Randomized, phase III study of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy versus observation, with predefined second-line treatment, after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

QT-Interval Prolongation, Torsades de Pointes, and Heart Failure With EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review

A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the incidence and mortality of QT-interval prolongation (QTp), torsades de pointes (TdP), and heart failure (HF) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs. Of 296 identified publications, 95 met eligibility criteria and were abstracted for QTp/TdP and HF outcomes (QTp/TdP: 83 publications, including 5 case study publications; HF: 79 publications, including 6 case study publications [involving 8 patients]). QTp incidence ranged from 0% to 27.8% in observational studies and from 0% to 11% in clinical trials, with no deaths due to QTp. There were no TdP events or deaths due to TdP. The incidence of HF ranged from 0% to 8%, and HF mortality rates ranged from 0% to 4%. Patients receiving treatment with EGFR TKIs should be monitored for signs of QTp, TdP, and HF per prescribing information. Standardized definitions and methods to improve monitoring of QTp, TdP, and HF-related events are needed in patients with NSCLC.

Adverse Event Profile of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the frontline standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. An updated toxicity profile of EGFR-TKIs proves valuable in guiding clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVE

This study comprehensively assessed the risk of EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) involving different systems/organs.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with placebo or chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs) including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, and respiratory events was pooled for a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on the control arm (placebo or chemotherapy) and individual EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) were conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-four randomized controlled trials comprising 15,887 patients were included. The pooled OR showed EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade dermatologic AEs including paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, and skin fissures, gastrointestinal AEs including abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, mouth ulceration, and stomatitis, hepatic AEs including elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and respiratory AEs including epistaxis, interstitial lung disease and rhinorrhea. Furthermore, a significantly increased risk of high-grade rash (OR 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.11, 12.00), diarrhea (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.44, 3.05), elevated alanine aminotransferase (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.71, 9.03), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.05, 9.92) and interstitial lung disease (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38, 4.01) was observed in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. When stratified by individual EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib showed a significant association with all-grade and high-grade hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were associated with a significantly increased risk of various types of AEs. Clinicians should be vigilant about the risks of these EGFR-TKI-related AEs, particularly for severe hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease, to facilitate early detection and proper management.

Use of conditional estimates of effect in cancer epidemiology: An application to lung cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

In oncology clinical trials, there is the assumption that randomization sufficiently balances confounding covariates and therefore average treatment effects are usually reported. This paper explores the wider benefits provided by conditioning on covariates for reasons other than mitigation of confounding.

METHODS

We reanalyzed the data from primary randomized controlled trials listed in two meta-analyses to explore the significance of conditioning on smoking status in terms of the effect magnitude of treatment on progression free survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

The reanalysis revealed that conditioning on smoking status using sub-group analyses provided the closest empiric estimate of individual treatment effect based on smoking status and significantly reduced the heterogeneity of treatment effect observed across studies. In addition, smoking status was determined to be a modifier of the effect of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Conditioning on prognostic covariates in randomized trials in oncology helps generate the closest empiric estimates of individual treatment benefit, addresses heterogeneity due to varying covariate distributions across trials and facilitates future decision making as well as evidence synthesis. Conditioning using sub-group analyses also allows examination for effect modification in meta-analysis.

Novel Strategies Using Sagacious Targeting for Site-Specific Drug Delivery in Breast Cancer Treatment: Clinical Potential and Applications

For more than a decade, researchers have been working to achieve new strategies and smart targeting drug delivery techniques and technologies to treat breast cancer (BC). Nanotechnology presents a hopeful strategy for targeted drug delivery into the building of new therapeutics using the properties of nanomaterials. Nanoparticles are of high regard in the field of diagnosis and the treatment of cancer. The use of these nanoparticles as an encouraging approach in the treatment of various cancers has drawn the interest of researchers in recent years. In order to achieve the maximum therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of BC, combination therapy has also been adopted, leading to minimal side effects and thus an enhancement in the quality of life for patients. This review article compares, discusses and criticizes the approaches to treat BC using novel design strategies and smart targeting of site-specific drug delivery systems.

Treatment Patterns and Adverse Event-Related Hospitalization Among Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Regimens

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are established first-line treatments among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Upon EGFR TKI resistance, there are scant data supporting a standard of care in subsequent lines of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and adverse events associated with hospitalization in later lines of therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of administrative claims included adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who initiated a next line of therapy (index line of therapy) following EGFR TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy discontinuation on/after 1 November, 2015. Treatment regimens and adverse event rates during the index line of therapy were described.

RESULTS

Among 195 eligible patients (median age: 59 years; female: 60%), the five most common index line of therapy regimens were immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (29%), EGFR TKI monotherapy (21%), platinum-based chemotherapy (19%), non-platinum-chemotherapy (13%), and EGFR TKI combinations (9%). The overall median (95% confidence interval) time to discontinuation of the index line of therapy was 2.8 (2.1-3.2) months. Common adverse events associated with hospitalizations included infection/sepsis, pneumonia/pneumonitis, and anemia (2.9, 2.8, and 2.0 per 100 person-months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among EGFR TKI-resistant patients who discontinued platinum-based chemotherapy, the duration of the next line of therapy was short, treatment was highly variable, and re-treatment with EGFR TKIs and platinum-based regimens was common, suggesting a lack of standard of care in later lines. Adverse event rates associated with hospitalization were high, especially among platinum-treated patients. These results underscore the unmet need for new therapies in a later line of treatment to reduce the clinical burden among patients in this population.

Maintenance Treatment for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Balancing Therapeutic Intensity with Tolerable Toxicity

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is typically treated with multi-agent chemotherapy until disease progression or intolerable cumulative toxicity. For patients whose disease shows ongoing control or response beyond a certain timeframe (≥3-4 months), options include pausing chemotherapy with close monitoring or de-escalating to maintenance therapy with the goal of prolonging progression-free and overall survival while preserving quality of life. There is currently no universally accepted standard of care and a relative dearth of randomized clinical trials in the maintenance setting. Conceptually, such therapy can entail continuing the least toxic components of a first-line regimen and/or introducing novel agent(s) such as the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib, which is presently the only approved drug for maintenance treatment and is limited to a genetically defined subset of patients. In addition to identifying new therapeutic candidates and combinations in the maintenance setting, including targeted agents and immunotherapies, future research should focus on better understanding this unique biologic niche and how treatment in the maintenance setting may be distinct from resistant/refractory disease; identifying molecular predictors for more effective pairing of specific treatments with patients most likely to benefit; and establishing patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials to ensure accurate capture of quality of life metrics.

