Merkel-cell carcinoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing Merkel-cell carcinoma (MCC). •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the multidisciplinary group of experts’ collective opinion. •The guideline covers clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •Algorithms for the management of locoregional and inoperable/metastatic disease are provided. •A multidisciplinary team with a high level of expertise in MCC should diagnose and make decisions about therapy.

Review of Merkel cell carcinoma with solitary pancreatic metastases mimicking primary neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) but metastases to the pancreas are very rare. There are only a few cases of isolated metastases of MCC to the pancreas. Because of this rarity, it can be wrongly diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas(pNET), especially the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) subtype, in which the treatment is vastly different than that of MCC with isolated metastases of the pancreas.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed and google scholar databases was performed to obtain the literature on MCC with pancreatic metastases, using the following search terms: Merkel cell carcinoma, pancreas, and metastases. Results are limited to the following available article types: case reports and case series. We identified 45 cases of MCC with pancreatic metastases from the PubMed and Google Scholar database search and examined their potential relevance. Only 22 cases with isolated pancreatic metastases were taken for review including one case that we encountered.

RESULTS

The results from our review of cases of isolated pancreatic metastases of MCC were compared to the characteristics of the poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNEC). We found the following: (a) MCC with isolated pancreatic metastases occurred at an older age than PNEC and with male gender predominance (b) Most of the metastases occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis of MCC (c) Resection of pancreatic mass was the first line treatment in case of resectable PNECs whereas resection of metastases was infrequently performed in MCC with pancreatic metastases.

Expression of Genes Associated With Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Merkel Cell Polyomavirus-Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Two accepted possible pathways for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) pathogenesis include the clonal integration of the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) into the neoplastic cells and by UV irradiation. We hypothesize that, in UV etiology, the expression of genes associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) would be higher in MCPyV-negative MCCs. We compared RNA expression in 16 MCPyV-negative with that in 14 MCPyV-positive MCCs in 30 patients using NanoString panel of 760 gene targets as an exploratory method. Subsequently, we confirmed the findings with a publicly available RNA sequencing data set. The NanoString method showed that 29 of 760 genes exhibited significant deregulation. Ten genes (CD44, COL6A3, COL11A1, CXCL8, INHBA, MMP1, NID2, SPP1, THBS1, and THY1) were part of the EMT pathway. The expression of CDH1/E-cadherin, a key EMT gene, and TWIST1, regulator gene of EMT, was higher in MCPyV-negative tumors. To further investigate the expression of EMT genes in MCPyV-negative MCCs, we analyzed publicly available RNA sequencing data of 111 primary MCCs. Differential expression and gene set enrichment analysis of 35 MCPyV-negative versus 76 MCPyV-positive MCCs demonstrated significantly higher expression of EMT-related genes and associated pathways such as Notch signaling, TGF-β signaling, and Hedgehog signaling, and UV response pathway in MCPyV-negative MCCs. The significance of the EMT pathway in MCPyV-negative MCCs was confirmed independently by a coexpression module analysis. One of the modules (M3) was specifically activated in MCPyV-negative MCCs and showed significant enrichment for genes involved in EMT. A network analysis of module M3 revealed that CDH1/E-cadherin was among the most connected genes (hubs). E-cadherin and LEF1 immunostains demonstrated significantly more frequent expression in MCPvV-negative versus MCPyV-positive tumors (P < .0001). In summary, our study showed that the expression of EMT-associated genes is higher in MCPyV-negative MCC. Because EMT-related proteins can be targeted, the identification of EMT pathways in MCPyV-negative MCCs is of potential therapeutic relevance.

Current and preclinical treatment options for Merkel cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive form of skin cancer with neuroendocrine features. The origin of this cancer is still unclear, but research in the last 15 years has demonstrated that MCC arises via two distinct etiologic pathways, i.e. virus and UV-induced. Considering the high mortality rate and the limited therapeutic options available, this review aims to highlight the significance of MCC research and the need for advancement in MCC treatment.

AREAS COVERED

With the advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, we now have treatment options providing a survival benefit for patients with advanced MCC. However, the issue of primary and acquired resistance to these therapies remains a significant concern. Therefore, ongoing efforts seeking additional therapeutic targets and approaches for MCC therapy are a necessity. Through a comprehensive literature search, we provide an overview on recent preclinical and clinical studies with respect to MCC therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, the only evidence-based therapy for MCC is immune checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for advanced patients. Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and combined immune checkpoint blockade are promising treatment options.

