Epidermal growth factor receptor biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma

Gefitinib: re-emerging from the shadows

SUMMARY In the past decade, the identification of mutations in the EGFR gene and the sensitivity of activating mutations to EGF receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved survival in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Over 70% of patients with EGFR mutations have a response to gefitinib therapy. Gefitinib, a first-generation EGF receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and continues to be widely used. However, eventually most patients develop resistance to gefitinib. This article reviews the pharmacology of gefitinib and summarizes the clinical trials that have resulted in its current day indications.

[Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer]

由于每一肺癌患者在临床特征、预后、治疗反应和耐受性方面的进展都是独特的，所以肺癌被认为是异质性疾病。个体化用药是指运用标志物来预测哪些患者更易获益于某种治疗。对于肺癌而言，日趋完善的表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR)和新发现的棘皮动物微管相关蛋白样4-间变淋巴瘤激酶(echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EML4-ALK)是重要的治疗靶标。本综述包括EGFR和EML4-ALK活化的机制、预测性生物标记物、耐药的机理和已有的靶向性酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。本文将通过总结基于生物标记物筛选患者而进行的前瞻性临床试验来探讨EGFR和ALK靶向治疗的疗效。此外，由于革命性的测序和系统生物学技术会为癌症的分子特征提供一个全面的理解，有助于为更适宜靶向治疗的患者提供更精确的区分从而提供更有前景的个体化治疗，本综述也将包括这些技术。同时，非亚裔人群中EGFR和ALK相对较低的突变发生率和突变患者反应的缺乏限制了靶向于EGFR或ALK的治疗的应用。测序和系统生物学策略则可能为这些患者提供新的解决方案。

Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer has long been recognized as an extremely heterogeneous disease, since its development is unique in every patient in terms of clinical characterizations, prognosis, response and tolerance to treatment. Personalized medicine refers to the use of markers to predict which patient will most likely benefit from a treatment. In lung cancer, the well-developed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the newly emerging EML4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are important therapeutic targets. This review covers the basic mechanism of EGFR and EML4-ALK activation, the predictive biomarkers, the mechanism of resistance, and the current targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The efficacy of EGFR and ALK targeted therapies will be discussed in this review by summarizing the prospective clinical trials, which were performed in biomarker-based selected patients. In addition, the revolutionary sequencing and systems strategies will also be included in this review since these technologies will provide a comprehensive understanding in the molecular characterization of cancer, allow better stratification of patients for the most appropriate targeted therapies, eventually resulting in a more promising personalized treatment. The relatively low incidence of EGFR and ALK in non-Asian patients and the lack of response in mutant patients limit the application of the therapies targeting EGFR or ALK. Nevertheless, it is foreseeable that the sequencing and systems strategies may offer a solution for those patients.

A Phase II trial of erlotinib as maintenance treatment after gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite the efficacy of gemcitabine-platinum regimen, the outcome of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM NPC) is poor. A phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of erlotinib, given as maintenance therapy after gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy in patients with RM NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 as well as cisplatin 70 mg/m on day 1 (or carboplatin area under curve 5 on day 1, if contraindication to cisplatin) 3 weeks. After 6 chemotherapy cycles (or before in case of progression), patients were switched to erlotinib 150 mg/d 4 weeks. Primary end point was time to progression in patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with maintenance erlotinib. Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels, measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

Of 20 enrolled patients, 19 patients received 96 chemotherapy cycles. Fifteen patients were switched to erlotinib and received 36 cycles (range: 1 to 6 cycles). Safety profiles observed with the chemotherapy combination and erlotinib were those expected. Of 12 patients evaluable for response to erlotinib, all progressed except 3 patients (25%) who had stable disease for 3, 4, and 7 months, respectively. Median time to progression was 6.9 months for 13 patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with erlotinib. No correlation was identified between Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels and clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance or second-line therapy with erlotinib after chemotherapy was not effective in RM NPC. Historical comparison with patients treated with the same chemotherapy alone until progression suggests that it may be detrimental to stop chemotherapy after 6 cycles if disease did not progress.

Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen

Background

Recent studies have shown that KRAS mutations are negative predictors of benefit from both adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR directed therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Needle core biopsy, cytology specimen and resected tissue have all been used for KRAS mutational analysis of malignant lung tumors. However, studies validating the correlation between needle core biopsy/cytology specimen and resected tissue, histologic reference standard for KRAS mutational analysis are lacking. We retrospectively compared the KRAS mutation detection on cytology specimen or needle core biopsy with corresponding resected malignant neoplasm of lung, the histologic reference standard for mutational analysis.

Method

Twenty-seven samples including 8 cell blocks, 9 cytology smears and 10 needle core biopsies, and corresponding 22 resected malignant tumor of lung were correlated for KRAS mutational analysis. In cases where cell block material did not correspond with results on resected specimen, cytology smears of corresponding cases were microdissected for isolation of DNA.

Results

The needle core biopsy specimens and the corresponding surgical resections showed 100% concordant results for KRAS mutational analysis. KRAS mutation was detected in 4 out of 8 cell blocks, compared to 7 out of 8 corresponding surgical resections. Low cellularity (2 cases) and failure to retrieve DNA (1case) resulted in lack of correlation in 3 cases with cell blocks. However, cytology smears in these 3 cases confirmed the KRAS mutation noted in corresponding surgical resections. Overall concordance between cytology smears and corresponding surgical resections was 89% (8 of 9 cases). KRAS mutation was detected in 1 of the 9 cytology smears and was lacking in corresponding surgically resection.

Conclusion

Cytology specimen and needle core biopsies provide adequate material for KRAS mutational analysis. Excellent mutational analysis concordance between cytology specimen/needle core biopsies and resected tumor suggests that predictive marker based therapeutic decision need not shift to more invasive surgical procedures.

A phase II trial of erlotinib as front-line treatment in clinically selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib as front-line treatment in clinically selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine previously untreated white patients who had stage IIIB/IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma or bronchoalveolar carcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers were treated with erlotinib 150 mg daily, irrespective of the EGFR mutation status.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate (ORR) was 24.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 61.3%. Among the 36 patients for whom tumor material was available, 9 (25%) had activating EGFR mutations. The ORR was 66.7% in patients with activating EGFR mutations and 14.8% in patients with wild-type EGFR (2P = .006). In patients with activating EGFR mutations, the OS has not been reached, whereas it was 12.9 months in patients with EGFR wild type (2P = .045). Twenty-four patients had a PFS of > 6 months; 11 (45.8%) of them had EGFR wild type and 7 (29.1%) had EGFR mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of patients for treatment with EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) should be based on mutation testing. However use of clinical (smoking status) and pathologic (adenocarcinoma) criteria may identify a subgroup of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who can benefit from front-line treatment with erlotinib when mutation testing is not feasible.

An Evidence-Based Approach to the Use of Predictive Biomarkers in the Treatment of Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Recent advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have led to improvements in patient survival and quality of life. It is unclear whether molecular abnormalities associated with NSCLC cell survival, growth and proliferation are useful in predicting treatment benefit. We conducted a systematic review to establish which biomarkers contribute meaningfully to the management of NSCLC. A team of researchers searched PubMed and conference proceedings (ASCO, ESMO, IASLC, USCAP) using MESH terms for NSCLC and randomized trials (RCT), plus keywords for variables of interest. Evidence from multiple RCTs confirmed that histologic subtype is prognostic for survival and predictive of treatment efficacy and/or toxicity in NSCLC. Likewise, activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are associated with benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC and should be assessed routinely. No biomarkers to date reliably predict response to anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) therapies. There are inconsistent data on the role of ERCC1, BRCA, Beta tubulin III, RRM1, K-RAS, or TP-53 in treatment decisions. These tests should not be routinely used in selecting treatment at this time, whereas EML4/ALK translocations predict responses to specific targeted agents, the optimal assessment of this molecular abnormality has yet to be established. Personalized care of patients with NSCLC based on biomarkers is increasingly important to both clinical practice and research.