Clinical trial designs for evaluating and exploiting cancer evolution

The evolution of drug-resistant cell subpopulations causes cancer treatment failure. Current preclinical evidence shows that it is possible to model herding of clonal evolution and collateral sensitivity where an initial treatment could favourably influence the response to a subsequent one. Novel therapy strategies exploiting this understanding are being considered, and clinical trial designs for steering cancer evolution are needed. Furthermore, preclinical evidence suggests that different subsets of drug-sensitive and resistant clones could compete between themselves for nutrients/blood supply, and clones that populate a tumour do so at the expense of other clones. Treatment paradigms based on this clinical application of exploiting cell-cell competition include intermittent dosing regimens or cycling different treatments before progression. This will require clinical trial designs different from the conventional practice of evaluating responses to individual therapy regimens. Next-generation sequencing to assess clonal dynamics longitudinally will improve current radiological assessment of clinical response/resistance and be incorporated into trials exploiting evolution. Furthermore, if understood, clonal evolution can be used to therapeutic advantage, improving patient outcomes based on a new generation of clinical trials.

Long non-coding RNA DSCAS regulates cisplatin sensitivity in lung squamous cell carcinoma by competitively binding to miR-646-3p

Background

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the main treatment for advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Eventually, patients with LUSC develop resistance to cisplatin, which affects the prognosis. Hence, the researchers sought to find a lncRNA in LUSC that affects resistance to cisplatin.

Methods

The lncRNA microarray assay was used to screen the differential expression of lncRNA. qPCR was used to detect lncRNA DSCAS (DSCAS) expression in tissues and cell lines. Lentiviral transfection was used to regulate the expression of DSCAS. CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, transwell, and flow cytometry assays were used to assess the biological behaviors and sensitivity to cisplatin of LUSC cell. RNA-RNA interaction was tested using the dual luciferase reporting assay, RNA-IP, and RNA-RNA pull-down assay. The downstream pathway of DSCAS was verified by qPCR and Western blotting assays.

Results

DSCAS was highly expressed in LUSC tissues and cells, and its expression levels were higher in cisplatin-insensitive tissues than in cisplatin-sensitive tissues. Elevation of DSCAS promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion as well as increased cisplatin resistance of lung cancer cells, while demotion of DSCAS inhibited cell proliferation, migration and invasion as well as decreased the cisplatin resistance of lung cancer cells. DSCAS bound to miR-646-3p to regulate the expression of Bcl-2 and Survivin, which affected the cell apoptosis and sensitivity to cisplatin in LUSC cells.

Conclusions

DSCAS regulates biological behavior and cisplatin sensitivity in LUSC cells by competitively binding to miR-646-3p to mediate the expression of Survivin and Bcl-2, known as apoptosis-related proteins.

Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Comprehensive genome profiling in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: the precision medicine phase 2 randomized SAFIR02-Lung trial

PURPOSE

Targeted therapies (TT) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) have revolutionized the approach to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment in the era of precision medicine. Their impact as switch maintenance therapy based on molecular characterization is unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

SAFIR02-Lung was an open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, involving 33 centers in France. We investigated eight TT (substudy-1) and one ICB (substudy-2), compared to standard-of-care as a maintenance strategy in advanced EGFR, ALK wild-type (wt) NSCLC patients without progression after first line chemotherapy, based on high-throughput genome analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among the 175 patients randomized in substudy-1, 116 received TT (selumetinib, vistusertib, capivasertib, AZD4547, AZD8931, vandetanib, olaparib, savolitinib) and 59 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.6-2.9) with TT vs. 2.7 months (1.6-4.1) with standard-of-care (HR 0.97, 0.7-1.36; p=0.87). There were no significant differences in PFS within any molecular subgroup. In substudy-2, 183 patients were randomized, 121 received durvalumab and 62 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 3.0 months (2.3-4.4) with durvalumab versus 3.0 months (2.0-5.1) with standard-of-care (HR=0.86; 0.62-1.20; p=0.38). Preplanned subgroup analysis showed an enhanced benefit with durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 1%, (n=29, HR=0.29; 0.11-0.75) as compared to PD-L1 <1% (n=31, HR=0.71, 0.31-1.60, interaction p= 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular profiling can feasibly be implemented to guide treatment choice for the maintenance strategy in EGFR/ALK wt NSCLC; in the current study it did not lead to substantial treatment benefits beyond durvalumab for PD-L1 ≥ 1 patients.

The Relationship Between Short-Term Surrogate Endpoint Indicators and mPFS and mOS in Clinical Trials of Malignant Tumors: A Case Study of Approved Molecular Targeted Drugs for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China

Objective: Due to the initiation of the priority review program in China, many antitumor drugs have been approved for marketing based on phase II clinical trials and short-term surrogate endpoint indicators. This study used approved targeted drugs for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China as an example to evaluate the association between short-term surrogate endpoints [objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR)] and median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS).

Methods: Five databases, i.e., MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched, for phase II or phase III clinical trials of all molecular targeted drugs that have been marketed in China for the treatment of NSCLC. After screening the literature and extracting information, both univariate and multivariate linear regression were performed on the short-term surrogate indicators and mPFS and mOS to explore the relationship.

Results: A total of 63 studies were included (25 studies with only ORR, DCR, and mPFS and 39 studies with ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS). In terms of the targeted drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, in addition to the good but not excellent linear relationship between DCR and mOS (0.4 < R²_adj = 0.5653 < 0.6), all other short-term surrogate endpoint indicators had excellent linear relationships with mPFS and mOS (R²_adj≥0.6), while mPFS and mOS had the most excellent linear relationships (R²_adj = 0.8036).

Conclusion: For targeted drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, short-term surrogate endpoint indicators such as ORR and DCR may be reliable surrogate indicators for mPFS and mOS. However, whether short-term surrogate endpoint indicators can be used to predict final endpoints remains to be verified.

