Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2024 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a clonal, nonproliferative plasma cell disorder in which fragments of immunoglobulin light or heavy chain are deposited in tissues. Clinical features depend on organs involved but can include heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, nephrotic syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, peripheral/autonomic neuropathy, and "atypical smoldering multiple myeloma or MGUS."

DIAGNOSIS

Tissue biopsy stained with Congo red demonstrating amyloid deposits with apple-green birefringence is required for the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Organ biopsy is not required in 85% of patients. Verification that amyloid is composed of immunoglobulin light chains is mandatory. The gold standard is laser capture mass spectroscopy.

PROGNOSIS

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP or BNP), serum troponin T(or I), and difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain values are used to classify patients into four stages; 5-year survivals are 82%, 62%, 34%, and 20%, respectively.

THERAPY

All patients with a systemic amyloid syndrome require therapy to prevent deposition of amyloid in other organs and prevent progressive organ failure. Current first-line therapy with the best outcome is daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. The goal of therapy is a ≥VGPR. In patients failing to achieve this depth of response options for consolidation include pomalidomide, stem cell transplantation, venetoclax, and bendamustine.

FUTURE CHALLENGES

Delayed diagnosis remains a major obstacle to initiating effective therapy prior to the development of end-stage organ failure. Trials of antibodies to deplete deposited fibrils are underway.

The Role of t(11;14) in Tailoring Treatment Decisions in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents a hematological neoplasia with an uncontrolled proliferation of malignant plasma cells and complex cytogenetic abnormalities. t(11;14) has emerged as a crucial genetic aberration and is one of the most common primary translocations in MM. Patients harboring t(11;14) represent a distinctive subgroup with a clinical profile that differs from t(11;14)-negative MM risk categories. One of the key features linked with t(11;14) is the BCL2 dependency, indicating vulnerability to BCL2 inhibition. BCL2 inhibitors, such as venetoclax, demonstrated impressive efficacy alone or in combination with other anti-myeloma drugs in patients with RRMM accompanied by t(11;14) and BCL2 overexpression. Therefore, t(11;14) plays a key role in both risk stratification and informed decision making towards a tailored therapy. In this review, we highlight the biology of t(11;14) in MM cells, summarize the current evolving role of t(11;14) in the era of novel agents and novel targeted therapies, illuminate current efficacy and safety data of BCL2-based treatment options and explore the future prospects of individualized precision medicine for this special subgroup of patients with MM.

Impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on treatment outcomes in patients with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: subanalyses from the ANDROMEDA study

BACKGROUND

Cytogenetic abnormalities are common in patients with amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis; some are associated with poorer outcomes. This post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA evaluated the impact of certain cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes in this patient population.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis were randomised 1:1 to daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) or VCd. Outcomes were evaluated in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with t(11;14), amp1q21, del13q14, and del17p13.

RESULTS

Overall, 321 patients had cytogenetic testing (D-VCd, n = 155; VCd, n = 166); most common abnormalities were t(11;14) and amp1q21. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months, haematologic complete response rates were higher with D-VCd vs VCd across all cytogenetic subgroups and organ response rates were numerically higher with D-VCd vs VCd across most subgroups. Point estimates for hazard ratio of major organ deterioration-PFS and -EFS favoured D-VCd over VCd for all cytogenetic subgroups. Deep haematologic responses (involved minus uninvolved free light chains [FLC] <10 mg/L or involved FLC ≤20 mg/L) were seen in more patients with D-VCd than VCd in all ITT and t(11;14) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the use of D-VCd as standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Cyclin D1-Positive AL Amyloidosis

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the clinical features and prognostic impact of cyclin D1 positivity in patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis (AL).

METHODS

We consecutively included 71 patients diagnosed with AL with cyclin D1 positivity between February 2008 and January 2022. t(11;14) was examined through interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization using bone marrow cells.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 73 years, and 53.5% were male. The underlying diseases included symptomatic multiple myeloma, smoldering multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, representing 33.8%, 26.8%, 2.8%, and 36.6%, respectively. The prevalence of cyclin D1 and t(11;14) was 38.0% and 34.7%, respectively. Higher frequency of light chain paraprotein type was seen in cyclin D1-positive patients with AL than in cyclin D1-negative patients (70.4% vs 18.2%). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with AL with and without cyclin D1 expression was 18.9 months and 73.1 months, respectively (P = .019). Early death occurred in 44.4% of cyclin D1-positive patients and 31.8% of cyclin D1-negative patients. Moreover, 83.3% of cyclin D1-positive patients and 21.4% of cyclin D1-negative patients died of cardiac causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin D1 immunohistochemistry accurately identified patients with t(11;14). Cyclin D1-positive patients had significantly inferior OS compared with cyclin D1-negative patients.

Cardiovascular toxicity from therapies for light chain amyloidosis

Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a hematological disorder characterized by abnormal proliferation of a plasma cell clone producing monoclonal free light chains that misfold and aggregate into insoluble fibrils in various tissues. Cardiac involvement is a common feature leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy and poor prognosis. Current first-line treatments aim at achieving hematological response by targeting the plasma cell clones, and these have been adapted from multiple myeloma therapy. Patients with AL amyloidosis often exhibit multiorgan involvement, making them susceptible to cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Managing AL amyloidosis is a complex issue that requires enhanced knowledge of the cardio-oncological implications of hematological treatments. Future research should focus on implementing and validating primary and secondary prevention strategies and understanding the biochemical basis of oncological therapy-related damage to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity.

