Which hospice patients with cancer are able to die in the setting of their choice? Results of a retrospective cohort study

Attitudes toward end-of-life care and preferred death locations: A latent profile analysis

Older adults' attitudes toward end-of-life (EOL) care significantly affect its utilization. This study explored latent profiles of EOL care attitudes, their characteristics, and relations to prefer death locations among 498 Chinese community-dwelling adults aged 50 and above. Exploratory factor analysis identified four distinct dimensions of EOL care attitudes: "life reflection and legacy," "physical comfort and pain management," "autonomy and decision-making," and "spiritual and religious comfort." Latent profile analysis revealed four latent profiles: "holistic preparers" (40.04%), "physical comfort-focused individuals" (36.11%), "passive respondents" (14.66%), and "autonomy and spiritual-comfort seekers" (9.19%). Factors such as religious belief, education, chronic disease, exposure to cancer death, and caregiving experience predicted latent profile membership. Participants in different latent profiles showed significant differences in preferred death locations, with home and hospital being the most favored places. These findings highlight the diverse attitudes and preferences toward EOL care, providing insights for individualized EOL care planning and resource allocation.

Emergency department discharges directly to hospice: Longitudinal assessment of a streamlined referral program

INTRODUCTION

80 % of Americans wish to die somewhere other than a hospital, and hospice is an essential resource for providing such care. The emergency department (ED) is an important location for identifying patients with end-of-life care needs and providing access to hospice. The objective of this study was to analyze a quality improvement (QI) program designed to increase the number of patients referred directly to hospice from the ED, without the need for an observation stay and without access to in-hospital hospice.

METHODS

We implemented a QI program in September 2021 consisting of three components: (1) clarification and streamlining of referral workflows, (2) staff/provider education on hospice and workflows, and (3) electronic medical record (EMR) tools to facilitate hospice transitions. The primary outcome was the change in monthly ED-to-hospice cases pre- and post-implementation. We also calculated the monthly incidence rate of ED-to-hospice transfers. The secondary outcome was ED length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

202 patients completed ED-to-hospice transfers from January 1, 2019 to February 29, 2024. 98 patients transitioned from the ED to hospice before QI implementation, and 104 patients transitioned after implementation. We observed a slight but insignificant increase in the mean monthly ED-to-hospice cases from 3.16 patients per month pre-implementation to 3.47 patients per month post-implementation (P = 0.46). We found no significant difference in the monthly incidence rate of ED-to-hospice cases before and after implementation (P = 0.78). ED LOS was unaffected (P = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

In this largest study to date on direct ED-to-hospice discharges, a QI program focused on workflow optimization, education, and EMR modification was insufficient to significantly impact ED-to-hospice discharges. Future efforts to increase hospice transitions from the ED should investigate methods to improve patient identification, the impact of in-hospital hospice programs, and coordination with hospital and community teams to support home-based care for those desiring to remain there.

Preferred and Actual Places of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-centre Cohort Study in Japan

Objectives

Achieving a 'good death' is one of the important goals of palliative care. Providing goal-concordant care and an environment tailored to the patient's preferences can contribute to a 'good death'. However, the concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death among advanced cancer patients in Japan is less explored. This study aimed to identify the concordance between patients' preferred and actual places of death and the associated factors among patients with advanced cancer in Japan.

Materials and Methods

Patients with advanced cancer who underwent chemotherapy at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2015 and January 2016 were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. The enrolled patients were asked about their preference for their place of death. The response options were: "Own home," "General ward" and "Palliative care unit (PCU)." We compared the actual place of death with the patient's preference through a follow-up review of the medical records.

Results

A total of 157 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2016. Of these patients, 22.9% (11/48) died at home according to their preference, 64.0% (16/25) in the general ward and 37.9% (11/29) in the PCU. Only thirty-seven (37.3%) patients died where they wanted, based on the comparison between patients' preferences and actual places of death.

Conclusion

The concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death is not high in Japan. Improving concordance between patients' preferences and actual places of death has the potential to improve end-of-life care.

EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood

Background

Whenever possible, a person should die where they feel it is the right place to be. There is substantial global variation in home death percentages but it is unclear whether these differences reflect preferences, and there are major limitations in how the place of death is classified and compared across countries.

Objectives

EOLinPLACE is an international interdisciplinary research project funded by the European Research Council aiming to create a solid base for a ground-breaking international classification tool that will enable the mapping of preferred and actual places towards death.

Design

Mixed-methods observational research.

Methods and analysis

We combine classic methods of developing health classifications with a bottom-up participatory research approach, working with international organizations representing patients and informal carers [International Alliance of Patients' Organizations (IAPO) and Eurocarers]. First, we will conduct an international comparative analysis of existing classification systems and routinely collected death certificate data on place of death. Secondly, we will conduct a mixed-methods study (ethnography followed by longitudinal quantitative study) in four countries (the Netherlands, Portugal, Uganda and the United States), to compare the preferences and experiences of patients with life-threatening conditions and their families. Thirdly, based on the generated evidence, we will build a contemporary classification of dying places; assess its content validity through focus groups with patients, carers and other stakeholders; and evaluate it in a psychometric study to examine construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, data quality and interpretability.

Ethics

Approved by the ethics committee of the University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (CE-068-2022) and committees in each of the participating countries.

Discussion

The findings will provide a deeper understanding of the diversity in individual end-of-life pathways. They will enable key developments such as measurement of progress towards achievement of preferences when care can be planned. The project will open new directions in how to care for the dying.

Trial registration

Research Registry UIN 9213.

Don't Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater: Meta-Analysis of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Cancer Care

CONTEXT

There is ongoing discourse about the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on end-of-life (EOL) care. No meta-analysis exists to clarify ACP's impact on patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between, and moderators of, ACP and aggressive vs. comfort-focused EOL care outcomes among patients with cancer.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed observational/experimental ACP-specific studies that were published between 1990-2022 that focused on samples of patients with cancer. Odds ratios were pooled to estimate overall effects using inverse variance weighting.