Real-World Pattern of Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Single Academic Centre in Quebec

The discovery of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of EGFR mutant (EGFRm) metastatic NSCLC is regarded as a landmark in lung cancer. EGFR-TKIs have now become a standard first-line treatment for EGFRm NSCLC. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to describe real-world patterns of treatment and treatment outcomes in patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI therapy outside of clinical trials. One hundred and seventy EGFRm metastatic NSCLC patients were diagnosed and initiated on first-line TKI therapy between 2004 and 2018 at the Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre in Montreal. Following progression of the disease, 137 (80%) patients discontinued first-line treatment. Moreover, 80/137 (58%) patients received second-line treatment, which included: EGFR-TKIs, platinum-based, or single-agent chemotherapy. At the time of progression on first-line treatment, 73 patients were tested for the T790M mutation. Moreover, 30/73 (41%) patients were found to be positive for the T790M mutation; 62/80 patients progressed to second-line treatment and 20/62 were started on third-line treatment. The median duration of treatment was 11.5 (95% CI; 9.62–13.44) months for first-line treatment, and 4.4 (95% CI: 1.47–7.39) months for second-line treatment. Median OS from the time of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 23.5 months (95% CI: 16.9–30.1) and median OS from the initiation of EGFR-TKI was 20.6 months (95% CI: 13.5–27.6). We identified that ECOG PS ≤ 2, presence of exon 19 deletion mutation, and absence of brain metastases were associated with better OS. A significant OS benefit was observed in patients treated with osimertinib in second-line treatment compared to those who never received osimertinib. Overall, our retrospective observational study suggests that treatment outcomes in EGFRm NSCLC in real-world practice, such as OS and PFS, reflect the result of RCTs. However, given the few observational studies on real-world treatment patterns of EGFR-mutant NSCLC, this study is important for understanding the potential impact of EGFR-TKIs on survival outside of clinical trials. Further real-world studies are needed to characterize patient outcomes for emerging therapies, including first-line osimertinib use and combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy and potential future combination of osimertinib and novel anticancer drug, outside of a clinical trial setting.

Tailoring maintenance chemotherapy upon response to induction chemotherapy as compared with pemetrexed continuation maintenance in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients: Results of the IFCT-GFPC-1101 multicenter randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Benefit from maintenance in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) might favor switch maintenance after disease stabilization (SD) and continuation after objective response (OR). This trial assessed a maintenance strategy conditioned by response to cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) with G continuation for patients with OR or switch to pemetrexed (P) for patients with SD as compared with a control arm based on the Paramount regimen.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria: age 18-70 years, ECOG PS 0-1, untreated stage IV NS-NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alteration, ineligibility to bevacizumab. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either CG (4 cycles) followed by G maintenance in case of OR followed by P at progression, or switch to P for patients with SD, or 4 cycles of CP followed by P (control arm). Primary endpoint: overall Survival.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2016, 932 patients were randomized (CG: 467, CP: 465) with well-balanced characteristics. 257 patients (56.7%) in the CG arm received maintenance (G: 142, P: 113) versus 277 patients (59.7%) in the CP arm. Median number of maintenance cycles was 5 for G and P (CG induction) and 4 for P (CP induction). OS adjusted HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.84, 1.13; p = 0.71) with a median of 10.9 months (CG) versus 10.4 (CP). HR for PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.83, 1.09; p = 0.45) with a median of 4.8 months for CG versus 4.5 for CP. Safety profile was as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

Adapting maintenance strategy according to response to induction chemotherapy does not improve patient outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT01631136.

Maintenance treatment of combination with bevacizumab vs single agent for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

When the patients of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have achieved remission by induction therapy, it is controversial that combination with bevacizumab is used as maintenance therapy. Pemetrexed is a classic drug for maintenance therapy, is bevacizumab the superiority to pemetrexed is also unclear. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of advanced non-squamous NSCLC in the maintenance treatment.

METHOD

From the establishment as of December 6, 2020, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched and the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network databases in the past 10 years. The application of combination with bevacizumab, pemetrexed was studied in clinical trials of maintenance treatment for advanced NSCLC. The extracted data include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3-4 adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials we screened, 6 were phase III RCTs, and a cohort trial, including 3298 patients. Compared with bevacizumab and pemetrexed, PFS of combination with bevacizumab was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65-0.77, P < .00001), but OS was not improved (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.85-1.01, P = .10). Compared with bevacizumab and pemetrexed, no significant difference of PFS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69-1.09, P = .21), and OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.72-1.05, P = .15) was found. A higher incidence of grade 3-4 AE occurred in combination with bevacizumab (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.35-1.97, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

PFS was significantly improved in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who use bevacizumab combination with single-agent as maintenance treatment, but it does not translate into the advantages of OS; compared with bevacizumab, no PFS and OS benefits were found. A higher incidence of grade 3-4 AE occurred in combination with bevacizumab than pemetrexed and bevacizumab.

Identification of microRNAs that promote erlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, demanding improvement in current treatment modalities to reduce the mortality rates. Lung cancer is divided into two major classes with non-small cell lung cancer representing ~84% of lung cancer cases. One strategy widely used to treat non-small cell lung cancer patients includes targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using EGFR-inhibitors, such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib. However, most patients develop resistance to EGFR-inhibitors within a year post-treatment. Although some mechanisms that drive resistance to EGFR-inhibitors have been identified, there are many cases in which the mechanisms are unknown. Thus, in this study, we examined the role of microRNAs in driving EGFR-inhibitor resistance. As mediators of critical pro-growth pathways, microRNAs are severely dysregulated in multiple diseases, including non-small cell lung cancer where microRNA dysregulation also contributes to drug resistance. In this work, through screening of 2019 mature microRNAs, multiple microRNAs were identified that drive EGFR-inhibitor resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, including miR-432-5p.