Advancements and future trends of immunotherapy in light-chain amyloidosis

Light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a type of plasma cell neoplasm with abnormal monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain production and their subsequent deposition in tissues causing end-organ damage. In addition to existing treatments including autologous stem cell transplantation, there is a need for other approaches for eradicating abnormal plasma cells and amyloid tissue deposits. Treatment strategies of AL amyloidosis are mostly based on medications that are effective in multiple myeloma due to similar cell of origin. Daratumumab along with proteasome inhibitors and corticosteroids has become standard of care for AL amyloidosis. Another appealing approach is disassembling amyloid deposits with hope to potentially reverse the damage done by the disease. This was met with promising results for CAEL-101 and birtamimab. Although still in early stages, novel treatment options in pipeline, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy may diversify the treatment armamentarium of AL amyloidosis in the future.

Guidelines for non-transplant chemotherapy for treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group

BACKGROUND

This guideline has been developed jointly by the European Society of Haematology and International Society of Amyloidosis recommending non-transplant chemotherapy treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis.

METHODS

A review of literature and grading of evidence as well as expert recommendations by the ESH and ISA guideline committees.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations of this committee suggest that treatment follows the clinical presentation which determines treatment tolerance tempered by potential side effects to select and modify use of drugs in AL amyloidosis. All patients with AL amyloidosis should be considered for clinical trials where available. Daratumumab-VCD is recommended from most untreated patients (VCD or VMDex if daratumumab is unavailable). At relapse, the two guiding principles are the depth and duration of initial response, use of a class of agents not previously exposed as well as the limitation imposed by patients' fitness/frailty and end organ damage. Targeted agents like venetoclax need urgent prospective evaluation. Future prospective trials should include advanced stage patients to allow for evidence-based treatment decisions. Therapies targeting amyloid fibrils or those reducing the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic light chains/oligomers are urgently needed.

The Landscape of Cytogenetic Aberrations in Light-Chain Amyloidosis with or without Coexistent Multiple Myeloma

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) has been well established in the preliminary prognostic evaluation of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the chromosomal aberrations in patients with systemic light-chain amyloidosis, notably in patients with coexistent MM, have been rarely investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of iFISH aberrations on the prognosis of systemic light-chain amyloidosis (AL) with and without concurrent MM. The iFISH results and clinical characteristics of 142 patients with systemic light-chain amyloidosis were analyzed, and survival analysis was conducted. Among the 142 patients, 80 patients had AL amyloidosis alone, and the other 62 patients had concurrent MM. The incidence rate of 13q deletion, t(4;14), was higher in AL amyloidosis patients with concurrent MM than that of primary AL amyloidosis patients (27.4% vs. 12.5%, and 12.9% vs. 5.0%, respectively), and the incidence rate of t(11;14) in primary AL amyloidosis patients was higher than that in AL amyloidosis patients with concurrent MM (15.0% vs. 9.7%). Moreover, the two groups had the similar incidence rates of 1q21 gain (53.8% and 56.5%, respectively). The result of the survival analysis suggested that patients with t(11;14) and 1q21 gain had a shorter median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), irrespective of the presence or absence of MM, and patients with AL amyloidosis and concurrent MM carrying t(11;14) had the poorest prognosis, with a median OS time of 8.1 months.

Diagnosis and Treatment of AL Amyloidosis

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by an usually small B cell clone that produces a toxic light chain forming amyloid deposits in tissue. The heart and kidney are the major organs affected, but all others, with the exception of the CNS, can be involved. The disease is rapidly progressive, and it is still diagnosed late. Screening programs in patients followed by hematologists for plasma cell dyscrasias should be considered. The diagnosis requires demonstration in a tissue biopsy of amyloid deposits formed by immunoglobulin light chains. The workup of patients with AL amyloidosis requires adequate technology and expertise, and patients should be referred to specialized centers whenever possible. Stagings are based on cardiac and renal biomarkers and guides the choice of treatment. The combination of daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (dara-CyBorD) is the current standard of care. Autologous stem cell transplant is performed in eligible patients, especially those who do not attain a satisfactory response to dara-CyBorD. Passive immunotherapy targeting the amyloid deposits combined with chemo-/immune-therapy targeting the amyloid clone is currently being tested in controlled clinical trials. Response to therapy is assessed based on validated criteria. Profound hematologic response is the early goal of treatment and should be accompanied over time by deepening organ response. Many relapsed/refractory patients are also treated with daratumumab combination, but novel regimens will be needed to rescue daratumumab-exposed subjects. Immunomodulatory drugs are the current cornerstone of rescue therapy, while immunotherapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen and inhibitors of Bcl-2 are promising alternatives.

Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Diagnosis and Risk Assessment

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder with multiple clinical presentations. The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis requires a high index of suspicion, making a delay in diagnosis common, which contributes to the high early mortality seen in this disease. Establishing the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis requires the demonstration of tissue deposition of amyloid fibrils. A bone marrow biopsy and fat pad aspirate performed concurrently have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis and negate the need for organ biopsies in most patients. An accurate diagnosis requires amyloid typing via additional testing, including tissue mass spectrometry. Prognostication for AL amyloidosis is largely driven by the organs impacted. Cardiac involvement represents the single most important prognostic marker, and the existing staging systems are driven by cardiac biomarkers. Apart from organ involvement, plasma cell percentage on the bone marrow biopsy, specific fluorescence in situ hybridization findings, age at diagnosis, and performance status are important prognostic markers. This review elaborates on the diagnostic testing and prognostication for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Bad players in AL amyloidosis in the current era of treatment

INTRODUCTION

Systemic AL amyloidosis (ALA) is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disease characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils in different organs and tissues. Traditionally, the prognosis of ALA is poor and is primarily defined by cardiac involvement. The modern prognostic models are based on cardiac markers and free light chain difference (dFLC). Cardiac biomarkers have low specificity and are dependent on renal function, volume status, and cardiac diseases other than ALA. New therapies significantly improved the prognosis of the disease. The advancements in technologies - cardiac echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac MRI (CMR), as well as new biological markers, relying on cardiac injury, inflammation, endothelial damage, and clonal and non-clonal PC markers are promising.