RESULTS

Of 8,673 articles, 21 met criteria, representing 33,541 participants and 68 effect sizes (54 aggressive, 14 comfort-focused). ACP was associated with significantly lower odds of chemotherapy, intensive care, hospital admissions, hospice use fewer than seven days, hospital death, and aggressive care composite measures. ACP was associated with 1.51 times greater odds of do-not-resuscitate orders. Other outcomes-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency department admissions, mechanical ventilation, and hospice use-were not impacted. Tests of moderation revealed that the communication components of ACP produced greater reductions in the odds of hospital admissions compared to other components of ACP (e.g., documents); and, observational studies, not experimental, produced greater odds of hospice use.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated mixed evidence of the association between ACP and EOL cancer care, where tests of moderation suggested that the communication components of ACP carry more weight in influencing outcomes. Further disease-specific efforts to clarify models and components of ACP that work and matter to patients and caregivers will advance the field.

Preferred place of death and end-of-life care for adult cancer patients in Iran: A cross-sectional study

Background

More than 50,000 deaths in terms of cancer occur annually in Iranian hospitals. Determining the preferred place of end-of-life care and death for cancer patients in Iran is a quality marker for good end-of-life care and good death. The purpose of this study was to determine the preferred place of end-of-life care and death in cancer patients.

Method

In 2021, the current descriptive cross-sectional investigation was carried out. Using the convenience sample approach, patients were chosen from three Tehran referral hospitals (the capital of Iran). A researcher-made questionnaire with three parts for demographic data, clinical features, and two questions on the choice of the desired location for end-of-life care and the death of cancer patients served as the data collecting instrument. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18. The relationship between the two variables preferred place for end-of-life care and death and other variables was investigated using chi-square, Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression.

Result

The mean age of patients participating in the study was 50.21 ± 13.91. Three hundred ninety (69.6%) of the patients chose home, and 170 (30.4%) patients chose the hospital as the preferred place of end-of-life care. Choosing the home as a preferred place for end-of-life care had a significant relationship with type of care (OR = .613 [95% CI: 0.383–0.982], P = .042), level of education (OR = 2.61 [95% CI: 1.29–5.24], P = 0.007), type of cancer (OR = 1.70 [1.01–2.89], P = .049), and income level (Mediate: (OR: 3.27 (1.49, 7.14), P = .003) and Low: (OR: 3.38 (1.52–7.52), P = .003). Also, 415 (75.2%) patients chose home and 137 (24.8%) patients chose hospital as their preferred place of death. Choosing the home as a preferred place of death had a significant relationship with marriage (OR = 1.62 [95% CI: 1.02–2.57], P = .039) and time to diagnostic disease less than 6 months (OR = 1.62 [95% CI: 0.265–0.765], P = .002).

Conclusion

The findings of the current research indicate that the majority of cancer patients selected their homes as the preferred location for end-of-life care and final disposition. Researchers advise paying more attention to patients’ wishes near the end of life in light of the findings of the current study. This will be achieved by strengthening the home care system using creating appropriate infrastructure, insurance coverage, designing executive instructions, and integration of palliative care in home care services.

Where do Brazilian cancer patients prefer to die? Agreement between patients and caregivers

Preferred place-of-death (PPoD) is considered an important outcome for the development of appropriate models of care and for improving health policies in countries with underdeveloped palliative care (PC) OBJECTIVES: To determine the concordance between the PPoD of a sample of Brazilian seriously-ill cancer patients and their caregivers, and its associated factors under four different end-of-life (EOL) scenarios: 1) health deterioration in the overall context; 2) health deterioration with severe and uncomfortable symptoms; 3) health deterioration receiving home-based visits as needed; 4) health deterioration receiving home-based visits as needed, when suffering severe and uncomfortable symptoms METHODS: Cross-sectional study at a large Brazilian cancer center, between February 2019 and July 2021. 190 adult cancer patients and their caregivers (n = 190) were analyzed RESULTS: Patient and/or caregiver PPoD concordance for EOL scenario one: 64% vs. 43% for death at home, 22% vs. 30% for death in a PC unit, 14% vs. 27% for death in hospital. Higher patient and/or caregiver PPoD concordance was found for death in hospital (41%; 49%) in EOL scenario two, and for death at home for scenario three (77%; 74%). Agreement coefficient was moderate for scenario two (k = 0.430; P < 0.001), and fair for EOL scenarios one, three and four (k = 0.237, P < 0.001; k = 0.296, P < 0.001; k = 0.307, P < 0.001, respectively). Associated disagreement factors were: performance status (OR:3.03), self-perceived health (OR: 6.99), marital status (OR:2.92), and hospital and/or emergency room proximity (OR:4.11). The presence of relevant persons (42.3% vs. 44.2%), followed by spirituality (38.5% vs. 27.9%) and the place-of-death (14.0% vs. 18.4%), were the most important factors in the EOL, when comparing patients and care givers opinions, respectively CONCLUSION: Low agreement between patients and caregivers on PPoD was identified. EOL clinical factors and deterioration, and PC support seem to influence PPoD.

Factors Related to Family Caregivers’ Readiness for the Hospital Discharge of Advanced Cancer Patients

Background: Many family caregivers of advanced cancer patients worry about being unable to provide in-home care and delay the discharge. Little is known about the influencing factors of discharge readiness. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the influencing factors of family caregivers’ readiness, used a cross-sectional survey, and enrolled 123 sets of advanced cancer patients and family caregivers using convenience sampling from four oncology wards in a medical centre in northern Taiwan. A self-developed five-point Likert questionnaire, the “Discharge Care Assessment Scale”, surveyed the family caregivers’ difficulties with providing in-home care. Results: The study showed that the discharge readiness of family caregivers affects whether patients can be discharged home. Moreover, the influencing factors of family caregivers’ discharge readiness were the patient’s physical activity performance status and expressed discharge willingness; the presence of someone to assist family caregivers with in-home care; and the difficulties of in-home care. The best prediction model accuracy was78.0%, and the Nagelkerke R² was 0.52. Conclusion: Discharge planning should start at the point of admission data collection, with the influencing factors of family caregivers’ discharge readiness. It is essential to help patients increase the likelihood of being discharged home.

