Phase II trial of sorafenib combined with concurrent transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma

Combination locoregional and systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Locoregional therapies play a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with early and intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. With encouraging recent advances in immunotherapy-based systemic therapies, locoregional therapies are being both promoted and challenged by new systemic therapy options. Combined locoregional and systemic therapies might enhance treatment outcomes compared with either option alone. This Series paper summarises the existing data on locoregional and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses evidence from studies investigating their combination with a focus on their synergistic efficacy and safety.

Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient's quality of life.

Objectives

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Design

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

Data sources and methods

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

Results

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39-28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89-39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20-53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99-11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

The second-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with CalliSpheres drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with regorafenib: A safety and efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with regorafenib in the second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 34 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that had progressed after first-line treatment in Linyi Tumor Hospital from October 2019 to June 2021. These patients were divided into observation group (n = 15) and control group (n = 19) based on their treatment plans, who were respectively treated with regorafenib alone and regorafenib combined with DEB-TACE. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) were calculated; the factors influencing PFS and OS of patients were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model; and the adverse reactions to the treatments were observed and recorded.

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, the ORR and the DCR of the observation group were 73.3% (11/15) and 86.7% (13/15) respectively, both higher than 10.5% (2/19) and 47.4% (9/19) of the control group. Their differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of regorafenib-related adverse reactions including hand-foot skin reactions, fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, and proteinuria between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the main adverse reactions to DEB-TACE such as fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting were relieved after symptomatic treatment, and no serious complications such as ectopic embolization of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads occurred. As of July 31, 2022, the median follow-up time was 12.5 months, and the average was (14.00 ± 5.69) months. The median PFS was 9 months in the observation group, and 6 months in the control group, presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), and the median OS was 18 months in the observation group, and 12 months in the control group, also presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The results of monofactor prognostic analysis showed that Child grade, AFP level, and treatment method had an influence on the PFS and the OS of liver cancer patients receiving regorafenib second-line treatment (P < 0.05), and the results of multifactor prognostic analysis showed that child grade and treatment method independently influenced the PFS of patients, while treatment method independently influenced the OS of patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE combined with regorafenib is safe and feasible in the treatment of unresectable HCC, with good efficacy and mild adverse reactions.

Prognosis of transarterial chemoembolization-sorafenib compared to transarterial chemoembolization-alone in hepatocellular carcinoma stage C: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aims to compare the prognosis of treatment transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and TACE-alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C (BCLC-C).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus. Studies were included if they compared overall survival (OS) of TACE-Sorafenib to TACE-alone in patients with HCC BCLC-C within the 2019-2023 timeframe. We excluded studies consisting of conference abstracts, letters, editorials, guidelines, case reports, animal studies, trial registries, and unpublished work. The selected articles were evaluated from August 2023 to September 2023. The journal's quality was assessed with NOS for a non-randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

This systematic review included four studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). All four studies compared the OS of 401 patients with TACE-sorafenib to TACE-alone. Two studies compared time-to-progression (TTP), one study compared progression-free survival (PFS), and two studies compared disease control rate (DCR). There were various population criteria, TACE techniques used, risk factors, follow-up time, and adverse events. The collected evidence generally suggested that the combination of TACE-sorafenib is superior compared to TACE-alone. Due to a lack of essential data for the included study, a meta-analysis couldn't be performed.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review suggested that TACE-sorafenib combination therapy in patients with HCC BCLC-C improves OS superior compared to TACE-alone, without a notable increase in adverse events.

The Influence of Additional Treatments on the Survival of Patients Undergoing Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE)

The aim of this study was to present our preliminary experience with transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using Yttrium-90 (90Y), compare the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases undergoing TARE, and investigate the influence of additional treatments on CSS. Our database was interrogated to retrieve patients who had undergone TARE using Yttrium-90 (90Y) glass or resin microspheres. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were employed to conduct survival analysis for the different groups (p < 0.05). Thirty-nine patients were retrieved (sex: 27 M, 12 F; mean age: 63.59 ± 15.66 years): twenty-three with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and sixteen with CRC liver metastasis. Globally, the patients with HCC demonstrated a significantly longer CSS than those with CRC liver metastasis (22.64 ± 2.7 vs. 7.21 ± 1.65 months; p = 0.014). Among the patients with CRC liver metastasis, those receiving TARE and additional concomitant treatments (n = 10) demonstrated a longer CSS than the CRC patients receiving only TARE (9.97 ± 2.21 vs. 2.59 ± 0.24 months; p = 0.06). In the HCC group, there was a trend of a longer CSS in patients (n = 8) receiving TARE and additional treatments (27.89 ± 3.1 vs. 17.69 ± 3.14 months; p = 0.15). Patients with HCC seem to achieve a longer survival after TARE compared to patients with CRC liver metastases. In patients with CRC liver metastases, the combination of TARE and additional concomitant treatments may improve survival.

Recent updates in the use of pharmacological therapies for downstaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer, but only 20-30% of patients benefit from potentially curative treatments such as liver resection or transplantation. This article reviews conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, with a focus on downstaging unresectable tumors to resectable status.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, aiming at downstaging from unresectable to resectable status, are reviewed. Future prospectives of combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors were also introduced by reviewing recent clinical trials, paying attention to the objective response rate as its potential of downstaging treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

The newly developed pharmacological therapies showed higher responses. Although various tumor statuses in advanced HCC hamper detailed analysis of successful conversion rate, the novel combined immunotherapies are expected to provide more opportunities for subsequent curative surgery for initially unresectable advanced HCC. The conversion treatment strategies for unresectable HCC should be separately discussed for 'technically resectable but oncologically unfavorable' HCC and metastatic or invasive HCC beyond curative surgical treatments. The optimal downstaging treatment strategy for advanced HCC is awaited. Elucidation of preoperatively available factors that predict successful downstaging will allow the tailoring of promising initial treatments leading to conversion surgery.

Drug-Eluting Embolic Loaded with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Targeted Therapies for Transarterial Chemoembolization in a VX2 Model

Drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE) improves the overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the agents used are not tailored to HCC. Our patented liposomal formulation enables the loading and elution of targeted therapies onto DEEs. This study aimed to establish the safety, feasibility, and pharmacokinetics of sorafenib or regorafenib DEE-TACE in a VX2 model. DEE-TACE was performed in VX2 hepatic tumors in a selective manner until stasis using liposomal sorafenib- or regorafenib-loaded DEEs. The animals were euthanized at 1, 24, and 72 h timepoints post embolization. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetics at 5 and 20 min and at 1, 24, and 72 h. Measurements of sorafenib or regorafenib were performed in all tissue samples on explanted hepatic tissue using the same mass spectrometry method. Histopathological examinations were carried out on tumor tissues and non-embolized hepatic specimens. DEE-TACE was performed on 23 rabbits. The plasma concentrations of sorafenib and regorafenib were statistically significantly several folds lower than the embolized liver at all examined timepoints. This study demonstrates the feasibility of loading sorafenib or regorafenib onto commercially available DEEs for use in TACE. The drugs eluted locally without release into systemic circulation.