AREAS COVERED

An update on the prognostic significance of cardiac ALA, number of involved organs, response to treatment, including minimal residual disease (MRD), ECHO, MRI, and new biological markers will be discussed. The literature search was done in PubMed and Google Scholar, and the most recent and relevant data are included.

EXPERT OPINION

Prospective multicenter trials, evaluating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, should be done to improve the risk assessment models in ALA in the modern era of therapy.

Individualized Approach to Management of Light Chain Amyloidosis

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by a B-cell (most commonly plasma cell) clone that produces a toxic light chain that forms amyloid fibrils in tissues and causes severe, progressive organ dysfunction. The clinical presentation is protean, and patients are usually extremely frail, thus requiring careful adaptation of the treatment approach. However, the severity of organ involvement can be accurately assessed with biomarkers that allow a sharp prognostic stratification and precise tailoring of the treatment strategy. Moreover, the availability of biomarker-based response criteria also allows adjustment of the treatment approach over time. The recent completion of 3 large randomized clinical trials has offered new evidence for designing appropriate treatments. All this information has recently been integrated in the joint guidelines of the International Society of Amyloidosis and the European Hematology Association for the treatment of AL amyloidosis. Other clinical trials are underway testing new agents directed against the amyloid clone and the amyloid deposits. Our understanding of the peculiarities of the amyloid clone, as well as our ability to detect residual clonal disease and improve organ dysfunction, are also being refined and will result in more precise personalization of the treatment approach.

[Nephropathy associated with monoclonal immunoglobulins: From clonal expansion B to renal toxicity of pathological immunoglobulins]

Germinal center regulation pathways are often involved in lymphomagenesis and myelomagenesis. Most of the lymphomas (and multiple myeloma) derive from post-germinal center B-cells that have undergone somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Hence, B-cell clonal expansion can be responsible for the presence of a monoclonal component (immunoglobulin) of variable titer which, owing to physicochemical properties, can provoke pathologically defined entities of diseases. These diseases can affect any functional part of the kidney, by multiple mechanisms, either well known or not. The presence of renal deposition is influenced by germinal gene involved, immunoglobulin primary structure, post-translational modifications and microenvironmental interactions. The two ways immunoglobulin can cause kidney toxicity are (i) an excess of production (overcoming catabolism power by proximal tubule epithelial cells) with an excess of free light chains within the distal tubules and a subsequent risk of precipitation due to local physicochemical properties; (ii) by structural characteristics that predispose immunoglobulin to a renal disease (whatever their titer). The purpose of this manuscript is to review literature concerning the pathophysiology of renal toxicities of clonal immunoglobulin, from molecular B-cell expansion mechanisms to immunoglobulin renal toxicity.

IgM-Related Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic disorder characterized by an IgM paraprotein. The clinical presentation of WM varies and can include common manifestations such as anemia and hyperviscosity, in addition to less common features such as cryoglobulinemia, IgM-related neuropathy, and immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Amyloidosis is a protein-folding disorder in which vital organ damage occurs due to the accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates. The most common type of amyloidosis in patients with an IgM paraprotein is AL amyloidosis, although other types of amyloidosis may occur. IgM-related amyloidosis has distinct clinical features when compared with other subtypes of AL amyloidosis. This review highlights the diagnostic criteria of IgM-related AL amyloidosis, as well as the clinical characteristics and treatment options for this disorder.

Advances in the treatment of light chain amyloidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After many years, the management of systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is entering the era of evidence-based medicine, with three recently published randomized clinical trials, a regimen (daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, daratumumab-CyBorD) labeled for upfront therapy, more clinical trials ongoing, and published guidelines. In this review, we discuss how current practice is changing based on this data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Daratumumab-CyBorD grants unprecedentedly high rates of hematologic and organ response and became the novel standard-of-care in AL amyloidosis. The International Society of Amyloidosis and the European Hematology Association issued common guidelines for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in this disease. Improved patient selection and effective induction regimens greatly reduced ASCT-related mortality. Venetoclax is emerging as a very effective option in patients harboring the common t(11;14) abnormality. Rapid and profound reduction of the amyloid free light chain can improve survival also at advanced stages.

SUMMARY

Daratumumab-CyBorD is being integrated into the treatment flow-chart whereas the role of ASCT is being redefined. New approaches are being tested in clinical trials. Treatment of daratumumab-refractory patients and validation of criteria of hematologic progression to be used in clinical trials and in individual patient management are current areas of research.