Hospice delivery models and survival differences in the terminally ill: a large cohort study

OBJECTIVE

A common difficulty at the end of life (EOL) is to determine an appropriate service model, such as hospice share care (HSC), hospice inpatient care (HIC) and hospice home care (HHC). This study aimed to recommend the appropriate hospice delivery model based on the physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs of patients referred for hospice care.

METHODS

This cohort study included patients who received only one kind of hospice delivery model between 2006 and 2020. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, non-parametric analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model that determined the patients' clinical characteristics for a hospice delivery model and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 8874 hospice patients were recruited, of which 7076 (79.7%) were HSC patients, 918 (10.4%) were HIC patients and 880 (9.9%) were HHC patients. There were significant differences in the physical symptoms and demographic, psychosocial and spiritual factors among the three groups (p<0.001). The patients who received the HHC were less to have dyspnoea (18.5%) and dysphagia (28.7%). The HIC patients showed higher severity of symptoms and experienced greater psychosocial distress (73.2%). The HSC is appropriate for noncancer patients . Patients with cancer were associated with less dyspnoea (32.4%) and dysphagia (46.5%). Patients with lung cancer who received the HHC had better survival than those who received other types of hospice care (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.86, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides guidance regarding the appropriate hospice service model, based on individualised palliative needs, targeting improvement in EOL care.

Preferred Place of Death in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Identifying the preferred place of death is a key indicator of the quality of death in cancer patients and one of the most important issues for health service policymakers. This study was done to determine the preferred place of death and the factors affecting it for adult patients with cancer.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, web of science, ProQuest) were searched by relevant keywords. Quality assessment of papers was conducted using Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS) criterion. Odds ratios, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals were determined for each of the factors extracted from the investigations.

Results: A total of 14,920 participants of 27 studies were included into the meta-analysis. Based on the results, 55% of cancer patients with a confidence interval [95% CI (41–49)] preferred home, 17% of patients with a confidence interval [95% CI (−12%) 23)] preferred hospital and 10% of patients with confidence interval [95% CI (13–18)] preferred hospices as their favored place to die. Effective factors were also reported in the form of demographic characteristics, disease-related factors and psychosocial factors.

Conclusions: This study showed that more than half of cancer patients chose home as their preferred place of death. Therefore, guided policies need to ensure that the death of the patients in the preferred place should be considered with priority.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020218680, identifier: CRD42020218680.

What Variables Contribute to the Achievement of a Preferred Home Death for Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care in Canada?

BACKGROUND

Home is often deemed to be the preferred place of death for most patients. Knowing the factors related to the actualization of a preferred home death may yield evidence to enhance the organization and delivery of healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to measure the congruence between a preferred and actualized home death among cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care in Canada and explore predictors of actualizing a preferred home death.

METHODS

A longitudinal prospective cohort design was conducted. A total of 290 caregivers were interviewed biweekly over the course of patients' palliative care trajectory between July 2010 and August 2012. Cross-tabulations and multivariate analyses were used in the analysis.

RESULTS

Home was the most preferred place of death, and 68% of patients who had voiced a preference for home death had their wish fulfilled. Care context variables, such as living with others and the intensity of home-based nursing visits and hours of care provided by personal support workers (PSW), contributed to actualizing a preferred home death. The intensity of emergency department visits was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving a preferred home death.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher intensity of home-based nursing visits and hours of PSW care contribute to the actualization of a preferred home death.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study has implications for policy decision-makers and healthcare managers. Improving and expanding the provision of home-based PSW and nursing services in palliative home care programs may help patients to actualize a preferred home death.

Hospice Care Experiences Among Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the current quality of care for hospice cancer patients and how it varies across hospice programs in the USA.

OBJECTIVE

To examine hospice care experiences among decedents with a primary cancer diagnosis and their family caregivers, comparing quality across settings of hospice care.

DESIGN

We analyzed data from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospice Survey (32% response rate). Top-box outcomes (0-100) were calculated overall and by care setting, adjusting for survey mode and patient case mix.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred seventeen thousand five hundred ninety-six caregiver respondents whose family member had a primary cancer diagnosis and died in 2017 or 2018 while receiving hospice care from 2,890 hospices nationwide.

MAIN MEASURES

Outcomes (0-100 scale) included 8 National Quality Forum-endorsed quality measures, as well as responses to 4 survey questions assessing whether needs were met for specific symptoms (pain, dyspnea, constipation, anxiety/sadness).

KEY RESULTS

Quality measure scores ranged from 74.9 (Getting Hospice Care Training measure) to 89.5 (Treating Family Member with Respect measure). The overall score for Getting Help for Symptoms was 75.1 with item scores within this measure ranging from 60.6 (getting needed help for feelings of anxiety or sadness) to 84.5 (getting needed help for pain). Measure scores varied significantly across settings and differences were large in magnitude, with caregivers of decedents who received care in a nursing home (NH) or assisted living facility (ALF) setting consistently reporting poorer quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Important opportunities exist to improve hospice care for symptom palliation and providing training for caregivers when their family members are at home or in an ALF setting. Efforts to improve care for cancer patients in the NH and ALF setting are especially needed.

Socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban small areas of three Mediterranean cities

BACKGROUND

Dying at home is the most frequent preference of patients with advanced chronic conditions, their caregivers, and the general population. However, most deaths continue to occur in hospitals. The objective of this study was to analyse the socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban areas of Mediterranean cities during the period 2010-2015, and to assess if such inequalities are related to palliative or non-palliative conditions.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of the population aged 15 years or over. The response variable was the place of death (home, hospital, residential care). The explanatory variables were: sex, age, marital status, country of birth, basic cause of death coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, and the deprivation level for each census tract based on a deprivation index calculated using 5 socioeconomic indicators. Multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted in order to analyse the association between the place of death and the explanatory variables.

