1
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Bruniera M, Torelli T, Macchi A, Stagni S, Tesone A, Silvani C, Ceccato T, Bernasconi V, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Claps M, Giannatempo P, Zimatore M, Cattaneo L, Biasoni D, Montanari E, Nicolai N. Surveillance or Dynamic Sentinel Lymph-Node Biopsy in Low-Risk Clinically N0 Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Single-Institution Real World Data. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:544-548. [PMID: 38278655 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surveillance is the standard management in low-risk cN0 penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients. However, no previous analysis focused on early and long-term outcomes of these patients. We report on main oncological outcomes of a large series of low-risk cN0 peSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1980 and 2017 included, 93 evaluable consecutive low-risk (ie, pT1a G1 cN0M0) peSCC patients underwent primary tumor surgery and either observation (74) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) (19) following a clinical diagnosis of T1 in 66 (71%), T2 in 15 (16.1%) and Tx in 12 (12.9%) patients, respectively. The statistical significance of differences in medians and proportions was tested with the Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated 5-year inguinal relapse (IR)-free survival rates. RESULTS Median age was 60 years (IQR: 50-69 years). Median follow-up was 92 months (IQR 54-133 months). Surveillance was more frequently adopted in clinical (c)T1 than in cT2 tumors (79.7% vs. 36.8%). None of 19 patients who had DSNB had nodal metastasis. Overall, 7 (7.5%) out of 93 pT1aG1cN0 peSCC patients had IR after a median interval of 9 months. Of note, 1 patient only relapsed after 12 months of surveillance. After stratification according to IR, relapses occurred more frequently in younger patients (59 vs. 64 years, P < .001). The 5-year IR-free survival rates for the entire cohort was 92% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 87-98%). CONCLUSIONS Observation is a safe and effective management for low-risk peSCC patients. Younger patients may be offered a mini-invasive staging as an alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Bruniera
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tesone
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Silvani
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Ceccato
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Bernasconi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Melanie Claps
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Zimatore
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Cattaneo
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Testis surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colecchia M, Pini GM, Pruneri G, Nicolai N, Servillo S. Soft tissue tumours of the penis. The 30-year Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano experience. Pathologica 2024; 116:46-54. [PMID: 38482674 PMCID: PMC10938274 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Small series and individual cases of penile soft tissue tumours are reported in the literature: these are rare tumours that represent less than 5% of all penile tumours. Methods Penile soft tissue tumours were collected from the archive of the Department of Pathology at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan between January 1990 and October 2021. All available medical records were retrieved and reviewed to obtain clinical information. Results Our series refers to the 30-year experience of highlighting the heterogeneity in the presentation and microscopic features of these rare sarcomas. 18 penile soft tissue tumours are described, 4 benign and 14 malignant. The mean age at diagnosis was 58.2 years (range 24-96 years) and 53.6 years among malignancies (range 24-89). The most frequent histotype was Kaposi's sarcoma (nr = 4) and very unusual histotypes were observed, namely low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, proximal type epithelioid sarcoma and the first reported case of dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the penis. Conclusions Among sarcomas of the genitourinary tract, tumours of the soft tissues of the penis are the rarest. Penile sarcomas can present at a young age. Kaposi's sarcoma in HIV-negative patients has a favorable outcome, while deep sarcomas have an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Colecchia
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Maria Pini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascia Servillo
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antonelli L, Ardizzone D, Tachibana I, Adra N, Cary C, Hugar L, Sexton WJ, Bagrodia A, Mego M, Daneshmand S, Nicolai N, Nazzani S, Giannatempo P, Franza A, Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Saoud R, Eggener S, Ho M, Oswald N, Olson K, Tryakin A, Fedyanin M, Naoun N, Javaud C, Cazzaniga W, Nicol D, Gerdtsson A, Tandstad T, Fizazi K, Fankhauser CD. Risk Factors for Relapse in Nonseminomatous Testicular Cancer After Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection With Viable Residual Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5296-5305. [PMID: 37656935 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE No consensus exists on the management of men with nonseminoma and viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND) specimen after first-line chemotherapy. We analyzed surveillance versus different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and the influence of time to pcRPLND on oncologic outcomes. METHODS Data on 117 men treated with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2018 were collected from 13 institutions. All patients had viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the pcRPLND specimen. Surgery was performed after a median of 57 days, followed by either surveillance (n = 64) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 53). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS After controlling for International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group risk group and percent of viable malignant cells found at RPLND, no difference was observed between men managed with surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.32 to 1.6]; P = .4), CSS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.39; P = .6), and OS (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.25 to 2.44]; P = .7). No statistically significant differences for PFS, CSS, or OS were observed on the basis of chemotherapy regimen or in men treated with pcRPLND ≤57 versus >57 days after first-line chemotherapy. Residual disease with <10% versus ≥10% viable cancer cells were associated with a longer PFS (HR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.29 to 8]; P = .012). Relapse in the retroperitoneum was observed in 34 (29%) men. CONCLUSION Men with a complete resection at pcRPLND and <10% viable cells have favorable outcomes without further treatment. Complete retroperitoneal resection seems more important than early pcRPLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Isamu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nabil Adra
- Division of Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Clint Cary
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lee Hugar
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA
- The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Michal Mego
- Department of Oncology, Comenius University, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franza
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Urology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ragheed Saoud
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Scott Eggener
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Matthew Ho
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Mikhail Fedyanin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Walter Cazzaniga
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boormans JL, Sylvester R, Anson-Cartwright L, Glicksman RM, Hamilton RJ, Hahn E, Daugaard G, Lauritsen J, Wagner T, Avuzzi B, Nicolai N, Del Muro XG, Aparicio J, Stalder O, Rothermundt C, Fischer S, Laguna MP. Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Clinical Stage I Seminoma: An Individual Patient Data Analysis by the European Association of Urology Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel and Guidelines Office. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00232-8. [PMID: 37951820 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relapse rate in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (SGCTT) who were undergoing surveillance after radical orchidectomy is 4-30%, depending on tumor size and rete testis invasion (RTI). However, the level of evidence supporting the use of both risk factors in clinical decision-making is low. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI SGCTT patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 1016 CSI SGCTT patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2019 with normal postorchidectomy serum tumor marker levels and undergoing surveillance were collected from nine institutions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were fit to identify the most important prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse by imaging and/or markers. Relapse probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After a median follow-up of 7.7 yr, 149 (14.7%) patients had relapsed. Categorical tumor size (≤2, >2-5, and >5 cm), presence of RTI, and lymphovascular invasion were used to form three risk groups: low (56.4%), intermediate (41.3%), and high (2.3%) risks with 5-yr cumulative relapse probabilities of 8%, 20%, and 44%, respectively. The model outperformed the currently used model with tumor size ≤4 versus >4 cm and presence of RTI (Harrell's C index 0.65 vs 0.61). The low- and intermediate-risk groups were validated successfully in an independent cohort of 285 patients. CONCLUSIONS The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in CSI SGCTT patients under surveillance is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse. PATIENT SUMMARY The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in patients with clinical stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ezra Hahn
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Wagner
- Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Xavier García Del Muro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain(1)
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain(1)
| | - Odile Stalder
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefanie Fischer
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patrikidou A, Cazzaniga W, Berney D, Boormans J, de Angst I, Di Nardo D, Fankhauser C, Fischer S, Gravina C, Gremmels H, Heidenreich A, Janisch F, Leão R, Nicolai N, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Shepherd R, Tandstad T, Nicol D. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:289-301. [PMID: 37183161 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Each year the European Association of Urology (EAU) produce a document based on the most recent evidence on the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer (TC). OBJECTIVE To represent a summarised version of the EAU guidelines on TC for 2023 with a focus on key changes in the 2023 update. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A multidisciplinary panel of TC experts, comprising urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists, reviewed the results from a structured literature search to compile the guidelines document. Each recommendation in the guidelines was assigned a strength rating. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For the 2023 EAU guidelines on TC, a review and restructure were undertaken. The key changes incorporated in the 2023 update include: new supporting text regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in males with metastatic germ cell tumours receiving chemotherapy; quality of life after treatment; an update of the histological classifications and inclusion of the World Health Organization 2022 pathological classification; inclusion of the revalidation of the 1997 International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group prognostic risk factors; and a new section covering oncology treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS The 2023 version of the EAU guidelines on TC include the highest available scientific evidence to standardise the management of TC. Better stratification and optimisation of treatment modalities will continue to improve the high survival rates for patients with TC. PATIENT SUMMARY This article presents a summary of the European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer published in 2023 and includes the latest recommendations for management of this disease. The guidelines are a valuable resource that may help patients in understanding treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Patrikidou
- Department of Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Walter Cazzaniga
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Berney
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Joost Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel de Angst
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Gravina