The Pharmacogenetic Rescue of Side-Lined Anticancer Drugs to the Front-Line: Gefitinib as a Case Example

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the increasing importance of pharmacogenetics in drug development and clinical practice through a critical analysis of the validation and licensing of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles and the "grey" literature were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (to June 2010) and the Web sites of the major drug regulators. References identified through the reference lists of major published reviews of gefitinib and Erb receptors, including EGFR, were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

A broad appraisal of the titles and abstracts of articles on gefitinib and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer was undertaken to identify pertinent concepts and relevant publications for further analysis. Articles deemed particularly relevant were retrieved for detailed appraisal. Dossiers on the licensing of gefitinib from the Food and Drug Administration Web site and major published reviews were retrieved. Relevant pharmacogenetic issues were identified and the clinical studies addressing these were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Initial promising trial data for gefitinib in NSCLC led to its conditional marketing approval. When the drug's efficacy was not confirmed in a pivotal Phase 3 trial, its prescribing was restricted. Subsequent discovery of activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR led to further retrospective and prospective evaluation of the drug in patients with those mutations. The new evidence was sufficiently robust to persuade the drug regulators to license the drug as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who test positive for those mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacogenetic evidence has played a key role in rescuing gefitinib for front-line treatment of NSCLC. This case-example portends what will be increasingly likely scenarios in the regulation and clinical validation of targeted drug therapies.

Pre-treatment levels of circulating free IGF-1 identify NSCLC patients who derive clinical benefit from figitumumab

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR) antibody figitumumab (F) in unselected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were recently discontinued owing to futility. Here, we investigated a role of free IGF-1 (fIGF-1) as a potential predictive biomarker of clinical benefit from F treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Pre-treatment circulating levels of fIGF-1 were tested in 110 advanced NSCLC patients enrolled in a phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin given alone (PC) or in combination with F at doses of 10 or 20 mg kg(-1) (PCF10, PCF20).

RESULTS

Cox proportional hazards model interactions were between 2.5 and 3.5 for fIGF-1 criteria in the 0.5-0.9 ng ml(-1) range. Patients above each criterion had a substantial improvement in progression-free survival on PCF20 related to PC alone. Free IGF-1 correlated inversely with IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1, ρ=-0.295, P=0.005), and the pre-treatment ratio of insulin to IGFBP-1 was also predictive of F clinical benefit. In addition, fIGF-1 levels correlated with tumour vimentin expression (ρ=0.594, P=0.021) and inversely with E-cadherin (ρ=-0.389, P=0.152), suggesting a role for fIGF-1 in tumour de-differentiation.

CONCLUSION

Free IGF-1 may contribute to the identification of a subset of NSCLC patients who benefit from F therapy.

Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift in the last decade, with the survival advantage demonstrated by the incorporation of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to the standard treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We review the existing data regarding the distinct anti-EGFR agents in the NSCLC treatment and the potential role of the investigated biomarkers in the clinical outcome.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used in first-line, second-line and more settings with extremely good results in a subgroup of patients. Cetuximab remains the only anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody to show survival benefit when combined with a cytotoxic agent in the front-line setting. Anti-EGFR treatment is associated with a dramatic clinical benefit in a subgroup of patients, emphasizing the importance of customizing treatment. Several biomarkers have been investigated for their predictive or prognostic value. Validation of identification of biomarkers remains a focus of intense research that may ultimately guide therapeutic decision making, as none of these is considered ideal to discriminate responding from non-responding patients. However, the current evidence of the EGFR mutation analysis from a recent randomised trial suggests that EGFR mutation analysis is quite a good predictive marker for responsiveness to anti-EGFR TKIs. Moreover, the identification of surrogate markers to indicate optimal activity of the anti-EGFR agent is also needed. This review article provides data from large clinical trials using anti-EGFR agents and correlates these results with the tested biomarkers.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

EGFR inhibition has shown very encouraging results and has improved the outcome of the NSCLC treatment. However, a plateau of significant clinical benefit seems to have been reached and we believe that the time to move away from the traditional treatment approach to more individualizing therapies has come.