RESULTS

We analysed a total of 60,748 deaths, 58.5% occurred in hospitals, 32.4% at home, and 9.1% in residential care. Death in hospital was 80% more frequent than at home while death in a nursing home was more than 70% lower than at home. All the variables considered were significantly associated with the place of death, except country of birth, which was not significantly associated with death in residential care. In hospital, the deprivation level of the census tract presented a significant association (p < 0.05) so that the probability of death in hospital vs. home increased as the deprivation level increased. The deprivation level was also significantly associated with death in residential care, but there was no clear trend, showing a more complex association pattern. No significant interaction for deprivation level with cause of death (palliative, not palliative) was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of dying in hospital, as compared to dying at home, increases as the socioeconomic deprivation of the urban area of residence rises, both for palliative and non-palliative causes. Further qualitative research is required to explore the needs and preferences of low-income families who have a terminally-ill family member and, in particular, their attitudes towards home-based and hospital-based death.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated With Place of Death Among Patients With Late-Stage Cancer in Southern Africa

CONTEXT

Identifying factors that affect terminally ill patients' preferences for and actual place of death may assist patients to die wherever they wish.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with preferred and actual place of death for cancer patients in Johannesburg, South Africa.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, adult patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers were enrolled from 2016 to 2018. Study nurses interviewed the patients at enrollment and conducted postmortem interviews with the caregivers.

RESULTS

Of 324 patients enrolled, 191 died during follow-up. Preferred place of death was home for 127 (66.4%) and a facility for 64 (33.5%) patients; 91 (47.6%) patients died in their preferred setting, with a kappa value of congruence of 0.016 (95% CI = -0.107, 0.139). Factors associated with congruence were increasing age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05), use of morphine (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04-3.36), and wanting to die at home (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.82). Dying at home was associated with increasing age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and with the patient wishing to have family and/or friends present at death (OR 6.73, 95% CI 2.97-15.30).

CONCLUSION

Most patients preferred to die at home, but most died in hospital and fewer than half died in their preferred setting. Further research on modifiable factors, such as effective communication, access to palliative care and morphine, may ensure that more cancer patients in South Africa die wherever they wish.

[A retrospective study about the influence of an emergency information form on the place of death of palliative care patients]

In palliative medicine planning in advance is important for critical care situations. It is highly significant to make useful and by the patient and his relatives desired decisions. These concern transport in a situation of crisis and the venue of death (either death at home or transfer to a hospital).In this study the effect of a new Emergency Information Form about the place of death was examined. The used Emergency Information Form enabled the patient to express a wish on transfer in the case of crisis in advance and communicate this wish to the Emergency system.A total of 858 patients, taken care of by the mobile palliative-team Hartberg/Weiz/Vorau in the period from 2010 to 2015, were included in the study. The Intervention group-the patients for whom an Emergency Information Form was established-counted 38 patients. Data analysis was retrospective, pseudo anonymized and external.The 4 most important results were:1) The Emergency Information Form increased the probability for the intervention group to die at home (intervention group: 72.2%, controll group 1: 53.0%, controll group 2: 56.6%).2) Important in this change was, that the opinion of the patients was considered. The decision made in the Emergency Information Form correlated with a high significance (p = 0.01) with the actual place of death.3) Furthermore, it came clear that the Emergency Information Form was a useful tool to handle the utilization of special facilities. Within the intervention group young patients (with a lot of symptoms) died in a special facility more often than old patients. These, rather geriatric people, were mostly brought to a general hospital.4) There was no significant relation between the duration of care and the probability that an Emergency Information Form was established (p = 0.63). However, there was a high significance between the number of home visits and the probability that an Emergency Information Form was written (p = 0.02).Due to the fact that there was a small intervention group restricted to only one palliative team further studies could help to make clear advises for palliative teams regarding scope, duration and frequency of home-visits. Thus the term "care continuity" could be concretized in the guidelines.The study brought forward that numerous (and short) contacts with the patient were more convenient than less but long home-visits in order to fulfil the patients wish concerning his place of death.

Pilot randomized trial of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention for hospitalized patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with cancer experience a high symptom burden, which is associated with poor health outcomes and increased health care utilization. However, studies investigating symptom monitoring interventions in this population are lacking. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a symptom monitoring intervention to improve symptom management in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with advanced cancer who were admitted to the inpatient oncology service to a symptom monitoring intervention or usual care. Patients in both arms self-reported their symptoms daily (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Patients assigned to the intervention had their symptom reports presented graphically with alerts for moderate/severe symptoms during daily team rounds. The primary end point of the study was feasibility. We defined the intervention as feasible if >75% of participants hospitalized >2 days completed >2 symptom reports. We observed daily rounds to determine whether clinicians discussed and developed a plan to address patients' symptoms. We used regression models to assess intervention effects on patients' symptoms throughout their hospitalization, readmission risk, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Among 150 enrolled patients (81.1% enrollment), 94.2% completed >2 symptom reports. Clinicians discussed 60.4% of the symptom reports and developed a plan to address the symptoms highlighted by the symptom reports 20.8% of the time. Compared with usual care, intervention patients had a greater proportion of days with lower psychological distress (B = 0.12, P = 0.008), but no significant difference in the proportion of days with improved Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-physical symptoms (B = 0.07, P = 0.138). Intervention patients had lower readmission risk (hazard ratio = 0.68, P = 0.224), although this difference was not significant. We found no significant intervention effects on hospital LOS (B = 0.16, P = 0.862).

CONCLUSIONS

This symptom monitoring intervention is feasible and demonstrates encouraging preliminary efficacy for improving patients' symptoms and readmission risk.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02891993.

Determinants of Home Death in Patients With Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada

AIM

To determine factors associated with home death in patients with cancer in Ontario, particularly to assess the association between death at home and (1) patients' rural/urban residence and (2) neighborhood income in urban areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study in Ontario (2003-2010) using linked administrative databases. In order to account for clustering phenomenon, multivariable generalized estimating equation model was used to evaluate factors associated with home death. Analysis was performed in both rural and urban areas. For urban areas, neighborhood income was tested as a determinant of the place of death.