Exploiting endogenous and therapy-induced apoptotic vulnerabilities in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with BH3 mimetics

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is an incurable hematologic disorder typically characterized by the production of amyloidogenic light chains by clonal plasma cells. These light chains misfold and aggregate in healthy tissues as amyloid fibrils, leading to life-threatening multi-organ dysfunction. Here we show that the clonal plasma cells in AL amyloidosis are highly primed to undergo apoptosis and dependent on pro-survival proteins MCL-1 and BCL-2. Notably, this MCL-1 dependency is indirectly targeted by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, currently the standard of care for this disease and the related plasma cell disorder multiple myeloma, due to upregulation of pro-apoptotic Noxa and its inhibitory binding to MCL-1. BCL-2 inhibitors sensitize clonal plasma cells to multiple front-line therapies including bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide. Strikingly, in mice bearing AL amyloidosis cell line xenografts, single agent treatment with the BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-199 (venetoclax) produces deeper remissions than bortezomib and triples median survival. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis reveals rewiring of signaling pathways regulating apoptosis, proliferation and mitochondrial metabolism between isogenic AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma cells that divergently alter their sensitivity to therapies. These findings provide a roadmap for the use of BH3 mimetics to exploit endogenous and induced apoptotic vulnerabilities in AL amyloidosis.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2022 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a clonal, nonproliferative plasma cell disorder in which fragments of immunoglobulin light or heavy chain are deposited in tissues. Clinical features depend on organs involved but can include heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, nephrotic syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, peripheral/autonomic neuropathy, and "atypical smoldering multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)."

DIAGNOSIS

Tissue biopsy stained with Congo red demonstrating amyloid deposits with apple-green birefringence is required for the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Invasive organ biopsy is not required in 85% of patients. Verification that amyloid is composed of immunoglobulin light chains is mandatory. The gold standard is laser capture mass spectroscopy.

PROGNOSIS

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP or BNP), serum troponin T (or I), and difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain values are used to classify patients into four groups of similar size; median survivals are 73, 35, 15, and 5 months.

THERAPY

All patients with a systemic amyloid syndrome require therapy to prevent deposition of amyloid in other organs and prevent progressive organ failure. Current first-line therapy with the best outcome is daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. The goal of therapy is a complete response (CR). In patients failing to achieve this depth of response options for consolidation include pomalidomide, stem cell transplantation, venetoclax, and bendamustine.

FUTURE CHALLENGES

Delayed diagnosis remains a major obstacle to initiating effective therapy prior to the development of end-stage organ failure. Trials of antibodies to catabolize deposited fibrils are underway.

Immunotherapy in AL Amyloidosis

OPINION STATEMENT

Light-chain amyloidosis is a rare disorder where a small clone of plasma cells is producing excess toxic light chains that deposit in various organs and cause dysfunction. Cardiac involvement is a major determinant of survival and rapid reduction of light chain is critical for recovery of organ function and overall survival. Immunotherapy targeting the clonal plasma cells and amyloid fibrils has emerged as a promising candidate. Daratumumab, both alone and in combinations with other anti-myeloma agents, is able to achieve deep hematologic responses and has greatly improved outcomes. Isatuximab, elotuzumab, and CAEL101 have also shown promising results and further studies are ongoing in the frontline as well as the relapsed/refractory setting. The frailty of AL patients and the relapsing/remitting nature of the disease present unique challenges, and the low toxicity of monoclonal antibodies makes them well-suited for these patients. Other immunotherapy agents including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates have altered the landscape in treatment of multiple myeloma, and are in the early phase of evaluation in patients with AL amyloidosis with results eagerly awaited.

Light Chain Amyloidosis: Epidemiology, Staging, and Prognostication

Amyloidosis is a disorder of protein misfolding and metabolism in which insoluble fibrils are deposited in various tissues, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death. Out of the 60-plus heterogeneous amyloidogenic proteins that have been identified, approximately 30 are associated with human disease. The unifying feature of these proteins is their tendency to form beta-pleated sheets aligned in an antiparallel fashion. These sheets then form rigid, nonbranching fibrils that resist proteolysis, causing mechanical disruption and local oxidative stress in affected organs such as the heart, liver, kidneys, nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract. Here we review the epidemiology of light chain amyloidosis, the staging, and the concomitant prognostication that is critical in determining the appropriate treatment.

Systematic literature review of evidence in amyloid light-chain amyloidosis

Introduction: Treatment of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, a rare disease with a <5-year lifespan, remains challenging. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to evaluate the current evidence base in AL amyloidosis. Methods: Literature searches on clinical, health-related quality of life, economic and resource use evidence were conducted using the Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well as gray literature. Results: This SLR yielded 84 unique studies from: five randomized controlled trials; 54 observational studies; 12 health-related quality of life studies, none with utility values; no economic evaluation studies; and 16 resource use studies, none with indirect costs. Conclusion: This SLR highlights a paucity of published literature relating to randomized controlled trials, utility values, economic evaluations and indirect costs in AL amyloidosis.

Predictive factors of outcomes in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab

Daratumumab as a single agent (sDARA) or in combination with chemotherapies (cDARA) leads to impressive hematologic and organ responses in AL amyloidosis. However, predictive factors associated with outcomes, and optimal duration of therapy remain unclear. We analyzed 107 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab between 2017 and 2020. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached while the median major organ deterioration progression free survival (MOD-PFS) was 36 months in the sDARA cohort and not reached in the cDARA cohort, respectively. Hematologic response > VGPR was achieved in 81% of patients receiving sDARA and 86% of patients treated with cDARA. Several predictive factors were identified on a univariate analysis, including NTproBNP >8500 pg/mL but only achievement of at least VGPR and presence of 1q21 gain were independently associated with MOD-PFS and OS on a multivariate analysis. Finally, patients receiving > 12 cycles had significantly longer MOD-PFS (30 vs.13 months; (p = .0018) and OS (NR vs. 15 months; p < .0001). NTproBNP > 8500 pg/mL, presence of 1q21 gain and shorter duration of therapy (≤ 12 cycles) are strong negative predictive factors for outcomes with daratumumab therapy in AL amyloidosis.