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital-Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Hendrik Gremmels
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Oing
- Department of Oncology, Freeman Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Robert Shepherd
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thulasi Seetha S, Garanzini E, Tenconi C, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Villa S, Chiorda BN, Badenchini F, Bertocchi E, Sanduleanu S, Pignoli E, Procopio G, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Nicolai N, Messina A. Stability of Multi-Parametric Prostate MRI Radiomic Features to Variations in Segmentation. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1172. [PMID: 37511785 PMCID: PMC10381192 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Stability analysis remains a fundamental step in developing a successful imaging biomarker to personalize oncological strategies. This study proposes an in silico contour generation method for simulating segmentation variations to identify stable radiomic features. Ground-truth annotation provided for the whole prostate gland on the multi-parametric MRI sequences (T2w, ADC, and SUB-DCE) were perturbed to mimic segmentation differences observed among human annotators. In total, we generated 15 synthetic contours for a given image-segmentation pair. One thousand two hundred twenty-four unfiltered/filtered radiomic features were extracted applying Pyradiomics, followed by stability assessment using ICC(1,1). Stable features identified in the internal population were then compared with an external population to discover and report robust features. Finally, we also investigated the impact of a wide range of filtering strategies on the stability of features. The percentage of unfiltered (filtered) features that remained robust subjected to segmentation variations were T2w-36% (81%), ADC-36% (94%), and SUB-43% (93%). Our findings suggest that segmentation variations can significantly impact radiomic feature stability but can be mitigated by including pre-filtering strategies as part of the feature extraction pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sithin Thulasi Seetha
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Enrico Garanzini
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Marenghi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Sergio Villa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Elena Bertocchi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Sebastian Sanduleanu
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Data Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Antonella Messina
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Antonelli L, Ardizzone D, Ravi P, Bagrodia A, Mego M, Daneshmand S, Nicolai N, Nazzani S, Giannatempo P, Franza A, Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Saoud R, Eggener S, Ho M, Oswald N, Olson K, Tryakin A, Fedyanin M, Naoun N, Javaud C, Fizazi K, King JM, Adra N, Douglawi A, Cary C, Sweeney C, Fankhauser CD. Risk of residual cancer after complete response following first-line chemotherapy in men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour and International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group intermediate/poor prognosis: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 182:144-154. [PMID: 36787661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current guidelines recommend surveillance in metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour patients treated with first-line-chemotherapy and a complete clinical response (normalisation of serum tumour markers and residual masses <1 cm). However, this recommendation is based on a series including patients with good prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group prognostic group (IGCCCG-PG). The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of residual teratoma and survival among patients with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG and a complete clinical response after first-line-chemotherapy. MATERIAL & METHODS This is a retrospective study of men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG, who had a complete clinical response after first-line chemotherapy. Patients were either followed by surveillance or treated with post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND). RESULTS Between 2009 and 2018, 143 men with intermediate (n = 83) or poor (n = 60) IGCCCG-PG were treated at 11 international centres. Among 33 patients treated with pcRPLND, the specimen showed teratoma and viable cancer in 16 (48%) and 4 (12%). During a median a 7-year follow-up, 20/110 (18%) patients managed with surveillance relapsed, of whom seven (6%) had a retroperitoneal-only relapse versus 2/33 patients managed with pcRPLND relapsed. No difference was observed regarding overall survival (OS) among men treated with pcRPLND or surveillance (5-year OS, 93% and 89%, p-value = 0.35). The median time-to-recurrence among men on surveillance was 1.3 years (range: 0.3-9.1), and the most common sites of relapses included retroperitoneum (11%), chest (5%), and bones (4%). CONCLUSIONS While most men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG harbour teratoma/cancer in the retroperitoneum despite a complete response to first-line-chemotherapy, only 6% managed with surveillance relapsed in the retroperitoneum. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Praful Ravi
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michal Mego
- Department of Oncology, Comenius University, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franza
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Ragheed Saoud
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Scott Eggener
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew Ho
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Mikhail Fedyanin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Jennifer M King
- Division of Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Nabil Adra
- Division of Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Antoin Douglawi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Clint Cary
- Division of Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Biasoni D, Maccauro M, Stagni S, Torelli T, Macchi A, Bernasconi V, Taverna A, Sessa D, Lorenzoni A, Piva L, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Cattaneo L, Montanari E, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:210.e1-210.e8. [PMID: 36868883 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the role of unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection (ILND) plus contralateral dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) vs. bilateral ILND in clinical N1 (cN1) penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within our institutional database (1980-2020, included), we identified 61 consecutive cT1-4 cN1 cM0 patients with histological confirmed peSCC who underwent either unilateral ILND plus DSNB (26) or bilateral ILND (35). RESULTS Median age was 54 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 48-60 years). Median follow-up was 68 months (IQR 21-105 months). Most patients had pT1 (23 %) or pT2 (54.1%), as well as G2 (47.5%) or G3 (23%) tumors, while lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 67.1% of cases. Considering a cN1 and a cN0 groin, overall 57 out of 61 patients (93.5%) had nodal disease in the cN1 groin. Conversely, only 14 out of 61 patients (22.9%) had nodal disease in the cN0 groin. 5-year IR-free survival was 91% (Confidence interval [CI] 80%-100%) for bilateral ILND group and 88% (CI 73%-100%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus DSNB group (P-value 0.8). Conversely, 5-year CSS was 76% (CI 62%-92%) for bilateral ILND group and 78% (CI 63%-97%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus contralateral DSNB group (P-value 0.9). CONCLUSIONS In patients with cN1 peSCC the risk of occult contralateral nodal disease is comparable to cN0 high risk peSCC and the gold standard, namely bilateral ILND, may be replaced by unilateral ILND and contralateral DSNB without affecting positive node detection, IRRs and CSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Maccauro
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Valentina Bernasconi
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Taverna
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Dario Sessa
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alice Lorenzoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Cattaneo
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Urology Department, IRCCS Policlinico Ca' Granda, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boormans J, Sylvester RJ, Anson-Cartwright L, Glicksman R, Hamilton RJ, Daugaard G, Lauritsen J, Wagner T, Avuzzi B, Nicolai N, Aparicio J, Garcia del Muro X, Laguna P. European Association of Urology (EAU) Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel: A new prognostic factor risk group classification for patients with clinical stage 1 seminoma in active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
410 Background: Between 4%- 30% of patients with clinical stage 1 (CS I) seminoma testis (ST) in active surveillance (AS) relapse depending on pathological risk factors tumor size (TS) and rete testis invasion (RTI). The level of evidence supporting these pathological risk factors in clinical decision-making is low due to heterogeneous study design and reporting and the difficulty to analyze patient subgroups according to combination of these factors. The objectives of the present study were to identify the most important pathological prognostic factors predicting relapse in CS I seminoma patients with normal post-orchidectomy serum tumor marker (STM) levels in AS and to construct risk-groups for guiding treatment decision-making and follow-up. Methods: Individual patient data from 1016 CS I-ST patients diagnosed between February 1994 and January 2019 in AS were collected from 9 institutions. Central pathology review was not routinely performed in all institutions; therefore, pagetoid and stromal RTI were not differentiated explicitly in most cases. Assessing patient age, pre-orchidectomy STM b-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase, pathological TS, RTI, lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), multi-focality, and GCNIS, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to identify the most important prognostic factors for the time to first relapse by imaging and/or markers (primary endpoint). Probabilities of relapse were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: After median follow-up of 7.7 years, 149 (14.7%) patients relapsed, 104 identified by imaging alone, 44 by imaging with elevated STMs and 1 by elevated STMs alone. Excluding 18 patients with unknown LVI from the multivariable analyses, TS (≤ 2 cm, between 2 and 5 cm, > 5 cm), presence of RTI and presence of LVI were used to form three risk groups: very low, low and high-risk (Table). Five-years probability of relapse varied from 8% in the very low risk-group to 44% in the high risk-group. The new model outperformed the current model with TS < 4cm vs ≥ 4 and RTI (Harrell's C index 0.65 vs 0.61) and identifies a subgroup of patients with a higher risk of relapse. Conclusions: The new risk-group stratification for CS I -ST patients in AS outperforms the histopathological model based on TS and RTI. It will serve to better inform patients on the risk of relapse during follow-up after orchidectomy but requires an independent validation. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Gedske Daugaard
- University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Thomas Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Laguna
- Istanbul Medipol University, Dept urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cattaneo L, Lagano V, Carpenito L, Napolitano C, Bersani I, Necchi A, Nicolai N, Paolini B, Colecchia M, Milione M, Pruneri G, Mortarini R, Anichini A, Giannatempo P. Digital evaluation of tumor microenvironment immune markers pre- and post-neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Pure-01 trial: An open label, single arm, phase II study). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