RESULTS

A total of 193 783 deaths were analyzed, 9.1% of which occurred at home. In urban areas, home death was more likely for patients living in richer neighborhoods (odds ratio 1.69 for the highest compared to lowest neighborhood income quintile, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-1.86). The odds of dying at home when living in a rural area were no different from those living in the poorest urban neighborhood. Other variables associated with lower odds of home death were comorbidity index, certain cancers, and year of death.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of dying at home significantly increases with living in higher-income urban neighborhoods and decreases with rural residence. Urban neighborhoods with lowest income have odds of home death similar to rural areas. These findings underline the importance of targeting proper populations for public support at the end of life.

Use of Antidepressant Medications Moderates the Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Advanced Cancer

BACKGROUND

Among patients with cancer, depressive symptoms are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including greater health care utilization. As use of antidepressant medications can improve depressive symptoms, we sought to examine relationships among depressive symptoms, antidepressant medications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with advanced cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2014 to May 2016, we prospectively enrolled patients with advanced cancer who had an unplanned hospitalization. We performed chart review to obtain information regarding documented depressive symptoms in the 3 months prior to admission and use of antidepressant medications at the time of admission. We compared differences in hospital LOS by presence or absence of depressive symptoms and used adjusted linear regression to examine if antidepressant medications moderated these outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1,036 patients, 126 (12.2%) had depressive symptoms documented prior to admission, and 288 (27.8%) were taking antidepressant medications at the time of admission. Patients with depressive symptoms experienced longer hospital LOS (7.25 vs. 6.13 days; p = .036). Use of antidepressant medications moderated this relationship; among patients not on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were associated with longer hospital LOS (7.88 vs. 6.11 days; p = .025), but among those on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were not associated with hospital LOS (6.57 vs. 6.17 days; p = .578).

CONCLUSION

Documented depressive symptoms prior to hospital admission were associated with longer hospital LOS. This effect was restricted to patients not on antidepressant medications. Future studies are needed to investigate if use of antidepressant medications decreases LOS for patients hospitalized with advanced cancer and the mechanisms by which this may occur.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study investigated the prevalence of documented depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer in the 3 months prior to an unplanned hospitalization and the prevalence of use of antidepressant medications at time of hospital admission. The relationship of these variables with hospital length of stay was also examined, and it was found that documented depressive symptoms were associated with prolonged hospital length of stay. Interestingly, antidepressant medications moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and hospital length of stay. These findings support the need to recognize and address depressive symptoms among patients with advanced cancer, with potential implications for optimizing health care utilization.

The Effect of Hospice on Hospital Admission and Readmission Rates: A Review

Symptom control may become challenging for terminally ill patients as they near the end of life. Patients often seek hospital admission to address symptoms, such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and restlessness. Alternatively, palliative medicine focuses on the control and mitigation of symptoms, while allowing patients to maintain their quality of life, whether in an outpatient or inpatient setting. Hospice care provides, in addition to inpatient care at a hospice facility or in a hospital, the option for patients to receive symptom management at home. This option for symptom control in the outpatient setting is essential to preventing repeated and expensive hospital readmissions. This article discusses the impact of hospice care on hospital readmission rates.

A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care

Objectives

Globally, healthcare systems are using the electronic health record (EHR) and elements of clinical decision support (CDS) to facilitate palliative care (PC). Examination of published results is needed to determine if the EHR is successfully supporting the multidisciplinary nature and complexity of PC by identifying applications, methodology, outcomes, and barriers of active incorporation of the EHR in PC clinical workflow.

Methods

A systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The data sources PubMed, CINAL, EBSCOhost, and Academic Search Premier were used to identify literature published 1999–2017 of human subject peer-reviewed articles in English containing original research about the EHR and PC.

Results

The search returned 433 articles, 30 of which met inclusion criteria. Most studies were feasibility studies or retrospective cohort analyses; one study incorporated prospective longitudinal mixed methods. Twenty-three of 30 (77%) were published after 2014. The review identified five major areas in which the EHR is used to support PC. Studies focused on CDS to: identify individuals who could benefit from PC; electronic advanced care planning (ACP) documentation; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as rapid, real-time pain feedback; to augment EHR PC data capture capabilities; and to enhance interdisciplinary communication and care.

Discussion

Beginning in 2015, there was a proliferation of articles about PC and EHRs, suggesting increasing incorporation of and research about the EHR with PC. This review indicates the EHR is underutilized for PC CDS, facilitating PROMs, and capturing ACPs.

The relationship between physical and psychological symptoms and health care utilization in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer often experience frequent and prolonged hospitalizations; however, the factors associated with greater health care utilization have not been described. We sought to investigate the relation between patients' physical and psychological symptom burden and health care utilization.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with advanced cancer and unplanned hospitalizations from September 2014-May 2016. Upon admission, we assessed physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) and psychological symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 4 [PHQ-4]). We examined the relationship between symptom burden and healthcare utilization using linear regression for hospital length of stay (LOS) and Cox regression for time to first unplanned readmission within 90 days. We adjusted all models for age, sex, marital status, comorbidity, education, time since advanced cancer diagnosis, and cancer type.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1,036 of 1,152 (89.9%) consecutive patients approached. Over one-half reported moderate/severe fatigue, poor well being, drowsiness, pain, and lack of appetite. PHQ-4 scores indicated that 28.8% and 28.0% of patients had depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The mean hospital LOS was 6.3 days, and the 90-day readmission rate was 43.1%. Physical symptoms (ESAS: unstandardized coefficient [B], 0.06; P < .001), psychological distress (PHQ-4 total: B, 0.11; P = .040), and depression symptoms (PHQ-4 depression: B, 0.22; P = .017) were associated with longer hospital LOS. Physical (ESAS: hazard ratio, 1.01; P < .001), and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-4 anxiety: hazard ratio, 1.06; P = .045) were associated with a higher likelihood for readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer experience a high symptom burden, which is significantly associated with prolonged hospitalizations and readmissions. Interventions are needed to address the symptom burden of this population to improve health care delivery and utilization. Cancer 2017;123:4720-4727. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

The Hospice Information System and its association with the congruence between the preferred and actual place of death

OBJECTIVE

A Hospice Information System (HIS) developed in eastern Taiwan in 2012 aimed to improve the quality of hospice care through an integrated system that provided telemetry-based vital sign records, online 24/7 consultations, online video interviews, and online health educations. The purpose of this study was to explore the congruence between the preferred and actual place of death (POD) among patients who received HIS services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed from January 2012 to August 2016. Data from patients enrolled in the HIS who died during this period were included. Data on basic characteristics and the actual and preferred POD were obtained from the HIS database. The primary outcome was the congruence between the preferred and actual POD. Secondary outcomes were comparisons between patients who did and did not achieve their preferred POD. Further comparisons between patients who did and did not achieve home death were also performed.

