Management of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Cancer and the Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer

The incidence of bladder cancer has increased in the past decade, and mortality from bladder cancer remains a substantial public health burden. After 3 decades of minimal progress in the treatment of advanced-stage disease, recent advances in the genomic characterization of urothelial cancer and breakthroughs in bladder cancer therapeutics have rejuvenated the field. This review highlights the landmark clinical trials of chemotherapy in both the neoadjuvant and advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma settings. We describe treatment paradigms for multimodal treatment of locally advanced bladder cancer, including discussion on bladder preservation strategies. Lastly, we discuss novel immunomodulatory, targeted, and combination therapies in development for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant sorafenib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin administration preceding cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: An open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIUBC) should be improved. Sorafenib was combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (SGC) in an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT01222676).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After transurethral resection of the bladder, T2-T4a N0 patients received four cycles of SGC followed by cystectomy. Sorafenib 400mg q12h daily, continuously, was added to standard GC chemotherapy. In a Simon's 2-stage design, the primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pT0), assuming H0: ≤0.20 and H1: ≥0.40, with a type I and type II error of 5% and 10%, respectively.

RESULTS

From April 2011 to June 2016, 46 patients were enrolled. Pathologic T0 response was obtained in 20 patients (43.5%, 95% CI: 28.9-58.9); pT ≤ 1 in 25 (54.3%, 95% CI: 39.0-69.1). After a median follow-up of 35 months, the median progression-free survival was not reached (NR, interquartile range: 23.6-NR), nor was median overall survival (interquartile range: 30.3-NR). Hematologic and extrahematologic grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 45.6% and 26.1% of patients, respectively. In 29 samples from responders (pT ≤ 1) and nonresponders, different distribution of missense mutations involved DNA-repair genes, RAS-RAF pathway genes, chromatin-remodeling genes, and HER-family genes. ERCC1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with pT ≤ 1 response (P = 0.047). The absence of a comparator arm prevented us to quantify sorafenib contribution.

CONCLUSIONS

SGC combination was active in MIUBC, and the identified molecular features included alterations that may help personalize treatment in MIUBC with new more potent targeted agents, combined with chemotherapy.

Molecular biomarkers to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer

Cystectomy is the gold standard for treatment of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, about 50% of patients develop metastases within 2years after cystectomy and subsequently die for the disease. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before cystectomy improves the overall survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment (downstaging to ⩽pT1 at cystectomy) is a strong predictor of better disease-specific survival. Nevertheless, some patients do not benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The identification of reliable biomarkers that could enable the clinicians to identify patients who will really benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a major issue. This approach could lead to individualized therapy, in order to optimize the chance of response, avoiding the impact of neoadjuvant treatment on quality of life and the delay of cystectomy in non-responder patients. However, no molecular predictive biomarkers have shown clinical utility. This paper aims to review currently available data about biomarkers predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons

Many patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) will develop distant metastatic disease. Over the past three decades, perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been investigated for its ability to reduce the number of deaths from bladder cancer. Insufficient evidence is available to fully support the use of such chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting; however, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has become a standard of care for eligible patients based on the improved disease-specific and overall survival demonstrated in two randomized phase III trials, compared with surgery alone. For patients with disease downstaging to non-MIBC at the time of radical cystectomy as a result of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, outcomes are outstanding, with 5-year overall survival of 80-90%. Nevertheless, the inability to define before treatment the patients who will and those who will not achieve such a response has impeded the achievement of better outcomes for patients with MIBC. High-throughput DNA and RNA profiling technologies might help to overcome this barrier and enable a more-personalized approach to the use of cytotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the past 2 years, trial results have demonstrated the unprecedented ability of immune- checkpoint blockade to induce durable remissions in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed after chemotherapy; studies are now urgently needed to determine how best to incorporate this powerful therapeutic modality into the care of patients with MIBC. Herein, we review the evolution of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.