541 Background: PURE-01 trial enrolled 155 patients who received 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (IO) every 3 weeks before radical cystectomy. We compared tumor-microenvironment immune markers expression in pre- and post-IO TURB specimens in complete/major and non-responders to identify features associated with pathologic response. Methods: We evaluated pre-IO TURB samples of 18 complete responders (CR: ypT0), 6 major responders (MR: ypTa/ypT1) and 19 non-responders (NR: ypT2/ypT3, N0 or N+) and post-IO specimen of 7 CR, 3 MR and 14 NR. Immunohistochemistry analysis for lymphocytes (CD3, CD8, CD20), macrophages (CD68, CD163), immune checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1) and HLA molecule (MHC-I, HLA-DR, B2M) was performed. A semiquantitative count was made on all samples by 3 expert pathologists and a quantitative whole-slide digital evaluation was performed using QuPath (v.0.3) to assess cell density (cells per mm2) and expression of immune checkpoint and HLA molecules. Results: Semiquantitative count showed that seven markers (CD8, CD163, stromal or tumor PD-L1, HLA-DR and B2M on tumor cells) were significantly more expressed on TURB lesions from responders (CR + MR or CR only) compared to NR (N0 or N+) (p-value range: 0.001 to 0.048). In addition to such markers, patients achieving a CR, compared to NR, showed significantly higher expression of CD68 and CD163, of PD-1 on lymphocytes, as well as of tumor MHC-I molecules. Comparison of lesions from patients with CR vs MR revealed significant differences for CD3, CD163, PD-1 and MHC-I, all these markers being more frequently expressed on the former group compared to the latter. Digital pathology analysis confirmed this results on whole-slide evaluation showing higher density of CD8, CD163, PD-L1 and PD-1, and a higher expression B2M, MHC-I and HLA-DR (p-value range: 0.02 to 0.002) in responders. Moreover, N0 patients showed higher expression of PD-L1 and HLA-DR compared to N+ patients. Comparison of pre- and post-IO samples from NR patients showed an increased density of CD8 and CD20 cells (p-value: 0.04 and 0.01), and a decrease of CD163 and HLA-ABC (p-value: 0.003 and 0.02) expressing cells in the post-therapy samples. Conclusions: The tumor immune microenvironment of pre-therapy TURB lesions of patients achieving a complete or major pathologic response after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab shows significant enrichment for T cells and myeloid cells, for stromal or tumor PD-L1 as well as increased MHC-I expression on tumor cells compared to lesions from non responders. Post-IO surgical samples of NR patients showed downregulation of HLA-Class I antigens, in spite of increased CD8 and CD20 density. Clinical trial information: NCT02736266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cattaneo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lagano
- Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Ilaria Bersani
- Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Milione
- 1st Pathology Division - Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine - IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Mortarini
- Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Anichini
- Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nazzani S, Stagni S, Biasoni D, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Tesone A, Torelli T, Darisi R, Lo Russo V, Colbacchini C, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Claps M, Giannatempo P, Zimatore M, Cattaneo L, Montanari E, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:257-262. [PMID: 36031470 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To support laparoscopic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (L-PC-RPLND) as a potential new standard, we report on a large dataset of patients systematically undergoing L-PC-RPLND. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with unilateral residual mass (≥1 cm), normalized markers, limited encasement (<30%) of gross retroperitoneal vessels underwent unilateral L-PC-RPLND with no adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical performances, histology, hospital stay, complications within 30 days and follow-up visits were recorded. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS Between February 2011 and January 2021, 151 consecutive patients underwent L-PC-RPLND. Median size of the residual mass was 25 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 20-35 mm). Overall median operative time was 208 min (IQR 177-241) and was 51 min longer (p-value <0.001) for right L-PC-RPLNDs. Eleven procedures were converted to open surgery. Median number of removed and positive nodes was 11 (IQR 8-16) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 2-3). Nine complications (6%) occurred: two were Clavien-Dindo grade III. Definitive pathology revealed post-pubertal teratoma in 65.6%, fibro-necrotic tissue in 23.8%, teratoma with malignant somatic component in 6.6% and viable tumour in 4.0% patients. In multivariable linear regression models, fibro-necrotic tissue (32 min, CI 8.5-55.5; p < 0.01) and residual volume (1.05 min, CI 0.24-1.85; p < 0.01) achieved independent predictor status for longer operative time. All patients, but one, are alive and disease-free after a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 10, 48). CONCLUSION L-PC-RPLND, when adequately planned, is safe and effective for most patients with low to medium volume residual masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tesone
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Darisi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Lo Russo
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Colbacchini
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Melanie Claps
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Zimatore
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Cattaneo
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Testis surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Giannatempo P, Nicolai N. What is the best way to treat patients with stage IIA or IIB seminoma? Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1349-1350. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00625-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
13
|
Nazzani S, Zaborra C, Biasoni D, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Stagni S, Tesone A, Torelli T, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Morosi C, Spreafico C, Colecchia M, Marchianò A, Montanari E, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Renal tumor biopsy in patients with cT1b-T4-M0 disease susceptible to radical nephrectomy: analysis of safety, accuracy and clinical impact on definitive management. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:367-372. [PMID: 35766193 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2092549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Renal tumor biopsy was provided in patients candidate to radical nephrectomy for a renal mass ≥4 cm, to evaluate treatment deviation. METHODS Between 2008 and 2017, 102 patients with a solid renal mass ≥4 cm with no distant metastases underwent preliminary renal tumor biopsy. We investigated the proportion of patients who proceeded with radical nephrectomy, variables predicting non-renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and concordance between biopsy findings and definitive pathology. RESULTS Median tumor size was 70 mm (IQR 55-110). Clinical stage was cT1b in 41, cT2 in 33, cT3 in 25 and cT4 in three patients. A median of three (IQR 2-3) renal tumor biopsies were taken with 16/18 Gauge needles in 97% of cases. Clavien grade I complications occurred in five cases. Malignant tumors were documented in 84 patients: 78 RCCs and six non-RCCs. Fifteen biopsies documented oncocytoma and three were non-diagnostic. Grade was reported in 50 RCCs: 42 (84%) were low and eight (16%) high grade. Eighty-three patients proceeded with radical nephrectomy; six non-RCC malignant tumors underwent combined and/or intensified treatment; 13 of 15 patients with oncocytoma did not undergo radical nephrectomy (eight underwent observation). Definitive pathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases. Grade concordance was 84%, considering two tiers (high vs low grade). No preoperative clinical variable predicted definitive pathology. CONCLUSIONS Renal tumor biopsy is a safe procedure that leads to radical nephrectomy in most tumors ≥4 cm. Nonetheless, 20% of patients exhibited non-RCC histology. Renal tumor biopsy should be considered in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Zaborra
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tesone
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Spreafico
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marchianò
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Torelli T, Stagni S, Biasoni D, Lorusso V, Darisi R, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Maccauro M, Lorenzoni A, Cattaneo L, Montanari E, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection versus unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and contralateral dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(22)01215-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
15
|
Nicolai N, Nazzani S, Tesone A, Macchi A, Piva L, Salvioni R, Stagni S, Torelli T, Agostini E, Celso F, Giannatempo P, Procopio G, Avuzzi B, Lanocita R, Cattaneo L, Catanzaro M, Biasoni D. Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) as upfront management in stage II germ-cell tumours: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Tumori 2022:3008916221112697. [PMID: 35915559 PMCID: PMC10363949 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221112697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with stage II germ-cell tumours (GCT) usually undergo radiotherapy (seminoma only) or chemotherapy. Both strategies display a recognised risk of long-term side effects. We evaluated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as exclusive treatment in stage II GCT. METHODS Between 2008 and 2019 included, 66 selected stage II GCT patients underwent primary open (O-) or laparoscopic (L-)RPLND. Type of procedure and extent of dissection, operative time, node rescue, hospital stay, complications (according to Clavien-Dindo), administration of chemotherapy, relapse and site of relapse were evaluated. RESULTS Five patients had pure testicular seminoma. Nineteen (28.8%) had raised markers prior to RPLND; 48 (72.7%), 16 (24.2%) and two (3.0%) were stage IIA, IIB and IIC, respectively. O-RPLND and unilateral L-RPLND were 36 and 30 respectively. Six stage II A patients (12.5%) had negative nodes. Four patients underwent immediate adjuvant chemotherapy. One patient was lost at follow-up. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 48 (77.4%) of the 62 patients undergoing RPLND alone remained recurrence-free; one patient had an in-field recurrence following a bilateral dissection. According to procedure, number of rescued nodes (O-RPLND: 25. IQR 21-31; L-RPLND: 20, IQR 15-26; p: 0.001), hospital stay (L-RPLND: 3 days, IQR 3-4; O-RPLND: 6 days, IQR 5-8; p: .001) and grade ≥2 complications (L-RPLND 7%, O-RPLND 22%; p: 0.1) were the only significant differences. CONCLUSION Primary RPLND is safe in stage II GCT, including seminoma, and may warrant a cure rate greater than 70%. When feasible, L-RPLND may be as effective as O-RPLND with better tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Nicolai
- Testis Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Tesone
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Edoardo Agostini
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesco Celso
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Medical Oncology Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Medical Oncology Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Radiation Oncology Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Cattaneo
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thulasi Seetha S, Garanzini E, Messina A, Tenconi C, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Villa S, Noris Chiorda B, Badenchini F, Panchakumar J, Bertocchi E, Pignoli E, Valdagni R, Casale A, Nicolai N, Rancati T. PO-1595 Automated stability study on mpMRI prostate radiomics features to variations in segmentation. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03559-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
17
|
Lorusso V, Kabre B, Pignot G, Branger N, Pacchetti A, Thomassin-Piana J, Brunelle S, Nicolai N, Musi G, Salem N, Montanari E, de Cobelli O, Gravis G, Walz J. External validation of the computerized analysis of TRUS of the prostate with the ANNA/C-TRUS system: a potential role of artificial intelligence for improving prostate cancer detection. World J Urol 2022; 41:619-625. [PMID: 35249120 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03965-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) imaging has been revolutionized by the introduction of multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has always been considered a low-performance modality. To overcome this, a computerized artificial neural network analysis (ANNA/C-TRUS) of the TRUS based on an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis has been proposed. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ANNA/C-TRUS system and its ability to improve conventional TRUS in PCa diagnosis. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 64 patients with PCa and scheduled for radical prostatectomy who underwent TRUS followed by ANNA/C-TRUS analysis before the procedure. The results of ANNA/C-TRUS analysis with whole mount sections from final pathology. RESULTS On a per-sectors analysis, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were 62%, 81%, 80%, 64% and 78% respectively. The values for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer were 69%, 77%, 88%, 50% and 75%. The diagnostic values for high grade tumours were 70%, 74%, 91%, 41% and 74%, respectively. Cancer volume (≤ 0.5 or greater) did not influence the diagnostic performance of the ANNA/C-TRUS system. CONCLUSIONS ANNA/C-TRUS represents a promising diagnostic tool and application of AI for PCa diagnosis. It improves the ability of conventional TRUS to diagnose prostate cancer, preserving its simplicity and availability. Since it is an AI system, it does not hold the inter-observer variability nor a learning curve. Multicenter biopsy-based studies with the inclusion of an adequate number of patients are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Lorusso
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France.