Nephrotoxicity as a Complication of Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer, Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of many medical procedures, including those used in cancer treatment. Both chemotherapy and immunotherapy may result in deterioration of kidney function, which may lead to an increase in mortality among patients with cancer. Antineoplastic agents can affect any element of the nephron, leading to the appearance of clinical symptoms such as proteinuria, hypertension, electrolyte disorders, glomerulonephritis, acute and chronic interstitial nephritis and acute kidney injury. The medical literature describing renal complications occurring during chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic treatment in neoplasms, such as colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, was analysed. The immune system plays an important role in controlling the development of neoplasms and fighting them. Oncological treatment algorithms include immunotherapy as monotherapy, combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy as monotherapy. In the treatment of the above-mentioned neoplasms immunotherapeutics are used, such as checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) (i.e., ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (i.e., bevacizumab, ramucirumab) and a variety of chemotherapeutic agents (irinotecan, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, gefitinib, erlotinib, gemcitabine, cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, doclitaxel, vinorelbine, topotecan, etoposide). In our article, we focused on the number and type of renal complications as well as on the time of their manifestation when using specific treatment regimens. Our analysis also includes case reports. We discussed treatment of immunological complications and adjustments of the dose of chemotherapeutic agents depending on the creatinine clearance. Analysing the data from the literature, when two immunotherapeutic agents are used together, the number of recorded renal complications increases. Bevacizumab and ramucirumab are the cause of the largest number of renal complications among the immunotherapeutic agents described above. Cisplatin is the best-described substance with the greatest nephrotoxic potential among the chemotherapeutic agents. Crucial for renal complications are also cancer stage, previous chemotherapy and other risk factors of AKI such as age, comorbidities and medications used. Due to the described complications during oncological treatment, including kidney damage, it seems necessary to elaborate standards of cooperation between oncologists and nephrologists both during and after treatment of a patient with cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research and develop algorithms for management of a cancer patient, especially during such an intensive progress in oncology.

Switch-maintenance gemcitabine after first-line chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma (NVALT19): an investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Almost all patients with malignant mesothelioma eventually have disease progression after first-line therapy. Previous studies have investigated maintenance therapy, but none has shown a great effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of switch-maintenance gemcitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 18 hospitals in the Netherlands (NVALT19). We recruited patients aged older than 18 years with unresectable malignant mesothelioma with no evidence of disease progression after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy (with platinum and pemetrexed), who had a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and measurable or evaluable disease. Exclusion criteria were active uncontrolled infection or severe cardiac dysfunction, serious disabling conditions, symptomatic CNS metastases, radiotherapy within 2 weeks before enrolment, and concomitant use of any other drugs under investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to maintenance intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, in cycles of 21 days) plus supportive care, or to best supportive care alone, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious intercurrent illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent, except for palliative radiotherapy. A CT scan of the thorax or abdomen (or both) and pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and repeated every 6 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all participants who received one or more doses of the study drug or had at least one visit for supportive care. Recruitment is now closed; treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR4132/NL3847.

FINDINGS

Between March 20, 2014, and Feb 27, 2019, 130 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus supportive care (65 patients [50%]) or supportive care alone (65 patients [50%]). No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up was 36·5 months (95% CI 34·2 to not reached), and one patient in the supportive care group withdrew consent. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gemcitabine group (median 6·2 months [95% CI 4·6-8·7]) than in the supportive care group (3·2 months [2·8-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·71]; p=0·0002). The benefit was confirmed by masked independent central review (HR 0·49 [0·33-0·72]; p=0·0002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (52%) of 64 patients in the gemcitabine group and in ten (16%) of 62 patients in the supportive care group. The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, fatigue or asthenia, pain, and infection in the gemcitabine group, and pain, infection, and cough or dyspnoea in the supportive care group. One patient (2%) in the gemcitabine group died, due to a treatment-related infection.

INTERPRETATION

Switch-maintenance gemcitabine, after first-line chemotherapy, significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with malignant mesothelioma. This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in treating malignant mesothelioma.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding) and Stichting NVALT studies.

[Progress in Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer ranks first both in mobidity and motality in china and worldwild. Squamous cell lung carcinoma is distinguished from lung adenocarcinoma in diagnosis and treatment due to its unique clinical & pathological manifestations and gene mutation characteristics, as a result, it is also explored as a separate type in clinical researches. In addition to the clinical manifestations of elderly, central tumors, late staging at diagnosis, and multiple comorbidities, the lack of driver genes makes it nearly impossible for these patients to benefit from targeted therapy. However, the exploration of targeted therapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma has never stopped. Several new drugs including fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors have been studied in multiple phase I studies specifically in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. However, with the development of immunotherapy, the characteristics such as complex gene mutation and high tumor mutation burden makes it possible for patients with squamous cell lung cancer to benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. This review will provide an overview of the treatment progress in advanced squamous cell lung cancer including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy.
.

Real world experience on maintenance chemotherapy with gemcitabine in second line setting for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Maintenance chemotherapy was studied in first line setting for advanced stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). There has not been any data on the role of continuation maintenance chemotherapy in second line setting. A retrospective cohort study that included 226 patients with advanced stage NSCLC that received second line gemcitabine ± platinum was conducted. Patients who had continuation maintenance gemcitabine were compared with those who went on drug holiday. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), counted from the end of induction therapy. The median PFS was significantly longer for patients who continued with maintenance gemcitabine when compared with those on drug holiday (5.6 vs 1.7 months, HR 0.392, p-value < 0.001). The overall survival was also significantly longer (21.4 vs 15.8 months, HR 0.508, p-value 0.047). There was no increase in incidence of adverse events for patients who underwent maintenance gemcitabine. Continuation maintenance therapy with gemcitabine in second line setting is a potentially feasible and safe option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Treatment Approaches and the Role of Afatinib

Options for the treatment of squamous cell lung carcinoma expanded in recent years with the introduction of the immune checkpoint inhibitors into routine clinical practice in both the first- and second-line settings but are still limited. As a result, pembrolizumab, given either alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, is now a standard first-line treatment for squamous cell lung cancer. However, few options exist once patients have progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy. In this setting, the irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib, has a potential role as second or subsequent therapy for some patients. The Phase III LUX-Lung 8 study demonstrated that afatinib significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival compared with erlotinib in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma. Notably, retrospective, ad-hoc biomarker analyses of a subset of patients from LUX-Lung 8 suggested that patients with ErbB family mutations derived particular benefit from afatinib, especially those with ErbB2 (HER2) mutations. Afatinib has a manageable and predictable safety profile, and adverse events can be managed with the use of a tolerability-guided dose modification protocol. Until more data are available, afatinib could be considered as a potential second-line treatment option for patients who have progressed on combined pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy and are ineligible for more established second-line options, or as a third-line option in patients who have received first-line immunotherapy, and second-line chemotherapy or chemotherapy and antiangiogenesis therapy. However, further data are required to support the use of afatinib following immunotherapy. Given that treatment options are limited in both of these settings, investigating an agent with an entirely new mechanism of action is warranted. If available, molecular analysis to identify ErbB family mutations or the use of proteomic profiling could help to further isolate patients who are likely to derive the most benefit from afatinib.