RESULTS

In total, we enrolled 481 patients who received HIS services and died. Of them, 444 (92.3%) died at their preferred POD. Patients who preferred an inpatient hospice as their POD had higher achievement rate than those who wanted a home death. High-intensity HIS utilization was associated with a higher likelihood of home death than low-intensity HIS utilization. Patients living in areas distant from the medical center had lower achievement of home death than those living in local areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that patients enrolled in the HIS had high congruence between the actual and preferred POD.

Palliative and end-of-life care in glioblastoma: defining and measuring opportunities to improve care

BACKGROUND

American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) quality measures for terminal cancers recommend early advance care planning and hospice at the end of life. We sought to evaluate adherence to 5 palliative care quality measures and explore associations with patient outcomes in glioblastoma.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 117 deceased glioblastoma patients over 5 years. Records were reviewed to describe adherence to palliative care quality measures and patient outcomes. Data regarding emotional assessments, advance directives, palliative care consultation, chemotherapy administration, hospice, location of death, and overall survival were collected.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 12.9 months. By the second oncology visit, 22.2% (26/117) had an emotional assessment completed. Advance directives were documented for 52.1% (61/117) by the third neuro-oncology visit (30/61 health care proxy), yet 26.5% (31/117) did not have any advance directive before the last month of life. With regard to other ASCO quality measures, 36.8% (43/117) had a palliative care consult; 94.0% (110/117) did not receive chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life; 59.8% (70/117) enrolled in hospice >7 days before death; and 56.4% (66/117) died in a home setting. Patients who enrolled in hospice >7 days before death were 3.56 times more likely to die in a home setting than patients enrolled <7 days before death or with no hospice enrollment (P = .002, [OR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.57-8.04]).

CONCLUSIONS

Late advance directive documentation, minimal early palliative care involvement, and the association of early hospice enrollment with death in a home setting underscore the need to improve care and better define palliative care quality measures in glioblastoma.

End-of-life care for head and neck cancer patients: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) usually present a poor prognosis and cause high morbidity rates. Recent surveys have demonstrated that HNC incidence rates are still on the increase in many countries. Our study objective was to assess the end-of-life care for patients with HNCs in Taiwan.

METHODS

Data was retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, where we identified patients who had been diagnosed with HNCs from January 1997 to December 2010. Each patient's annual trend of opioid use and hospice care needs, along with the distribution of place of death in the study cohort, were all analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 98,211 HNC patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2010 were eligible for this study. The majority of HNC patients died in hospital. Patients who were male, lived in capital area, had a higher income, had received palliative hospice care, and had been prescribed opioids tended to choose to die at home or in hospice wards. Both opioid prescription and hospice care have increased during the past 10 years; however, the rate of palliative hospice care remained below 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that greater efforts are needed to implement palliative care for HNC patients in Taiwan.

Place of Death of Individuals with Terminal Cancer: New Insights from Medicare Hospice Place-of-Service Codes

OBJECTIVES

To use place-of-service (POS) codes in the Medicare hospice claims files to document where elderly hospice users with cancer die.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry areas.

PARTICIPANTS

Elderly Medicare beneficiaries who died of lung, breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer in 2007 and 2008 (N = 46,037).

MEASUREMENT

Use of hospice, place of service at death (home, nursing home, hospital, inpatient hospice, other), length of stay in hospice.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the beneficiaries used hospice. Younger, male, black, Asian, and unmarried beneficiaries and those enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare or from areas with lower income were less likely to use hospice. Hospice enrollment also varied significantly according to SEER registry. Thirty percent of the hospice users were not receiving home-based care at the time of death, and 17% were enrolled for less than 3 days. Factors associated with hospice death in the home mirrored those associated with hospice use. Individuals dying in hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 5.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.63-5.69), inpatient hospice (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.70-2.02), and nursing homes (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.10-1.28) had greater odds of a short hospice stay (≤7 days) than those dying at home, after controlling for all other measured factors, whereas those dying in nursing homes had greater odds of long stays (>180 days) (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28-1.67).

CONCLUSION

New hospice POS codes are useful for understanding place of death for hospice users. Hospice deaths cannot be assumed to happen at home.

Locating care at the end of life: burden, vulnerability, and the practical accomplishment of dying

Home is frequently idealised as the preferred location for end-of-life care, while in-patient hospital care is viewed with suspicion and fear. Yet many people with a terminal illness spend their final days in some form of medicalised institutional setting, such as a specialist palliative care in-patient unit. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with in-patients at a specialist palliative care unit, we focus on their difficulties in finding a better place of care at the end of their life. We found that participants came to conceptualise home though a sense of bodily vulnerabilities and that they frequently understood institutional care to be more about protecting their family from the social, emotional and relational burdens of dying. For a significant number of participants the experience of dying came to be understood through what could be practically accomplished in different locales. The different locales were therefore framed around providing the best care for the patient and their family.

Does Continuous Hospice Care Help Patients Remain at Home?

CONTEXT

In the U. S., hospices sometimes provide high-intensity "continuous care" in patients' homes. However, little is known about the way that continuous care is used or what impact continuous care has on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To describe patients who receive continuous care and determine whether continuous care reduces the likelihood that patients will die in an inpatient unit or hospital.

METHODS

Data from 147,137 patients admitted to 11 U.S. hospices between 2008 and 2012 were extracted from the electronic medical records. The hospices are part of a research-focused collaboration. The study used a propensity score-matched cohort design.