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Boukary Kabre
- Department of Urology, CHU Yalgado Ouédraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Geraldine Pignot
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Branger
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Andrea Pacchetti
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | - Serge Brunelle
- Department of Radiology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Naji Salem
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bancroft EK, Page EC, Brook MN, Thomas S, Taylor N, Pope J, McHugh J, Jones AB, Karlsson Q, Merson S, Ong KR, Hoffman J, Huber C, Maehle L, Grindedal EM, Stormorken A, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Lalloo F, Brady AF, Bartlett M, Snape K, Hanson H, James P, McKinley J, Mascarenhas L, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Side L, Thomas T, Barwell J, Teixeira MR, Izatt L, Suri M, Macrae FA, Poplawski N, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Ahmed M, Musgrave H, Nicolai N, Greenhalgh L, Brewer C, Pachter N, Spigelman AD, Azzabi A, Helfand BT, Halliday D, Buys S, Ramon Y Cajal T, Donaldson A, Cooney KA, Harris M, McGrath J, Davidson R, Taylor A, Cooke P, Myhill K, Hogben M, Aaronson NK, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma CH, Castro E, Dearnaley D, Dias A, Dudderidge T, Eccles DM, Green K, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Foster CS, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Lilja H, Lindeman GJ, Lubinski J, Axcrona K, Mikropoulos C, Mitra AV, Moynihan C, Ni Raghallaigh H, Rennert G, Collier R, Offman J, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA. A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:1618-1631. [PMID: 34678156 PMCID: PMC8576477 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00522-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is a rare familial cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, that cause predisposition to various cancers, predominantly colorectal and endometrial cancer. Data are emerging that pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes increase the risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer. The IMPACT study is prospectively assessing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men with germline mismatch repair pathogenic variants. Here, we report the usefulness of PSA screening, prostate cancer incidence, and tumour characteristics after the first screening round in men with and without these germline pathogenic variants. METHODS The IMPACT study is an international, prospective study. Men aged 40-69 years without a previous prostate cancer diagnosis and with a known germline pathogenic variant in the MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene, and age-matched male controls who tested negative for a familial pathogenic variant in these genes were recruited from 34 genetic and urology clinics in eight countries, and underwent a baseline PSA screening. Men who had a PSA level higher than 3·0 ng/mL were offered a transrectal, ultrasound-guided, prostate biopsy and a histopathological analysis was done. All participants are undergoing a minimum of 5 years' annual screening. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence, stage, and pathology of screening-detected prostate cancer in carriers of pathogenic variants compared with non-carrier controls. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the number of cases, cancer incidence, and positive predictive values of the PSA cutoff and biopsy between carriers and non-carriers and the differences between disease types (ie, cancer vs no cancer, clinically significant cancer vs no cancer). We assessed screening outcomes and tumour characteristics by pathogenic variant status. Here we present results from the first round of PSA screening in the IMPACT study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00261456, and is now closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Sept 28, 2012, and March 1, 2020, 828 men were recruited (644 carriers of mismatch repair pathogenic variants [204 carriers of MLH1, 305 carriers of MSH2, and 135 carriers of MSH6] and 184 non-carrier controls [65 non-carriers of MLH1, 76 non-carriers of MSH2, and 43 non-carriers of MSH6]), and in order to boost the sample size for the non-carrier control groups, we randomly selected 134 non-carriers from the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cohort of the IMPACT study, who were included in all three non-carrier cohorts. Men were predominantly of European ancestry (899 [93%] of 953 with available data), with a mean age of 52·8 years (SD 8·3). Within the first screening round, 56 (6%) men had a PSA concentration of more than 3·0 ng/mL and 35 (4%) biopsies were done. The overall incidence of prostate cancer was 1·9% (18 of 962; 95% CI 1·1-2·9). The incidence among MSH2 carriers was 4·3% (13 of 305; 95% CI 2·3-7·2), MSH2 non-carrier controls was 0·5% (one of 210; 0·0-2·6), MSH6 carriers was 3·0% (four of 135; 0·8-7·4), and none were detected among the MLH1 carriers, MLH1 non-carrier controls, and MSH6 non-carrier controls. Prostate cancer incidence, using a PSA threshold of higher than 3·0 ng/mL, was higher in MSH2 carriers than in MSH2 non-carrier controls (4·3% vs 0·5%; p=0·011) and MSH6 carriers than MSH6 non-carrier controls (3·0% vs 0%; p=0·034). The overall positive predictive value of biopsy using a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 51·4% (95% CI 34·0-68·6), and the overall positive predictive value of a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 32·1% (20·3-46·0). INTERPRETATION After the first screening round, carriers of MSH2 and MSH6 pathogenic variants had a higher incidence of prostate cancer compared with age-matched non-carrier controls. These findings support the use of targeted PSA screening in these men to identify those with clinically significant prostate cancer. Further annual screening rounds will need to confirm these findings. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, The Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research support to Biomedical Research Centres (The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford; Manchester and the Cambridge Clinical Research Centre), Mr and Mrs Jack Baker, the Cancer Council of Tasmania, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Cancer Council of Victoria, Cancer Council of South Australia, the Victorian Cancer Agency, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), the Institut Català de la Salut, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Swedish Cancer Society, General Hospital in Malmö Foundation for Combating Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mark N Brook
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jana McHugh
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | - Susan Merson
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kai Ren Ong
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Hoffman
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Camilla Huber
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Astrid Stormorken
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Marion Bartlett
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | | | | | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne McKinley
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lyon Mascarenhas
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lucy Side
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Tessy Thomas
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Julian Barwell
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mohnish Suri
- Clinical Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman
- The Genetic Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel; Biology Department, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Allan D Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Waratah, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School, NSW, Australia; Cancer Genetics Clinic, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ashraf Azzabi
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brian T Helfand
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Division of Urology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Dorothy Halliday
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Saundra Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marion Harris
- Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amy Taylor
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Kathryn Myhill
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Hogben
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Audrey Ardern-Jones
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elena Castro
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Alexander Dias
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose de Alencar Gomes da Silva INCA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Diana M Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Green
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jorunn Eyfjord
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oskar Johannsson
- Landspitali - the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; St George's Hospital, Tooting, London, UK; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Karol Axcrona
- Department of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Anita V Mitra
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Moynihan
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Gad Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rebecca Collier
- Clinical Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Judith Offman
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Torelli T, Macchi A, Biasoni D, Stagni S, Tesone A, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Perioperative outcomes of post chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage IIA-III non seminomatous germ-cell tumors. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(21)00926-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Torelli T, Stagni S, Biasoni D, Tesone A, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Piva L, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Long term outcomes of initial observation in patients with CN0 low-risk penile squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(21)00922-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
21
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Zaborra C, Biasoni D, Torelli T, Stagni S, Tesone A, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Morosi C, Spreafico C, Marchianò A, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Renal tumor biopsy (RTB) in patients with cT1b-t4-m0 disease susceptible to radical nephrectomy: analysis of safety, accuracy and clinical impact on definitive management. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(21)01006-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Fankhauser C, Afferi L, Stroup S, Rocco N, Olson K, Bagrodia A, Cazzaniga W, Mayer E, Nicol D, Islamoglu E, De Vergie S, Ragheed S, Eggener S, Nazzani S, Nicolai N, Hugar L, Sexton W, Matei DV, Hermanns T, Hamilton R, Hiester A, Albers P, Clarke N, Mattei A. Perioperative safety and short-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01040-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
23
|
Marenghi C, Qiu Z, Nicolai N, Helleman J, Nieboer D, Rubio-Briones J, Carroll P, Cowan J, Lee L, Boutros P, Valdagni R. Adverse pathological findings in deferred radical prostatectomy in men under active surveillance for very low and low risk prostate cancers: Results from GAP3 active surveillance cohorts. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01419-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
24
|
Fankhauser CD, Oldenburg J, Albers P, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Boormans JL, Fischer S, Fizazi K, Gremmels H, Mayor de Castro J, Janisch F, Muilwijk T, Leão R, Nicol D, Nicolai N, Tandstad T, Pilar Laguna M. Recommendations to Balance Benefits and Risks Of Thromboprophylaxis and to Avoid Central Venous-access Devices During First-line Chemotherapy in Men with Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors: The European Association Of Urology Testicular Cancer Panel Position in 2021. Eur Urol 2021; 80:4-6. [PMID: 33722419 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Men with metastatic germ cell tumors undergoing chemotherapy are at high risk of venous thromboembolic events and low risk of bleeding. A central venous-access device should be avoided whenever possible. Thromboprophylaxis may be prescribed after balancing the risks and benefits for each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Pneumology Section, Universitätskliniken Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Hendrik Gremmels
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - M Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology Medipol Mega, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Avuzzi B, Tittarelli A, Andreani S, Noris Chiorda B, Seregni E, Villa S, Tana S, Valdagni R, Salvioni R, Biasoni D, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Nicolai N. Radiotherapy after testis-sparing surgery for seminoma in monorchid patients: safety and efficacy. Tumori 2021; 108:165-171. [PMID: 33588700 DOI: 10.1177/0300891621992428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate local control and longitudinal endocrine data in monorchid patients treated with testicular-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for seminomatous germ-cell tumors. METHODS We searched our database established in 2009 for patients with seminoma who received testis irradiation following partial orchiectomy up to 2018. Eleven patients were identified. All had associated germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) in surrounding parenchyma. Analysis focused on local control and testosterone levels preservation after RT. We considered age, baseline (pre-RT) testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, residual testicular volume, tumor size, and testosterone and LH levels trend over time in order to identify any association with endocrine impairment leading to hormonal replacement need. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 21 months, no local or distant relapses were observed and hormonal function was maintained in 54.5% of patients (6/11). No significant interactions were observed for the investigated covariates. Notably, we observed an association between higher baseline testosterone levels and a decreased risk of exogenous androgen replacement (hazard ratio [HR] 0.409, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.161-1.039, p = 0.060), whereas tumor size was associated with an increased risk of exogenous androgen replacement (HR 1.847, 95% CI 0.940-3.627, p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy after testicular sparing surgery is effective in preventing local disease relapse in presence of GCNIS in the medium term. This strategy allows a preservation of adequate endocrine function in about half of patients. More patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Avuzzi
- Radiation Oncology 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Tittarelli
- Cancer Registry Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Andreani
- Radiation Oncology 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Radiation Oncology 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore Seregni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Villa
- Radiation Oncology 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Tana
