorbidities, respiratory tract cancer, and management in a noncurative setting (P < .05). In multivariable logistic regression and recursive partitioning modeling, only age, smoking history, and noncurative disease setting remained significant determinants of mortality, ranging from 1% in cancer survivors under surveillance or (neo)adjuvant therapy to 60% in elderly smokers with advanced or metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Mortality after COVID-19 in patients with cancer is influenced by prognostic factors that also affect outcomes of the general population. Fragile patients and smokers are entitled to active preventive measures to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and close monitoring in the case of exposure or COVID-19-related symptoms.

Integrated clinico-molecular profiling of appendiceal adenocarcinoma reveals a unique grade-driven entity distinct from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is an orphan disease with unique clinical attributes but often treated as colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding key molecular differences between AA and CRC is critical.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analyses of AA patients (N = 266) with tumour and/or blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) (2013-2018) with in-depth clinicopathological annotation. Overall survival (OS) was examined. For comparison, CRC cohorts annotated for sidedness, consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and mutations (N = 3283) were used.

RESULTS

Blood-NGS identified less RAS/GNAS mutations compared to tissue-NGS (4.2% vs. 60.9%, P < 0.0001) and showed poor concordance with tissue for well-/moderately differentiated tumours. RAS (56.2%), GNAS (28.1%) and TP53 (26.9%) were most frequent mutations. Well/moderately differentiated tumours harboured more RAS (69.2%/64.0% vs. 40.5%) and GNAS (48.7%/32.0% vs. 10.1%) while moderate/poorly differentiated tumours had more TP53 (26.0%/27.8% vs. 7.7%) mutations. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (compared to CRC) harboured significantly fewer APC (9.1% vs. 55.4%) and TP53 (26.9% vs. 67.5%) and more GNAS mutations (28.1% vs. 2.0%) (P < 0.0001). Appendiceal adenocarcinoma mutation profile did not resemble either right-sided CRC or any of the four CMS in CRC. High grade, but no mutation, was independently predictive of survival.

CONCLUSION

Integrated clinico-molecular profiling of AA identified key molecular drivers distinct from CRC. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma has a predominantly grade-driven biology that trumps mutations.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs)

e16631

Background: ICIs have ushered a new era in cancer therapy, but their efficacy in HCC is uncertain. Single-arm phase II studies with sorafenib-refractory patients have suggested clinical activity of nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which have become FDA-approved therapies. Nevertheless, the overall effect of ICIs compared with the standard of care (SOC) in unresectable HCC patients is still unknown. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and ASCO and ESMO Meeting Proceedings in the last 10 years for RCTs that have compared the efficacy of ICIs versus the SOC in the systemic therapy of unresectable HCC. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A summary hazard ratio (HR) of OS and PFS was calculated using 95% confidence intervals (CI) by fixed-effects model. The likelihood of ICIs being associated with ORR and TRAEs was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI using a random-effects model (PROSPERO ID 162599). Results: Of the 2,334 studies yielded by the search, 3 studies were retained (KEYNOTE-240, CheckMate-459, and IMbrave150), totaling 1,657 patients (985 ICIs versus 672 SOC). Two studies compared ICIs versus sorafenib in 1st line setting, and one study compared with placebo in 2nd line. The ICIs studied were pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab. RCTs with anti-CTLA4 have not been reported. Two studies evaluated ICIs as monotherapy, and one study investigated the association with bevacizumab. Compared with the SOC (sorafenib in 1st line or placebo in 2nd line), ICIs significantly improved OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 – 0.89, p = 0.0002), PFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 – 0.89, p < 0.0001), and ORR (OR: 2.82, 95% CI 2.02 – 3.93, p < 0.0001). ICIs were associated with a lower probability of grade 3-4 TRAEs when compared to sorafenib (OR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.96, p = 0.04). No significant heterogeneity was found among studies when OS and ORR were analyzed, but it was found in the analysis of PFS and TRAEs. Conclusions: ICIs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety compared to the standard therapy of patients with unresectable HCC. The analysis of ICIs as monotherapy and combination therapy increased the heterogeneity among studies. The association of anti-angiogenic therapy with ICIs improved the survival benefit of immunotherapy and should become the new SOC in the 1st line systemic therapy of unresectable HCC.