Preoperative sintilimab plus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria: A phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients with HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A exceeding the Milan criteria, or of BCLC stage B, can undergo resection after successful preoperative therapy, but an optimal approach has not been identified. We investigated preoperative drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) plus sintilimab, in this setting.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this prospective, phase II study (NCT04174781), adults with HCC of BCLC stage A exceeding the Milan criteria, or BCLC stage B, and ineligible for surgical resection, received sintilimab 200 mg and DEB-TACE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, pathologic response rate, and safety. At the data cutoff (July 2022), among 60 patients, the objective response rate was 62% (37/60) and 51 patients had undergone surgery. After a median follow-up of 26.0 months (range, 3.4-31.8), the median progression-free survival was 30.5 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). Among patients undergoing surgery, median progression-free survival was not reached and the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 76% (95% CI: 67-91). A pathologic complete response was achieved in 14% (7/51) of these patients. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, but these were generally manageable. Exploratory analyses showed an association between cytokeratin, V-domain Ig-containing Suppressor of T-cell Activation, CD68, CD169, and cluster 13 fibroblasts and recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Sintilimab plus DEB-TACE before surgery showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HCC of BCLC stage A exceeding the Milan criteria or BCLC stage B.

Multifunctional nanoplatforms application in the transcatheter chemoembolization against hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has the sixth-highest new incidence and fourth-highest mortality worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the primary treatment strategies for unresectable HCC. However, the therapeutic effect is still unsatisfactory due to the insufficient distribution of antineoplastic drugs in tumor tissues and the worsened post-embolization tumor microenvironment (TME, e.g., hypoxia and reduced pH). Recently, using nanomaterials as a drug delivery platform for TACE therapy of HCC has been a research hotspot. With the development of nanotechnology, multifunctional nanoplatforms have been developed to embolize the tumor vasculature, creating conditions for improving the distribution and bioavailability of drugs in tumor tissues. Currently, the researchers are focusing on functionalizing nanomaterials to achieve high drug loading efficacy, thorough vascular embolization, tumor targeting, controlled sustained release of drugs, and real-time imaging in the TACE process to facilitate precise embolization and enable therapeutic procedures follow-up imaging of tumor lesions. Herein, we summarized the recent advances and applications of functionalized nanomaterials based on TACE against HCC, believing that developing these functionalized nanoplatforms may be a promising approach for improving the TACE therapeutic effect of HCC.

Bench-to-bedside development of multifunctional flexible embolic agents

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been demonstrated to provide a survival benefit for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, conventional TACE still faces limitations associated with complications, side effects, unsatisfactory tumor responses, repeated treatment, and narrow indications. For further improvement of TACE, additional beneficial functions such as degradability, drug-loading and releasing properties, detectability, targetability, and multiple therapeutic modalities were introduced. The purpose here is to provide a comprehensive overview of current and emerging particulate embolization technology with respect to materials. Therefore, this review systematically identified and described typical features, various functions, and practical applications of recently emerging micro/nano materials as particulate embolic agents for TACE. Besides, new insights into the liquid metals-based multifunctional and flexible embolic agents were highlighted. The current development routes and future outlooks of these micro/nano embolic materials were also presented to promote advancement in the field.

Microbiome and Metabolomics in Liver Cancer: Scientific Technology

Primary liver cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Liver cancer metabolism includes both the reprogramming of intracellular metabolism to enable cancer cells to proliferate inappropriately and adapt to the tumor microenvironment and fluctuations in regular tissue metabolism. Currently, metabolomics and metabolite profiling in liver cirrhosis, liver cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been in the spotlight in terms of cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and therapy. Metabolomics is the global analysis of small molecules, chemicals, and metabolites. Metabolomics technologies can provide critical information about the liver cancer state. Here, we review how liver cirrhosis, liver cancer, and HCC therapies interact with metabolism at the cellular and systemic levels. An overview of liver metabolomics is provided, with a focus on currently available technologies and how they have been used in clinical and translational research. We also list scalable methods, including chemometrics, followed by pathway processing in liver cancer. We conclude that important drivers of metabolomics science and scientific technologies are novel therapeutic tools and liver cancer biomarker analysis.

A VEGFR targeting peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) suppresses tumor angiogenesis in a TACE model for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the preferred therapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the embolization of tumor-feeding arteries by TACE always leads to hypoxia-related tumor angiogenesis, which limited the therapeutic effect for HCC. In this paper, we used a VEGFR targeting peptide VEGF125 − 136 (QKRKRKKSRYKS) to conjugate with a lytic peptide (KLUKLUKKLUKLUK) to form a peptide-drug conjugate (PDC). We used cell affinity assay to detect the peptide binding ability to VEGFR highly expressed cell lines, and CCK8, cell apoptosis to confirm the cellular toxicity for different cell lines. Meanwhile, we created a VX2 tumor-bearing rabbit model to assess the in vivo anti-tumor effect of the peptide conjugate in combination with TAE. HE staining was used to verify the in vivo safety of the peptide conjugate. IHC was used to assess the anti-angiogenesis and cell toxicity of the peptide conjugate in tumor tissues. The peptide conjugate could not only target VEGFR in cell surface and inhibit VEGFR function, but also have potent anti-cancer effect. We luckily found the peptide conjugate showed potent cytotoxicity for liver cancer cell Huh7 (IC50 7.3 ± 0.74 μM) and endothelial cell HUVEC (IC50 10.7 ± 0.292 μM) and induced cell apoptosis of these two cell lines. We also found the peptide conjugate inhibited cell migration of HUVEC through wound healing assay. Besides, these peptides also showed better in vivo anti-tumor effect than traditional drug DOX through TACE in VX2 rabbit tumor model, and efficiently inhibit angiogenesis in tumor tissues with good safety. In conclusion, our work may provide an alternative option for clinical HCC therapy via TACE combination.

Schematic presentation of the design of VEGFR targeting peptide conjugate (QR-KLU) and the antineoplastic efficacy of peptide QR-KLU in vitro and in vivo.

Lenvatinib plus TACE with or without pembrolizumab for the treatment of initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma harbouring PD-L1 expression: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy in selected populations of Chinese patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) harbouring programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with initial PD-L1-positive uHCC who received pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE or lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy were retrospectively identified from three medical institutions during 2016-2020. The primary endpoints included the rate of conversion therapy, defined as converting initially uHCC to hepatectomy, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoint was the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In total, 220 consecutively recruited patients were retrospectively reviewed, 78 of whom were ineligible according to the current criteria, leaving 142 patients [pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE: n = 70, median age 58 years (range 36-69) and lenvatinib-TACE: n = 72, 57 years (35-68)] who were eligible for the study. The median duration of follow-up was 27 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 26.3-28.7 months]. At the last follow-up, the rate of conversion therapy was 25.7% in the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE group and 11.1% in the lenvatinib-TACE group (p = 0.025). The median OS was 18.1 months (95% CI 16.5-20.7) in the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE group versus 14.1 months (95% CI 12.2-16.9) in the lenvatinib-TACE group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83; p = 0.004]. A distinct difference in the median PFS interval between the groups was detected [9.2 months (95% CI 7.1-10.4) in the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE group vs. 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9-6.6) in the lenvatinib-TACE group (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39-0.91; p = 0.006)]. The rates of the key AEs assessed, which were hypertension, nausea, and rash, were higher in the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE group than in the lenvatinib-TACE group (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among the selected populations of patients with initial PD-L1-positive uHCC, pembrolizumab-lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy may have promising antitumour activity, with an acceptable conversion rate and a well-characterized safety profile.