- Radiation Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Radiation Oncology 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alvisi MF, Dordoni P, Rancati T, Avuzzi B, Nicolai N, Badenchini F, De Luca L, Magnani T, Marenghi C, Menichetti J, Silvia V, Fabiana Z, Roberto S, Riccardo V, Lara B. Supporting Patients With Untreated Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: What Causes an Increase in Anxiety During the First 10 Months? Front Psychol 2020; 11:576459. [PMID: 33363494 PMCID: PMC7753742 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The psychological burden possibly deriving from not immediately undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) could be a potential disadvantage of active surveillance (AS), especially in the eve of some relevant clinical exams [i.e., re-biopsy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, and medical examination]. Even if it is known from the literature that the majority of PCa men in AS do not report heightened anxiety, there is a minority of patients who show clinically significant levels of anxiety after diagnosis. The present study aimed to investigate if demographic, clinical, and psychological variables at the entrance in AS (T0) were associated with the risk of developing clinically significant PCa-related anxiety 2 months before the first re-biopsy (T1) and to offer psychological support to improve quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods A total of 236 patients participated in the PCa Research International: AS (PRIAS) protocol and in PRIAS-QoL study. Demographic/clinical features, health-related QoL domains, coping with cancer, PCa-related anxiety [Memorial Anxiety Scale for PCa (MAX-PC)], personality traits, and decision-making-related factors were assessed at T0. MAX-PC was also administered at T1. PCa-related anxiety at T1 was considered to be of clinical significance if the MAX-PC score was ≥1.5. Multivariable logistic regression coupled to bootstrap was used to detect factors associated with high levels of anxiety. Results The median age was 64.4 years. Fifty-six patients (24%) reported MAX-PC total score above the cutoff. Three factors were associated with a high level of PCa anxiety at T1: anxious preoccupation [odds ratio (OR) = 4.36], extraversion (OR = 1.9), and prostate-related symptoms (median OR = 0.46). Physical well-being was associated with a low PCa anxiety subscale (median OR = 0.15); neuroticism and functional well-being were associated with PSA anxiety (median OR = 7.05 and 0.73, respectively). Neuroticism and helplessness/hopelessness were associated with fear of progression (median OR = 18.1 and 5.8, respectively). Conclusion Only a partial portion of the sample experienced significant levels of anxiety after 10 months. Psychological assessment should be routinely conducted to detect risk factors (i.e., anxious preoccupation, extraversion) for increased anxiety, offering tailored psychological interventions aimed at promoting interpersonal awareness and emotional well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paola Dordoni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia De Luca
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Magnani
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Marenghi
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Julia Menichetti
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Villa Silvia
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Zollo Fabiana
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvioni Roberto
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valdagni Riccardo
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Bellardita Lara
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Catanzaro M, Nazzani S, Macchi A, Aceti A, Tesone A, Stagni S, Torelli T, Colecchia M, Maccauro M, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Biasoni D, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Determinants of inguinal lymph node involvement and predicted rates of inguinal nodal disease in clinical N0 penile squamous cell carcinoma patients. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)35547-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
28
|
Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Macchi A, Tesone A, Aceti A, Torelli T, Stagni S, Maccauro M, Colecchia M, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Piva L, Biasoni D, Carmignani L, Montanari E, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy versus observation in clinical N0 penile squamous cell carcinoma: a large tertiary national referral center experience. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)35546-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Nicolai N, Nazzani S, Catanzaro M, Tesone A, Macchi A, Torelli T, Stagni S, Celso F, Agostini E, Cloecchia M, Avuzzi B, Lanocita R, Necchi A, Raggi D, Giannatempo P, Farè E, Salvioni R, Biasoni D. Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) as upfront management in stage II germ-cell tumours: evaluation of safety and efficacy of open and laparoscopic procedures. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)35543-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
30
|
Catanzaro M, Nazzani S, Torelli T, Aceti A, Macchi A, Tesone A, Stagni S, Maccauro M, Colecchia M, Lanocita R, Cascella T, Necchi A, Raggi D, Giannatempo P, Biasoni D, Salvioni R, Nicolai N. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for clinical N0 squamous cell penile carcinoma: a large, contemporary analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)35548-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
31
|
Nazzani S, Nicolai N. Editorial Comment to Ureteral location is associated with survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based analysis. Int J Urol 2020; 27:973. [PMID: 32862468 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Urologic Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Testis Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Badenchini F, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Bellardita L, Casale A, Catanzaro M, Claps M, Colecchia M, De Luca L, Di Florio T, Donegani S, Dordoni P, Macchi A, Messina A, Morlino S, Noris Chiorda B, Stagni S, Tesone A, Torelli T, Villa S, Zollo F, Magnani T, Rancati T, Valdagni R, Nicolai N. A predictive model to personalize follow up schedules for patients in active surveillance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33880-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
33
|
Boormans J, Mayor De Castro J, Fankhauser C, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Fizzazi K, Gremmels H, Nicolai N, Nicol D, Oldenburg J, Sylvester R, Laguna M. An individual patient data (IPD) prognostic factor study on the value of pathological factors in clinical stage I seminoma testis patients under active surveillance from the EAU Testicular Cancer Guidelines panel. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33812-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
34
|
Banna GL, Nicolai N, Palmieri G, Ottaviano M, Balzarini L, Barone D, Basso U, Bavila A, Bertoni F, Calliada F, Cai T, Carrafiello G, Condello C, Da Pozzo L, Di Nardo D, Fornarini G, Galetti TP, Garolla A, Giannatempo P, Guerra L, La Spina S, Malatino L, Marchiano' A, Monti M, Morbiato FF, Morelli F, Nole' F, Palazzi S, Procopio G, Rosti G, Sacco C, Salvetti A, Salvioni R, Sava T, Secondino S, Serpentini S, Spreafico C, Tavolini IM, Valcamonico F, Verri E, Zucali P, De Giorgi U. ☆Corrigendum to "Recommendations for surveillance and follow-up of men with testicular germ cell tumors: A multidisciplinary consensus conference by the Italian Germ cell cancer Group and the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica" [Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 137 (2019) (May) 154-164]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 146:102865. [PMID: 31927391 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Luigi Banna
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; AIOM - Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica, Italy.
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIU - Società Italiana di Urologia, Italy; AURO - Associazione Italiana Urologi Italiani, Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Balzarini
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIRM - Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Italy
| | - Domenico Barone
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIRM - Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Italy
| | | | | | - Filippo Bertoni
- AIRO - Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia Oncologica, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Calliada
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIRM - Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luigi Da Pozzo
- SIU - Società Italiana di Urologia, Italy; SIUrO - Società Italiana di Urologia Oncologica, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- AITT - Associazione Italiana Tumore Testicolo, Italy; FAVO - Federazione Italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Luca Guerra
- AIMN - Associazione Italiana Medicina Nucleare e Imaging Molecolare, Italy
| | | | | | - Alfonso Marchiano'
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIRM - Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Italy
| | - Mirko Monti
- AITT - Associazione Italiana Tumore Testicolo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Salvetti
- SIMG - Società Italiana della Medicina Generale e delle Cure Primarie, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Carlo Spreafico
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; SIRM - Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IGG Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group, Italy; AIOM - Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Honecker F, Aparicio J, Berney D, Beyer J, Bokemeyer C, Cathomas R, Clarke N, Cohn-Cedermark G, Daugaard G, Dieckmann KP, Fizazi K, Fosså S, Germa-Lluch JR, Giannatempo P, Gietema JA, Gillessen S, Haugnes HS, Heidenreich A, Hemminki K, Huddart R, Jewett MAS, Joly F, Lauritsen J, Lorch A, Necchi A, Nicolai N, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Ondruš D, Papachristofilou A, Powles T, Sohaib A, Ståhl O, Tandstad T, Toner G, Horwich A. ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1658-1686. [PMID: 30113631 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Honecker
- Tumor and Breast Center ZeTuP, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - J Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Berney
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - J Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R Cathomas
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - N Clarke
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G Cohn-Cedermark
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K-P Dieckmann
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - S Fosså
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - J R Germa-Lluch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S Gillessen
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H S Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT - The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - A Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-assisted and Specialised Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - K Hemminki
- Department of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Huddart
- Department of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - M A S Jewett
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - F Joly
- Department of Urology-Gynaecology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Urology, Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Heinrich-Heine University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - N Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology and Testis Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C Oing
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - D Ondruš
- 1st Department of Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - T Powles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A Sohaib
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - O Ståhl
- Department of Oncology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - T Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - G Toner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Horwich
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Page EC, Bancroft EK, Brook MN, Assel M, Hassan Al Battat M, Thomas S, Taylor N, Chamberlain A, Pope J, Raghallaigh HN, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Maehle L, Grindedal EM, James P, Mascarenhas L, McKinley J, Side L, Thomas T, van Asperen C, Vasen H, Kiemeney LA, Ringelberg J, Jensen TD, Osther PJS, Helfand BT, Genova E, Oldenburg RA, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Ong KR, Huber C, Lam J, Taylor L, Salinas M, Feliubadaló L, Oosterwijk JC, van Zelst-Stams W, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Domchek S, Powers J, Buys S, O'Toole K, Ausems MGEM, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K, Izatt L, Tripathi V, Teixeira MR, Cardoso M, Foulkes WD, Aprikian A, van Randeraad H, Davidson R, Longmuir M, Ruijs MWG, Helderman van den Enden ATJM, Adank M, Williams R, Andrews L, Murphy DG, Halliday D, Walker L, Liljegren A, Carlsson S, Azzabi A, Jobson I, Morton C, Shackleton K, Snape K, Hanson H, Harris M, Tischkowitz M, Taylor A, Kirk J, Susman R, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Spigelman A, Pachter N, Ahmed M, Ramon Y Cajal T, Zgajnar J, Brewer C, Gadea N, Brady AF, van Os T, Gallagher D, Johannsson O, Donaldson A, Barwell J, Nicolai N, Friedman E, Obeid E, Greenhalgh L, Murthy V, Copakova L, Saya S, McGrath J, Cooke P, Rønlund K, Richardson K, Henderson A, Teo SH, Arun B, Kast K, Dias A, Aaronson NK, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma CH, Castro E, Dearnaley D, Eccles DM, Tricker K, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Foster C, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Stefansdottir V, Khoo V, Lindeman GJ, Lubinski J, Axcrona K, Mikropoulos C, Mitra A, Moynihan C, Rennert G, Suri M, Wilson P, Dudderidge T, Offman J, Kote-Jarai Z, Vickers A, Lilja H, Eeles RA. Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Eur Urol 2019; 76:831-842. [PMID: 31537406 PMCID: PMC6880781 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in BRCA2 cause a higher risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer (PrCa). The IMPACT study is evaluating targeted PrCa screening using prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) in men with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. OBJECTIVE To report the utility of PSA screening, PrCa incidence, positive predictive value of PSA, biopsy, and tumour characteristics after 3 yr of screening, by BRCA status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Men aged 40-69 yr with a germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation and male controls testing negative for a familial BRCA1/2 mutation were recruited. Participants underwent PSA screening for 3 yr, and if PSA > 3.0 ng/ml, men were offered prostate biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PSA levels, PrCa incidence, and tumour characteristics were evaluated. Statistical analyses included Poisson regression offset by person-year follow-up, chi-square tests for proportion t tests for means, and Kruskal-Wallis for medians. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3027 patients (2932 unique individuals) were recruited (919 BRCA1 carriers, 709 BRCA1 noncarriers, 902 BRCA2 carriers, and 497 BRCA2 noncarriers). After 3 yr of screening, 527 men had PSA > 3.0 ng/ml, 357 biopsies were performed, and 112 PrCa cases were diagnosed (31 BRCA1 carriers, 19 BRCA1 noncarriers, 47 BRCA2 carriers, and 15 BRCA2 noncarriers). Higher compliance with biopsy was observed in BRCA2 carriers compared with noncarriers (73% vs 60%). Cancer incidence rate per 1000 person years was higher in BRCA2 carriers than in noncarriers (19.4 vs 12.0; p = 0.03); BRCA2 carriers were diagnosed at a younger age (61 vs 64 yr; p = 0.04) and were more likely to have clinically significant disease than BRCA2 noncarriers (77% vs 40%; p = 0.01). No differences in age or tumour characteristics were detected between BRCA1 carriers and BRCA1 noncarriers. The 4 kallikrein marker model discriminated better (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73) for clinically significant cancer at biopsy than PSA alone (AUC = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS After 3 yr of screening, compared with noncarriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers were associated with a higher incidence of PrCa, younger age of diagnosis, and clinically significant tumours. Therefore, systematic PSA screening is indicated for men with a BRCA2 mutation. Further follow-up is required to assess the role of screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers. PATIENT SUMMARY We demonstrate that after 3 yr of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, we detect more serious prostate cancers in men with BRCA2 mutations than in those without these mutations. We recommend that male BRCA2 carriers are offered systematic PSA screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark N Brook
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | | | - Sarah Thomas
- Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - D Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of medical genetics, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lyon Mascarenhas
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne McKinley
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucy Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Tessy Thomas
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Hans Vasen
- The Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Cancer, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Ringelberg
- The Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Cancer, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Brian T Helfand
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Division of Urology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Elena Genova
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Division of Urology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Rogier A Oldenburg