AL amyloidosis: untangling new therapies

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a protein misfolding disorder characterized by the deposition of abnormal immunoglobulin light chains in fibrillary aggregates, resulting in end-organ damage. Several unique challenges face treating physicians, including delayed diagnosis, advanced vital organ involvement, and morbidity with treatment. Aggressive supportive care and risk-adapted application of plasma cell-directed therapies are the cornerstones of management. The therapeutic revolution in multiple myeloma will likely further expand the arsenal against plasma cells. Careful investigation of these agents will be critical to establish their role in this fragile population. The promise of fibril-directed therapies to restore organ function remains despite early disappointments. In this review, we discuss new therapies to tackle AL amyloidosis using a case-based approach.

Daratumumab plus CyBorD for patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis

Primary systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by a plasma cell clone of, usually low, malignant potential that expresses CD38 molecules on their surface. Treatment of AL amyloidosis is based on the elimination of the plasma cell clone. The combination of cyclophosphamide–bortezomib–dexamethasone (CyBorD) is the most widely used and is considered a standard of care; however, complete hematologic response rates and organ response rates remain unsatisfactory. Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated encouraging results, with rapid and deep responses, in patients with relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis as monotherapy with a favorable toxicity profile. The large phase-III, randomized, ANDROMEDA study evaluated the addition of daratumumab to CyBorD in previously untreated patients with AL amyloidosis and demonstrated that addition of daratumumab can substantially improve hematologic complete response rates, survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression, and organ responses. In this review, we discuss the role of daratumumab in the treatment of AL amyloidosis, its mechanism of action, and the results of ANDROMEDA study that led to the first approved therapy for AL amyloidosis.

Targeted treatments of AL and ATTR amyloidosis

The therapeutic landscape for cardiac amyloidosis is rapidly evolving. In the last decade, our focus has shifted from dealing with the inevitable complications of continued extracellular infiltration of amyloid fibrils to earlier identification of these patients with prompt initiation of targeted therapy to prevent further deposition. Although much of the focus on novel targeted therapies is within the realm of transthyretin amyloidosis, light chain amyloidosis has benefited due to an overlap particularly in the final common pathway of fibrillogenesis and extraction of amyloid fibrils from the heart. Here, we review the targeted therapeutics for transthyretin and light chain amyloidosis. For transthyretin amyloidosis, the list of current and future therapeutics continues to evolve; and therefore, it is crucial to become familiar with the underlying mechanistic pathways of the disease. Although targeted therapeutic choices in AL amyloidosis are largely driven by the hematology team, the cardiac adverse effect profiles of these therapies, particularly in those with advanced amyloidosis, provide an opportunity for early recognition to prevent decompensation and can help inform recommendations regarding therapy changes when required.

AL Amyloidosis: Current Chemotherapy and Immune Therapy Treatment Strategies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is an incurable plasma cell disorder characterized by deposition of fibrils of misfolded immunoglobulin free light chains (FLC) in target organs, leading to failure. Cardiac involvement is common in AL amyloidosis and represents the single most adverse prognostic feature. A high index of clinical suspicion with rapid tissue diagnosis and commencement of combinatorial, highly effective cytoreductive therapy is crucial to arrest the process of amyloid deposition and preserve organ function. The clinical use of molecularly targeted drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab, and risk-adjusted autologous stem cell transplant in eligible patients, has radically changed the natural history of AL amyloidosis. Here, we review the state-of-the-art treatment landscape in AL amyloidosis with an eye toward future therapeutic venues to impact the outcome of this devastating illness.

Biomarkers in AL Amyloidosis

Systemic AL amyloidosis is a rare complex hematological disorder caused by clonal plasma cells which produce amyloidogenic immunoglobulins. Outcome and prognosis is the combinatory result of the extent and pattern of organ involvement secondary to amyloid fibril deposition and the biology and burden of the underlying plasma cell clone. Prognosis, as assessed by overall survival, and early outcomes is determined by degree of cardiac dysfunction and current staging systems are based on biomarkers that reflect the degree of cardiac damage. The risk of progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis is assessed by renal staging systems. Longer-term survival and response to treatment is affected by markers of the underlying plasma cell clone; the genetic background of the clonal disease as evaluated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in particular has predictive value and may guide treatment selection. Free light chain assessment forms the basis of hematological response criteria and minimal residual disease as assessed by sensitive methods is gradually being incorporated into clinical practice. However, sensitive biomarkers that could aid in the early diagnosis and that could reflect all aspects of organ damage and disease biology are needed and efforts to identify them are continuous.

How I Treat AL Amyloidosis

The treatment of patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a challenge to hematologists. Despite its generally small size, the underlying clone causes a rapidly progressing, often devastating multiorgan dysfunction through the toxic light chains that form amyloid deposits. Clinical manifestations are deceitful and too often recognized at an irreversible stage. However, hematologists are in the unique position to diagnose AL amyloidosis at a pre-symptomatic stage checking biomarkers of amyloid organ involvement in patients with monoclonal gammopathies at higher risk to develop the disease. Adequate technology and expertise are needed for a prompt and correct diagnosis, particularly for ruling out non-AL amyloidoses that are now also treatable. Therapy should be carefully tailored based on severity of organ involvement and clonal characteristics, and early and continual monitoring of response is critical. Three recent randomized clinical trials moved AL amyloidosis to evidence-based era. Above all, the daratumumab-bortezomib combination is a new standard-of-care for newly diagnosed patients inducing rapid and deep responses that translate into high rates of organ response. The availability of new effective drugs allows to better personalize the therapy, reduce toxicity, and improve outcomes. Patients should be treated within clinical trials whenever possible.