RESULTS

A total of 99,687 (67.8%) patients were in a private home or nursing home on the day before death, and of these, 10,140 (10.2%) received continuous care on the day before death. A propensity score-matched sample (n = 24,658) included 8524 patients who received continuous care and 16,134 patients who received routine care on the day before death. Using the two matched groups, patients who received continuous care on the day before death were significantly less likely to die in an inpatient hospice setting (350/8524 vs. 2030/16,134; 4.1% vs. 12.6%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% CI 0.27-0.34; P < 0.001). When patients were cared for by a spouse, the use of continuous care was associated with a larger decrease in inpatient deaths (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.09-0.16; P < 0.001) compared with those patients cared for by other family members (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.32-0.42; P < 0.001). It is possible that unmeasured covariates were not included in the propensity score match.

CONCLUSION

Use of continuous care on the day before death is associated with a significant reduction in the use of inpatient care on the last day of life, particularly when patients are cared for by a spouse.

Predictors of Place of Death for Those in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Services in Ontario, Canada

Many cancer patients die in institutional settings despite their preference to die at home. A longitudinal, prospective cohort study was conducted to comprehensively assess the determinants of home death for patients receiving home-based palliative care. Data collected from biweekly telephone interviews with caregivers (n = 302) and program databases were entered into a multivariate logistic model. Patients with high nursing costs (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3; confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-10.2) and patients with high personal support worker costs (OR: 2.3; CI: 1.1-4.5) were more likely to die at home than those with low costs. Patients who lived alone were less likely to die at home than those who cohabitated (OR: 0.4; CI: 0.2-0.8), and those with a high propensity for a home-death preference were more likely to die at home than those with a low propensity (OR: 5.8; CI: 1.1-31.3). An understanding of the predictors of place of death may contribute to the development of effective interventions that support home death.

Same agency, different teams: perspectives from home and inpatient hospice care

Tremendous growth in hospice over the past 30 years in the United States has increased the number of terminally ill patients dying at home. Recently, however, more hospice patients are dying at inpatient facilities. To understand the varying perceptions about care in the home and inpatient hospice, we conducted semistructured interviews with 24 interdisciplinary team (IDT) members and analyzed the data using the constant comparative method. Core interdisciplinary tasks, including identifying the focus of energy, tailoring family caregiver involvement, acknowledging who is in charge, and knowing both sides differed in the home and inpatient settings. Despite the overarching umbrella of hospice care, home and inpatient hospice settings create different foci for IDT members, burdens and privileges for family caregivers, and control of the care plan. Key differences between home and inpatient hospice processes of care highlight the complexity of patient-centered end-of-life care in the United States.

Patient Preferences versus Family Physicians' Perceptions Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: A Nationwide Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Enabling people to die in their preferred place is important for providing high-quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to explore patients' preferences regarding the place of end-of-life care and death and to compare these preferences with the perceptions of their family physicians.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used stratified random sampling, surveying 400 registered patients and 200 of their family physicians nationwide, with a five-part, structured, self-report questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the selected population, 310 patients (response rate 77.5%) and 169 physicians (response rate 84.5%) responded. Regarding the preferred place for end-of-life care, most of the patients would choose to receive care at home (60.6%) if home care services were available. Additionally, home was the most frequently preferred (66.5%) place of death. The family physicians' survey showed that a higher proportion of physicians selected home as the preferred place for end-of-life care and death (71.6% and 87.2%, respectively). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that patients younger than 50 years of age who believed in Chinese folk religion and who resided in a rural area were more likely to prefer to die at home.

CONCLUSIONS

The most commonly preferred place for end-of-life care and death is the patient's home. Establishing a community-based palliative care system should be encouraged to allow more individuals to die in their preferred locations. There were discrepancies in the preferred place of end-of-life care and death between the patients' preferences and their family physicians' perceptions. More effective physician-patient communication regarding end-of-life care is needed.

Hospice Enrollment, Local Hospice Utilization Patterns, and Rehospitalization in Medicare Patients

BACKGROUND

Rehospitalizations are prevalent and associated with decreased quality of life. Although hospice has been advocated to reduce rehospitalizations, it is not known how area-level hospice utilization patterns affect rehospitalization risk.

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to examine the association between hospice enrollment, local hospice utilization patterns, and 30-day rehospitalization in Medicare patients.

METHODS

With a retrospective cohort design, 1,997,506 hospitalizations were assessed between 2005 and 2009 from a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Local hospice utilization was defined using tertiles representing the percentage of all deaths occurring in hospice within each Hospital Service Area (HSA). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between 30-day rehospitalization, hospice enrollment, and local hospice utilization, adjusting for patient sociodemographics, medical history, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Rates of patients dying in hospice were 27% in the lowest hospice utilization tertile, 41% in the middle tertile, and 53% in the highest tertile. Patients enrolled in hospice had lower rates of 30-day rehospitalization than those not enrolled (2.2% versus 18.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.118-0.131). Patients residing in areas of low hospice utilization were at greater rehospitalization risk than those residing in areas of high utilization (19.1% versus 17.5%; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), which persisted beyond that accounted for by individual hospice enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Area-level hospice utilization is inversely proportional to rehospitalization rates. This relationship is not fully explained by direct hospice enrollment, and may reflect a spillover effect of the benefits of hospice extending to nonenrollees.

Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?

BACKGROUND

Growth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Seven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network.

PATIENTS

70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012.

MEASUREMENTS

We measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences.

RESULTS

More patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7%), 2537 (18.5%); OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5% in 2012 vs 7.9% in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74% in 2008 to 78% in 2012 (p<0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.

The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning is the process of discussing and recording patient preferences concerning goals of care for patients who may lose capacity or communication ability in the future. Advance care planning could potentially improve end-of-life care, but the methods/tools used are varied and of uncertain benefit. Outcome measures used in existing studies are highly variable.