- Department of clinical genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokolorczyk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Kai-Ren Ong
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Camilla Huber
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jimmy Lam
- Department of Urology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Louise Taylor
- Department of Urology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA, Australia
| | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ICO-IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Catalan Institute of Oncology), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ICO-IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Catalan Institute of Oncology), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Susan Domchek
- Basser Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Powers
- Basser Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saundra Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Karen O'Toole
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- Clinical Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marta Cardoso
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - William D Foulkes
- Cancer Research Program, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Armen Aprikian
- Cancer Research Program, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Rosemarie Davidson
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Longmuir
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Muriel Adank
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel Williams
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dorothy Halliday
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Walker
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Annelie Liljegren
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ashraf Azzabi
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, UK
| | - Irene Jobson
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, UK
| | - Catherine Morton
- Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kylie Shackleton
- Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Marion Harris
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK; Academic Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Level 6 Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy Taylor
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Allan Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Waratah, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School, NSW, Australia; Cancer Genetics Clinic, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of WA, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- NE Thames Regional Genetics Service, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | | | - Carole Brewer
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Neus Gadea
- Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy-Galton Centre, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Theo van Os
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Oskar Johannsson
- Landspitali-the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Julian Barwell
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Elias Obeid
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Karina Rønlund
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Kate Richardson
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alex Henderson
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, UK; West Cumberland Infirmary, Whitehaven, UK
| | - Soo H Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Dias
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose de Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Audrey Ardern-Jones
- Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Castro
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- The University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen Tricker
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jorunn Eyfjord
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vincent Khoo
- Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; St George's Hospital, Tooting, London, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Karol Axcrona
- Department of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Anita Mitra
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Moynihan
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gadi Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Judith Offman
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Noris Chiorda B, Zollo F, Magnani T, Badenchini F, Gatto L, Claps M, Macchi A, Andreoli L, Nicolai N, Villa S, Valdagni R. How to implement the requirements of a quality assurance system for prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 39:41-47. [PMID: 31776738 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03024-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2003, the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG) launched a certification program aimed at improving the quality of cancer care. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of the Prostate Cancer Unit (PCU) at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, in the process towards DKG certification. METHODS In 2018, PCU decided to apply for certification by adopting DKG catalogue of requirements (CoR) and quality indicators. A multiprofessional working group was established with the aim of acting the necessary steps to meet DKG standards. RESULTS Our organizational setting (procedures, personnel) and activities were accurately analyzed, thus outlining strengths and weaknesses, and modified to comply with DKG CoR and indicators. As examples, (1) a quality management plan was developed; (2) measures were taken to strengthen the surgical expertise; (3) cases evaluated in weekly tumor boards were expanded to include surgical cases with pathological risk factors, metastatic, relapsed and castration-resistant patients; (4) a survey was added to the patient-dedicated initiatives already scheduled; (5) the TuDoc software became the tool to register all new cases of prostate cancer patients referred to PCU. CONCLUSIONS The process of certification requires many efforts but represents a unique opportunity of improving quality of care of prostate cancer patients, making it comparable on an international scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Division of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zollo
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Magnani
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Gatto
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Melanie Claps
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Macchi
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Division of Oncologic Urologic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laure Andreoli
- Division of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Division of Oncologic Urologic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Villa
- Division of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Division of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Prostate Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Torelli T, Paolini B, Catanzaro MA, Nicolai N, Colecchia M, Biasoni D, Macchi A, Stagni S, Tesone A, Salvioni R. The Role of Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy in Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma: A Case Series of Three HIV-Negative HHV-8-Positive Patients. CMI 2019. [DOI: 10.7175/cmi.v13i1.1403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a rare tumor of vascular origin. It is quite common in HIV patients. It is rarely located on the glans penis, especially in HIV-negative patients (just some tens in the literature). Owing to the rarity of the disease, both the real impact on survival and the most suitable therapy are not known.However, in this 3-patient case series, carbon dioxide laser therapy was effective both for local control and survival. In fact, two late relapses but no disease-related death were recorded. Probably, KS in HIV-negative patients is a slowly progressive disease, not so aggressive as in HIV-positive patients. Laser therapy is easy, fast, and cheap, and may treat the disease radically.If these data are confirmed by further studies, in the foreseeable future, laser therapy may become the gold standard for treating HIV-negative patients affected by penile KS.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nicolai N, Biasoni D, Catanzaro MA, Colecchia M, Trama A, Hackl M, Eycken EV, Henau K, Dimitrova N, Sekerija M, Dušek L, Mägi M, Malila N, Leinonen M, Velten M, Troussard X, Bouvier V, Guizard AV, Bouvier AM, Arveux P, Maynadié M, Woronoff AS, Robaszkiewic M, Baldi I, Monnereau A, Tretarre B, Colonna M, Molinié F, Bara S, Schvartz C, Lapôtre-Ledoux B, Grosclaude P, Stabenow R, Luttmann S, Nennecke A, Engel J, Schubert-Fritschle G, Heidrich J, Holleczek B, Jónasson JG, Clough-Gorr K, Comber H, Mazzoleni G, Giacomin A, Sutera Sardo A, Barchielli A, Serraino D, De Angelis R, Mallone S, Tavilla A, Pierannunzio D, Rossi S, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Pannozzo F, Gennaro V, Benfatto L, Ricci P, Autelitano M, Spagnoli G, Fusco M, Usala M, Vitale F, Michiara M, Tumino R, Mangone L, Falcini F, Ferretti S, Filiberti RA, Marani E, Iannelli A, Sensi F, Piffer S, Gentilini M, Madeddu A, Ziino A, Maspero S, Candela P, Stracci F, Tagliabue G, Rugge M, Trama A, Gatta G, Botta L, Capocaccia R, Pildava S, Smailyte G, Calleja N, Johannesen TB, Rachtan J, Góźdź S, Błaszczyk J, Kępska K, de Lacerda GF, Bento MJ, Miranda A, Diba CS, Almar E, Larrañaga N, de Munain AL, Torrella-Ramos A, Díaz García JM, Marcos-Gragera R, Sanchez MJ, Navarro C, Salmeron D, Moreno-Iribas C, Galceran J, Carulla M, Mousavi M, Bouchardy C, M. Ess S, Bordoni A, Konzelmann I, Rashbass J, Gavin A, Brewster DH, Huws DW, Visser O, Bielska-Lasota M, Primic-Zakelj M, Kunkler I, Benhamou E. Testicular germ-cell tumours and penile squamous cell carcinoma: Appropriate management makes the difference. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
40
|
Torrente S, Andreani S, Badenchini F, Rancati T, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Morlino S, Bedini N, Villa S, Noris Chiorda B, Palorini F, Andreoli L, Di Florio T, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Biasoni D, Torelli T, Tesone A, Nicolai N, Valdagni R. Clinical Results for an Active Surveillance Cohort with Localized Prostate Cancer Receiving RT after Exiting Active Surveillance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
41
|
Johnstone PAS, Boulware D, Djajadiningrat R, Ottenhof S, Necchi A, Catanzaro M, Ye D, Zhu Y, Nicolai N, Horenblas S, Spiess PE. Primary Penile Cancer: The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of Extranodal Extension in Lymph Nodes. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 5:737-741. [PMID: 30327282 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In head and neck cancer, the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in lymph nodes (LNs) has been shown prospectively to require adding chemotherapy to postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Limited data exist regarding ENE in LNs from primary penile cancer (PeCa). OBJECTIVE To determine the association of RT and ENE in PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 93 patients with pT1-4 N3 M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition) squamous cell carcinoma of the penis across four international centers. INTERVENTION If the inguinal nodal specimen had ENE or two or more positive inguinal LNs, RT was delivered to an ipsilateral inguinal field. An ipsilateral pelvic field was added for positive pelvic LNs on dissection. The delivered dose was usually 50Gy in 25 daily fractions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Clinical and demographic characteristics of relapse-free (RFS), disease-specific (DSS), and overall (OS) survival were compared by ENE status and receipt of adjuvant RT. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Seventy-two percent of patients had inguinal ENE, and 49% had pelvic ENE. On multivariable analysis (MVA) of ENE-negative patients, an OS benefit was noted with postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.038) and inguinopelvic RT (p=0.037). RFS suffered with worsening grade of the lesion (moderately: p=0.027; poorly: p=0.038), but was improved with groin (p=0.016) and inguinopelvic (p=0.006) RT. On MVA of patients with ENE, inguinopelvic RT was associated with better DSS (p=0.041). Grade impacted DSS (moderately: p=0.043; poorly: p=0.033), and poorly differentiated lesions impacted RFS (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS Inguinopelvic RT may benefit regional control in PeCa patients with positive pelvic LNs, but this appears to be limited to those without ENE. PATIENT SUMMARY For patients with penile cancer and positive pelvic lymph nodes, postoperative radiation therapy was found to decrease the likelihood of disease recurrence in the groin or pelvis only if extranodal extension was absent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Boulware
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Rosa Djajadiningrat
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Ottenhof
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Purpose We investigated the following issues regarding laparoscopic adrenalectomy: techniques and advantages, indications in adrenal diseases, and the special case of pheochromocytoma. Methods Qualified literature reports were reviewed and integrated with results of our initial experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Results Most authors prefer a transperitoneal approach, but some (including ourselves) use the retroperitoneal approach. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is as effective and safe as traditional surgery, but the associated morbidity was found to be much lower in laparoscopic series. The need for conversion to open surgery does not exceed 5% of all cases. Practically all adrenal masses can be managed by laparoscopy. The only clinical situations where laparoscopy is not recommended as first choice are large adrenal masses (>6 cm) and gross cortical carcinoma, which are related conditions. Laparoscopy is also indicated in pheochromocytoma. No mortality and an elevated hypertension cure rate (75–100%) have been reported. Hypertension and plasma volume contraction must be normalized prior to surgery. Special attention should be paid to possible severe blood pressure variations during surgery. Partial adrenalectomy has been recently proposed for bilateral and familial pheochromocytoma in order to avoid lifelong mineral corticoid replacement therapy. Conclusions Laparoscopic adrenalectomy currently represents the first surgical choice for adrenal masses. Only large lesions that are suspected to be malignant should not be electively submitted to this procedure. Pheochromocytoma can be safely and effectively treated with laparoscopic surgery; special care for related symptoms is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Intracavitary Surgery, Urology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mikropoulos C, Hutten Selkirk CG, Saya S, Bancroft E, Vertosick E, Dadaev T, Brendler C, Page E, Dias A, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Maehle L, Axcrona K, Richardson K, Eccles D, Jensen T, Osther PJ, van Asperen CJ, Vasen H, Kiemeney LA, Ringelberg J, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Hart R, Glover W, Lam J, Taylor L, Salinas M, Feliubadaló L, Oldenburg R, Cremers R, Verhaegh G, van Zelst-Stams WA, Oosterwijk JC, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Buys SS, Conner T, Domchek S, Powers J, Ausems MGEM, Teixeira MR, Maia S, Izatt L, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Foulkes WD, Boshari T, Davidson R, Ruijs M, Helderman-van den Enden ATJM, Andrews L, Walker L, Snape K, Henderson A, Jobson I, Lindeman GJ, Liljegren A, Harris M, Adank MA, Kirk J, Taylor A, Susman R, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Pachter N, Spigelman A, Side L, Zgajnar J, Mora J, Brewer C, Gadea N, Brady AF, Gallagher D, van Os T, Donaldson A, Stefansdottir V, Barwell J, James PA, Murphy D, Friedman E, Nicolai N, Greenhalgh L, Obeid E, Murthy V, Copakova L, McGrath J, Teo SH, Strom S, Kast K, Leongamornlert DA, Chamberlain A, Pope J, Newlin AC, Aaronson N, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma C, Castro E, Dearnaley D, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Foster CS, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Lubinski J, Grindedal EM, McKinley J, Shackleton K, Mitra AV, Moynihan C, Rennert G, Suri M, Tricker K, Moss S, Kote-Jarai Z, Vickers A, Lilja H, Helfand BT, Eeles RA. Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition. Br J Cancer 2018; 118:e17. [PMID: 29509747 PMCID: PMC5877440 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2018.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.429.