Switch maintenance chemotherapy versus observation after carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: IFCT-1201 MODEL trial

PURPOSE

Maintenance chemotherapy is a reasonable choice for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) not progressing after induction therapy with a platinum-based doublet. Nevertheless, there have been no studies dedicated to elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomised trial in patients aged 70-89 years, with advanced NSCLC (with neither EGFR mutation nor ALK rearrangement), who had not progressed after four cycles of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in order to compare maintenance with either pemetrexed (500 mg/m² d1, 22) in patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma or gemcitabine (1,150 mg/m² d1, 8, 22) in squamous cell carcinoma to simple observation. The patients were required to have a performance status (PS) 0-2, mini-mental score >23, and creatinine clearance ≥45 mL/min. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

632 patients were enrolled from May 2013 to October 2016. Of the 328 (52.3%) patients randomised after induction therapy, 166 patients were assigned to the observation arm, versus 162 to the switch maintenance arm, 119 of whom received pemetrexed and 43 gemcitabine. The median OS from randomisation was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0-17.0) in the observation arm and 14 months (95% CI: 10.9-16.9) in the maintenance arm (p = 0.72). The median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomisation was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-3.1) in the observation arm versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.1) in the maintenance arm (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Switch maintenance therapy significantly prolonged PFS but not OS and, thus, should not be proposed to elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Impact of Sex and Smoking on the Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in Terms of Overall Survival in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: To comprehensively understand the impact of sex and smoking on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in terms of overall survival (OS) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 17, 2019. OS was analyzed based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and estimated using the random effects model.

Results: Our meta-analysis included 22 studies involving 11,874 patients. In the primary analysis, we found no statistically significant efficacy difference for EGFR-TKI intervention between females and males (pooled HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87–1.04, P = 0.30) and no obvious efficacy difference between never smokers and ever smokers (pooled HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76–1.09, P = 0.31). In the subgroup analysis of placebo control treatment, we found that female NSCLC patients who received EGFR-TKI therapy had a longer OS than male patients (pooled HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–1.00, P = 0.04), while smoking status showed no significant effect on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment in terms of the OS of NSCLC patients in all subgroup analyses.

Conclusion: The efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy for NSCLC patients is independent of smoking status but dependent on sex, and females have a longer OS than males.

Eye, hepatobiliary, and renal disorders of erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Skin rash and diarrhea are well-known and common adverse events in patients receiving erlotinib, whereas other adverse events, including eye, liver, or renal disorders have not been evaluated adequately. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the ocular, hepatobiliary, and renal toxicities of erlotinib in patients with NSCLC cancers.

Methods

In total, sixty studies were assessed, and the results of the included studies were quantitatively integrated using meta-analysis. The incidence of ocular, hepatobiliary (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and bilirubin elevations; other hepatic adverse events), and renal adverse events were estimated. Additionally, the erlotinib-treated groups and the control groups (placebo or other treatment) were compared with respect to ocular disorders and ALT elevation. The study protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42018093758.

Results

The overall incidence of ocular disorders was 3.30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.20%–5.00%). The incidence of ALT elevation, bilirubin elevation, and other hepatobiliary disorders was 6.40% (95% CI 3.90%–10.4%), 3.80% (95% CI 2.30%–6.10%), and 1.00% (95% 0.60%–1.80%), respectively. The incidence of renal disorder was 3.10% (95% CI 1.90%–5.00%). The risk of ocular toxicity in the erlotinib treatment group was significantly increased (risk ratio = 2.91; 95% CI 1.70–4.98) compared to that in the control group. ALT elevation was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

Based on the results, careful monitoring of ocular toxicity in patients receiving erlotinib should be recommended and closer monitoring of hepatic toxicity should be also recommended in patients with liver-related risk factors.

Doublet vs Single-Agent Maintenance Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Several published meta-analyses have confirmed that single-agent maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can prolong time to disease progression and potentially increase overall survival (OS) in comparison to placebo. However, whether doublet maintenance therapy can improve the survival of advanced NSCLC remains undetermined.

Methods

We searched several databases for relevant trials. Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing doublet vs single-agent maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients were included for analysis. Outcomes of interest were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities.

Results

A total of 1,950 advanced-NSCLC patients from six trials were included for analysis. Our results showed that doublet maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59–0.93; P=0.010), but not for OS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85–1.07; P=0.40) in comparison with single-agent maintenance therapy. Subgroup analysis by maintenance regimen showed that pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS, but not OS. In addition, there was no significant risk difference between doublet and single-agent maintenance therapy in terms of grade 3/4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that doublet maintenance therapy in advanced-NSCLC patients demonstrates PFS benefits, but not OS benefits, in comparison with single-agent maintenance therapy. Future trials are suggested to assess the long-term clinical benefit of doublet maintenance treatment in NSCLC patients and its impact on health-related quality of life.

First-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Treatment of advanced-stage or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, which can now be treated with molecularly targeted therapies, had been based on cytotoxic chemotherapy for a long time. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably antibodies directed against programmed cell-death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have transformed therapeutic standards in thoracic oncology. These ICIs are now the reference second-line treatment and numerous phase III trials have examined their efficacy in treatment-naïve patients. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was validated for patients with ≥ 50% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1; pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and nivolumab have obtained good outcomes in combination with chemotherapy or another immunotherapy. However, in this context, other phase III trials yielded negative findings for nivolumab alone (CheckMate-026) or in combination (MYSTIC trial). Biomarkers, such as PD-L1 and the tumor mutation burden (TMB), enable better selection of patients who should benefit the most from first-line ICI use.

Efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis

Background: Single agent maintenance therapy has been approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its potential survival benefits, but whether combined maintenance therapy would improve the survival of advanced NSCLC remains undetermined.

Methods: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing combination maintenance therapy in advanced NSCLC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3–4 toxicities.

Results: A total of 1950 advanced NSCLC patients received combination maintenance treatment from six trials were included for analysis. The use of doublet maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.59–0.93, P = 0.010), but not for OS (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.85–1.07, P = 0.40) in comparison with single agent maintenance therapy. Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. In addition, there was no significantly risk difference between doublet and single agent maintenance therapy in terms of grade 3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities.

Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that doublet combination maintenance therapy is superior to single agent maintenance therapy in terms of PFS, without increased grade 3–4 toxicities. Future prospective studies are recommended to clearly assess the long-term clinical benefit of doublet maintenance therapy and its impact on health-related quality of life.

Salvage surgery after definitive chemo-radiotherapy for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite all treatment advances, lung cancer is still the main cause of death worldwide. Treatment for resectable stage IIIA remains controversial including definitive chemoradiotherapy and induction treatment followed by surgery. After definitive chemoradiation up to 35% of patients will relapse locally. Experience with salvage resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy in lung cancer is limited. We present our experience in 27 patients who underwent surgical resection after definitive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2016, 27 patients were evaluated in our department for surgical resection after receiving definitive chemoradiation treatment in different institutions. We conducted a retrospective study gathering the following data: age, gender, clinical and pathologic stage, histology, chemotherapy treatment regimen, radiotherapy dosage, surgical procedure and complications. Time between surgical resection and last follow-up was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS). Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated from surgical resection to diagnosis of relapse.

RESULTS

Most of the patients were men with a median age of 56.09 years. Median follow-up time was 46.94 months. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and high-dose radiotherapy, except for one patient who received 45 Gy. Lobectomy and bilobectomy was performed in 7 patients each, and pneumonectomy in 13. Complications appeared in 5 patients. Bronchopleural fistula appeared in two patients, and only one death in the early postoperative period. The analysis showed an OS of 75.56 months, with 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival of 74.1%, 57.8% and 53.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Salvage surgery in selected patients is technically feasible, with low morbidity and mortality rates and good long-term outcomes.

Defining aggressive or early progressing nononcogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: a separate disease entity?

A substantial proportion of patients with nononcogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has 'aggressive disease', as reflected in short time to progression or lack of disease control with initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, clinical correlates of aggressive disease behavior during first-line therapy have been shown to predict greater benefit from addition of nintedanib to second-line docetaxel in adenocarcinoma NSCLC. Positive predictive effects of aggressive disease have since been reported with other anti-angiogenic agents (ramucirumab and bevacizumab), while such features may negatively impact on outcomes with nivolumab in nonsquamous NSCLC with low PD-L1 expression. Based on a review of the clinical data, we recommend aggressive nonsquamous NSCLC should be defined by progression within <6-9 months of first-line treatment initiation.

Do we Need Maintenance Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC in the Era of Immune and Targeted Therapy?

Background:

Although well established for the effective management of hematologic cancers, maintenance chemotherapy has only been recently incorportated as a treatment paradigm for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Maintenance chemotherapy aims to prolong a clinically favorable response state achieved after finishing induction therapy which is usually predefined in number before startng treatment. There are 2 modalities for maintenance therapy; continuation maintenance (involving a non-platinum component which was a part of the induction protocol or a targeted agent) and switch maintenance therapy (utilizing a new agent which was not a part of the induction regimen).

Methods:

The purpose of this article is to review the role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and provide a brief overview about induction chemotherapy in NSCLC to address the basis of maintenance therapy as a treatment option. We will also compare the impact of maintenance chemotherapy with the now evolving role of immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Results:

There have been 4 maintenance studies to date showing prolonged PFS and OS with statistical significance. However, Three out of the four studies (ECOG4599, JMEN, and PARAMOUNT) did not report tumor molecular analysis. As regard Immunotherapy, current data is in favour of strongly an increasing role for immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Conclusion:

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC continues to be an important therapeutic line to improve outcome in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease.

Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a CSCO-ESMO initiative endorsed by JSMO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was published in 2016. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group Annual Meeting 2018, in Guangzhou, China. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic NSCLC cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the six participating Asian countries. During the review process, the updated ESMO 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for metastatic NSCLC were released and were also considered, during the final stages of the development of the Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Maintenance Chemotherapy With Chinese Herb Medicine Formulas vs. With Placebo in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Background: Chinese Herb Medicine Formulas (CHMF) was reported to improve the quality of life (QoL) in advanced NSCLC patients. The present study was designed to investigate whether maintenance chemotherapy plus CHMF in patients would improve QoL and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Seventy-one patients were enrolled from 8 medical centers in China, and were randomly assigned to a maintenance chemotherapy plus CHMF group (n = 35) or a maintenance chemotherapy plus placebo group (n = 36). The outcome measures included PFS, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores, QoL (assessed with the lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS) questionnaire), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Patients in the CHMF group showed significant improvements in median PFS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-0.88, P = 0.019), KPS scores (P = 0.047), fatigue (cycle [C] 3: P = 0.03), interference with daily activities (C3: P = 0.04) and dyspnea (C2: P = 0.03) compared with patients in the placebo group. Compared with the placebo group, the incidence of AEs decreased in the CHMF group, including loss of appetite (C2: P = 0.011, C4: P = 0.004) and dry mouth (C4: P = 0.011). Conclusion: The essential finding of our study is that maintenance chemotherapy combined with CHMF may prolong PFS, relieve symptoms, improve QoL and alleviate the side effects.

Long-term clinical response of advanced lung adenocarcinoma to maintenance treatment of gemcitabine: A case report

RATIONALE

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive malignancy that generally leads to poor outcomes, with <5% long-term survival at 5 years; however, several researches have shown improvements in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the maintenance therapy after the first-line chemotherapy. we report a case of metastatic NSCLC patient treated with maintenance therapy of gemcitabine with brilliant results.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Clinical data and treatment of a 68-year-old man with NSCLC are summarized. The Ethics Committee of People's hospital of Leshan, approved this study.