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis: results from a large cohort of patients with long follow-up

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) is a standard treatment in relapsed/refractory immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis (RRAL). We retrospectively investigated toxicity, efficacy and prognostic markers in 260 patients with RRAL. Patients received a median of two prior treatment lines (68% had been bortezomib-refractory; 33% had received high-dose melphalan). The median treatment duration was four cycles. The 3-month haematological response rate was 31% [very good haematological response (VGHR) in 18%]. The median follow-up was 56·5 months and the median overall survival (OS) and haematological event-free survival (haemEFS) were 32 and 9 months. The 2-year dialysis rate was 15%. VGHR resulted in better OS (62 vs. 26 months, P < 0·001). Cardiac progression predicted worse survival (22 vs. 40 months, P = 0·027), although N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) increase was frequently observed. Multivariable analysis identified these prognostic factors: NT-proBNP for OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1·71; P < 0·001]; gain 1q21 for haemEFS (HR 1·68, P = 0·014), with a trend for OS (HR 1·47, P = 0·084); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) and light chain isotype for OS (HR 2·22, P < 0·001; HR 1·62, P = 0·016) and haemEFS (HR 1·88, P < 0·001; HR 1·59, P = 0·008). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0·71, P = 0·004) and 24-h proteinuria (HR 1·10, P = 0·004) were prognostic for renal survival. In conclusion, clonal and organ biomarkers at baseline identify patients with favourable outcome, while VGHR and cardiac progression define prognosis during RD treatment.

Current Updates on the Management of AL Amyloidosis

Systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare but fatal disease. It results from clonal proliferation of plasma cells with excessive production of insoluble misfolded proteins that aggregate in the extracellular matrix, causing damage to the normal architecture and function of various organs. For decades, treatment for AL amyloidosis was based mainly on therapeutic agents previously studied for its more common counterpart, multiple myeloma. As the prevalence and incidence of AL amyloidosis have increased, ongoing research has been conducted with treatments typically used in myeloma with varying success. In this review, we focus on current treatment strategies and updates to clinical guidelines and therapeutics for AL amyloidosis.

Genetic pathogenesis of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: basic characteristics and clinical applications

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) is an indolent plasma cell disorder characterized by free immunoglobulin light chain (FLC) misfolding and amyloid fibril deposition. The cytogenetic pattern of AL shows profound similarity with that of other plasma cell disorders but harbors distinct features. AL can be classified into two primary subtypes: non-hyperdiploidy and hyperdiploidy. Non-hyperdiploidy usually involves immunoglobulin heavy chain translocations, and t(11;14) is the hallmark of this disease. T(11;14) is associated with low plasma cell count but high FLC level and displays distinct response outcomes to different treatment modalities. Hyperdiploidy is associated with plasmacytosis and subclone formation, and it generally confers a neutral or inferior prognostic outcome. Other chromosome abnormalities and driver gene mutations are considered as secondary cytogenetic aberrations that occur during disease evolution. These genetic aberrations contribute to the proliferation of plasma cells, which secrete excess FLC for amyloid deposition. Other genetic factors, such as specific usage of immunoglobulin light chain germline genes and light chain somatic mutations, also play an essential role in amyloid fibril deposition in AL. This paper will propose a framework of AL classification based on genetic aberrations and discuss the amyloid formation of AL from a genetic aspect.

Future Perspectives

Opportunities and challenges in the field of systemic amyloidosis can be grouped into 4 categories. First, a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease is required. Second, a greater awareness of the disease, which will lead to an earlier diagnosis, is imperative. Third, end points for interventional trials are required to convey us to our fourth aspirations, which are novel therapies for patients with light chain amyloidosis.

Acquired and inherited amyloidosis: Knowledge driving patients' care

Until recently, systemic amyloidoses were regarded as ineluctably disabling and life-threatening diseases. However, this field has witnessed major advances in the last decade, with significant improvements in therapeutic options and in the availability of accurate and non-invasive diagnostic tools. Outstanding progress includes unprecedented hematological response rates provided by risk-adapted regimens in light chain (AL) amyloidosis and the approval of innovative pharmacological agents for both hereditary and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR). Moreover, the incidence of secondary (AA) amyloidosis has continuously reduced, reflecting advances in therapeutics and overall management of several chronic inflammatory diseases. The identification and validation of novel therapeutic targets has grounded on a better knowledge of key molecular events underlying protein misfolding and aggregation and on the increasing availability of diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers of organ damage and response to treatment. In this review, we focus on these recent advancements and discuss how they are translating into improved outcomes. Neurological involvement dominates the clinical picture in transthyretin and gelsolin inherited amyloidosis and has a significant impact on disease course and management in all patients. Neurologists, therefore, play a major role in improving patients' journey to diagnosis and in providing early access to treatment in order to prevent significant disability and extend survival.