Collapse
|
44
|
Boormans J, Mayor de Castro J, Marconi L, Yuan Y, Laguna Pes M, Bokemeyer C, Nicolai N, Algaba F, Oldenburg J, Albers P. Testicular tumour size and rete testis invasion as prognostic factors for the risk of relapse of clinical stage I seminoma testis patients under surveillance: A systematic review by the Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(18)32055-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
45
|
Nicolai N, Alvisi M, Rancati T, Avuzzi B, Badenchini F, Catanzaro M, Colecchia M, Di Florio T, Magnani T, Marenghi C, Morlino S, Noris Chiorda B, Paolini B, Stagni S, Tesone A, Torelli T, Villa S, Zaffaroni N, Salvioni R, Valdagni R. Active surveillance in prostate cancer patients: Modeling upgrading and upsizing at 1 year rebiopsy. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
90 Background: Prostate biopsy findings at diagnosis and follow-up are essential criteria in Active Surveillance (AS). In a previous work (Nicolai Eur Urol Suppl 2013) upgrading (UPG) and upsizing (UPS) at 1-yr rebiopsy resulted to be independent outcomes with different predictors. Aim of the present work is to validate these models on an independent population and to evaluate the probability of not-developing UPG, thus the chance of continuing AS Methods: Pts enrolled in 2011-2017 were considered for validation, while 318 AS pts enrolled in 2005-2011 were considered for model development. UPG model included: age (risk), PSA density (risk), prostate volume (>60 cc, protective); UPS model: age (protective), % core length containing cancer (>5%, risk), number of positive cores (>1, risk) Performance on the independent population was evaluated through AUC and calibration. Logistic model for not-developing UPG at 1 yr was fitted using all available AS pts Results: 433 pts were included in the validation set. UPG and UPS were registered in 43 and 29 pts, respectively; 38 pts had UPG+UPS. Predictors for UPG and UPS were mainly confirmed in the validation cohort (Table), with Odds Ratios (OR) very similar to the development model. Discrimination was confirmed (AUCs) and calibration was excellent (slope~1, R2>0.90). Probability of not-developing UPG (evaluated on 751 pts) was associated to age, prostate volume and PSA density (Table). Conclusions: UPG and UPS in AS pts should be considered as independent events and their management implying different strategies. Specifically, age, volume and PSA density play a key role in the chance to continue AS, i.e. in not developing UPG. A nomogram estimating the likelihood of continuing AS has been developed and will be presented. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Nicolai
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tiziana Rancati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mario Catanzaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Tiziana Magnani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sara Morlino
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Biagio Paolini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tesone
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Villa
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Zaffaroni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giannatempo P, Raggi D, Tagliabue E, Catanzaro M, Biasoni D, Torelli T, Stagni S, Nicolai N, Piva L, Salvioni R, Mariani L, Necchi A. Effect of number of computed tomography (CT) scans during follow-up (FUP) of patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma: A trial-level meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
564 Background: Despite the overall high cure-rate for patients (pts) with CSI seminoma (sem) regardless of the intervention used, huge discrepancy exists in the number of CT scans that are proposed to pts during FUP period, mainly during active surveillance (AS). The impact of such discrepancy in diagnosing pts with a high-risk relapse was assessed in published literature with a meta-analysis (MA). Methods: We searched for arms of studies of AS or active treatment (AT, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy) in pts with CSI sem. Meta-analytic techniques were used to pool and compare study level data of AS and AT groups and to study the impact of the number of CT scans (as a continuous variable) during FUP upon the % of pts with CSIII or with IGCCCG intermediate (int) prognosis sem at relapse. Results: 22 studies were analyzed (33 arms, n = 11025 pts). 39.6% had a high-risk sem, 38.8% (n = 4274) underwent AS vs 61.2% (n = 6751) AT. The number of CT scans ≤2y ranged 4-8, and 0-7 for AS and AT groups. Overall, 922 pts experienced a relapse (651 in AS and 271 in AT arms), 73.9% <2y and 22.3% at 2-5y FUP. Statistical modeling showed that the estimated rates of CSIII relapse (6% in AS, 32% in AT group, p = 0.0068) and int prognosis relapse (2% in AS, 11% in AT group, p = 0.0051), were divergent for the two groups. A higher number of CT scans in the first 2 years of FUP tended to reduce the occurrence rate of both endpoints, but failed to reach statistical significance in AS (p = 0.334 for CSIII, unidentifiable for int prognosis relapse), as well as in AT (p = 0.438, p = 0.103). The number of CT scans in 3-5y FUP had an even weaker prognostic effect. Similar trends were observed in AS cohort after adjusting for the CSI risk group. Conclusions: In this trial-level MA we did not find a statistically-significant association between the number of CT scans performed during FUP of CSI sem pts and the diagnosis of high-risk relapses. Huge discrepancy in the total number of CT scans was generally found between arms. In contrast, as expected, the pattern of relapse of CSI sem was different according to the treatment group. Based on these results, there is room for consistently reducing the number of CT scans during FUP of CSI sem pts undergoing AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tagliabue
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Torelli T, Lughezzani G, Catanzaro M, Nicolai N, Colecchia M, Biasoni D, Piva L, Maffezzini M, Stagni S, Necchi A, Giannatempo P, Farè E, Salvioni R. Prostatic Metastases from Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Cancer: Two Case Reports and a Review of the Literature. Tumori 2018; 99:e203-7. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161309900513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Prostatic metastases from testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are extremely uncommon. To the best of our knowledge, only five cases of prostatic metastases from seminoma have been reported in the literature. Conversely, no cases of metastases to the prostate from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have been previously reported. Case presentation We present two patients who developed prostatic metastases 5 and 21 years after the initial diagnosis. The first case concerned a 28-year-old Caucasian man who underwent a right orchiectomy and right retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for a stage I NSGCT in 1999 and five years later was diagnosed with prostatic metastases. The second case concerned a 30-year-old man treated with a right orchiectomy and right RPLND for stage I NSGCT in 1985 who was diagnosed with prostatic metastases in 2006, 21 years after primary surgery. We reviewed the available literature on the topic. Conclusion Prostatic metastases from TCGTs are highly unusual. Lower urinary tract symptoms in patients treated for previous testicular cancer require immediate clinical attention. However, because of their extreme rarity, specific clinical investigations to screen for possible prostatic involvement from TGCT should not be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tullio Torelli
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Maffezzini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elena Farè
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mattavelli F, Collini P, Pizzi N, Nicolai N, Pennacchioli E, Group RSFTTS. Thyroid as a Target of Metastases: A Case of Metastatic Seminoma in a Patient who Died of a Second Cancer. Tumori 2018; 95:91-3. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160909500115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background The typical route of metastatic spread of testicular seminoma is through lymphatic pathways, whereas hematogenous dissemination is less frequent. The thyroid is a rare site of metastases from any cancer, but any patient with a previous oncologic disease should inquire about a thyroid nodule. Case report We present a case of a 37-years-old man with a testicular seminoma with a peculiar metastatic spread behavior, with previously unreported histological findings. The initial clinical appearance was of a stage I testicular tumor with normal tumor markers. Nevertheless, the tumor appeared to have spread directly to the thyroid gland and subsequently to latero-cervical nodes, about 3 years after the first diagnosis. Perhaps the patient could have been treated with chemotherapy alone, as he developed a second cancer 6 years after the diagnosis, and that event could have been related to delivered therapies, mainly radiotherapy. Conclusion This type of seminoma spread has previously been described only once, and it is not a typical route for metastasis by seminoma. In view of this unusual finding, we reinforce the need for accurate diagnostic planning of any thyroid nodule occurring in a patient with a previous cancer history. Accurate staging is crucial in planning the treatment and follow-up of seminoma. Currently, greater attention is due to management of the disease at diagnosis, as emerging data support a risk of a second cancer among patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy for a testicular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Mattavelli
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Collini
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Natalia Pizzi
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pizzocaro G, Schiavo M, Solima S, Vitellaro M, Blasoni D, Nicolai N. Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection (RPLND) in Low-Stage Nonseminomatous Germ-Cell Testicular Tumors (NSGCTT) Performed by a Senior Surgeon: 1999–2003. Urologia 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0391560310077017s10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic RPLND for low-stages NSGCTT is controversial: it is performed and recommended by excellent laparoscopic surgeons, but it is not widely used. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the results achieved by a senior surgeon, expert in open RPLND, who was introduced to laparoscopic surgery by excellent laparoscopists (LN, CU, GJ). Patients and Methods of the 48 operated patients, 36 had primary RPLND for clinical stage I disease (22 TINO, 7 TxNO, 5 T2–3 NO and 2 TIS1 NO) and 12 had post-chemotherapy surgery for IIA and IIB retroperitoneal nodes with normalized AFP and HCG. L-RPLND was performed with 4 ports and the en bloc removal of unilateral retroperitoneal nodes with the spermatic vessels. No post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy was planned for patients with documented nodal metastases as for open RPLND since 1985. Results Average operative time was 3.30'for the 36 clinical stage I patients and 4 hours for post-chemotherapy surgery. Blood loss was minimal in all cases, because of early conversion to open surgery in all patients with no immediate hemostasis at L-RPLND. Metastases were found in 6 (17%) out of the 36 clinical stage I patients: none in the 22 pTI, 1 in the 7 Tx, 3 in the 5 pT2–3 and in 2 of the 2 pT1S1 patients. Residual teratoma was found in 6 of the 12 patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage IIA or IIB disease. The other 6 had fibrosis-necrosis. Further metastases developed in 2 of the 30 patients with negative nodes: 1 in the lung in a pT1, and 1 in a pT2 patient with increasing markers. Surprisingly, the first two pT2–3 patients with positive nodes developed liver metastases in a few months after L-RPLND. Consequently, all following patients with active metastases at L-RPLND received 2 courses of adjuvant PEB. All 4 patients who relapsed were cured, are alive and disease-free. Conclusions L-RPLND is a very demanding operation, which appears to be more a staging procedure than a curative operation. It is ideal for pT1 clinical stage I and for post-chemotherapy stages IIA& B with residual teratoma and normalized markers, but wait & see in good risk and open RPLND in high risk patients are very competing. Only few reports compared laparoscopic versus open RPLND, but not in a randomized study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Pizzocaro
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
- Clinica Urologica II, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - M. Schiavo
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
| | - S. Solima
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
| | - M. Vitellaro
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
| | - D. Blasoni