An update on Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer of the skin characterized by a neuroendocrine phenotype and an aggressive clinical behavior. It frequently originates in sun-exposed body areas, and its incidence has steadily increased in the last three decades. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure are the main causative agents of MCC, and distinct molecular features have been documented in virus-positive and virus-negative malignancies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized tumors, but even when integrated with adjuvant radiotherapy is able to definitively cure only a fraction of MCC patients. While characterized by a high objective response rate, chemotherapy is associated with a short-lasting benefit of approximately 3 months. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors including avelumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with stage IV MCC, and investigations on their use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting are currently underway. Addressing the needs of those patients who do not persistently benefit from immunotherapy is currently one of the most compelling unmet needs in the field, and multiple clinical trials of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), therapeutic vaccines, immunocytokines as well as innovative forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapies are under clinical scrutiny at present.

Current treatments and emerging therapies of human polyomavirus-associated skin diseases: a comprehensive review

Since Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) was linked as the predominant etiology of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in 2008, three additional human polyomaviruses (HPyV) have been definitively linked to cutaneous diseases-trichodysplasia spinulosa virus (TSPyV) and human polyomavirus 6 and 7 (HPyV6, HPyV7). TSPyV contributes to the development of trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS), and HPyV6/7 is associated closely with the eruption of pruritic and dyskeratotic dermatoses (PDD). Clinically, MCC is treated with surgical excision and radiation with adjuvant chemotherapy, although newer treatment options include immune checkpoint inhibition. These novel immunotherapies hold promise for the treatment of metastatic MCC, but resistance and side effects prevent a significant proportion of patients from realizing their benefits. Based on previous case reports, the standard of care for the less deadly but disfiguring cutaneous disease TS include immunosuppressant (IS) reduction, the use of antivirals such as cidofovir (CDV) or valganciclovir (VGCV), or a combination of these treatments. Similar treatments were attempted for PDD, but oral acitretin was found to be most effective. As MCC, TS, and PDD are rare diseases, further research is required for effective treatments. In this review, we summarize clinical trials, preclinical studies, and case reports that present outcomes and side effects of current and emerging treatments for HPyV-associated cutaneous diseases, offering a comprehensive resource for clinical application and prospective clinical trials.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma-Update on Diagnosis, Management and Future Perspectives

MCC is a rare but highly aggressive skin cancer. The identification of the driving role of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in the oncogenesis of MCC allowed a better understanding of its biological behavior. The presence of MCPyV-specific T cells and lymphocytes exhibiting an 'exhausted' phenotype in the tumor microenvironment along with the high prevalence of immunosuppression among affected patients are strong indicators of the immunogenic properties of MCC. The use of immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of patients with advanced MCC with anti-PD-1/PD L1 blockade, providing objective responses in as much as 50-70% of cases when used in first-line treatment. However, acquired resistance or contraindication to immune checkpoint inhibitors can be an issue for a non-negligible number of patients and novel therapeutic strategies are warranted. This review will focus on current management guidelines for MCC and future therapeutic perspectives for advanced disease with an emphasis on molecular pathways, targeted therapies, and immune-based strategies. These new therapies alone or in combination with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could enhance immune responses against tumor cells and overcome acquired resistance to immunotherapy.

Scientific and clinical developments in Merkel cell carcinoma: A polyomavirus-driven, often-lethal skin cancer

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a primary neuroendocrine skin cancer that recurs in ~40% of cases. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV)-induced mutations are two major causative factors of MCC. Virus-positive MCCs express polyomavirus oncoproteins that are highly immunogenic yet are required for ongoing tumor growth. Virus-negative MCCs have a high burden of UV-DNA mutations that encode tumor-specific UV-neoantigens. Thus, both UV- and virus-induced MCCs are highly immunogenic, enabling diverse T-cell targeted therapies. Optimal MCC management is challenging given its rarity, aggressive nature, rapidly evolving care guidelines, and fundamental differences in management compared to other skin cancers. MCC is often managed aggressively with extensive surgery, radiotherapy or systemic therapy, frequently leading to toxicities that might have been avoidable while still achieving optimal disease control. Thus, multi-disciplinary care is crucial for providing patients with the best possible outcomes. The outlook for many patients with advanced MCC has progressed remarkably over the past decade due to PD-1 pathway blocking agents that provide durable benefit for a substantial subset of MCC patients. The management of early-stage MCC has also improved due to better approaches to integrate surgery and radiotherapy. Prognostic accuracy and ongoing surveillance have advanced due to stage-specific recurrence data and sophisticated "liquid biopsies" that allow early detection of disease recurrence. Here we summarize both recent striking progress and pressing challenges such as PD-(L)1-refractory MCC, and management of MCC patients with immune dysfunction. We also highlight diverse resources to allow providers to take advantage of recent progress in this fast-moving field.