Sorafenib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for early intrahepatic stage-progressed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to conventional transarterial chemoembolization

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of sorafenib and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of early intrahepatic stage-progressed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (ISPA-HCC).

METHODS

This study was approved by the ethics committees of six tertiary medical centers in China. Between October 2017 and October 2020, 213 patients with advanced HCC received either sorafenib combined with on-demand DEB-TACE (DTS group, n = 103) or sorafenib monotherapy (S group, n = 110). Overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), local tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The incidences of nause/vomiting, abdonimal pain, hyperbilirubinemia, fever and ALT/AST increasing were higher in the DTS group. The post-treatment partial response, objective response, and disease control rates were significantly higher in the DTS group than in the S group (51.5% vs. 23.6%; 56.3% vs. 25.5%; 77.7% vs. 56.4%, respectively). The median OS was significantly longer in the DTS group than in the S group [16.3 vs. 10.0 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43; P < 0.001], as was the TTP (6.7 vs. 4.3 months; HR = 0.60; P = 0.001). In the DTS group, patients who received ≥ 2 sessions of DEB-TACE benefited more than those who received two sessions of DEB-TACE. Multivariate analysis revealed that the α-fetoprotein level and treatment allocation were independent predictors of OS and TTP.

CONCLUSION

The combination of sorafenib and DEB-TACE is safe and effective for the treatment of early ISPA-HCC.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus anti-PD1 versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than sorafenib or TACE monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) plus monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) versus TACE plus sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC.

Methods

Patients with advanced HCC who treated with RT plus anti-PD1 and TACE plus sorafenib were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and OS were calculated to assess the antitumor response and the treatment-related adverse events to the safety.

Results

Between January 2018 to March 2021, 37 patients underwent RT plus anti-PD1 and 41 patients underwent TACE plus sorafenib. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The ORR and DCR were significantly higher in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group according to RECIST 1.1 (54.05% vs. 12.20%, P < 0.001; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively) and according to mRECIST (56.76% vs. 31.71%, P = 0.039; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively). RT plus anti-PD1 provided significantly better PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.30–0.86; P = 0.017) than TACE plus sorafenib. Moreover, patients with RT plus anti-PD1 had significantly higher 3-, 6-, and 9-month OS rates than those with TACE plus sorafenib(97.3% vs. 92.30%, P < 0.001; 91.89% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001; 75.5% vs. 60.60%, P < 0.001; respectively). The median OS was more favorable 17.4 months for the RT + PD1 group and 11.9 months for the TACE plus sorafenib group. No treatment-related death was observed. Grade 3 or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred significantly less in patients in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group (29.7% vs. 75.6%, P < 0.001), and all TRAEs were manageable.

Conclusions

In this real-world study, RT plus anti-PD1 showed significantly promising efficacy and manageable safety than TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. The study provides evidence on a new therapeutic method in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Clinical application of gelatin sponge microparticles-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with synchronous antigen-presenting dendritic cell sequential reinfusion for treatment of advanced large liver cancer: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled trial

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of gelatin sponge microparticles-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (GSMs-TACE) plus synchronous antigen-presenting dendritic cell (DC) sequential reinfusion for advanced large liver cancer (LC).Patients with large LC were assigned to the experimental (combined sequential DC therapy) or control group. All patients received standardized GSMs-TACE. In the experimental group, 60 mL of peripheral blood was collected for in vitro culture of DCs (10-14 days). Then, intravenous reinfusion was conducted 3 times within 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery. Adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded and evaluated. The overall survival, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization frequency, and physical score (PS) were calculated.The median survival time of the experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group. There were significant differences in median progression-free survival between the 2 groups (P < .05) and the objective effective rate at 1 and 6 months and 1 year (P < .05), but not 2 years (P > .05). The PSs of 2 groups were significantly improved at 1 month after GSMs-TACE, with more obvious improvement in the experimental group (P < .05).GSMs-TACE plus synchronous DC sequential reinfusion significantly prolonged the median survival time, improved the tumor response rate and PS, prolonged progression-free survival, and reduced intervention frequency. GSMs-TACE plus synchronous DC sequential reinfusion treatment is suitable for comprehensive treatment of patients with advanced larger LC in China.

CalliSpheres® microspheres drug-eluting bead transhepatic artery chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for the treatment of large liver cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres^® microspheres drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with sorafenib in the treatment of large liver cancer.

METHOD

The study retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with large liver cancer. 42 patients who received DEB-TACE and sorafenib were included in the experimental group and 48 patients who received only DEB-TACE were included in the control group. The efficacy, TTP, OS and ARs were evaluated and further analysis was conducted on factors which might affect the prognosis.

RESULTS

As of June 2020. The median OS of the experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group (18.6 months vs. 12.7 months), and the TTP was also longer in the experimental group (8.3 months vs. 6.9 months). Three months after the intervention, the ORR and DCR of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. The main ARs of the experimental group taking sorafenib included hand-foot syndrome, skin rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, and anorexia. And they could be alleviated through treatment of the symptoms. TACE-related ARs for both groups were fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting, and there was no significant difference. Logistic regression analysis showed that the combined sorafenib treatment was a protective factor improving the prognosis of patients with large liver cancer, and risk factors were the number of tumors and vascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE combined with sorafenib is safe and well tolerated in the treatment of large liver cancer. It can improve the tumor control rate and prolong the survival time.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads plus lenvatinib versus sorafenib, a propensity score matching retrospective study

Recently, a prospective randomized study suggested that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib, as opposed to TACE plus sorafenib, was an effective and promising treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) having portal vein thrombus (PVTT) and large tumor burden. However, no propensity score matching retrospective studies on TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) plus lenvatinib (DEB-TACE+LEN) versus DEB-TACE plus sorafenib (DEB-TACE+SOR) for advanced HCC has been reported to date. The medical records of consecutive patients with advanced HCC who underwent DEB-TACE+LEN or DEB-TACE+SOR between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Mutation genes (VEGF, ANG2, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) were measured by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were compared between patients who underwent DEB-TACE+LEN and DEB-TACE+SOR. In total, 150 patients were enrolled in this study. The DEB-TACE+LEN group (n=50) showed significantly better ORR (64.0% vs. 33.3%; P=0.008), OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.98; P=0.043), and TTP (HR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.94; P=0.023) than that in the DEB-TACE+SOR group (n=100). Subgroup analyses showed that in patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), OS and TTP were significantly longer in the DEB-TACE+LEN group than in the DEB-TACE+SOR group (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.98; P=0.043; HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.35-2.29; P=0.035). In patients with FGF21 amplification, OS was also significantly longer in the DEB-TACE+LEN group than that in the DEB-TACE+SOR group (HR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.66; P=0.003). The patients in DEB-TACE+LEN group had a significantly lower incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (32.0% vs. 49.0%; P=0.048), but a higher incidence of proteinuria (26.0% vs. 10.0%; P=0.010) than that in the DEB-TACE+SOR group. In conclusion, DEB-TACE+LEN conferred better ORR, OS and TTP than did DEB-TACE+SOR in patients with advanced HCC, especially those with PVTT and FGF21 amplification, with acceptable AEs; thus making it a superior treatment modality for these patients.

Regorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

The benefits and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib as a second-line therapy has not been reported for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to explore the benefits and tolerability of TACE combined with second-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable advanced HCC and failure to first-line treatment.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study of patients with progression after first-line sorafenib and/or lenvatinib between 01/2019 and 04/2020 at four tertiary hospitals in China. The patients were treated with TACE. Then, 5-7 days after the first TACE, the patients started taking regorafenib for 3 weeks every 4-week cycle. The overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were observed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 5.6 (range 0.7, 17.0) months. The median age was 60 (range 35, 79) years. There were 32 (84.2%) males. The patients underwent a median of three TACE sessions (range 1-13). The initial doses of regorafenib were 20 mg/d (n = 1, 2.6%), 80 mg/d (n = 10, 26.3%), 120 mg/d (n = 15, 39.5%), and 160 mg/d (n = 11, 28.9%). The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 15.8%. Two patients stopped regorafenib due to AEs. The median OS was 14.3 months. The median PFS and TTP were 9.1 (95% CI 4.0, 14.2) and 9.1 (95% CI 5.5, 12.8) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides real-world evidence indicating that regorafenib combined with TACE was beneficial and tolerable in patients with unresectable HCC. Additional prospective large-scale studies are required for confirmation.

Comprehensive Treatment of Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Lenvatinib Followed by Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Aim: This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 22 patients with advanced HCC from March 2018 to December 2019. All the patients received comprehensive treatment with TACE plus lenvatinib followed by camrelizumab. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Treatment response and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the whole cohort were 68.2 and 100% at the first month and 72.7 and 95.5% at the third month, respectively. The median OS was 24 months (95% CI, 20.323-27.677 months), and the median PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI, 8.846-13.954 months). The majority of treatment-related adverse reactions were mild or moderate, except for 4 that developed to grade 3-4 (3 reactions of grade 3, 1 reaction of grade 4). No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Conclusion: Trans-arterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib and camrelizumab shows good results incontrolling tumour progression and prolonging median OS in patients with advanced HCC.

Association Between Adjuvant Sorafenib and the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma at a High Risk of Recurrence After Radical Resection

Background

The use of sorafenib in the adjuvant management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial.

Aim

To analyze the effects of adjuvant sorafenib therapy in patients with HCC at high recurrence risk after radical resection.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent radical resection (R0 resection) for HCC at the Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between August 2009 and August 2017. All patients had microvascular invasion and were evaluated for portal vein tumor thrombus. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and survival after recurrence. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.

Results

Before matching, there were 56 and 167 patients in the sorafenib and non-sorafenib groups. After PSM, there were 42 patients/group, and there were no significant differences in patient characteristics (all P>0.05). After PSM, compared with the non-sorafenib group, the sorafenib group showed longer median OS (34 vs. 26 months, P=0.032) and survival after recurrence (16 vs. 9 months, P=0.002), but no difference in RFS (14 vs. 11 months, P=0.564). Adjuvant sorafenib was the only factor independently associated with OS (HR=0.619, 95% CI: 0377–0.994, P=0.047). No factors were independently associated with RFS (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Although adjuvant sorafenib therapy for patients with HCC and high recurrence risk does not reduce the recurrence risk of HCC, it might be associated with longer survival and a lower risk of death.

Optimal timing of combining sorafenib with trans-arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

•

Sorafenib in combination with TACE can prolong survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

•

Compared with TACE + placebo / alone, the combination of TACE and sorafenib can significantly improve the efficacy and safety of hepatocellular carcinoma.

•

The timing of sorafenib combined with TACE may be a statistical difference in terms of survival and adverse events.

Background

The combination therapy of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib were proved to be one of the effective methods for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it has been confirmed that the combination therapy can prolong survival for advanced HCC effectively, the therapeutic efficacy and safety are still controversial and the clinical value has not been determined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and discuss the optimal timing of combination for better clinical benefits.

Data sources

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed to search for relevant studies published before May 15, 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TACE + sorafenib with TACE + placebo / alone were adopted. Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes. The data were analyzed through fixed/random-effect meta-analysis models with Review Manager (Version 5. 3) software.

Results

7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with 1464 patients with unresectable HCC (734 in TACE + sorafenib group and 730 in TACE + placebo or alone group). Meta-analysis showed that objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were slightly improved in TACE + sorafenib group (ORR: risk ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.42; P = 0.002; DCR: risk ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.18; P = 0.02). The combination therapy obviously improved time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.96; P = 0.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52–0.73, P < 0.00001) but not overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.46; P = 0.75) or time to untreatable progression (TTUP) (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.89; P = 0.56). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in combination group were higher than TACE + placebo / alone group. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the heterogeneity of TTP was notably decreased (pre-TACE: P = 0.12, I² = 48%; post-TACE: P = 0.58, I² = 0%), and the hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.68; P < 0.00001) in pre-TACE subgroup which indicated that combination before TACE significantly prolonged TTP but not in combination after TACE (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.62–1.24; P = 0.46). In term of AEs, sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk ratio for hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, rash/desquamation, and hypertension was 7.41, 2.58, 2.14, 1.55 in pre-TACE subgroup respectively and was 11.34, 3.26, 3.61, 4.11 in post-TACE subgroup respectively (All P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of TACE and sorafenib significantly can improve TTP and PFS, and reduce the level of risk of adverse reactions of unresectable HCC, especially in the combination before TACE.

Redefining Intermediate-Stage HCC Treatment in the Era of Immune Therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. At diagnosis, most patients are ineligible for curative surgery, and approximately 20% of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. A significant proportion of patients fall under an unresectable or intermediate-stage disease who have liver-limited disease but are not surgical candidates because of large tumor size, number of lesions, or technically inoperable disease. In this unique intermediate-stage patient population, locoregional therapies have been the de facto mainstay of treatment because of high local response rates and favorable safety profile, especially in the context of minimally effective systemic therapies. However, not all patients who receive locoregional therapy for incurable disease have improved survival, and importantly, some of these patients never receive systemic therapy because of disease progression or further decline in hepatic function. Meanwhile, with the remarkable progress that has been made with systemic therapy in the past few years, revisiting the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC seems prudent. In this review, we will highlight current and emerging strategies for treating patients with unresectable, liver-limited HCC.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios as Predictors of Outcomes in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib

Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for outcomes following the combination treatment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib.