DIAGNOSIS

Lung adenocarcinoma metastasized to the mediastinal lymph node, cervical lymph node, and adrenal gland, without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.

INTERVENTIONS

Continued treatment with gemcitabine alone following the 6 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy, prolonging the interval of chemotherapy when he could not tolerate the toxicity of the drug.

OUTCOMES

Partial response of the disease for 4.5 years and significant clinical benefit.

LESSONS

This case shows that patients will benefit from the maintenance therapy, and gemcitabine may be a good choice.

A phase II study of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab followed by erlotinib and bevacizumab maintenance for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type EGFR (HOT1101)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switch maintenance erlotinib and bevacizumab after induction therapy with carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with wild-type EGFR.

METHODS

Enrolled patients had treatment-naïve, advanced non-squamous NSCLC with wild-type EGFR. Carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5.0], pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) were administered on day 1 every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles. Maintenance therapy with erlotinib (150 mg/body) on day 1 through 21 plus bevacizumab on day 1 every 3 weeks was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled between September 2011 and June 2014. The median number of cycles for induction and maintenance therapy was 4 (range 1-6) and 4 (range 1-20). Twenty-nine patients (58%) received maintenance therapy. The 6-month PFS rate was 59.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0-72.6%]. The ORR was 48.0% (95% CI 34.8-61.5%), and disease control rate was 86.0% (95% CI 73.8-93.0%). The median PFS and OS were 6.5 months (95% CI 5.8-7.2 months) and 21.4 months (95% CI 15.9-26.9 months), respectively. Although grades ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 33 patients (66.0%), most were hematologic; there was no febrile neutropenia. QOL was maintained throughout treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab followed by erlotinib and bevacizumab maintenance showed modest efficacy and was well tolerated in non-squamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000005872.

Switch maintenance therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab after induction therapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Switch maintenance therapy, using alternative agents that were not administered during induction chemotherapy, is a treatment option for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is known to increase the efficacy of other chemotherapeutic agents; however, switch maintenance therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab has not been adequately studied. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switch maintenance therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab following induction therapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab. Chemotherapy-naïve non-squamous NSCLC patients received induction therapy of four cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m²), pemetrexed (500 mg/m²), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Patients who achieved disease control after induction therapy then received maintenance therapy with docetaxel (50 mg/m²) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from enrollment. This study enrolled 49 NSCLC patients, among which 38 (77.6%) completed the four cycles of induction therapy and received maintenance therapy. The median progression-free survival from enrollment was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval: 4.7-11.0 months). The most common toxicities of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (68.4%), leukopenia (50.0%), febrile neutropenia (31.8%), and hypertension. Switch maintenance therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab following induction therapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab demonstrated modest efficacy and frequent hematologic toxicity in non-squamous NSCLC patients.

The Role of Combination Maintenance with Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab for Advanced Stage Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of combination maintenance therapy of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

We identified relevant studies by electronic search (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science from 1 January 1960 to 29 October 2016) and manual search. The primary outcome of interest was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary end point included overall survival (OS) and toxicities. The data was pooled for quantitative analysis and the final effect size was reported as hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes and relative risk (RR) for safety outcomes, both with a random-effects model.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials enrolling 1302 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were included in this meta-analysis. An evident PFS improvement (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63–0.83, P < 0.01) was observed in patients with pemetrexed and bevacizumab combination maintenance therapy compared with single-agent maintenance therapy, yet it did not subsequently lead to a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.84–1.10, P = 0.66). Our analysis also showed statistically increased risks for provoking grade 3-4 adverse events in patients managed using pemetrexed plus bevacizumab combination (RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.07–2.36, P = 0.022).

Conclusions

Pemetrexed plus bevacizumab combination maintenance therapy leads to significant improvement in PFS but not in OS for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, which also increases the risks of grade 3-4 adverse events. Yet, in view of the limitation of existing studies and this meta-analysis, current evidence is not adequate to support routine use of pemetrexed-bevacizumab maintenance.

Incidence and risk of infections associated with EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Currently, the overall incidence and risk of infections with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remained undetermined. We searched Pubmed for related articles published from 1 January 1990 to 31 November 2015. Eligible studies included prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating therapy with or without EGFR-TKIs in patients with NSCLC. Data on infections were extracted. Pooled incidence, Peto odds ratio (Peto OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 17,420 patients from 25 RCTs were included. The use of EGFR-TKIs significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade infections (Peto OR 1.48, 95%CI: 1.12-1.96, p = 0.006) in NSCLC patients, but not for severe (Peto OR 1.26, 95%CI: 0.96-1.67, p = 0.098) and fatal infections (Peto OR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.43-1.53, p = 0.52). Meta-regression indicated the risk of infections tended to increase with the treatment duration of EGFR-TKIs. No publication of bias was detected. In conclusion, the use of EGFR-TKIs significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade infectious events in NSCLC patients, but not for severe and fatal infections. Clinicians should be aware of the risks of infections with the administration of these drugs in these patients.

Factors associated with the prognosis and long-term survival of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Background

Outcome of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is usually poor, with overall survival ranges from 8-13 months. However, the overall survival is improved to 21-28 months in the era of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors to predict long-term survival in the era of EGFR TKI.

Methods

A total 1,030 patients were studied who had been diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung from January 2005 to December 2009 at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Long-term survivors (LTS) were defined as patients who survived five years or more after the initial diagnosis of stage IV disease. Data on patient age, gender, smoking status, performance status at diagnosis, TNM stage, metastatic pattern, number of metastases, and organs with tumor involvement, EGFR gene mutation status, types of treatment received, EGFR TKI treatment and longest EGFR TKI duration were retrospectively obtained from medical charts. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of long-term survival from collected clinical parameters to predict long-term survival.

Results

In this large retrospective study, we reported a five-year survival of 5.0% among patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung. A total 52 LTS and 978 non-LTS were identified. Patients had more contralateral or pleural/pericardial metastases in the LTS group than in the non-LTS group (51.9% vs. 19.0%, P<0.001), while less extrathoracic spread than in the non-LTS group (42.3% vs. 79.6%, P<0.001). The mutation of the EGFR gene was more frequent in the LTS group than in the non-LTS group (19.2% vs. 7.1%, P=0.006).