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
| | - N. Nicolai
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mikropoulos C, Selkirk CGH, Saya S, Bancroft E, Vertosick E, Dadaev T, Brendler C, Page E, Dias A, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Maehle L, Axcrona K, Richardson K, Eccles D, Jensen T, Osther PJ, van Asperen CJ, Vasen H, Kiemeney LA, Ringelberg J, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Hart R, Glover W, Lam J, Taylor L, Salinas M, Feliubadaló L, Oldenburg R, Cremers R, Verhaegh G, van Zelst-Stams WA, Oosterwijk JC, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Buys SS, Conner T, Domchek S, Powers J, Ausems MGEM, Teixeira MR, Maia S, Izatt L, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Foulkes WD, Boshari T, Davidson R, Ruijs M, Helderman-van den Enden ATJM, Andrews L, Walker L, Snape K, Henderson A, Jobson I, Lindeman GJ, Liljegren A, Harris M, Adank MA, Kirk J, Taylor A, Susman R, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Pachter N, Spigelman A, Side L, Zgajnar J, Mora J, Brewer C, Gadea N, Brady AF, Gallagher D, van Os T, Donaldson A, Stefansdottir V, Barwell J, James PA, Murphy D, Friedman E, Nicolai N, Greenhalgh L, Obeid E, Murthy V, Copakova L, McGrath J, Teo SH, Strom S, Kast K, Leongamornlert DA, Chamberlain A, Pope J, Newlin AC, Aaronson N, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma C, Castro E, Dearnaley D, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Foster CS, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Lubinski J, Grindedal EM, McKinley J, Shackleton K, Mitra AV, Moynihan C, Rennert G, Suri M, Tricker K, Moss S, Kote-Jarai Z, Vickers A, Lilja H, Helfand BT, Eeles RA. Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition. Br J Cancer 2018; 118:266-276. [PMID: 29301143 PMCID: PMC5785754 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA-velocity (PSAV) have been used to identify men at risk of prostate cancer (PrCa). The IMPACT study is evaluating PSA screening in men with a known genetic predisposition to PrCa due to BRCA1/2 mutations. This analysis evaluates the utility of PSA and PSAV for identifying PrCa and high-grade disease in this cohort. METHODS PSAV was calculated using logistic regression to determine if PSA or PSAV predicted the result of prostate biopsy (PB) in men with elevated PSA values. Cox regression was used to determine whether PSA or PSAV predicted PSA elevation in men with low PSAs. Interaction terms were included in the models to determine whether BRCA status influenced the predictiveness of PSA or PSAV. RESULTS 1634 participants had ⩾3 PSA readings of whom 174 underwent PB and 45 PrCas diagnosed. In men with PSA >3.0 ng ml-l, PSAV was not significantly associated with presence of cancer or high-grade disease. PSAV did not add to PSA for predicting time to an elevated PSA. When comparing BRCA1/2 carriers to non-carriers, we found a significant interaction between BRCA status and last PSA before biopsy (P=0.031) and BRCA2 status and PSAV (P=0.024). However, PSAV was not predictive of biopsy outcome in BRCA2 carriers. CONCLUSIONS PSA is more strongly predictive of PrCa in BRCA carriers than non-carriers. We did not find evidence that PSAV aids decision-making for BRCA carriers over absolute PSA value alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina G Hutten Selkirk
- The John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Sibel Saya
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Emily Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Tokhir Dadaev
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Charles Brendler
- The John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Elizabeth Page
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alexander Dias
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0372, Norway
| | - Karol Axcrona
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog 1478, Norway
| | - Kate Richardson
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Diana Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Thomas Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle 7100, Denmark
| | - Palle J Osther
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle 7100, Denmark
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Vasen
- Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Ringelberg
- Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-204, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokolorczyk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-204, Poland
| | - Rachel Hart
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | - Wayne Glover
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | - Jimmy Lam
- Department of Urology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA 5041, Australia
| | - Louise Taylor
- Department of Urology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA 5041, Australia
| | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL, CIBERONC), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08908, Spain
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL, CIBERONC), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08908, Spain
| | - Rogier Oldenburg
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben Cremers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GA 6525, The Netherlands
| | - Gerald Verhaegh
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GA 6525, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy A van Zelst-Stams
- Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK
| | | | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
| | - Tom Conner
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
| | - Susan Domchek
- Basser Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Powers
- Basser Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Margreet GEM Ausems
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, CX, The Netherlands
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
| | - Sofia Maia
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
| | - Louise Izatt
- South East Thames Genetics Service, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne 50937, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne 50937, Germany
| | - William D Foulkes
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Talia Boshari
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Duncan Guthrie Institute of Medical Genetics, Yorkhill NHS Trust, Glasgow G38SJ, UK
| | - Marielle Ruijs
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Lisa Walker
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Katie Snape
- St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Alex Henderson
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - Irene Jobson
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Stem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Annelie Liljegren
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Solna 171 77, Sweden
| | - Marion Harris
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Muriel A Adank
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2155, Australia
| | - Amy Taylor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | | | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of WA, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Allan Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent’s Clinical School, NSW 2052, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Lucy Side
- NE Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond St Hospital & UCL Institute of Women’s Health, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | | | | | - Carole Brewer
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Neus Gadea
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London HA1 3UJ, UK
| | | | - Theo van Os
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Julian Barwell
- University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
- University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Declan Murphy
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | | | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Cheshire and Mersey Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Elias Obeid
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
| | - Lucia Copakova
- National Cancer Institute, Bratislava 83310, Slovak Republic
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Sara Strom
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | | | - Anthony Chamberlain
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Jenny Pope
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Anna C Newlin
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Neil Aaronson
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Bangma
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Castro
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - David Dearnaley
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jorunn Eyfjord
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
| | - Alison Falconer
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, London W2 1NY, UK
| | | | | | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Oskar Johannsson
- Landspitali—the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-204, Poland
| | | | - Joanne McKinley
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Kylie Shackleton
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Anita V Mitra
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Clare Moynihan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Gad Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
| | - Mohnish Suri
- Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Karen Tricker
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - The IMPACT study collaborators91
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- The John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0372, Norway
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog 1478, Norway
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle 7100, Denmark
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors, Leiden, ZA 2333, The Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GA 6525, The Netherlands
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-204, Poland
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
- Department of Urology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA 5041, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL, CIBERONC), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08908, Spain
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
- Basser Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, CX, The Netherlands
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
- South East Thames Genetics Service, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne 50937, Germany
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
- Duncan Guthrie Institute of Medical Genetics, Yorkhill NHS Trust, Glasgow G38SJ, UK
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, HX 6229, The Netherlands
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle NE1 3BZ, UK
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Stem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Solna 171 77, Sweden
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2155, Australia
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
- The Genetic Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 76100, Israel
- Genetic Services of WA, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent’s Clinical School, NSW 2052, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- NE Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond St Hospital & UCL Institute of Women’s Health, London WC1N 3JH, UK
- Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
- Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona 08041, Spain
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Spain
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London HA1 3UJ, UK
- St James’ Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- St Michael’s Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, UK
- Landspitali—the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
- University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
- University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
- Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano 20133, Italy
- Cheshire and Mersey Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
- National Cancer Institute, Bratislava 83310, Slovak Republic
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Prostate Cancer Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid 28029, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, London W2 1NY, UK
- HCA Healthcare Laboratories, London WC1E 6JA, UK
- University Hospital, Umea 907 37, Sweden
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
- Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
- The IMPACT Study Collaborators List see Appendix 1
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden
| | - Sue Moss
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Brian T Helfand
- The John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|