Materials and Methods: A total of 314 (270 male and 44 female) treatment-naïve patients with unresectable HCC treated by TACE plus sorafenib between January 2011 and December 2018 were enrolled in the retrospective study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were obtained within 3–7 days before the initial TACE and the median value of the NLR and PLR was considered as the cut-off value.

Results: The median value of NLR and PLR was 2.42 and 100, respectively. The median OS and PFS of the entire cohort were 18.7 months (95% CI: 16.8–20.6) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 8.5–9.8), respectively. The low NLR and PLR group showed improved OS and PFS compared with the high NLR and PLR group [21.8 months (95% CI: 15.2–28.5) vs. 15.4 months (95% CI: 12.4–18.3), p < 0.0001; 21.6 months (95% CI: 15.8–27.5) vs. 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.9–17.8), p = 0.00027, respectively]. In addition, the low NLR and PLR group also provided a longer PFS than the high NLR and PLR group [10.4 months (95% CI: 8.9–12.0) vs. 8.1 months (95% CI: 7.1–9.2), p = 0.00022; 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.6–11.9) vs. 8.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–9.2), p < 0.0001, respectively]. High NLR and PLR at baseline were predictive factors of poor OS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.004) and PFS (p = 0.045 and p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This study showed the prognostic value of quantitative inflammatory biomarkers in correlation with OS and PFS in unresectable HCC patients undergoing TACE plus sorafenib treatment.

Improved survival following transarterial radioembolization of infiltrative-appearance hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Infiltrative-appearance hepatocellular carcinoma presents a challenge to clinicians as diagnostic criteria continue to evolve and evidence-based treatment guidelines have yet to be established. While transarterial radioembolization has shown efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma, many studies exclude infiltrative-appearance HCC in their analysis. The purpose of this study was to describe imaging features of infiltrative-appearance hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluate effects of radioembolization on survival.

METHODS

In a retrospective review, infiltrative HCC patients treated from 2008 to 2017 were identified. Patients were divided into two groups: TARE versus systemic therapy/palliative care. Demographics, dates of diagnosis/expiry, albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), sodium, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), creatinine, Child-Pugh class, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, bilirubin, radiation dose and volume were collected. Patients with bilirubin > 3 were excluded. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test assessed differences between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were identified, 15 underwent TARE while 38 served as control. Mean age was 60, 43 patients were male. The mean overall survival was 16.2 months for the TARE group and 5.3 months for the control group (Log-rank p < 0.0001). Cox proportional regression analysis revealed significant associations between survival and albumin (HR 0.210, 0.052-0.839, p = 0.027), Child-Pugh class B (HR 0.196, 0.055-0.696, p = 0.012), sorafenib (HR 0.106, 0.031-0.360, p < 0.001), and number of affected liver lobes (HR 1.864, 1.387-2.506, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Transarterial radioembolization for infiltrative HCC improves life expectancy compared to treatment with comfort measures or systemic therapy.

Current status of sorafenib nanoparticle delivery systems in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Advanced HCC displays strong resistance to chemotherapy, and traditional chemotherapy drugs do not achieve satisfactory therapeutic efficacy. Sorafenib is an oral kinase inhibitor that inhibits tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis and induces cancer cell apoptosis. It also improves the survival rates of patients with advanced liver cancer. However, due to its poor solubility, fast metabolism, and low bioavailability, clinical applications of sorafenib have been substantially restricted. In recent years, various studies have been conducted on the use of nanoparticles to improve drug targeting and therapeutic efficacy in HCC. Moreover, nanoparticles have been extensively explored to improve the therapeutic efficacy of sorafenib, and a variety of nanoparticles, such as polymer, lipid, silica, and metal nanoparticles, have been developed for treating liver cancer. All these new technologies have improved the targeted treatment of HCC by sorafenib and promoted nanomedicines as treatments for HCC. This review provides an overview of hot topics in tumor nanoscience and the latest status of treatments for HCC. It further introduces the current research status of nanoparticle drug delivery systems for treatment of HCC with sorafenib.

Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-Based Nanodelivery Systems to Enhance the Anticancer Effect of Sorafenib Drug in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells

The formation of two nanodelivery systems, Sorafenib (SF)-loaded chitosan (SF-CS) and their folate-coated (SF-CS-FA) nanoparticles (NPs), were developed to enhance SF drug delivery on human Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HepG2) and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma (HT29) cell lines. The ionic gelation method was adopted to synthesize the NPs. The characterizations were performed by DLS, FESEM, TEM, XRD, TGA, FTIR, and UV-visible spectroscopy. It was found that 83.7 ± 2.4% and 87.9 ± 1.1% of encapsulation efficiency; 18.2 ± 1.3% and 19.9 ± 1.4% of loading content; 76.3 ± 13.7 nm and 81.6 ± 12.9 nm of hydrodynamic size; 60–80 nm and 70–100 nm of TEM; and FESEM sizes of near-spherical shape were observed, respectively, for SF-CS and SF-CS-FA nanoparticles. The SF showed excellent release from the nanoparticles under pH 4.8 PBS solution, indicating a good delivery system for tumor cells. The cytotoxicity study revealed their better anticancer action towards HepG2 and HT29 cell lines compared to the free sorafenib. Moreover, both NPs systems showed negligible toxicity to normal Human Dermal Fibroblast adult cells (HDFa). This is towards an enhanced anticancer drug delivery system with sustained-release properties for better cancer management.

Deep Learning Predicts Overall Survival of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib

Objectives

To develop and validate a deep learning-based overall survival (OS) prediction model in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study consisted of 201 patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable HCC who were treated with TACE plus sorafenib. Data from 120 patients were used as the training set for model development. A deep learning signature was constructed using the deep image features from preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. An integrated nomogram was built using Cox regression by combining the deep learning signature and clinical features. The deep learning signature and nomograms were also externally validated in an independent validation set of 81 patients. C-index was used to evaluate the performance of OS prediction.

Results

The median OS of the entire set was 19.2 months and no significant difference was found between the training and validation cohort (18.6 months vs. 19.5 months, P = 0.45). The deep learning signature achieved good prediction performance with a C-index of 0.717 in the training set and 0.714 in the validation set. The integrated nomogram showed significantly better prediction performance than the clinical nomogram in the training set (0.739 vs. 0.664, P = 0.002) and validation set (0.730 vs. 0.679, P = 0.023).

Conclusion

The deep learning signature provided significant added value to clinical features in the development of an integrated nomogram which may act as a potential tool for individual prognosis prediction and identifying HCC patients who may benefit from the combination therapy of TACE plus sorafenib.

Prognosis Nomogram for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Invasion Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib Treatment: A Retrospective Multicentre Study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the outcomes of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) and to establish a prognostic prediction nomogram to differentiate target patients and stratify risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicentre, retrospective study consisted of 185 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with HCC and PVTT treated with TACE plus sorafenib from three institutions between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2017. The primary outcome measurement of the study was overall survival (OS). The type of PVTT was classified by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The prognostic nomogram was established based on the predictors and was performed with interval validation.