Treatment of AL Amyloidosis: Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Statement 2020 Update

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder leading to progressive and life-threatening organ failure. The heart and the kidneys are the most commonly involved organs, but almost any organ can be involved. Because of the nonspecific presentation, diagnosis delay is common, and many patients are diagnosed with advanced organ failure. In the era of effective therapies and improved outcomes for patients with AL amyloidosis, the importance of early recognition is further enhanced as the ability to reverse organ dysfunction is limited in those with a profound organ failure. As AL amyloidosis is an uncommon disorder and given patients' frailty and high early death rate, management of this complex condition is challenging. The treatment of AL amyloidosis is based on various anti-plasma cell therapies. These therapies are borrowed and customized from the treatment of multiple myeloma, a more common disorder. However, a growing number of phase 2/3 studies dedicated to the AL amyloidosis population are being performed, making treatment decisions more evidence-based. Supportive care is an integral part of management of AL amyloidosis because of the inherent organ dysfunction, limiting the delivery of effective therapy. This extensive review brings an updated summary on the management of AL amyloidosis, sectioned into the 3 pillars for survival improvement: early disease recognition, anti-plasma cell therapy, and supportive care.

Comprehensive Review of AL amyloidosis: some practical recommendations

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is among the more common and more severe of the amyloidoses usually involving the slow proliferation of a bone-marrow-residing plasma cell (PC) clone and the secretion of unstable immunoglobulin-free light chains (FLC) that infiltrate peripheral tissues and result in detrimental end-organ damage. Disease presentation is rather vague, and the hallmark of treatment is early diagnosis before irreversible end-organ damage. Once diagnosed, treatment decision is transplant-driven whereby ~20% of patients are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with or without bortezomib-based induction. In the setting of ASCT-ineligibility, bortezomib plays a central role in upfront treatment with the recent addition of daratumumab to the current emerging standard of care. In general, management of AL amyloidosis is aimed at achieving deep, durable responses with very close monitoring for early detection of relapse/refractory disease. This article provides a comprehensive review of the management of patients with AL amyloidosis including goals of therapy, current treatment guidelines in the setting of both ASCT-eligibility and ineligibility, treatment response monitoring recommendations, toxicity management, and treatment of relapse/refractory disease.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2021

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) commonly presents with nephrotic range proteinuria, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, nondiabetic peripheral neuropathy, unexplained hepatomegaly or diarrhea, and should be considered in patients presenting with these symptoms. More importantly, patients being monitored for smoldering multiple myeloma and a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are at risk for developing AL amyloidosis. MGUS and myeloma patients that have atypical features, including unexplained weight loss; lower extremity edema, early satiety, and dyspnea on exertion should be considered at risk for light chain amyloidosis. Overlooking the diagnosis of light chain amyloidosis leading to therapy delay is common, and it represents an error of diagnostic consideration. Herein we provide a review of established and investigational treatments for patients with AL amyloidosis and provide algorithms for workup and management of these patients.

Sequential response-driven bortezomib-based therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in AL amyloidosis

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is highly effective in selected patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Bortezomib, preceding or following ASCT, improves responses. Satisfactory responses, including at least a partial response, very good partial response (VGPR) with organ response, or complete response, can be observed after induction therapy alone. We report 139 patients treated upfront with cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (CyBorD), followed by ASCT only if response was unsatisfactory. Only 1 treatment-related death was observed. After CyBorD, hematologic response (HR) rate was 68% (VGPR or better, 51%), with 45% satisfactory responses. Transplant was performed in 55 (40%) subjects and resulted in an 80% HR rate (65% ≥ VGPR). Five-year survival was 86% and 84% in patients treated with ASCT or CyBorD alone, respectively (P = .438). Also, 6- and 12- month landmark analyses did not show differences in survival. Duration of response was not different in the 2 groups (60 vs 49 months; P = .670). Twenty-one (15%) patients with an unsatisfactory response to CyBorD could not undergo ASCT because of ineligibility or refusal; instead, they received rescue chemotherapy, with HR in 38% of cases and 51% 5-year survival. This sequential response-driven approach, offering ASCT to patients who do not attain satisfactory response to upfront CyBorD, is very safe and effective in AL amyloidosis.

Assessment of minimal residual disease using multiparametric flow cytometry in patients with AL amyloidosis

Despite achieving a hematologic complete response after treatment, many patients with AL amyloidosis do not attain recovery of organ function and/or experience hematologic relapse. A persistent plasma cell clone producing amyloidogenic light chains at levels below the detection threshold of traditional serologic methods is hypothesized to impede organ response in some patients. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) may therefore have clinical importance as a more stringent treatment response tool for patients in a hematologic complete response. We used 2-tube, 10-color combination multiparametric flow cytometry to assess for MRD at a minimum sensitivity of 1 in 105 nucleated cells. Of 65 patients in hematologic complete response, 36 (55%) were found to have a residual clonal plasma cell population in the bone marrow. Comparing the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, renal response was observed in 88% vs 64% (P = .06), cardiac response in 75% vs 59% (P = .45), and any organ response in 90% vs 75% (P = .20) of patients. Depth of organ response as measured by the percent decrease in 24-hour proteinuria and brain natriuretic peptide was 96% vs 91% (P = .16) and 55% vs 46% (P = .66), respectively. These data suggest a possible correlation between MRD negativity and higher probability of organ response after treatment in AL amyloidosis. Future prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to determine the clinical relevance of these improvements. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00898235.

Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches to Cardiac Amyloidosis

Often considered a rare disease, cardiac amyloidosis is increasingly recognized by practicing clinicians. The increased rate of diagnosis is in part due the aging of the population and increasing incidence and prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis with advancing age, as well as the advent of noninvasive methods using nuclear scintigraphy to diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis due to either variant or wild type transthyretin without a biopsy. Perhaps the most important driver of the increased awareness is the elucidation of the biologic mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of cardiac amyloidosis which have led to the development of several effective therapies with differing mechanisms of actions. In this review, the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of cardiac amyloidosis due to light chain (AL) or transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis are delineated as well as the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape that has emerged from a better pathophysiologic understanding of disease development.