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results suggest that an age younger than 60 years, absence of extrathoracic spread and EGFR TKI treatment duration of more than one year play an important role in the long-term for survivors who survive for more than 5 years.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of combination-chemotherapy for lung cancer

Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves a doublet regimen for a number of cycles. For any particular patient, a course of treatment is usually chosen from a large number of combinational protocols with drugs in concomitant or sequential administration. In spite of newer drugs and protocols, half of patients with early disease will live less than five years and 95% of those with advanced disease survive for less than one year. Here, we apply mathematical modeling to simulate tumor response to multiple drug regimens, with the capability to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as metronomic drug administration. We couple pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic intracellular multi-compartment models with a model of vascularized tumor growth, setting input parameters from in vitro data, and using the models to project potential response in vivo. This represents an initial step towards the development of a comprehensive virtual system to evaluate tumor response to combinatorial drug regimens, with the goal to more efficiently identify optimal course of treatment with patient tumor-specific data. We evaluate cisplatin and gemcitabine with clinically-relevant dosages, and simulate four treatment NSCLC scenarios combining MTD and metronomic therapy. This work thus establishes a framework for systematic evaluation of tumor response to combination chemotherapy. The results with the chosen parameter set indicate that although a metronomic regimen may provide advantage over MTD, the combination of these regimens may not necessarily offer improved response. Future model evaluation of chemotherapy possibilities may help to assess their potential value to obtain sustained NSCLC regression for particular patients, with the ultimate goal of optimizing multiple-drug chemotherapy regimens in clinical practice.

[Research Advances of Pan-negative Type of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

近年来随着对肿瘤驱动基因的不断探索和分子检测技术的快速发展，在非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）领域，一系列的驱动基因如EGFR、KRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA、ALK和ROS-1等相继被发现，并逐渐研发出相应的针对特定驱动基因变异的靶向治疗药物，使NSCLC患者的生存得到极大改善。尽管如此，仍有部分NSCLC患者未能检测到任何已知驱动基因变异，称之为pan-negative型NSCLC。本文就pan-negative型NSCLC的概念、临床病理和流行病学特点以及治疗预后等作一综述。

Suppression of the FA pathway combined with CHK1 inhibitor hypersensitize lung cancer cells to gemcitabine

The combination of platinum and gemcitabine is one of the standard regimens in the treatment of advanced lung squamous carcinoma (LSC). Resistance to gemcitabine is main barrier to the successful treatment of LSC. In this study, we showed that suppression of the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway increased the sensitivity of two LSC cell lines SK-MES-1 and KLN205 to gemcitabine. Moreover, we found that the CHK1 pathway and the FA pathway are functionally compensatory in the repair of DNA damage in the LSC cell lines. Inactivation of one of the two pathways led to DNA damage, triggering compensatory activation of other pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrated that FANCD2 depletion combined with CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 significantly potentiated the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine to the two LSC cell lines, compared to individual FANCD2 depletion or MK-8776 treatment. The enhanced effect of gemcitabine-chemosensitization was accompanied by loss of DNA repair function and accumulation of DNA single strand breaks and double strand breaks, in parallel with obvious increase of caspase-3 dependent apoptosis. Our results indicate that the enhancement effect of FANCD2 depletion combined with CHK1 inhibitor in sensitizing the LCS cells to gemcitabine supports the FA pathway and CHK1 as two therapeutic targets for improvement of anti-tumor regimens in treatment of LSC.

Efficacy and Safety of Necitumumab Continuation Therapy in the Phase III SQUIRE Study of Patients With Stage IV Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In a retrospective analysis of the SQUamous NSCLC treatment with the Inhibitor of EGF REceptor (SQUIRE) study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of single-agent necitumumab continuation therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer and in a subpopulation of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 for ≤ 6 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin either with or without necitumumab. Patients who received necitumumab continued receiving single-agent necitumumab until progressive disease (necitumumab continuation). Tissue collection was mandatory in SQUIRE. EGFR protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in a central lab. In this subgroup analysis we compared patients treated with necitumumab monotherapy after completion of ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy with those in the chemotherapy arm who were progression-free and did not discontinue because of adverse events (AEs) after completion of ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy (gemcitabine-cisplatin nonprogressors). The same analysis was done for the subgroup of EGFR-expressing patients (EGFR > 0).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and chemotherapy exposure were well balanced between the necitumumab continuation (n = 261) and gemcitabine-cisplatin nonprogressor (n = 215) arms and in the EGFR-expressing population. Median overall survival (OS) from randomization in the necitumumab with gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin nonprogressor arm was 15.9 versus 15.0 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.05) and median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was 7.4 versus 6.9 months (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06). OS and PFS benefits were similar when assessed from the postinduction period and in EGFR-expressing patients. No new safety findings emerged.

CONCLUSION

There was a consistent treatment effect in favor of necitumumab continuation versus that in gemcitabine-cisplatin nonprogressors, with no unexpected increases in AEs in intention-to-treat as well as EGFR-expressing populations.

Trends and Outcomes of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Omani Patients: Experience at a university hospital

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of lung cancer in Oman has shown a gradual but definitive increase since 2002. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic and epidemiological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at a university hospital in Oman.

METHODS

This study was conducted from January to June 2016. A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients diagnosed with NSCLC presenting to the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Muscat, Oman, between March 2000 and December 2015. Clinical features at presentation and prognostic and predictive markers were reviewed. Kaplan-Meir estimates were used to determine relapse-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients presented to SQUH during the study period. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Overall, 62 patients (59.6%) had adenocarcinomas. Only 12 patients (11.5%) presented in the early stages (I or II) of the disease and the majority of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (27.9%) or 2 (26.0%). The prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations was 27.9%. The median PFS for patients with advanced disease (stages III or IV) was five months and the median OS for all patients was seven months. After five years, 50.0%, 60.0%, 10.0% and 8.0% of patients with disease stages I, II, III and IV, respectively, were alive.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NSCLC in Oman were found to present at an advanced stage. However, patient outcomes were similar to those reported in the USA.