RESULTS

The median OS of the Vp1-3 and Vp4 groups was 12.4 months (11.7-18.9) and 8.5 months (7.6-11.2) (P = 0.00098), respectively, and there was a significant difference in the median OS between the Vp1-2 and Vp3 subgroups (16.4 months (12.2-27.9) vs. 10.9 months (8.4-18.1), P = 0.041). The multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that tumour size, albumin-bilirubin grade, and PVTT type were independent prognostic factors. The C-index value of the nomogram based on these predictors in the entire cohort was 0.731 (0.628-0.833).

CONCLUSIONS

After the combined therapy of TACE and sorafenib, advanced HCC patients with segmental or subsegmental PVTT showed better survival than those with main PVTT. The nomogram can be applied to identify advanced HCC patients with PVTT who may benefit most from the combination treatment and be helpful for making decision in clinical practice.

Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.

Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial

OBJECTIVE

This trial compared the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib with TACE alone using a newly established TACE-specific endpoint and pre-treatment of sorafenib before initial TACE.

DESIGN

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomised to TACE plus sorafenib (n=80) or TACE alone (n=76). Patients in the combination group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2-3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable (unTACEable) progression (TTUP), defined as untreatable tumour progression, transient deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a conventional one but defined as TTUP, or time to any cause of death plus overall survival (OS). Multiplicity was adjusted by gatekeeping hierarchical testing.

RESULTS

Median PFS was significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib than in the TACE alone group (25.2 vs 13.5 months; p=0.006). OS was not analysed because only 73.6% of OS events were reached. Median TTUP (26.7 vs 20.6 months; p=0.02) was also significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib group. OS at 1 year and 2 years in TACE plus sorafenib group and TACE alone group were 96.2% and 82.7% and 77.2% and 64.6%, respectively. There were no unexpected toxicities.

CONCLUSION

TACE plus sorafenib significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. Adverse events were consistent with those of previous TACE combination trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01217034.

Is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib better than chemoembolization plus placebo in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with TACE plus placebo for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using meta-analytical techniques.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were done from inception to December 27, 2019. Published trials including a treatment group receiving TACE + sorafenib and a control group receiving TACE + placebo with data for at least 1-year survival or tumor response or time to progression were included.

RESULTS

Our study suggested that there was no evidence that TACE plus sorafenib was associated with a lower risk of disease progression compared with TACE plus placebo for treatment of HCC (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-1.05]), and no significant difference for treatment of HCC compared with TACE plus placebo in terms of 0.5-, 1-, 1.5-, and 2-year survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97-1.05]; RR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.92-1.08], RR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.23], RR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.72-1.34], respectively). The meta-analysis also showed that TACE + sorafenib seemed to have no significant difference for treatment of HCC compared with TACE + placebo in terms of complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, overall response rate, and disease control rate. There was an increased incidence of fatigue of grade 3/4 and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase of grade 3/4 in patients receiving TACE plus sorafenib compared with those receiving TACE plus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no additive benefit of TACE plus sorafenib compared to TACE plus placebo for HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma, novel therapies on the horizon

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is associated with high mortality rate. Incidence remains high due to the persistent prevalence of viral hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NFLD). Despite screening efforts, the majority of patients present with advanced disease, add to the high risk of recurrence after curative surgery. Conventional chemotherapy did not alter the nature history of advanced and metastatic HCC. The discovery of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) led to the approval of sorafenib as first efficacious therapy. A new era in the treatment paradigm of HCC is evolving. Since the advent of sorafenib as an active treatment option for patients presenting with advanced or metastatic disease, several agents have been examined. This was linked with many failures, and success stories to celebrate. Herein, we describe the historical progress and current advances of systemic therapies post-sorafenib. Lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab, are all presently added and available therapeutic options in the advanced setting. The evaluation of novel treatment combinations including anti-angiogenic, TKIs plus checkpoint inhibitors, add to dual checkpoint inhibitors is evolving rapidly starting with the advent of the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Combining local and systemic therapies is being actively investigated, as an option for locally advanced disease conventionally treated with locoregional approaches. The horizon remains promising and continues to evolve for HCC a disease long considered with unmet needs.

Autophagy inhibition by reversine and its suppressive effects on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a great challenge for physicians and patients worldwide. The anti-tumor effects of reversine have attracted much more concerns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study evaluated the growth regulatory effects of reversine on HCC cells lines. Meanwhile, the underlying mechanism including autophagy modulation was also identified.

RESULTS

reversine markedly inhibited the proliferation of both HCC cells and induced cell apoptosis and multinuclear in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the decreased ratio of LC3II/LC3I as well as elevated p62 expression were observed under reversine treatment, indicating the autophagy inhibition by reversine in HepG2 cell line. Moreover, modulation of autophagy with rapamycin and chloroquine significantly attenuated and enhanced the cytostatic effects of reversine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

reversine could reduce the cell viability of HCC cells via inducing cell apoptosis and polyploidy. In addition, cell autophagy was involved and might play a protective role in HCC cells, the joint use of autophagy inhibitor enhanced reversine-mediating antitumor effects. Our data offered novel ideas for comprehensive therapeutic regimes on human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with apatinib administration in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2015 to May 2017, a total of 32 patients with advanced HCC treated with DEB-TACE combined with apatinib were consecutively enrolled in this study. The treatment response and laboratory outcomes were assessed at the first- and third month after DEB-TACE therapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events were also analyzed and assessed.

RESULTS

The objective response rate and disease control rate were 62.5% and 96.9% at the first month after treatment, respectively. At the third month after the first therapy, a slightly higher objective response rate (68.8%) and lower disease control rate (90.6%) were achieved. There were no differences in the levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, serum albumin, or total bilirubin at M1 or M3 compared to M0 (all p> 0.05) The median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 8.1-10.9 months), and the median overall survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval, 20.2-23.9 months). Among the 32 patients, 2 had hypertension and 1 had grade 3 diarrhea; the rest of the patients had mild to moderate adverse reactions that were acceptable, and no serious adverse reactions occurred.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE combined with apatinib is a safe and promising treatment approach for patients with advanced HCC.

Efficacy evaluation of the combination therapy of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Background

Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are the standard treatments recommended by guidelines for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although previous studies have shown the combination therapy of sorafenib and TACE to be safe, there is no consensus regarding its efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis, which was based on the findings of comparative clinical trials, was conducted to provide up-to-date and comprehensive information about the efficacy of combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy in unresectable HCC.

Methods

Multiple databases were systematically reviewed to screen studies through particular inclusion criteria. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was collected and analyzed by Revman 5.3 in a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model. Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.

Results

This review ultimately included 14 comparative studies focused on combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy. Of these: 5 studies conducted TACE plus sorafenib versus TACE with placebo; 9 studies provided overall survival (OS) in combination groups which ranged from 10.3 to 29.7 months; and 10 studies provided time to progression (TTP) in combination groups which ranged from 2.6 to 10.8 months. The disease control rate (DCR) in combination groups ranged from 9.7% to 89.2% in 7 of the studies. After performing a random effects meta-analysis model, our study showed that OS (HR =0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.79, P<0.0001) and TTP (HR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.88, P=0.001) have been significantly improved in the combination therapy group when compared with the TACE monotherapy group. AEs mainly included hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue and diarrhea and the majority of these were in grade 1 or grade 2.