Management of AL amyloidosis in 2020

In amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis, a small B-cell clone, most commonly a plasma cell clone, produces monoclonal light chains that exert organ toxicity and deposit in tissue in the form of amyloid fibrils. Organ involvement determines the clinical manifestations, but symptoms are usually recognized late. Patients with disease diagnosed at advanced stages, particularly when heart involvement is present, are at high risk of death within a few months. However, symptoms are always preceded by a detectable monoclonal gammopathy and by elevated biomarkers of organ involvement, and hematologists can screen subjects who have known monoclonal gammopathy for amyloid organ dysfunction and damage, allowing for a presymptomatic diagnosis. Discriminating patients with other forms of amyloidosis is difficult but necessary, and tissue typing with adequate technology available at referral centers, is mandatory to confirm AL amyloidosis. Treatment targets the underlying clone and should be risk adapted to rapidly administer the most effective therapy patients can safely tolerate. In approximately one-fifth of patients, autologous stem cell transplantation can be considered up front or after bortezomib-based conditioning. Bortezomib can improve the depth of response after transplantation and is the backbone of treatment of patients who are not eligible for transplantation. The daratumumab+bortezomib combination is emerging as a novel standard of care in AL amyloidosis. Treatment should be aimed at achieving early and profound hematologic response and organ response in the long term. Close monitoring of hematologic response is vital to shifting nonresponders to rescue treatments. Patients with relapsed/refractory disease are generally treated with immune-modulatory drugs, but daratumumab is also an effective option.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of amyloid cardiomyopathy

Amyloidosis is a disorder characterized by misfolded precursor proteins that form depositions of fibrillar aggregates with an abnormal cross-beta-sheet conformation, known as amyloid, in the extracellular space of several tissues. Although there are more than 30 known amyloidogenic proteins, both hereditary and non-hereditary, cardiac amyloidosis (CA) typically arises from either misfolded transthyretin (ATTR amyloidosis) or immunoglobulin light-chain aggregation (AL amyloidosis). Its prevalence is more common than previously thought, especially among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and aortic stenosis. If there is a clinical suspicion of CA, focused echocardiography, laboratory screening for the presence of a monoclonal protein (serum and urinary electrophoresis with immunofixation and serum free light-chain ratio), and cardiac scintigraphy with 99mtechnetium-labeled bone-tracers are sensitive and specific initial diagnostic tests. In some cases, more advanced/invasive techniques are necessary and, in the last several years, treatment options for both AL CA and ATTR CA have rapidly expanded. It is important to note that the aims of therapy are different. Systemic AL amyloidosis requires treatment targeted against the abnormal plasma cell clone, whereas therapy for ATTR CA must be targeted to the production and stabilization of the TTR molecule. It is likely that a multistep treatment approach will be optimal for both AL CA and ATTR CA. Additionally, treatment of CA includes the management of restrictive cardiomyopathy with preserved or reduced ejection fraction in addition to treating the amyloid deposition. Future studies are necessary to define optimal management strategies for AL CA and ATTR CA and confirm cardiac response to therapy.

A safety review of drug treatments for patients with systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis

INTRODUCTION

In AL amyloidosis, a usually small plasma cell clone secretes unstable, amyloid-forming light chains, causing cytotoxicity and progressive (multi)organ function deterioration. Treatment aims at reducing/eradicating the underlying clone, to reduce/zero the supply of the amyloidogenic protein and halt the amyloidogenic cascade.

AREAS COVERED

Safety data of alkylating agents, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies from clinical trials are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Drugs used to treat AL amyloidosis are derived from experience with multiple myeloma or other B cell malignancies. However, treating AL amyloidosis is particularly challenging, as it implies delivering anti-neoplastic therapy to a hematologic malignancy directly causing (multi)organ function deterioration, often in elderly subjects with other comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy. This unique combination translates in increased patients' frailty and higher sensitivity toward treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, dose/schedule adjustments and special precautions are needed when translating treatment experience from multiple myeloma or other B cell malignancies to AL amyloidosis. Treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis should be risk adapted, tailored to individual patients' risk profile, considering the type and extent of organ involvement, and eventual comorbidity. As several classes of effective anti-plasma cell or B cell drugs are available, therapeutic choices are also influenced by individual drug's safety profile.

Daratumumab in the Treatment of Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by a small B cell, most commonly a plasma cell (PC), clone that produces toxic light chains (LC) that cause organ dysfunction and deposits in tissues. Due to the production of amyloidogenic, misfolded LC, AL PCs display peculiar biologic features. The small, indolent plasma cell clone is an ideal target for anti-CD38 immunotherapy. A recent phase III randomized study showed that in newly diagnosed patients, the addition of daratumumab to the standard of care increased the rate and depth of the hematologic response and granted more frequent organ responses. In the relapsed/refractory setting, daratumumab alone or as part of combination regimens gave very promising results. It is likely that daratumumab-based regimens will become new standards of care in AL amyloidosis. Another anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, isatuximab, is at an earlier stage of development as a treatment for AL amyloidosis. The ability to target CD38 on the amyloid PC offers new powerful tools to treat AL amyloidosis. Future studies should define the preferable agents to combine with daratumumab upfront and in the rescue setting and assess the role of maintenance. In this review, we summarize the rationale for using anti-CD38 antibodies in the treatment of AL amyloidosis.