Effect of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy on pathologic response to preoperative systemic therapy of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM): A systematic review and meta-analysis

151

Background: Perioperative CT and resection of CLM are potentially curative therapies in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Retrospective studies suggest that preoperative bevacizumab increases pathologic response, which is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis addressing the effect of bevacizumab on pathologic response to preoperative therapy of CLM. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and LILACS from January/2004 to August/2019 for studies that have compared the pathologic response to CT plus bevacizumab versus CT alone as preoperative therapy of potentially resectable CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoint was major response (MaR) (0-50% residual cancer cells or tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-3 in liver specimen). The likelihood of preoperative therapy being associated with pCR or MaR has been expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: Of the 1,319 studies yielded by the search, 9 studies were retained, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab versus 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate, but it did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 – 1.92, p = 0.32). However, MaR was significantly superior in the bevacizumab group (OR: 2.20, 95% CI 1.47 – 3.29, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients have been submitted to oxaliplatin-based regimens in bevacizumab group compared to CT alone group (84% versus 68%, p < 0.001), while irinotecan-based regimens have been more common in the CT alone group (11% versus 28%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of bevacizumab to preoperative CT was associated with higher rates of pathologic response in liver resection of CLM. Anti-angiogenics might potentially improve the recurrence-free survival and OS in the management of potentially resectable CLM and should be evaluated as preoperative therapy in randomized clinical trials.

A Phase II Study of Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal

INTRODUCTION

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) presents a rising incidence in the United States. Standard of care for locally advanced disease is comprised of infusional 5-fluorouracil with mitomycin C or cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy (RT). We designed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a more convenient regimen composed of capecitabine and oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, phase II trial, with treatment-naive stage II to IIIB (TX,1-4NxM0) SCCA patients. The regimen was composed of capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice per day for 5 days) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m² weekly) during weeks 1 through 6, concurrent with RT (XELOX-XRT; group 1). After the first 11 patients, the study was amended to omit chemotherapy during the third and sixth weeks (group 2). The primary objective was 3-year time to treatment failure (TTF) and safety. Secondary objectives were complete response (CR) rate, locoregional control, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. Seven patients of group 1 (63%) developed Grade 3 toxicity, which reduced to 22% in Group 2. No Grade 4 toxicities were noted. The median RT dose was 55 Gy. CR occurred in 100% of the 19 patients evaluable for response at 12 to 14 weeks. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, 2 patients had local recurrence and 1 had distant recurrence. Three-year TTF was 90.0%, with similar rates between groups 1 and 2 (respectively, 90.9% vs. 88.8%, P = .984). Three-year CFS was 90.0%. The median OS has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

The XELOX-XRT regimen is safe, with promising efficacy, and should be explored in larger trials for the treatment of locally advanced SCCA.

Development of a new multimedia instrument to measure cancer-specific quality of life in Portuguese-speaking patients with varying literacy skills

Purpose

To develop and validate a new multimedia instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Portuguese-speaking patients with cancer.

Methods

A mixed-methods study conducted in a large Brazilian Cancer Hospital. The instrument was developed along the following sequential phases: identification of HRQOL issues through qualitative content analysis of individual interviews, evaluation of the most important items according to the patients, review of the literature, evaluation by an expert committee, and pretesting. In sequence, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted (pilot testing, n = 149) to reduce the number of items and to define domains and scores. The psychometric properties of the IQualiV-OG-21 were measured in a large multicentre Brazilian study (n = 323). A software containing multimedia resources were developed to facilitate self-administration of IQualiV-OG-21; its feasibility and patients’ preferences (“paper and pencil” vs. software) were further tested (n = 54).

Results

An exploratory factor analysis reduced the 30-item instrument to 21 items. The IQualiV-OG-21 was divided into 6 domains: emotional, physical, existential, interpersonal relationships, functional and financial. The multicentre study confirmed that it was valid and reliable. The electronic multimedia instrument was easy to complete and acceptable to patients. Regarding preferences, 61.1 % of them preferred the electronic format in comparison with the paper and pencil format.

Conclusions

The IQualiV-OG-21 is a new valid and reliable multimedia HRQOL instrument that is well-understood, even by patients with low literacy skills, and can be answered quickly. It is a useful new tool that can be translated and tested in other cultures and languages.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2675-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.