Conclusions

Combination therapy has significant advantages over TACE monotherapy in terms of improving TTP and OS.

A novel multitarget kinase inhibitor BZG with potent anticancer activity in vitro and vivo enhances efficacy of sorafenib through PI3K pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

OBJECTIVES

BZG as a novel multitarget kinase inhibitor, has been proved to inhibit the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously. In this study, we aimed at investigating the underlying mechanisms of BZG with and without sorafenib and evaluating their anti-tumor effects as well as whether BZG could inhibit the activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling which is associated with acquired resistance to sorafenib.

METHODS

We evaluated the proliferation of HCC cells by CCK-8 assay and colony formation assay. Cell apoptosis was assessed by Hoechst 33342 staining assay and flow cytometry. Western blot was used to detect the critical enzymes in the PI3K pathways and the expression of p-ERK after BZG alone and combined with sorafenib treatments. Huh-7 hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft model was used to evaluate the anti-carcinoma effects of BZG alone and in combination in vivo. HE staining and TUNEL assay tested the necrosis of tumor tissue and apoptosis of tumor cells.

RESULTS

BZG could inhibit the proliferation of HCC cells in a dose-dependent manner. The combination of BZG and sorafenib produced synergistic effects. PI3K and p-ERK pathway were involved in the anti-tumor functions of BZG alone and when combined with sorafenib. In addition, the combination treatment was seen to be more effective in inhibiting the expression of p-AKT, p-ERK and p-mTOR. Furthermore, Tumor necrosis and cell apoptosis were also observed in Huh-7 hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft models.

CONCLUSIONS

BZG is an attractive agent for treating HCC. The effects of BZG and sorafenib's co-treatment on HCC are more effective than BZG or sorafenib alone.

Regorafenib-loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres designed to improve transarterial chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been widely introduced to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) especially for unresectable patients for decades. However, TACE evokes an angiogenic response due to the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), resulting in the formation of new blood vessels and eventually tumor recurrence. Thus, we aimed to develop regorafenib (REGO)-loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres that enabled localized and sustained drug delivery to limit proangiogenic responses following TACE in HCC treatment. REGO-loaded PLGA microspheres were prepared using the emulsion-solvent evaporation/extraction method, in which DMF was selected as an organic phase co-solvent. Accordingly, we optimized the proportion of DMF, which the optimal ratio to DCM was 1:9 (v/v). After preparation, the microspheres provided high drug loading capacity of 28.6%, high loading efficiency of 91.5%, and the average particle size of 149 µm for TACE. IR spectra and XRD were applied to confirming sufficient REGO entrapment. The in vitro release profiles demonstrated sustained drug release of microspheres for more than 30 d To confirm the role of REGO-loaded microspheres in TACE, the cell cytotoxic activity on HepG2 cells and anti-angiogenic effects in HUVECs Tube-formation assay were studied in combination with miriplatin. Moreover, the microspheres indicated the potential of antagonizing miriplatin resistance of HepG2 cells in vitro. Pharmacokinetics preliminary studies exhibited that REGO could be sustainably released from microspheres for more than 30 d after TACE in vivo. In vivo anti-tumor efficacy was further determined in HepG2 xenograft tumor mouse model, demonstrating that REGO microspheres could improve the antitumor efficacy of miriplatin remarkably compared with miriplatin monotherapy. In conclusion, the obtained REGO microspheres demonstrated promising therapeutic effects against HCC when combined with TACE.

Liver Cancer: Current and Future Trends Using Biomaterials

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common type of cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Despite advancement in current treatments for HCC, the prognosis for this cancer is still unfavorable. This comprehensive review article focuses on all the current technology that applies biomaterials to treat and study liver cancer, thus showing the versatility of biomaterials to be used as smart tools in this complex pathologic scenario. Specifically, after introducing the liver anatomy and pathology by focusing on the available treatments for HCC, this review summarizes the current biomaterial-based approaches for systemic delivery and implantable tools for locally administrating bioactive factors and provides a comprehensive discussion of the specific therapies and targeting agents to efficiently deliver those factors. This review also highlights the novel application of biomaterials to study HCC, which includes hydrogels and scaffolds to tissue engineer 3D in vitro models representative of the tumor environment. Such models will serve to better understand the tumor biology and investigate new therapies for HCC. Special focus is given to innovative approaches, e.g., combined delivery therapies, and to alternative approaches-e.g., cell capture-as promising future trends in the application of biomaterials to treat HCC.

Transarterial Chemoembolisation (TACE) with Degradable Starch Microspheres (DSM) and Anthracycline in Patients with Locally Extensive Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Safety and Efficacy

PURPOSE

To evalutate safety and efficacy of degradable starch microspheres (DSM) as embolic agent in transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of unresectable, locally extensive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 37 patients with intermediate to advanced HCC treated with ≥ 3 chemoembolisations with doxorubicin/epirubicin and DSM were analysed. Patients were treated with three consecutive chemoembolisations in 4-weekly intervals. Clinical parameters and laboratory findings were obtained from patient records before and after each intervention. Tumour response was assessed after every 3 embolisations by CT/MRI according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with HCC were treated with 177 DSM-TACEs (3-12/patient, mean 4.8). Disease stages according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system were: 27 × B, 9 × C, 1 × D. Five patients had uninodular, 32 multinodular (23 bilobar) disease. Three patients had portal vein invasion. Apart from one possibly procedure-related grade 3 complication, only grade 1 adverse events occurred. These were pain reacting to analgesics (23%), transient nausea (11%), vomiting (3%) and post-embolisation syndrome (4%). Transient laboratory changes were bone marrow toxicity (29%) and increase in INR (14%), creatinine (8%) or bilirubin (38%). Tumour response was objective response rate 49%, disease control rate 83%. Median survival was 19 months: 22 months for BCLC stage B and 6.7 months for BCLC stages C + D. Responders had a significantly better prognosis than non-responders.

CONCLUSION

DSM-TACE of HCC is safe even in patients with advanced disease stages. Tumour response and survival rates were encouraging in our series of patients with locally extensive disease.

Locoregional Therapy, Immunotherapy and the Combination in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Future Directions

Image-guided locoregional therapies (LRTs) have long been a vital part of treatment regimens for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ablation, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are examples of commonly used treatment techniques for HCC. This review describes the various methods utilized to treat HCC in the field of interventional oncology and also focuses on new and novel treatment concepts being developed in the field including the use of novel immunotherapy agents and combination therapy of LRTs with immunotherapy.

Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis: comparing east and west

Portal vein tumour thrombosis is common among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Tremendous differences exist in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis between the east and the west, which derive from heterogeneities in its epidemiology, causes, pathology, comorbidities, prognosis, and other demographics. These divergences between the east and the west are not only caused by hepatocellular carcinoma itself, but are also affected by many variables including social factors, physician preferences, accessibility to costly or novel treatments, and reimbursement schemes. In this Review, we compare and contrast the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis in the east and in the west in terms of systemic and surgical treatments, radiotherapy, transcatheter arterial therapies, and portal vein revascularisation. We conclude that a personalised, data-driven approach to care with active management from a multidisciplinary team, as well as increased communication and collaboration between clinicians and researchers based in east and the west, could help to reduce the differences in management and optimise treatment strategies.