AIM

To present an overview of studies on the effects of advance care planning and gain insight in the effectiveness of different types of advance care planning.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for experimental and observational studies on the effects of advance care planning published in 2000-2012.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3571 papers, of which 113 were relevant for this review. For each study, the level of evidence was graded. Most studies were observational (95%), originated from the United States (81%) and were performed in hospitals (49%) or nursing homes (32%). Do-not-resuscitate orders (39%) and written advance directives (34%) were most often studied. Advance care planning was often found to decrease life-sustaining treatment, increase use of hospice and palliative care and prevent hospitalisation. Complex advance care planning interventions seem to increase compliance with patients' end-of-life wishes.

CONCLUSION

The effects of different types of advance care planning have been studied in various settings and populations using different outcome measures. There is evidence that advance care planning positively impacts the quality of end-of-life care. Complex advance care planning interventions may be more effective in meeting patients' preferences than written documents alone. More studies are needed with an experimental design, in different settings, including the community.

Stress among Care Givers: The Impact of Nursing a Relative with Cancer

AIMS

The aim of the present study is to assess the level and areas of stress among care givers nursing their loved ones suffering from cancer.

SETTING AND DESIGN

An assessment of care givers' stress providing care to cancer patients at Cipla Palliative Care Center was conducted. The study involves data collection using a questionnaire and subsequent analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A close-ended questionnaire that had seven sections on different aspects of caregivers' stress was developed and administered to 137 participants and purpose of conducting the survey was explained to their understanding. Caregivers who were willing to participate were asked to read and/or explained the questions and requested to reply as per the scales given. Data was collected in the questionnaires and was quantitatively analyzed.

RESULTS

The study results showed that overall stress level among caregivers is 5.18 ± 0.26 (on a scale of 0-10); of the total, nearly 62% of caregivers were ready to ask for professional help from nurses, medical social workers and counselors to cope up with their stress.

CONCLUSION

Stress among caregivers ultimately affects quality of care that is being provided to the patient. This is also because they are unprepared to provide care, have inadequate knowledge about care giving along with financial burden, physical and emotional stress. Thus interventions are needed to help caregivers to strengthen their confidence in giving care and come out with better quality of care.

Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients' end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the receipt of chemotherapy among terminally ill cancer patients months before death was associated with patients' subsequent intensive medical care and place of death.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a prospective, multi-institution, longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer.

SETTING

Eight outpatient oncology clinics in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

386 adult patients with metastatic cancers refractory to at least one chemotherapy regimen, whom physicians identified as terminally ill at study enrollment and who subsequently died.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

intensive medical care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or both) in the last week of life and patients' place of death (for example, intensive care unit).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

survival, late hospice referrals (≤ 1 week before death), and dying in preferred place of death.

RESULTS

216 (56%) of 386 terminally ill cancer patients were receiving palliative chemotherapy at study enrollment, a median of 4.0 months before death. After propensity score weighted adjustment, use of chemotherapy at enrollment was associated with higher rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or both in the last week of life (14% v 2%; adjusted risk difference 10.5%, 95% confidence interval 5.0% to 15.5%) and late hospice referrals (54% v 37%; 13.6%, 3.6% to 23.6%) but no difference in survival (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.38). Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy were more likely to die in an intensive care unit (11% v 2%; adjusted risk difference 6.1%, 1.1% to 11.1%) and less likely to die at home (47% v 66%; -10.8%, -1.0% to -20.6%), compared with those who were not. Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy were also less likely to die in their preferred place, compared with those who were not (65% v 80%; adjusted risk difference -9.4%, -0.8% to -18.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of chemotherapy in terminally ill cancer patients in the last months of life was associated with an increased risk of undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation or both and of dying in an intensive care unit. Future research should determine the mechanisms by which palliative chemotherapy affects end of life outcomes and patients' attainment of their goals.

Not quite seamless: transitions between home and inpatient hospice

BACKGROUND

Although most hospice care occurs in the home, a growing number of patients utilize inpatient hospice settings. An inpatient hospice stay requires one or more transitions in care settings, although little is known about these transitions.

OBJECTIVE/DESIGN

Using ethnographic methods, this study examined the beliefs and practices of older adults, their caregivers, and hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT) members surrounding transitions between home and inpatient hospice.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

Data collection took place over 11 months in a large not-for-profit hospice agency in the northeast. Data were collected through 18 observations and 38 semistructured interviews with patients, family caregivers, and hospice IDT members.

RESULTS

Transitions from home to inpatient hospice centered on three processes: developing a plan for future needs, identifying triggers that signaled increased needs for care, and navigating through phases of increased care. Patients, family caregivers, or IDT members identified triggers for more care, and actions were taken to respond in the home care setting. Challenges to these actions occurred in many phases of care and when needs were ultimately unable to be addressed at home, patients were transferred to inpatient hospice.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding how care planning, increased needs, and phases of care influence decisions about transitioning patients to inpatient hospice can guide IDT members in minimizing transitions and providing a more seamless continuum of hospice care.

Settings of Care within Hospice: New Options and Questions about Dying "At Home"

Although place of death has been routinely studied in end-of-life (EOL) care, more analysis on place of death within hospice is needed because of the recent, dramatic rise in the number of hospice patients dying in inpatient settings. Using a case study to illustrate the complexity of determinants of place of death within hospice, this article highlights important known factors and elucidate gaps for further research. Individual and system level factors, sociocultural meanings, caregiving and preferences are shown to have important implications. Additionally, the unique components of home hospice, inpatient hospice and transitions between these settings may have a fundamental role in the future of quality EOL care. Further research on determinants of hospice settings of care is essential to the care of older adults at the end of life.

Medical manuscripts impact of hospice enrollment on cost and length of stay of a terminal admission

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether hospice enrollment at the time of a terminal admission alters the length of stay (LOS) or costs compared with patients not enrolled in hospice.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all nontraumatic inpatient deaths of patients with a previous admission in the preceding 12 months at an academic hospital.

RESULTS

209 patients had a nontraumatic death and an admission in the year prior to the terminal admission. Patients enrolled in hospice had a shorter LOS (P = .02) and lower cost (P < .0001) than patients not enrolled at the time of their terminal admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Enrollment in hospice during a terminal admission decreased cost and LOS. Hospice may be a way to provide more cost-effective, appropriate care to dying patients.