An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response

Background

The use of targeted therapy remains a treatment consideration for some patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, supportive data on the use of targeted therapy approaches are limited. Thus, we sought to evaluate the responsiveness of targeted agents in patients with advanced MCC.

Methods

An institutional MCC database identified patients who were treated with targeted therapy. For the purpose of this study, targeted therapy was defined as any multi‐targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor or inhibitor of the PI3K‐pathway. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. A subset of patient samples underwent next‐generation sequencing (NGS), Merkel cell polyomavirus testing, and PD‐L1/PD‐1 expression testing.

Results

Nineteen patients with MCC treated with targeted therapy were identified, 21 targeted therapy regimens were evaluable for response in 18 patients. Four of twenty‐one (19%) of evaluable regimens were associated with clinical benefit with the best overall response of SD. The durations of SD were 13.6 months (59 weeks), 9.7 months (42 weeks), 7.6 months (33 weeks), and 7.2 months (31 weeks). Of the four patients who derived clinical benefit, three were treated with pazopanib alone and one was treated with pazopanib plus everolimus. No difference in the rate of clinical benefit between molecular disease subtypes was detected nor was associated with any specific genomic alteration.

Conclusion

In our series, targeted agents elicited a disease control rate of 19% in patients with advanced MCC, with a best overall response of SD. Pazopanib alone or in combination exhibited a rate of disease control of 36% (4 of 11 with SD ≥6 months).

Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the south-east of England

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy of the skin. Its incidence is increasing with half of cases involving the head and neck. To the best of our knowledge, few large studies have been published in the UK, and to date this is the largest reported series of head and neck MCC. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients with MCC in three hospitals in the south-east of England over a 12-year period (2008-2019). Diagnosis was based on histological data following biopsy. Overall survival and disease-specific survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Fifty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (24 stage I, 22 stage II, 9 stage III, and 3 unclassified). Median disease-free survival was 36 months (95% CI 0 to 77.2) and median overall survival 50 months (95% CI 29.9 to 70). Overall five-year survival was 34.4% (95% CI 17% to 52%) with two-year survival at 62% (95% CI 48% to 76%). Five-year disease-free survival was 26.7% (95% CI 17 to 52%) with two-year disease-free survival at 54% (95% CI 40% to 68%). To date, this is the largest UK based study reporting overall and disease-free survival associated with MCC of the head and neck. Half the patients presented late, and surgery was the mainstay of treatment, augmented by adjuvant radiotherapy. There is a need to better stratify patients at risk of developing metastatic disease, with the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), as immunotherapy and targeted agents are now available to treat advanced disease.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and extremely aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, with increasing incidence worldwide. This review intends to propose a comprehensive evaluation of MCC epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenetic mechanisms, diagnosis, and therapies. A section is dedicated to immunological aspects and another to the involvement of angiogenesis and angiogenic growth factors in MCC progression, proposing novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Advanced MCC tumors have been treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors with effective results. Therefore, the state of art of this immunotherapy is also examined, reporting on the most recent clinical trials in the field. We conclude by underlining the achievements in the understanding of MCC pathology and indicating the present needs for effective diagnosis and therapeutic management of the disease.

How we treat Merkel cell carcinoma: within and beyond current guidelines

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer associated with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Optimal care of this potentially life-threatening cancer is critical but challenging because: physicians are often unfamiliar with its management due to rarity, and MCC management remains controversial, in part because it is rapidly evolving across multiple specialties. While guidelines offer a broad overview of management, they are often not sufficient when making decisions for individual patients. Herein, we present a literature review as well as practical approaches adopted at our institutions for staging, surveillance and therapy of MCC. Each of these areas are discussed in light of how they can be appropriately customized for prevalent but challenging situations. We also provide representative examples of MCC patient scenarios and how they were managed by a multidisciplinary team to identify suitable evidence-based, individualized treatment plans.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a skin cancer with a high risk of recurrence and distant spread. Optimal care of this cancer is important. However, management is challenging because it is rare and its treatment is continuously evolving across multiple specialties. While treatment guidelines offer a broad overview of management, they are often not detailed enough to provide appropriate patient-specific assistance. Herein, we present a review of recent studies and our suggestions relevant to MCC staging, surveillance and treatment options. Each of these areas are discussed in light of how they can be appropriately customized for challenging situations often encountered by practitioners. We also provide representative examples of MCC patient scenarios and how they were managed by a multidisciplinary team to identify evidence-based, individualized treatment plans.