Advances in Biomaterials and Technologies for Vascular Embolization

Minimally invasive transcatheter embolization is a common nonsurgical procedure in interventional radiology used for the deliberate occlusion of blood vessels for the treatment of diseased or injured vasculature. A wide variety of embolic agents including metallic coils, calibrated microspheres, and liquids are available for clinical practice. Additionally, advances in biomaterials, such as shape-memory foams, biodegradable polymers, and in situ gelling solutions have led to the development of novel preclinical embolic agents. The aim here is to provide a comprehensive overview of current and emerging technologies in endovascular embolization with respect to devices, materials, mechanisms, and design guidelines. Limitations and challenges in embolic materials are also discussed to promote advancement in the field.

Super-Selective Transarterial Chemoembolization with Doxorubicin-Loaded Drug-Eluting Beads Sized Below and Above 100 Microns in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study

Objectives To compare efficacy and safety of super-selective DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded microspheres sized below and above 100 microns for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods All consecutive patients with HCC who underwent DEB-TACE were included in this retrospective study. Regarding to microsphere size (>100 microns or <100 microns), patients were determined as Group A (n = 28) and Group B (n = 30), respectively. Results Of the 58 patients (78% males), no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age and gender (P = 0.388, P = 0.888, respectively). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of BCLC stages, presence of chronic liver disease, and Child-Pugh classes (P = 0.593, P = 0.081, P = 0.391, respectively). Although statistically insignificant, median overall survival (19 months vs 32 months, P = 0.190) and median progression-free survival (13 months vs 20 months (P = 0.574) were longer and 1-3-years objective response rates (7.40% vs 23.33%, P = 0.330) were higher in Group B than in Group A, respectively. No mortality or major complications were observed. Grade I/ II adverse events were detected in all patients. Transient elevations in liver function tests (Grade III adverse events) were similar in both groups (3.57% vs 3.33%; P = 0.980). Conclusion Super-selective DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded microspheres sized <100 microns is an effective and safe method for the HCC treatment. Objective response rates are higher and survival durations are longer after DEB-TACE performed with doxorubicin-loaded microspheres sized below 100 microns. Keywords Chemoembolization Doxorubicin Microspheres Drug-eluting beads Hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib with Transarterial Chemoembolization Achieves Improved Survival vs. Sorafenib Alone in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

We hypothesized that sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) would confer survival benefits over sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). We investigated this while using the population-based All-Cancer Dataset to assemble a cohort (n = 3674; median age, 60; 83% men) of patients receiving sorafenib for aHCC (Child-Pugh A) with macro-vascular invasion or nodal/distant metastases. The patients were classified into the sorafenib-TACE group (n = 426) or the propensity score-matched sorafenib-alone group (n = 1686). All of the participants were followed up until death or the end of the study. Time-dependent Cox model and the Mantel-Byar test were used for survival analysis. During the median follow-ups of 221 and 133 days for the sorafenib-TACE and sorafenib-alone groups, 164 (39%) and 916 (54%) deaths occurred, respectively; the corresponding median overall survivals (OS) were 381 and 204 days, respectively (hazard ratio, HR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.63-0.88; p = 0.021). The one-year and six-month OS were 53.5% and 80.3% in the sorafenib-TACE group and 32.4% and 54.4% in the sorafenib-alone group, respectively. The major complications were comparable between the two groups. The addition of TACE to sorafenib improves survival, with a 26% reduction in mortality. These findings provide strong real-world evidence that supports this combination strategy for eligible Child-Pugh A aHCC patients.

Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a summary review

It is well known that intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) encompasses the widest class of patients with this disease. The main characteristic of this special sub-group of patients is that it is extensively heterogenous. This substantial heterogeneity is due to the wide range of liver functions of such patients and variable tumor numbers and sizes. Real world clinical data show huge support for transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) as a therapeutic modality for intermediate stage HCC, applied in 50%-60% of those class of patients. There are special considerations in various international guidelines regarding treatment allocation in intermediate stage HCC. There is an epidemiological difference in HCC in eastern and western cohorts, and various guidelines have been proposed. In patients with HCC, it has frequently been reported that there is poor correlation between the clinical benefit and real gain in patient condition and the conventional way of tumor response assessment after locoregional treatments. This is due to the evaluation criteria in addition to the scoring systems used for treatment allocation in those patients. It became clear that intermediate stage HCC patients receiving TACE need a proper prognostic score that offers valid clinical prediction and supports proper decision-making. Also, it is the proper time to study more treatment options beyond TACE, such as multimodal regimens for this class of patients. In this review, we tried to provide a summary of the challenges and future directions in managing patients with intermediate stage HCC.

Outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≥10 cm.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with naïve HCC ≥10 cm (mean maximum tumor diameter, 130 ± 27.6 mm; single [n = 12], 2-9 [n = 6], and ≥10 [n = 7]) without extrahepatic spread treated with cTACE were eligible. Five (20%) had vascular invasion. Two to three stepwise cTACE sessions using iodized oil ≤10 mL in one cTACE session were scheduled. When the tumor recurred, additional cTACE was repeated on demand, if possible. Overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Stepwise cTACE sessions were completed for 20 (80%) patients, but could not be completed for four (16%). In the remaining (4%) patient, the whole tumor was embolized in one session. Additional treatment, mainly cTACE, was undertaken for 19 (76%) patients. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 68, 34.7, and 23.1%, respectively. A tumor number of three was a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.020) and the 1-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates in patients with ≤3 and ≥4 tumors were 81.3 and 33.3, 55.6 and 11.1, and 38.9% and 0%, respectively. Whole tumor embolization and the serum level of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II were also significant prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.042, respectively). Bile duct complications requiring additional interventions developed in two (8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Conventional TACE is safe and effective for huge HCCs, but has limited effects in cases with four or more tumors.

Rethinking the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Data Driven Treatment Algorithm for Optimizing Outcomes

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with a majority of HCC patients not suitable for curative therapies. Approximately 70% of initially diagnosed patients cannot undergo surgical resection or transplantation due to locally advanced disease, poor liver function/underlying cirrhosis, or additional comorbidities. Local therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC, who are not suitable for thermal ablation, include transarterial embolization (bland, chemoembolization, radioembolization) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Regarding EBRT specifically, technological advancements provide a means for safe and effective radiotherapy delivery in a wide spectrum of HCC patients. In multiple prospective studies, EBRT delivery in a variety of different fractionation schemes or in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) demonstrate improved outcomes, particularly with combination therapy. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification provides a framework for treatment selection; however, given the growing complexity of treatment strategies, this classification system tends to simplify decision-making. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding unresectable HCC and propose a modified treatment algorithm that emphasizes the role of radiation therapy for Child-Pugh score A or B patients with ≤3 nodules measuring >3 cm, multinodular disease or portal venous thrombosis.