Management of regional metastatic disease in cutaneous malignancy of the head and neck. 3. Merkel cell carcinoma

This is the third of three articles that give an overview of the current evidence for management of the neck and parotid in patients with cutaneous cancers of the head and neck. In this paper we discuss Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and review the latest evidence for management of the regional nodes.

Treatment of Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Current Therapeutic Options and Novel Immunotherapy Approaches

Advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a very aggressive, rare neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with a high frequency of locoregional recurrence and metastasis, and a high mortality rate. Surgical resection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and radiotherapy represent the gold standard of treatment in patients with localized disease, while chemotherapy has a significant role in the treatment of advanced disease. However, no definitive evidence on the survival impact of radiotherapy in the advanced stages has been provided to date, and response to chemotherapy remains brief in the majority of cases, indicating an urgent need for alternative approaches. Biological and genome sequencing studies have implicated multiple molecular pathways in MCC, thus leading to the development of new agents that target angiogenic factors, anti-apoptosis molecules, poly-ADP ribose polymerase, intracellular signal proteins such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and peptide receptors such as somatostatin receptors. More recently, immunotherapy agents such as avelumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab, which act by blocking the programmed cell-death (PD)-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint, have shown promising results, especially in the advanced setting, and should now be considered standard of care for metastatic MCC. Current research is focusing on developing new immunotherapeutic strategies, identifying predictive biomarker to aid in the selection of patients responsive to immunotherapy, and defining combination approaches to increase efficacy in refractory patients.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Updates on Staging and Management

Merkel cell carcinoma is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma with increasing incidence over the past few decades. The TNM Staging System used for Merkel cell carcinoma was updated by the American Joint Committee on Cancer in 2017. Clinical practice guidelines were updated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on August 31, 2018. This article reviews the most recent evidence-based updates on staging and management.

Immune checkpoint blockade for Merkel cell carcinoma: actual findings and unanswered questions

PURPOSE

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from the skin. We aimed to review and deal with some of the most relevant controversial topics on the correct use of immunotherapy for the treatment of MCC.

METHODS

The primary search was carried out via PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (until 31st May, 2018), while other articles and guidelines were retrieved from related papers or those referenced in these papers. Additionally, we performed an extensive search on ClinicalTrials.gov to gather information on the ongoing clinical trials related to this specific topic.

RESULTS

We performed an up-to-date critical review taking into account the results of both retrospective and prospective published studies evaluating these issues: Are there any predictive criteria of response to immunotherapy? What is the correct place of immunotherapy in the treatment algorithm of MCC? What is the best choice after immunotherapy failure? What to do with patients for whom immunotherapy is not been feasible or contraindicated? How long should immunotherapy be prolonged, and what follow-up should be offered after complete response?

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic landscape of MCC is rapidly evolving: many open issues will probably be resolved, and many other questions are likely to arise in the next few years. The results of ongoing prospective clinical trials and of several other studies on these issues are eagerly awaited.

Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine the efficacy and safety profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This prospective, phase II, single-institution trial enrolled patients with platinum-failure, recurrent/metastatic MCC to receive cabozantinib 60 mg orally daily until disease progression, withdrawal from study, or severe toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Immunohistochemistry for VEGFR-2, MET, and HGF expression and next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue were performed and correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

Eight patients were accrued from January 24, 2014, to June 8, 2016. The study was closed prematurely because of toxicity and lack of responses. The most frequent adverse events were grades 1 and 2 and included anorexia, fatigue, nausea, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia. Two patients developed nonhealing, painful ulcers and tumor-skin fistula. One patient had stable disease for 8 months. One patient withdrew from the study after 2 weeks of therapy because of adverse events. Three patients required dose reduction because of toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 2.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. No expression of MET, HGF, or VEGFR-2 was identified in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry of patients' tissue samples.

CONCLUSION

Cabozantinib was poorly tolerated and did not demonstrate activity in patients with recurrent/metastatic, platinum-failure MCC. It is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation or genetic alteration in the targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02036476) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This phase II study demonstrated poor tolerability and lack of activity of cabozantinib in an unselected group of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Although it is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation and genetic alterations in targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study, this would have likely led to an extremely rare patient population that would take many years to accrue.